This document provides information about developer contributions through Section 106 obligations, the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL), and the New Homes Bonus. It discusses the tests for Section 106 contributions and when CIL can apply. It also outlines the process for setting a CIL rate, including identifying infrastructure needs, viability evidence, and balancing funding with development viability. Exemptions, spending requirements, and governance are also summarized. Lewes District Council is undertaking technical work to inform future CIL charging schedules. The New Homes Bonus provides financial incentives for new housing but is being offset by cuts to local authority funding from central government.
Jim Cliffe - Viability - A local authority perspectivePAS_Team
This document provides a local authority perspective on viability assessments and implementing community infrastructure levy (CIL) rates. It discusses Bristol City Council's approach to setting simple and generous CIL rates. It also outlines a three-stage process for site-specific viability appraisals, and notes that government policies and rising costs and land values can impact the amount of affordable housing secured. Challenging brownfield sites and increasing development values do not always result in policy-compliant affordable housing levels being achieved.
Viability Session 4: You have viability evidence – so what?PAS_Team
This document discusses various stages of engagement with developers regarding viability assessments for local plans. It recommends conducting viability assessments in 3 stages:
1) Establishing methodology and assumptions without sharing results.
2) Sharing draft results, emerging conclusions, and potential policy changes based on feedback from the first stage.
3) Sharing full results and discussing factors other than viability to consider in finalizing policy. The document stresses recording engagement meticulously and establishing agreement on assumptions in the first stage.
Alan Benson GLA Presentation on London Housing Strategy (15 Jan 2013)lvscsteve
This document summarizes London's draft housing strategy and funding prospectus for 2015-2018. It aims to increase housing supply to over 42,000 new homes per year, including 15,000 affordable homes and 5,000 long-term private rental homes. The funding package totals over £1 billion to support affordable housing delivery. The strategy addresses London's growing population, affordability crisis, and increased housing needs through increasing supply, improving quality, supporting workers, and meeting needs like reducing homelessness.
This document provides information about section 106 (s106) planning obligations in the UK. It discusses:
- The purpose of s106 obligations to make development acceptable and mitigate impacts through items like affordable housing and infrastructure funding.
- Viability considerations and how much development can afford based on available funding. S106 obligations must meet legal tests of being necessary, related to development, and fair/reasonable.
- Recent changes lowering affordable housing thresholds and allowing vacant building credits to reduce obligations.
- Appeals processes for developers to renegotiate obligations based on viability, and examples of outcomes.
- Guidance on transparency around viability assessments and confidentiality in legal cases.
- Monitoring fees for obligations and a case finding they
Funding our future community presentation 21012014 fina_lpptxmaitlandyoursay
The document summarizes a community presentation about revising Maitland City Council's Delivery Program. It outlines that a special rate variation is needed due to a projected $92 million funding shortfall. Community consultation showed support for maintaining services. The revised Delivery Program focuses on infrastructure like roads, footpaths, and sporting facilities. It was developed through extensive community and stakeholder engagement. The Operational Plan and budget for 2014-15 were incorporated to implement the Delivery Program.
Public hearing presentation howard hartrey tif final 10.28.13cityofevanston
The document summarizes the proposed expansion of the Howard/Hartrey Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District in Evanston, Illinois. The TIF district was originally established in 1992 to redevelop industrial property and encourage commercial redevelopment. The expansion is proposed to redevelop a property at 222 Hartrey Avenue and improve local infrastructure before the existing TIF expires in 2015. The document reviews the TIF qualification factors and financing process, and outlines the next steps which include introducing and adopting ordinances related to the TIF expansion.
The document outlines Lancaster City's Revitalization and Improvement Zone Program, which will establish a special tax district (CRIZ) to fund development projects through bonds. The CRIZ Authority will issue bonds backed by new state/local tax revenues from projects and businesses in up to 130 acres of targeted areas. Bond proceeds will finance projects creating jobs and tax revenues like commercial redevelopment. The program aims to redevelop vacant/underused sites to attract businesses and jobs to Lancaster City.
Jim Cliffe - Viability - A local authority perspectivePAS_Team
This document provides a local authority perspective on viability assessments and implementing community infrastructure levy (CIL) rates. It discusses Bristol City Council's approach to setting simple and generous CIL rates. It also outlines a three-stage process for site-specific viability appraisals, and notes that government policies and rising costs and land values can impact the amount of affordable housing secured. Challenging brownfield sites and increasing development values do not always result in policy-compliant affordable housing levels being achieved.
Viability Session 4: You have viability evidence – so what?PAS_Team
This document discusses various stages of engagement with developers regarding viability assessments for local plans. It recommends conducting viability assessments in 3 stages:
1) Establishing methodology and assumptions without sharing results.
2) Sharing draft results, emerging conclusions, and potential policy changes based on feedback from the first stage.
3) Sharing full results and discussing factors other than viability to consider in finalizing policy. The document stresses recording engagement meticulously and establishing agreement on assumptions in the first stage.
Alan Benson GLA Presentation on London Housing Strategy (15 Jan 2013)lvscsteve
This document summarizes London's draft housing strategy and funding prospectus for 2015-2018. It aims to increase housing supply to over 42,000 new homes per year, including 15,000 affordable homes and 5,000 long-term private rental homes. The funding package totals over £1 billion to support affordable housing delivery. The strategy addresses London's growing population, affordability crisis, and increased housing needs through increasing supply, improving quality, supporting workers, and meeting needs like reducing homelessness.
This document provides information about section 106 (s106) planning obligations in the UK. It discusses:
- The purpose of s106 obligations to make development acceptable and mitigate impacts through items like affordable housing and infrastructure funding.
- Viability considerations and how much development can afford based on available funding. S106 obligations must meet legal tests of being necessary, related to development, and fair/reasonable.
- Recent changes lowering affordable housing thresholds and allowing vacant building credits to reduce obligations.
- Appeals processes for developers to renegotiate obligations based on viability, and examples of outcomes.
- Guidance on transparency around viability assessments and confidentiality in legal cases.
- Monitoring fees for obligations and a case finding they
Funding our future community presentation 21012014 fina_lpptxmaitlandyoursay
The document summarizes a community presentation about revising Maitland City Council's Delivery Program. It outlines that a special rate variation is needed due to a projected $92 million funding shortfall. Community consultation showed support for maintaining services. The revised Delivery Program focuses on infrastructure like roads, footpaths, and sporting facilities. It was developed through extensive community and stakeholder engagement. The Operational Plan and budget for 2014-15 were incorporated to implement the Delivery Program.
Public hearing presentation howard hartrey tif final 10.28.13cityofevanston
The document summarizes the proposed expansion of the Howard/Hartrey Tax Increment Financing (TIF) District in Evanston, Illinois. The TIF district was originally established in 1992 to redevelop industrial property and encourage commercial redevelopment. The expansion is proposed to redevelop a property at 222 Hartrey Avenue and improve local infrastructure before the existing TIF expires in 2015. The document reviews the TIF qualification factors and financing process, and outlines the next steps which include introducing and adopting ordinances related to the TIF expansion.
The document outlines Lancaster City's Revitalization and Improvement Zone Program, which will establish a special tax district (CRIZ) to fund development projects through bonds. The CRIZ Authority will issue bonds backed by new state/local tax revenues from projects and businesses in up to 130 acres of targeted areas. Bond proceeds will finance projects creating jobs and tax revenues like commercial redevelopment. The program aims to redevelop vacant/underused sites to attract businesses and jobs to Lancaster City.
Lewes District Council - Business Rates and Council Tax - Town & Parish Confe...LewesDistrictCouncil
The document discusses proposals for business rates retention and localizing support for council tax in the UK. It proposes that local authorities will retain a portion of business rates collected locally and be given new powers over council tax discounts and exemptions. This is expected to impact council tax bases and the amounts collected locally versus nationally. Concerns are raised about the impacts on vulnerable groups from reduced support and the disproportionate effects on the working poor.
Town & Parish Conference - The Role of the Sussex Police Crime Commissioner -...LewesDistrictCouncil
The Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner sets the strategic direction for Sussex Police through the Police and Crime Plan. The Commissioner is responsible for holding the Chief Constable accountable, deciding the budget, and hiring or firing the Chief Constable. The Commissioner aims to increase public confidence through initiatives to increase police visibility and improve services for victims. Key priorities include tackling serious sexual offending, cybercrime, and developing mobile technology for police.
Town & Parish Conference - Customer Focus - Lewes District CouncilLewesDistrictCouncil
The document discusses plans to reshape council services to put customers first through a "One District One Council" vision. It aims to modernize operations in response to national pressures and local needs by streamlining structures, focusing on frontline delivery through mixed service teams, and improving customer service, contacts and monitoring. Feedback is sought from town and parish councils on better delivering responsive local services through stronger partnerships.
Lewes District Council - Sussex Police - Town & Parish Conference 2012LewesDistrictCouncil
This document summarizes the work of Sussex Police in 2015, which included major events like the Diamond Jubilee celebrations and Olympics, as well as operations related to conferences, bonfire season, and domestic abuse. It discusses the police force's focus on customer service, collaboration, modernizing facilities and information access, transparency, and adapting to workforce trends. The document also provides details about implementing a mobile working project to give officers mobile access to information in the field in order to improve decision making, resource allocation, and streamline processes.
Lewes District Council - Community Engagement - Town & Parish Conference 2012LewesDistrictCouncil
The document outlines a community engagement plan for the Lewes District. It discusses establishing governance rules for collaboration software, exploring liaisons between the local council and town/parish councils, and developing methods for better targeting information and consultations. Priority tasks include setting up pilot schools/colleges projects, producing templates for civic groups, and supporting local innovations in community engagement. It also describes new "Community Right to Bid" powers giving community groups time to develop bids to buy listed community assets being sold.
Town & Parish Conference - Paying For Open Spaces - Lewes District CouncilLewesDistrictCouncil
The document discusses double taxation for paying for open spaces at the local level. It notes that while double taxation may never be fully solved, the aim should be to make local taxation as fair as possible. There is no single correct solution and different approaches suit different local circumstances. The issue of double taxation should not be ignored or swept under the rug. The document also provides data on special expenses and grants provided to town and parish councils for 2013-2014 and projected for 2014-2015.
What happens when the digital tools and platforms we make and use for communication and entertainment are hijacked for terrorism, violence against the vulnerable and nefarious transactions? What role do designers and developers play? Are we complicit as creators of these technologies and products? Should we police them or fight back? As Portfolio Lead for Northern Lab, Northern Trust's internal innovation startup focused on client and partner experience, Antonio will share a mix of provocative scenarios torn from today's headlines and compelling stories where activism and technology facilitated peace—and war.
As a call-to-action for designers and developers to engage in projects capable of transformational change, he'll explore the question: How might technology foster new experiences to better accelerate social activism and make the world a smarter, safer place?
Developer Payments- Community Infrastructure Levy, S106 agreements and Viabil...PAS_Team
With less than a year until local authorities will be unable to pool (five or more) s106 obligations for a single project or scheme there is an immediacy for many to get a CIL in place. This presentation will help you to understand the relevance of viability and it will help you to understand the role for the Community Infrastructure Levy and other developer payments.
The document provides an overview of developer contributions through the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) and Section 106 planning obligations. It discusses when viability assessments are needed, the basic elements considered in assessments, and choices local authorities have regarding developer contributions. It also summarizes CIL in more detail, including how it is set and charged, spending requirements, and considerations for local authorities in implementing CIL.
Developer Payments Community Infrastructure Levy & ViabilityPAS_Team
These seminars are particularly designed for councillors (in England) but officers who wish an overview of developer payments in light of a significant legislation and guidance changes over the last few years should find it beneficial. - See more at: http://www.pas.gov.uk/events/-/journal_content/56/332612/6555744/ARTICLE#sthash.NIWWOLkl.dpuf
Councillor briefing - Developer contributions - Community Infrastructure Levy...PAS_Team
This document provides an overview of developer contributions through Section 106 obligations and the Community Infrastructure Levy. It discusses when viability should be considered, the basic elements of viability assessments, and the types of developer contributions including S106 obligations and CIL. It also addresses recent changes to policies around affordable housing thresholds, vacant building credits, and starter homes. The document emphasizes the importance of infrastructure planning, viability evidence, and stakeholder engagement when implementing CIL.
The Community-Infrastructure-Levy - round table meetingLewis Silkin
The document discusses the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL), which was introduced to support infrastructure delivery through a non-negotiable tax on new development. It provides an overview of CIL basics, including how local authorities must prepare charging schedules and how liability arises. Concerns are raised about the overlap with Section 106 agreements and achieving the appropriate balance between collecting enough funds through CIL without impacting viability. The Mayor of London's CIL is also discussed as intended to raise funds for Crossrail.
Developer Payments- Community Infrastructure Levy, S106 agreements and Viabil...PAS_Team
This document provides an overview and discussion of developer contributions through the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) and Section 106 planning obligations. It discusses when viability assessments should be considered, the basic elements of viability assessments, and tests for Section 106 obligations. It also addresses timing regulations for Section 106 and CIL, delivery and viability of development, renegotiation of Section 106 agreements, and appeals. Key points discussed include setting CIL rates, why local authorities should implement CIL, and the potential economic effects of CIL.
Cil birmingham presentation - 19 jan 2012 (2)Niicole93
Vail Williams LLP presented on the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) and development appraisals. CIL allows local authorities to charge developers per square meter to fund infrastructure. Rates vary significantly between authorities. CIL aims to provide a fairer system than section 106 agreements but adds costs. Development appraisals assess scheme viability considering values, costs, and market conditions to determine profitability and ability to pay CIL/section 106. Current market conditions make many types of development unviable outside of select areas like London.
This document provides an overview of Wokingham Borough Council's experience implementing the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). It discusses WBC's adopted CIL rates, which are among the highest in the country. It also describes how CIL and section 106 agreements are used to fund infrastructure for strategic development locations, with CIL funding major transport and education projects and S106 providing on-site infrastructure. The document outlines WBC's governance structure for overseeing infrastructure delivery and allocating CIL funds. It acknowledges some challenges implementing CIL and working with parish councils on spending the neighborhood portion of funds.
This document discusses the pros and cons of two approaches to funding infrastructure from new developments: Section 106 planning obligations and the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). While S106 can slow down the planning process and lacks transparency, CIL provides a fairer, faster, and more certain system through a fixed levy per square meter of new development. The document also notes that over 100 local authorities in the UK have adopted CIL and reviews its effectiveness, including exempting 'starter homes' from CIL charges.
Wycombe District Council has received over £4.5 million from its Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) since 2012, which is used to fund infrastructure projects like transport improvements, town centers, education, and public realm spaces. CIL provides relatively simple and certain funding compared to section 106 agreements. Funds are allocated every 3 years and spent according to the Infrastructure Delivery Plan and approved strategies. Challenges include balancing developer certainty with flexibility for strategic site requirements.
This document outlines the Community Development Division's PY 2017 Action Plan and Budget. It provides information on funding sources like CDBG and HOME, eligible activities, and national objectives. The budget allocates funds to projects like owner-occupied rehabilitation, demolition, homebuyer assistance, and public services. It also recommends specific funding amounts for public service agencies and public facility projects. The division is requesting approval of this plan and budget at the August 10th city council meeting to meet HUD's August 16th deadline.
Your approach to the on-going use of S106 and S278 impacts on: Viability evidence, Infrastructure evidence and the Regulation 123 list - so it's very important!
The Productivity Commission has released a draft report into the processes that New Zealand’s fastest growing cities use to provide land for housing. The report finds that more could be done to enable cities to accommodate growing populations and includes 38 draft recommendations.
Lewes District Council - Business Rates and Council Tax - Town & Parish Confe...LewesDistrictCouncil
The document discusses proposals for business rates retention and localizing support for council tax in the UK. It proposes that local authorities will retain a portion of business rates collected locally and be given new powers over council tax discounts and exemptions. This is expected to impact council tax bases and the amounts collected locally versus nationally. Concerns are raised about the impacts on vulnerable groups from reduced support and the disproportionate effects on the working poor.
Town & Parish Conference - The Role of the Sussex Police Crime Commissioner -...LewesDistrictCouncil
The Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner sets the strategic direction for Sussex Police through the Police and Crime Plan. The Commissioner is responsible for holding the Chief Constable accountable, deciding the budget, and hiring or firing the Chief Constable. The Commissioner aims to increase public confidence through initiatives to increase police visibility and improve services for victims. Key priorities include tackling serious sexual offending, cybercrime, and developing mobile technology for police.
Town & Parish Conference - Customer Focus - Lewes District CouncilLewesDistrictCouncil
The document discusses plans to reshape council services to put customers first through a "One District One Council" vision. It aims to modernize operations in response to national pressures and local needs by streamlining structures, focusing on frontline delivery through mixed service teams, and improving customer service, contacts and monitoring. Feedback is sought from town and parish councils on better delivering responsive local services through stronger partnerships.
Lewes District Council - Sussex Police - Town & Parish Conference 2012LewesDistrictCouncil
This document summarizes the work of Sussex Police in 2015, which included major events like the Diamond Jubilee celebrations and Olympics, as well as operations related to conferences, bonfire season, and domestic abuse. It discusses the police force's focus on customer service, collaboration, modernizing facilities and information access, transparency, and adapting to workforce trends. The document also provides details about implementing a mobile working project to give officers mobile access to information in the field in order to improve decision making, resource allocation, and streamline processes.
Lewes District Council - Community Engagement - Town & Parish Conference 2012LewesDistrictCouncil
The document outlines a community engagement plan for the Lewes District. It discusses establishing governance rules for collaboration software, exploring liaisons between the local council and town/parish councils, and developing methods for better targeting information and consultations. Priority tasks include setting up pilot schools/colleges projects, producing templates for civic groups, and supporting local innovations in community engagement. It also describes new "Community Right to Bid" powers giving community groups time to develop bids to buy listed community assets being sold.
Town & Parish Conference - Paying For Open Spaces - Lewes District CouncilLewesDistrictCouncil
The document discusses double taxation for paying for open spaces at the local level. It notes that while double taxation may never be fully solved, the aim should be to make local taxation as fair as possible. There is no single correct solution and different approaches suit different local circumstances. The issue of double taxation should not be ignored or swept under the rug. The document also provides data on special expenses and grants provided to town and parish councils for 2013-2014 and projected for 2014-2015.
What happens when the digital tools and platforms we make and use for communication and entertainment are hijacked for terrorism, violence against the vulnerable and nefarious transactions? What role do designers and developers play? Are we complicit as creators of these technologies and products? Should we police them or fight back? As Portfolio Lead for Northern Lab, Northern Trust's internal innovation startup focused on client and partner experience, Antonio will share a mix of provocative scenarios torn from today's headlines and compelling stories where activism and technology facilitated peace—and war.
As a call-to-action for designers and developers to engage in projects capable of transformational change, he'll explore the question: How might technology foster new experiences to better accelerate social activism and make the world a smarter, safer place?
Developer Payments- Community Infrastructure Levy, S106 agreements and Viabil...PAS_Team
With less than a year until local authorities will be unable to pool (five or more) s106 obligations for a single project or scheme there is an immediacy for many to get a CIL in place. This presentation will help you to understand the relevance of viability and it will help you to understand the role for the Community Infrastructure Levy and other developer payments.
The document provides an overview of developer contributions through the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) and Section 106 planning obligations. It discusses when viability assessments are needed, the basic elements considered in assessments, and choices local authorities have regarding developer contributions. It also summarizes CIL in more detail, including how it is set and charged, spending requirements, and considerations for local authorities in implementing CIL.
Developer Payments Community Infrastructure Levy & ViabilityPAS_Team
These seminars are particularly designed for councillors (in England) but officers who wish an overview of developer payments in light of a significant legislation and guidance changes over the last few years should find it beneficial. - See more at: http://www.pas.gov.uk/events/-/journal_content/56/332612/6555744/ARTICLE#sthash.NIWWOLkl.dpuf
Councillor briefing - Developer contributions - Community Infrastructure Levy...PAS_Team
This document provides an overview of developer contributions through Section 106 obligations and the Community Infrastructure Levy. It discusses when viability should be considered, the basic elements of viability assessments, and the types of developer contributions including S106 obligations and CIL. It also addresses recent changes to policies around affordable housing thresholds, vacant building credits, and starter homes. The document emphasizes the importance of infrastructure planning, viability evidence, and stakeholder engagement when implementing CIL.
The Community-Infrastructure-Levy - round table meetingLewis Silkin
The document discusses the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL), which was introduced to support infrastructure delivery through a non-negotiable tax on new development. It provides an overview of CIL basics, including how local authorities must prepare charging schedules and how liability arises. Concerns are raised about the overlap with Section 106 agreements and achieving the appropriate balance between collecting enough funds through CIL without impacting viability. The Mayor of London's CIL is also discussed as intended to raise funds for Crossrail.
Developer Payments- Community Infrastructure Levy, S106 agreements and Viabil...PAS_Team
This document provides an overview and discussion of developer contributions through the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) and Section 106 planning obligations. It discusses when viability assessments should be considered, the basic elements of viability assessments, and tests for Section 106 obligations. It also addresses timing regulations for Section 106 and CIL, delivery and viability of development, renegotiation of Section 106 agreements, and appeals. Key points discussed include setting CIL rates, why local authorities should implement CIL, and the potential economic effects of CIL.
Cil birmingham presentation - 19 jan 2012 (2)Niicole93
Vail Williams LLP presented on the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) and development appraisals. CIL allows local authorities to charge developers per square meter to fund infrastructure. Rates vary significantly between authorities. CIL aims to provide a fairer system than section 106 agreements but adds costs. Development appraisals assess scheme viability considering values, costs, and market conditions to determine profitability and ability to pay CIL/section 106. Current market conditions make many types of development unviable outside of select areas like London.
This document provides an overview of Wokingham Borough Council's experience implementing the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). It discusses WBC's adopted CIL rates, which are among the highest in the country. It also describes how CIL and section 106 agreements are used to fund infrastructure for strategic development locations, with CIL funding major transport and education projects and S106 providing on-site infrastructure. The document outlines WBC's governance structure for overseeing infrastructure delivery and allocating CIL funds. It acknowledges some challenges implementing CIL and working with parish councils on spending the neighborhood portion of funds.
This document discusses the pros and cons of two approaches to funding infrastructure from new developments: Section 106 planning obligations and the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). While S106 can slow down the planning process and lacks transparency, CIL provides a fairer, faster, and more certain system through a fixed levy per square meter of new development. The document also notes that over 100 local authorities in the UK have adopted CIL and reviews its effectiveness, including exempting 'starter homes' from CIL charges.
Wycombe District Council has received over £4.5 million from its Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) since 2012, which is used to fund infrastructure projects like transport improvements, town centers, education, and public realm spaces. CIL provides relatively simple and certain funding compared to section 106 agreements. Funds are allocated every 3 years and spent according to the Infrastructure Delivery Plan and approved strategies. Challenges include balancing developer certainty with flexibility for strategic site requirements.
This document outlines the Community Development Division's PY 2017 Action Plan and Budget. It provides information on funding sources like CDBG and HOME, eligible activities, and national objectives. The budget allocates funds to projects like owner-occupied rehabilitation, demolition, homebuyer assistance, and public services. It also recommends specific funding amounts for public service agencies and public facility projects. The division is requesting approval of this plan and budget at the August 10th city council meeting to meet HUD's August 16th deadline.
Your approach to the on-going use of S106 and S278 impacts on: Viability evidence, Infrastructure evidence and the Regulation 123 list - so it's very important!
The Productivity Commission has released a draft report into the processes that New Zealand’s fastest growing cities use to provide land for housing. The report finds that more could be done to enable cities to accommodate growing populations and includes 38 draft recommendations.
This document provides information about section 106 (s106) planning obligations in the UK. It discusses:
- The purpose of s106 obligations to make development acceptable and mitigate impacts through items like affordable housing and infrastructure funding.
- Viability considerations and how much development can afford based on available funding. S106 obligations must meet legal tests of being necessary, related to development, and fair/reasonable.
- Recent changes lowering affordable housing thresholds and allowing vacant building credits to reduce obligations.
- Appeals processes for developers to renegotiate obligations based on viability, and examples of outcomes.
- Guidance on transparency around viability assessments and confidentiality in legal cases.
- Monitoring fees for obligations and a case finding they
Community Infrastructure Levy- Helen Martin, RTPI West Midlands CPDDesign South East
The document provides background information on Dudley's process of moving from planning obligations to a Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) to help fund infrastructure needed to support planned growth. It discusses: 1) growth predictions and existing planning obligations approach; 2) reasons for moving to CIL due to viability issues and legal tests; 3) work done to identify infrastructure needs, funding gaps, and viability of potential CIL rates; and 4) next steps and timetable to adopt a CIL charging schedule. The CIL aims to strike a balance between funding infrastructure and development viability across the area.
Gilian Macinnes, PAS: S106 – Where we are - current context (PPT 20 pages)PAS_Team
This document summarizes the current context around section 106 (s106) obligations in the UK. It outlines that s106 obligations can restrict development, require certain activities, require land to be used in a specified way, or require payments. S106 agreements must meet legal tests outlined in CIL regulations and policy tests in the NPPF. The document also discusses reforms and changes to s106, including the ability to renegotiate agreements, appeals processes, new guidance from the DCLG and statements from the Minister of State regarding affordable housing and tariff thresholds and vacant buildings.
What you need to know: Implementation is technically more complicated than developing a charging schedule; the 2014 regulations have introduced some useful amendments;
a number of policies are discretionary and require a decision to ‘turn on’ and there is little in the regulations regarding how to spend CIL.
This document discusses earthquake strengthening from the perspective of the Property Council of New Zealand. It summarizes the Property Council's position on government actions around earthquake strengthening requirements between 2012-2015. It also discusses the challenges commercial property owners face regarding deciding whether to strengthen buildings and pay the substantial costs involved, and the debate around strengthening heritage buildings.
This document discusses issues related to Section 106 agreements and approaches to addressing them. It covers policy context, community infrastructure levy (CIL), financial viability assessments, common clause types in S106 agreements, and post-CIL options. Case studies from local authorities demonstrate how they have implemented CIL and handled viability and affordable housing requirements. Managing obligations over the long term through enforcement protocols and maintenance arrangements is also addressed.
Similar to Lewes District Council - Developer Contributions - Town & Parish Conference 2012 (20)
Lewes District Council - Developer Contributions - Town & Parish Conference 2012
1. ● Developer Contributions – Community
Infrastructure Levy (CIL) & S106 obligations
● New Homes Bonus
October 2012
Town & Parish Council Conference, Peacehaven
2. 1 Developer and other contributions
• S106 obligations
• Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL)
• Highway contributions (s38 and s278
Highways Act)
3. 2 S106 Obligations
• S106 is not replaced by CIL
• Old reality – pre 2008
• New reality-post 2008:
Times have changed – viability
Times have changed - legislation
4. 3 The tests for S106 contributions:
• If the development is capable of being charged
CIL, the S106 obligation must meet these tests:
• NECESSARY to make the development acceptable in
planning terms
• DIRECTLY RELATED to the development
• FAIRLY AND REASONABLY related in
kind and scale to the development
(2010 CIL Regulations)
5. 4 S106 obligations
• Site specific mitigation measures
(e.g. highway and drainage works)
• For pooled contributions up to April 2014/CIL
adoption
• Then for up to five obligations where
infrastructure not funded by CIL
• Key date: April 2014 – scope of S106
restricted after that time
6. 5 What is a CIL?
• A mechanism for developer contributions
• Set by development type and zone
• A charge per square metre of floorspace
• Not site specific: contribution goes into a pot:
not specifically for particular sites
• Set by Local Planning
Authority via a CIL
Charging Schedule
7. 6 What is CIL for?
• To help pay for infrastructure needed to
support new development
• But not to remedy existing deficiencies unless
the new scheme will make it worse
• Councils must spend the income on
infrastructure – but can decide what (and that
can change over time)
8. 7 Charging CIL – some basics
• £ per square metre on net additional (internal)
floorspace
• Rates can vary by area or use ( or both)
• Due when the development starts
• It is index linked
• The landowner is responsible for paying it
9. 8 When can it apply?
• To all development that involves „buildings that
people normally go into‟
• Development over 100sqm gross internal floorspace
• A single dwelling ( even under 100sqm) (but not
subdivisions of dwellings)
• Includes permitted development (it doesn‟t have to
follow a planning permission)
• Once set, you can‟t pick and choose which
developments to charge
10. 9 Why set a CIL?
• Money for infrastructure through charging a
wider range of new development -a little from
almost everyone (so fairer)
• There is a lack of government or other money
to provide infrastructure
• It is set out in a schedule based on evidence
(so more transparent)
• Developers have certainty
• Changes to s106 – legal tests and pooling
11. 10 Setting your CIL
• Identify the infrastructure funding gap: what
infrastructure do you need to support planned
development?
• Then see what CIL rate it is viable to charge
• Check out the consequences of the rate you
are seeking on key uses
• Make sure that your rate is backed by robust
evidence
• Consult, independent examination
12. 11 What you need to set a CIL?
• Up to date development plan – not necessarily
a core strategy
• Evidence on infrastructure funding gap
• Evidence on viability
• All evidence is „appropriate available
evidence‟
13. 12 Strike the Appropriate balance
Between
– the desirability of funding the infrastructure gap to
support the development of the area from CIL
and
– the potential effects (taken as a whole) of the
imposition of CIL upon the economic
viability of development across the
area.
14. 13 Viability - rate setting:
• Strategic approach
• Look at the effect on the whole area
• The rate may put some development at risk
• No requirement to use any particular models
• Can set differential rates – but rates can only
be differentiated on viability grounds.
15. 14 Differential rates
• Different between uses (not just use classes)
• Different across the area
• Both or neither
• All differential rates must be based on viability
evidence (not policy objectives)
17. 16 Exemptions etc
• Social housing relief
• Buildings used for charitable purposes-
exempt
• Discretionary relief for charitable investments
• Instalments policy
• Exceptional circumstances (where scheme
can‟t afford to pay it), but conditions apply
18. 17 Spending CIL
• Must be spent on infrastructure needed to
support the planned development of the area
• It can be spent on infrastructure outside your
area, and be spent by another body
• “Meaningful proportion” passed onto towns
and parishes (DCLG)
• It is advisable to publish a list of the
infrastructure you intend to use CIL for (Reg
123 list)
19. 18 How is the levy paid?
• Usually cash contribution
• Exceptionally, land contribution can be
considered to offset CIL liability
• Falls due on commencement of the
development: but can agree to payment by
installments
20. 19 Governance
• Review your infrastructure priorities annually
• Set up council procedures and delegation
agreements for CIL
• Create the necessary CIL management
structure.
• Involvement of other organisations?
(counties, towns & parishes)
• Enter into memoranda of co-operation with
other bodies (e.g. neighbouring authorities)
21. 20 What are we doing at LDC?
• Joint technical work with other East Sussex
authorities, Brighton & Hove, SDNPA
• Preparing high level CIL Economic Viability Study
• Each authority will need to do further detailed work
• Will inform CIL charging schedules by each authority
over next 12 - 18 months.
• Need to get LDC/SDNPA Core Strategy in place first.
22. 21 New Homes Bonus (NHB)
• Financial incentive to local authorities to promote
new housing development
• NHB based on council tax for each additional home
built, or brought back into use
• DCLG payment formula assessed annually
• NHB began for 2011/12 financial year: will build up
gradually over six years
• Spending NHB: wholly at discretion of local planning
authority
• Details on www.communities.gov.uk
23. • LDC received £211,341 in 2011/12
£519,450 in 2012/13
£730,791 TOTAL
• NHB money held by LDC in ring-fenced reserve
• Spending so far:
– Neighbourhood Planning £70,000
– Newhaven University Technical College Bid
£29,000
– Democratic Conversations Action Plan £10,000
• But, new NHB income offset by more significant
DCLG cuts in financial support for local authorities.
Even deeper cuts expected next year and beyond.