SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 106
Download to read offline
European judicial systems
CEPEJ Evaluation report
2020 Evaluation cycle (2018 data)
Part 2
Country profiles
Council of Europe
French edition:
Fiches pays (Partie 2)
All requests concerning the reproduction
or translation of all or part of the
document should be addressed to the
Directorate of Communication (F-67075
Strasbourg Cedex or publishing@coe.int).
All other correspondence concerning this
document should be addressed to:
xxxxx
Cover and layout:
Documents and publications
production Department (SPDP),
Council of Europe
Photos: Council of Europe, ©shutterstock
© Council of Europe, September 2020
Printed at the Council of Europe
The CEPEJ Report on the
evaluation of judicial systems is
composed of three parts :
	f Tables, graphs and analyses (Part 1)
	f Country Profile (Part 2) 	
f The CEPEJ-STAT dynamic database
(https://www.coe.int/en/web/
cepej/dynamic-database-of-
european-judicial-systems)
CONTENTS
ALBANIA	 8
ARMENIA	 10
AUSTRIA	 12
AZERBAIJAN	 14
BELGIUM	 16
BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA	 18
BULGARIA	 20
CROATIA	 22
CYPRUS	 24
CZECH REPUBLIC	 26
DENMARK	 28
ESTONIA	 30
FINLAND	 32
FRANCE	 34
GEORGIA	 36
GERMANY	 38
GREECE	 40
HUNGARY	 42
ICELAND	 44
IRELAND	 46
ITALY	 48
LATVIA	 50
LITHUANIA	 52
LUXEMBOURG	 54
MALTA	 56
MONACO	 58
MONTENEGRO	 60
NETHERLANDS	 62
NORTH MACEDONIA	 64
NORWAY	 66
POLAND	 68
PORTUGAL	 70
REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA	 72
ROMANIA	 74
RUSSIAN FEDERATION	 76
SERBIA	 78
SLOVAK REPUBLIC	 80
SLOVENIA	 82
SPAIN	 84
SWEDEN	 86
SWITZERLAND	 88
TURKEY	 90
UKRAINE	 92
ENGLAND AND WALES	 94
NORTHERN IRELAND	 96
SCOTLAND	 98
ISRAEL	 100
KAZAKHSTAN	 102
MOROCCO	 104
Page 7
HOW TO READ THE GRAPHS FOR
QUANTITATIVE DATA?
Most of the graphs in these country profiles present numerical indicators that read as follows:
	f the value of the country is presented by the blue dot
	f the European median is presented by the yellow line
	f the European minimum and maximum range (without the extreme values) is presented by the light blue bar
HOW TO READ THE GRAPHS
FOR QUALITATIVE DATA?
The graphs below provide information on the country’s answer in relation to the trend in Europe.
For example, in the graph below, the country is in line with the general trend (43 participating states replied in
the same way) pointing out that the authority responsible for recruitment is a mixed authority.
Memb
GDP per capitPopulation 11 431 406,00
Professional judges 13.3
Non-judge staff 43.5
Prosecutors 7.7
Non-prosecutor staff 22.0
Lawyers 163.2
17,7
60,9
11,2
14,9
123,0
Human Resources
(per 100 000 inhabitants)
Judicial Sys
Financial
In Euros, per
↳ Cou
↳ Leg
↳ Pros
Court Taxes
Case-law of the higher court/s Legal texts
http://www.juridat.be; https://justice.belgium.be/fr/ordre_judiciaire/cours_et_tribunaux/cour_.. http://www.e
Judiciary related websites
Recruitment and promotion of judges Recruitm
Recruitment
authority
By an authority made up of judges
only
By an authority made up of
non-judges only
By an authority made up of judges
and non-judges
Promotion authority Same authority as for recruitment
of judges
Promotion criteria Criteria for promotion: Years of
experience
446
455
43 7
1832
1139
Recruitme
authority
Promotion
Promotion
European Median
Selected
country
European Min
(excl Outliers)
European Max
(excl Outliers)
ALBANIA
MemberState/EntityProfile:Albania
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
Exchangerate133,07Avggrossannualsalary4717,00GDPpercapita4460,00Population2870324,00
Professionaljudges12.1
Non-judgestaff30.9
ProsecutorsNA
Non-prosecutorstaffNA
Lawyers86.2
17,7
60,9
11,2
14,9
123,0
HumanResources
(per100000inhabitants)
JudicialSystemNA€
61,30€
FinancialResources
InEuros,perinhabitant
↳Courts5.9€
↳LegalAidNA€
↳ProsecutionServices4.2€
40,79€
2,67€
11,78€
CourtTaxesNA€
7,67€
Judges
Prosecutors
4,2
2,9
3,4
2,4
Salariesofjudgesandprosecutors
Ratiowithaverageannualsalaryatthebeginingandtheendofcarreer
Case-lawofthehighercourt/sLegaltextsOtherdocuments
www.qbz.gov.alwww.pyetshtetin.alwww.gjykataelarte.gov.al
Judiciaryrelatedwebsites
RecruitmentandpromotionofjudgesRecruitmentandpromotionofprosecutorsICTinjudiciary
(indexfrom0to10)
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
only
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-judgesonly
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
andnon-judges
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitment
ofjudges
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:
Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
446
455
437
1832
1139
1139
2030
1832
2030
3614
464
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsandnon-prosecutors
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitmentof
prosecutors
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
3416
464
1733
1535
464
464
2129
1238
1634
3119
49
0246810
DeploymentrateCIVIL4,1
CRIMINAL4,2
ADMIN4,1
Communication
withcourts
CIVIL0,3
CRIMINAL0,3
ADMIN0,3
Courtsandcase
management
CIVIL7,7
CRIMINAL7,7
ADMIN7,7
DecisionsupportCIVIL5,6
CRIMINAL6,2
ADMIN5,6
6,5
5,8
6,0
5,8
4,1
5,4
7,5
7,5
7,4
6,7
7,1
6,7
Page9
MemberState/EntityProfile:Albania
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
CEPEJefficiencyIndicators
ClearanceRate(CR)=(ResolvedCases/IncomingCases)*100|DispositionTime(DT)=(PendingCases/ResolvedCases)*365
IncomingCases=Allnewcasesatthatinstancewithintheyear|ResolvedCases=Casesfinalisedatthatinstancewithintheyear|PendingCases=UnresolvedCasesonthe31stofDecember
ClearanceRate
Civilcases1stInstance97.6%
2ndInstanceNA
HighestInstanceNA
Criminal
cases
1stInstance97.6%
2ndInstance136.5%
HighestInstanceNA
Administrat
ivecases
1stInstance99.0%
2ndInstanceNA
HighestInstanceNA
1,01
1,02
0,99
1,00
0,99
0,98
1,00
0,97
0,98
DispositionTime
171days
NA
NA
80days
280days
NA
89days
NA
NA
200,57
140,51
207,44
121,88
103,62
114,16
241,36
208,57
228,10
IncomingCases/100inhabitants
0.623
NA
NA
0.494
0.141
NA
0.596
NA
NA
2,23
0,23
0,05
1,62
0,16
0,02
0,33
0,10
0,04
ResolvedCases/100inhabitants
0.607
NA
NA
0.482
0.193
NA
0.590
NA
NA
2,14
0,24
0,05
1,58
0,15
0,02
0,35
0,11
0,03
PendingCases/100inhabitants
0.286
NA
NA
0.106
0.148
NA
0.145
NA
NA
Prosecutioncasesper100inhabitantProsecutioncasesperprosecutorCourtrelatedmediation
Received1.63
Discontinued1.13
ConcludedbyapenaltyNAP
Chargedbeforethecourts0.41
2,07
1,04
0,20
0,59
ReceivedNA
DiscontinuedNA
ConcludedbyapenaltyNAP
ChargedbeforethecourtsNA
189,65
74,55
16,07
51,61
Note:Therearedifferentmethodologiesoncalculatingnumberofcasesinprosecutionstatisticsbyeventorbyperpetrator.CEPEJcollects
datapercase(event)butsomecountriespresentitbyperpetrator.
Doesthejudicialsystemprovideforcourt-relatedmediation
procedures?
464
Mandatorymediationbeforegoingtocourt
Mandatorymediationorderedbyajudge
3614
2921
AlternativedisputeresolutionArbitration
Conciliation
Mediation(otherthanjudicial
mediation)
OtherADR
482
1337
464
3119
ARMENIA
MemberState/EntityProfile:Armenia
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
Exchangerate554,80Avggrossannualsalary3840,00GDPpercapita3544,00Population2962000,00
Professionaljudges8.0
Non-judgestaff66.7
Prosecutors11.1
Non-prosecutorstaff10.6
Lawyers72.2
17,7
60,9
11,2
14,9
123,0
HumanResources
(per100000inhabitants)
JudicialSystem8.2€
61,30€
FinancialResources
InEuros,perinhabitant
↳Courts5.2€
↳LegalAid0.2€
↳ProsecutionServices2.7€
40,79€
2,67€
11,78€
CourtTaxes0.9€
7,67€
Judges
Prosecutors
6,0
4,1
2,5
Salariesofjudgesandprosecutors
Ratiowithaverageannualsalaryatthebeginingandtheendofcarreer
Case-lawofthehighercourt/sLegaltextsOtherdocuments
www.e-draft.amwww.datalex.amwww.arlis.am
Judiciaryrelatedwebsites
RecruitmentandpromotionofjudgesRecruitmentandpromotionofprosecutorsICTinjudiciary
(indexfrom0to10)
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
only
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-judgesonly
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
andnon-judges
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitment
ofjudges
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:
Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
446
455
437
1832
1139
1139
2030
1832
2030
3614
464
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsandnon-prosecutors
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitmentof
prosecutors
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
3416
464
1733
1535
464
464
2129
1238
1634
3119
49
0246810
DeploymentrateCIVIL2,1
CRIMINAL2,3
ADMIN2,3
Communication
withcourts
CIVIL0,5
CRIMINAL0,5
ADMIN0,6
Courtsandcase
management
CIVIL3,4
CRIMINAL3,4
ADMIN3,4
DecisionsupportCIVIL3,9
CRIMINAL4,8
ADMIN4,4
6,5
5,8
6,0
5,8
4,1
5,4
7,5
7,5
7,4
6,7
7,1
6,7
Page11
MemberState/EntityProfile:Armenia
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
CEPEJefficiencyIndicators
ClearanceRate(CR)=(ResolvedCases/IncomingCases)*100|DispositionTime(DT)=(PendingCases/ResolvedCases)*365
IncomingCases=Allnewcasesatthatinstancewithintheyear|ResolvedCases=Casesfinalisedatthatinstancewithintheyear|PendingCases=UnresolvedCasesonthe31stofDecember
ClearanceRate
Civilcases1stInstance100.7%
2ndInstance102.4%
HighestInstance91.3%
Criminal
cases
1stInstance104.3%
2ndInstanceNA
HighestInstance98.0%
Administrat
ivecases
1stInstance117.9%
2ndInstance90.9%
HighestInstance92.4%
1,01
1,02
0,99
1,00
0,99
0,98
1,00
0,97
0,98
DispositionTime
194days
58days
98days
215days
NA
50days
119days
302days
77days
200,57
140,51
207,44
121,88
103,62
114,16
241,36
208,57
228,10
IncomingCases/100inhabitants
2.847
0.143
0.053
0.099
NA
0.067
0.470
0.135
0.031
2,23
0,23
0,05
1,62
0,16
0,02
0,33
0,10
0,04
ResolvedCases/100inhabitants
2.866
0.147
0.049
0.103
NA
0.066
0.554
0.123
0.028
2,14
0,24
0,05
1,58
0,15
0,02
0,35
0,11
0,03
PendingCases/100inhabitants
1.525
0.023
0.013
0.061
NA
0.009
0.181
0.102
0.006
Prosecutioncasesper100inhabitantProsecutioncasesperprosecutorCourtrelatedmediation
Received0.34
Discontinued0.24
ConcludedbyapenaltyNAP
Chargedbeforethecourts0.10
2,07
1,04
0,20
0,59
Received30.9
Discontinued22.0
ConcludedbyapenaltyNAP
Chargedbeforethecourts8.9
189,65
74,55
16,07
51,61
Note:Therearedifferentmethodologiesoncalculatingnumberofcasesinprosecutionstatisticsbyeventorbyperpetrator.CEPEJcollects
datapercase(event)butsomecountriespresentitbyperpetrator.
Doesthejudicialsystemprovideforcourt-relatedmediation
procedures?
464
Mandatorymediationbeforegoingtocourt
Mandatorymediationorderedbyajudge
3614
2921
AlternativedisputeresolutionArbitration
Conciliation
Mediation(otherthanjudicial
mediation)
OtherADR
482
1337
464
3119
AUSTRIA
MemberState/EntityProfile:Austria
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
ExchangerateNAPAvggrossannualsalary35240,00GDPpercapita43680,00Population8822267,00
Professionaljudges27.3
Non-judgestaff56.3
Prosecutors4.3
Non-prosecutorstaff3.8
Lawyers73.5
17,7
60,9
11,2
14,9
123,0
HumanResources
(per100000inhabitants)
JudicialSystem124.9€
61,30€
FinancialResources
InEuros,perinhabitant
↳CourtsNA€
↳LegalAid2.2€
↳ProsecutionServicesNA€
40,79€
2,67€
11,78€
CourtTaxes135.4€
7,67€
Judges
Prosecutors
3,7
1,5
3,7
1,6
Salariesofjudgesandprosecutors
Ratiowithaverageannualsalaryatthebeginingandtheendofcarreer
Case-lawofthehighercourt/sLegaltextsOtherdocuments
www.ris.bka.gv.at;www.findok.bmf.gv.atwww.ris.bka.gv.atwww.justiz.gv.at;www.findok.bmf.gv.at;www.vwgh.gv.at/service/formulare
Judiciaryrelatedwebsites
RecruitmentandpromotionofjudgesRecruitmentandpromotionofprosecutorsICTinjudiciary
(indexfrom0to10)
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
only
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-judgesonly
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
andnon-judges
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitment
ofjudges
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:
Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
446
455
437
1832
1139
1139
2030
1832
2030
3614
464
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsandnon-prosecutors
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitmentof
prosecutors
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
3416
464
1733
1535
464
464
2129
1238
1634
3119
49
0246810
DeploymentrateCIVIL8,7
CRIMINAL8,3
ADMIN8,1
Communication
withcourts
CIVIL9,9
CRIMINAL9,4
ADMIN9,2
Courtsandcase
management
CIVIL7,3
CRIMINAL6,6
ADMIN6,6
DecisionsupportCIVIL9,3
CRIMINAL10,0
ADMIN9,3
6,5
5,8
6,0
5,8
4,1
5,4
7,5
7,5
7,4
6,7
7,1
6,7
Page13
MemberState/EntityProfile:Austria
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
CEPEJefficiencyIndicators
ClearanceRate(CR)=(ResolvedCases/IncomingCases)*100|DispositionTime(DT)=(PendingCases/ResolvedCases)*365
IncomingCases=Allnewcasesatthatinstancewithintheyear|ResolvedCases=Casesfinalisedatthatinstancewithintheyear|PendingCases=UnresolvedCasesonthe31stofDecember
ClearanceRate
Civilcases1stInstance100.8%
2ndInstanceNA
HighestInstanceNA
Criminal
cases
1stInstance101.5%
2ndInstance100.4%
HighestInstance106.7%
Administrat
ivecases
1stInstance89.7%
2ndInstanceNA
HighestInstance99.8%
1,01
1,02
0,99
1,00
0,99
0,98
1,00
0,97
0,98
DispositionTime
137days
NA
NA
120days
43days
122days
449days
NA
118days
200,57
140,51
207,44
121,88
103,62
114,16
241,36
208,57
228,10
IncomingCases/100inhabitants
0.945
NA
NA
0.794
0.109
0.021
0.811
NA
0.077
2,23
0,23
0,05
1,62
0,16
0,02
0,33
0,10
0,04
ResolvedCases/100inhabitants
0.953
NA
NA
0.805
0.110
0.022
0.727
NA
0.077
2,14
0,24
0,05
1,58
0,15
0,02
0,35
0,11
0,03
PendingCases/100inhabitants
0.360
NA
NA
0.265
0.013
0.008
0.896
NA
0.025
Prosecutioncasesper100inhabitantProsecutioncasesperprosecutorCourtrelatedmediation
Received5.28
Discontinued4.22
Concludedbyapenalty0.21
Chargedbeforethecourts0.69
2,07
1,04
0,20
0,59
Received1242.5
Discontinued992.6
Concludedbyapenalty49.4
Chargedbeforethecourts162.0
189,65
74,55
16,07
51,61
Note:Therearedifferentmethodologiesoncalculatingnumberofcasesinprosecutionstatisticsbyeventorbyperpetrator.CEPEJcollects
datapercase(event)butsomecountriespresentitbyperpetrator.
Doesthejudicialsystemprovideforcourt-relatedmediation
procedures?
464
Mandatorymediationbeforegoingtocourt
Mandatorymediationorderedbyajudge
3614
2921
AlternativedisputeresolutionArbitration
Conciliation
Mediation(otherthanjudicial
mediation)
OtherADR
482
1337
464
3119
AZERBAIJAN
MemberState/EntityProfile:Azerbaijan
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
Exchangerate1,95Avggrossannualsalary3354,00GDPpercapita4174,00Population9898100,00
Professionaljudges5.7
Non-judgestaff26.7
Prosecutors12.0
Non-prosecutorstaffNA
Lawyers15.7
17,7
60,9
11,2
14,9
123,0
HumanResources
(per100000inhabitants)
JudicialSystem8.5€
61,30€
FinancialResources
InEuros,perinhabitant
↳Courts5.1€
↳LegalAid0.1€
↳ProsecutionServices3.4€
40,79€
2,67€
11,78€
CourtTaxes0.2€
7,67€
Judges
Prosecutors
7,2
4,4
3,3
1,1
Salariesofjudgesandprosecutors
Ratiowithaverageannualsalaryatthebeginingandtheendofcarreer
Case-lawofthehighercourt/sLegaltextsOtherdocuments
justice.gov.az;jlc.gov.aze-qanun.azcourts.gov.az
Judiciaryrelatedwebsites
RecruitmentandpromotionofjudgesRecruitmentandpromotionofprosecutorsICTinjudiciary
(indexfrom0to10)
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
only
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-judgesonly
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
andnon-judges
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitment
ofjudges
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:
Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
446
455
437
1832
1139
1139
2030
1832
2030
3614
464
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsandnon-prosecutors
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitmentof
prosecutors
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
3416
464
1733
1535
464
464
2129
1238
1634
3119
49
0246810
DeploymentrateCIVIL7,5
CRIMINAL5,8
ADMIN6,9
Communication
withcourts
CIVIL8,0
CRIMINAL4,0
ADMIN6,5
Courtsandcase
management
CIVIL7,3
CRIMINAL7,3
ADMIN7,3
DecisionsupportCIVIL6,7
CRIMINAL7,2
ADMIN6,7
6,5
5,8
6,0
5,8
4,1
5,4
7,5
7,5
7,4
6,7
7,1
6,7
Page15
MemberState/EntityProfile:Azerbaijan
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
CEPEJefficiencyIndicators
ClearanceRate(CR)=(ResolvedCases/IncomingCases)*100|DispositionTime(DT)=(PendingCases/ResolvedCases)*365
IncomingCases=Allnewcasesatthatinstancewithintheyear|ResolvedCases=Casesfinalisedatthatinstancewithintheyear|PendingCases=UnresolvedCasesonthe31stofDecember
ClearanceRate
Civilcases1stInstance99.4%
2ndInstance98.2%
HighestInstance100.8%
Criminal
cases
1stInstance100.9%
2ndInstance98.6%
HighestInstance97.0%
Administrat
ivecases
1stInstance98.5%
2ndInstance96.9%
HighestInstance90.0%
1,01
1,02
0,99
1,00
0,99
0,98
1,00
0,97
0,98
DispositionTime
51days
68days
47days
72days
38days
121days
76days
59days
97days
200,57
140,51
207,44
121,88
103,62
114,16
241,36
208,57
228,10
IncomingCases/100inhabitants
2.334
0.310
0.091
0.125
0.059
0.017
0.178
0.058
0.028
2,23
0,23
0,05
1,62
0,16
0,02
0,33
0,10
0,04
ResolvedCases/100inhabitants
2.320
0.304
0.092
0.127
0.058
0.017
0.175
0.056
0.025
2,14
0,24
0,05
1,58
0,15
0,02
0,35
0,11
0,03
PendingCases/100inhabitants
0.325
0.057
0.012
0.025
0.006
0.006
0.036
0.009
0.007
Prosecutioncasesper100inhabitantProsecutioncasesperprosecutorCourtrelatedmediation
ReceivedNA
Discontinued0.07
ConcludedbyapenaltyNAP
Chargedbeforethecourts0.11
2,07
1,04
0,20
0,59
ReceivedNA
Discontinued6.3
ConcludedbyapenaltyNAP
Chargedbeforethecourts9.3
189,65
74,55
16,07
51,61
Note:Therearedifferentmethodologiesoncalculatingnumberofcasesinprosecutionstatisticsbyeventorbyperpetrator.CEPEJcollects
datapercase(event)butsomecountriespresentitbyperpetrator.
Doesthejudicialsystemprovideforcourt-relatedmediation
procedures?
464
Mandatorymediationbeforegoingtocourt
Mandatorymediationorderedbyajudge
3614
2921
AlternativedisputeresolutionArbitration
Conciliation
Mediation(otherthanjudicial
mediation)
OtherADR
482
1337
464
3119
BELGIUM
MemberState/EntityProfile:Belgium
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
ExchangerateNAPAvggrossannualsalary43497,00GDPpercapita39500,00Population11431406,00
Professionaljudges13.3
Non-judgestaff43.5
Prosecutors7.7
Non-prosecutorstaff22.0
Lawyers163.2
17,7
60,9
11,2
14,9
123,0
HumanResources
(per100000inhabitants)
JudicialSystem83.7€
61,30€
FinancialResources
InEuros,perinhabitant
↳CourtsNA€
↳LegalAid9.0€
↳ProsecutionServicesNA€
40,79€
2,67€
11,78€
CourtTaxes2.7€
7,67€
Judges
Prosecutors
3,0
1,6
3,0
1,6
Salariesofjudgesandprosecutors
Ratiowithaverageannualsalaryatthebeginingandtheendofcarreer
Case-lawofthehighercourt/sLegaltextsOtherdocuments
https://www.tribunaux-rechtbanken.be;https://justice.belgium.be/fr;https://justice.belgium.be..http://www.juridat.be;https://justice.belgium.be/fr/ordre_judiciaire/cours_et_tribunaux/cour_..http://www.ejustice.just.fgov.be/cgi_loi/loi.pl;https://justice.belgium.be/fr;https://justice.belgi..
Judiciaryrelatedwebsites
RecruitmentandpromotionofjudgesRecruitmentandpromotionofprosecutorsICTinjudiciary
(indexfrom0to10)
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
only
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-judgesonly
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
andnon-judges
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitment
ofjudges
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:
Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
446
455
437
1832
1139
1139
2030
1832
2030
3614
464
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsandnon-prosecutors
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitmentof
prosecutors
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
3416
464
1733
1535
464
464
2129
1238
1634
3119
49
0246810
DeploymentrateCIVIL3,9
CRIMINAL4,0
ADMIN5,6
Communication
withcourts
CIVIL1,3
CRIMINAL1,3
ADMIN5,4
Courtsandcase
management
CIVIL5,9
CRIMINAL5,9
ADMIN5,9
DecisionsupportCIVIL7,0
CRIMINAL7,5
ADMIN5,6
6,5
5,8
6,0
5,8
4,1
5,4
7,5
7,5
7,4
6,7
7,1
6,7
Page17
MemberState/EntityProfile:Belgium
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
CEPEJefficiencyIndicators
ClearanceRate(CR)=(ResolvedCases/IncomingCases)*100|DispositionTime(DT)=(PendingCases/ResolvedCases)*365
IncomingCases=Allnewcasesatthatinstancewithintheyear|ResolvedCases=Casesfinalisedatthatinstancewithintheyear|PendingCases=UnresolvedCasesonthe31stofDecember
ClearanceRate
Civilcases1stInstance112.5%
2ndInstance104.0%
HighestInstance96.1%
Criminal
cases
1stInstance99.9%
2ndInstance96.1%
HighestInstance104.0%
Administrat
ivecases
1stInstance118.8%
2ndInstanceNAP
HighestInstance80.9%
1,01
1,02
0,99
1,00
0,99
0,98
1,00
0,97
0,98
DispositionTime
NA
NA
472days
NA
NA
144days
370days
NAP
316days
200,57
140,51
207,44
121,88
103,62
114,16
241,36
208,57
228,10
IncomingCases/100inhabitants
6.712
0.224
0.008
2.261
0.257
0.012
0.146
NAP
0.004
2,23
0,23
0,05
1,62
0,16
0,02
0,33
0,10
0,04
ResolvedCases/100inhabitants
7.548
0.233
0.008
2.258
0.247
0.012
0.173
NAP
0.003
2,14
0,24
0,05
1,58
0,15
0,02
0,35
0,11
0,03
PendingCases/100inhabitants
NA
NA
0.010
NA
NA
0.005
0.176
NAP
0.003
Prosecutioncasesper100inhabitantProsecutioncasesperprosecutorCourtrelatedmediation
Received4.79
Discontinued2.98
Concludedbyapenalty0.40
Chargedbeforethecourts0.22
2,07
1,04
0,20
0,59
Received623.4
Discontinued388.0
Concludedbyapenalty51.9
Chargedbeforethecourts28.3
189,65
74,55
16,07
51,61
Note:Therearedifferentmethodologiesoncalculatingnumberofcasesinprosecutionstatisticsbyeventorbyperpetrator.CEPEJcollects
datapercase(event)butsomecountriespresentitbyperpetrator.
Doesthejudicialsystemprovideforcourt-relatedmediation
procedures?
464
Mandatorymediationbeforegoingtocourt
Mandatorymediationorderedbyajudge
3614
2921
AlternativedisputeresolutionArbitration
Conciliation
Mediation(otherthanjudicial
mediation)
OtherADR
482
1337
464
3119
BOSNIAANDHERZEGOVINA
MemberState/EntityProfile:BosniaandHerzegovina
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
Exchangerate1,96Avggrossannualsalary8363,00GDPpercapita4886,00Population3496121,00
Professionaljudges29.0
Non-judgestaff96.0
Prosecutors10.8
Non-prosecutorstaff21.0
Lawyers49.1
17,7
60,9
11,2
14,9
123,0
HumanResources
(per100000inhabitants)
JudicialSystem35.0€
61,30€
FinancialResources
InEuros,perinhabitant
↳Courts25.3€
↳LegalAid2.1€
↳ProsecutionServices7.6€
40,79€
2,67€
11,78€
CourtTaxes6.3€
7,67€
Judges
Prosecutors
5,1
2,9
5,1
2,9
Salariesofjudgesandprosecutors
Ratiowithaverageannualsalaryatthebeginingandtheendofcarreer
Case-lawofthehighercourt/sLegaltextsOtherdocuments
www.ustavnisud.ba,https://www.pravosudje.ba/predm/faces/login.jsp;http://www.parlament.ba/,
Judiciaryrelatedwebsites
RecruitmentandpromotionofjudgesRecruitmentandpromotionofprosecutorsICTinjudiciary
(indexfrom0to10)
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
only
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-judgesonly
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
andnon-judges
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitment
ofjudges
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:
Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
446
455
437
1832
1139
1139
2030
1832
2030
3614
464
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsandnon-prosecutors
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitmentof
prosecutors
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
3416
464
1733
1535
464
464
2129
1238
1634
3119
49
0246810
DeploymentrateCIVIL4,1
CRIMINAL4,6
ADMIN4,1
Communication
withcourts
CIVIL0,4
CRIMINAL1,9
ADMIN0,4
Courtsandcase
management
CIVIL7,5
CRIMINAL6,8
ADMIN7,5
DecisionsupportCIVIL6,0
CRIMINAL6,6
ADMIN6,0
6,5
5,8
6,0
5,8
4,1
5,4
7,5
7,5
7,4
6,7
7,1
6,7
Page19
MemberState/EntityProfile:BosniaandHerzegovina
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
CEPEJefficiencyIndicators
ClearanceRate(CR)=(ResolvedCases/IncomingCases)*100|DispositionTime(DT)=(PendingCases/ResolvedCases)*365
IncomingCases=Allnewcasesatthatinstancewithintheyear|ResolvedCases=Casesfinalisedatthatinstancewithintheyear|PendingCases=UnresolvedCasesonthe31stofDecember
ClearanceRate
Civilcases1stInstance125.5%
2ndInstance102.7%
HighestInstance119.4%
Criminal
cases
1stInstance102.1%
2ndInstance101.8%
HighestInstance100.8%
Administrat
ivecases
1stInstance94.4%
2ndInstance108.8%
HighestInstanceNAP
1,01
1,02
0,99
1,00
0,99
0,98
1,00
0,97
0,98
DispositionTime
483days
466days
215days
293days
64days
63days
392days
470days
NAP
200,57
140,51
207,44
121,88
103,62
114,16
241,36
208,57
228,10
IncomingCases/100inhabitants
3.237
0.953
0.147
4.345
0.409
0.124
0.220
0.137
NAP
2,23
0,23
0,05
1,62
0,16
0,02
0,33
0,10
0,04
ResolvedCases/100inhabitants
4.064
0.979
0.175
4.435
0.416
0.125
0.208
0.149
NAP
2,14
0,24
0,05
1,58
0,15
0,02
0,35
0,11
0,03
PendingCases/100inhabitants
5.383
1.252
0.104
3.566
0.073
0.022
0.223
0.192
NAP
Prosecutioncasesper100inhabitantProsecutioncasesperprosecutorCourtrelatedmediation
Received1.53
Discontinued0.28
Concludedbyapenalty0.36
Chargedbeforethecourts0.35
2,07
1,04
0,20
0,59
Received141.9
Discontinued26.2
Concludedbyapenalty33.5
Chargedbeforethecourts32.5
189,65
74,55
16,07
51,61
Note:Therearedifferentmethodologiesoncalculatingnumberofcasesinprosecutionstatisticsbyeventorbyperpetrator.CEPEJcollects
datapercase(event)butsomecountriespresentitbyperpetrator.
Doesthejudicialsystemprovideforcourt-relatedmediation
procedures?
464
Mandatorymediationbeforegoingtocourt
Mandatorymediationorderedbyajudge
3614
2921
AlternativedisputeresolutionArbitration
Conciliation
Mediation(otherthanjudicial
mediation)
OtherADR
482
1337
464
3119
BULGARIA
MemberState/EntityProfile:Bulgaria
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
Exchangerate1,96Avggrossannualsalary6964,00GDPpercapita7855,00Population7000039,00
Professionaljudges31.8
Non-judgestaff89.5
Prosecutors21.8
Non-prosecutorstaff41.5
Lawyers194.9
17,7
60,9
11,2
14,9
123,0
HumanResources
(per100000inhabitants)
JudicialSystem42.3€
61,30€
FinancialResources
InEuros,perinhabitant
↳Courts25.1€
↳LegalAid0.6€
↳ProsecutionServices16.6€
40,79€
2,67€
11,78€
CourtTaxes6.7€
7,67€
Judges
Prosecutors
5,2
2,9
5,2
2,9
Salariesofjudgesandprosecutors
Ratiowithaverageannualsalaryatthebeginingandtheendofcarreer
Case-lawofthehighercourt/sLegaltextsOtherdocuments
www.compensation.bghttp://www.sac.government.bg;http://www.vks.bghttp://dv.parliament.bg
Judiciaryrelatedwebsites
RecruitmentandpromotionofjudgesRecruitmentandpromotionofprosecutorsICTinjudiciary
(indexfrom0to10)
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
only
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-judgesonly
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
andnon-judges
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitment
ofjudges
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:
Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
446
455
437
1832
1139
1139
2030
1832
2030
3614
464
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsandnon-prosecutors
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitmentof
prosecutors
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
3416
464
1733
1535
464
464
2129
1238
1634
3119
49
0246810
DeploymentrateCIVIL3,4
CRIMINAL3,3
ADMIN3,4
Communication
withcourts
CIVIL0,6
CRIMINAL0,6
ADMIN0,6
Courtsandcase
management
CIVIL6,2
CRIMINAL6,2
ADMIN6,2
DecisionsupportCIVIL4,1
CRIMINAL3,5
ADMIN4,1
6,5
5,8
6,0
5,8
4,1
5,4
7,5
7,5
7,4
6,7
7,1
6,7
Page21
MemberState/EntityProfile:Bulgaria
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
CEPEJefficiencyIndicators
ClearanceRate(CR)=(ResolvedCases/IncomingCases)*100|DispositionTime(DT)=(PendingCases/ResolvedCases)*365
IncomingCases=Allnewcasesatthatinstancewithintheyear|ResolvedCases=Casesfinalisedatthatinstancewithintheyear|PendingCases=UnresolvedCasesonthe31stofDecember
ClearanceRate
Civilcases1stInstanceNA
2ndInstanceNA
HighestInstance95.5%
Criminal
cases
1stInstance99.3%
2ndInstance100.5%
HighestInstance102.0%
Administrat
ivecases
1stInstance99.7%
2ndInstance100.8%
HighestInstance100.3%
1,01
1,02
0,99
1,00
0,99
0,98
1,00
0,97
0,98
DispositionTime
NA
NA
183days
51days
49days
75days
112days
59days
140days
200,57
140,51
207,44
121,88
103,62
114,16
241,36
208,57
228,10
IncomingCases/100inhabitants
NA
NA
0.116
2.176
0.183
0.018
0.445
0.210
0.227
2,23
0,23
0,05
1,62
0,16
0,02
0,33
0,10
0,04
ResolvedCases/100inhabitants
NA
NA
0.111
2.161
0.184
0.018
0.443
0.212
0.228
2,14
0,24
0,05
1,58
0,15
0,02
0,35
0,11
0,03
PendingCases/100inhabitants
NA
NA
0.056
0.307
0.025
0.004
0.136
0.034
0.088
Prosecutioncasesper100inhabitantProsecutioncasesperprosecutorCourtrelatedmediation
Received1.64
Discontinued1.12
ConcludedbyapenaltyNAP
Chargedbeforethecourts0.43
2,07
1,04
0,20
0,59
Received75.3
Discontinued51.2
ConcludedbyapenaltyNAP
Chargedbeforethecourts19.8
189,65
74,55
16,07
51,61
Note:Therearedifferentmethodologiesoncalculatingnumberofcasesinprosecutionstatisticsbyeventorbyperpetrator.CEPEJcollects
datapercase(event)butsomecountriespresentitbyperpetrator.
Doesthejudicialsystemprovideforcourt-relatedmediation
procedures?
464
Mandatorymediationbeforegoingtocourt
Mandatorymediationorderedbyajudge
3614
2921
AlternativedisputeresolutionArbitration
Conciliation
Mediation(otherthanjudicial
mediation)
OtherADR
482
1337
464
3119
CROATIA
MemberState/EntityProfile:Croatia
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
Exchangerate7,41Avggrossannualsalary13671,00GDPpercapita12593,00Population4076246,00
Professionaljudges40.7
Non-judgestaff143.0
Prosecutors14.6
Non-prosecutorstaff25.3
Lawyers116.7
17,7
60,9
11,2
14,9
123,0
HumanResources
(per100000inhabitants)
JudicialSystem56.6€
61,30€
FinancialResources
InEuros,perinhabitant
↳Courts41.6€
↳LegalAid3.2€
↳ProsecutionServices11.8€
40,79€
2,67€
11,78€
CourtTaxesNA€
7,67€
Judges
Prosecutors
3,9
1,7
3,9
1,7
Salariesofjudgesandprosecutors
Ratiowithaverageannualsalaryatthebeginingandtheendofcarreer
Case-lawofthehighercourt/sLegaltextsOtherdocuments
www.pravosudje.hrhttps://sudskapraksa.csp.vsrh.hr/homehttps://narodne-novine.nn.hr/search.aspx
Judiciaryrelatedwebsites
RecruitmentandpromotionofjudgesRecruitmentandpromotionofprosecutorsICTinjudiciary
(indexfrom0to10)
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
only
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-judgesonly
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
andnon-judges
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitment
ofjudges
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:
Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
446
455
437
1832
1139
1139
2030
1832
2030
3614
464
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsandnon-prosecutors
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitmentof
prosecutors
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
3416
464
1733
1535
464
464
2129
1238
1634
3119
49
0246810
DeploymentrateCIVIL5,5
CRIMINAL4,8
ADMIN3,7
Communication
withcourts
CIVIL2,7
CRIMINAL1,0
ADMIN0,8
Courtsandcase
management
CIVIL7,5
CRIMINAL7,5
ADMIN6,1
DecisionsupportCIVIL8,9
CRIMINAL9,0
ADMIN5,6
6,5
5,8
6,0
5,8
4,1
5,4
7,5
7,5
7,4
6,7
7,1
6,7
Page23
MemberState/EntityProfile:Croatia
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
CEPEJefficiencyIndicators
ClearanceRate(CR)=(ResolvedCases/IncomingCases)*100|DispositionTime(DT)=(PendingCases/ResolvedCases)*365
IncomingCases=Allnewcasesatthatinstancewithintheyear|ResolvedCases=Casesfinalisedatthatinstancewithintheyear|PendingCases=UnresolvedCasesonthe31stofDecember
ClearanceRate
Civilcases1stInstance112.5%
2ndInstance121.7%
HighestInstanceNA
Criminal
cases
1stInstance100.3%
2ndInstance126.2%
HighestInstance98.9%
Administrat
ivecases
1stInstance115.9%
2ndInstance85.8%
HighestInstanceNA
1,01
1,02
0,99
1,00
0,99
0,98
1,00
0,97
0,98
DispositionTime
374days
279days
NA
147days
160days
135days
197days
194days
NA
200,57
140,51
207,44
121,88
103,62
114,16
241,36
208,57
228,10
IncomingCases/100inhabitants
2.856
0.915
NA
4.580
0.536
0.047
0.329
0.148
NA
2,23
0,23
0,05
1,62
0,16
0,02
0,33
0,10
0,04
ResolvedCases/100inhabitants
3.212
1.113
NA
4.593
0.677
0.047
0.382
0.127
NA
2,14
0,24
0,05
1,58
0,15
0,02
0,35
0,11
0,03
PendingCases/100inhabitants
3.294
0.854
NA
1.855
0.297
0.017
0.207
0.068
NA
Prosecutioncasesper100inhabitantProsecutioncasesperprosecutorCourtrelatedmediation
Received1.52
Discontinued0.60
Concludedbyapenalty0.00
Chargedbeforethecourts0.40
2,07
1,04
0,20
0,59
Received104.0
Discontinued41.1
Concludedbyapenalty0.3
Chargedbeforethecourts27.7
189,65
74,55
16,07
51,61
Note:Therearedifferentmethodologiesoncalculatingnumberofcasesinprosecutionstatisticsbyeventorbyperpetrator.CEPEJcollects
datapercase(event)butsomecountriespresentitbyperpetrator.
Doesthejudicialsystemprovideforcourt-relatedmediation
procedures?
464
Mandatorymediationbeforegoingtocourt
Mandatorymediationorderedbyajudge
3614
2921
AlternativedisputeresolutionArbitration
Conciliation
Mediation(otherthanjudicial
mediation)
OtherADR
482
1337
464
3119
CYPRUS
MemberState/EntityProfile:Cyprus
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
ExchangerateNAPAvggrossannualsalary22896,00GDPpercapita23202,00Population875900,00
Professionaljudges13.5
Non-judgestaff48.7
Prosecutors14.0
Non-prosecutorstaff7.9
Lawyers458.0
17,7
60,9
11,2
14,9
123,0
HumanResources
(per100000inhabitants)
JudicialSystem67.3€
61,30€
FinancialResources
InEuros,perinhabitant
↳Courts42.9€
↳LegalAid2.0€
↳ProsecutionServices22.5€
40,79€
2,67€
11,78€
CourtTaxes8.7€
7,67€
Judges
Prosecutors
6,0
3,4
1,5
Salariesofjudgesandprosecutors
Ratiowithaverageannualsalaryatthebeginingandtheendofcarreer
Case-lawofthehighercourt/sLegaltextsOtherdocuments
xwww.leginet.eu,www.cylaw.comwww.leginet.eu,www.cylaw.com
Judiciaryrelatedwebsites
RecruitmentandpromotionofjudgesRecruitmentandpromotionofprosecutorsICTinjudiciary
(indexfrom0to10)
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
only
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-judgesonly
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
andnon-judges
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitment
ofjudges
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:
Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
446
455
437
1832
1139
1139
2030
1832
2030
3614
464
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsandnon-prosecutors
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitmentof
prosecutors
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
3416
464
1733
1535
464
464
2129
1238
1634
3119
49
0246810
DeploymentrateCIVIL1,3
CRIMINAL1,3
ADMIN1,3
Communication
withcourts
CIVIL0
CRIMINAL0
ADMIN0
Courtsandcase
management
CIVIL2,5
CRIMINAL2,5
ADMIN2,5
DecisionsupportCIVIL2,2
CRIMINAL1,9
ADMIN2,2
6,5
5,8
6,0
5,8
4,1
5,4
7,5
7,5
7,4
6,7
7,1
6,7
Page25
MemberState/EntityProfile:Cyprus
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
CEPEJefficiencyIndicators
ClearanceRate(CR)=(ResolvedCases/IncomingCases)*100|DispositionTime(DT)=(PendingCases/ResolvedCases)*365
IncomingCases=Allnewcasesatthatinstancewithintheyear|ResolvedCases=Casesfinalisedatthatinstancewithintheyear|PendingCases=UnresolvedCasesonthe31stofDecember
ClearanceRate
Civilcases1stInstanceNA
2ndInstanceNA
HighestInstanceNAP
Criminal
cases
1stInstance96.1%
2ndInstance82.0%
HighestInstanceNAP
Administrat
ivecases
1stInstance219.2%
2ndInstance84.1%
HighestInstanceNAP
1,01
1,02
0,99
1,00
0,99
0,98
1,00
0,97
0,98
DispositionTime
NA
NA
NAP
273days
753days
NAP
486days
2155days
NAP
200,57
140,51
207,44
121,88
103,62
114,16
241,36
208,57
228,10
IncomingCases/100inhabitants
NA
NA
NAP
7.769
0.041
NAP
0.223
0.022
NAP
2,23
0,23
0,05
1,62
0,16
0,02
0,33
0,10
0,04
ResolvedCases/100inhabitants
NA
NA
NAP
7.468
0.033
NAP
0.488
0.018
NAP
2,14
0,24
0,05
1,58
0,15
0,02
0,35
0,11
0,03
PendingCases/100inhabitants
NA
NA
NAP
5.589
0.069
NAP
0.651
0.107
NAP
Prosecutioncasesper100inhabitantProsecutioncasesperprosecutorCourtrelatedmediation
ReceivedNA
DiscontinuedNA
ConcludedbyapenaltyNA
ChargedbeforethecourtsNA
2,07
1,04
0,20
0,59
ReceivedNA
DiscontinuedNA
ConcludedbyapenaltyNA
ChargedbeforethecourtsNA
189,65
74,55
16,07
51,61
Note:Therearedifferentmethodologiesoncalculatingnumberofcasesinprosecutionstatisticsbyeventorbyperpetrator.CEPEJcollects
datapercase(event)butsomecountriespresentitbyperpetrator.
Doesthejudicialsystemprovideforcourt-relatedmediation
procedures?
464
Mandatorymediationbeforegoingtocourt
Mandatorymediationorderedbyajudge
3614
2921
AlternativedisputeresolutionArbitration
Conciliation
Mediation(otherthanjudicial
mediation)
OtherADR
482
1337
464
3119
CZECHREPUBLIC
MemberState/EntityProfile:CzechRepublic
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
Exchangerate25,73Avggrossannualsalary14365,00GDPpercapita19489,00Population10649800,00
Professionaljudges28.4
Non-judgestaff92.6
Prosecutors11.6
Non-prosecutorstaff13.8
Lawyers105.0
17,7
60,9
11,2
14,9
123,0
HumanResources
(per100000inhabitants)
JudicialSystem57.0€
61,30€
FinancialResources
InEuros,perinhabitant
↳Courts46.1€
↳LegalAid2.0€
↳ProsecutionServices10.9€
40,79€
2,67€
11,78€
CourtTaxes4.2€
7,67€
Judges
Prosecutors
5,5
2,4
4,7
2,2
Salariesofjudgesandprosecutors
Ratiowithaverageannualsalaryatthebeginingandtheendofcarreer
Case-lawofthehighercourt/sLegaltextsOtherdocuments
www.nsoud.czwww.mvcr.czwww.justice.cz
Judiciaryrelatedwebsites
RecruitmentandpromotionofjudgesRecruitmentandpromotionofprosecutorsICTinjudiciary
(indexfrom0to10)
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
only
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-judgesonly
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
andnon-judges
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitment
ofjudges
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:
Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
446
455
437
1832
1139
1139
2030
1832
2030
3614
464
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsandnon-prosecutors
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitmentof
prosecutors
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
3416
464
1733
1535
464
464
2129
1238
1634
3119
49
0246810
DeploymentrateCIVIL6,4
CRIMINAL6,8
ADMIN5,6
Communication
withcourts
CIVIL6,9
CRIMINAL8,0
ADMIN6,2
Courtsandcase
management
CIVIL5,4
CRIMINAL5,4
ADMIN5,4
DecisionsupportCIVIL7,9
CRIMINAL7,7
ADMIN4,1
6,5
5,8
6,0
5,8
4,1
5,4
7,5
7,5
7,4
6,7
7,1
6,7
Page27
MemberState/EntityProfile:CzechRepublic
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
CEPEJefficiencyIndicators
ClearanceRate(CR)=(ResolvedCases/IncomingCases)*100|DispositionTime(DT)=(PendingCases/ResolvedCases)*365
IncomingCases=Allnewcasesatthatinstancewithintheyear|ResolvedCases=Casesfinalisedatthatinstancewithintheyear|PendingCases=UnresolvedCasesonthe31stofDecember
ClearanceRate
Civilcases1stInstance101.6%
2ndInstance101.7%
HighestInstance110.0%
Criminal
cases
1stInstance100.8%
2ndInstance100.5%
HighestInstance98.7%
Administrat
ivecases
1stInstance88.0%
2ndInstanceNAP
HighestInstance84.9%
1,01
1,02
0,99
1,00
0,99
0,98
1,00
0,97
0,98
DispositionTime
148days
74days
166days
65days
26days
44days
412days
NAP
261days
200,57
140,51
207,44
121,88
103,62
114,16
241,36
208,57
228,10
IncomingCases/100inhabitants
3.251
0.554
0.045
0.696
0.230
0.015
0.111
NAP
0.039
2,23
0,23
0,05
1,62
0,16
0,02
0,33
0,10
0,04
ResolvedCases/100inhabitants
3.303
0.563
0.049
0.701
0.231
0.015
0.098
NAP
0.033
2,14
0,24
0,05
1,58
0,15
0,02
0,35
0,11
0,03
PendingCases/100inhabitants
1.344
0.115
0.023
0.126
0.017
0.002
0.111
NAP
0.024
Prosecutioncasesper100inhabitantProsecutioncasesperprosecutorCourtrelatedmediation
Received2.00
Discontinued1.04
Concludedbyapenalty0.03
Chargedbeforethecourts0.59
2,07
1,04
0,20
0,59
Received171.9
Discontinued89.7
Concludedbyapenalty2.5
Chargedbeforethecourts51.0
189,65
74,55
16,07
51,61
Note:Therearedifferentmethodologiesoncalculatingnumberofcasesinprosecutionstatisticsbyeventorbyperpetrator.CEPEJcollects
datapercase(event)butsomecountriespresentitbyperpetrator.
Doesthejudicialsystemprovideforcourt-relatedmediation
procedures?
464
Mandatorymediationbeforegoingtocourt
Mandatorymediationorderedbyajudge
3614
2921
AlternativedisputeresolutionArbitration
Conciliation
Mediation(otherthanjudicial
mediation)
OtherADR
482
1337
464
3119
DENMARK
MemberState/EntityProfile:Denmark
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
Exchangerate7,47Avggrossannualsalary38035,00GDPpercapita51280,00Population5806081,00
Professionaljudges6.5
Non-judgestaff28.5
Prosecutors11.6
Non-prosecutorstaff7.9
Lawyers113.0
17,7
60,9
11,2
14,9
123,0
HumanResources
(per100000inhabitants)
JudicialSystem82.7€
61,30€
FinancialResources
InEuros,perinhabitant
↳Courts44.0€
↳LegalAid19.4€
↳ProsecutionServices19.4€
40,79€
2,67€
11,78€
CourtTaxes10.0€
7,67€
Judges
Prosecutors
5,9
3,4
2,4
1,4
Salariesofjudgesandprosecutors
Ratiowithaverageannualsalaryatthebeginingandtheendofcarreer
Case-lawofthehighercourt/sLegaltextsOtherdocuments
www.retsinformation.dkhttp://www.hoejesteret.dk/hoejesteret/nyheder/Afgorelser/Pages/default.aspxhttp://www.domstol.dk/Selvbetjening/blanketter/Pages/blanketter.aspx
Judiciaryrelatedwebsites
RecruitmentandpromotionofjudgesRecruitmentandpromotionofprosecutorsICTinjudiciary
(indexfrom0to10)
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
only
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-judgesonly
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
andnon-judges
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitment
ofjudges
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:
Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
446
455
437
1832
1139
1139
2030
1832
2030
3614
464
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsandnon-prosecutors
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitmentof
prosecutors
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
3416
464
1733
1535
464
464
2129
1238
1634
3119
49
0246810
DeploymentrateCIVIL7,3
CRIMINAL5,0
ADMIN3,3
Communication
withcourts
CIVIL9,0
CRIMINAL5,1
ADMIN3,0
Courtsandcase
management
CIVIL6,0
CRIMINAL5,3
ADMIN3,9
DecisionsupportCIVIL5,6
CRIMINAL4,2
ADMIN2,7
6,5
5,8
6,0
5,8
4,1
5,4
7,5
7,5
7,4
6,7
7,1
6,7
Page29
MemberState/EntityProfile:Denmark
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
CEPEJefficiencyIndicators
ClearanceRate(CR)=(ResolvedCases/IncomingCases)*100|DispositionTime(DT)=(PendingCases/ResolvedCases)*365
IncomingCases=Allnewcasesatthatinstancewithintheyear|ResolvedCases=Casesfinalisedatthatinstancewithintheyear|PendingCases=UnresolvedCasesonthe31stofDecember
ClearanceRate
Civilcases1stInstance95.0%
2ndInstance95.8%
HighestInstance91.8%
Criminal
cases
1stInstance99.0%
2ndInstance97.3%
HighestInstance68.0%
Administrat
ivecases
1stInstanceNAP
2ndInstanceNAP
HighestInstanceNAP
1,01
1,02
0,99
1,00
0,99
0,98
1,00
0,97
0,98
DispositionTime
206days
168days
187days
41days
103days
236days
NAP
NAP
NAP
200,57
140,51
207,44
121,88
103,62
114,16
241,36
208,57
228,10
IncomingCases/100inhabitants
0.721
0.083
0.004
2.886
0.107
0.001
NAP
NAP
NAP
2,23
0,23
0,05
1,62
0,16
0,02
0,33
0,10
0,04
ResolvedCases/100inhabitants
0.685
0.080
0.004
2.857
0.104
0.001
NAP
NAP
NAP
2,14
0,24
0,05
1,58
0,15
0,02
0,35
0,11
0,03
PendingCases/100inhabitants
0.388
0.037
0.002
0.322
0.030
0.001
NAP
NAP
NAP
Prosecutioncasesper100inhabitantProsecutioncasesperprosecutorCourtrelatedmediation
Received8.15
Discontinued4.32
Concludedbyapenalty1.02
Chargedbeforethecourts2.81
2,07
1,04
0,20
0,59
Received705.2
Discontinued373.4
Concludedbyapenalty88.5
Chargedbeforethecourts243.3
189,65
74,55
16,07
51,61
Note:Therearedifferentmethodologiesoncalculatingnumberofcasesinprosecutionstatisticsbyeventorbyperpetrator.CEPEJcollects
datapercase(event)butsomecountriespresentitbyperpetrator.
Doesthejudicialsystemprovideforcourt-relatedmediation
procedures?
464
Mandatorymediationbeforegoingtocourt
Mandatorymediationorderedbyajudge
3614
2921
AlternativedisputeresolutionArbitration
Conciliation
Mediation(otherthanjudicial
mediation)
OtherADR
482
1337
464
3119
ESTONIA
MemberState/EntityProfile:Estonia
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
ExchangerateNAPAvggrossannualsalary15612,00GDPpercapita19737,00Population1319133,00
Professionaljudges17.7
Non-judgestaff62.1
Prosecutors12.8
Non-prosecutorstaff6.7
Lawyers78.9
17,7
60,9
11,2
14,9
123,0
HumanResources
(per100000inhabitants)
JudicialSystem48.6€
61,30€
FinancialResources
InEuros,perinhabitant
↳Courts35.7€
↳LegalAid3.1€
↳ProsecutionServices9.8€
40,79€
2,67€
11,78€
CourtTaxes14.2€
7,67€
Judges
Prosecutors
3,7
2,8
3,7
1,6
Salariesofjudgesandprosecutors
Ratiowithaverageannualsalaryatthebeginingandtheendofcarreer
Case-lawofthehighercourt/sLegaltextsOtherdocuments
riigiteataja.eeriigiteataja.eee-toimik.ee,kohus.ee
Judiciaryrelatedwebsites
RecruitmentandpromotionofjudgesRecruitmentandpromotionofprosecutorsICTinjudiciary
(indexfrom0to10)
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
only
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-judgesonly
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
andnon-judges
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitment
ofjudges
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:
Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
446
455
437
1832
1139
1139
2030
1832
2030
3614
464
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsandnon-prosecutors
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitmentof
prosecutors
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
3416
464
1733
1535
464
464
2129
1238
1634
3119
49
0246810
DeploymentrateCIVIL9,8
CRIMINAL9,6
ADMIN9,6
Communication
withcourts
CIVIL10,2
CRIMINAL9,6
ADMIN9,8
Courtsandcase
management
CIVIL10,0
CRIMINAL10,0
ADMIN10,0
DecisionsupportCIVIL7,8
CRIMINAL8,1
ADMIN7,8
6,5
5,8
6,0
5,8
4,1
5,4
7,5
7,5
7,4
6,7
7,1
6,7
Page31
MemberState/EntityProfile:Estonia
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
CEPEJefficiencyIndicators
ClearanceRate(CR)=(ResolvedCases/IncomingCases)*100|DispositionTime(DT)=(PendingCases/ResolvedCases)*365
IncomingCases=Allnewcasesatthatinstancewithintheyear|ResolvedCases=Casesfinalisedatthatinstancewithintheyear|PendingCases=UnresolvedCasesonthe31stofDecember
ClearanceRate
Civilcases1stInstance100.6%
2ndInstance97.2%
HighestInstance98.1%
Criminal
cases
1stInstance97.8%
2ndInstance100.8%
HighestInstance90.8%
Administrat
ivecases
1stInstance100.0%
2ndInstance111.0%
HighestInstance95.0%
1,01
1,02
0,99
1,00
0,99
0,98
1,00
0,97
0,98
DispositionTime
143days
119days
65days
35days
20days
68days
118days
81days
206days
200,57
140,51
207,44
121,88
103,62
114,16
241,36
208,57
228,10
IncomingCases/100inhabitants
1.166
0.146
0.012
1.696
0.156
0.005
0.188
0.099
0.006
2,23
0,23
0,05
1,62
0,16
0,02
0,33
0,10
0,04
ResolvedCases/100inhabitants
1.173
0.142
0.012
1.657
0.157
0.004
0.188
0.110
0.006
2,14
0,24
0,05
1,58
0,15
0,02
0,35
0,11
0,03
PendingCases/100inhabitants
0.460
0.046
0.002
0.161
0.009
0.001
0.061
0.024
0.003
Prosecutioncasesper100inhabitantProsecutioncasesperprosecutorCourtrelatedmediation
Received2.06
Discontinued0.28
ConcludedbyapenaltyNA
Chargedbeforethecourts0.48
2,07
1,04
0,20
0,59
Received160.5
Discontinued21.9
ConcludedbyapenaltyNA
Chargedbeforethecourts37.2
189,65
74,55
16,07
51,61
Note:Therearedifferentmethodologiesoncalculatingnumberofcasesinprosecutionstatisticsbyeventorbyperpetrator.CEPEJcollects
datapercase(event)butsomecountriespresentitbyperpetrator.
Doesthejudicialsystemprovideforcourt-relatedmediation
procedures?
464
Mandatorymediationbeforegoingtocourt
Mandatorymediationorderedbyajudge
3614
2921
AlternativedisputeresolutionArbitration
Conciliation
Mediation(otherthanjudicial
mediation)
OtherADR
482
1337
464
3119
FINLAND
MemberState/EntityProfile:Finland
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
ExchangerateNAPAvggrossannualsalary41580,00GDPpercapita42340,00Population5521773,00
Professionaljudges19.6
Non-judgestaff38.6
Prosecutors7.1
Non-prosecutorstaff3.0
Lawyers71.8
17,7
60,9
11,2
14,9
123,0
HumanResources
(per100000inhabitants)
JudicialSystem75.0€
61,30€
FinancialResources
InEuros,perinhabitant
↳Courts50.3€
↳LegalAid16.5€
↳ProsecutionServices8.2€
40,79€
2,67€
11,78€
CourtTaxes8.2€
7,67€
Judges
Prosecutors
3,2
1,5
1,2
Salariesofjudgesandprosecutors
Ratiowithaverageannualsalaryatthebeginingandtheendofcarreer
Case-lawofthehighercourt/sLegaltextsOtherdocuments
http://www.finlex.fi,http://korkeinoikeus.fi/fi/index/ennakkopaatokset.htmlhttp://www.finlex.fihttp://oikeus.fi/fi/index/lomakkeet.html,http://www.suomi.fi/etusivu/
Judiciaryrelatedwebsites
RecruitmentandpromotionofjudgesRecruitmentandpromotionofprosecutorsICTinjudiciary
(indexfrom0to10)
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
only
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-judgesonly
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
andnon-judges
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitment
ofjudges
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:
Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
446
455
437
1832
1139
1139
2030
1832
2030
3614
464
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsandnon-prosecutors
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitmentof
prosecutors
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
3416
464
1733
1535
464
464
2129
1238
1634
3119
49
0246810
DeploymentrateCIVIL8,3
CRIMINAL8,6
ADMIN8,9
Communication
withcourts
CIVIL8,7
CRIMINAL9,4
ADMIN9,6
Courtsandcase
management
CIVIL8,2
CRIMINAL8,2
ADMIN8,9
DecisionsupportCIVIL6,7
CRIMINAL7,1
ADMIN6,7
6,5
5,8
6,0
5,8
4,1
5,4
7,5
7,5
7,4
6,7
7,1
6,7
Page33
MemberState/EntityProfile:Finland
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
CEPEJefficiencyIndicators
ClearanceRate(CR)=(ResolvedCases/IncomingCases)*100|DispositionTime(DT)=(PendingCases/ResolvedCases)*365
IncomingCases=Allnewcasesatthatinstancewithintheyear|ResolvedCases=Casesfinalisedatthatinstancewithintheyear|PendingCases=UnresolvedCasesonthe31stofDecember
ClearanceRate
Civilcases1stInstance102.2%
2ndInstance106.8%
HighestInstance108.1%
Criminal
cases
1stInstance95.4%
2ndInstance94.5%
HighestInstance118.4%
Administrat
ivecases
1stInstance112.3%
2ndInstanceNAP
HighestInstance95.2%
1,01
1,02
0,99
1,00
0,99
0,98
1,00
0,97
0,98
DispositionTime
273days
176days
130days
139days
182days
87days
234days
NAP
207days
200,57
140,51
207,44
121,88
103,62
114,16
241,36
208,57
228,10
IncomingCases/100inhabitants
0.149
0.039
0.014
1.063
0.101
0.016
0.445
NAP
0.112
2,23
0,23
0,05
1,62
0,16
0,02
0,33
0,10
0,04
ResolvedCases/100inhabitants
0.153
0.042
0.015
1.014
0.095
0.019
0.500
NAP
0.107
2,14
0,24
0,05
1,58
0,15
0,02
0,35
0,11
0,03
PendingCases/100inhabitants
0.114
0.020
0.005
0.387
0.048
0.005
0.321
NAP
0.061
Prosecutioncasesper100inhabitantProsecutioncasesperprosecutorCourtrelatedmediation
Received1.65
Discontinued0.53
Concludedbyapenalty0.00
Chargedbeforethecourts1.06
2,07
1,04
0,20
0,59
Received231.7
Discontinued74.6
Concludedbyapenalty0.1
Chargedbeforethecourts148.7
189,65
74,55
16,07
51,61
Note:Therearedifferentmethodologiesoncalculatingnumberofcasesinprosecutionstatisticsbyeventorbyperpetrator.CEPEJcollects
datapercase(event)butsomecountriespresentitbyperpetrator.
Doesthejudicialsystemprovideforcourt-relatedmediation
procedures?
464
Mandatorymediationbeforegoingtocourt
Mandatorymediationorderedbyajudge
3614
2921
AlternativedisputeresolutionArbitration
Conciliation
Mediation(otherthanjudicial
mediation)
OtherADR
482
1337
464
3119
FRANCE
MemberState/EntityProfile:France
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
ExchangerateNAPAvggrossannualsalary35763,00GDPpercapita34978,00Population66992699,00
Professionaljudges10.9
Non-judgestaff34.1
Prosecutors3.0
Non-prosecutorstaffNA
Lawyers99.9
17,7
60,9
11,2
14,9
123,0
HumanResources
(per100000inhabitants)
JudicialSystem69.5€
61,30€
FinancialResources
InEuros,perinhabitant
↳Courts49.9€
↳LegalAid7.2€
↳ProsecutionServices12.4€
40,79€
2,67€
11,78€
CourtTaxes0.4€
7,67€
Judges
Prosecutors
3,4
1,3
3,4
1,3
Salariesofjudgesandprosecutors
Ratiowithaverageannualsalaryatthebeginingandtheendofcarreer
Case-lawofthehighercourt/sLegaltextsOtherdocuments
https://www.service-public.frhttps://www.justice.gouv.frhttps://www.justice.frhttps://www.pr..https://www.legifrance.gouv.frhttps://www.conseil-constitutionnel.frhttps://www.conseil-etat...https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr
Judiciaryrelatedwebsites
RecruitmentandpromotionofjudgesRecruitmentandpromotionofprosecutorsICTinjudiciary
(indexfrom0to10)
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
only
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-judgesonly
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
andnon-judges
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitment
ofjudges
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:
Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
446
455
437
1832
1139
1139
2030
1832
2030
3614
464
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsandnon-prosecutors
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitmentof
prosecutors
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
3416
464
1733
1535
464
464
2129
1238
1634
3119
49
0246810
DeploymentrateCIVIL4,6
CRIMINAL4,2
ADMIN7,2
Communication
withcourts
CIVIL1,9
CRIMINAL0,6
ADMIN7,1
Courtsandcase
management
CIVIL8,2
CRIMINAL7,5
ADMIN7,5
DecisionsupportCIVIL2,2
CRIMINAL5,6
ADMIN6,0
6,5
5,8
6,0
5,8
4,1
5,4
7,5
7,5
7,4
6,7
7,1
6,7
Page35
MemberState/EntityProfile:France
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
CEPEJefficiencyIndicators
ClearanceRate(CR)=(ResolvedCases/IncomingCases)*100|DispositionTime(DT)=(PendingCases/ResolvedCases)*365
IncomingCases=Allnewcasesatthatinstancewithintheyear|ResolvedCases=Casesfinalisedatthatinstancewithintheyear|PendingCases=UnresolvedCasesonthe31stofDecember
ClearanceRate
Civilcases1stInstance95.8%
2ndInstance104.7%
HighestInstance123.1%
Criminal
cases
1stInstance100.0%
2ndInstance95.0%
HighestInstance108.3%
Administrat
ivecases
1stInstance98.4%
2ndInstance97.3%
HighestInstance100.2%
1,01
1,02
0,99
1,00
0,99
0,98
1,00
0,97
0,98
DispositionTime
420days
465days
336days
NA
309days
141days
285days
327days
200days
200,57
140,51
207,44
121,88
103,62
114,16
241,36
208,57
228,10
IncomingCases/100inhabitants
2.236
0.290
0.026
1.458
0.070
0.010
0.318
0.050
0.014
2,23
0,23
0,05
1,62
0,16
0,02
0,33
0,10
0,04
ResolvedCases/100inhabitants
2.141
0.303
0.032
1.458
0.066
0.011
0.313
0.049
0.014
2,14
0,24
0,05
1,58
0,15
0,02
0,35
0,11
0,03
PendingCases/100inhabitants
2.465
0.387
0.030
NA
0.056
0.004
0.245
0.044
0.008
Prosecutioncasesper100inhabitantProsecutioncasesperprosecutorCourtrelatedmediation
Received6.64
Discontinued4.54
Concludedbyapenalty0.81
Chargedbeforethecourts0.91
2,07
1,04
0,20
0,59
Received2201.0
Discontinued1503.0
Concludedbyapenalty267.4
Chargedbeforethecourts301.9
189,65
74,55
16,07
51,61
Note:Therearedifferentmethodologiesoncalculatingnumberofcasesinprosecutionstatisticsbyeventorbyperpetrator.CEPEJcollects
datapercase(event)butsomecountriespresentitbyperpetrator.
Doesthejudicialsystemprovideforcourt-relatedmediation
procedures?
464
Mandatorymediationbeforegoingtocourt
Mandatorymediationorderedbyajudge
3614
2921
AlternativedisputeresolutionArbitration
Conciliation
Mediation(otherthanjudicial
mediation)
OtherADR
482
1337
464
3119
GEORGIA
MemberState/EntityProfile:Georgia
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
Exchangerate3,06AvggrossannualsalaryNAGDPpercapita3587,00Population3723500,00
Professionaljudges8.2
Non-judgestaff40.4
Prosecutors11.3
Non-prosecutorstaff6.2
Lawyers123.0
17,7
60,9
11,2
14,9
123,0
HumanResources
(per100000inhabitants)
JudicialSystem10.1€
61,30€
FinancialResources
InEuros,perinhabitant
↳Courts6.6€
↳LegalAid0.5€
↳ProsecutionServices3.0€
40,79€
2,67€
11,78€
CourtTaxes1.5€
7,67€
Judges
Prosecutors
Salariesofjudgesandprosecutors
Ratiowithaverageannualsalaryatthebeginingandtheendofcarreer
Case-lawofthehighercourt/sLegaltextsOtherdocuments
www.supremecourt.gewww.matsne.gov.gewww.hcoj.gov.ge;www.ecourt.ge
Judiciaryrelatedwebsites
RecruitmentandpromotionofjudgesRecruitmentandpromotionofprosecutorsICTinjudiciary
(indexfrom0to10)
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
only
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-judgesonly
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
andnon-judges
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitment
ofjudges
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:
Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
446
455
437
1832
1139
1139
2030
1832
2030
3614
464
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsandnon-prosecutors
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitmentof
prosecutors
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
3416
464
1733
1535
464
464
2129
1238
1634
3119
49
0246810
DeploymentrateCIVIL7,4
CRIMINAL6,3
ADMIN6,3
Communication
withcourts
CIVIL8,7
CRIMINAL6,2
ADMIN6,3
Courtsandcase
management
CIVIL6,8
CRIMINAL6,8
ADMIN6,8
DecisionsupportCIVIL4,4
CRIMINAL5,2
ADMIN4,4
6,5
5,8
6,0
5,8
4,1
5,4
7,5
7,5
7,4
6,7
7,1
6,7
Page37
MemberState/EntityProfile:Georgia
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
CEPEJefficiencyIndicators
ClearanceRate(CR)=(ResolvedCases/IncomingCases)*100|DispositionTime(DT)=(PendingCases/ResolvedCases)*365
IncomingCases=Allnewcasesatthatinstancewithintheyear|ResolvedCases=Casesfinalisedatthatinstancewithintheyear|PendingCases=UnresolvedCasesonthe31stofDecember
ClearanceRate
Civilcases1stInstance91.1%
2ndInstance97.7%
HighestInstance79.0%
Criminal
cases
1stInstance101.3%
2ndInstance95.1%
HighestInstance88.2%
Administrat
ivecases
1stInstance94.4%
2ndInstance100.3%
HighestInstance78.1%
1,01
1,02
0,99
1,00
0,99
0,98
1,00
0,97
0,98
DispositionTime
273days
143days
203days
63days
97days
200days
185days
157days
231days
200,57
140,51
207,44
121,88
103,62
114,16
241,36
208,57
228,10
IncomingCases/100inhabitants
1.939
0.172
0.058
0.395
0.068
0.022
0.326
0.110
0.044
2,23
0,23
0,05
1,62
0,16
0,02
0,33
0,10
0,04
ResolvedCases/100inhabitants
1.766
0.168
0.046
0.400
0.065
0.020
0.308
0.110
0.034
2,14
0,24
0,05
1,58
0,15
0,02
0,35
0,11
0,03
PendingCases/100inhabitants
1.324
0.066
0.026
0.070
0.017
0.011
0.156
0.048
0.022
Prosecutioncasesper100inhabitantProsecutioncasesperprosecutorCourtrelatedmediation
Received1.85
Discontinued0.73
Concludedbyapenalty0.06
Chargedbeforethecourts0.39
2,07
1,04
0,20
0,59
Received164.0
Discontinued64.5
Concludedbyapenalty5.7
Chargedbeforethecourts35.0
189,65
74,55
16,07
51,61
Note:Therearedifferentmethodologiesoncalculatingnumberofcasesinprosecutionstatisticsbyeventorbyperpetrator.CEPEJcollects
datapercase(event)butsomecountriespresentitbyperpetrator.
Doesthejudicialsystemprovideforcourt-relatedmediation
procedures?
464
Mandatorymediationbeforegoingtocourt
Mandatorymediationorderedbyajudge
3614
2921
AlternativedisputeresolutionArbitration
Conciliation
Mediation(otherthanjudicial
mediation)
OtherADR
482
1337
464
3119
GERMANY
MemberState/EntityProfile:Germany
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
ExchangerateNAPAvggrossannualsalary53688,00GDPpercapita40852,00Population83019200,00
Professionaljudges24.5
Non-judgestaff65.1
Prosecutors7.1
Non-prosecutorstaff14.5
Lawyers198.9
17,7
60,9
11,2
14,9
123,0
HumanResources
(per100000inhabitants)
JudicialSystem131.2€
61,30€
FinancialResources
InEuros,perinhabitant
↳CourtsNA€
↳LegalAid7.8€
↳ProsecutionServicesNA€
40,79€
2,67€
11,78€
CourtTaxes52.1€
7,67€
Judges
Prosecutors
1,6
0,9
1,6
0,9
Salariesofjudgesandprosecutors
Ratiowithaverageannualsalaryatthebeginingandtheendofcarreer
Case-lawofthehighercourt/sLegaltextsOtherdocuments
www.rechtsprechung-im-internet.de,www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de,www.bundesgeric..www.justiz.de/bundlaender/index.php,http://www.justiz-bw.de,http://gerichtsentscheidunge..regardingfederallaw:www.gesetze-im-internet.de;regardingthelawofthestates("Bundes..
Judiciaryrelatedwebsites
RecruitmentandpromotionofjudgesRecruitmentandpromotionofprosecutorsICTinjudiciary
(indexfrom0to10)
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
only
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-judgesonly
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
andnon-judges
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitment
ofjudges
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:
Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
446
455
437
1832
1139
1139
2030
1832
2030
3614
464
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsandnon-prosecutors
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitmentof
prosecutors
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
3416
464
1733
1535
464
464
2129
1238
1634
3119
49
0246810
DeploymentrateCIVIL8,3
CRIMINAL8,3
ADMIN8,0
Communication
withcourts
CIVIL9,8
CRIMINAL9,8
ADMIN9,3
Courtsandcase
management
CIVIL6,5
CRIMINAL6,5
ADMIN6,5
DecisionsupportCIVIL8,7
CRIMINAL8,9
ADMIN8,7
6,5
5,8
6,0
5,8
4,1
5,4
7,5
7,5
7,4
6,7
7,1
6,7
Page39
MemberState/EntityProfile:Germany
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
CEPEJefficiencyIndicators
ClearanceRate(CR)=(ResolvedCases/IncomingCases)*100|DispositionTime(DT)=(PendingCases/ResolvedCases)*365
IncomingCases=Allnewcasesatthatinstancewithintheyear|ResolvedCases=Casesfinalisedatthatinstancewithintheyear|PendingCases=UnresolvedCasesonthe31stofDecember
ClearanceRate
Civilcases1stInstance97.2%
2ndInstance98.9%
HighestInstanceNA
Criminal
cases
1stInstanceNA
2ndInstanceNA
HighestInstance95.2%
Administrat
ivecases
1stInstance97.1%
2ndInstance93.6%
HighestInstance97.7%
1,01
1,02
0,99
1,00
0,99
0,98
1,00
0,97
0,98
DispositionTime
219days
262days
NA
NA
NA
106days
435days
442days
228days
200,57
140,51
207,44
121,88
103,62
114,16
241,36
208,57
228,10
IncomingCases/100inhabitants
1.520
0.112
NA
NA
NA
0.004
0.901
0.061
0.007
2,23
0,23
0,05
1,62
0,16
0,02
0,33
0,10
0,04
ResolvedCases/100inhabitants
1.478
0.111
NA
1.435
0.076
0.004
0.875
0.057
0.007
2,14
0,24
0,05
1,58
0,15
0,02
0,35
0,11
0,03
PendingCases/100inhabitants
0.890
0.080
NA
NA
NA
0.001
1.044
0.069
0.004
Prosecutioncasesper100inhabitantProsecutioncasesperprosecutorCourtrelatedmediation
Received5.92
Discontinued3.37
Concludedbyapenalty0.20
Chargedbeforethecourts1.19
2,07
1,04
0,20
0,59
Received836.2
Discontinued475.2
Concludedbyapenalty28.5
Chargedbeforethecourts167.6
189,65
74,55
16,07
51,61
Note:Therearedifferentmethodologiesoncalculatingnumberofcasesinprosecutionstatisticsbyeventorbyperpetrator.CEPEJcollects
datapercase(event)butsomecountriespresentitbyperpetrator.
Doesthejudicialsystemprovideforcourt-relatedmediation
procedures?
464
Mandatorymediationbeforegoingtocourt
Mandatorymediationorderedbyajudge
3614
2921
AlternativedisputeresolutionArbitration
Conciliation
Mediation(otherthanjudicial
mediation)
OtherADR
482
1337
464
3119
GREECE
MemberState/EntityProfile:Greece
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
ExchangerateNAPAvggrossannualsalaryNAGDPpercapita16736,00Population10741165,00
Professionaljudges26.8
Non-judgestaff38.9
Prosecutors5.4
Non-prosecutorstaff15.0
Lawyers399.9
17,7
60,9
11,2
14,9
123,0
HumanResources
(per100000inhabitants)
JudicialSystem52.1€
61,30€
FinancialResources
InEuros,perinhabitant
↳CourtsNA€
↳LegalAid0.7€
↳ProsecutionServicesNA€
40,79€
2,67€
11,78€
CourtTaxes12.0€
7,67€
Judges
Prosecutors
Salariesofjudgesandprosecutors
Ratiowithaverageannualsalaryatthebeginingandtheendofcarreer
Case-lawofthehighercourt/sLegaltextsOtherdocuments
http://www.ministryofjustice.gr/site/el/ΑΡΧΙΚΗ.aspxhttp://www.areiospagos.gr/,http://www.adjustice.gr/http://www.adjustice.gr/,http://www.nsk.gr/
Judiciaryrelatedwebsites
RecruitmentandpromotionofjudgesRecruitmentandpromotionofprosecutorsICTinjudiciary
(indexfrom0to10)
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
only
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-judgesonly
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
andnon-judges
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitment
ofjudges
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:
Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
446
455
437
1832
1139
1139
2030
1832
2030
3614
464
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsandnon-prosecutors
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitmentof
prosecutors
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
3416
464
1733
1535
464
464
2129
1238
1634
3119
49
0246810
DeploymentrateCIVIL4,4
CRIMINAL3,8
ADMIN5,5
Communication
withcourts
CIVIL4,6
CRIMINAL3,5
ADMIN3,8
Courtsandcase
management
CIVIL4,9
CRIMINAL4,9
ADMIN7,8
DecisionsupportCIVIL2,2
CRIMINAL1,0
ADMIN3,3
6,5
5,8
6,0
5,8
4,1
5,4
7,5
7,5
7,4
6,7
7,1
6,7
Page41
MemberState/EntityProfile:Greece
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
CEPEJefficiencyIndicators
ClearanceRate(CR)=(ResolvedCases/IncomingCases)*100|DispositionTime(DT)=(PendingCases/ResolvedCases)*365
IncomingCases=Allnewcasesatthatinstancewithintheyear|ResolvedCases=Casesfinalisedatthatinstancewithintheyear|PendingCases=UnresolvedCasesonthe31stofDecember
ClearanceRate
Civilcases1stInstance86.3%
2ndInstance97.0%
HighestInstance95.4%
Criminal
cases
1stInstance59.0%
2ndInstance58.2%
HighestInstance138.8%
Administrat
ivecases
1stInstance163.5%
2ndInstance114.3%
HighestInstance106.6%
1,01
1,02
0,99
1,00
0,99
0,98
1,00
0,97
0,98
DispositionTime
559days
662days
331days
NA
NA
5days
601days
563days
1264days
200,57
140,51
207,44
121,88
103,62
114,16
241,36
208,57
228,10
IncomingCases/100inhabitants
1.987
0.209
0.022
4.364
0.529
0.015
0.562
0.178
0.034
2,23
0,23
0,05
1,62
0,16
0,02
0,33
0,10
0,04
ResolvedCases/100inhabitants
1.714
0.203
0.021
2.576
0.308
0.021
0.918
0.203
0.036
2,14
0,24
0,05
1,58
0,15
0,02
0,35
0,11
0,03
PendingCases/100inhabitants
2.627
0.368
0.019
NA
NA
0.000
1.513
0.313
0.125
Prosecutioncasesper100inhabitantProsecutioncasesperprosecutorCourtrelatedmediation
ReceivedNA
DiscontinuedNA
ConcludedbyapenaltyNA
ChargedbeforethecourtsNA
2,07
1,04
0,20
0,59
ReceivedNA
DiscontinuedNA
ConcludedbyapenaltyNA
ChargedbeforethecourtsNA
189,65
74,55
16,07
51,61
Note:Therearedifferentmethodologiesoncalculatingnumberofcasesinprosecutionstatisticsbyeventorbyperpetrator.CEPEJcollects
datapercase(event)butsomecountriespresentitbyperpetrator.
Doesthejudicialsystemprovideforcourt-relatedmediation
procedures?
464
Mandatorymediationbeforegoingtocourt
Mandatorymediationorderedbyajudge
3614
2921
AlternativedisputeresolutionArbitration
Conciliation
Mediation(otherthanjudicial
mediation)
OtherADR
482
1337
464
3119
HUNGARY
MemberState/EntityProfile:Hungary
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
Exchangerate322,16Avggrossannualsalary12288,00GDPpercapita12500,00Population9591495,00
Professionaljudges30.2
Non-judgestaff88.9
Prosecutors19.7
Non-prosecutorstaff26.0
Lawyers132.6
17,7
60,9
11,2
14,9
123,0
HumanResources
(per100000inhabitants)
JudicialSystem56.5€
61,30€
FinancialResources
InEuros,perinhabitant
↳Courts40.8€
↳LegalAid0.1€
↳ProsecutionServices15.7€
40,79€
2,67€
11,78€
CourtTaxesNA€
7,67€
Judges
Prosecutors
3,4
1,8
3,2
1,6
Salariesofjudgesandprosecutors
Ratiowithaverageannualsalaryatthebeginingandtheendofcarreer
Case-lawofthehighercourt/sLegaltextsOtherdocuments
www.birosag.hu;http://www.birosag.hu/ugyfelkapcsolati-portal/anonimhatarozatok-tarahttp..http://njt.hu/http://igazsagugyihivatal.gov.hu/download/4/c9/11000/aldozatsegito_%20tajek..http://igazsagugyihivatal.gov.hu/download/2/c9/11000/A%2BB_%C3%A9krelemnyomtatv..
Judiciaryrelatedwebsites
RecruitmentandpromotionofjudgesRecruitmentandpromotionofprosecutorsICTinjudiciary
(indexfrom0to10)
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
only
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-judgesonly
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
andnon-judges
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitment
ofjudges
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:
Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
446
455
437
1832
1139
1139
2030
1832
2030
3614
464
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsandnon-prosecutors
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitmentof
prosecutors
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
3416
464
1733
1535
464
464
2129
1238
1634
3119
49
0246810
DeploymentrateCIVIL9,1
CRIMINAL9,9
ADMIN8,9
Communication
withcourts
CIVIL9,3
CRIMINAL11,1
ADMIN8,8
Courtsandcase
management
CIVIL9,1
CRIMINAL9,1
ADMIN9,1
DecisionsupportCIVIL8,2
CRIMINAL8,8
ADMIN8,2
6,5
5,8
6,0
5,8
4,1
5,4
7,5
7,5
7,4
6,7
7,1
6,7
Page43
MemberState/EntityProfile:Hungary
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
CEPEJefficiencyIndicators
ClearanceRate(CR)=(ResolvedCases/IncomingCases)*100|DispositionTime(DT)=(PendingCases/ResolvedCases)*365
IncomingCases=Allnewcasesatthatinstancewithintheyear|ResolvedCases=Casesfinalisedatthatinstancewithintheyear|PendingCases=UnresolvedCasesonthe31stofDecember
ClearanceRate
Civilcases1stInstance116.3%
2ndInstance105.6%
HighestInstance109.8%
Criminal
cases
1stInstance101.0%
2ndInstance100.2%
HighestInstance103.7%
Administrat
ivecases
1stInstance101.7%
2ndInstance97.2%
HighestInstance89.9%
1,01
1,02
0,99
1,00
0,99
0,98
1,00
0,97
0,98
DispositionTime
151days
112days
228days
58days
64days
60days
108days
91days
228days
200,57
140,51
207,44
121,88
103,62
114,16
241,36
208,57
228,10
IncomingCases/100inhabitants
1.382
0.156
0.026
3.680
0.384
0.017
0.178
0.024
0.023
2,23
0,23
0,05
1,62
0,16
0,02
0,33
0,10
0,04
ResolvedCases/100inhabitants
1.607
0.165
0.029
3.718
0.384
0.018
0.181
0.023
0.020
2,14
0,24
0,05
1,58
0,15
0,02
0,35
0,11
0,03
PendingCases/100inhabitants
0.666
0.051
0.018
0.598
0.068
0.003
0.054
0.006
0.013
Prosecutioncasesper100inhabitantProsecutioncasesperprosecutorCourtrelatedmediation
Received1.97
Discontinued0.23
Concludedbyapenalty0.10
Chargedbeforethecourts1.63
2,07
1,04
0,20
0,59
Received100.1
Discontinued11.8
Concludedbyapenalty5.3
Chargedbeforethecourts83.0
189,65
74,55
16,07
51,61
Note:Therearedifferentmethodologiesoncalculatingnumberofcasesinprosecutionstatisticsbyeventorbyperpetrator.CEPEJcollects
datapercase(event)butsomecountriespresentitbyperpetrator.
Doesthejudicialsystemprovideforcourt-relatedmediation
procedures?
464
Mandatorymediationbeforegoingtocourt
Mandatorymediationorderedbyajudge
3614
2921
AlternativedisputeresolutionArbitration
Conciliation
Mediation(otherthanjudicial
mediation)
OtherADR
482
1337
464
3119
ICELAND
MemberState/EntityProfile:Iceland
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
Exchangerate133,40Avggrossannualsalary64858,00GDPpercapita21012,00Population356991,00
Professionaljudges18.2
Non-judgestaff21.0
Prosecutors19.6
Non-prosecutorstaffNA
Lawyers300.3
17,7
60,9
11,2
14,9
123,0
HumanResources
(per100000inhabitants)
JudicialSystem122.1€
61,30€
FinancialResources
InEuros,perinhabitant
↳Courts65.6€
↳LegalAid30.7€
↳ProsecutionServices25.8€
40,79€
2,67€
11,78€
CourtTaxes13.3€
7,67€
Judges
Prosecutors
2,5
2,0
2,0
Salariesofjudgesandprosecutors
Ratiowithaverageannualsalaryatthebeginingandtheendofcarreer
Case-lawofthehighercourt/sLegaltextsOtherdocuments
www.domstolar.is,www.landsrettur.isandhaestirettur.iswww.althingi.is/lagasafn/andwww.reglugerd.ishttps://www.stjornarradid.is/gogn/log-og-reglugerdir/,www.island.is,www.logbirtingablad.is..
Judiciaryrelatedwebsites
RecruitmentandpromotionofjudgesRecruitmentandpromotionofprosecutorsICTinjudiciary
(indexfrom0to10)
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
only
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-judgesonly
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
andnon-judges
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitment
ofjudges
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:
Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
446
455
437
1832
1139
1139
2030
1832
2030
3614
464
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsandnon-prosecutors
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitmentof
prosecutors
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
3416
464
1733
1535
464
464
2129
1238
1634
3119
49
0246810
DeploymentrateCIVIL6,9
CRIMINAL6,9
ADMIN6,6
Communication
withcourts
CIVIL4,9
CRIMINAL4,9
ADMIN4,3
Courtsandcase
management
CIVIL8,8
CRIMINAL8,8
ADMIN8,8
DecisionsupportCIVIL7,7
CRIMINAL8,0
ADMIN7,7
6,5
5,8
6,0
5,8
4,1
5,4
7,5
7,5
7,4
6,7
7,1
6,7
Page45
MemberState/EntityProfile:Iceland
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
CEPEJefficiencyIndicators
ClearanceRate(CR)=(ResolvedCases/IncomingCases)*100|DispositionTime(DT)=(PendingCases/ResolvedCases)*365
IncomingCases=Allnewcasesatthatinstancewithintheyear|ResolvedCases=Casesfinalisedatthatinstancewithintheyear|PendingCases=UnresolvedCasesonthe31stofDecember
ClearanceRate
Civilcases1stInstance54.0%
2ndInstanceNA
HighestInstanceNA
Criminal
cases
1stInstance92.8%
2ndInstance106.2%
HighestInstance60.0%
Administrat
ivecases
1stInstanceNAP
2ndInstanceNA
HighestInstanceNA
1,01
1,02
0,99
1,00
0,99
0,98
1,00
0,97
0,98
DispositionTime
NA
NA
NA
NA
244days
486days
NAP
NA
NA
200,57
140,51
207,44
121,88
103,62
114,16
241,36
208,57
228,10
IncomingCases/100inhabitants
5.817
NA
NA
1.117
0.027
0.001
NAP
NA
NA
2,23
0,23
0,05
1,62
0,16
0,02
0,33
0,10
0,04
ResolvedCases/100inhabitants
3.139
NA
NA
1.036
0.029
0.001
NAP
NA
NA
2,14
0,24
0,05
1,58
0,15
0,02
0,35
0,11
0,03
PendingCases/100inhabitants
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.019
0.001
NAP
NA
NA
Prosecutioncasesper100inhabitantProsecutioncasesperprosecutorCourtrelatedmediation
Received1.92
Discontinued0.26
ConcludedbyapenaltyNA
Chargedbeforethecourts1.56
2,07
1,04
0,20
0,59
Received98.2
Discontinued13.5
ConcludedbyapenaltyNA
Chargedbeforethecourts79.5
189,65
74,55
16,07
51,61
Note:Therearedifferentmethodologiesoncalculatingnumberofcasesinprosecutionstatisticsbyeventorbyperpetrator.CEPEJcollects
datapercase(event)butsomecountriespresentitbyperpetrator.
Doesthejudicialsystemprovideforcourt-relatedmediation
procedures?
464
Mandatorymediationbeforegoingtocourt
Mandatorymediationorderedbyajudge
3614
2921
AlternativedisputeresolutionArbitration
Conciliation
Mediation(otherthanjudicial
mediation)
OtherADR
482
1337
464
3119
IRELAND
MemberState/EntityProfile:Ireland
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
ExchangerateNAPAvggrossannualsalary38871,00GDPpercapita66716,00Population4857000,00
Professionaljudges3.3
Non-judgestaff21.6
Prosecutors2.2
Non-prosecutorstaff2.0
Lawyers270.6
17,7
60,9
11,2
14,9
123,0
HumanResources
(per100000inhabitants)
JudicialSystem59.5€
61,30€
FinancialResources
InEuros,perinhabitant
↳Courts27.8€
↳LegalAid22.9€
↳ProsecutionServices8.8€
40,79€
2,67€
11,78€
CourtTaxes9.9€
7,67€
Judges
Prosecutors
5,1
3,1
0,8
Salariesofjudgesandprosecutors
Ratiowithaverageannualsalaryatthebeginingandtheendofcarreer
Case-lawofthehighercourt/sLegaltextsOtherdocuments
www.irishstatutebook.iewww.courts.iewww.courts.ie
Judiciaryrelatedwebsites
RecruitmentandpromotionofjudgesRecruitmentandpromotionofprosecutorsICTinjudiciary
(indexfrom0to10)
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
only
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-judgesonly
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
andnon-judges
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitment
ofjudges
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:
Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
446
455
437
1832
1139
1139
2030
1832
2030
3614
464
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsandnon-prosecutors
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitmentof
prosecutors
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
3416
464
1733
1535
464
464
2129
1238
1634
3119
49
0246810
DeploymentrateCIVIL5,8
CRIMINAL5,2
ADMIN1,0
Communication
withcourts
CIVIL4,9
CRIMINAL4,4
ADMIN0,4
Courtsandcase
management
CIVIL5,9
CRIMINAL5,2
ADMIN1,8
DecisionsupportCIVIL8,9
CRIMINAL7,6
ADMIN0
6,5
5,8
6,0
5,8
4,1
5,4
7,5
7,5
7,4
6,7
7,1
6,7
Page47
MemberState/EntityProfile:Ireland
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
CEPEJefficiencyIndicators
ClearanceRate(CR)=(ResolvedCases/IncomingCases)*100|DispositionTime(DT)=(PendingCases/ResolvedCases)*365
IncomingCases=Allnewcasesatthatinstancewithintheyear|ResolvedCases=Casesfinalisedatthatinstancewithintheyear|PendingCases=UnresolvedCasesonthe31stofDecember
ClearanceRate
Civilcases1stInstance63.1%
2ndInstance75.0%
HighestInstance90.3%
Criminal
cases
1stInstanceNA
2ndInstanceNA
HighestInstance107.5%
Administrat
ivecases
1stInstanceNAP
2ndInstanceNAP
HighestInstanceNAP
1,01
1,02
0,99
1,00
0,99
0,98
1,00
0,97
0,98
DispositionTime
NA
NA
256days
NA
NA
263days
NAP
NAP
NAP
200,57
140,51
207,44
121,88
103,62
114,16
241,36
208,57
228,10
IncomingCases/100inhabitants
2.700
0.058
0.006
NA
NA
0.001
NAP
NAP
NAP
2,23
0,23
0,05
1,62
0,16
0,02
0,33
0,10
0,04
ResolvedCases/100inhabitants
1.704
0.044
0.005
NA
NA
0.001
NAP
NAP
NAP
2,14
0,24
0,05
1,58
0,15
0,02
0,35
0,11
0,03
PendingCases/100inhabitants
NA
NA
0.004
NA
NA
0.001
NAP
NAP
NAP
Prosecutioncasesper100inhabitantProsecutioncasesperprosecutorCourtrelatedmediation
Received0.24
Discontinued0.09
ConcludedbyapenaltyNA
Chargedbeforethecourts0.14
2,07
1,04
0,20
0,59
Received106.9
Discontinued41.8
ConcludedbyapenaltyNA
Chargedbeforethecourts63.1
189,65
74,55
16,07
51,61
Note:Therearedifferentmethodologiesoncalculatingnumberofcasesinprosecutionstatisticsbyeventorbyperpetrator.CEPEJcollects
datapercase(event)butsomecountriespresentitbyperpetrator.
Doesthejudicialsystemprovideforcourt-relatedmediation
procedures?
464
Mandatorymediationbeforegoingtocourt
Mandatorymediationorderedbyajudge
3614
2921
AlternativedisputeresolutionArbitration
Conciliation
Mediation(otherthanjudicial
mediation)
OtherADR
482
1337
464
3119
ITALY
MemberState/EntityProfile:Italy
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
ExchangerateNAPAvggrossannualsalary29343,00GDPpercapita29071,00Population60359546,00
Professionaljudges11.6
Non-judgestaff37.1
Prosecutors3.7
Non-prosecutorstaff14.1
Lawyers388.3
17,7
60,9
11,2
14,9
123,0
HumanResources
(per100000inhabitants)
JudicialSystem83.2€
61,30€
FinancialResources
InEuros,perinhabitant
↳Courts53.2€
↳LegalAid5.3€
↳ProsecutionServices24.7€
40,79€
2,67€
11,78€
CourtTaxes7.7€
7,67€
Judges
Prosecutors
6,4
1,9
6,4
1,9
Salariesofjudgesandprosecutors
Ratiowithaverageannualsalaryatthebeginingandtheendofcarreer
Case-lawofthehighercourt/sLegaltextsOtherdocuments
https://www.giustizia.it/giustizia/it/mg_3.page;http://webstat.giustizia.it;http://pst.giustizia.it;h..http://www.normattiva.it/https://www.giustizia.it/giustizia/it/mg_1_2.page;http://www.senato.i..http://www.italgiure.giustizia.it/sncass/;https://www.portaledelmassimario.ipzs.it/;https://www..
Judiciaryrelatedwebsites
RecruitmentandpromotionofjudgesRecruitmentandpromotionofprosecutorsICTinjudiciary
(indexfrom0to10)
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
only
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-judgesonly
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
andnon-judges
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitment
ofjudges
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:
Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
446
455
437
1832
1139
1139
2030
1832
2030
3614
464
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsandnon-prosecutors
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitmentof
prosecutors
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
3416
464
1733
1535
464
464
2129
1238
1634
3119
49
0246810
DeploymentrateCIVIL7,8
CRIMINAL4,9
ADMIN6,8
Communication
withcourts
CIVIL7,9
CRIMINAL2,0
ADMIN5,4
Courtsandcase
management
CIVIL8,3
CRIMINAL7,6
ADMIN8,3
DecisionsupportCIVIL5,6
CRIMINAL6,1
ADMIN6,7
6,5
5,8
6,0
5,8
4,1
5,4
7,5
7,5
7,4
6,7
7,1
6,7
Page49
MemberState/EntityProfile:Italy
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
CEPEJefficiencyIndicators
ClearanceRate(CR)=(ResolvedCases/IncomingCases)*100|DispositionTime(DT)=(PendingCases/ResolvedCases)*365
IncomingCases=Allnewcasesatthatinstancewithintheyear|ResolvedCases=Casesfinalisedatthatinstancewithintheyear|PendingCases=UnresolvedCasesonthe31stofDecember
ClearanceRate
Civilcases1stInstance102.9%
2ndInstance119.9%
HighestInstance87.7%
Criminal
cases
1stInstance98.4%
2ndInstance102.3%
HighestInstance110.8%
Administrat
ivecases
1stInstance136.3%
2ndInstanceNAP
HighestInstance108.5%
1,01
1,02
0,99
1,00
0,99
0,98
1,00
0,97
0,98
DispositionTime
527days
863days
1265days
361days
850days
156days
888days
NAP
791days
200,57
140,51
207,44
121,88
103,62
114,16
241,36
208,57
228,10
IncomingCases/100inhabitants
2.550
0.196
0.060
2.145
0.191
0.086
0.083
NAP
0.019
2,23
0,23
0,05
1,62
0,16
0,02
0,33
0,10
0,04
ResolvedCases/100inhabitants
2.624
0.234
0.053
2.111
0.195
0.095
0.113
NAP
0.021
2,14
0,24
0,05
1,58
0,15
0,02
0,35
0,11
0,03
PendingCases/100inhabitants
3.789
0.555
0.184
2.089
0.455
0.041
0.275
NAP
0.045
Prosecutioncasesper100inhabitantProsecutioncasesperprosecutorCourtrelatedmediation
Received4.92
Discontinued3.67
Concludedbyapenalty0.02
Chargedbeforethecourts0.92
2,07
1,04
0,20
0,59
Received1332.1
Discontinued993.0
Concludedbyapenalty4.1
Chargedbeforethecourts248.5
189,65
74,55
16,07
51,61
Note:Therearedifferentmethodologiesoncalculatingnumberofcasesinprosecutionstatisticsbyeventorbyperpetrator.CEPEJcollects
datapercase(event)butsomecountriespresentitbyperpetrator.
Doesthejudicialsystemprovideforcourt-relatedmediation
procedures?
464
Mandatorymediationbeforegoingtocourt
Mandatorymediationorderedbyajudge
3614
2921
AlternativedisputeresolutionArbitration
Conciliation
Mediation(otherthanjudicial
mediation)
OtherADR
482
1337
464
3119
LATVIA
MemberState/EntityProfile:Latvia
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
ExchangerateNAPAvggrossannualsalary12384,00GDPpercapita15136,00Population1919968,00
Professionaljudges29.1
Non-judgestaff89.3
Prosecutors23.5
Non-prosecutorstaff20.6
Lawyers63.4
17,7
60,9
11,2
14,9
123,0
HumanResources
(per100000inhabitants)
JudicialSystem47.1€
61,30€
FinancialResources
InEuros,perinhabitant
↳Courts32.2€
↳LegalAid0.9€
↳ProsecutionServices14.0€
40,79€
2,67€
11,78€
CourtTaxes6.7€
7,67€
Judges
Prosecutors
4,1
1,9
2,8
2,3
Salariesofjudgesandprosecutors
Ratiowithaverageannualsalaryatthebeginingandtheendofcarreer
Case-lawofthehighercourt/sLegaltextsOtherdocuments
www.likumi.lvhttps://manas.tiesas.lv/eTiesasMvc/nolemumihttp://www.at.gov.lv/lv/judikatura/judikaturas-nolemumu-arhivs
Judiciaryrelatedwebsites
RecruitmentandpromotionofjudgesRecruitmentandpromotionofprosecutorsICTinjudiciary
(indexfrom0to10)
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
only
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-judgesonly
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
andnon-judges
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitment
ofjudges
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:
Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
446
455
437
1832
1139
1139
2030
1832
2030
3614
464
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsandnon-prosecutors
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitmentof
prosecutors
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
3416
464
1733
1535
464
464
2129
1238
1634
3119
49
0246810
DeploymentrateCIVIL10,0
CRIMINAL10,0
ADMIN9,8
Communication
withcourts
CIVIL10,2
CRIMINAL10,2
ADMIN9,8
Courtsandcase
management
CIVIL10,0
CRIMINAL10,0
ADMIN10,0
DecisionsupportCIVIL9,3
CRIMINAL9,4
ADMIN9,3
6,5
5,8
6,0
5,8
4,1
5,4
7,5
7,5
7,4
6,7
7,1
6,7
Page51
MemberState/EntityProfile:Latvia
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
CEPEJefficiencyIndicators
ClearanceRate(CR)=(ResolvedCases/IncomingCases)*100|DispositionTime(DT)=(PendingCases/ResolvedCases)*365
IncomingCases=Allnewcasesatthatinstancewithintheyear|ResolvedCases=Casesfinalisedatthatinstancewithintheyear|PendingCases=UnresolvedCasesonthe31stofDecember
ClearanceRate
Civilcases1stInstance103.4%
2ndInstance104.4%
HighestInstance108.1%
Criminal
cases
1stInstance102.0%
2ndInstance102.4%
HighestInstance91.0%
Administrat
ivecases
1stInstance105.2%
2ndInstance106.9%
HighestInstance89.5%
1,01
1,02
0,99
1,00
0,99
0,98
1,00
0,97
0,98
DispositionTime
236days
104days
203days
118days
71days
87days
248days
168days
459days
200,57
140,51
207,44
121,88
103,62
114,16
241,36
208,57
228,10
IncomingCases/100inhabitants
1.447
0.233
0.056
0.881
0.132
0.038
0.096
0.060
0.044
2,23
0,23
0,05
1,62
0,16
0,02
0,33
0,10
0,04
ResolvedCases/100inhabitants
1.495
0.243
0.061
0.898
0.136
0.035
0.101
0.064
0.040
2,14
0,24
0,05
1,58
0,15
0,02
0,35
0,11
0,03
PendingCases/100inhabitants
0.968
0.069
0.034
0.290
0.027
0.008
0.069
0.030
0.050
Prosecutioncasesper100inhabitantProsecutioncasesperprosecutorCourtrelatedmediation
Received0.68
Discontinued0.06
Concludedbyapenalty0.08
Chargedbeforethecourts0.46
2,07
1,04
0,20
0,59
Received29.0
Discontinued2.5
Concludedbyapenalty3.5
Chargedbeforethecourts19.7
189,65
74,55
16,07
51,61
Note:Therearedifferentmethodologiesoncalculatingnumberofcasesinprosecutionstatisticsbyeventorbyperpetrator.CEPEJcollects
datapercase(event)butsomecountriespresentitbyperpetrator.
Doesthejudicialsystemprovideforcourt-relatedmediation
procedures?
464
Mandatorymediationbeforegoingtocourt
Mandatorymediationorderedbyajudge
3614
2921
AlternativedisputeresolutionArbitration
Conciliation
Mediation(otherthanjudicial
mediation)
OtherADR
482
1337
464
3119
LITHUANIA
MemberState/EntityProfile:Lithuania
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
ExchangerateNAPAvggrossannualsalary11089,00GDPpercapita16158,00Population2794184,00
Professionaljudges27.1
Non-judgestaff95.3
Prosecutors23.8
Non-prosecutorstaff19.0
Lawyers79.2
17,7
60,9
11,2
14,9
123,0
HumanResources
(per100000inhabitants)
JudicialSystem41.5€
61,30€
FinancialResources
InEuros,perinhabitant
↳Courts28.0€
↳LegalAid2.2€
↳ProsecutionServices11.3€
40,79€
2,67€
11,78€
CourtTaxes3.5€
7,67€
Judges
Prosecutors
3,3
2,2
3,2
2,4
Salariesofjudgesandprosecutors
Ratiowithaverageannualsalaryatthebeginingandtheendofcarreer
Case-lawofthehighercourt/sLegaltextsOtherdocuments
https://www.e-tar.lt;http://www.lrs.lthttp://www.teismai.lt;http://www.teisinepagalba.lthttp://liteko.teismai.lt
Judiciaryrelatedwebsites
RecruitmentandpromotionofjudgesRecruitmentandpromotionofprosecutorsICTinjudiciary
(indexfrom0to10)
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
only
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-judgesonly
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
andnon-judges
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitment
ofjudges
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:
Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
446
455
437
1832
1139
1139
2030
1832
2030
3614
464
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsandnon-prosecutors
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitmentof
prosecutors
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
3416
464
1733
1535
464
464
2129
1238
1634
3119
49
0246810
DeploymentrateCIVIL8,9
CRIMINAL5,7
ADMIN8,5
Communication
withcourts
CIVIL10,2
CRIMINAL3,2
ADMIN9,8
Courtsandcase
management
CIVIL7,7
CRIMINAL7,7
ADMIN7,7
DecisionsupportCIVIL7,8
CRIMINAL8,1
ADMIN6,7
6,5
5,8
6,0
5,8
4,1
5,4
7,5
7,5
7,4
6,7
7,1
6,7
Page53
MemberState/EntityProfile:Lithuania
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
CEPEJefficiencyIndicators
ClearanceRate(CR)=(ResolvedCases/IncomingCases)*100|DispositionTime(DT)=(PendingCases/ResolvedCases)*365
IncomingCases=Allnewcasesatthatinstancewithintheyear|ResolvedCases=Casesfinalisedatthatinstancewithintheyear|PendingCases=UnresolvedCasesonthe31stofDecember
ClearanceRate
Civilcases1stInstance103.6%
2ndInstance106.6%
HighestInstance114.6%
Criminal
cases
1stInstance101.3%
2ndInstance98.4%
HighestInstance100.3%
Administrat
ivecases
1stInstance87.6%
2ndInstance94.9%
HighestInstanceNA
1,01
1,02
0,99
1,00
0,99
0,98
1,00
0,97
0,98
DispositionTime
83days
107days
159days
54days
60days
94days
128days
385days
NA
200,57
140,51
207,44
121,88
103,62
114,16
241,36
208,57
228,10
IncomingCases/100inhabitants
3.554
0.447
0.016
0.707
0.192
0.014
0.533
0.139
NA
2,23
0,23
0,05
1,62
0,16
0,02
0,33
0,10
0,04
ResolvedCases/100inhabitants
3.682
0.477
0.019
0.716
0.189
0.014
0.467
0.132
NA
2,14
0,24
0,05
1,58
0,15
0,02
0,35
0,11
0,03
PendingCases/100inhabitants
0.844
0.140
0.008
0.107
0.031
0.004
0.165
0.139
NAP
Prosecutioncasesper100inhabitantProsecutioncasesperprosecutorCourtrelatedmediation
Received2.61
Discontinued1.16
ConcludedbyapenaltyNAP
Chargedbeforethecourts1.33
2,07
1,04
0,20
0,59
Received109.7
Discontinued48.7
ConcludedbyapenaltyNAP
Chargedbeforethecourts55.8
189,65
74,55
16,07
51,61
Note:Therearedifferentmethodologiesoncalculatingnumberofcasesinprosecutionstatisticsbyeventorbyperpetrator.CEPEJcollects
datapercase(event)butsomecountriespresentitbyperpetrator.
Doesthejudicialsystemprovideforcourt-relatedmediation
procedures?
464
Mandatorymediationbeforegoingtocourt
Mandatorymediationorderedbyajudge
3614
2921
AlternativedisputeresolutionArbitration
Conciliation
Mediation(otherthanjudicial
mediation)
OtherADR
482
1337
464
3119
LUXEMBOURG
MemberState/EntityProfile:Luxembourg
CEPEJ(2020)11CountryprofileE
Dataupdatedon17/07/2020141304
ExchangerateNAPAvggrossannualsalary61720,00GDPpercapita95943,00Population613900,00
Professionaljudges36.2
Non-judgestaff35.8
Prosecutors9.0
Non-prosecutorstaff22.0
Lawyers487.5
17,7
60,9
11,2
14,9
123,0
HumanResources
(per100000inhabitants)
JudicialSystemNA€
61,30€
FinancialResources
InEuros,perinhabitant
↳CourtsNA€
↳LegalAidNA€
↳ProsecutionServicesNA€
40,79€
2,67€
11,78€
CourtTaxesNAP€
7,67€
Judges
Prosecutors
1,4
1,4
Salariesofjudgesandprosecutors
Ratiowithaverageannualsalaryatthebeginingandtheendofcarreer
Case-lawofthehighercourt/sLegaltextsOtherdocuments
http://www.luxembourg.public.lu/fr/actualites/2009/01/01-guichet-unique/index.htmlhttp://www.luxembourg.public.lu/fr/actualites/2009/01/01-guichet-unique/index.htmlhttp://www.luxembourg.public.lu/fr/actualites/2009/01/01-guichet-unique/index.html
Judiciaryrelatedwebsites
RecruitmentandpromotionofjudgesRecruitmentandpromotionofprosecutorsICTinjudiciary
(indexfrom0to10)
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
only
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-judgesonly
Byanauthoritymadeupofjudges
andnon-judges
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitment
ofjudges
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:
Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
446
455
437
1832
1139
1139
2030
1832
2030
3614
464
Recruitment
authority
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
non-prosecutorsonly
Byanauthoritymadeupof
prosecutorsandnon-prosecutors
PromotionauthoritySameauthorityasforrecruitmentof
prosecutors
PromotioncriteriaCriteriaforpromotion:Yearsof
experience
Criteriaforpromotion:Professional
skills
Criteriaforpromotion:Performance
Criteriaforpromotion:Assessment
results
Criteriaforpromotion:Subjective
criteria
Othercriteriaforpromotion
Nocriteriaforpromotion
3416
464
1733
1535
464
464
2129
1238
1634
3119
49
0246810
DeploymentrateCIVIL5,0
CRIMINAL6,2
ADMIN4,1
Communication
withcourts
CIVIL3,0
CRIMINAL5,5
ADMIN1,7
Courtsandcase
management
CIVIL6,6
CRIMINAL6,6
ADMIN5,9
DecisionsupportCIVIL6,7
CRIMINAL7,1
ADMIN6,7
6,5
5,8
6,0
5,8
4,1
5,4
7,5
7,5
7,4
6,7
7,1
6,7
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні
CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні

More Related Content

Similar to CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні

Europe B2C Ecommerce report 2013 - light version
Europe B2C Ecommerce report 2013 -  light versionEurope B2C Ecommerce report 2013 -  light version
Europe B2C Ecommerce report 2013 - light version
Marja Ruigrok
 
P. Annoni: The European Commission measures the level of regional competitive...
P. Annoni: The European Commission measures the level of regional competitive...P. Annoni: The European Commission measures the level of regional competitive...
P. Annoni: The European Commission measures the level of regional competitive...
Istituto nazionale di statistica
 
Celia SANCHEZ, Antonio MORENO, Maria del Carmen CABRERA: Territorial socio-ec...
Celia SANCHEZ, Antonio MORENO, Maria del Carmen CABRERA: Territorial socio-ec...Celia SANCHEZ, Antonio MORENO, Maria del Carmen CABRERA: Territorial socio-ec...
Celia SANCHEZ, Antonio MORENO, Maria del Carmen CABRERA: Territorial socio-ec...
Territorial Intelligence
 
Report part-2-english.docx94-95
Report part-2-english.docx94-95Report part-2-english.docx94-95
Report part-2-english.docx94-95
Pravotv
 
Schulmeister juli 2013
Schulmeister juli 2013Schulmeister juli 2013
Schulmeister juli 2013
ManfredNolte
 
Economic analysis of the European seaport system 2
Economic analysis of the  European seaport system 2 Economic analysis of the  European seaport system 2
Economic analysis of the European seaport system 2
Cláudio Carneiro
 
FRA Annual Report 2008
FRA Annual Report 2008FRA Annual Report 2008
FRA Annual Report 2008
Thomas Müller
 

Similar to CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні (20)

Europe B2C Ecommerce report 2013 - light version
Europe B2C Ecommerce report 2013 -  light versionEurope B2C Ecommerce report 2013 -  light version
Europe B2C Ecommerce report 2013 - light version
 
P. Annoni: The European Commission measures the level of regional competitive...
P. Annoni: The European Commission measures the level of regional competitive...P. Annoni: The European Commission measures the level of regional competitive...
P. Annoni: The European Commission measures the level of regional competitive...
 
B08 A44s Animation
B08 A44s AnimationB08 A44s Animation
B08 A44s Animation
 
Annegret Thieken, University of Potsdam Assessing economic losses at national...
Annegret Thieken, University of Potsdam Assessing economic losses at national...Annegret Thieken, University of Potsdam Assessing economic losses at national...
Annegret Thieken, University of Potsdam Assessing economic losses at national...
 
Celia SANCHEZ, Antonio MORENO, Maria del Carmen CABRERA: Territorial socio-ec...
Celia SANCHEZ, Antonio MORENO, Maria del Carmen CABRERA: Territorial socio-ec...Celia SANCHEZ, Antonio MORENO, Maria del Carmen CABRERA: Territorial socio-ec...
Celia SANCHEZ, Antonio MORENO, Maria del Carmen CABRERA: Territorial socio-ec...
 
2012 Update Report to the Study to quantify and analyse the VAT Gap in the EU...
2012 Update Report to the Study to quantify and analyse the VAT Gap in the EU...2012 Update Report to the Study to quantify and analyse the VAT Gap in the EU...
2012 Update Report to the Study to quantify and analyse the VAT Gap in the EU...
 
Europe B2C E-commerce Report 2013
Europe B2C E-commerce Report 2013Europe B2C E-commerce Report 2013
Europe B2C E-commerce Report 2013
 
Report part-2-english.docx94-95
Report part-2-english.docx94-95Report part-2-english.docx94-95
Report part-2-english.docx94-95
 
Schulmeister juli 2013
Schulmeister juli 2013Schulmeister juli 2013
Schulmeister juli 2013
 
Economic analysis of the European seaport system 2
Economic analysis of the  European seaport system 2 Economic analysis of the  European seaport system 2
Economic analysis of the European seaport system 2
 
Boo games-abridged-report
Boo games-abridged-reportBoo games-abridged-report
Boo games-abridged-report
 
Copyright and the Court of Justice of the European Union (Eleonora Rosati)
Copyright and the Court of Justice of the European Union (Eleonora Rosati)Copyright and the Court of Justice of the European Union (Eleonora Rosati)
Copyright and the Court of Justice of the European Union (Eleonora Rosati)
 
FRA Annual Report 2008
FRA Annual Report 2008FRA Annual Report 2008
FRA Annual Report 2008
 
051.812.955.17 folder to Tax Return
051.812.955.17 folder to Tax Return051.812.955.17 folder to Tax Return
051.812.955.17 folder to Tax Return
 
Sbr Poland October 9, 2009 Warsaw
Sbr Poland October 9, 2009 WarsawSbr Poland October 9, 2009 Warsaw
Sbr Poland October 9, 2009 Warsaw
 
eXplorer: a dynamic statistical data visualization tool to support Italian de...
eXplorer: a dynamic statistical data visualization tool to support Italian de...eXplorer: a dynamic statistical data visualization tool to support Italian de...
eXplorer: a dynamic statistical data visualization tool to support Italian de...
 
Reforms for a stronger and more integrated Europe OECD Economic Surveys EU eu...
Reforms for a stronger and more integrated Europe OECD Economic Surveys EU eu...Reforms for a stronger and more integrated Europe OECD Economic Surveys EU eu...
Reforms for a stronger and more integrated Europe OECD Economic Surveys EU eu...
 
EU wants pilot projects on migration with Africa
EU wants pilot projects on migration with AfricaEU wants pilot projects on migration with Africa
EU wants pilot projects on migration with Africa
 
Earnings in Europe. A Comparative Study on Wage and Income Disparities in the...
Earnings in Europe. A Comparative Study on Wage and Income Disparities in the...Earnings in Europe. A Comparative Study on Wage and Income Disparities in the...
Earnings in Europe. A Comparative Study on Wage and Income Disparities in the...
 
Red tapeftt
Red tapefttRed tapeftt
Red tapeftt
 

More from Pravotv

More from Pravotv (20)

Проект Закону 6358
Проект Закону 6358Проект Закону 6358
Проект Закону 6358
 
Проект Закону про внесення змін до Податкового кодексу України щодо оподаткув...
Проект Закону про внесення змін до Податкового кодексу України щодо оподаткув...Проект Закону про внесення змін до Податкового кодексу України щодо оподаткув...
Проект Закону про внесення змін до Податкового кодексу України щодо оподаткув...
 
Завершено проведення співбесід з кандидатами на вакантні адміністративні поса...
Завершено проведення співбесід з кандидатами на вакантні адміністративні поса...Завершено проведення співбесід з кандидатами на вакантні адміністративні поса...
Завершено проведення співбесід з кандидатами на вакантні адміністративні поса...
 
У ДСА роз’яснили питання роботи з процесуальними документами, поданих до суду...
У ДСА роз’яснили питання роботи з процесуальними документами, поданих до суду...У ДСА роз’яснили питання роботи з процесуальними документами, поданих до суду...
У ДСА роз’яснили питання роботи з процесуальними документами, поданих до суду...
 
УЗАГАЛЬНЕННЯ ПРАКТИКИ СУДУ КАСАЦІЙНОЇ ІНСТАНЦІЇ З ПИТАНЬ ПРОВЕДЕННЯ ТА ОЦІНЮВ...
УЗАГАЛЬНЕННЯ ПРАКТИКИ СУДУ КАСАЦІЙНОЇ ІНСТАНЦІЇ З ПИТАНЬ ПРОВЕДЕННЯ ТА ОЦІНЮВ...УЗАГАЛЬНЕННЯ ПРАКТИКИ СУДУ КАСАЦІЙНОЇ ІНСТАНЦІЇ З ПИТАНЬ ПРОВЕДЕННЯ ТА ОЦІНЮВ...
УЗАГАЛЬНЕННЯ ПРАКТИКИ СУДУ КАСАЦІЙНОЇ ІНСТАНЦІЇ З ПИТАНЬ ПРОВЕДЕННЯ ТА ОЦІНЮВ...
 
Огляд рішень Європейського суду з прав людини
Огляд рішень Європейського суду з прав людиниОгляд рішень Європейського суду з прав людини
Огляд рішень Європейського суду з прав людини
 
Зеленский внес проект об ответственности для руководителей компаний за несвое...
Зеленский внес проект об ответственности для руководителей компаний за несвое...Зеленский внес проект об ответственности для руководителей компаний за несвое...
Зеленский внес проект об ответственности для руководителей компаний за несвое...
 
Настойку каннабісу дозволять придбати виключно через електронний рецепт: МОЗ ...
Настойку каннабісу дозволять придбати виключно через електронний рецепт: МОЗ ...Настойку каннабісу дозволять придбати виключно через електронний рецепт: МОЗ ...
Настойку каннабісу дозволять придбати виключно через електронний рецепт: МОЗ ...
 
Відкрите звернення Ради суддів України до Президента України щодо кадрового д...
Відкрите звернення Ради суддів України до Президента України щодо кадрового д...Відкрите звернення Ради суддів України до Президента України щодо кадрового д...
Відкрите звернення Ради суддів України до Президента України щодо кадрового д...
 
Огляд судової практики Касаційного господарського суду у складі Верховного Суду
Огляд судової практики Касаційного господарського суду у складі Верховного СудуОгляд судової практики Касаційного господарського суду у складі Верховного Суду
Огляд судової практики Касаційного господарського суду у складі Верховного Суду
 
Звернення Національної асоціації адвокатів України
Звернення Національної асоціації адвокатів УкраїниЗвернення Національної асоціації адвокатів України
Звернення Національної асоціації адвокатів України
 
Про публічне звернення Вищої ради правосуддя
Про публічне звернення Вищої ради правосуддяПро публічне звернення Вищої ради правосуддя
Про публічне звернення Вищої ради правосуддя
 
УКАЗ ПРЕЗИДЕНТА УКРАЇНИ №584/2021
УКАЗ ПРЕЗИДЕНТА УКРАЇНИ №584/2021УКАЗ ПРЕЗИДЕНТА УКРАЇНИ №584/2021
УКАЗ ПРЕЗИДЕНТА УКРАЇНИ №584/2021
 
НАЗК вважає некоректним виключати членів кваліфікаційно-дисциплінарних комісі...
НАЗК вважає некоректним виключати членів кваліфікаційно-дисциплінарних комісі...НАЗК вважає некоректним виключати членів кваліфікаційно-дисциплінарних комісі...
НАЗК вважає некоректним виключати членів кваліфікаційно-дисциплінарних комісі...
 
Наказ про затвердження Положення про відомчі заохочувальні відзнаки прокурат...
Наказ про затвердження Положення про відомчі заохочувальні відзнаки  прокурат...Наказ про затвердження Положення про відомчі заохочувальні відзнаки  прокурат...
Наказ про затвердження Положення про відомчі заохочувальні відзнаки прокурат...
 
Эскиз нагрудного знака "Ветеран прокуратуры Украины"
 Эскиз нагрудного знака "Ветеран прокуратуры Украины" Эскиз нагрудного знака "Ветеран прокуратуры Украины"
Эскиз нагрудного знака "Ветеран прокуратуры Украины"
 
Кабмін запровадить нові вимоги для захисту докторських дисертацій: деталі
Кабмін запровадить нові вимоги для захисту докторських дисертацій: деталіКабмін запровадить нові вимоги для захисту докторських дисертацій: деталі
Кабмін запровадить нові вимоги для захисту докторських дисертацій: деталі
 
Список кандидатів, які за результатами співбесіди 16.11.21, не набрали прохід...
Список кандидатів, які за результатами співбесіди 16.11.21, не набрали прохід...Список кандидатів, які за результатами співбесіди 16.11.21, не набрали прохід...
Список кандидатів, які за результатами співбесіди 16.11.21, не набрали прохід...
 
Кабмін пропонує змінити умови обрання ректорів вишів: як це вплине на освіту
Кабмін пропонує змінити умови обрання ректорів вишів: як це вплине на освітуКабмін пропонує змінити умови обрання ректорів вишів: як це вплине на освіту
Кабмін пропонує змінити умови обрання ректорів вишів: як це вплине на освіту
 
Графік проведення співбесід кандидатів на вакантні адміністативні посади в ор...
Графік проведення співбесід кандидатів на вакантні адміністативні посади в ор...Графік проведення співбесід кандидатів на вакантні адміністативні посади в ор...
Графік проведення співбесід кандидатів на вакантні адміністативні посади в ор...
 

Recently uploaded

9953056974 Call Girls In Pratap Nagar, Escorts (Delhi) NCR
9953056974 Call Girls In Pratap Nagar, Escorts (Delhi) NCR9953056974 Call Girls In Pratap Nagar, Escorts (Delhi) NCR
9953056974 Call Girls In Pratap Nagar, Escorts (Delhi) NCR
9953056974 Low Rate Call Girls In Saket, Delhi NCR
 
call girls inMahavir Nagar (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7
call girls inMahavir Nagar  (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7call girls inMahavir Nagar  (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7
call girls inMahavir Nagar (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7
9953056974 Low Rate Call Girls In Saket, Delhi NCR
 
The political system of the united kingdom
The political system of the united kingdomThe political system of the united kingdom
The political system of the united kingdom
lunadelior
 

Recently uploaded (14)

Unveiling the Characteristics of Political Institutions_ A Comprehensive Anal...
Unveiling the Characteristics of Political Institutions_ A Comprehensive Anal...Unveiling the Characteristics of Political Institutions_ A Comprehensive Anal...
Unveiling the Characteristics of Political Institutions_ A Comprehensive Anal...
 
declarationleaders_sd_re_greens_theleft_5.pdf
declarationleaders_sd_re_greens_theleft_5.pdfdeclarationleaders_sd_re_greens_theleft_5.pdf
declarationleaders_sd_re_greens_theleft_5.pdf
 
9953056974 Call Girls In Pratap Nagar, Escorts (Delhi) NCR
9953056974 Call Girls In Pratap Nagar, Escorts (Delhi) NCR9953056974 Call Girls In Pratap Nagar, Escorts (Delhi) NCR
9953056974 Call Girls In Pratap Nagar, Escorts (Delhi) NCR
 
Dubai Call Girls Pinky O525547819 Call Girl's In Dubai
Dubai Call Girls Pinky O525547819 Call Girl's In DubaiDubai Call Girls Pinky O525547819 Call Girl's In Dubai
Dubai Call Girls Pinky O525547819 Call Girl's In Dubai
 
Indegene Limited IPO Detail - Divadhvik
Indegene Limited IPO Detail  - DivadhvikIndegene Limited IPO Detail  - Divadhvik
Indegene Limited IPO Detail - Divadhvik
 
10052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
10052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf10052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
10052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
Job-Oriеntеd Courses That Will Boost Your Career in 2024
Job-Oriеntеd Courses That Will Boost Your Career in 2024Job-Oriеntеd Courses That Will Boost Your Career in 2024
Job-Oriеntеd Courses That Will Boost Your Career in 2024
 
Politician uddhav thackeray biography- Full Details
Politician uddhav thackeray biography- Full DetailsPolitician uddhav thackeray biography- Full Details
Politician uddhav thackeray biography- Full Details
 
call girls inMahavir Nagar (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7
call girls inMahavir Nagar  (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7call girls inMahavir Nagar  (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7
call girls inMahavir Nagar (delhi) call me [🔝9953056974🔝] escort service 24X7
 
422524114-Patriarchy-Kamla-Bhasin gg.pdf
422524114-Patriarchy-Kamla-Bhasin gg.pdf422524114-Patriarchy-Kamla-Bhasin gg.pdf
422524114-Patriarchy-Kamla-Bhasin gg.pdf
 
KING VISHNU BHAGWANON KA BHAGWAN PARAMATMONKA PARATOMIC PARAMANU KASARVAMANVA...
KING VISHNU BHAGWANON KA BHAGWAN PARAMATMONKA PARATOMIC PARAMANU KASARVAMANVA...KING VISHNU BHAGWANON KA BHAGWAN PARAMATMONKA PARATOMIC PARAMANU KASARVAMANVA...
KING VISHNU BHAGWANON KA BHAGWAN PARAMATMONKA PARATOMIC PARAMANU KASARVAMANVA...
 
The political system of the united kingdom
The political system of the united kingdomThe political system of the united kingdom
The political system of the united kingdom
 
11052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
11052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf11052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
11052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
06052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
06052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf06052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
06052024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 

CEPEJ: Найбільше зростання бюджетних асигнувань на суди спостерігалося в Україні