GUIDELINES FOR PREPARATION OF THE ASSESSMENT ONE
CRITICAL ANALYSIS REPORT
OVERVIEW
A critical analysis report is a thorough review of a written work and a personal reaction or
reflection to this analysis. Experience in making critiques of written works is required for the
following reasons:
1. Extensive critical reading helps achieve a more comprehensive understanding of the
concepts included in the course.
2. Critical analysis and evaluation of literary work assists with the comprehension of
content of a particular course of interest or concern
3. The written critique helps develop the art of effective communication
4. The analysis helps develop appropriate reference citations for professional opinions
on health care issues
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
Each student is required review two (2) articles from professional health related journals. The
articles must focus on related, relevant and current aspect of Healthcare Finance or Economics.
The articles must be published within last 2 years. The two (2) articles are to be selected from
separate healthcare finance/planning topics. There is no specific topic that is required.
GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSMENT
Overview
Provide an overview of why you selected the topic of the articles and how they connect
with your interests or professional career. In the overview note the following for each
article:
1. Applicable General Topic:
2. Title of Article:
3. Authors Name:
4. Name of Journal:
5. Date of Journal:
6. Volume:
7. Number:
8. Pages (on which article appears):
9. Publisher of Journal
Cite using APA formatting. http://www.apastyle.org/manual/index.aspx. A copy of the
articles must be submitted with the written report
http://www.apastyle.org/manual/index.aspx
Assessment One Guidelines (UNIT 7) 2
Synopsis and Summary
Concise overview of the articles’ basic content.
Content and Analysis
1. A brief statement about what you felt was the author’s general theme of the article.
2. A brief statement about what you felt concerning the author’s point of view. Include
whether the presentation was factual or subjective and lacking of facts. Explain your
opinion.
3. Provide a list of the issues or challenges presented in the articles.
Conclusions, Recommendations, and Discussion
1. List of author’s conclusions and/or recommendations.
2. Based on the author’s conclusions and/or recommendations, do you agree or
disagree; provide a brief justification regarding your opinion concerning your
agreements and disagreements.
Professional Projections
1. A statement on what you learned from the article and how you may apply this
experience (negative or positive) in your professional future career.
ASSESSMENT FORMAT AND GRADING
All reports should be cleanly typed in MS Word. The paper is to be clear and concise; does not
contain errors in spelling, punctuation, or syntax. In typing, the following should be observed.
• Include a.
GUIDELINES FOR PREPARATION OF THE ASSESSMENT ONE CRITICAL AN.docx
1. GUIDELINES FOR PREPARATION OF THE ASSESSMENT
ONE
CRITICAL ANALYSIS REPORT
OVERVIEW
A critical analysis report is a thorough review of a written work
and a personal reaction or
reflection to this analysis. Experience in making critiques of
written works is required for the
following reasons:
1. Extensive critical reading helps achieve a more
comprehensive understanding of the
concepts included in the course.
2. Critical analysis and evaluation of literary work assists with
the comprehension of
content of a particular course of interest or concern
3. The written critique helps develop the art of effective
communication
4. The analysis helps develop appropriate reference citations for
professional opinions
on health care issues
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
2. Each student is required review two (2) articles from
professional health related journals. The
articles must focus on related, relevant and current aspect of
Healthcare Finance or Economics.
The articles must be published within last 2 years. The two (2)
articles are to be selected from
separate healthcare finance/planning topics. There is no
specific topic that is required.
GUIDELINES FOR ASSESSMENT
Overview
Provide an overview of why you selected the topic of the
articles and how they connect
with your interests or professional career. In the overview note
the following for each
article:
1. Applicable General Topic:
2. Title of Article:
3. Authors Name:
4. Name of Journal:
5. Date of Journal:
6. Volume:
7. Number:
8. Pages (on which article appears):
9. Publisher of Journal
Cite using APA formatting.
http://www.apastyle.org/manual/index.aspx. A copy of the
articles must be submitted with the written report
3. http://www.apastyle.org/manual/index.aspx
Assessment One Guidelines (UNIT 7) 2
Synopsis and Summary
Concise overview of the articles’ basic content.
Content and Analysis
1. A brief statement about what you felt was the author’s
general theme of the article.
2. A brief statement about what you felt concerning the author’s
point of view. Include
whether the presentation was factual or subjective and lacking
of facts. Explain your
opinion.
3. Provide a list of the issues or challenges presented in the
articles.
Conclusions, Recommendations, and Discussion
1. List of author’s conclusions and/or recommendations.
2. Based on the author’s conclusions and/or recommendations,
do you agree or
disagree; provide a brief justification regarding your opinion
concerning your
agreements and disagreements.
Professional Projections
1. A statement on what you learned from the article and how
you may apply this
experience (negative or positive) in your professional future
4. career.
ASSESSMENT FORMAT AND GRADING
All reports should be cleanly typed in MS Word. The paper is
to be clear and concise; does not
contain errors in spelling, punctuation, or syntax. In typing, the
following should be observed.
• Include a cover page with your name and title of the
assignment
• Follow the format as noted above with the same sections
• The use of Excel files, charts, graphs, or other graphic
displays must be entered into the
Word File inside a text box.
• Double space and leave 1 ¼” to 1 ½” margins on both sides
and on the top and bottom
of each page
• Number all pages and use a table of contents
• Length of Report – there is no minimum number of pages,
submit a well-organized and
thoroughly-developed report
• Submit one final Word File for grading. Name the file with
your last name, first initial,
and assessment 1 (Adams_J_ASSMT1).
• Follow the Assessment Rubric for grading.
Unit 1 Assignment
Learn about the studies
The American Psychological Association (APA) has a
5. Code of Conduct that describes rules concerning ethics
in psychological experiments, and review boards are in place to
enforce these ethics. But in the past, the standards were not so
strict, which is how some very famous studies in psychology
came about.
Read about (and watch) the following psychological studies that
would, today, be considered unethical.
The Milgram Experiment
Yale psychologist Stanley Milgram hoped to further understand
how so many people came to participate in the cruel acts of the
Holocaust. He theorized that people are generally inclined to
obey authority figures, posing the question, "Could it be that
Eichmann and his million accomplices in the Holocaust were
just following orders? Could we call them all accomplices?" In
1961, he began to conduct experiments of obedience.
Watch the following video:
Obedience to Authority (12m:46s)
The Little Albert Experiment
At Johns Hopkins University in 1920, John Watson conducted a
study of classical conditioning on a 9-month-old baby he called
Albert B. The young boy started the experiment loving animals,
particularly a white rat, but when Watson started pairing the
presence of the rat with the loud sound of a hammer hitting
metal, Albert began to develop a fear of the white rat as well as
most animals and furry objects.
Watch the following video:
Little Albert (3m:26s)
The Blue Eyes and Brown Eyes Experiment
Jane Elliott was not a psychologist, but she developed a
controversial exercise in 1968 by dividing students into a blue-
eyed group and a brown-eyed group in an attempt to give her
students hands-on experience with discrimination.
Watch the following video:
6. A Class Divided (53m:05s)
Select a study
Once you have watched and learned about each experiment,
choose one experiment to study in more depth. Conduct research
online to learn more about that experiment, and then complete
the assignment.
Choose ONE of the experiments above and construct a 2-page
paper based on the following:
· 1st Paragraph: Clearly
state the main problem or issue you need to consider
when determining whether or not this study is ethical. Clearly
explain what makes this study unethical and why. Cite
at least one outside source, as well as one or two concepts from
the APA Code of Conduct, to support your statements.
· 2nd Paragraph:
Analyze and interpret relevant information about this
study to determine what would need to be changed in order to
meet the APA's Code of Conduct and ethical standards.
· 3rd Paragraph:
Evaluate this study to assess if the benefit of learning
the results of this study outweighs the potential harm of
conducting the study. Cite at least one outside source to support
your statements.
· 4th Paragraph: Generate a comprehensive
conclusion that integrates your thoughts about this
study and about ethical experiments (the main problem/issue
you addressed in the first paragraph).
Make sure that you cite your sources within your paper using
APA-formatted, in-text citations, and the last page of your
paper needs to be your APA-formatted reference page. Both
your first paragraph and third paragraph must have citations.