Same Sex Marriage Persuasive Essay

Persuasive Essay On Same Sex Marriage
On May 18, 1970, Jack Baker and Michael McConnell walked into a courthouse in Minneapolis,
paid $10, and applied for a marriage license. The county clerk Gerald Nelson refused to give them
one because marriage was for couples that were opposite sex. Baker and McConnell did not give
up, Baker quit his engineering job to attend law school at the University of Minnesota. He spent
hours in the library researching Minnesota's marriage statute word for word. He discovered a
loophole that It did not state that two people of the same sex couldn't get married. Baker thought
that the best alternative to legal marriage would be to get some of the benefits of marriage, which
would be adoption. Because Minnesota law did not forbid an adult to adopt another adult,
McConnell was able to legally adopt Baker. That allowed Baker to change his last name to
McConnell and his first name to one that was gender neutral like Pat Lynn. The couple attempted
to apply for a marriage license again, this time in Blue Earth County, using Baker's new name
McConnell. When he handed the paperwork to the clerk, she noticed the name "Pat Lynn
McConnell" and Michael McConnell" on the application. She didn't really seem to care. The office
issued the marriage license without a problem. With their license approved, they quickly planned
their wedding ceremony in September 1971. Today things have changed about same sex marriage
on Friday June 26, 2015 the Supreme Court of the United States made same sex marriage
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Persuasive Essay: Same Sex Marriage
The United States of America; the very first thought to come to mind should be a nation of peace
and equality. But in the big picture, it's not. We are living in a nation filled with racism, sexism, hate,
and homophobia. There are 39 U.S. states that have banned same–sex marriage, 5 that allow civil
unions between same sex couples, and 6 that allow same–sex marriage, along with DC. However,
due to DOMA (Defense of Marriage Act), the federal government does not recognize same–sex
marriage in these states. According to the 2010 Census, there were 646,000 same–sex couple
households, and 115,064 of those couples have children. Same–sex marriage (also called gay
marriage) is a legally or socially recognized marriage between two persons of the...show more
content...
According to a report issued by the Census Bureau, 18.2% of married women aged 15 to 44 are
childless (Bachu, 4). Are we to tell these people that their marriages are not truly valid because they
have no children, whether by choice or physical limitations? Should these marriages be legally
nullified? Should we start questioning all who want to marry of their intent to bear children? Most
would respond to these questions in the negative, because that would be an unacceptable intrusion
by the state into their privacy as individuals. If no one has ever thought to ask heterosexual couples
whether or not they plan to have children and carry out this specific "purpose" of marriage, it should
not be a consideration that inhibits the ability of same–sex couples from entering into the institution
of marriage. Many proponents of same–sex marriage, especially those within the gay community,
argue that they should be allowed access to the institution of marriage in order to have the rights and
benefits of a married couple. Without these rights, same–sex couples face many hardships that
straight married couples do not have, or benefits they take for granted. For example, a same–sex
couple would have difficulties with visitation rights if one of them were to become hospitalized. Or,
if one person owned the house the couple lived in and that person died, the other would have no
right to the house and would most likely have

In America there are many expectations as to who people should be and how marriage is
supposed to work. From the beginning, marriage between a man and woman has been considered
the bedrock of society. Dating back to the 1970s; same sex marriage has been a major issue. In an
article on MPR News written by Sasha Aslanian, she states, "On May 18th, 1970, two Minneapolis
men made a shocking request. They applied for a marriage license... At the time, Minnesota's
marriage laws didn't mention gender, but Hennepin County rejected their request" (1). This topic is
an issue in marriages and families all across the world today because more and more same–sex
couples are choosing to marry. As society has evolved, the meaning of marriage has changed...show
more content...
Also in an article written on The Guardian, the author states, "The current indifference between
marriage and civil partnerships does not involve injustice, but the proposed changes arguably would,
by creating two new varieties of marriage" (Sentamu 3). If everyone agreed that same–sex marriage
was okay, then there would not be two varieties of marriage. It is either you are married or you are
not. People cannot compare same–sex couples deciding to marry to bestiality because they are
human just like everyone else. All citizens should be able to enjoy full human rights, no matter their
sexuality. In Same–Sex marriage in the United States: Focus on the Facts, the author states, "Partners
without legal family ties are routinely prevented from visiting their loved ones in hospitals" (Cahill).
Not allowing same–sex couples to marry takes away very important potential benefits they could
have if allowed to marry. Some health care related rights are available exclusively to married
couples. These rights include: visitation rights, the right to make funeral arrangements, and access to
Health Care rights, they also get unequal tax treatment for being the same sex. Only married spouses
can transfer an unlimited amount of money without taxes being taken out. Opposite sex couples can
enjoy tax free health insurance. Same–Sex couples do not qualify as dependents so they are not

Marriage? What is it? What does it consist of? Marriage is when two people make their
relationship public, official and permanent (Psychology Today). When two people have
committed themselves to each other to live together through the harsh and glorious times. Theses
harsh and glorious times makes the couple overcome these obstacles and makes the people in the
marriage develop. The traditional marriage consists of man and woman. The man and woman
would have house and they have two children and a pet. Along with children and pet the man
would go to work and the wife would stay at home to take care of the house. This was the reality
that occur in the 20th century. That reality that had occur in the 20th century is no longer
instance. Instead the ideal household is more diverse in today in day. It could consist of a single
mother, or just two friends living together. There is no specific household. With the household
being amended marriages are influence by it. Just like the household has change, marriages now a
day can consist of a man and man or a woman and woman or much more. Same sex marriage has
been becoming more accepting in countries and all around the world. Regardless of what gender
the two partners are people should be allowed to love who they love and be with they want to be
with.
Although people should be allow to love who they love it has created a problem in some countries
and parts of the world. Churches, and many Eastern countries have repudiated same sex couples by
not giving the same rights and/or benefits just like heterosexual couples. Deciding if homosexual
couples should be recognized just like heterosexual couples is a major concern. With the major
concern of granting homosexual couples right have cleave people into groups. The pro and the con
are the two major groups that have emerge in respond to the conundrum. The con side to same–sex
marriage, which opposes it and does not support, that it damages the institution of marriage
(Marriage). The reason the institution of marriage is destroy because the traditional and accepted
marriage is between a man and a woman which is not the case with same sex marriage. In addition
to the institution of marriage being destroy the con side claims

"251,695 –Same–sex married couples in the United States in 2013, according to the Census
Bureau's American Community Survey." Amy Roberts and Catelyn Stark, from CNN write. In
the United States today, same sex marriage is legal in all states. Unfortunately, that is not the case
everywhere in the world. In some places, people are forced to marry a certain gender. In these
places, if someone disobeyed this law, there are cruel punishments that are given. Same sex
marriage being illegal is a major issue and people must spread the word, go to rallies or parades, and
report any crimes they witness in order to legalize it everywhere. The beginning of the fight for not
only same sex marriage being legal, but also having equal treatment for those who are gay began in
1924. "1924 – The Society for Human Rights is founded by Henry Gerber in Chicago. It is the first
documented gay rights organization." (LGBT Rights Milestones Fast Facts) The article explains
the fight for gay rights throughout the years. The Society for Human Rights was just the
beginning. As people who were gay saw this organization, they felt more confident to be more
open with who they were. Although, it also caused many people to become resentful against
people who were gay. The Society for Human Right sparked many more organizations and events
to come. In addition, in the 1950s, being gay was considered a crime in most of the United States.
This was a huge deal and was taking over the news. "Newspaper headlines

Same–sex marriage is one of the biggest social issues in American society and the adoption of
children by same–sex couples is a sensitive issue, which is much debatable throughout the
nationwide. Same–sex marriage has been legalized since 2015, showing that many are less likely to
condemn homosexual relationships now than in the past. Since adopting children is considered a
legitimate family function of a marriage couple, the rights of adopted children should be extended to
same–sex couples.
My definition of marriage is a male and a female falling in love, living together, having their babies
and raising their children. My understanding of marriage came from a culture, family, school, and
community. Everyone has their own different perspectives that most likely have been derived from
individual's anthropological background. Thus, Americans may have various perspectives of married
homosexual families and same–sex marriage. However, everyone is different and people should learn
how to accept their differences because it is important in social life to understand and acknowledge
different viewpoints to avoid further complications and conflicts. Same–sex couples are considered
as different in social norm, but that does not mean that they are wrong.
There are some debates on the issue of permitting same–sex couples to adopt children. American
society is not ready to accept and understand the adoption of children to same–sex marriage couples.
There is a general perception of

Same–sex marriage, exists when two people of the same gender are wed in matrimony. They can
be wed in a civil ceremony or in a religious ceremony in most states in the United States. Public
support for same–sex marriage has grown rapidly over the past decades. In 2007, 54 percent of
surveyed Americans while 37 percent said they were OK with it.. With the engagement from all U.S.
government branches same–sex marriages is a legal right across the United States; the Judicial branch
legalized the right to same–sex marriage, the legislative has introduced bills on the issue, and the
executive signed the legislation into law. In the Judicial branch, the Supreme Court made a major
change to the idea of marriage in America, and gave the right to same–sex couples. The Supreme
Court stated that the claim that "marriage" and "spouse" applied only to heterosexual couples was
unconditional. In the U.S. v. Winsor case, the court struck down a previous ruling and said that all
couples have the same federal benefits as heterosexual couples. The court shot down the section 3
DOMA and made it unconditional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. There is
now a constitutional right for people of the same sex to get married in the United States. Intimate
associations is enjoyed by both same–sex couples as well as opposite sex couples
The Legislative branch proposed various bills so that same–sex marriage could be proposed.
Congress issued an act called the respect of

As the society changing, the history of marriage also changes. Marriage is legally recognized
union of two people as partners in a personal relationship, but do those two partners always have to
be a man and a woman? Most people believe that homosexuals should be granted equal rights as
heterosexual couples. Being as an important social issue, same–sex marriage has become a hot topic
of public debates in the recent years. For over the past decade, public support for the same–sex
marriage has quickly risen. The United States is one of over twenty countries that allow gay and
lesbian couples to wed. I believe that same–sex marriage should be legalized in all countries for
several reasons, such as being an issue of equal rights, separation of church and state, no negative
effect on the heterosexual communities, increasing in child adoption, and decreasing divorce and
suicide rates.
First, it can clearly be seen that same–sex marriage is primarily about equality. Everyone has equal
rights and liberties to chase happiness, as long as it does not cause harm to the society, so why
should their freedoms be limits? Why can't someone be able to marry a person they truly love?
Discrimination and banning homosexual couples to get married violates human rights and freedoms.
Laws which against gay marriage deny the First Amendment which states that everyone has freedom
of speech, expression and religion. Sexual determination is an option, so it is how some people can
express themselves.

In June of 2015, the Supreme Court ruled same–sex marriage legal in the United States. "No union is
more profound than marriage, for it embodies the highest ideals of love, fidelity, devotion, sacrifice,
and family" Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote for majority (Gorman, M. 2015, June 26). When the
justice system was split on deciding, Kennedy was the deciding vote for the controversial matter.
However, there are thirteen remaining states in the U.S. which have made constitutional or statutory
provisions prohibiting same–sex marriage: with many states impelling the decision should be up to
each state rather than the federal government. According to the Pew Research Center, 2015 was
record high for supporters of gay marriage: with fifty–seven percent supporting the affair and
thirty–nine percent opposing. Marriage is a moral and legal entitlement to any citizen, since
marriage is a civil right, brings financial gain to federal, state, and local governments, and bestows
worldwide unity: even for same–sex couples. Civil rights are a class of rights which protect
individuals' freedom from infringement by governments, social organizations, and private
individuals. A few examples of civil rights are freedom of speech, press, and assembly; the right to
vote, freedom from involuntary servitude, and the right to equality in public places. Marriage is a
universally civil institution, as evidenced by the paperwork that those getting married must all
submit to the same place. (Frye, pg.

Gay Marriage Research Paper
Controversies, like equal rights for LGBTQ, are being debated and resolved as the world
advances. Same sex marriage is an important topic in America and continues to mold the United
States. Now that the LGBTQ have the same civil rights as a straight man or woman, different
groups have already begun to express their opinions and ideas concerning same sex marriage.
Also, people of different ages and races in general are feeding off the views of others to
determine for themselves if same sex couples should have the right to marry. Often, same sex
couples are faced with discrimination and hate from people who do not share the same beliefs;
however, regardless of what rivals say, same sex couples still proudly support homosexual
marriage. In her article about a lesbian couple who were finally able to marry after many months
awaiting legalization, Liz Hayes writes, "Abramovich and Brookover said they realize some people
have objections to same–sex couples' being afforded equal rights. 'We don't go around flaunting it
in front of everyone; we weren't being like, 'We're here, and we're going to be gay whether you
like it or not,'" (Hayes). LGBTQ couples do support same sex marriage and they believe marriage
to be a civil right, which should be granted to all citizens. Homosexual individuals are supported all
over the world, but perhaps their most influential support comes from the people closest to them
like friends and family. However, the people closest to a gay or lesbian can

The struggle for equality in our nation is nothing new. One of the biggest struggles was same sex
marriage. the discussion around same–sex marriage initially started in 1993 when the Hawaii
Supreme Court decided that laws denying same–sex couples the privilege to wed damaged state
established equivalent assurance rights unless the state could demonstrate a "convincing reason" for
such separation. Since that time, some states have controlled and stated that marriage can only
happen among a woman and a man and other states have allowed same sex couples to marry.
Interest groups are groups of people that come together to share their similar goals and opinions.
They play a big part in the government representing controversial issues. An interest group that
was a huge help and was rooting for the same sex marriage was the "Freedom to Marry Coalition".
They worked hard to get the public informed, and they got them to participate in their favor. They
wrote petitions for citizens to sign to get people to influence the government. They signed a pledge
to allow same sex marriage in the South. They worked to overturn the Defense of Marriage Act
(DOMA). This act was established in 1996, and even after fighting for it for eighteen years there's
only so much an interest group can do. Under government law, particularly the Defense of Marriage
Act marked into law by President Bill Clinton in 1996, marriage is characterized as between one
man and one lady. However, state–by–state laws in

Persuasive Essay About Same-Sex Marriage
America was founded in part as a way for Christians to flee tyranny in Europe. Christians wanted to
be able to have freedom to worship as they chose. This desire to worship freely has remained a
crucial part of what makes our nation great.
Even President Obama, whom many would say isn't very religious himself shared this quote, "This
is America. And our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakeable."
Admittedly, the former President was speaking about a controversial Islamic center when he made
this statement and not the religious freedoms enjoyed by today's pastors or Christians in general.
However, the point he was making is one that is worth noting. America and religious freedom go
hand–in–hand, from the country's founding, until today and hopefully, forevermore. Unfortunately,
this isn't the case in every country or in Sweden more specifically, and that fact has many religious
people more than a little concerned.
Swedish Ministers Forced to Marry Same–Sex Couples:
A recent announcement by the Swedish government has many ministers concerned. According to a
Christian Institute report, Swedish Prime Minister Stefan Lofven recently declared that all ministers
serving in the Church of Sweden should be required to perform marriage ceremonies for same–sex
couples, even if they personal disagree with gay marriage or have a negative opinion on
homosexuality.
The following is an exact quote from Lofven:
"No priest in the Swedish Church can refuse to marry same–sex

Same–sex marriages, which are also referred to as gay marriages, are legal unions between persons
that really have the same gender identity or biological sex (Lahey & Alderson, 2010). The American
society essentially is divided regarding their opinion on same–sex marriages, or so they basically
thought. A case in point kind of is the divergent reactions during the pretty last presidential campaign
when the incumbent president revealed that he supported gay marriage, which particularly is
significant. Same–sex marriages are widely accepted today when compared to sort of several years
ago. It specifically has even been legalized in some states in a very major way. However, as much as
people have literally become more tolerant towards same–sex marriages not everyone particularly
treats same–sex marriages as normal in a subtle way. Everybody basically has their generally own
beliefs and opinions about same–sex marriages, which mostly is quite significant.
Firstly, same–sex marriages are legal in all 50 states in the United States. Colorado was the latest
state to literally legalize same–sex marriages. However, particularly heterosexual relationships are
legal in all the fifty states in USA (Lahey & Alderson, 2010). Similarly, heterosexual marriages
specifically are allowed in all countries in a particularly major way. However, only twelve countries
have legalized same–sex marriages nationwide; Belgium, Argentina, Denmark, Canada, the
Netherlands, Iceland, Norway, Spain,

Same–sex marriages should be recognized as legal marriages and should be given the same legal
status, rights and protections that are given to traditional marriages between a man and a woman. In
the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court case, Goodridge v. Department of Public Health, the
Court held that "there is no reasonable relationship between a ban [on gay marriage] and the
protection of public health, safety, or public welfare." A ban on gay marriage is "impermissibly
based on private prejudice against homosexuals." In addition, a ban against same–sex marriage
discriminates on the basis of sexual orientation. I wholeheartedly agree with what the Court held in
this case.
In Perry v. Schwarzenegger, the District Court held that the provision in the California Constitution
that limited marriage to opposite–sex couples violated the Due Process Clause and the Equal
Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Some of the
main points that the Court held in this case was that the right to marry protects an individual's choice
of marital partner regardless of gender. Moreover, it was held that Proposition 8 was unconstitutional
because it denies plaintiffs a fundamental right without a legitimate reason. It was also held that
Proposition 8 could not withstand any level of strict scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause, as
excluding same–sex couples from marriage is simply not rationally related to a legitimate state
interest. Overall, I

Marriage is the legal and formal recognition of the union of a man and a woman. This simple
definition has been modified several times.In the past, marriage was allowed only through the union
of the same race, such as a white male and white female, black male and black female, however,
now, it is a battle of allowing the marriage of the same–sex. The fight is not only to help protect
rights for same–sex couples, but, also, to interracial couples, who have been experiencing racism and
discrimination. This battle for marriage equality for same–sex couples started in the late 90s, yet it is
still currently a problem. Although the Supreme Court has given the right to marry to whom they
desire, many still disagree. The Constitution plays a...show more content...
is changing and how, not only the countries constitution expands, but also the states constitution.
Vermont added the "Common Benefits Clause" to ensure that the same benefits that are given to
opposite–sex couples are being given to same–sex couples as well, to make sure no type of person
was seen lower than another based on relationship status.
In addition to this graph, the article by History.com, "Gay Marriage" (2017) states that people
have really changed, in fifteen years. The Pew Research Center created a poll and gave it to people
in 2001 and in 2016. When this poll was first given, 57 percent of Americans opposed same–sex
marriage and 35 percent of Americans were supportive. The second time they gave this poll, the
percentages were the complete opposite due to the fact that around 37 percent were opposed and
around 55 were supportive. This shows that many people have changed their views on same–sex
marriage over time, and so has the constitution. Now, it states that it protects the rights of same–sex
couples who want to marry. As the Constitution changes its meanings to support the people, the
people change as well in order to fit society's needs and perspectives. Similarly, a graph is shown of
the year 2015

In 2015, the United States Supreme Court legalized same sex marriage in all 50 states. Prior to their
decision, same–sex marriage was already legal in 37 states and Washington DC, but was banned in
the remaining 13. US public opinion had shifted significantly over the years, from 27% approval of
gay marriage in 1996 to 60% in 2015. Same–sex marriage became legal (nationwide or in some parts)
in Argentina, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Denmark, Finland, France (although married
same–sex couples are not legally allowed access to reproductive technology), Iceland, Ireland,
Luxembourg, Mexico (same–sex marriage is recognized through injunctions – a process more
complicated than for heterosexual couples), the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Portugal, South
Africa, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Uruguay. Although this has been
a monumental achievement in the LGBTQ community regarding same sex marriages, same sex
couples still face inequalities and are unable to enjoy equal marriage rights. Many of these
inequalities are in regards to benefits, the difficulties of adopting in order to achieve a family, and
divorce due to not being able to define consummation with same sex couples.
Getting married means becoming one with your partner and sharing a life together. For some,
sharing isn't that easy. Many of the benefits heterosexual couples get, it is a lot more difficult for
same sex couples. There are 1,138 benefits, rights and protections available

Persuasive Speech On Same Sex Marriage
Homosexual marriage is blasphemous
Same sex marriage will never be justifiable as it contradicts to moral law. Marriage has dependably
been an immense piece of human connections. It is a sacred vow between a man and a woman, the
bonding of two individuals together for emotional support, moral support as well as the rearing of
children. Most of society looks at marriage as a holy union of just one man and one woman. But as
of today many couple have been married in same sex, and many people also accept it. Yes, you
have your freewill to love others but believe it or not we cannot change the fact that man is for a
woman only. Same sex marriage is immoral and it is not like accepting homosexual marriage can
cause positive impact in our country therefore same sex...show more content...
It is not even written in the holy bible that either both man or woman can marry so we don't have
any reason to legalize it. Legalizing same sex marriage will start the corruption of the minds of the
people specially the children, if they will not show the proper values and principle of marriage to
the young generation who else will? If we will allow same sex marriage illegal endorsement the
level of promiscuity, mental health, monogamy, HIV/AIDS will increase due to the risky behavior of
the homosexual couples.
Before we can understand same–sex marriage, there are 2 things that we must understand. First is,
that God created humans in his own image. In Genesis 1:27 it is stated, "So God created mankind
in his own image, in the image of God he created them..." When God created the living creatures, he
only spoke his command before it appeared before him. However, when God created mankind, he
created us through his own image. This shows that human kind is special towards God, as he
personally molded humans to suit his image. Second, God

The issue of same sex marriage is an arguement that everyone has heard before. Some states, like
California, argue incessantly about it; they pass and repeal the same few bills and laws dozens of
times before anything gets done. In other countries, Canada for example, it is legal universally. Not
allowing same sex marriage is a violation of constitutional law (Gannon). The constitution says that
we all have equal rights, yet part of the population isn't allowed to marry the people they love.
Though the LGBT population in the United States is only roughly 2%, they are still a valuable part
of the community. Every human should be able to be married, no matter what their gender
preference. Love is love, whether it's between a man and...show more content...
The catholic church's stance on same sex marriage, and homosexuality in general, is often
misconstrued. Most people think that simply because a person is Catholic, they are against gay
rights; or in some cases even homophobic. In the catechism it states that "tradition has always
declared that "homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered." They are contrary to the natural law.
They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and
sexual complementary. I completely agree with same sex marriage. What is the harm in
marrying the person you really love? Us, heterosexual people do it almost everyday. As far as the
community and children's views, I believe this issue should be showed publicly and explained to
this generation. Especially to the children that are old enough to ask questions and understand
that the life they live maybe considered "different". Now, I am not saying we must go in dept or
deep detail about the life of a gay person or transgender. Just simply explain to them that gays and
transgenders have their own prefrences or their own ways of doing things in life but we are
human beings and all deserved to be treated equally. Most kids are now discovering their sexually
prefrences while still in school. I applaud the new generation of kids that are not ashamed of who
they are and really want. You just cannot discriminate againist someone for liking what they like.
What if we lived in a world where like the opposite

Music has a variety of effects on people. They can be anywhere from a range from negative to
positive, or something in between. Regardless, it still has massive influential power. Many
arguments exist concerning the impact that music has on people. Songs can prove to be very
beneficial and can teach the younger audience life lessons. Music has the ability to promote same sex
marriage, allow people to overcome obstacles, and encourage the downfall of gun violence in
Chicago.
First of all, music has the capability of positively influencing the audience by providing a positive
message incorporated into their music. One societal change that that the world is forced to look
upon is the promotion of same sex marriage laws. In 2012, Macklemore released a song titled,
"Same Love". In this song, Macklemore depicts a man struggling to discover his identity,
particularly in his childhood. Macklemore sings, "When I was in the 3rd grade I thought that I
was gay 'cause I could draw... I told my mom, tears rushing down my face" ("Same Love"). In the
beginning of the song, he was conflicted about his sexuality and was in a state of confusion. For the
people that are in similar situations, will also experience these kind of struggles throughout their
lifetime. Later in the song, he sings, "It's human rights for everybody. There is no difference. Live
on! And be yourself!"(Macklemore, "Same Love"). This phrase is the essence of the meaning behind
the song. It says that human rights are for

Yes, everyone says that now same sex marriage is legal in all 50 states, all same sex couples are
equal. This is actually very un true. same sex couples do not have all of the same rights and do
not get treated equally. Some couples are scared just to be walking in public because the fact that
other people may yell at them, someone may hurt them, or someone may even do something
worse. Most kids are scared to be themselves because they still have to go to school where there
are kids who will laugh and make fun of them for being who they are. The brave ones, take that
leap in their relationship and decide to get married just like everyone else. Just like straight
couples, same sex couples get married because they are in love and want to spend the rest of their
lives together. They want to be able to have the family and the house and the cars that a lot of
people grow up hoping for. Sometimes same sex couples are denied rights they didn't think could be
a thing taken away from them.
Many basic marriage rights are denied such as adoption, hospital visitation, child custody, etc.
When someone has just had a major surgery, they are moved to the ICU, intensive care unit, in
which they will stay there until they are healthy enough to be moved. In the ICU, only mediate
family members are allowed to visit. In many cases, if a persons domestic partner is in the ICU,
some hospitals will not allow the partner to visit the patient or give them updates. A case like this
one happens in

Same Sex Marriage Persuasive Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Paper Writing Service Cheap

More from Paper Writing Service Cheap (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Same Sex Marriage Persuasive Essay