In his presentation to a Williams Foundation Seminar on August 10, 2016, the Commander of the Australian Navy looked at the challenges and the way ahead for the Australian Navy.
The Williams Foundation has held a seminar on new approaches to air-sea integration on August 10, 2016 in Canberra, Australia.
The Royal Australian Navy has had the ability to network and share situational awareness amongst the fleet for many years and the P-3s has been the only RAAF platform capable of being part of that network. The RAAF’s journey of networking its capability journey started more recently with the Hornet Upgrade Program and has accelerated with the introduction of capabilities like Wedgetail and Vigilaire. All of the RAAF’s fleet is now capable of linking into and contributing to an Air Layer of the Joint Battle management system.
With the advent of 5th Generation capabilities like the JSF and the new combat systems on the AWD as well as the design and development of the new combat systems for the Australia’s future frigates, Offshore Patrol vessels and Submarines, the ADF has a unique opportunity to influence and design in an unprecedented level of integration into the RAN’s and RAAF’s new platforms. That unprecedented level of integration should drive new thinking on the integration of air and sea power effects. The seminar is about examining the challenges and possibilities of the combat power in that future integrated force.
Air Force and Navy need to not only remediate existing deficiencies but take advantage of the transformative nature of fifth generation technology. The seminar aims to explore the art of the possible in future Air-Sea operations.
http://www.williamsfoundation.org.au/event-2230289
Call Girls Service Connaught Place @9999965857 Delhi 🫦 No Advance VVIP 🍎 SER...
Rear Admiral Mayer Looks at the Evolution of the Australian Navy
1. Force Generation of the ADF Air-Sea
Capability
Rear Admiral Stuart Mayer
Commander Australian Fleet
2. SCOPE
• Navy’s Warfighting Direction
• Force Generating Joint Capabilities
- Challenges
- Options and Choices
• Generating the Air-Sea Capability
• Future Work
3. Navy’s Warfighting Direction
• Maintaining our Guiding Priorities
- People, Sea/Airworthiness and Warfighting
• Meet our Commitments
- Enduring
- Emerging
• The Cathedral – NS 18 Pelorus
- Developing the Plans – Navy Warfighting Strategy 18.
• NWS Phase 1 Objective ‘Stabilise’
- Core Unit Skills, OPQUALS and Individual Training
- Experiment on concepts for TG Warfare
- Identify gaps and areas for focus
• NWS Phase 2 Objective ‘Consolidate’
- Implement Ocean Series focus on Joint Sea Combat
- Establish enabling elements tested in Phase 1 (IW, SCC and
MOC Staff etc)
- Coordination within Joint Collective Training construct
4. Why Joint Sea Combat
• CDF has clearly established his policy on Joint Collective Training and
Certification in CDF Directive. CJOPS is tasked with certifying and
employing this ‘Joint Force’.
• The Joint Force is based around concepts defined within the Joint
Capability and Concepts Division and administered through JWC.
• JWC has advanced concepts where clear Joint equities and shared
interests lie. (Amphibious, Joint Fires)
• Service domain concepts have not been resourced within the Joint
Framework.
• Service domain concepts are at risk of being squeezed out unless
they integrate, coordinate and optimise constrained resource.
• The Joint approach reflects reality, is consistent with policy, and
‘resonates’ with how we approach complex warfighting tasks.
5. Why Joint Sea Combat –
Learning from the Amphibious Example
• ADF learned significant lessons from operations in
Timor Leste in 1999 and 2006.
• Pre-eminent amongst lessons was that amphibious
warfare needed to move from platform to a system
centric view.
• The Amphibious Deployment and Sustainment
System (ADAS) and Australian Amphibious Force
(AAF) was advanced.
• The AAF considers all elements of the amphibious
force and includes a Joint Force approach to Force
Generation.
• Capability places CN as lead CM, DJFHQ leads the
CRP, concept is sponsored by FD Branch managed by
a Joint CIT, overseen by JAC and reported to COSC.
• Operationally DJFHQ coordinates the FORGEN cycle
of AAF and CJOPS directs its training and
employment.
6.
7. Why Joint Sea Combat
• FPR highlights the need for a single unifying concept and exercising
framework that meets CDF and CJOPS need.
• The Sea Series is broadly accepted, incorporated within the PADFA
and provides a working model.
• Army has developed the Joint Land Combat (Land Series/Hamel)
• Navy has built Joint Sea Combat (Ocean Series) and leveraged Sea
Series to include littoral warfare threats.
• Air Force supports SEA, LAND and OCEAN Series but there is no
comparable Joint Air Warfare activity (JAW is subsumed).
• Service FORGEN Headquarters are ‘subcontracting’ the concept
development, FORGEN and certification of joint physical domains on
behalf of Joint and it is working.
• Three environmental headquarters have worked to develop a
coordinated approach to Force Generation that is resourced and
sustainable.
8.
9. FST-J
ATG Deployment
Generic Maritime Force
Generation Cycle 2018 +
Even Years
Ocean
Explorer
Feb AugMay Jun JulAprMar Oct DecNovJan Sep
LHD 1
LHD 2
LSD 1
MCC
ATG
PLF
EF 1
EF 2
Sea
Horizon
Vital
Prospect
Navy Led Joint Theatre Led Joint Operational Led Army Led
Sea
Explorer
Sea
Raider
Ocean
Master
ATG Deployment
Theatre Reserve Band 1 Tasks
ATG DeploymentOcean Series and TG FIT
Sea Series – ARE/U Certification
Sea Series – ARE/U Certification
Sea Series – ARE/U Certification
Sea Series – ARE/U Certification
Vital Series
RIMPAC Theatre Reserve Band 1 Tasks
ATG Deployment
ATG Deployment
ATG Deployment
ATG Deployment
ATG Deployment
TG FIT
SAG 1
SAG 2
Ocean Series TG FIT
Ocean Series
ATG Deployment
Sea Series- Littoral TG FIT ATG DeploymentFSTJ
RIMPAC KAKADU
Ocean Master
Ocean Raider
Ocean Raider
Ocean Raider
Ocean Raider
Ocean Raider
Ocean Raider
Kakadu
Kakadu
RIMPAC
Ocean Series
Ocean Series
Ocean Series
FTX
STX
CPX
Ocean
Horizon FST-J
FSTJ
TG FIT
TG FIT
Southern
Katipo
Katipo
Ocean Master
Ocean Master
10. FST-J
ATG Deployment
Generic Maritime Force
Generation Cycle 2018 +
Odd Years
Ocean
Explorer
Feb AugMay Jun JulAprMar Oct DecNovJan Sep
LHD 1
LHD 2
LSD 1
MCC
ATG
PLF
EF 3
EF 2
Sea
Horizon
Navy Led Joint Theatre Led Joint Operational Led Army Led
Sea
Explorer
Sea
Raider
Ocean
Master
ATG Deployment
Theatre Reserve Band 1 Tasks
ATG DeploymentOcean Series and TG FIT
Sea Series – ARE/U Certification
Sea Series – ARE/U Certification
Sea Series – ARE/U Certification
Sea Series – ARE/U Certification
Theatre Reserve Band 1 Tasks
ATG Deployment
ATG Deployment
ATG Deployment
ATG Deployment
TG FIT
SAG 1
SAG 2
Ocean Series TG FIT
Ocean Series
ATG Deployment
Sea Series- Littoral
TG FIT ATG Deployment
FSTJ
Talisman Sabre
Ocean Raider
Ocean Raider
Ocean Raider
Ocean Raider
Ocean Raider
Ocean Raider
Ocean Raider
Ocean Series
Ocean Series
Ocean Series
FTX
STX
CPX
Ocean
Horizon FST-J
Talisman Sabre
Talisman Sabre
Talisman Sabre
Talisman Sabre
Talisman Sabre
Talisman Sabre
Talisman Sabre
Talisman Sabre
Talisman Sabre
ATG Deployment
FSTJ
Ex
Hamel
Talisman Sabre
Talisman Sabre
Render Safe
Render Safe
11. Joint Air Warfare
• Joint Air Warfare is conducted within the
construct of existing FORGEN activities.
• Joint Fires (and by association networks
and battlespace) is being championed
within Force Development Branch
• Ships routinely sail in JADIP categories
and are active within the network.
• Navy’s Air Warfare Officers are
principally drawn from FC branch who
are trained at RAAF WLM (E7 or FFCE)
• E7 Sim routinely dials into Navy STX
activities in joint and combined context.
(More complex than live)
• Air Force and Navy routinely collaborate
through AMWC and AWC, coordinate
Jericho with Nike (MWP) and co chair
Maritime Warfare Steering Group.
The Good
12. Joint Air Warfare
• Joint Air Warfare is not generated as a Joint
System.
• The Joint Air Warfare System (Training,
Doctrine, TTPs, Network and Platforms) is
not certified.
• Joint Fires (and by association networks and
battlespace) is being developed but is only
certified in part.
• The JAWC established by Air Force is in
abeyance and is only partially subsumed
within JWC.
• There is no deliberate mechanism to identify
and then rectify deficiencies in the JAWS.
• There are few exercises that test ADF JAWS in
the maritime domain. Those that do have
identified shortcomings in TTPs.
• The ADF JAWS is becoming more complex
and will require attention.
The Not So
Yet Good
13. Conclusion
• As Navy increasingly focuses on TG/Force level operations
and fields 5th generation capabilities from the IIP, increased
overlap between Air and Sea will be evident.
• The Force Generation of the Air-Sea Capability is presently
complicated by a lack of a Joint System approach.
• Significant goodwill is evident at working level to integrate
Navy/Air Force approaches to JAWS, and grass roots
initiatives are valued.
• The emerging FORGEN calendar provides an opportunity to
incorporate JAWS goals in existing collective training events,
or create a bespoke activity.
• The current approach to JAWS is relatively immature (when
compared to ADAS or JASW) but is ripe for development.