Presented by: Ashley Harper – Timaru District Council
Ross Waugh – Waugh Infrastructure
Regional Collaboration
 Mayoral Forum
 Chief Executives Forum
o Canterbury Engineering Managers Group
o Canterbury Finance Managers
o Canterbury Policy Managers Forum
o Canterbury Planning Managers
 Engineering Managers Group
o Infrastructure Strategy
o Section 17a Reviews
o Preparation of Draft Submissions for Chief Executive
Group
o Shared Services/Collaboration
o Water NZ Benchmarking
o Canterbury Stormwater Forum Overview
o Climate Change
o Drinking Water Quality
 Infrastructure Strategy 2015
o Waugh Infrastructure Template: 8 Canterbury TLA’s
 Land Transport
 3 Waters
 Common Approach – very helpful
 Flood Protection excluded – Ecan role
 Timaru District Council Infrastructure Strategy
o Followed Template
o Shared Water Scheme?
o NZTA FAR Share
o Identification and allocation of Growth
o LoS
o Renewal
o LoS Statement
 Canterbury Infrastructure Strategy Template
o Good take up in Canterbury, plus some other areas
o Provided good basis for development of Strategies
o Timaru and Waimakariri adapted further
o Provided good value for money for Councils
o Further analysis of results in subsequent Canterbury
IS Review
o October 2016 update analysis in preparation for 2017
work, will incorporate this Forum’s perspectives
 Canterbury Infrastructure Strategy Review
o Review initiated by Canterbury CE forum
o A range of assumptions were found across
Canterbury, these were highlighted
o Issues and key strategies were recapped
o Review identified peaks in planned infrastructure
procurement
o Canterbury IS Review provides information to feed
into the individual council IS updates
Office of Auditor General Matters Arising Report
 Infrastructure Strategy Expectation
 Visionary
 Telling the story where are, where expecting to be,
how intending to get there
 Realistic
 Relevant assumptions and disclosures
 Relational
 Right Debate
 Credible links to Financial Strategies, demographic
change, other influences
Canterbury Template Review – October 2016
 Typical Engineers template
 Achieved required objective – 2015 LTP support
 Did not fully cover OAG Visionary, Realistic, Relational
statements
 IS template read as summary of AMP’s
 Template requires updating:
o Strategic Thinking, Telling Story
o Examination of issues, sustainability of services
o Interactive, with improved linkages
o Looking beyond 30 year minimum
Canterbury Template Review – Next steps / other issues
Next Steps
 Update template following this Forum
 Include Service Level scenario planning, analysis
 Include long term sustainability analysis in conjunction
with Financial Strategy (s101A/s101B)
Other Issues
 ISO 55000 SAMP linkages
 NZ growth and demographic change dynamics are
‘interesting’ and may require change to lead
infrastructure development
 30 years+ indicative rather than absolute

Canterbury Councils Working Together

  • 1.
    Presented by: AshleyHarper – Timaru District Council Ross Waugh – Waugh Infrastructure
  • 2.
    Regional Collaboration  MayoralForum  Chief Executives Forum o Canterbury Engineering Managers Group o Canterbury Finance Managers o Canterbury Policy Managers Forum o Canterbury Planning Managers
  • 3.
     Engineering ManagersGroup o Infrastructure Strategy o Section 17a Reviews o Preparation of Draft Submissions for Chief Executive Group o Shared Services/Collaboration o Water NZ Benchmarking o Canterbury Stormwater Forum Overview o Climate Change o Drinking Water Quality
  • 4.
     Infrastructure Strategy2015 o Waugh Infrastructure Template: 8 Canterbury TLA’s  Land Transport  3 Waters  Common Approach – very helpful  Flood Protection excluded – Ecan role
  • 5.
     Timaru DistrictCouncil Infrastructure Strategy o Followed Template o Shared Water Scheme? o NZTA FAR Share o Identification and allocation of Growth o LoS o Renewal o LoS Statement
  • 6.
     Canterbury InfrastructureStrategy Template o Good take up in Canterbury, plus some other areas o Provided good basis for development of Strategies o Timaru and Waimakariri adapted further o Provided good value for money for Councils o Further analysis of results in subsequent Canterbury IS Review o October 2016 update analysis in preparation for 2017 work, will incorporate this Forum’s perspectives
  • 7.
     Canterbury InfrastructureStrategy Review o Review initiated by Canterbury CE forum o A range of assumptions were found across Canterbury, these were highlighted o Issues and key strategies were recapped o Review identified peaks in planned infrastructure procurement o Canterbury IS Review provides information to feed into the individual council IS updates
  • 8.
    Office of AuditorGeneral Matters Arising Report  Infrastructure Strategy Expectation  Visionary  Telling the story where are, where expecting to be, how intending to get there  Realistic  Relevant assumptions and disclosures  Relational  Right Debate  Credible links to Financial Strategies, demographic change, other influences
  • 9.
    Canterbury Template Review– October 2016  Typical Engineers template  Achieved required objective – 2015 LTP support  Did not fully cover OAG Visionary, Realistic, Relational statements  IS template read as summary of AMP’s  Template requires updating: o Strategic Thinking, Telling Story o Examination of issues, sustainability of services o Interactive, with improved linkages o Looking beyond 30 year minimum
  • 10.
    Canterbury Template Review– Next steps / other issues Next Steps  Update template following this Forum  Include Service Level scenario planning, analysis  Include long term sustainability analysis in conjunction with Financial Strategy (s101A/s101B) Other Issues  ISO 55000 SAMP linkages  NZ growth and demographic change dynamics are ‘interesting’ and may require change to lead infrastructure development  30 years+ indicative rather than absolute