3. > Recognition rules on indigenous innovation product
> Budget Rules
> Review Rules
> Contract Management
National S&T Conferece 2006
Mid-Long Term Guideline for S&T Development
MOF 2007: Rules on Government Procurement
of Indigenous Innovation Product
Research Background
The Third Sino-US Joint Statement 2011
Lisbon Conference 2000
Kok Report 2004
Aho Report 2006
Europe 2020
European Commission 2007
> Innovation League Innitiative
> European Digitalizaion Agenda
> Industry Policy in Global Economy
> Resource Efficiency Innitative
> Catalogue of indigenous innovation product
4. Research Question & Hypothesis
Literature Review
Empirical Study
Results & Findings
Research Background
5. Policy Dilemma of GP Policy for Innovation
Literature Review
• pioneer demand
• user-supply interaction > Strengthened interaction platform (Rolfstam, 2005)
> Sole interaction platform (Lundvall, 1988)
> Scale of the demand
> Sophistication of demand(Beise, 2003; Dalpe, 1992)
6. Policy Dilemma of GP Policy for Innovation
Literature Review
Procurement
Regulation
Demand
Driving Force
?
Catalogue
7. Policy Dilemma of GP Policy for Innovation
Literature Review
Procurement
Regulation
Demand
Driving Force
?
8. Policy Dilemma of GP Policy for Innovation
Literature Review
Demand
Driving Force
?Independent Variable
Competition Regulation
9. Policy Dilemma of GP Policy for Innovation
Literature Review
?Independent Variable
Competition Regulation
Dependent Variable
Dominant Design
10. Policy Dilemma of GP Policy for Innovation
Literature Review
Intermediate Varialbe
Market Structure
(Cabral, 2006)
Independent Variable
Competition Regulation
Dependent Variable
Dominant Design
11. Intermediate Varialbe
Market Structure
Independent Variable
Competition Regulation
Dependent Variable
Dominant Design
Research Question & Hypothesis
Competition Regulation Market Strucuture Dominant Design
Procurement Method
> Open bidding
> Selective bidding
> Restrictive bidding
> Market Concertration
> Market Volume
Suppliers example-market
> How fast the emergence is
> How much the portion is
12. Research Question & Hypothesis
Literature Review
Empirical Study
Results & Findings
Research Background
13. Empirical Study
20,641,845 contracts822,332 IT contracts
DOE DOT DOD DOA FTC FEC FDA ……
2012
2011
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
2005
2004
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
1,113 example markets
15. 7040 7022 7020 7042 7021 7025 7010 7050 7035
Procurement Ratio and PLC stage
Sales Introduction DeclineGrowth Mature
Product Life Cycle
Dependent Variable
Dominant Design
Empirical Study
16. 7040 7022 7020 7042 7021 7025 7010 7050 7035
Sales Introduction DeclineGrowth Mature
Product Life Cycle
Dependent Variable
Dominant Design
Empirical Study
Procurement Ratio and PLC stage
17. 7040 7022 7020 7042 7021 7025 7010 7050 7035
Sales Introduction DeclineGrowth Mature
Product Life Cycle
Dependent Variable
Dominant Design
Empirical Study
Procurement Ratio and PLC stage
18. 7040 7022 7020 7042 7021 7025 7010 7050 7035
Sales Introduction DeclineGrowth Mature
Product Life Cycle
Dependent Variable
Dominant Design
Empirical Study
Procurement Ratio and PLC stage
19. 7040 7022 7020 7042 7021 7025 7010 7050 7035
α β
Sales Introduction DeclineGrowth Mature
Product Life Cycle
Dependent Variable
Dominant Design
Empirical Study
Procurement Ratio and PLC stage
20. Research Field Sales Price Profit Supplier Number
Chen & Qiao,2001 Bearing
Gong,2003 household
Zhang & Ding, Car
Lv,2007 Ring
Duan,2012 logistics
Ma,2007 telecommunication
Shi & Lin,2009 mobile
Xiao,2009 chemical
Liu & Lei,2010 household
Liu,2008 traffic
This Study IT product
Common Indicators of Belonging Fuction
Dependent Variable
Dominant Design
Empirical Study
21. Belonging area of PLC stages
Belonging function of three indicator
Dependent Variable
Dominant Design
Empirical Study
Belonging Area
Stage 1
Stage 2
Stage 3
Stage 4
Belonging Function
27. n,N,i represents Supplier number,ai represents Market Share of Supplier i,
A represents Market Volume.
Variable
N
Mean Middle St Range Min Max
Effective Missing
Supplier Number 1113 0 79.84 21 333.97 4531 1 4532
HHI 1113 0 0.3349 0.2344 0.28222 0.97 0.03 1
Statistic Description of Market Structure
Intermediate Varialbe
Market Structure
Empirical Study
28. Research Question & Hypothesis
Literature Review
Empirical Study
Results & Findings
Research Background
29. Results & Findings
Variables
Sample
Mean Middle St Range Min Max
Effective Missing
Dominent Design
Emerging Efficiency
1113 0 6.3107 2.7692 12.17738 100 0 100
HHI 1113 0 0.3349 0.2344 0.28222 0.97 0.03 1
Supplier Number 1113 0 79.84 21 333.97 4531 1 4532
Open Bidding 1113 0 0.6447 0.7422 0.32729 1 0 1
Selective Bidding 1113 0 0.1684 0.0714 0.24246 1 0 1
Restrictive Bidding 1113 0 0.187 0.0726 0.26436 1 0 1
Statistic description of all variables
30. Variable HHI Supplier Number
Open Bidding
-.225***
(-.206)
-.384**
(-.144)
Selective Bidding
.012*
(.020)
.067*
(.047)
Restrictive Bidding
.054*
(.094)
-.178**
(-.127)
Constant -2.034*** 2.513***
R2 .081 .018
Adjust R2 .075 .012
F 13.456 2.862
Sample 1113 1113
Results & Findings
Influence of Competition Regulation on Market Structure
31. Variable Dominent Design Emerging Efficiency
HHI
.072*
(.046)
Supplier Number
.154**
(.172)
Constant .832***
R2 .032
Adjusted R2 .024
F 3.997
Sample 1113
Results & Findings
Influence of Market Structure on Dominent Design Emerging Efficiency
37. Results & Findings
Intermediate Varialbe
Market Structure
Independent Variable
Competition Regulation
Dependent Variable
Dominant Design
Open bidding
Selective bidding
Restrictive bidding
Market Concerntration
Market Volume
Dominant
Design
2. Open bidding restricts the market shaping function of GP, while
Selective & restrictive supports it.
38. 0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
导入1期 导入2期 成长1期 成长2期 成长3期 成熟1期 成熟2期 成熟3期 衰退1期
完全公开竞争 非完全公开竞争 限制供应商来源的完全公开竞争
Influence on Market Structure
Results & Findings
PLC
3. Selective & restrictive bidding is the major carrier of GP Policy for Innovation,
but is only effective at the early stage of technology evolution.
Introduction DeclineGrowth Mature
Open (-)
Restrictive (+)
Selective (+)
39. Results & Findings
1. Market structure shaping is a feasible logic for GP Policy for Innovation.
2. Open bidding restricts the market shaping function of GP, while
Selective & restrictive supports it.
3. Selective & restrictive bidding is the major carrier of GP Policy for Innovation,
but is only effective at the early stage of technology evolution.