random sample is selected from a population with u = 80 and o = 20. .pdf

•

0 likes•5 views

random sample is selected from a population with u = 80 and o = 20. Which of the following samples would have an expected value of M equal to 80? Answer \\ A sample of n = 4 scores. A sample of n = 16 scores. A sample of n = 64 scores. All of the samples would have an expected value of 80. . Solution All of the samples would have an expected value of 80 because E(Xbar)==80.

Education

More from sales113

Read the article \" Security Controls that Work\" by Dwayne Melancon below write a report that answers the following questions. 4. What metrics can an IT auditor use to assess how an organization is performing in terms of change controls and change management? Why are those metrics particularly useful? Security Controls That Work By Dwayne Melançon, CISA Ask the average IT or security manager what measures his/her organization takes to secure its networks, systems, applications and data, and the answer will most likely involve a combination of traditional perimeter protection solutions (such as firewalls, intrusion detection, antivirus and antispyware) together with patch management, business continuance strategies, and access control methods and policies. All of these measures make sense at first glance, yet the deluge of intrusions, data thefts, worms and other attacks continues unabated, with organizations losing productivity, revenue and customers every year. There are many reasons for this gap in controls and effectiveness. Access controls can be taken only so far before they run into legitimate resistance from employees who find their productivity hampered by the very controls designed to protect it. Traditional perimeter protection and access control are not as effective at blocking attacks from inside organizations as they are at blocking external hackers, which says a lot, since the latter manage to breach thousands of company networks every year. And, as the number and frequency of zero-day attacks continue to grow, the effectiveness of patch management and traditional signature-based intrusion detection, antivirus and antispyware solutions is increasingly in doubt. All of this begs a host of questions: How is it possible to determine whether an organization’s security controls actually work? Of all the hundreds of practices and objectives within Control Objectives for Information and related Technology (COBIT), IT Infrastructure Library (ITIL) and the other frameworks an organization may implement, which ones are truly the most effective at helping the organization block and respond to attacks—and which ones merely sound good but do not accomplish all that much in practice? Why are some organizations vastly better than others at preventing and responding to attacks? On which controls should auditors focus to verify that the infrastructure is genuinely protected? Come budget approval time, where should the company concentrate its security money, and how can it be demonstrated to senior management that those proposed investments will actually do the job? These are the types of questions the IT Process Institute (ITPI) set out to answer when it was founded in 2000. One of the results of ITPI’s work, the “IT Controls Performance Benchmark Study,”1 proves with empirical evidence that not only are some organizations vastly better than the rest of the pack at preventing and responding to attacks, but also that the difference between these.

Read the article Security Controls that Work by Dwayne Melancon.pdf

random sample is selected from a population with u = 80 and o = 20. .pdf

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from sales113

More from sales113 (15)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

random sample is selected from a population with u = 80 and o = 20. .pdf