SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 1
Download to read offline
Innovations in Simulation:
Career Counseling and the Mock Interview
Experience during the Fourth Year
Alison Martin, MEd, Jennifer Rachow, BHS, Nate Beucke, MD, Dena Higbee, MS, Jen Doty, RN, BSN, Rachel Brown, MD
PURPOSE:
Creating career counseling resources around writing
effective personal statements (PS), creating a concise
curriculum vitae (CV), and participation in simulated
residency interviews for students entering their M4
year has proven to be a helpful integrated model to
assist students with feeling more prepared for the
interview season.
NEED FOR INNOVATION:
With increasing class sizes and stagnant growth
in graduate medical education positions the
residency match process becomes more competitive
each year putting students who are unprepared for
residency interviews at a distinct disadvantage.
The results of the 2014 NMRP Program Director
survey for all specialties show that 93% of programs
rate interactions with faculty during interview and
interpersonal skills as the two top factors when
developing their rank order list.
Integrating counseling activities around PS and CV
development accompanied with simulated interview
practice advances preparation for the high stakes
interview experience.
COLLABORATION:
 Student Services
 Career Advising
 Surgical Educator
 Clinical Simulation Center
 Standardized Interviewers
 Observers
PRE-MOCK INTERVIEW TASKS:
 Determine simulation center availability during
September & October
 Avoid dates w/ academic conflicts
 Inform M3s during May class meeting about the
mock interview opportunity- highly recommend
participation
 Request CVs & PSs well in advance for advising
critique
 Encourage professional attire
 Send doodle request for date/time preference to
students
 Develop interview style scenarios & observation
forms
 Review and customize potential questions for
standardized interviewers based on CV & PS
 Recruit/train volunteer interviewers w/ health
education experience
 Recruit/train staff observers
 Confirm video technology/recording
POST-MOCK INTERVIEW TASKS:
 One observer per interview- 2 interviews total- and
interviewer give verbal feedback immediately
following each interview
 Group debrief with additional interview tips after
interviews completed for the day
 Evaluation forms collected, scanned & emailed to
participants
 Video recording made available to participants and
observers for additional feedback, if requested
 Survey students assessing helpfulness of
exercise
“Loved getting questions
about my CV, because that
really simulates a true
interview.”
Areas for Improvement
 Offer the experience over three (3) months
(August-October) rather than two (2) months
(September-October) making it more accessible for
those going through the early match and for those
on away rotations.
 Critiques of the Personal Statement and
Curriculum Vitae shall occur several weeks prior to
the interview and are automatic rather than
optional.
Holistic
Admissions
Patient-Based
Curriculum
Career
Advising
CV Review
Personal
Statement
Review
Mock
Interviews
2015
99% Match
Rate
Class of 2015 Outcomes
57 Participants
Class of 2014 Outcomes
34 Participants
Post Mock Interview Survey n=29
Helpfulness
 79% Very Helpful
 21% Helpful
 0% Somewhat Helpful
 0% Somewhat Not Helpful
 0% Not Helpful
Seemed
Realistic
 35% Very Realistic
 48% Realistic
 14% Somewhat Realistic
 3% Somewhat Unrealistic
 0% Unrealistic
Better
Prepared for
Interviews
 65% Very Prepared
 28% Prepared
 7% Somewhat Prepared
 0% Somewhat Unprepared
 0% Not Prepared
Match National MU
2015 93.9% 99%
2014 94.4% 94%
2013 93.7% 95%
2012 95.1% 92%
Background
School of Medicine
University of Missouri Health System
Medicine.missouri.edu
Post Mock Interview Survey n=31
Helpfulness
 68% Very Helpful
 26% Helpful
 6% Somewhat Helpful
 0% Somewhat Not Helpful
 0% Not Helpful
Seemed
Realistic
 36% Very Realistic
 42% Realistic
 16% Somewhat Realistic
 6% Somewhat Unrealistic
 0% Unrealistic
Better
Prepared for
Interviews
 42% Very Prepared
 42% Prepared
 16% Somewhat Prepared
 0% Somewhat Unprepared
 0% Not Prepared
Methods

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

CGSA CATSA Poster 2014
CGSA CATSA Poster 2014CGSA CATSA Poster 2014
CGSA CATSA Poster 2014
Alison Martin
 
CGEA2011Patient Centeredness
CGEA2011Patient CenterednessCGEA2011Patient Centeredness
CGEA2011Patient Centeredness
Alison Martin
 
Alison Poster Presentations & Teaching
Alison Poster Presentations & TeachingAlison Poster Presentations & Teaching
Alison Poster Presentations & Teaching
Alison Martin
 
CGSA Integrated Residency Poster 06-16
CGSA Integrated Residency Poster 06-16CGSA Integrated Residency Poster 06-16
CGSA Integrated Residency Poster 06-16
Alison Martin
 

Viewers also liked (6)

CGSA MedPrep Poster
CGSA MedPrep PosterCGSA MedPrep Poster
CGSA MedPrep Poster
 
Ambassador Poster
Ambassador PosterAmbassador Poster
Ambassador Poster
 
CGSA CATSA Poster 2014
CGSA CATSA Poster 2014CGSA CATSA Poster 2014
CGSA CATSA Poster 2014
 
CGEA2011Patient Centeredness
CGEA2011Patient CenterednessCGEA2011Patient Centeredness
CGEA2011Patient Centeredness
 
Alison Poster Presentations & Teaching
Alison Poster Presentations & TeachingAlison Poster Presentations & Teaching
Alison Poster Presentations & Teaching
 
CGSA Integrated Residency Poster 06-16
CGSA Integrated Residency Poster 06-16CGSA Integrated Residency Poster 06-16
CGSA Integrated Residency Poster 06-16
 

Similar to 2015 2_CGEA_MOCK_INTERVIEWS

Online Assessment and Feedback Seminar
Online Assessment and Feedback SeminarOnline Assessment and Feedback Seminar
Online Assessment and Feedback Seminar
Julian Green
 
Interview with a Nursing Quality EXpert.docx
Interview with a Nursing Quality EXpert.docxInterview with a Nursing Quality EXpert.docx
Interview with a Nursing Quality EXpert.docx
write4
 
1CPD researchStudent nameInstructor nameCourse.docx
1CPD researchStudent nameInstructor nameCourse.docx1CPD researchStudent nameInstructor nameCourse.docx
1CPD researchStudent nameInstructor nameCourse.docx
felicidaddinwoodie
 
Effects of Quantity-Based Staff Performance Indicators on Performance Quality
Effects of Quantity-Based Staff Performance Indicators on Performance QualityEffects of Quantity-Based Staff Performance Indicators on Performance Quality
Effects of Quantity-Based Staff Performance Indicators on Performance Quality
Suzanne Akemi Sannwald
 
Supervising Pgme Facilitators Psych Society Conference August 2009
Supervising Pgme Facilitators Psych Society Conference August 2009Supervising Pgme Facilitators Psych Society Conference August 2009
Supervising Pgme Facilitators Psych Society Conference August 2009
LLKing
 

Similar to 2015 2_CGEA_MOCK_INTERVIEWS (20)

FA14 MIP Report
FA14 MIP ReportFA14 MIP Report
FA14 MIP Report
 
Streamlining the Residency Application and Match Process: Innovations in Appl...
Streamlining the Residency Application and Match Process: Innovations in Appl...Streamlining the Residency Application and Match Process: Innovations in Appl...
Streamlining the Residency Application and Match Process: Innovations in Appl...
 
Online Assessment and Feedback Seminar
Online Assessment and Feedback SeminarOnline Assessment and Feedback Seminar
Online Assessment and Feedback Seminar
 
Interview Process Instructional Plan
Interview Process Instructional PlanInterview Process Instructional Plan
Interview Process Instructional Plan
 
Training and Supervision of Career Advisors
Training and Supervision of Career AdvisorsTraining and Supervision of Career Advisors
Training and Supervision of Career Advisors
 
How to Navigate the Residency Selection Process
How to Navigate the Residency Selection ProcessHow to Navigate the Residency Selection Process
How to Navigate the Residency Selection Process
 
Research In Action #3
Research In Action #3Research In Action #3
Research In Action #3
 
How Did WE Do? Evaluating the Student Experience
How Did WE Do? Evaluating the Student Experience How Did WE Do? Evaluating the Student Experience
How Did WE Do? Evaluating the Student Experience
 
Research In Action #2
Research In Action #2Research In Action #2
Research In Action #2
 
Strengthening the internship performance review for slideshare
Strengthening the internship performance review for slideshareStrengthening the internship performance review for slideshare
Strengthening the internship performance review for slideshare
 
Evaluating the quality of quality improvement training in healthcare
Evaluating the quality of quality improvement training in healthcareEvaluating the quality of quality improvement training in healthcare
Evaluating the quality of quality improvement training in healthcare
 
Interview with a Nursing Quality EXpert.docx
Interview with a Nursing Quality EXpert.docxInterview with a Nursing Quality EXpert.docx
Interview with a Nursing Quality EXpert.docx
 
Building a Highly Effective Coaching and Mentoring Program at Scale
Building a Highly Effective Coaching and Mentoring Program at ScaleBuilding a Highly Effective Coaching and Mentoring Program at Scale
Building a Highly Effective Coaching and Mentoring Program at Scale
 
A Multidisciplinary Analysis of Research and Performance Synthesis Utilized i...
A Multidisciplinary Analysis of Research and Performance Synthesis Utilized i...A Multidisciplinary Analysis of Research and Performance Synthesis Utilized i...
A Multidisciplinary Analysis of Research and Performance Synthesis Utilized i...
 
Offering Individualized Job Search Results
Offering Individualized Job Search ResultsOffering Individualized Job Search Results
Offering Individualized Job Search Results
 
1CPD researchStudent nameInstructor nameCourse.docx
1CPD researchStudent nameInstructor nameCourse.docx1CPD researchStudent nameInstructor nameCourse.docx
1CPD researchStudent nameInstructor nameCourse.docx
 
Effects of Quantity-Based Staff Performance Indicators on Performance Quality
Effects of Quantity-Based Staff Performance Indicators on Performance QualityEffects of Quantity-Based Staff Performance Indicators on Performance Quality
Effects of Quantity-Based Staff Performance Indicators on Performance Quality
 
Supervising Pgme Facilitators Psych Society Conference August 2009
Supervising Pgme Facilitators Psych Society Conference August 2009Supervising Pgme Facilitators Psych Society Conference August 2009
Supervising Pgme Facilitators Psych Society Conference August 2009
 
GoCrackIt_JIO Institute_10Aug2022 (2).pptx
GoCrackIt_JIO Institute_10Aug2022 (2).pptxGoCrackIt_JIO Institute_10Aug2022 (2).pptx
GoCrackIt_JIO Institute_10Aug2022 (2).pptx
 
UPSC test Series schedule.pdf
UPSC test Series schedule.pdfUPSC test Series schedule.pdf
UPSC test Series schedule.pdf
 

2015 2_CGEA_MOCK_INTERVIEWS

  • 1. Innovations in Simulation: Career Counseling and the Mock Interview Experience during the Fourth Year Alison Martin, MEd, Jennifer Rachow, BHS, Nate Beucke, MD, Dena Higbee, MS, Jen Doty, RN, BSN, Rachel Brown, MD PURPOSE: Creating career counseling resources around writing effective personal statements (PS), creating a concise curriculum vitae (CV), and participation in simulated residency interviews for students entering their M4 year has proven to be a helpful integrated model to assist students with feeling more prepared for the interview season. NEED FOR INNOVATION: With increasing class sizes and stagnant growth in graduate medical education positions the residency match process becomes more competitive each year putting students who are unprepared for residency interviews at a distinct disadvantage. The results of the 2014 NMRP Program Director survey for all specialties show that 93% of programs rate interactions with faculty during interview and interpersonal skills as the two top factors when developing their rank order list. Integrating counseling activities around PS and CV development accompanied with simulated interview practice advances preparation for the high stakes interview experience. COLLABORATION:  Student Services  Career Advising  Surgical Educator  Clinical Simulation Center  Standardized Interviewers  Observers PRE-MOCK INTERVIEW TASKS:  Determine simulation center availability during September & October  Avoid dates w/ academic conflicts  Inform M3s during May class meeting about the mock interview opportunity- highly recommend participation  Request CVs & PSs well in advance for advising critique  Encourage professional attire  Send doodle request for date/time preference to students  Develop interview style scenarios & observation forms  Review and customize potential questions for standardized interviewers based on CV & PS  Recruit/train volunteer interviewers w/ health education experience  Recruit/train staff observers  Confirm video technology/recording POST-MOCK INTERVIEW TASKS:  One observer per interview- 2 interviews total- and interviewer give verbal feedback immediately following each interview  Group debrief with additional interview tips after interviews completed for the day  Evaluation forms collected, scanned & emailed to participants  Video recording made available to participants and observers for additional feedback, if requested  Survey students assessing helpfulness of exercise “Loved getting questions about my CV, because that really simulates a true interview.” Areas for Improvement  Offer the experience over three (3) months (August-October) rather than two (2) months (September-October) making it more accessible for those going through the early match and for those on away rotations.  Critiques of the Personal Statement and Curriculum Vitae shall occur several weeks prior to the interview and are automatic rather than optional. Holistic Admissions Patient-Based Curriculum Career Advising CV Review Personal Statement Review Mock Interviews 2015 99% Match Rate Class of 2015 Outcomes 57 Participants Class of 2014 Outcomes 34 Participants Post Mock Interview Survey n=29 Helpfulness  79% Very Helpful  21% Helpful  0% Somewhat Helpful  0% Somewhat Not Helpful  0% Not Helpful Seemed Realistic  35% Very Realistic  48% Realistic  14% Somewhat Realistic  3% Somewhat Unrealistic  0% Unrealistic Better Prepared for Interviews  65% Very Prepared  28% Prepared  7% Somewhat Prepared  0% Somewhat Unprepared  0% Not Prepared Match National MU 2015 93.9% 99% 2014 94.4% 94% 2013 93.7% 95% 2012 95.1% 92% Background School of Medicine University of Missouri Health System Medicine.missouri.edu Post Mock Interview Survey n=31 Helpfulness  68% Very Helpful  26% Helpful  6% Somewhat Helpful  0% Somewhat Not Helpful  0% Not Helpful Seemed Realistic  36% Very Realistic  42% Realistic  16% Somewhat Realistic  6% Somewhat Unrealistic  0% Unrealistic Better Prepared for Interviews  42% Very Prepared  42% Prepared  16% Somewhat Prepared  0% Somewhat Unprepared  0% Not Prepared Methods