SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 29
Updating UK Risk Assessment Guidance Dr. Mengfang Chen, Technical Director
Outline ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
USEPA RAGS Tier 2 RBCA Toolkit ASTM E1739 Petroleum RBCA RBCA V1.0 ASTM P104 Chemical RBCA Marked the Start  of  CLEA CLEA 97 CLEA2000 CLEA2002 CLEA UK CLAN6/06 1989 1996 1999 1992 1997 2000 2002 2005 2006 Period of Development and Debate, and Continuing 2008 RBCA V2.01 2000 RBCA CLEA Plant Uptake Dermal Contact Indoor and Outdoor Vapours Probabilistic versus Deterministic Plant Uptake Vapour from Surface Soil Probabilistic versus Deterministic Plant Uptake Period of Development Period of Model Improvement and UK Compliance CLEA 97 CLEA UK CLEA V1.03 CLEA 2002 2008 CLEA V1.03 RBCA V1.3 ASTM E2081 Chemical RBCA CLEA RBCA History of CLEA Development
[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],Updating and Replacing CLR10 and CLEA Briefing Notes 1 to 4 New Guidance JUST Published and Forthcoming
CLEA 97 CLEA UK CLEA V1.03 CLEA 2002 New Guidance JUST Published and Forthcoming ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]
Exposure Duration and Averaging Time Changes in Standard Land Uses 17885 49 years (Age Class 17) Working Adult Commercial 2190 6 years Age Class (1 to 6) Younger Child Allotments 2190 6 years (Age Class 1 to 6) Younger Child Residential Averaging Time (days) Exposure Duration (years) Critical Receptor Standard Land Use
Exposure Frequencies Changes in Standard Land Uses Values in brackets are EF for ALLOTMENT where different from Resident Land use 170 230 170 230 - 230 17 (16 to 65) 365 (65) 365 (0) 365 (65) 365 (0) 365 365 (65) 6 (5 to 6) 365 (65) 365 (0) 365 (65) 365 (0) 365 365 (65) 5 (4 to 5) 365 (130) 365 (0) 365 (130) 365 (0) 365 365 (130) 4 (3 to 4) 365 (130) 365 (0) 365 (130) 365 (0) 365 365 (130) 3 (2 to 3) 365 (130) 365 (0) 365 (130) 365 (0) 365 365 (130) 2 (1 to 2) 365 (25) 365 (0) 180 (25) 180 (0) 180 180 (25) 1 (0 to 1) days /year Outdoor Inhalation Indoor Inhalation Dermal Outdoor Dermal Indoor Homegrown Produce Soil and Dust Ingestion Age Class (year)
Building Parameters Changes in Standard Land Uses 0.165 (0.1647) 0.04 (0.0423) m 2 Floor Crack Area 0.15 0.15 m Foundation Thickness 4.4 3.1 Pa Pressure Difference between Soil and Indoor Air 1.0 0.5 hour -1 Air Exchange Rate 6.4 (9.6) 4.8 m Living Space Height 424 28 m 2 Footprint Area Commercial (Three-Storey Pre 1970 Office) Residential (Two-Storey Small Terrace House) Unit Parameters
Consumption Rates and Home Grown Fractions Changes in Standard Land Uses 0.27 0.04 ( 0.22 ) 4.26 4.26 11.96 11.96 11.96 3.82 Tree Fruit 0.6 0.09 ( 0.35 ) 0.16 0.16 0.54 0.54 0.54 2.23 Shrub Fruit 0.4 0.06 ( 0.24 ) 1.85 1.85 3.96 3.96 3.96 1.83 Herbaceous Fruit 0.13 0.02 ( 0.12 ) 3.38 3.38 5.46 5.46 5.46 16.03 Tuber Vegetables 0.4 0.06 ( 0.38 ) 1.77 1.77 3.30 3.30 3.30 10.69 Root Vegetables 0.33 0.05 ( 0.39 ) 3.74 3.74 6.85 6.85 6.85 7.12 Green Vegetables Allotment Residential 5 to 6 4 to 5 3 to 4 2 to 3 1 to 2 0 to 1 Home Grown Fractions (HF) Consumption Rate (CR) (g FW kg -1  BW day -1 ) Vegetable Type
Key Exposure Parameters Changes in Standard Land Uses 14.8 0.7 8.3 50 160 70 17 (16 to 65) 12.2 (24.9) 1 (3) 19 100 110 19.7 6 (5 to 6) 12.2 (21.3) 1 (3) 19 100 100 16.9 5 (4 to 5) 12.2 (19.1) 1 (3) 23 100 90 15.1 4 (3 to 4) 12.7 (20.7) 1 (3) 23 100 90 12.7 3 (2 to 3) 13.3 (18.8) 1 (3) 23 100 80 9.8 2 (1 to 2) 8.5 (10.3) 1 (3) 23 100 70 5.6 1 (0 to 1) m 3 /day Hour d -1 Hour d -1 mg/d cm kg Daily Inhalation Rate (V inh ) Outdoor Site Occupancy Period (T site ) Indoor Site Occupancy Period (T site ) Soil and Dust Ingestion Rate Body Height (H) Body Weight (BW) Age Class (year)
Changes in Standard Land Uses Parameters Affecting Inhalation of Indoor and Outdoor Dust Q/C default values were taken from Newcastle  representing areas of 0.01, 0.5 and 2 Ha  Respectively for residential, allotment and  commercial land uses TL and SL used to calculate  intake rate for inhalation of indoor dust 100 0.7 0.8 120 Commercial - - 0.5 120 Allotment 60 0.7 0.75 2400 Residential µg m -3 g g -1 - g.m -2 .s -1 /kg.m -3 Soil Loading Factor (SL) Transport Factor (TL) Fraction of Vegetative and Buildings (V) Air Dispersion Coefficient (Q/C) Land Use
Soil Parameters Changes in Standard Land Uses Effective air permeability is calculated using Equations A4 to A7 in Appendix A of the CLEA Report 7.54E-08 0.3509 0.1221 7.36E-03 0.07 0.54 0.24 0.3 1.18 Sand 3.05E-08 0.3201 0.0689 3.56E-03 0.12 0.53 0.33 0.2 1.21 Sandy Loam 1.05E-08 0.3078 0.0375 1.58E-03 0.18 0.58 0.440 0.14 1 Silt Loam 1.83E-08 0.3098 0.056 2.37E-03 0.15 0.53 0.37 0.16 1.2 Sandy Clay Loam 1.08E-08 0.3039 0.0437 1.51E-03 0.19 0.56 0.42 0.14 1.14 Clay Loam 7.28E-09 0.3072 0.0291 1.17E-03 0.21 0.58 0.5 0.1 1 Silty Clay Loam 7.18E-09 0.3155 0.0541 1.17E-03 0.26 0.63 0.51 0.12 0.94 Silty Clay 6.58E-09 0.2972 0.0385 9.93E-04 0.24 0.59 0.47 0.12 1.07 Clay dimensionless cm3 cm-3 cm 2 m  cm s -1 cm 3  cm -3 Total Water Air g cm -3 Effective Air Permeability van Genuchten Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Residual Water Content Porosity Bulk Density Soil Type
New USEPA Method to Calculate Total Skin Surface Area  Changes in Model Algorithms 476 ( 411 ) 476 ( 411 ) 0.08 0.08 1.785 160 70 16 to 65 873 ( 792 ) 688 ( 642 ) 0.33 0.26 0.794 110 19.7 5 to 6 822 ( 790 ) 657 ( 632 ) 0.35 0.28 0.704 100 16.9 4 to 5 742 ( 700 ) 593 ( 560 ) 0.35 0.28 0.636 90 15.1 3 to 4 620 ( 582 ) 485 ( 454 ) 0.32 0.25 0.582 90 12.7 2 to 3 533 ( 490 ) 420 ( 386 ) 0.33 0.26 0.484 80 9.8 1 to 2 366 ( 361 ) 297 ( 293 ) 0.32 0.26 0.343 70 5.6 0 to 1 cm 2 cm 2 - - Indoor Outdoor Indoor Outdoor m 2 cm kg Exposed Skin (SE in skin ) Exposed Skin (SE out skin ) Max Fraction of Exposed Skin (Φexp) Total Skin Surface Area (SA) Body Height (H) Body Weight (W) Age Class (year)
Preparation Factor (PF) – Soil Ingestion Attached to Vegetables Changes in Model Algorithms 0.6 0.001 0.157 Tree Fruit 0.6 0.001 0.166 Shrub Fruit 0.6 0.001 0.058 Herbaceous Fruit 1 0.001 0.21 Tuber Vegetables 1 0.001 0.103 Root Vegetables 0.2 0.001 0.096 Green Vegetables - (g g-1 FW) (g DW plant g-1 FW plant) Preparation Factor (PF) Soil Loading (SL) DW Conversion Factors (DW) Vegetable Type
Changes in Model Algorithms New Routine (USEPA Q/C) for Inhalation of Outdoor Vapours  For Surface Soil (10 cm) USEPA 1996 Q/C Model For Subsurface Soil (>10 cm) ASTM 2000 (E2081) GQRA DQRA Mass Balance Approach
Changes for Inhalation of Indoor Vapours  GQRA DQRA Case A (  d  > ED) Case B  (  d  < ED) Mass Balance Changes in Model Algorithms Calculating time  for source depletion 65 (including 15 cm foundation thickness) cm Depth to Top of Source 300 50 cm 3  s -1 Soil Gas Ingress Rate Commercial (Post 1970 Office + Sandy Soil) Residential  (Detached House  + Sandy Soil) Unit Parameters
Changes in Model Algorithms Complete New Plant Uptake Algorithms  35 Additional Plant Properties Introduced Beetroot, carrot, cassava, garlic, ginger, Jerusalem artichoke, leek, onion, parsnips, radish, rhubarb, salsify, swede, sweet potato, turnips and yam  Root Vegetables Aubergine, courgettes, cucumber, marrow, pumpkin, strawberries and tomatoes  Herbaceous Fruit Potatoes Tuber Vegetables Apples, apricot,  cherries, peaches, pears and plums Tree Fruit Bilberries, blackberries, cranberries, gooseberries, loganberries, mulberries, physalis, raspberries, blackcurrants, redcurrants and white currants Shrub Fruit Beans (broad, French, green and runner beans), cabbage (red, white, greens and kale), cauliflower, lettuce, spinach, peas (garden and mange tout), stem vegetables (broccoli, celery, asparagus), okra, global artichokes, Chinese leaves, endives, chicory, chard, dandelion, watercress and fresh herbs (basil, coriander, tarragon, sage, parsley and mint)  Green Vegetables CROPS INCLUDED PRODUCE GROUP
Complete New Plant Uptake Algorithms  Organic Compounds  Inorganic Compounds  Changes in Model Algorithms
Complete New Plant Uptake Algorithms  Changes in Model Algorithms Introduction of New Cross-Media Coefficients and Concentrations  Descriptions Unit Symbol Chemical Concentration in the Woody Stem mg cm -3  per mg g -1 C stem Chemical Concentration in Xylem Sap mg cm -3  per mg g -1 C xy Wood Water Partition Coefficients mg g -1  dw wood per mg cm -3  water K wood Rate of Chemical Flux into Potato Hour -1 k 1 Rate of Chemical Flux Out of Potato Hour -1 k 2 Diffusion Coefficients in Water m 2  s -1 Dw Equilibrium Partition Coefficient between Potato and Water cm 3  g -1  fw K pw Carbonhydrate-Water Partition Coefficients cm 3  g -1  fw K ch Equilibrium Partition Coefficient between Root and Water  cm 3  g -1  fw K rw Soil Leachate Partition Factor kg/l K sw Plant Media Transfer Coefficients and Concentrations
Complete New Plant Uptake Algorithms  Inorganic Compounds  Changes in Model Algorithms 0.5 Tree Fruit 0.5 Shrub Fruit 0.5 Herbaceous Fruit 0.5 Tuber Vegetables 0.5 Root Vegetables 0.5 Green Vegetables Fraction of chemicals in root system reaching edible plant plants (f int ) Vegetable Type 50 Selenium 5 Mercury 5 Chromium 5 Cadmium 5 Arsenic  Soil to Plant Availability Correction Contaminant
Complete New Plant Uptake Algorithms  Organic Compounds – Green Vegetable Changes in Model Algorithms Only Routine Retained from CLR10 (CLEA2002) CLEA UK
Complete New Plant Uptake Algorithms  Organic Compounds – Root Vegetable Changes in Model Algorithms Correction Coefficients for Roots - b Density Correction Factor between Water and Octanol - a Root Lipid Content g g -1 L Root Water Content g g -1 W First Order Metabolism Rate Constant d -1 k m First Order Growth Rate Constant d -1 k g Root Volume cm 3 V Plant Root Density g fw/cm 3  p Transpiration Stream Flow Rate cm 3  d -1 Q Descriptions Unit Symbol
Complete New Plant Uptake Algorithms  Organic Compounds – Tuber Vegetable Changes in Model Algorithms Descriptions Unit Symbol Radius of Potato m R Exponential Rate of Growth of Potato hour -1 k g Correction Coefficients for Roots - b Density Correction Factor between Water and Octanol - a Lipid Content of Potato g g -1 L Fraction of Carbonhydrates in the Potato - F ch Plant Tuber Density g/cm 3  p Water Content of Potato g g -1 W
Complete New Plant Uptake Algorithms  Organic Compounds – Tree Fruit Changes in Model Algorithms Descriptions Unit Symbol Dry Matter Content of Fruit g g -1 DM fruit Water Flow Rate per Unit of Mass of Fruit cm 3  g -1  fw Q fruit Mass of Fruit g fw M f Rate of Dilution due to Wood Growth year -1 k g Rate of Chemical Metabolism year -1 k e Mass of Woody Stem g dw M Transpiration Stream Flow Rate cm 3  d -1 Q
Summary of CLEA Testing
Summary of CLEA Testing Equation 9.6  Indoor Dust Equation 10.2 Outdoor Vapour
Summary of CLEA Testing
Way Forward Comparison of RBCA V2 and CLEA V1.03 beta
Thank you for your attention

More Related Content

Similar to Neclf RA Presentation

Long Term Monitoring Data 2013
Long Term Monitoring Data 2013Long Term Monitoring Data 2013
Long Term Monitoring Data 2013
James Peale
 
Climate change and Agriculture: Impact Aadaptation and Mitigation
Climate change and Agriculture: Impact Aadaptation and MitigationClimate change and Agriculture: Impact Aadaptation and Mitigation
Climate change and Agriculture: Impact Aadaptation and Mitigation
PragyaNaithani
 

Similar to Neclf RA Presentation (20)

C sequestration of a grazed permanent grasslands: uses of complementary metho...
C sequestration of a grazed permanent grasslands: uses of complementary metho...C sequestration of a grazed permanent grasslands: uses of complementary metho...
C sequestration of a grazed permanent grasslands: uses of complementary metho...
 
Sequestering Carbon in Soil
Sequestering Carbon in SoilSequestering Carbon in Soil
Sequestering Carbon in Soil
 
CLIMATE CHANGE AND CROP WATER PRODUCTIVITY - IMPACT AND MITIGATION
CLIMATE CHANGE AND CROP WATER PRODUCTIVITY - IMPACT AND MITIGATIONCLIMATE CHANGE AND CROP WATER PRODUCTIVITY - IMPACT AND MITIGATION
CLIMATE CHANGE AND CROP WATER PRODUCTIVITY - IMPACT AND MITIGATION
 
WW Concept for students.pptx
WW Concept for students.pptxWW Concept for students.pptx
WW Concept for students.pptx
 
Wastewater Concepts for students.pptx
Wastewater Concepts for students.pptxWastewater Concepts for students.pptx
Wastewater Concepts for students.pptx
 
Long Term Monitoring Data 2013
Long Term Monitoring Data 2013Long Term Monitoring Data 2013
Long Term Monitoring Data 2013
 
Greenhouse Gas Accounting: NCAS
Greenhouse Gas Accounting: NCASGreenhouse Gas Accounting: NCAS
Greenhouse Gas Accounting: NCAS
 
Japan 3 setting threshold and trends of reported data08.12.08
Japan 3   setting threshold and trends of reported data08.12.08Japan 3   setting threshold and trends of reported data08.12.08
Japan 3 setting threshold and trends of reported data08.12.08
 
Snehesh-Presentation-PDF
Snehesh-Presentation-PDFSnehesh-Presentation-PDF
Snehesh-Presentation-PDF
 
Dichio - Sostenibilità dei sistemi frutticoli
Dichio - Sostenibilità dei sistemi frutticoliDichio - Sostenibilità dei sistemi frutticoli
Dichio - Sostenibilità dei sistemi frutticoli
 
Disputation_VN3_short
Disputation_VN3_shortDisputation_VN3_short
Disputation_VN3_short
 
Elevated co2 influence on soil microbes
Elevated co2 influence on soil microbesElevated co2 influence on soil microbes
Elevated co2 influence on soil microbes
 
20320140506004 2
20320140506004 220320140506004 2
20320140506004 2
 
Membrana training
Membrana trainingMembrana training
Membrana training
 
Climate change and Agriculture: Impact Aadaptation and Mitigation
Climate change and Agriculture: Impact Aadaptation and MitigationClimate change and Agriculture: Impact Aadaptation and Mitigation
Climate change and Agriculture: Impact Aadaptation and Mitigation
 
Air Pollution Evs
Air Pollution EvsAir Pollution Evs
Air Pollution Evs
 
Application on Semi-aerobic Landfill. Technology in in Tropical Climate: Lysi...
Application on Semi-aerobic Landfill. Technology in in Tropical Climate: Lysi...Application on Semi-aerobic Landfill. Technology in in Tropical Climate: Lysi...
Application on Semi-aerobic Landfill. Technology in in Tropical Climate: Lysi...
 
Soil pollution on agricultural fields and other land uses
Soil pollution on agricultural fields and other land usesSoil pollution on agricultural fields and other land uses
Soil pollution on agricultural fields and other land uses
 
Chemtronics Green STP AD+
Chemtronics  Green STP AD+Chemtronics  Green STP AD+
Chemtronics Green STP AD+
 
Soil physical environment in relation to climate change
Soil physical environment in relation to climate changeSoil physical environment in relation to climate change
Soil physical environment in relation to climate change
 

Recently uploaded

Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Safe Software
 
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native ApplicationsArchitecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
WSO2
 
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
Victor Rentea
 

Recently uploaded (20)

Apidays New York 2024 - APIs in 2030: The Risk of Technological Sleepwalk by ...
Apidays New York 2024 - APIs in 2030: The Risk of Technological Sleepwalk by ...Apidays New York 2024 - APIs in 2030: The Risk of Technological Sleepwalk by ...
Apidays New York 2024 - APIs in 2030: The Risk of Technological Sleepwalk by ...
 
Emergent Methods: Multi-lingual narrative tracking in the news - real-time ex...
Emergent Methods: Multi-lingual narrative tracking in the news - real-time ex...Emergent Methods: Multi-lingual narrative tracking in the news - real-time ex...
Emergent Methods: Multi-lingual narrative tracking in the news - real-time ex...
 
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
2024: Domino Containers - The Next Step. News from the Domino Container commu...
 
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
Apidays New York 2024 - The Good, the Bad and the Governed by David O'Neill, ...
 
Ransomware_Q4_2023. The report. [EN].pdf
Ransomware_Q4_2023. The report. [EN].pdfRansomware_Q4_2023. The report. [EN].pdf
Ransomware_Q4_2023. The report. [EN].pdf
 
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone ProcessorsExploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
Exploring the Future Potential of AI-Enabled Smartphone Processors
 
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of TerraformAWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
AWS Community Day CPH - Three problems of Terraform
 
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FMECloud Frontiers:  A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
Cloud Frontiers: A Deep Dive into Serverless Spatial Data and FME
 
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
Axa Assurance Maroc - Insurer Innovation Award 2024
 
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native ApplicationsArchitecting Cloud Native Applications
Architecting Cloud Native Applications
 
Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024
Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024
Manulife - Insurer Transformation Award 2024
 
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
MINDCTI Revenue Release Quarter One 2024
 
Spring Boot vs Quarkus the ultimate battle - DevoxxUK
Spring Boot vs Quarkus the ultimate battle - DevoxxUKSpring Boot vs Quarkus the ultimate battle - DevoxxUK
Spring Boot vs Quarkus the ultimate battle - DevoxxUK
 
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectorsMS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
MS Copilot expands with MS Graph connectors
 
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data DiscoveryTrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
TrustArc Webinar - Unlock the Power of AI-Driven Data Discovery
 
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost SavingRepurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
Repurposing LNG terminals for Hydrogen Ammonia: Feasibility and Cost Saving
 
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWEREMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
EMPOWERMENT TECHNOLOGY GRADE 11 QUARTER 2 REVIEWER
 
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
Finding Java's Hidden Performance Traps @ DevoxxUK 2024
 
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ..."I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...
"I see eyes in my soup": How Delivery Hero implemented the safety system for ...
 
Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin WoodPolkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
Polkadot JAM Slides - Token2049 - By Dr. Gavin Wood
 

Neclf RA Presentation

  • 1. Updating UK Risk Assessment Guidance Dr. Mengfang Chen, Technical Director
  • 2.
  • 3. USEPA RAGS Tier 2 RBCA Toolkit ASTM E1739 Petroleum RBCA RBCA V1.0 ASTM P104 Chemical RBCA Marked the Start of CLEA CLEA 97 CLEA2000 CLEA2002 CLEA UK CLAN6/06 1989 1996 1999 1992 1997 2000 2002 2005 2006 Period of Development and Debate, and Continuing 2008 RBCA V2.01 2000 RBCA CLEA Plant Uptake Dermal Contact Indoor and Outdoor Vapours Probabilistic versus Deterministic Plant Uptake Vapour from Surface Soil Probabilistic versus Deterministic Plant Uptake Period of Development Period of Model Improvement and UK Compliance CLEA 97 CLEA UK CLEA V1.03 CLEA 2002 2008 CLEA V1.03 RBCA V1.3 ASTM E2081 Chemical RBCA CLEA RBCA History of CLEA Development
  • 4.
  • 5.
  • 6. Exposure Duration and Averaging Time Changes in Standard Land Uses 17885 49 years (Age Class 17) Working Adult Commercial 2190 6 years Age Class (1 to 6) Younger Child Allotments 2190 6 years (Age Class 1 to 6) Younger Child Residential Averaging Time (days) Exposure Duration (years) Critical Receptor Standard Land Use
  • 7. Exposure Frequencies Changes in Standard Land Uses Values in brackets are EF for ALLOTMENT where different from Resident Land use 170 230 170 230 - 230 17 (16 to 65) 365 (65) 365 (0) 365 (65) 365 (0) 365 365 (65) 6 (5 to 6) 365 (65) 365 (0) 365 (65) 365 (0) 365 365 (65) 5 (4 to 5) 365 (130) 365 (0) 365 (130) 365 (0) 365 365 (130) 4 (3 to 4) 365 (130) 365 (0) 365 (130) 365 (0) 365 365 (130) 3 (2 to 3) 365 (130) 365 (0) 365 (130) 365 (0) 365 365 (130) 2 (1 to 2) 365 (25) 365 (0) 180 (25) 180 (0) 180 180 (25) 1 (0 to 1) days /year Outdoor Inhalation Indoor Inhalation Dermal Outdoor Dermal Indoor Homegrown Produce Soil and Dust Ingestion Age Class (year)
  • 8. Building Parameters Changes in Standard Land Uses 0.165 (0.1647) 0.04 (0.0423) m 2 Floor Crack Area 0.15 0.15 m Foundation Thickness 4.4 3.1 Pa Pressure Difference between Soil and Indoor Air 1.0 0.5 hour -1 Air Exchange Rate 6.4 (9.6) 4.8 m Living Space Height 424 28 m 2 Footprint Area Commercial (Three-Storey Pre 1970 Office) Residential (Two-Storey Small Terrace House) Unit Parameters
  • 9. Consumption Rates and Home Grown Fractions Changes in Standard Land Uses 0.27 0.04 ( 0.22 ) 4.26 4.26 11.96 11.96 11.96 3.82 Tree Fruit 0.6 0.09 ( 0.35 ) 0.16 0.16 0.54 0.54 0.54 2.23 Shrub Fruit 0.4 0.06 ( 0.24 ) 1.85 1.85 3.96 3.96 3.96 1.83 Herbaceous Fruit 0.13 0.02 ( 0.12 ) 3.38 3.38 5.46 5.46 5.46 16.03 Tuber Vegetables 0.4 0.06 ( 0.38 ) 1.77 1.77 3.30 3.30 3.30 10.69 Root Vegetables 0.33 0.05 ( 0.39 ) 3.74 3.74 6.85 6.85 6.85 7.12 Green Vegetables Allotment Residential 5 to 6 4 to 5 3 to 4 2 to 3 1 to 2 0 to 1 Home Grown Fractions (HF) Consumption Rate (CR) (g FW kg -1 BW day -1 ) Vegetable Type
  • 10. Key Exposure Parameters Changes in Standard Land Uses 14.8 0.7 8.3 50 160 70 17 (16 to 65) 12.2 (24.9) 1 (3) 19 100 110 19.7 6 (5 to 6) 12.2 (21.3) 1 (3) 19 100 100 16.9 5 (4 to 5) 12.2 (19.1) 1 (3) 23 100 90 15.1 4 (3 to 4) 12.7 (20.7) 1 (3) 23 100 90 12.7 3 (2 to 3) 13.3 (18.8) 1 (3) 23 100 80 9.8 2 (1 to 2) 8.5 (10.3) 1 (3) 23 100 70 5.6 1 (0 to 1) m 3 /day Hour d -1 Hour d -1 mg/d cm kg Daily Inhalation Rate (V inh ) Outdoor Site Occupancy Period (T site ) Indoor Site Occupancy Period (T site ) Soil and Dust Ingestion Rate Body Height (H) Body Weight (BW) Age Class (year)
  • 11. Changes in Standard Land Uses Parameters Affecting Inhalation of Indoor and Outdoor Dust Q/C default values were taken from Newcastle representing areas of 0.01, 0.5 and 2 Ha Respectively for residential, allotment and commercial land uses TL and SL used to calculate intake rate for inhalation of indoor dust 100 0.7 0.8 120 Commercial - - 0.5 120 Allotment 60 0.7 0.75 2400 Residential µg m -3 g g -1 - g.m -2 .s -1 /kg.m -3 Soil Loading Factor (SL) Transport Factor (TL) Fraction of Vegetative and Buildings (V) Air Dispersion Coefficient (Q/C) Land Use
  • 12. Soil Parameters Changes in Standard Land Uses Effective air permeability is calculated using Equations A4 to A7 in Appendix A of the CLEA Report 7.54E-08 0.3509 0.1221 7.36E-03 0.07 0.54 0.24 0.3 1.18 Sand 3.05E-08 0.3201 0.0689 3.56E-03 0.12 0.53 0.33 0.2 1.21 Sandy Loam 1.05E-08 0.3078 0.0375 1.58E-03 0.18 0.58 0.440 0.14 1 Silt Loam 1.83E-08 0.3098 0.056 2.37E-03 0.15 0.53 0.37 0.16 1.2 Sandy Clay Loam 1.08E-08 0.3039 0.0437 1.51E-03 0.19 0.56 0.42 0.14 1.14 Clay Loam 7.28E-09 0.3072 0.0291 1.17E-03 0.21 0.58 0.5 0.1 1 Silty Clay Loam 7.18E-09 0.3155 0.0541 1.17E-03 0.26 0.63 0.51 0.12 0.94 Silty Clay 6.58E-09 0.2972 0.0385 9.93E-04 0.24 0.59 0.47 0.12 1.07 Clay dimensionless cm3 cm-3 cm 2 m  cm s -1 cm 3 cm -3 Total Water Air g cm -3 Effective Air Permeability van Genuchten Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity Residual Water Content Porosity Bulk Density Soil Type
  • 13. New USEPA Method to Calculate Total Skin Surface Area Changes in Model Algorithms 476 ( 411 ) 476 ( 411 ) 0.08 0.08 1.785 160 70 16 to 65 873 ( 792 ) 688 ( 642 ) 0.33 0.26 0.794 110 19.7 5 to 6 822 ( 790 ) 657 ( 632 ) 0.35 0.28 0.704 100 16.9 4 to 5 742 ( 700 ) 593 ( 560 ) 0.35 0.28 0.636 90 15.1 3 to 4 620 ( 582 ) 485 ( 454 ) 0.32 0.25 0.582 90 12.7 2 to 3 533 ( 490 ) 420 ( 386 ) 0.33 0.26 0.484 80 9.8 1 to 2 366 ( 361 ) 297 ( 293 ) 0.32 0.26 0.343 70 5.6 0 to 1 cm 2 cm 2 - - Indoor Outdoor Indoor Outdoor m 2 cm kg Exposed Skin (SE in skin ) Exposed Skin (SE out skin ) Max Fraction of Exposed Skin (Φexp) Total Skin Surface Area (SA) Body Height (H) Body Weight (W) Age Class (year)
  • 14. Preparation Factor (PF) – Soil Ingestion Attached to Vegetables Changes in Model Algorithms 0.6 0.001 0.157 Tree Fruit 0.6 0.001 0.166 Shrub Fruit 0.6 0.001 0.058 Herbaceous Fruit 1 0.001 0.21 Tuber Vegetables 1 0.001 0.103 Root Vegetables 0.2 0.001 0.096 Green Vegetables - (g g-1 FW) (g DW plant g-1 FW plant) Preparation Factor (PF) Soil Loading (SL) DW Conversion Factors (DW) Vegetable Type
  • 15. Changes in Model Algorithms New Routine (USEPA Q/C) for Inhalation of Outdoor Vapours For Surface Soil (10 cm) USEPA 1996 Q/C Model For Subsurface Soil (>10 cm) ASTM 2000 (E2081) GQRA DQRA Mass Balance Approach
  • 16. Changes for Inhalation of Indoor Vapours GQRA DQRA Case A (  d > ED) Case B (  d < ED) Mass Balance Changes in Model Algorithms Calculating time for source depletion 65 (including 15 cm foundation thickness) cm Depth to Top of Source 300 50 cm 3 s -1 Soil Gas Ingress Rate Commercial (Post 1970 Office + Sandy Soil) Residential (Detached House + Sandy Soil) Unit Parameters
  • 17. Changes in Model Algorithms Complete New Plant Uptake Algorithms 35 Additional Plant Properties Introduced Beetroot, carrot, cassava, garlic, ginger, Jerusalem artichoke, leek, onion, parsnips, radish, rhubarb, salsify, swede, sweet potato, turnips and yam Root Vegetables Aubergine, courgettes, cucumber, marrow, pumpkin, strawberries and tomatoes Herbaceous Fruit Potatoes Tuber Vegetables Apples, apricot, cherries, peaches, pears and plums Tree Fruit Bilberries, blackberries, cranberries, gooseberries, loganberries, mulberries, physalis, raspberries, blackcurrants, redcurrants and white currants Shrub Fruit Beans (broad, French, green and runner beans), cabbage (red, white, greens and kale), cauliflower, lettuce, spinach, peas (garden and mange tout), stem vegetables (broccoli, celery, asparagus), okra, global artichokes, Chinese leaves, endives, chicory, chard, dandelion, watercress and fresh herbs (basil, coriander, tarragon, sage, parsley and mint) Green Vegetables CROPS INCLUDED PRODUCE GROUP
  • 18. Complete New Plant Uptake Algorithms Organic Compounds Inorganic Compounds Changes in Model Algorithms
  • 19. Complete New Plant Uptake Algorithms Changes in Model Algorithms Introduction of New Cross-Media Coefficients and Concentrations Descriptions Unit Symbol Chemical Concentration in the Woody Stem mg cm -3 per mg g -1 C stem Chemical Concentration in Xylem Sap mg cm -3 per mg g -1 C xy Wood Water Partition Coefficients mg g -1 dw wood per mg cm -3 water K wood Rate of Chemical Flux into Potato Hour -1 k 1 Rate of Chemical Flux Out of Potato Hour -1 k 2 Diffusion Coefficients in Water m 2 s -1 Dw Equilibrium Partition Coefficient between Potato and Water cm 3 g -1 fw K pw Carbonhydrate-Water Partition Coefficients cm 3 g -1 fw K ch Equilibrium Partition Coefficient between Root and Water cm 3 g -1 fw K rw Soil Leachate Partition Factor kg/l K sw Plant Media Transfer Coefficients and Concentrations
  • 20. Complete New Plant Uptake Algorithms Inorganic Compounds Changes in Model Algorithms 0.5 Tree Fruit 0.5 Shrub Fruit 0.5 Herbaceous Fruit 0.5 Tuber Vegetables 0.5 Root Vegetables 0.5 Green Vegetables Fraction of chemicals in root system reaching edible plant plants (f int ) Vegetable Type 50 Selenium 5 Mercury 5 Chromium 5 Cadmium 5 Arsenic  Soil to Plant Availability Correction Contaminant
  • 21. Complete New Plant Uptake Algorithms Organic Compounds – Green Vegetable Changes in Model Algorithms Only Routine Retained from CLR10 (CLEA2002) CLEA UK
  • 22. Complete New Plant Uptake Algorithms Organic Compounds – Root Vegetable Changes in Model Algorithms Correction Coefficients for Roots - b Density Correction Factor between Water and Octanol - a Root Lipid Content g g -1 L Root Water Content g g -1 W First Order Metabolism Rate Constant d -1 k m First Order Growth Rate Constant d -1 k g Root Volume cm 3 V Plant Root Density g fw/cm 3  p Transpiration Stream Flow Rate cm 3 d -1 Q Descriptions Unit Symbol
  • 23. Complete New Plant Uptake Algorithms Organic Compounds – Tuber Vegetable Changes in Model Algorithms Descriptions Unit Symbol Radius of Potato m R Exponential Rate of Growth of Potato hour -1 k g Correction Coefficients for Roots - b Density Correction Factor between Water and Octanol - a Lipid Content of Potato g g -1 L Fraction of Carbonhydrates in the Potato - F ch Plant Tuber Density g/cm 3  p Water Content of Potato g g -1 W
  • 24. Complete New Plant Uptake Algorithms Organic Compounds – Tree Fruit Changes in Model Algorithms Descriptions Unit Symbol Dry Matter Content of Fruit g g -1 DM fruit Water Flow Rate per Unit of Mass of Fruit cm 3 g -1 fw Q fruit Mass of Fruit g fw M f Rate of Dilution due to Wood Growth year -1 k g Rate of Chemical Metabolism year -1 k e Mass of Woody Stem g dw M Transpiration Stream Flow Rate cm 3 d -1 Q
  • 25. Summary of CLEA Testing
  • 26. Summary of CLEA Testing Equation 9.6 Indoor Dust Equation 10.2 Outdoor Vapour
  • 27. Summary of CLEA Testing
  • 28. Way Forward Comparison of RBCA V2 and CLEA V1.03 beta
  • 29. Thank you for your attention