This document is a presentation by New Pacific Metals Corp. about its Tagish Lake Gold Property in Yukon, Canada. It summarizes the property's history of past production and exploration, current resources estimated under NI 43-101 standards, and outlines an exploration program and capital budget for 2012. It also provides details on the management team and financial position of the company. The presentation aims to profile the property and company as an opportunity to develop a high-grade, near-term gold producer.

1. www.newpacificmetals.com

2. PRESENTATION IS ONLY A SERVICE
This presentation is not intended as a solicitation or offering of securities in any jurisdiction and the information contained herein in no
way should be construed or interpreted as such. No securities commission or other regulatory authority in Canada or any other country or
jurisdiction has in any way passed upon this information and no representation or warranty is made by New Pacific Metals Corp. (“New
Pacific”) to that effect. The information in this presentation is not intended to modify, qualify, supplement or amend information disclosed
under corporate and securities legislation of any jurisdiction applicable to New Pacific and should not be used for the purpose of making
investment decisions concerning New Pacific securities.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD‐LOOKING STATEMENTS
This presentation contains “forward‐looking statements”, within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995 and applicable Canadian securities legislation, concerning the business, operations and financial performance and condition of New
Pacific. Forward‐looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements with respect to the future price of gold and silver, the
estimation of mineral reserves and resources, the realization of mineral reserve estimates, the timing and amount of estimated future
production, costs of production, capital expenditures, success of exploration activities, requirements for additional capital, government
regulation of mining operations, environmental risks, title disputes or claims and limitations on insurance coverage. Generally, these
forward‐looking statements can be identified by the use of forward‐looking terminology such as “plans”, “expects”, “is expected”, “budget”,
“scheduled”, “estimates”, “forecasts”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “believes” or variations of such words and phrases or statements that certain
actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will be taken”, “occur” or “be achieved” or the negative connotation thereof.
Forward‐looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that may cause the actual
results, level of activity, performance or achievements of New Pacific to be materially different from those expressed or implied by such
forward‐looking statements; see a list of risk factors in the section titled “Description of the Business – Risk Factors” in New Pacific’s annual
information form available at www.sedar.com. Although New Pacific has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those contained in forward‐looking statements, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as
anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future
events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward‐
looking statements.
Albert Siega, P.Eng, Vice‐President Mining is a “Qualified Person” within the meaning of National Instrument 43‐101 ‐ Standards of
Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43‐101”) who supervised the preparation of the scientific and technical information of NUX included in
this presentation. 2

3. Board of Directors and Key Management
Dr. Rui Feng – CEO & Director
A diversified background in of mineral exploration in Canada and abroad, including extensive experience in
exploration and development of high‐grade underground mines, also Chairman & CEO of Silvercorp Metals Inc.
(SVM: TSX/NYSE).
The Honourable Jack Austin – Chairman
Jack Austin has over 40 years of experience in law, business, public service and politics. Mr. Austin has had a
diversified career and has expertise in cross‐cultural communications and business development.
Greg Hawkins – Director
Greg Hawkins has been involved in the mining exploration and investment industry since 1969. He has
contributed to the identification and/or delineation of 10 mineral deposits. He has been the founding project
consultant and/or founding director of seven public and private exploration/development ventures.
David Kong – Director
Mr. Kong earned his Chartered Accountant designation in British Columbia and was a partner of Ellis Foster
Chartered Accountants, between 1981 and 2004, and a partner of Ernst & Young LLP from 2005 to 2010.
Dr. Robert Kerrich– Director
Dr. Kerrich has 30 years consulting experience in the mineral industry on gold and base metals and has been
the George McLeod research chair at the Department of Geological Sciences of the University of Saskatchewan.
3

4. New Pacific Metals Corp. – Building the Next Silvercorp
• Dr. Rui Feng, CEO of New Pacific, built Silvercorp from a market capitalization of
$14 million in 2005 to more than $2‐billion in 6 years by focusing on bringing
projects into profitable production before their potential is drilled off, thereby
using cash flow to fund growth and expansion
• New Pacific will follow a similar approach of developing projects with potential to
generate early cash flow, then using cash flow to finance resource addition and
production growth
• Tagish Lake Gold Property fits into this strategy in the following ways:
1) Known zones of high grade gold‐silver resources
2) Existing infrastructure, mill and underground development
3) Easy access and mining friendly Yukon
4) Sufficient funds on hand
5) A strong team of North American professionals
4

5. NUX Share Structure
NUX shares issued & outstanding: 67.3 million
Warrants @ $2.00 9.0 million
Options 3.4 million
Fully diluted 79.7 million
NUX Financial Position
Cash & short term investments $42.5 million
No long term debt
5

6. Cost
FY2012 Capital Program ($million)
Drilling
Exploration program:
(metre)
Goddell 23,000 $4.4
Underground drilling:
Skukum Creek 13,000 $3.1
Surface drilling & Raca 5,500
$4.6
geophysics*: Other areas 18,500
Total 60,000 $12.1
Permitting $0.85
Surface Infrastructure $0.68
Equipment $1.4
General operations $1.5
Total $16.5
*Includes airborne geophysical survey of 1,000 line km and ground survey of 40 line km
6

7. Tagish Lake Gold Property
• District scale 178 km2
mineral claims located
~80 km from Whitehorse,
Yukon (a one hour drive)
• Two advanced‐stage gold
(±silver) deposits and past‐
producing Mt. Skukum
Mine
• MOU in place with
Carcross/Tagish First
Nation
7

8. Tagish Lake Gold Property History
• Mt. Skukum Mine operated from 1986 to 1988 producing 77,796 oz gold
• 129,059 m of surface & underground diamond drilling
• 4,830 m of tunnels completed, providing access to ore bodies
• Resources open in all directions, plus other identified targets to be drilled
• 300 t/d mill plus tailing reclamation site on the property
NI 43‐101 Resources, Tagish Lake Gold Property (2007)
Resource Tonnes Gold (g/t) Silver (g/t) Au Equivalent
Category (oz)
Measured 195,000 5.8 240.0 66,000
Indicated 1,240,000 7.6 123.5 402,000
Measured + 1,435,000 7.4 139.3 468,000
Indicated
Inferred 516,000 8.0 61.9 153,000
Au:Ag ratio 50:1, cut‐off grade Au > 4g/t 8

9. 9

11. Skukum Creek Project
• 1300 Level Portal provides access to high
grade starter pockets of gold‐silver
resources that can be mined with
minimum development requirement
11

12. NI 43‐101 Resources of Skukum Creek Project (2007)
Resource Tonnes Gold Silver Gold Equivalent
Category (g/t) (g/t) (oz)
Measured 195,000 5.8 240 66,000
Indicated 880,000 6.5 174 282,000
Measured + 1,075,000 6.4 186 349,000
Indicated
Inferred 206,000 6.8 155 66,000
Au:Ag ratio 50:1, cut‐off grade Au > 4g/t
12

13. 13

14. 14

15. Skukum Creek Project
• Gold‐Silver mineralization is
related to the pyrite‐galena‐
sphalerite‐quartz breccia
zones developed in granite
• High grade gold‐silver ore
bodies pinch‐swell in the
breccia zone down dip and
along strike
• Mineralization extends over
400 m down dip and is open
at depth
15

16. Surface Drilling at Skukum Creek Goddell Portal
16

17. 17

18. 18

19. Goddell Project
• Gold mineralization formed along two
rhyolite dykes (G.G. Zone and P.D.
Zone)
• New interpretation of drill hole cross
sections suggests that the P.D. Zone
and G.G. Zone merge at depth
• Gold mineralization intensifies in the
“Merged Zone”, yielding a thicker
mineralized interval
• Both the upper P.D. Zone (above G.G.
Zone) and the “Merged Zone” remain
largely untested and open in all
directions
NEW PACIFIC METALS CORP.
TAGISH LAKE GOLD PROPERTY
YUKON, CANADA
19

20. Drill Interval Comparison, P.D. Zone
CME Results Re‐Calculated Results CME Results Re‐Calculated Results
Hole From To Interval Gold From To Interval True Gold Hole From To Interval Gold From To Interval True Gold
(m) (m) (m) (g/t) (m) (m) (m) Thckness (g/t) (m) (m) (m) (g/t) (m) (m) (m) Thckness (g/t)
483.20 486.20 3.00 11.59 218.95 219.66 0.71 5.93
97‐40 215.64 232.50 16.86 9.95 3.08
88‐PG2 489.30 490.80 1.50 9.98 480.20 516.80 36.60 20.74 5.20 225.33 228.99 3.66 10.03
498.40 515.30 16.90 8.35 152.76 153.93 1.17 8.81
463.80 464.00 0.20 23.45 97‐41 156.91 158.28 1.37 8.57 125.14 189.83 64.69 38.42 5.75
88‐PG3 463.80 506.20 42.40 26.13 6.23
493.50 504.80 11.30 20.80 170.65 185.32 14.67 20.35
97‐43 173.77 176.38 2.61 7.35 165.34 182.70 17.36 13.00 2.84
95‐24 452.58 459.50 6.92 13.70 446.88 460.50 13.62 6.43 7.39 128.90 130.70 1.80 13.16
97‐46 125.70 151.80 26.10 21.76 1.84
144.45 145.70 1.25 5.18
94.39 95.63 1.24 13.65 133.60 139.10 5.50 16.72
97‐47 124.35 143.10 18.75 13.60 5.52
101.53 102.80 1.27 22.80 97‐50 208.50 216.10 7.60 8.04 203.90 216.10 12.20 9.14 5.51
96‐29 94.39 134.68 40.29 36.37 3.84
105.91 107.28 1.37 18.21 185.45 187.23 1.78 15.28
127.39 134.68 7.29 9.97 192.42 193.29 0.87 5.73
97‐51 184.37 221.89 37.52 20.99 4.16
147.38 171.41 24.03 5.84 195.51 217.95 22.44 5.16
97‐32 132.28 180.87 48.59 35.63 3.81 220.05 220.79 0.74 7.89
177.16 178.27 1.11 10.15
97‐56 272.49 275.40 2.91 8.49 260.29 280.11 19.82 17.74 2.37
97‐33B 151.24 174.52 23.28 5.42 145.46 175.99 30.53 21.14 4.45
138.70 143.25 4.55 9.81
165.16 168.36 3.20 5.92 97‐57 128.00 150.70 22.70 22.16 3.89
148.40 149.05 0.65 7.95
97‐34 180.44 181.11 0.67 6.86 161.75 196.29 34.54 22.70 2.25
183.25 184.75 1.50 16.77
190.95 195.14 4.19 8.49 97‐58 183.25 194.25 11.00 9.07 7.03
187.85 194.25 6.40 7.27
129.90 130.90 1.00 5.55
146.20 147.25 1.05 13.44
97‐35 141.90 149.90 8.00 18.15 128.90 160.60 31.70 27.89 5.59 97‐59 133.15 165.95 32.80 28.83 7.94
158.90 162.50 3.60 62.98
159.50 160.60 1.10 7.37 181.75 182.50 0.75 11.18
163.50 176.50 13.00 11.07 97‐60 152.58 188.78 36.20 30.53 1.23
187.20 188.78 1.58 7.41
97‐36 190.93 192.32 1.39 11.76 162.28 200.86 38.58 28.35 4.89 97‐61 152.40 158.50 6.10 9.12 128.90 172.80 43.94 39.98 2.42
197.50 198.20 0.70 12.79 97‐63 156.10 159.90 3.80 11.15 156.10 164.63 8.53 8.29 5.17
104.85 105.37 0.52 6.79 133.50 135.20 1.70 6.38
97‐37 104.85 140.74 35.89 32.99 1.41
138.00 140.17 2.17 7.13 140.90 141.75 0.85 5.14
150.91 152.32 1.41 37.90 97‐64 131.75 170.15 38.40 36.62 1.29
161.90 162.70 0.80 5.66
157.90 158.90 1.00 9.81
97‐38 148.18 179.22 31.04 24.47 6.34 165.40 166.70 1.30 8.26
162.15 168.50 6.35 15.74
174.01 175.02 1.01 12.38 97‐65 188.70 189.90 1.20 10.73 174.10 191.30 17.20 14.51 1.94
225.37 226.25 0.88 18.55 97‐67 191.90 195.45 3.55 11.41 174.05 196.65 22.60 17.03 2.34
97‐39 234.63 235.58 0.95 27.91 223.32 240.01 16.69 10.66 3.09 338.27 338.88 0.61 8.88
238.14 238.53 0.39 6.62 90‐GT6 337.23 341.62 4.39 2.84 2.16
341.32 341.62 0.30 11.18

21. Goddell Project Drill Interval Re‐Calculation
• New interpretation indicates that:
– only three surface holes and 26 underground holes intercepted the
“Merged Zone”
– only one surface drill hole (90‐GT6) intercepted the up‐dip extension
of the P.D. Zone
• The assay intervals for the 30 holes were re‐calculated and the most
significant intercepts for the “Merged Zone” or P.D. Zone are:
– Hole 97‐41 intercepted 64.7 m grading 5.75 g/t gold
– Hole 88‐PG3 intercepted 42.4 m grading 6.23 g/t gold
– Hole 97‐59 intercepted 32.8 m grading 7.94 g/t gold
– Hole 97‐35 intercepted 31.7 m grading 5.59 g/t gold
21

22. Lake Zone
22

23. 23

24. 24

25. LEGEND Charleston Vein
Tertiary
Rhyolite dyke
Andesite dyke
Cretaceous
Granodiorite
Proterozoic‐Paleozoic(?)
Schist
SYMBOLS
Vein ‐ defined, approximate
Rock sample (in situ)
Rock sample (float)
25

26. Tagish Lake Gold Property, 2011 Plans
1. Apply for new Yukon exploration permits for 2011 to 2016.
2. Carry out 60,000 metre underground and surface drilling program:
Goddell: 23,000 m underground drilling
Skukum Creek: 13,000 m underground drilling
Raca: 5,500 surface drilling
other areas: 18,500 m surface drilling
3. Initiate Environmental Assessment Study to support a Quartz Mining
License application for a 300 t/d operation with possible expansion to
450 t/d and then 600 t/d in 2 successive phases.
4. Consultations leading to a Development Agreement with Carcross/
Tagish First Nation.
26

27. Update on 2011 drilling program:
‐ Currently, one surface drill rig is drilling at the Raca & Chieftain Hill areas, a
second surface drill rig is at the Goddell area, and an underground drill rig is
operating at the Skukum Creek underground tunnel.
‐ First step out surface drill‐hole (Raca 11‐01) at Raca site intercepted 1,280 g/t
Ag, 1.9 g/t Au over 1.58 m. (See August 2, 2011 press release for details.)
‐ Once de‐watering is successfully completed at Goddell (mid‐August) a second
underground rig will be brought to the site for drilling.
27

28. Contact Information:
Investor Relations
Tel: 604‐633‐1368
Fax: 604‐669‐9387
E‐mail: info@newpacificmetals.com
Visit our website at:
www.newpacificmetals.com