Copy of my presentation about my undergraduate research concerning squirrel behavior in urban parks in Montreal, Canada, to Chicago State University in the Fall of 2010.
Foraging and Anti-Predation Behavior in Eastern Grey Squirrels
1. Home-Range Security
A Fresh Look at
Foraging
and Anti-Predation
Behavior in
Eastern Grey Squirrels
Noah Sager
18 November 2010
Chicago State University
Department of Geography
2. The Field
Behavioral Ecology
The study of an animal’s behavior (decisions) dependent
upon its environment, and the conferred adaptive benefits or
costs
Behavioral Geography
The study of a human’s behavior (decisions) dependent
upon its environment, and the conferred adaptive benefits or
costs
5. Definitions
Anti-Predator Vigilance
‘Early-warning’ behavior that enables animals to avoid predation
(e.g. predator detection)
Intermittent Locomotion
Cyclical movement of motion, pause (vigilance), motion
Foraging
The gathering and subsequent consumption or scatter-hoarding of
food items
Scatter-hoarding
The burying or hoarding of food items in individual locations
6. Pause Postures
Left to Right
Extended Upright
Upright
Semi-Upright
Quadrupedal Up*
Quadrupedal Down*
Tripedal*
7. Previous Studies
Wistrand (1974)
Newman et al. (1988) http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3402/3261412644_9a6c4be2c1.jpg
Jones (1998)
McAdam & Kramer (1998)
Tchabovsky et al. (2001)
Trouilloud et al. (2004)
http://www.hiltonpond.org/images/ChipmunkEastern06.jpg
8. Anti-Predator Vigilance:
Feed or Flee?
Study Area
Urban parks around Montreal, Quebec (Canada)
Summer of 2004
Description
The non-invasive video recording of squirrel behavior at artificial
foraging patches with varying distances from cover
Materials
digital video camera, food dish, measuring tape, sand, stakes
peanuts, peanut butter, sunflower seeds
9. Anti-Predator Vigilance:
Food or Foe?
Methods
36 squirrels (1 per site)
100m distance between sites http://insidevalleyforgepark.pbworks.com/f/IMG_0186.JPG
3 distances from cover (0.3m, 5m and 15m)
Newman et al. (1988)
Food patch: 1 liter ‘treated’ sand patch with inverted food dish
25 whole sunflower seeds (15 buried), 1/4 tsp. creamy peanut butter,
5 whole peanuts
Confounding conspecifics
End of trial requirements
10. Anti-Predator Vigilance:
Forage or Die Trying
Data Extraction
Noldus Observer
Digital recordings analyzed frame-by-frame
Behavior Durations and Frequency
Locomotion
Pauses
Transition Times
Motion to Pause (locomotion to vigilance)
Pause to Pause (pause posture to posture)
Pause to Motion (vigilance to locomotion)
11. Anti-Predator Vigilance:
It’s a Dog Eat Squirrel World
Data Analysis
One and two-way ANOVAs (analysis of variance)
Bonferroni corrections (post-hoc)
Question 1: Are more upright (more vigilant) pause postures
really more costly?
Question 2: Are transition durations dependent upon pause
posture?
Question 3: Is there an effect of distance from cover on pause
duration or transition times?
Question 4: Is there a vigilance component to foraging?
12. Results
Pause durations varied significantly depending upon posture, with upright pauses lasting longer than semi-
upright pauses (F2,52=8.657, P<0.01), and semi-upright pauses lasting longer than quadrupedal pauses
(F2,46=3.115, P<0.01), and this was still significant following a Bonferroni post-hoc test.
13. Results
Posture type had a significant effect on transition times, requiring more time for a squirrel to move from
locomotion to a semi-upright posture than to a quadrupedal posture (F2,52=49.396, P<0.01) and more time to
move to locomotion from a semi-upright posture than from a quadrupedal posture (F2,66=68.910, P<0.01),
and this was still significant following a Bonferroni post-hoc test.
14. Results
There was a slight effect of distance on transition times to move from locomotion to quadrupedal alert
(F2,44=0.067, P=0.057), but no effect from locomotion to semi-upright alert posture (F2,42=0.270, P=0.758).
Accordingly, there was no effect of distance on transition times moving from quadrupedal alert to
locomotion (F2,58=0.065, P=0.352), to semi-upright alert (F2,32=0.351, P=0.707), or from semi-upright alert to
locomotion (F2,49=0.600, P=0.553). There was no effect of distance from cover on pause duration for all
postures (F3,31=0.902, P=0.409).
15. Results
Left: Frequency Distribution of Quadrupedal Pauses During Locomotion. Duration category is measured by
number of frames (1 Frame = 1/30 seconds). n = 624, mean = 3.92, median = 8.
Right : Frequency Distribution of Quadrupedal Pauses In Patch. Duration category is measured by
number of frames (1 Frame = 1/30 seconds). n = 164, mean = 14.37, median = 7.
(see: Makowska & Kramer 2007)
16. Discussion
Question 1: Are more upright (more vigilant) pause postures
really more costly?
Supported (first empirical evidence)
Question 2: Are transition durations dependent upon pause
posture?
Supported (first empirical evidence)
Question 3: Is there an effect of distance from cover on pause
duration or transition times?
Failed to support (contrary to previous studies)
Question 4: Is there a vigilance component to foraging?
Failed to support (requires future studies)
17. Conclusion(s)
Vigilance is costly
Positive correlation between pause duration and posture,
and between transition time and posture
Constrained decisions, time-budget
Squirrels maintain a constant time-budget concerning
foraging and anti-predation activities
Vigilance trade-offs
Distance from Cover versus Detection Range*
18. Acknowledgements
McGill University - Behavioural Ecology Lab
2004 - 2005
Dr. Donald L. Kramer
Research Supervisor
Talya Hackett
Field Assistant
The Squirrels
Numbers 1 - ?