1
LONG AND MEDIUM-TERM FORECASTING OF
O&M COSTS AND CAPITAL REPLACEMENT
IN AN ELECTRICAL UTILITY
CASE STUDY USING PRINCIPLE OF
EVIDENCE BASED ASSET MANAGEMENT
Ali Zuashkiani : Director of Educational Programs
Centre for Maintenance Optimization and Reliability Engineering
University of Toronto
C-MORE’S CONSORTIUM MEMBERS
3
TRANSFORMERS
THE CHALLENGE - IMPROVE ABILITY TO
FORECAST O & M IN THE MID TO LONG-TERM
PERIOD (3 TO 10 YEARS)
The Key Business Drivers for Improving:
 Regulators developing Incentive Based Rate Methodologies which could set rates for
prolonged period, about 5-years (Long-term forecasts demanded by regulators and Intervener
community to provide context for decisions)
 Utilities must ensure rates adequate to recover expected future costs and leverage opportunity
for improving utility earning potential if can find efficiencies within the rate period
 Improve planning of utility based operational work and staffing needs in the mid to long-term
period
Key Issues:
 Recent trend toward increasing Planned and Corrective O&M
 Demographics indicate increasing number of end-of-life assets and improved correlations to
O&M needed
 Recent trend toward increasing number of mid-life overhauls
 Recent failures necessitate undertaking a one-time specific asset remedial program
5
PREDICTED FUTURE OM&A COSTS
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
2009 2012 2015 2018 2021 2024 2027 2030 2033 2036
Year
6
TRANSFORMER LIFE CYCLE COSTS
6
Installation 10 20 30 40 50 60 Age
PM
CM
Midlife Refurbishment
End of Life OM&A
Related Cost
7
2008 2015 2020 2025 2035 20552030 2040 20502045
C(2009)
C(2010)
C(2011)
C(2012)
C(2013)
C(2014)
C(2015)
RUNNING THE MODEL
8
HISTORICAL PM & CM COSTS
Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Real PM Costs
(2008 dollars) $5,238,141 $3,259,418 $3,757,817 $3,945,578 $4,716,945 $4,549,397 $5,545,000
Real CM Costs
(2008 dollars) N/A $4,321,822 $6,488,246 $4,677,453 $6,386,363 $5,514,660 $5,754,957
PM Costs (i)
CM Costs (i) 0.63
CM(i-1)
CM Costs (i) -0.69
Correlations
9
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CM COSTS AND PM
COSTS
PM(i)0.5191)-PM(i0.749-$6,474,000CM(i) 
2009 2010 2011 2012 2013
PM costs $6,014,100 $6,014,100 $6,014,100 $6,014,100 $6,014,100
CM costs predicted by Utility $5,588,000 $5,671,000 N/A N/A N/A
CM costs predicted by the
formula $5,442,113 $5,090,757 $5,090,757 $5,090,757 $5,090,757
10
TRANSFORMER OVERHAUL & EOL COSTS
10
Installation 10 20 30 40 50 60 Age
CM
PM
11
TYPES OF OVERHAULS
Overhaul Type Name
Leak Reduction
Radiator Refurbishment/Paint
Transformer Dehydration
Operating Spare Equip.
Refurbishment
ULTC Refurbishment
Normal Overhaul
Major Transformer Overhaul
Midlife Refurbishment
12
 The utility, had very limited data-(data existed only for the last
8 years)
 Since there were 19 different classes of transformers, it was
not possible to estimate EOL distributions of transformers
with accuracy based on hard data only
 There was no record of assets which had received overhauls.
This was crucial for building the prediction model.
CHALLENGES
13
Using Expert Opinion?
14
EXTRACTING TACIT KNOWLEDGE
Experts’
knowledge
Prior
distribution
Posterior
distribution


15
Age
0 20 40 60
End of Life time
Age
0 20 40 60
End of Life time
Age
0 20 40 60
End of Life time
Distribution of end of life of
transformers based on
experts’ knowledge
Distribution of end of life of
transformers based on
available data
Distribution of end of life of
transformers based on
both experts opinion and
available data
15
COMBINING TACIT KNOWLEDGE WITH HARD
DATA
16
FUTURE IMPORTANT TRENDS
17
IMPORTANT TRENDS: INCREASING EOL COSTS
TREND
Histogram of Transformers Ages
and End of Life Zone
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2
5
8
11
14
17
20
23
26
29
32
35
38
41
44
47
50
53
56
59
62
65
68
71
74
77
80
Frequency
18
PREDICTED FUTURE EOL COSTS BY THE MODEL
19
IMPORTANT TRENDS: DECREASING OVERHAUL
COSTS TREND
Histogram of Transformers Ages
and Major Overhaul Zone
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
48
50
52
54
56
58
60
62
64
66
68
70
72
74
76
78
80
M
ore
Frequency
20
PREDICTED FUTURE OVERHAUL COSTS BY THE
MODEL
Total Predicted Overhaul Costs
$0
$1,000,000
$2,000,000
$3,000,000
$4,000,000
$5,000,000
$6,000,000
$7,000,000
$8,000,000
$9,000,000
$10,000,000
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
Year
Costin2008dollars
21
QUESTIONS?

Pam

  • 1.
    1 LONG AND MEDIUM-TERMFORECASTING OF O&M COSTS AND CAPITAL REPLACEMENT IN AN ELECTRICAL UTILITY CASE STUDY USING PRINCIPLE OF EVIDENCE BASED ASSET MANAGEMENT Ali Zuashkiani : Director of Educational Programs Centre for Maintenance Optimization and Reliability Engineering University of Toronto
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
    THE CHALLENGE -IMPROVE ABILITY TO FORECAST O & M IN THE MID TO LONG-TERM PERIOD (3 TO 10 YEARS) The Key Business Drivers for Improving:  Regulators developing Incentive Based Rate Methodologies which could set rates for prolonged period, about 5-years (Long-term forecasts demanded by regulators and Intervener community to provide context for decisions)  Utilities must ensure rates adequate to recover expected future costs and leverage opportunity for improving utility earning potential if can find efficiencies within the rate period  Improve planning of utility based operational work and staffing needs in the mid to long-term period Key Issues:  Recent trend toward increasing Planned and Corrective O&M  Demographics indicate increasing number of end-of-life assets and improved correlations to O&M needed  Recent trend toward increasing number of mid-life overhauls  Recent failures necessitate undertaking a one-time specific asset remedial program
  • 5.
    5 PREDICTED FUTURE OM&ACOSTS 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 2009 2012 2015 2018 2021 2024 2027 2030 2033 2036 Year
  • 6.
    6 TRANSFORMER LIFE CYCLECOSTS 6 Installation 10 20 30 40 50 60 Age PM CM Midlife Refurbishment End of Life OM&A Related Cost
  • 7.
    7 2008 2015 20202025 2035 20552030 2040 20502045 C(2009) C(2010) C(2011) C(2012) C(2013) C(2014) C(2015) RUNNING THE MODEL
  • 8.
    8 HISTORICAL PM &CM COSTS Year 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Real PM Costs (2008 dollars) $5,238,141 $3,259,418 $3,757,817 $3,945,578 $4,716,945 $4,549,397 $5,545,000 Real CM Costs (2008 dollars) N/A $4,321,822 $6,488,246 $4,677,453 $6,386,363 $5,514,660 $5,754,957 PM Costs (i) CM Costs (i) 0.63 CM(i-1) CM Costs (i) -0.69 Correlations
  • 9.
    9 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CMCOSTS AND PM COSTS PM(i)0.5191)-PM(i0.749-$6,474,000CM(i)  2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 PM costs $6,014,100 $6,014,100 $6,014,100 $6,014,100 $6,014,100 CM costs predicted by Utility $5,588,000 $5,671,000 N/A N/A N/A CM costs predicted by the formula $5,442,113 $5,090,757 $5,090,757 $5,090,757 $5,090,757
  • 10.
    10 TRANSFORMER OVERHAUL &EOL COSTS 10 Installation 10 20 30 40 50 60 Age CM PM
  • 11.
    11 TYPES OF OVERHAULS OverhaulType Name Leak Reduction Radiator Refurbishment/Paint Transformer Dehydration Operating Spare Equip. Refurbishment ULTC Refurbishment Normal Overhaul Major Transformer Overhaul Midlife Refurbishment
  • 12.
    12  The utility,had very limited data-(data existed only for the last 8 years)  Since there were 19 different classes of transformers, it was not possible to estimate EOL distributions of transformers with accuracy based on hard data only  There was no record of assets which had received overhauls. This was crucial for building the prediction model. CHALLENGES
  • 13.
  • 14.
  • 15.
    15 Age 0 20 4060 End of Life time Age 0 20 40 60 End of Life time Age 0 20 40 60 End of Life time Distribution of end of life of transformers based on experts’ knowledge Distribution of end of life of transformers based on available data Distribution of end of life of transformers based on both experts opinion and available data 15 COMBINING TACIT KNOWLEDGE WITH HARD DATA
  • 16.
  • 17.
    17 IMPORTANT TRENDS: INCREASINGEOL COSTS TREND Histogram of Transformers Ages and End of Life Zone 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2 5 8 11 14 17 20 23 26 29 32 35 38 41 44 47 50 53 56 59 62 65 68 71 74 77 80 Frequency
  • 18.
    18 PREDICTED FUTURE EOLCOSTS BY THE MODEL
  • 19.
    19 IMPORTANT TRENDS: DECREASINGOVERHAUL COSTS TREND Histogram of Transformers Ages and Major Overhaul Zone 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 38 40 42 44 46 48 50 52 54 56 58 60 62 64 66 68 70 72 74 76 78 80 M ore Frequency
  • 20.
    20 PREDICTED FUTURE OVERHAULCOSTS BY THE MODEL Total Predicted Overhaul Costs $0 $1,000,000 $2,000,000 $3,000,000 $4,000,000 $5,000,000 $6,000,000 $7,000,000 $8,000,000 $9,000,000 $10,000,000 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Year Costin2008dollars
  • 21.