Sub:
Emerging Threats and Countermeasures
For this assignment, review the article:Abomhara, M., & Koien, G.M. (2015). Cyber security and the internet of things: Vulnerabilities, threats, intruders, and attacks.
Journal of Cyber Security, 4
, 65-88. Doi: 10.13052/jcsm2245-1439.414 and evaluate it in 3 pages (750 words), using your own words, by addressing the following:
What did the authors investigate, and in general how did they do so?
Identify the hypothesis or question being tested
Summarize the overall article.
Identify the conclusions of the authors
Indicate whether or not you think the data support their conclusions/hypothesis
Consider alternative explanations for the results
Provide any additional comments pertaining to other approaches to testing their hypothesis (logical follow-up studies to build on, confirm or refute the conclusions)
The relevance or importance of the study
The appropriateness of the experimental design
When you write your evaluation, be brief and concise, this is not meant to be an essay but an objective evaluation that one can read very easily and quickly. Also, you should include a complete reference (title, authors, journal, issue, pages) you turn in your evaluation. APA-7 guidelines to be followed.
...
Sub Emerging Threats and CountermeasuresFor this assignment, .docx
1. Sub:
Emerging Threats and Countermeasures
For this assignment, review the article:Abomhara, M., & Koien,
G.M. (2015). Cyber security and the internet of things:
Vulnerabilities, threats, intruders, and attacks.
Journal of Cyber Security, 4
, 65-88. Doi: 10.13052/jcsm2245-1439.414 and evaluate it in 3
pages (750 words), using your own words, by addressing the
following:
What did the authors investigate, and in general how did they
do so?
Identify the hypothesis or question being tested
Summarize the overall article.
Identify the conclusions of the authors
Indicate whether or not you think the data support their
conclusions/hypothesis
Consider alternative explanations for the results
Provide any additional comments pertaining to other approaches
to testing their hypothesis (logical follow-up studies to build
on, confirm or refute the conclusions)
The relevance or importance of the study
The appropriateness of the experimental design
2. When you write your evaluation, be brief and concise, this is
not meant to be an essay but an objective evaluation that one
can read very easily and quickly. Also, you should include a
complete reference (title, authors, journal, issue, pages) you
turn in your evaluation. APA-7 guidelines to be followed.
