SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1
Luby’s: Where do they go from here?1
In 2015, Luby’s Inc. had completed a decade of dramatic
change. The changes really
began in 2000, when Luby’s stock price had fallen from $33.00
per share in 1986 to $4.00 per
share. At that time, Texas restaurateurs Christopher and Harris
Pappas announced that they had
purchased six percent of Luby’s stock and were considering
additional investments. The
brothers had a long history of success in the casual dining
segment of the restaurant industry.
They owned Pappas Restaurants, Inc., a privately held firm with
60 restaurants operating in the
casual dining segment under the names Pappas Seafood House,
Pappasito’s Cantina,
Pappadeaux, Pappas Bar-B-Que, and Pappas Brothers Steak
House. The Pappas brothers joined
Luby’s as CEO/President and COO in March of 2001 and by
mid-2001, both the officers and
directors of the firm had changed substantially. Cost cutting
and other operational changes to the
firm helped raised the stock price, but profits remained low.
While Harris focused on the Pappas Restaurants, Inc. business,
Christopher took over as
President and CEO of Luby’s. The brothers recognized that
Luby’s faced a number of
challenges. As CEO Chris Pappas stated when they invested in
the firm, “The road to improved
financial performance will not be easy, but Harris Pappas and I
are investing significant effort
and resources in Luby’s in a concerted effort to reach this
objective” (Ruggless, 2001, p. 11).
The firm continued to focus exclusively on its cafeterias until
2007, when they brought
the firm’s made-from-scratch food to institutional cafeterias
(hospitals, schools, etc.) expanding
into the culinary services business, but profitability remained
elusive. The stock dropped below
$4.00 again in 2009 when the firm reported a net loss of $26.4
million—more than 10% of total
sales. More drastic change appeared to be necessary.
1
This case was created by the author as a teaching tool. It is not
meant to demonstrate either effective or ineffective
management.
The material used in this case was collected from publicly
available documents filed by the company and other sources.
Any
errors in the material are the fault of the author and not of the
company.
2
The next year brought a more change, when the firm acquired
gourmet hamburger chain
Fuddruckers, Inc. for $63.1 million in cash following the
bankruptcy of Fuddruckers’ parent
company. The acquisition added 56 Fuddruckers locations,
three KooKooRoo Chicken Bistro
locations, and Luby’s become the franchisor for an additional
130 Fuddruckers franchise
locations. The firm followed this diversification in 2012, with
the acquisition of all 23
Cheeseburger in Paradise locations for $10.3 million in cash.
Whether those changes will
resolve the profitability issue, though, remained to be seen.
Table 1 summarizes some of the
changes to Luby’s over the last dozen years.
Table 1: Changes in Luby’s (2002-2014)
Category 2014 2002
Number of Cafeterias 96 193
Fuddruckers (Company-operated) 71 0
Fuddruckers (Franchises) 110 0
Culinary Contract Service Locations 21 0
Cheeseburger in Paradise 8 0
KooKooRoo Chicken Bistro 2 (closed after fiscal year-end) 0
Number of States 36 10
Owned Locations 92 124
Leased Locations 82 69
Number of Employees 8490 11,000
Store Managers ( including Sr., Assoc.,
and Asst. Managers) 739 600
Executive/Administrative Staff 142 200
The Industry
Luby’s competed primarily in the Family Dining and Casual
Dining sectors of the
Restaurant industry (SIC 5812, NAICS 722212). Luby’s closest
competitors in the cafeteria
business were Furr’s cafeterias and Piccadilly cafeterias, but
they also viewed other “family
dining” restaurants to be close competitors. The addition of
Fuddruckers and Cheeseburger in
Paradise expanded the scope of the firm’s competitors to
include firms like Ruby Tuesday and
Red Robin Gourmet Burgers.
3
The restaurant industry had four major segments: Quick
Service (McDonald’s, Long
John Silver), Casual Dining (Applebees, Outback Steakhouse),
Family Dining (Luby’s, Ryan’s,
Cracker Barrel), and Specialty Dining (Starbucks, Krispy
Kreme), with cafeterias included in the
family dining segment. No single firm had a significant share
of industry sales. The Family
Dining segment was further subdivided between Full service
and Limited service formats. Full
service restaurants offered table service and price meals by the
dish, often preparing the meals to
order. Buffet concept restaurants (Limited service) were self-
service and usually all-you-can-eat
with a single price for all. Cafeterias combined self-service
with pricing by the dish. Both
cafeterias and buffets generally used batch preparation rather
than single meal preparation.
Cafeteria chains had taken a beating, largely from increased
competition with casual
dining and buffet concept restaurants, but were also being
squeezed by rising utility and food
costs. Most chains have brought in CEOs from the casual
dining sector, as well as attempting
new concepts and horizontal integration, but with limited
success. Furr’s Restaurant Group, of
Richardson, TX, filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy in January of
2003 and again in 2014, when its
assets were sold to creditors. Furr’s still operates cafeterias
under the Furr’s and Bishop’s
names. Piccadilly, headquartered in Baton Rouge, LA,
purchased Morrison’s Restaurants (a
rival cafeteria chain) in 1998 for $46 million, bringing it to over
200 units. Piccadilly also filed
for bankruptcy in 2012 and was sold to creditors in 2014 though
it still operates 60 locations.
The main customers for cafeterias tend to be at or near
retirement age, brand loyal, and price-
sensitive. As stock analyst Preston Silvey noted, “It’s a
generational concept, viewed in the
younger people’s eyes as a place their parents or grandparents
went. For them to survive, they
have to develop some concepts to bring in the younger crowd”
(Ruggless, 2001).
4
The outlook for restaurants as a whole is more positive than for
cafeterias. Per capita
spending on meals away from home has increased with each
generation. In 1955, 25 percent of
meals were eaten away from home. By 1996, that percentage
had risen to 44 percent. U.S.
restaurant revenues, which in 1970 totaled $42.8 billion in
current U.S. dollars, had risen to
$683.4 billion by 2014. These trends among U. S. consumers
are attributed to faster-paced
lifestyles, an increase in the percentage of women working
outside the home, and a rise in the
number of single-parent households. Table 2 presents sales and
growth forecasts for the industry
by format.
Table 2: Projected Food and Drink Sales, 2014, by Type of
Outlet
Type of Outlet Sales (percent of Total) Growth Rate
Full Service Restaurants 49.2 2.6%
Limited Service Restaurants 39.0 4.4%
Buffets and Cafeterias 0.7 2.5%
Social Caterers 1.3 4.6%
Snack and nonalcoholic beverage
bars
5 5.0%
Bars and Taverns 4 3.4%
Total Eating and Drinking Places 100 3.6%
Source: National Restaurant Association Forecast
(www.restaurant.org)
The National Restaurant Association’s Restaurant Trends Study,
2013, found locally
sourced food, gluten-free items, and healthful kids’ meals to be
the top menu trends for both full
and limited service restaurants. The top challenges noted by
restaurant managers in the survey
were healthcare reform, government regulation, the economy,
and recruiting and retaining
employees. The restaurant business is notorious for high
employee turnover and is extremely
labor intensive, with sales per full time employee running at
less than $73,000 per year—notably
lower than for most industries.
The industry is also highly fragmented. With more than
990,000 competitors in the U.S.,
more than 90 percent employ less than 50 employees and seven
out of every 10 firms in the
restaurant industry are single-unit independents with less than
20 employees. Sales per unit in
http://www.restaurant.org/
5
full service restaurants average $874,000 per year—slightly
higher than the $777,000 average for
a limited table service restaurant. Table 3 presents industry
averages for the Restaurant industry.
Table 3: Industry Financial Information
Full Service Restaurants
(NAICS 722210) N = 2,587
Limited Table Service Restaurants
(NAICS 722211) N = 187
Inc. Stmt. Data % of Sales $/Seat % of Sales $/Seat
Total Sales 100% $5295 100% $8,456
Cost of Food 33.3 $1,776 32.5 $2,397
Payroll & Benefits 33.9 $1,758 27.5 $1,964
Direct Operating Exp. 5.7 $307 4.8 $317
Marketing 1.9% $90 3.3 $248
Utilities 3.2 $175 2.9 $236
Gen. & Admin. Exp. 3.0 $156 2.6 $171
Occupancy Expense (Rent,
Ins. & Taxes)
7.0 $366 7.5 $532
Balance Sheet Data % of Assets % of Assets
Cash 12.4 13.2
Accounts Recvble .9 2.6
Inventory 3.3 6.0
Other Current Assets 2.6 3.3
Fixed Assets 57.0 54.8
Intangibles 14.2 9.8
Other L. T. Assets 9.6 10.3
Current Liabilities 36.1 40.0
L.T. Debt 45.6 37.9
Other L. T. Liabilities 8.5 10.4
Net Worth 9.9 11.7
Selected Fin. Ratios
Current .6 1.4
Quick .4 .4
Fixed Assets/Worth 16.2 3.9
Debt/Worth 26.7 5.6
NS/Fixed Assets 5.5 6.5
NS/Total Assets 3.0 3.2
Sources: National Restaurant Association Industry Operations
Report
Risk Management Associates Key Financial Ratios
The Company
Luby’s can trace its roots to a San Antonio, TX cafeteria which
originally opened in
1947. The company went public in 1973, with shares listed on
the New York Stock Exchange
6
(symbol LUB). In 1987 the firm had opened its 100
th
location and hit the 200 mark 10 years
later. By 2014, the firm was operating four separate business
units as detailed below.
Restaurant Operations
From its headquarters in Houston, TX, Luby’s operated
restaurants under several brand
names as discussed below. In November of 2014, Luby’s
operated 174 restaurants at 169
property locations, of which 92 were located on property owned
by the firm and 82 on leased
premises. Five of the operating locations were Combo locations
but considered two restaurants
(Luby’s and Fuddruckers side-by-side). Two operating locations
were primarily Luby’s
Cafeterias, but also served Fuddruckers hamburgers. One
operating location was a Bob Luby’s
Seafood Grill. Luby’s Cafeterias have seating capacity for 250
to 300 customers at each location
while Fuddruckers locations generally seat 125 to 200
customers and Cheeseburger in Paradise
locations generally seat between 180 and 220. See Table 4
below for a list of locations in
November of 2014.
Table 4: Company owned and operated locations
State Locations
Texas
Houston Metro 54
San Antonio Metro 18
Rio Grande Valley 13
Dallas/Fort Worth Metro 14
Austin 11
Other Texas Markets 17
California 9
Illinois 6
Arizona 5
Maryland 5
Virginia 3
Georgia 3
Oklahoma 3
Other States 13
Total 174
7
Luby’s Cafeteria
Following the acquisitions, the Luby’s brand still accounted for
63% of the firm’s total
revenues. In its 96 cafeteria locations (92 in Texas, 2 in
Oklahoma, 1 in Arkansas and 1 in
Louisiana), the firm emphasized made-from-scratch food from a
serving line including 15 to 22
entrées, 12 to 14 vegetable dishes, 8 to 10 salads, and 10 to 12
varieties of desserts daily. Each
dish was available a-la-carte or as part of several combination
meals like the popular LuAnn
Platter.
Scratch preparation was integral to the Luby’s vision—the firm
even made its own
mayonnaise. Luby’s recipes have been featured in a number of
publications and the firm
received several awards for its 60
th
anniversary recipe book in 2008. Most cafeterias were open
for lunch and dinner seven days a week and for breakfast on the
weekend. All locations sold
food-to-go orders, which accounted for 13.0% of restaurant
sales in fiscal year 2013 and 2014.
Luby’s staff regularly reviewed menus and introduced new and
seasonal food
preferences. Each restaurant was operated as a separate unit
under a general manager who has
responsibility for day-to-day operations, including food
production and personnel selection and
supervision. In addition to the general manager, each location
had one associate manager and
one to two assistant managers who oversaw the restaurant’s
full-time and part-time associates
working in overlapping shifts.
An area leader supervised each general manager. Each area
leader was responsible for
approximately 7 to 10 units, depending on location. Quality
control teams visited each location
to work with staff on maintaining consistency in the firm’s
recipes, train personnel in new
techniques, and implement new procedures within the company.
8
In fiscal year 2013, the company opened a new Luby’s cafeteria
and a new Fuddruckers
on the same property with a common wall but separate kitchens
and dining areas. In 2014, four
more of these combination locations were added. These Combo
locations shared a general
manager.
Fuddruckers
Most of the remaining sales came from the Fuddruckers brand.
Luby’s owned and
operated 71 Fuddruckers restaurants three of which were
converted from Cheeseburger in
Paradise locations in 2014. Boasting that they serve the
“World’s Greatest Hamburgers,”
Fuddruckers locations featured an open kitchen where guests
could see burgers freshly prepared
from scratch all day.
Fuddruckers served “fresh, never frozen, 100% USDA All-
American premium-cut beef”
with no fillers or artificial ingredients added. Fuddruckers
sesame-topped buns were baked from
scratch all day in each restaurant’s bakery. As in the cafeterias,
guests at Fuddruckers ordered
and paid as they enter the restaurant. They then take the
cooked-to-order burger to Fuddruckers’
Build Your Own® produce bar where they added their choice of
fresh veggies and signature
Fuddruckers condiments.
While Fuddruckers’ signature burger accounts for
approximately 47.0% of Fuddruckers
restaurant sales, the menu also included exotic burgers such as
buffalo, steak sandwiches,
chicken breast sandwiches, hot dogs, a variety of salads, fish
sandwiches, wedge-cut French
fries, onion rings, soft drinks, handmade milkshakes, and
bakery items. Beer and wine were
served but account for less than 2% of restaurant sales.
Fuddruckers’ decor had a casual,
Americana theme.
9
Each Fuddruckers was staffed by a general manager, two or
three assistant managers, and
25 to 45 other associates, including full-time and part-time
associates working in overlapping
shifts. With Fuddruckers’ self-service concept, the restaurants
do not employ waitstaff.
Fuddruckers restaurant operations were divided into three
geographic regions, each
supervised by an area vice president. The three regions were
further divided into a total of eight
areas, each supervised by an area leader who oversaw 7 to 8
restaurants.
Franchising
In addition to the company-owned locations, Luby’s had 51
franchisees operating another
110 Fuddruckers restaurants in locations across the U.S. and in
several other countries, four of
which were added in 2014. Eighteen franchise owners each
owned from two to twelve
restaurants. The thirty-three remaining franchise owners owned
one restaurant each. The
Fuddruckers acquisition came with 130 franchise locations,
some of which were later closed or
purchased as company-owned restaurants, but Luby’s continues
to seek new franchising
opportunities. Table Five details those locations.
A standard franchise agreement generally has an initial term of
20 years. Franchise
agreements typically grant franchisees an exclusive territorial
license to operate a single
restaurant within a specified area, usually a four-mile radius
surrounding the franchised
restaurant. Franchisees pay an initial franchise fee and annual
royalty payments (based on
franchise location profits). In return, Fuddruckers provided
franchise assistance for: site
selection, prototypical architectural plans, interior and exterior
design and layout, training,
marketing and sales techniques, assistance by a Fuddruckers
“opening team” at the time a
franchised restaurant opens, and operations and accounting
guidelines set forth in various
10
policies and procedures manuals. Franchisees were responsible
for all direct costs for the
development, construction and operation of their restaurants.
Table 5: Fuddruckers Franchise Locations
State/Country Franchises
Texas
Houston Metro 1
Dallas/Fort Worth Metro 10
Other Texas Markets 13
California 8
Florida 7
Georgia 3
Idaho 1
Louisiana 3
Maryland 2
Massachusetts 5
Michigan 5
Missouri 3
Montana 5
Nebraska 1
Nevada 2
New Jersey 2
New Mexico 3
North Carolina 2
Oregon 1
Pennsylvania 4
South Carolina 7
South Dakota 2
Tennessee 3
Virginia 3
Wisconsin 2
Other States 2
Canada 1
Chile 1
Dominican Republic 1
Italy 2
Mexico 1
Panama 1
Puerto Rico 5
Total 110
11
All franchisees were required to operate their restaurants in
accordance with Fuddruckers
standards and specifications, including controls over menu
items, food quality and preparation.
At least three managers per restaurant must successfully
complete the firm’s training program.
Franchised restaurants were evaluated regularly for compliance
with franchise agreements and
company standards during periodic, unannounced, on-site
inspections and standards evaluation
reports.
Cheeseburger in Paradise
Developed in collaboration with singer Jimmy Buffet and based
on one of his most
popular songs, Cheeseburger in Paradise was a casual, full-
service restaurant and bar with a
tropical theme. The acquisition was a disappointment. Only
eight of the purchased 23
Cheeseburger in Paradise locations still operated under that
name at the end of 2014. Other
locations were closed or converted to the Fuddruckers format.
The remaining locations were
located in high traffic areas near successful malls and tourist
attractions.
Culinary Contract Services
In November 2014, Luby’s operated culinary contract services
at 25 locations; 18 in the
Houston, Texas area, three in Louisiana, two in Austin, Texas,
and one each in Florida and
Oklahoma. Luby’s Culinary Contract Services provided food
service management to healthcare,
educational, and corporate dining facilities.
The healthcare accounts were full service and typically included
in-room delivery,
catering, vending, coffee service, and retail dining. In fiscal
year 2014, the firm had servicing
contracts for 13 long-term acute care hospitals, one acute care
medical center, one ambulatory
surgical center, one behavioral hospital, two business and
industry clients, three higher education
institutions, one Children’s Hospital, two Medical office
buildings, and one freestanding coffee
12
shop located inside an office building. Luby’s managers
believed they had a unique ability to
deliver culinary services including facility design and
procurement as well as nutrition and
branded food services to business clients.
Properties
Luby’s owned the underlying land and buildings on which 71 of
the Luby’s Cafeterias
and 22 Fuddruckers restaurants were located. Five of these
restaurant properties contained excess
building space or an extra building on the property which had
ten tenants unaffiliated with
Luby’s, Inc. In addition to the owned locations, 25 Luby’s
Cafeteria restaurants, 48 Fuddruckers
restaurants, and 8 Cheeseburger in Paradise restaurants were
operated on leased property. Most
of the leases were fixed-dollar rentals, but required the firm to
pay additional amounts related to
property taxes, hazard insurance, and maintenance of common
areas.
Table 6: Property and Equipment, Intangible Assets and
Goodwill (net of impairment and
accumulated depreciation )
August 27,
2014
August 28,
2013
Estimated
Useful Lives
(years)
(In thousands)
Land
$ 69,767
$ 62,191
—
Restaurant equipment and
furnishings
131,932 116,664 3 to 15
Buildings 181,535 172,342 20 to 33
Leasehold and leasehold
improvements
40,835 39,108
Office furniture and equipment 7,537 7,444 3 to 10
Construction in progress 10,313 7,814 —
441,919 405,563
Less accumulated depreciation
and amortization
(228,427) (215,066)
Property and equipment, net $ 213,492 $ 190,497
Intangible assets, net $ 24,014 $ 25,517 21
Goodwill $ 1,681 $ 2,169
The firm also retained three owned properties and seven leased
properties to develop for
future use as well as one owned non-operating property held for
resale and valued at $1.0
13
million. The firm owned four other properties. One location
was used as a bakeshop supporting
the baked products for operating restaurants. One location was
leased to third party tenants
utilizing the entire building and two were leased to Fuddruckers
franchisees.
Marketing
Luby’s historically relied on word-of-mouth marketing. Prior to
1991, the firm averaged
less than 0.5% of sales for its marketing budget. During the
1990s, the firm toyed with a more
aggressive advertising strategy--gradually increasing its
marketing budget to a high in 1999 of
about 2.5% of sales. More recently, the firm has spent
approximately 1.1% of restaurant sales on
marketing, across radio and television advertising, billboards,
direct mailings, movie theater
advertising, and social media. Total advertising expense
(included in other operating expenses)
was $4.6 million, $3.9 million, and $2.4 million in fiscal 2014,
2013, and 2012, respectively.
The firm’s market research indicated several major customer
groups frequent Luby’s
cafeterias: families with small children, seniors, shoppers,
travelers, and business people. These
groups appreciated the opportunity to select a more balanced
meal than those offered by most
quick service and casual dining establishments. The firm would
like to emphasize more targeted
marketing to families but seniors were still a significantly
higher percentage of the customer base
for Luby’s than for non-cafeteria competitors. Younger
generations still tended to view Luby’s
as the place their grandparents (or great grandparents) eat. By
contrast, the Cheeseburger in
Paradise customer was younger, while the customers for
Fuddruckers included a wider range of
ages.
Purchasing and Distribution
Purchasing had the most radical change in recent years. Prior to
1998, local cafeteria
managers conducted almost all their own buying. In 1999, the
firm centralized purchasing to
14
obtain quantity discounts. For each of its three major
purchasing regions, the firm contracted
with a competitively selected prime supplier. Centralizing
purchasing and distribution was
intended to allow Luby’s to reduce costs through volume buying
and by minimizing suppliers’
distribution costs. In keeping with its commitment to fresh,
made-from-scratch food, the firm
purchased locally sourced ingredients whenever practical.
Human Resources
Luby’s enjoyed generally good labor relations. None of the
firm’s employees were
unionized and many employees had been with Luby’s for
years—a rarity in an industry
characterized by high employee turnover. Hourly employees
earned between $7.81 and $13.00
an hour depending on length of service. In dramatic contrast to
other firms in the restaurant
industry, substantially all of the employees received group life,
health and disability insurance, a
two-week paid vacation (three weeks following five years of
service), free meals, and optional
dental, vision, and prescription drug coverage. All were
covered by insurance and retirement
plans. The voluntary 401(k) plan voluntary was available for
any employee over the age of 21
with at least one year of continuous employment with the
company. The firm matched 25
percent of each employee’s contributions to a maximum of four
percent of salary, which cost the
firm just over $500,000 in 2014.
Luby’s had long emphasized in-house training. New managers
attended a several-month-
long program before moving to a restaurant as an Assistant
Manager where training continued in
all aspects of the food service business. Once promoted to
Associate Manager, they were
eligible for profit sharing based on store sales and profitability.
For Senior Managers, profit
sharing can more than double their salaries. The majority of the
firm’s senior managers had been
15
with the firm for 10 or more years. Low turnover was of
particular interest since management
tenure in the restaurant industry was strongly tied to store
performance.
Technology and Support Services
The firm leased a service facility in Houston, TX from the
Pappas brothers. The facility
had 21,000 square feet of warehouse space plus 5,644 square
feet of office space. From this
facility, the firm dispatched repair and service teams to
restaurants having equipment problems.
The facility also fabricated proprietary equipment for its
restaurants. These systems had higher
performance and longer life than comparable products generally
available on the market.
The firm also maintained an active social media presence and
several websites which
provided restaurant locations, daily menus, and other
information about the firm. The websites
offered customers the option of ordering Luby’s-to-go meals by
phone, fax, or online. A similar
Fuddruckers application was in development. The information
system at Luby’s also allowed
the firm to move much of its training online.
Conclusion
Despite the changes Luby’s had made, the stock had
underperformed all comparison
groups including the S&P SmallCap 600 Index and an industry
peer group consisting of Bob
Evans Farms, Inc., CBRL Group, Inc., Denny’s Corporation,
Frisch Restaurant Group, Red
Robin Gourmet Burgers and Ruby Tuesday Inc. These
companies were multi-unit family and
casual dining restaurant operators in the mid-price range (Table
7).
Table 7: Comparison of stock price
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
Luby’s, Inc. 100.00 61.33 69.07 64.15 88.96 102.21
S&P 500 Index—Total Return 100.00 78.89 82.76 98.08 116.03
137.51
S&P 500 Restaurant Index 100.00 98.65 128.73 173.19 188.78
225.69
Peer Group Index Only 100.00 102.59 114.98 132.66 167.20
238.64
Peer Group Index + Luby’s Inc. 100.00 99.80 111.76 127.71
161.55 228.71
16
Other measures of performance had been similarly
disappointing. Same store sales
company-wide were flat in 2014, but differed across brands.
While same store sales declined
3.5% at the Fuddruckers restaurants, they were offset by
increases at Luby’s locations and at the
single Combo location which had been open more than two
years. Total revenues were up,
mostly from the Luby’s, CCS, and Combo locations. Despite
the sales increase, the firm again
reported a net loss of $1.6 million for 2014. While some
segments of the company reported
profits, they were more than offset by a $2.4 million loss from
the Cheeseburger in Paradise
brand and expenses related to a dozen store openings.
While the firm has been discounted by many analysts, CEO
Christopher Pappas began
aggressively buying the company’s stock in early 2015. In
January, he purchased 43,254 shares
for $203,884.79 and followed those purchases with an
additional $386,836.00 investment,
acquiring another 78,381 shares during the first week of
February. Those purchases raised his
total ownership to 3,586,124 shares valued at approximately
$18,181,648.68. Whether that
investment was a wise one depends on the firm’s strategy in the
coming years.
17
References
Brewer, Jim (Feb 9th, 2015). Luby's CEO Purchases
$115,737.96 in Stock (LUB). WKRB
News.
Fuddruckers website, (www.Fuddruckers.com).
Koo Koo Roo website, (www.kookooroo.com).
Luby’s, Inc. SEC filing forms 10-K (1998-2014)
Luby’s company website, (www.Lubys.com).
Luby’s Culinary Services website, (www.Lubyscs.com).
National Restaurant Association, Restaurant Spending, July,
2002, available at
www.restaurant.org
National Restaurant Association, Restaurant Industry Forecast,
2014, available at
www.restaurant.org
National Restaurant Association, Industry at a glance, 2014,
available at www.restaurant.org
National Restaurant Association, Restaurant Trend Study, 2013,
available at www.restaurant.org
Risk Management Associates (2014). Annual Statement Studies
and Key Financial Ratios.
Ruggless, Ron (2001). Luby’s woes likely to continue, but
management is optimistic. Nation’s
Restaurant News July 9, 2001.
Ruggless, Ron (2001). Struggling cafeteria chains draft casual
dining vets in recovery bids.
Nation’s Restaurant News January 20, 2001.
Ruggless, Ron (2003). Cafeterias face plate full of pressures.
Nation’s Restaurant News
January 20, 2003.
Siskos, Catherine (2002). Shareholders Unite!, Kiplinger’s
Personal Finance, available at
www.kiplinger.com
U. S. Census Bureau, 1997 Economic Census: Accommodation
and Food Services,
(www.census.gov).
http://www.fuddruckers.com/
http://www.kookooroo.com/
http://www.lubys.com/
http://www.lubyscs.com/
http://www.restaurant.org/
http://www.restaurant.org/
http://www.restaurant.org/
http://www.restaurant.org/
http://www.kiplinger.com/
http://www.census.gov/
18
LUBY’S, INC. Consolidated Statements of
Operations (USD $)
In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless
otherwise specified
12 Months Ended
Aug. 27, 2014 Aug. 28, 2013 Aug. 29, 2012
SALES:
Restaurant sales $ 368,267 $ 360,001 $ 324,536
Culinary contract services 18,555 16,693 17,711
Franchise revenue 7,027 6,937 7,232
Vending revenue 532 565 618
TOTAL SALES 394,381 384,196 350,097
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
Cost of food 106,284 103,070 90,416
Payroll and related costs 127,792 123,864 112,279
Other operating expenses 68,820 64,918 54,007
Occupancy costs 21,060 21,012 18,097
Opening costs 2,164 783 395
Cost of culinary contract services 16,177 14,874 16,545
Depreciation and amortization 20,062 18,376 17,894
General and administrative expenses 35,038 32,217 30,808
Provision for asset impairments, net 2,498 615 451
Net loss (gain) on disposition of property and equipment
(2,357) (1,723) 278
Total costs and expenses 397,538 378,006 341,170
INCOME FROM OPERATIONS (3,157) 6,190 8,927
Interest expense (1,247) (920) (942)
Other income, net 1,131 1,052 1,067
Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued
operations
(3,273) 6,322 9,052
Provision (benefit) for income taxes, net (1,660) 1,775 1,654
Income (loss) from continuing operations (1,613) 4,547 7,398
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of
income taxes
(1,834) (1,386) (645)
NET INCOME (LOSS) $ (3,447) $ 3,161 $ 6,753
Income (loss) per share from continuing operations:
Basic (in Dollars per share) $ (0.06) $ 0.16 $ 0.26
Assuming dilution (in Dollars per share) $ (0.06) $ 0.16 $ 0.26
Income (loss) per share from discontinued
operations:
Basic (in Dollars per share) $ (0.06) $ (0.05) $ (0.02)
Assuming dilution (in Dollars per share) $ (0.06) $ (0.05) $
(0.02)
Net income (loss) per share:
Basic (in Dollars per share) $ (0.12) $ 0.11 $ 0.24
Assuming dilution (in Dollars per share) $ (0.12) $ 0.11 $ 0.24
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
Basic (in Shares) 28,812 28,618 28,351
Assuming dilution (in Shares) 28,812 28,866 28,429
19
Luby’s, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified
Aug. 27, 2014 Aug. 28, 2013
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 2,788 $ 1,528
Trade accounts and other receivables, net 4,112 4,083
Food and supply inventories 5,556 4,908
Prepaid expenses 2,815 3,267
Assets related to discontinued operations 52 196
Deferred income taxes 587 1,635
Total current assets 15,910 15,617
Property held for sale 991 449
Assets related to discontinued operations 4,204 4,218
Property and equipment, net 213,492 190,497
Intangible assets, net 24,014 25,517
Goodwill 1,681 2,169
Deferred income taxes 11,294 7,923
Other assets 3,849 4,255
Total assets 275,435 250,645
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable 26,269 23,655
Liabilities related to discontinued operations 590 527
Accrued expenses and other liabilities 23,107 21,817
Total current liabilities 49,966 45,999
Credit facility debt 42,000 19,200
Liabilities related to discontinued operations 278 448
Other liabilities 8,167 7,865
Total liabilities 100,411 73,512
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common stock, $0.32 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized;
Shares
issued were 28,949,523 and 28,804,344, respectively; Shares
outstanding were 28,449,523 and 28,304,344, respectively
9,264 9,217
Paid-in capital 27,356 26,065
Retained earnings 143,179 146,626
Less cost of treasury stock, 500,000 shares (4,775) (4,775)
Total shareholders’ equity 175,024 177,133
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $ 275,435 $ 250,645
20
FIVE-YEAR SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS
Fiscal Year Ended
August 28,
2013
August 29,
2012
August 31,
2011
August 25,
2010
August 26,
2009
(364 days)
(364 days)
(371 days)
(364 days)
(364 days)
(In thousands except per share data)
Sales
Restaurant sales $ 366,155 $ 324,536 $ 325,383 $
230,342 $ 245,799
Culinary contract services 16,693 17,711 15,619
13,728 12,970
Franchise revenue 6,937 7,232 7,092 645 –
Vending revenue 565 618 654 44 –
Total sales 390,350 350,097 348,748 244,759
258,769
Income (loss) from continuing
operations 4,222 7,613 2,800 (494 ) (14,032 )
Income (loss) from discontinued
operations
(a)
(937 ) (759 ) 165 (2,399 ) (12,386 )
Net income (loss) $ 3,285 $ 6,854 $ 2,965 $ (2,893 )
$ (26,418 )
Weighted-average shares
outstanding:
Basic 28,618 28,351 28,237 28,129 28,084
Assuming dilution 28,866 28,429 28,297 28,129
28,084
Total assets $ 250,305 $ 231,017 $ 228,020 $ 242,342
$ 199,406
Total debt $ 19,200 $ 13,000 $ 21,500 $ 41,500 $ –
Number of restaurants at fiscal year
end 180 154 156 154 119
Number of franchised restaurants at
fiscal year end 116 125 122 130 –
Number of Culinary Contract
Services contracts at fiscal year
end 21 18 22 18 15
Costs and Expenses
(As a percentage of restaurant
sales)
Cost of food 28.7 % 27.9 % 28.9 % 27.6 % 27.6 %
Payroll and related costs 34.5 % 33.9 % 34.8 % 36.0
% 36.3 %
Other operating expenses 18.1 % 16.7 % 17.5 % 17.6
% 19.0 %
Occupancy costs 5.9 % 5.4 % 5.6 % 4.0 % 3.4 %
21
Segment Data Years Ended
August 27,
2014
August 28,
2013
August 29,
2012
(In thousands)
Sales:
Company-owned restaurants $ 368,799 $ 360,566
$ 325,154
Culinary contract services 18,555 16,693
17,711
Franchising 7,027 6,937 7,232
Total $ 394,381 $ 384,196 $ 350,097
Segment level profit:
Company-owned restaurants $ 44,843 $ 47,702 $
50,355
Culinary contract services 2,378 1,819 1,166
Franchising 7,027 6,937 7,232
Total $ 54,248 $ 56,458 $ 58,753
Depreciation and amortization:
Company-owned restaurants $ 17,357 $ 16,417 $
15,990
Culinary contract services 409 440 471
Franchising 767 767 767
Corporate 1,529 752 666
Total $ 20,062 $ 18,376 $ 17,894
Total assets:
Company-owned restaurants $ 220,793 $ 203,850
$ 182,162
Culinary contract services 2,724 3,547 3,774
Franchising 13,906 14,674 15,352
Corporate 38,012 28,574 29,601
Total $ 275,435 $ 250,645 $ 230,889
Capital expenditures:
Company-owned restaurants $ 43,075 $ 30,741 $
19,077
Culinary contract services 64 95 292
Franchising — — —
Corporate 3,045 503 6,476
Total $ 46,184 $ 31,339 $ 25,845
Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations:
Segment level profit $ 54,248 $ 56,458 $ 58,753
Opening costs (2,164 ) (783 ) (395 )
Depreciation and amortization (20,062 ) (18,376 )
(17,894 )
General and administrative expenses (35,038 )
(32,217 ) (30,808 )
Provision for asset impairments, net (2,498 ) (615 )
(451 )
Net gain (loss) on disposition of property and equipment
2,357 1,723 (278 )
Interest income 6 9 9
Interest expense (1,247 ) (920 ) (942 )
Other income, net 1,125 1,043 1,058
Total $ (3,273 ) $ 6,322 $ 9,052
22
Figure 1
Luby’s Locations
(Source: Luby’s Web Page http://www.lubys.com)
Where do we go from here?
Luby’s Case
John K. Masters, PhD., Cameron University
Pam Rodgers, PhD, Cameron University
Discussion Questions
1. What is happening in Luby’s Environment?
2. What Resources does Luby’s have to work with? What makes
the firm unique?
3. What Strategy would you recommend for Luby’s?
4. What ethical issues would the firm’s current alternatives
raise?
5. Which stakeholders are harmed or benefited by particular
actions?
6. What effect might Luby’s current situation and a
recommended plan for the firm have on the firm’s culture?
 1 Luby’s Where do they go from here1  In 2015, Lu.docx

More Related Content

Similar to 1 Luby’s Where do they go from here1 In 2015, Lu.docx

Catering Trends in U.S. Foodservice
Catering Trends in U.S. FoodserviceCatering Trends in U.S. Foodservice
Catering Trends in U.S. FoodserviceMarketResearch.com
 
Comparative analysis on mac d and dominos
Comparative analysis on mac d and dominosComparative analysis on mac d and dominos
Comparative analysis on mac d and dominos
Anuj Chauhan
 
Taco Bell Brand Repositioning Strategy
Taco Bell Brand Repositioning Strategy Taco Bell Brand Repositioning Strategy
Taco Bell Brand Repositioning Strategy Sona Martirosian
 
Loeb's Crunch
Loeb's CrunchLoeb's Crunch
Loeb's Crunch
Gbarrera26
 
Noodles & Company Revised _2
Noodles & Company Revised _2Noodles & Company Revised _2
Noodles & Company Revised _2London Graves
 
Whole foods
Whole foodsWhole foods
Whole foodsmiar123
 
Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v2
Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v2Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v2
Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v2
Gbarrera26
 
Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v4
Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v4Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v4
Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v4
Gbarrera26
 
Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v4
Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v4Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v4
Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v4
Gbarrera26
 
Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v3
Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v3Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v3
Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v3
Gbarrera26
 
Chapter 14 Whole Foods 365 Degrees of Commitment to Stakeholders
Chapter 14 Whole Foods 365 Degrees of Commitment to StakeholdersChapter 14 Whole Foods 365 Degrees of Commitment to Stakeholders
Chapter 14 Whole Foods 365 Degrees of Commitment to Stakeholders
EstelaJeffery653
 
The Canal Bar.Final Plan
The Canal Bar.Final PlanThe Canal Bar.Final Plan
The Canal Bar.Final Plan
aklocek86
 
Industry analysis
Industry analysisIndustry analysis
Industry analysisefray527
 
Case studyASSIGNMENTCase Burger King (Mini Case)(J. David.docx
Case studyASSIGNMENTCase Burger King (Mini Case)(J. David.docxCase studyASSIGNMENTCase Burger King (Mini Case)(J. David.docx
Case studyASSIGNMENTCase Burger King (Mini Case)(J. David.docx
wendolynhalbert
 
Table of contents
Table of contentsTable of contents
Table of contentsSagar Patel
 
Table of contents
Table of contentsTable of contents
Table of contentsSagar Patel
 

Similar to 1 Luby’s Where do they go from here1 In 2015, Lu.docx (19)

Catering Trends in U.S. Foodservice
Catering Trends in U.S. FoodserviceCatering Trends in U.S. Foodservice
Catering Trends in U.S. Foodservice
 
Comparative analysis on mac d and dominos
Comparative analysis on mac d and dominosComparative analysis on mac d and dominos
Comparative analysis on mac d and dominos
 
Report-Loblaw's WDC
Report-Loblaw's WDCReport-Loblaw's WDC
Report-Loblaw's WDC
 
Taco Bell Brand Repositioning Strategy
Taco Bell Brand Repositioning Strategy Taco Bell Brand Repositioning Strategy
Taco Bell Brand Repositioning Strategy
 
Loeb's Crunch
Loeb's CrunchLoeb's Crunch
Loeb's Crunch
 
Final Chipotle Report
Final Chipotle ReportFinal Chipotle Report
Final Chipotle Report
 
Noodles & Company Revised _2
Noodles & Company Revised _2Noodles & Company Revised _2
Noodles & Company Revised _2
 
Staple-Sinclair - AC600 - Due Diligence Report - WFM - Week 8
Staple-Sinclair - AC600 - Due Diligence Report - WFM - Week 8Staple-Sinclair - AC600 - Due Diligence Report - WFM - Week 8
Staple-Sinclair - AC600 - Due Diligence Report - WFM - Week 8
 
Whole foods
Whole foodsWhole foods
Whole foods
 
Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v2
Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v2Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v2
Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v2
 
Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v4
Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v4Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v4
Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v4
 
Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v4
Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v4Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v4
Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v4
 
Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v3
Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v3Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v3
Loeb's crunch investor deck 2015.v3
 
Chapter 14 Whole Foods 365 Degrees of Commitment to Stakeholders
Chapter 14 Whole Foods 365 Degrees of Commitment to StakeholdersChapter 14 Whole Foods 365 Degrees of Commitment to Stakeholders
Chapter 14 Whole Foods 365 Degrees of Commitment to Stakeholders
 
The Canal Bar.Final Plan
The Canal Bar.Final PlanThe Canal Bar.Final Plan
The Canal Bar.Final Plan
 
Industry analysis
Industry analysisIndustry analysis
Industry analysis
 
Case studyASSIGNMENTCase Burger King (Mini Case)(J. David.docx
Case studyASSIGNMENTCase Burger King (Mini Case)(J. David.docxCase studyASSIGNMENTCase Burger King (Mini Case)(J. David.docx
Case studyASSIGNMENTCase Burger King (Mini Case)(J. David.docx
 
Table of contents
Table of contentsTable of contents
Table of contents
 
Table of contents
Table of contentsTable of contents
Table of contents
 

More from aryan532920

According to the NASW Code of Ethics section 6.04 (NASW, 2008), .docx
According to the NASW Code of Ethics section 6.04 (NASW, 2008), .docxAccording to the NASW Code of Ethics section 6.04 (NASW, 2008), .docx
According to the NASW Code of Ethics section 6.04 (NASW, 2008), .docx
aryan532920
 
According to the text, crime has been part of the human condition si.docx
According to the text, crime has been part of the human condition si.docxAccording to the text, crime has been part of the human condition si.docx
According to the text, crime has been part of the human condition si.docx
aryan532920
 
According to Ronald Story and Bruce Laurie, The dozen years between.docx
According to Ronald Story and Bruce Laurie, The dozen years between.docxAccording to Ronald Story and Bruce Laurie, The dozen years between.docx
According to Ronald Story and Bruce Laurie, The dozen years between.docx
aryan532920
 
According to Kirk (2016), most of your time will be spent work with .docx
According to Kirk (2016), most of your time will be spent work with .docxAccording to Kirk (2016), most of your time will be spent work with .docx
According to Kirk (2016), most of your time will be spent work with .docx
aryan532920
 
According to the Council on Social Work Education, Competency 5 Eng.docx
According to the Council on Social Work Education, Competency 5 Eng.docxAccording to the Council on Social Work Education, Competency 5 Eng.docx
According to the Council on Social Work Education, Competency 5 Eng.docx
aryan532920
 
According to Kirk (2016), most of our time will be spent working.docx
According to Kirk (2016), most of our time will be spent working.docxAccording to Kirk (2016), most of our time will be spent working.docx
According to Kirk (2016), most of our time will be spent working.docx
aryan532920
 
According to Kirk (2016), most of your time will be spent working wi.docx
According to Kirk (2016), most of your time will be spent working wi.docxAccording to Kirk (2016), most of your time will be spent working wi.docx
According to Kirk (2016), most of your time will be spent working wi.docx
aryan532920
 
According to Davenport (2014) the organizational value of healthcare.docx
According to Davenport (2014) the organizational value of healthcare.docxAccording to Davenport (2014) the organizational value of healthcare.docx
According to Davenport (2014) the organizational value of healthcare.docx
aryan532920
 
According to the authors, privacy and security go hand in hand; .docx
According to the authors, privacy and security go hand in hand; .docxAccording to the authors, privacy and security go hand in hand; .docx
According to the authors, privacy and security go hand in hand; .docx
aryan532920
 
According to Gilbert and Troitzsch (2005), Foundations of Simula.docx
According to Gilbert and Troitzsch (2005), Foundations of Simula.docxAccording to Gilbert and Troitzsch (2005), Foundations of Simula.docx
According to Gilbert and Troitzsch (2005), Foundations of Simula.docx
aryan532920
 
According to Klein (2016), using ethical absolutism and ethical .docx
According to Klein (2016), using ethical absolutism and ethical .docxAccording to Klein (2016), using ethical absolutism and ethical .docx
According to Klein (2016), using ethical absolutism and ethical .docx
aryan532920
 
According to Franks and Smallwood (2013), information has become.docx
According to Franks and Smallwood (2013), information has become.docxAccording to Franks and Smallwood (2013), information has become.docx
According to Franks and Smallwood (2013), information has become.docx
aryan532920
 
According to the Council on Social Work Education, Competency 5.docx
According to the Council on Social Work Education, Competency 5.docxAccording to the Council on Social Work Education, Competency 5.docx
According to the Council on Social Work Education, Competency 5.docx
aryan532920
 
According to the authors, privacy and security go hand in hand; and .docx
According to the authors, privacy and security go hand in hand; and .docxAccording to the authors, privacy and security go hand in hand; and .docx
According to the authors, privacy and security go hand in hand; and .docx
aryan532920
 
According to recent surveys, China, India, and the Philippines are t.docx
According to recent surveys, China, India, and the Philippines are t.docxAccording to recent surveys, China, India, and the Philippines are t.docx
According to recent surveys, China, India, and the Philippines are t.docx
aryan532920
 
According to the authors, countries that lag behind the rest of the .docx
According to the authors, countries that lag behind the rest of the .docxAccording to the authors, countries that lag behind the rest of the .docx
According to the authors, countries that lag behind the rest of the .docx
aryan532920
 
According to Peskin et al. (2013) in our course reader, Studies on .docx
According to Peskin et al. (2013) in our course reader, Studies on .docxAccording to Peskin et al. (2013) in our course reader, Studies on .docx
According to Peskin et al. (2013) in our course reader, Studies on .docx
aryan532920
 
According to Franks and Smallwood (2013), information has become the.docx
According to Franks and Smallwood (2013), information has become the.docxAccording to Franks and Smallwood (2013), information has become the.docx
According to Franks and Smallwood (2013), information has become the.docx
aryan532920
 
According to Ang (2011), how is Social Media management differen.docx
According to Ang (2011), how is Social Media management differen.docxAccording to Ang (2011), how is Social Media management differen.docx
According to Ang (2011), how is Social Media management differen.docx
aryan532920
 
According to (Alsaidi & Kausar (2018), It is expected that by 2020,.docx
According to (Alsaidi & Kausar (2018), It is expected that by 2020,.docxAccording to (Alsaidi & Kausar (2018), It is expected that by 2020,.docx
According to (Alsaidi & Kausar (2018), It is expected that by 2020,.docx
aryan532920
 

More from aryan532920 (20)

According to the NASW Code of Ethics section 6.04 (NASW, 2008), .docx
According to the NASW Code of Ethics section 6.04 (NASW, 2008), .docxAccording to the NASW Code of Ethics section 6.04 (NASW, 2008), .docx
According to the NASW Code of Ethics section 6.04 (NASW, 2008), .docx
 
According to the text, crime has been part of the human condition si.docx
According to the text, crime has been part of the human condition si.docxAccording to the text, crime has been part of the human condition si.docx
According to the text, crime has been part of the human condition si.docx
 
According to Ronald Story and Bruce Laurie, The dozen years between.docx
According to Ronald Story and Bruce Laurie, The dozen years between.docxAccording to Ronald Story and Bruce Laurie, The dozen years between.docx
According to Ronald Story and Bruce Laurie, The dozen years between.docx
 
According to Kirk (2016), most of your time will be spent work with .docx
According to Kirk (2016), most of your time will be spent work with .docxAccording to Kirk (2016), most of your time will be spent work with .docx
According to Kirk (2016), most of your time will be spent work with .docx
 
According to the Council on Social Work Education, Competency 5 Eng.docx
According to the Council on Social Work Education, Competency 5 Eng.docxAccording to the Council on Social Work Education, Competency 5 Eng.docx
According to the Council on Social Work Education, Competency 5 Eng.docx
 
According to Kirk (2016), most of our time will be spent working.docx
According to Kirk (2016), most of our time will be spent working.docxAccording to Kirk (2016), most of our time will be spent working.docx
According to Kirk (2016), most of our time will be spent working.docx
 
According to Kirk (2016), most of your time will be spent working wi.docx
According to Kirk (2016), most of your time will be spent working wi.docxAccording to Kirk (2016), most of your time will be spent working wi.docx
According to Kirk (2016), most of your time will be spent working wi.docx
 
According to Davenport (2014) the organizational value of healthcare.docx
According to Davenport (2014) the organizational value of healthcare.docxAccording to Davenport (2014) the organizational value of healthcare.docx
According to Davenport (2014) the organizational value of healthcare.docx
 
According to the authors, privacy and security go hand in hand; .docx
According to the authors, privacy and security go hand in hand; .docxAccording to the authors, privacy and security go hand in hand; .docx
According to the authors, privacy and security go hand in hand; .docx
 
According to Gilbert and Troitzsch (2005), Foundations of Simula.docx
According to Gilbert and Troitzsch (2005), Foundations of Simula.docxAccording to Gilbert and Troitzsch (2005), Foundations of Simula.docx
According to Gilbert and Troitzsch (2005), Foundations of Simula.docx
 
According to Klein (2016), using ethical absolutism and ethical .docx
According to Klein (2016), using ethical absolutism and ethical .docxAccording to Klein (2016), using ethical absolutism and ethical .docx
According to Klein (2016), using ethical absolutism and ethical .docx
 
According to Franks and Smallwood (2013), information has become.docx
According to Franks and Smallwood (2013), information has become.docxAccording to Franks and Smallwood (2013), information has become.docx
According to Franks and Smallwood (2013), information has become.docx
 
According to the Council on Social Work Education, Competency 5.docx
According to the Council on Social Work Education, Competency 5.docxAccording to the Council on Social Work Education, Competency 5.docx
According to the Council on Social Work Education, Competency 5.docx
 
According to the authors, privacy and security go hand in hand; and .docx
According to the authors, privacy and security go hand in hand; and .docxAccording to the authors, privacy and security go hand in hand; and .docx
According to the authors, privacy and security go hand in hand; and .docx
 
According to recent surveys, China, India, and the Philippines are t.docx
According to recent surveys, China, India, and the Philippines are t.docxAccording to recent surveys, China, India, and the Philippines are t.docx
According to recent surveys, China, India, and the Philippines are t.docx
 
According to the authors, countries that lag behind the rest of the .docx
According to the authors, countries that lag behind the rest of the .docxAccording to the authors, countries that lag behind the rest of the .docx
According to the authors, countries that lag behind the rest of the .docx
 
According to Peskin et al. (2013) in our course reader, Studies on .docx
According to Peskin et al. (2013) in our course reader, Studies on .docxAccording to Peskin et al. (2013) in our course reader, Studies on .docx
According to Peskin et al. (2013) in our course reader, Studies on .docx
 
According to Franks and Smallwood (2013), information has become the.docx
According to Franks and Smallwood (2013), information has become the.docxAccording to Franks and Smallwood (2013), information has become the.docx
According to Franks and Smallwood (2013), information has become the.docx
 
According to Ang (2011), how is Social Media management differen.docx
According to Ang (2011), how is Social Media management differen.docxAccording to Ang (2011), how is Social Media management differen.docx
According to Ang (2011), how is Social Media management differen.docx
 
According to (Alsaidi & Kausar (2018), It is expected that by 2020,.docx
According to (Alsaidi & Kausar (2018), It is expected that by 2020,.docxAccording to (Alsaidi & Kausar (2018), It is expected that by 2020,.docx
According to (Alsaidi & Kausar (2018), It is expected that by 2020,.docx
 

Recently uploaded

Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
beazzy04
 
678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf
678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf
678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf
CarlosHernanMontoyab2
 
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCECLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
BhavyaRajput3
 
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfWelcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
TechSoup
 
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdfAdditional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
joachimlavalley1
 
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfThe Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
kaushalkr1407
 
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe..."Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
SACHIN R KONDAGURI
 
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxFrancesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx
EduSkills OECD
 
The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptx
The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptxThe Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptx
The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptx
DhatriParmar
 
Model Attribute Check Company Auto Property
Model Attribute  Check Company Auto PropertyModel Attribute  Check Company Auto Property
Model Attribute Check Company Auto Property
Celine George
 
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptxSupporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Jisc
 
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
siemaillard
 
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.pptThesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
EverAndrsGuerraGuerr
 
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxSynthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Pavel ( NSTU)
 
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdfUnit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
Thiyagu K
 
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativeEmbracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Peter Windle
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
Delapenabediema
 
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
Nguyen Thanh Tu Collection
 
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdfspecial B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
Special education needs
 
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
JosvitaDsouza2
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
Sha'Carri Richardson Presentation 202345
 
678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf
678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf
678020731-Sumas-y-Restas-Para-Colorear.pdf
 
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCECLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
CLASS 11 CBSE B.St Project AIDS TO TRADE - INSURANCE
 
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfWelcome to TechSoup   New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdf
 
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdfAdditional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
Additional Benefits for Employee Website.pdf
 
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfThe Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdf
 
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe..."Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
"Protectable subject matters, Protection in biotechnology, Protection of othe...
 
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptxFrancesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx
Francesca Gottschalk - How can education support child empowerment.pptx
 
The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptx
The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptxThe Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptx
The Accursed House by Émile Gaboriau.pptx
 
Model Attribute Check Company Auto Property
Model Attribute  Check Company Auto PropertyModel Attribute  Check Company Auto Property
Model Attribute Check Company Auto Property
 
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptxSupporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
Supporting (UKRI) OA monographs at Salford.pptx
 
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
 
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.pptThesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
Thesis Statement for students diagnonsed withADHD.ppt
 
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxSynthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptx
 
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdfUnit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
Unit 2- Research Aptitude (UGC NET Paper I).pdf
 
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic ImperativeEmbracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
Embracing GenAI - A Strategic Imperative
 
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official PublicationThe Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
The Challenger.pdf DNHS Official Publication
 
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
BÀI TẬP BỔ TRỢ TIẾNG ANH GLOBAL SUCCESS LỚP 3 - CẢ NĂM (CÓ FILE NGHE VÀ ĐÁP Á...
 
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdfspecial B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
special B.ed 2nd year old paper_20240531.pdf
 
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
1.4 modern child centered education - mahatma gandhi-2.pptx
 

1 Luby’s Where do they go from here1 In 2015, Lu.docx

  • 1. 1 Luby’s: Where do they go from here?1 In 2015, Luby’s Inc. had completed a decade of dramatic change. The changes really began in 2000, when Luby’s stock price had fallen from $33.00 per share in 1986 to $4.00 per share. At that time, Texas restaurateurs Christopher and Harris Pappas announced that they had purchased six percent of Luby’s stock and were considering additional investments. The brothers had a long history of success in the casual dining segment of the restaurant industry. They owned Pappas Restaurants, Inc., a privately held firm with 60 restaurants operating in the casual dining segment under the names Pappas Seafood House, Pappasito’s Cantina, Pappadeaux, Pappas Bar-B-Que, and Pappas Brothers Steak House. The Pappas brothers joined Luby’s as CEO/President and COO in March of 2001 and by mid-2001, both the officers and
  • 2. directors of the firm had changed substantially. Cost cutting and other operational changes to the firm helped raised the stock price, but profits remained low. While Harris focused on the Pappas Restaurants, Inc. business, Christopher took over as President and CEO of Luby’s. The brothers recognized that Luby’s faced a number of challenges. As CEO Chris Pappas stated when they invested in the firm, “The road to improved financial performance will not be easy, but Harris Pappas and I are investing significant effort and resources in Luby’s in a concerted effort to reach this objective” (Ruggless, 2001, p. 11). The firm continued to focus exclusively on its cafeterias until 2007, when they brought the firm’s made-from-scratch food to institutional cafeterias (hospitals, schools, etc.) expanding into the culinary services business, but profitability remained elusive. The stock dropped below $4.00 again in 2009 when the firm reported a net loss of $26.4 million—more than 10% of total sales. More drastic change appeared to be necessary. 1
  • 3. This case was created by the author as a teaching tool. It is not meant to demonstrate either effective or ineffective management. The material used in this case was collected from publicly available documents filed by the company and other sources. Any errors in the material are the fault of the author and not of the company. 2 The next year brought a more change, when the firm acquired gourmet hamburger chain Fuddruckers, Inc. for $63.1 million in cash following the bankruptcy of Fuddruckers’ parent company. The acquisition added 56 Fuddruckers locations, three KooKooRoo Chicken Bistro locations, and Luby’s become the franchisor for an additional 130 Fuddruckers franchise locations. The firm followed this diversification in 2012, with the acquisition of all 23 Cheeseburger in Paradise locations for $10.3 million in cash. Whether those changes will resolve the profitability issue, though, remained to be seen. Table 1 summarizes some of the
  • 4. changes to Luby’s over the last dozen years. Table 1: Changes in Luby’s (2002-2014) Category 2014 2002 Number of Cafeterias 96 193 Fuddruckers (Company-operated) 71 0 Fuddruckers (Franchises) 110 0 Culinary Contract Service Locations 21 0 Cheeseburger in Paradise 8 0 KooKooRoo Chicken Bistro 2 (closed after fiscal year-end) 0 Number of States 36 10 Owned Locations 92 124 Leased Locations 82 69 Number of Employees 8490 11,000 Store Managers ( including Sr., Assoc., and Asst. Managers) 739 600 Executive/Administrative Staff 142 200 The Industry
  • 5. Luby’s competed primarily in the Family Dining and Casual Dining sectors of the Restaurant industry (SIC 5812, NAICS 722212). Luby’s closest competitors in the cafeteria business were Furr’s cafeterias and Piccadilly cafeterias, but they also viewed other “family dining” restaurants to be close competitors. The addition of Fuddruckers and Cheeseburger in Paradise expanded the scope of the firm’s competitors to include firms like Ruby Tuesday and Red Robin Gourmet Burgers. 3 The restaurant industry had four major segments: Quick Service (McDonald’s, Long John Silver), Casual Dining (Applebees, Outback Steakhouse), Family Dining (Luby’s, Ryan’s, Cracker Barrel), and Specialty Dining (Starbucks, Krispy Kreme), with cafeterias included in the family dining segment. No single firm had a significant share of industry sales. The Family Dining segment was further subdivided between Full service and Limited service formats. Full
  • 6. service restaurants offered table service and price meals by the dish, often preparing the meals to order. Buffet concept restaurants (Limited service) were self- service and usually all-you-can-eat with a single price for all. Cafeterias combined self-service with pricing by the dish. Both cafeterias and buffets generally used batch preparation rather than single meal preparation. Cafeteria chains had taken a beating, largely from increased competition with casual dining and buffet concept restaurants, but were also being squeezed by rising utility and food costs. Most chains have brought in CEOs from the casual dining sector, as well as attempting new concepts and horizontal integration, but with limited success. Furr’s Restaurant Group, of Richardson, TX, filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy in January of 2003 and again in 2014, when its assets were sold to creditors. Furr’s still operates cafeterias under the Furr’s and Bishop’s names. Piccadilly, headquartered in Baton Rouge, LA, purchased Morrison’s Restaurants (a rival cafeteria chain) in 1998 for $46 million, bringing it to over 200 units. Piccadilly also filed
  • 7. for bankruptcy in 2012 and was sold to creditors in 2014 though it still operates 60 locations. The main customers for cafeterias tend to be at or near retirement age, brand loyal, and price- sensitive. As stock analyst Preston Silvey noted, “It’s a generational concept, viewed in the younger people’s eyes as a place their parents or grandparents went. For them to survive, they have to develop some concepts to bring in the younger crowd” (Ruggless, 2001). 4 The outlook for restaurants as a whole is more positive than for cafeterias. Per capita spending on meals away from home has increased with each generation. In 1955, 25 percent of meals were eaten away from home. By 1996, that percentage had risen to 44 percent. U.S. restaurant revenues, which in 1970 totaled $42.8 billion in current U.S. dollars, had risen to $683.4 billion by 2014. These trends among U. S. consumers are attributed to faster-paced lifestyles, an increase in the percentage of women working outside the home, and a rise in the
  • 8. number of single-parent households. Table 2 presents sales and growth forecasts for the industry by format. Table 2: Projected Food and Drink Sales, 2014, by Type of Outlet Type of Outlet Sales (percent of Total) Growth Rate Full Service Restaurants 49.2 2.6% Limited Service Restaurants 39.0 4.4% Buffets and Cafeterias 0.7 2.5% Social Caterers 1.3 4.6% Snack and nonalcoholic beverage bars 5 5.0% Bars and Taverns 4 3.4% Total Eating and Drinking Places 100 3.6% Source: National Restaurant Association Forecast (www.restaurant.org) The National Restaurant Association’s Restaurant Trends Study, 2013, found locally sourced food, gluten-free items, and healthful kids’ meals to be
  • 9. the top menu trends for both full and limited service restaurants. The top challenges noted by restaurant managers in the survey were healthcare reform, government regulation, the economy, and recruiting and retaining employees. The restaurant business is notorious for high employee turnover and is extremely labor intensive, with sales per full time employee running at less than $73,000 per year—notably lower than for most industries. The industry is also highly fragmented. With more than 990,000 competitors in the U.S., more than 90 percent employ less than 50 employees and seven out of every 10 firms in the restaurant industry are single-unit independents with less than 20 employees. Sales per unit in http://www.restaurant.org/ 5 full service restaurants average $874,000 per year—slightly higher than the $777,000 average for a limited table service restaurant. Table 3 presents industry averages for the Restaurant industry.
  • 10. Table 3: Industry Financial Information Full Service Restaurants (NAICS 722210) N = 2,587 Limited Table Service Restaurants (NAICS 722211) N = 187 Inc. Stmt. Data % of Sales $/Seat % of Sales $/Seat Total Sales 100% $5295 100% $8,456 Cost of Food 33.3 $1,776 32.5 $2,397 Payroll & Benefits 33.9 $1,758 27.5 $1,964 Direct Operating Exp. 5.7 $307 4.8 $317 Marketing 1.9% $90 3.3 $248 Utilities 3.2 $175 2.9 $236 Gen. & Admin. Exp. 3.0 $156 2.6 $171 Occupancy Expense (Rent, Ins. & Taxes) 7.0 $366 7.5 $532 Balance Sheet Data % of Assets % of Assets Cash 12.4 13.2 Accounts Recvble .9 2.6
  • 11. Inventory 3.3 6.0 Other Current Assets 2.6 3.3 Fixed Assets 57.0 54.8 Intangibles 14.2 9.8 Other L. T. Assets 9.6 10.3 Current Liabilities 36.1 40.0 L.T. Debt 45.6 37.9 Other L. T. Liabilities 8.5 10.4 Net Worth 9.9 11.7 Selected Fin. Ratios Current .6 1.4 Quick .4 .4 Fixed Assets/Worth 16.2 3.9 Debt/Worth 26.7 5.6 NS/Fixed Assets 5.5 6.5 NS/Total Assets 3.0 3.2 Sources: National Restaurant Association Industry Operations Report Risk Management Associates Key Financial Ratios
  • 12. The Company Luby’s can trace its roots to a San Antonio, TX cafeteria which originally opened in 1947. The company went public in 1973, with shares listed on the New York Stock Exchange 6 (symbol LUB). In 1987 the firm had opened its 100 th location and hit the 200 mark 10 years later. By 2014, the firm was operating four separate business units as detailed below. Restaurant Operations From its headquarters in Houston, TX, Luby’s operated restaurants under several brand names as discussed below. In November of 2014, Luby’s operated 174 restaurants at 169 property locations, of which 92 were located on property owned by the firm and 82 on leased premises. Five of the operating locations were Combo locations but considered two restaurants
  • 13. (Luby’s and Fuddruckers side-by-side). Two operating locations were primarily Luby’s Cafeterias, but also served Fuddruckers hamburgers. One operating location was a Bob Luby’s Seafood Grill. Luby’s Cafeterias have seating capacity for 250 to 300 customers at each location while Fuddruckers locations generally seat 125 to 200 customers and Cheeseburger in Paradise locations generally seat between 180 and 220. See Table 4 below for a list of locations in November of 2014. Table 4: Company owned and operated locations State Locations Texas Houston Metro 54 San Antonio Metro 18 Rio Grande Valley 13 Dallas/Fort Worth Metro 14 Austin 11 Other Texas Markets 17
  • 14. California 9 Illinois 6 Arizona 5 Maryland 5 Virginia 3 Georgia 3 Oklahoma 3 Other States 13 Total 174 7 Luby’s Cafeteria Following the acquisitions, the Luby’s brand still accounted for 63% of the firm’s total revenues. In its 96 cafeteria locations (92 in Texas, 2 in Oklahoma, 1 in Arkansas and 1 in Louisiana), the firm emphasized made-from-scratch food from a serving line including 15 to 22 entrées, 12 to 14 vegetable dishes, 8 to 10 salads, and 10 to 12
  • 15. varieties of desserts daily. Each dish was available a-la-carte or as part of several combination meals like the popular LuAnn Platter. Scratch preparation was integral to the Luby’s vision—the firm even made its own mayonnaise. Luby’s recipes have been featured in a number of publications and the firm received several awards for its 60 th anniversary recipe book in 2008. Most cafeterias were open for lunch and dinner seven days a week and for breakfast on the weekend. All locations sold food-to-go orders, which accounted for 13.0% of restaurant sales in fiscal year 2013 and 2014. Luby’s staff regularly reviewed menus and introduced new and seasonal food preferences. Each restaurant was operated as a separate unit under a general manager who has responsibility for day-to-day operations, including food production and personnel selection and supervision. In addition to the general manager, each location had one associate manager and
  • 16. one to two assistant managers who oversaw the restaurant’s full-time and part-time associates working in overlapping shifts. An area leader supervised each general manager. Each area leader was responsible for approximately 7 to 10 units, depending on location. Quality control teams visited each location to work with staff on maintaining consistency in the firm’s recipes, train personnel in new techniques, and implement new procedures within the company. 8 In fiscal year 2013, the company opened a new Luby’s cafeteria and a new Fuddruckers on the same property with a common wall but separate kitchens and dining areas. In 2014, four more of these combination locations were added. These Combo locations shared a general manager. Fuddruckers Most of the remaining sales came from the Fuddruckers brand. Luby’s owned and
  • 17. operated 71 Fuddruckers restaurants three of which were converted from Cheeseburger in Paradise locations in 2014. Boasting that they serve the “World’s Greatest Hamburgers,” Fuddruckers locations featured an open kitchen where guests could see burgers freshly prepared from scratch all day. Fuddruckers served “fresh, never frozen, 100% USDA All- American premium-cut beef” with no fillers or artificial ingredients added. Fuddruckers sesame-topped buns were baked from scratch all day in each restaurant’s bakery. As in the cafeterias, guests at Fuddruckers ordered and paid as they enter the restaurant. They then take the cooked-to-order burger to Fuddruckers’ Build Your Own® produce bar where they added their choice of fresh veggies and signature Fuddruckers condiments. While Fuddruckers’ signature burger accounts for approximately 47.0% of Fuddruckers restaurant sales, the menu also included exotic burgers such as buffalo, steak sandwiches, chicken breast sandwiches, hot dogs, a variety of salads, fish sandwiches, wedge-cut French
  • 18. fries, onion rings, soft drinks, handmade milkshakes, and bakery items. Beer and wine were served but account for less than 2% of restaurant sales. Fuddruckers’ decor had a casual, Americana theme. 9 Each Fuddruckers was staffed by a general manager, two or three assistant managers, and 25 to 45 other associates, including full-time and part-time associates working in overlapping shifts. With Fuddruckers’ self-service concept, the restaurants do not employ waitstaff. Fuddruckers restaurant operations were divided into three geographic regions, each supervised by an area vice president. The three regions were further divided into a total of eight areas, each supervised by an area leader who oversaw 7 to 8 restaurants. Franchising In addition to the company-owned locations, Luby’s had 51 franchisees operating another
  • 19. 110 Fuddruckers restaurants in locations across the U.S. and in several other countries, four of which were added in 2014. Eighteen franchise owners each owned from two to twelve restaurants. The thirty-three remaining franchise owners owned one restaurant each. The Fuddruckers acquisition came with 130 franchise locations, some of which were later closed or purchased as company-owned restaurants, but Luby’s continues to seek new franchising opportunities. Table Five details those locations. A standard franchise agreement generally has an initial term of 20 years. Franchise agreements typically grant franchisees an exclusive territorial license to operate a single restaurant within a specified area, usually a four-mile radius surrounding the franchised restaurant. Franchisees pay an initial franchise fee and annual royalty payments (based on franchise location profits). In return, Fuddruckers provided franchise assistance for: site selection, prototypical architectural plans, interior and exterior design and layout, training, marketing and sales techniques, assistance by a Fuddruckers
  • 20. “opening team” at the time a franchised restaurant opens, and operations and accounting guidelines set forth in various 10 policies and procedures manuals. Franchisees were responsible for all direct costs for the development, construction and operation of their restaurants. Table 5: Fuddruckers Franchise Locations State/Country Franchises Texas Houston Metro 1 Dallas/Fort Worth Metro 10 Other Texas Markets 13 California 8 Florida 7 Georgia 3 Idaho 1
  • 21. Louisiana 3 Maryland 2 Massachusetts 5 Michigan 5 Missouri 3 Montana 5 Nebraska 1 Nevada 2 New Jersey 2 New Mexico 3 North Carolina 2 Oregon 1 Pennsylvania 4 South Carolina 7 South Dakota 2 Tennessee 3 Virginia 3 Wisconsin 2
  • 22. Other States 2 Canada 1 Chile 1 Dominican Republic 1 Italy 2 Mexico 1 Panama 1 Puerto Rico 5 Total 110 11 All franchisees were required to operate their restaurants in accordance with Fuddruckers standards and specifications, including controls over menu items, food quality and preparation. At least three managers per restaurant must successfully complete the firm’s training program. Franchised restaurants were evaluated regularly for compliance with franchise agreements and
  • 23. company standards during periodic, unannounced, on-site inspections and standards evaluation reports. Cheeseburger in Paradise Developed in collaboration with singer Jimmy Buffet and based on one of his most popular songs, Cheeseburger in Paradise was a casual, full- service restaurant and bar with a tropical theme. The acquisition was a disappointment. Only eight of the purchased 23 Cheeseburger in Paradise locations still operated under that name at the end of 2014. Other locations were closed or converted to the Fuddruckers format. The remaining locations were located in high traffic areas near successful malls and tourist attractions. Culinary Contract Services In November 2014, Luby’s operated culinary contract services at 25 locations; 18 in the Houston, Texas area, three in Louisiana, two in Austin, Texas, and one each in Florida and Oklahoma. Luby’s Culinary Contract Services provided food service management to healthcare,
  • 24. educational, and corporate dining facilities. The healthcare accounts were full service and typically included in-room delivery, catering, vending, coffee service, and retail dining. In fiscal year 2014, the firm had servicing contracts for 13 long-term acute care hospitals, one acute care medical center, one ambulatory surgical center, one behavioral hospital, two business and industry clients, three higher education institutions, one Children’s Hospital, two Medical office buildings, and one freestanding coffee 12 shop located inside an office building. Luby’s managers believed they had a unique ability to deliver culinary services including facility design and procurement as well as nutrition and branded food services to business clients. Properties Luby’s owned the underlying land and buildings on which 71 of the Luby’s Cafeterias and 22 Fuddruckers restaurants were located. Five of these restaurant properties contained excess
  • 25. building space or an extra building on the property which had ten tenants unaffiliated with Luby’s, Inc. In addition to the owned locations, 25 Luby’s Cafeteria restaurants, 48 Fuddruckers restaurants, and 8 Cheeseburger in Paradise restaurants were operated on leased property. Most of the leases were fixed-dollar rentals, but required the firm to pay additional amounts related to property taxes, hazard insurance, and maintenance of common areas. Table 6: Property and Equipment, Intangible Assets and Goodwill (net of impairment and accumulated depreciation ) August 27, 2014 August 28, 2013 Estimated Useful Lives (years) (In thousands) Land
  • 27. Restaurant equipment and furnishings 131,932 116,664 3 to 15 Buildings 181,535 172,342 20 to 33 Leasehold and leasehold improvements 40,835 39,108 Office furniture and equipment 7,537 7,444 3 to 10 Construction in progress 10,313 7,814 — 441,919 405,563 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization (228,427) (215,066) Property and equipment, net $ 213,492 $ 190,497 Intangible assets, net $ 24,014 $ 25,517 21
  • 28. Goodwill $ 1,681 $ 2,169 The firm also retained three owned properties and seven leased properties to develop for future use as well as one owned non-operating property held for resale and valued at $1.0 13 million. The firm owned four other properties. One location was used as a bakeshop supporting the baked products for operating restaurants. One location was leased to third party tenants utilizing the entire building and two were leased to Fuddruckers franchisees. Marketing Luby’s historically relied on word-of-mouth marketing. Prior to 1991, the firm averaged less than 0.5% of sales for its marketing budget. During the 1990s, the firm toyed with a more aggressive advertising strategy--gradually increasing its marketing budget to a high in 1999 of about 2.5% of sales. More recently, the firm has spent approximately 1.1% of restaurant sales on
  • 29. marketing, across radio and television advertising, billboards, direct mailings, movie theater advertising, and social media. Total advertising expense (included in other operating expenses) was $4.6 million, $3.9 million, and $2.4 million in fiscal 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively. The firm’s market research indicated several major customer groups frequent Luby’s cafeterias: families with small children, seniors, shoppers, travelers, and business people. These groups appreciated the opportunity to select a more balanced meal than those offered by most quick service and casual dining establishments. The firm would like to emphasize more targeted marketing to families but seniors were still a significantly higher percentage of the customer base for Luby’s than for non-cafeteria competitors. Younger generations still tended to view Luby’s as the place their grandparents (or great grandparents) eat. By contrast, the Cheeseburger in Paradise customer was younger, while the customers for Fuddruckers included a wider range of ages. Purchasing and Distribution
  • 30. Purchasing had the most radical change in recent years. Prior to 1998, local cafeteria managers conducted almost all their own buying. In 1999, the firm centralized purchasing to 14 obtain quantity discounts. For each of its three major purchasing regions, the firm contracted with a competitively selected prime supplier. Centralizing purchasing and distribution was intended to allow Luby’s to reduce costs through volume buying and by minimizing suppliers’ distribution costs. In keeping with its commitment to fresh, made-from-scratch food, the firm purchased locally sourced ingredients whenever practical. Human Resources Luby’s enjoyed generally good labor relations. None of the firm’s employees were unionized and many employees had been with Luby’s for years—a rarity in an industry characterized by high employee turnover. Hourly employees earned between $7.81 and $13.00
  • 31. an hour depending on length of service. In dramatic contrast to other firms in the restaurant industry, substantially all of the employees received group life, health and disability insurance, a two-week paid vacation (three weeks following five years of service), free meals, and optional dental, vision, and prescription drug coverage. All were covered by insurance and retirement plans. The voluntary 401(k) plan voluntary was available for any employee over the age of 21 with at least one year of continuous employment with the company. The firm matched 25 percent of each employee’s contributions to a maximum of four percent of salary, which cost the firm just over $500,000 in 2014. Luby’s had long emphasized in-house training. New managers attended a several-month- long program before moving to a restaurant as an Assistant Manager where training continued in all aspects of the food service business. Once promoted to Associate Manager, they were eligible for profit sharing based on store sales and profitability. For Senior Managers, profit sharing can more than double their salaries. The majority of the
  • 32. firm’s senior managers had been 15 with the firm for 10 or more years. Low turnover was of particular interest since management tenure in the restaurant industry was strongly tied to store performance. Technology and Support Services The firm leased a service facility in Houston, TX from the Pappas brothers. The facility had 21,000 square feet of warehouse space plus 5,644 square feet of office space. From this facility, the firm dispatched repair and service teams to restaurants having equipment problems. The facility also fabricated proprietary equipment for its restaurants. These systems had higher performance and longer life than comparable products generally available on the market. The firm also maintained an active social media presence and several websites which provided restaurant locations, daily menus, and other information about the firm. The websites offered customers the option of ordering Luby’s-to-go meals by
  • 33. phone, fax, or online. A similar Fuddruckers application was in development. The information system at Luby’s also allowed the firm to move much of its training online. Conclusion Despite the changes Luby’s had made, the stock had underperformed all comparison groups including the S&P SmallCap 600 Index and an industry peer group consisting of Bob Evans Farms, Inc., CBRL Group, Inc., Denny’s Corporation, Frisch Restaurant Group, Red Robin Gourmet Burgers and Ruby Tuesday Inc. These companies were multi-unit family and casual dining restaurant operators in the mid-price range (Table 7). Table 7: Comparison of stock price 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Luby’s, Inc. 100.00 61.33 69.07 64.15 88.96 102.21 S&P 500 Index—Total Return 100.00 78.89 82.76 98.08 116.03 137.51 S&P 500 Restaurant Index 100.00 98.65 128.73 173.19 188.78 225.69
  • 34. Peer Group Index Only 100.00 102.59 114.98 132.66 167.20 238.64 Peer Group Index + Luby’s Inc. 100.00 99.80 111.76 127.71 161.55 228.71 16 Other measures of performance had been similarly disappointing. Same store sales company-wide were flat in 2014, but differed across brands. While same store sales declined 3.5% at the Fuddruckers restaurants, they were offset by increases at Luby’s locations and at the single Combo location which had been open more than two years. Total revenues were up, mostly from the Luby’s, CCS, and Combo locations. Despite the sales increase, the firm again reported a net loss of $1.6 million for 2014. While some segments of the company reported profits, they were more than offset by a $2.4 million loss from the Cheeseburger in Paradise brand and expenses related to a dozen store openings.
  • 35. While the firm has been discounted by many analysts, CEO Christopher Pappas began aggressively buying the company’s stock in early 2015. In January, he purchased 43,254 shares for $203,884.79 and followed those purchases with an additional $386,836.00 investment, acquiring another 78,381 shares during the first week of February. Those purchases raised his total ownership to 3,586,124 shares valued at approximately $18,181,648.68. Whether that investment was a wise one depends on the firm’s strategy in the coming years. 17 References Brewer, Jim (Feb 9th, 2015). Luby's CEO Purchases $115,737.96 in Stock (LUB). WKRB News. Fuddruckers website, (www.Fuddruckers.com). Koo Koo Roo website, (www.kookooroo.com).
  • 36. Luby’s, Inc. SEC filing forms 10-K (1998-2014) Luby’s company website, (www.Lubys.com). Luby’s Culinary Services website, (www.Lubyscs.com). National Restaurant Association, Restaurant Spending, July, 2002, available at www.restaurant.org National Restaurant Association, Restaurant Industry Forecast, 2014, available at www.restaurant.org National Restaurant Association, Industry at a glance, 2014, available at www.restaurant.org National Restaurant Association, Restaurant Trend Study, 2013, available at www.restaurant.org Risk Management Associates (2014). Annual Statement Studies and Key Financial Ratios. Ruggless, Ron (2001). Luby’s woes likely to continue, but
  • 37. management is optimistic. Nation’s Restaurant News July 9, 2001. Ruggless, Ron (2001). Struggling cafeteria chains draft casual dining vets in recovery bids. Nation’s Restaurant News January 20, 2001. Ruggless, Ron (2003). Cafeterias face plate full of pressures. Nation’s Restaurant News January 20, 2003. Siskos, Catherine (2002). Shareholders Unite!, Kiplinger’s Personal Finance, available at www.kiplinger.com U. S. Census Bureau, 1997 Economic Census: Accommodation and Food Services, (www.census.gov). http://www.fuddruckers.com/ http://www.kookooroo.com/ http://www.lubys.com/ http://www.lubyscs.com/
  • 38. http://www.restaurant.org/ http://www.restaurant.org/ http://www.restaurant.org/ http://www.restaurant.org/ http://www.kiplinger.com/ http://www.census.gov/ 18 LUBY’S, INC. Consolidated Statements of Operations (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data, unless otherwise specified 12 Months Ended Aug. 27, 2014 Aug. 28, 2013 Aug. 29, 2012 SALES: Restaurant sales $ 368,267 $ 360,001 $ 324,536 Culinary contract services 18,555 16,693 17,711 Franchise revenue 7,027 6,937 7,232 Vending revenue 532 565 618 TOTAL SALES 394,381 384,196 350,097 COSTS AND EXPENSES:
  • 39. Cost of food 106,284 103,070 90,416 Payroll and related costs 127,792 123,864 112,279 Other operating expenses 68,820 64,918 54,007 Occupancy costs 21,060 21,012 18,097 Opening costs 2,164 783 395 Cost of culinary contract services 16,177 14,874 16,545 Depreciation and amortization 20,062 18,376 17,894 General and administrative expenses 35,038 32,217 30,808 Provision for asset impairments, net 2,498 615 451 Net loss (gain) on disposition of property and equipment (2,357) (1,723) 278 Total costs and expenses 397,538 378,006 341,170 INCOME FROM OPERATIONS (3,157) 6,190 8,927 Interest expense (1,247) (920) (942) Other income, net 1,131 1,052 1,067 Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations (3,273) 6,322 9,052 Provision (benefit) for income taxes, net (1,660) 1,775 1,654
  • 40. Income (loss) from continuing operations (1,613) 4,547 7,398 Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes (1,834) (1,386) (645) NET INCOME (LOSS) $ (3,447) $ 3,161 $ 6,753 Income (loss) per share from continuing operations: Basic (in Dollars per share) $ (0.06) $ 0.16 $ 0.26 Assuming dilution (in Dollars per share) $ (0.06) $ 0.16 $ 0.26 Income (loss) per share from discontinued operations: Basic (in Dollars per share) $ (0.06) $ (0.05) $ (0.02) Assuming dilution (in Dollars per share) $ (0.06) $ (0.05) $ (0.02) Net income (loss) per share: Basic (in Dollars per share) $ (0.12) $ 0.11 $ 0.24 Assuming dilution (in Dollars per share) $ (0.12) $ 0.11 $ 0.24 Weighted-average shares outstanding: Basic (in Shares) 28,812 28,618 28,351
  • 41. Assuming dilution (in Shares) 28,812 28,866 28,429 19 Luby’s, Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $) In Thousands, unless otherwise specified Aug. 27, 2014 Aug. 28, 2013 Current Assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 2,788 $ 1,528 Trade accounts and other receivables, net 4,112 4,083 Food and supply inventories 5,556 4,908 Prepaid expenses 2,815 3,267 Assets related to discontinued operations 52 196 Deferred income taxes 587 1,635 Total current assets 15,910 15,617 Property held for sale 991 449 Assets related to discontinued operations 4,204 4,218 Property and equipment, net 213,492 190,497
  • 42. Intangible assets, net 24,014 25,517 Goodwill 1,681 2,169 Deferred income taxes 11,294 7,923 Other assets 3,849 4,255 Total assets 275,435 250,645 Current Liabilities: Accounts payable 26,269 23,655 Liabilities related to discontinued operations 590 527 Accrued expenses and other liabilities 23,107 21,817 Total current liabilities 49,966 45,999 Credit facility debt 42,000 19,200 Liabilities related to discontinued operations 278 448 Other liabilities 8,167 7,865 Total liabilities 100,411 73,512 SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY Common stock, $0.32 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized; Shares issued were 28,949,523 and 28,804,344, respectively; Shares
  • 43. outstanding were 28,449,523 and 28,304,344, respectively 9,264 9,217 Paid-in capital 27,356 26,065 Retained earnings 143,179 146,626 Less cost of treasury stock, 500,000 shares (4,775) (4,775) Total shareholders’ equity 175,024 177,133 Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $ 275,435 $ 250,645 20 FIVE-YEAR SUMMARY OF OPERATIONS Fiscal Year Ended August 28, 2013 August 29, 2012 August 31, 2011
  • 44. August 25, 2010 August 26, 2009 (364 days) (364 days) (371 days) (364 days) (364 days) (In thousands except per share data) Sales Restaurant sales $ 366,155 $ 324,536 $ 325,383 $ 230,342 $ 245,799 Culinary contract services 16,693 17,711 15,619 13,728 12,970 Franchise revenue 6,937 7,232 7,092 645 –
  • 45. Vending revenue 565 618 654 44 – Total sales 390,350 350,097 348,748 244,759 258,769 Income (loss) from continuing operations 4,222 7,613 2,800 (494 ) (14,032 ) Income (loss) from discontinued operations (a) (937 ) (759 ) 165 (2,399 ) (12,386 ) Net income (loss) $ 3,285 $ 6,854 $ 2,965 $ (2,893 ) $ (26,418 ) Weighted-average shares outstanding: Basic 28,618 28,351 28,237 28,129 28,084 Assuming dilution 28,866 28,429 28,297 28,129 28,084 Total assets $ 250,305 $ 231,017 $ 228,020 $ 242,342 $ 199,406 Total debt $ 19,200 $ 13,000 $ 21,500 $ 41,500 $ – Number of restaurants at fiscal year
  • 46. end 180 154 156 154 119 Number of franchised restaurants at fiscal year end 116 125 122 130 – Number of Culinary Contract Services contracts at fiscal year end 21 18 22 18 15 Costs and Expenses (As a percentage of restaurant sales) Cost of food 28.7 % 27.9 % 28.9 % 27.6 % 27.6 % Payroll and related costs 34.5 % 33.9 % 34.8 % 36.0 % 36.3 % Other operating expenses 18.1 % 16.7 % 17.5 % 17.6 % 19.0 % Occupancy costs 5.9 % 5.4 % 5.6 % 4.0 % 3.4 % 21
  • 47. Segment Data Years Ended August 27, 2014 August 28, 2013 August 29, 2012 (In thousands) Sales: Company-owned restaurants $ 368,799 $ 360,566 $ 325,154 Culinary contract services 18,555 16,693 17,711 Franchising 7,027 6,937 7,232 Total $ 394,381 $ 384,196 $ 350,097 Segment level profit: Company-owned restaurants $ 44,843 $ 47,702 $ 50,355 Culinary contract services 2,378 1,819 1,166
  • 48. Franchising 7,027 6,937 7,232 Total $ 54,248 $ 56,458 $ 58,753 Depreciation and amortization: Company-owned restaurants $ 17,357 $ 16,417 $ 15,990 Culinary contract services 409 440 471 Franchising 767 767 767 Corporate 1,529 752 666 Total $ 20,062 $ 18,376 $ 17,894 Total assets: Company-owned restaurants $ 220,793 $ 203,850 $ 182,162 Culinary contract services 2,724 3,547 3,774 Franchising 13,906 14,674 15,352 Corporate 38,012 28,574 29,601 Total $ 275,435 $ 250,645 $ 230,889 Capital expenditures: Company-owned restaurants $ 43,075 $ 30,741 $ 19,077
  • 49. Culinary contract services 64 95 292 Franchising — — — Corporate 3,045 503 6,476 Total $ 46,184 $ 31,339 $ 25,845 Income (loss) before income taxes and discontinued operations: Segment level profit $ 54,248 $ 56,458 $ 58,753 Opening costs (2,164 ) (783 ) (395 ) Depreciation and amortization (20,062 ) (18,376 ) (17,894 ) General and administrative expenses (35,038 ) (32,217 ) (30,808 ) Provision for asset impairments, net (2,498 ) (615 ) (451 ) Net gain (loss) on disposition of property and equipment 2,357 1,723 (278 ) Interest income 6 9 9 Interest expense (1,247 ) (920 ) (942 ) Other income, net 1,125 1,043 1,058 Total $ (3,273 ) $ 6,322 $ 9,052
  • 50. 22 Figure 1 Luby’s Locations (Source: Luby’s Web Page http://www.lubys.com) Where do we go from here? Luby’s Case John K. Masters, PhD., Cameron University Pam Rodgers, PhD, Cameron University Discussion Questions 1. What is happening in Luby’s Environment? 2. What Resources does Luby’s have to work with? What makes the firm unique? 3. What Strategy would you recommend for Luby’s? 4. What ethical issues would the firm’s current alternatives raise? 5. Which stakeholders are harmed or benefited by particular actions? 6. What effect might Luby’s current situation and a recommended plan for the firm have on the firm’s culture?