2. Designed to provide remedies for individuals harmed by others
Designed to manage social conflict
Designed to restore social harmony
Provides means by which disputes settled between private
parties can be resolved without use of force
Has own substantive and procedural law as well as precedent
3. Divided into four main categories:
Torts
Property law
Contract law
Family law
Juvenile law is also category of civil law (Chapter 8)
4. Complaint filed by plaintiff
Private party
Redress given in form of
Monetary damages
Injunctions
Specific performance
Penalty not inflicted by state
Can be filed in criminal and civil court for same act
5. Either party may appeal case outcome
So long as there is presence of adequate legal grounds
Burden of proof in civil trial:
Proof by preponderance of the evidence
More likely than not defendant committed wrongful act
Also use clear and convincing evidence
Punitive damages
Compensatory damages
Involuntary commitment
6. Burden of proof initially on plaintiff
If prima facie case is made, burden shifts to defendant (respondent)
Prima facie case may be rebutted
Some are beyond rebuttal
Res ipsa loquitor
Facts self-evident that negligence lies with defendant
Not necessary to prove additional details
Only about 6 percent of civil cases go before a jury
7. No exclusionary rule
No right to remain silent
Diminished right to cross-examine hostile witnesses
No legal obligation for states to provide attorney for indigent
defendants
8. Latin term tortus
Body of law associated with harm caused to plaintiff by action or
inaction of defendants
Not including breaches of contract
Determines what harm has been done and how best to remedy
such harm
Return plaintiff to position similar to one prior to harm
Damages awarded
Usually monetary
9. Constitutes majority of cases brought before American courts
Individual can be held liable for harm done in both civil and
criminal cases
No double jeopardy
Cannot bring suit against same person for same civil case
Res judicata
Not applicable in certain circumstances
10. Intentional acts
Defendant deliberately caused harm
Negligent acts
Defendant has duty to act in certain way; defendant breached duty;
harm resulted
Ordinary care standard
Lubitz v. Wells (1955)
Strict liability
Plaintiff need not prove defendant acted intentionally or negligently
11. Challenge causal and duty issues
Affirmative defenses
Contributory negligence
If injured party is partially responsible for injuries, they are barred from
recovering
Comparative negligence
Apportions responsibility
Consent and immunity (sovereign immunity)
Consent to being harmed by another
Judges cannot be sued for judicial decisions
12. Efforts to have legislation passed limiting frivolous lawsuits and
exorbitant punitive damages awarded by jurors
Driven by headline cases
Sue-happy tradition appears to have passed
13. Product of English common law
Protection of ownership rights
Property
Right of possession or ownership
Includes
Real
Personal
Intellectual
Pierson v. Post (1805)
City of Oakland v. Oakland Raiders (1980)
14. Interest are rights
Freehold estate
Fee simple estate
Possession ends at death
Fee simple absolute state
Possession does not revert to original owner at death
Tenancy in common
Non-freehold estates
Right to use property
15. Easement
Limited right to use property of another for specific purpose
Adverse possession
Generally affects only property abandoned by original owner
Very easy to prevent claim
Nuisance doctrine
Property owner may not use property in such way that it has
unreasonable, adverse effect on other property owners
Must keep property reasonably safe
16. Personal property
Any tangible item not connected to land
Movables
Can be transferred permanently or temporarily to another person
Bailment
When person transfers possession of one item to another person for
particular purpose with understanding it will be returned
Transfer of ownership, not possession
17. Governs conduct of business
Contracts
Legally enforceable promises
Breach of contract
When terms of contract are not met
Uniform Commercial Code
Standardizes trade and contract practices among merchants and
businesses
Codifies variety of already established principles by common law
18. 1. At least two parties
Two-party requirement
2. Must be capable of signing contract
Legal capacity requirement
3. Must agree to terms of contract in good faith
Assent requirement
4. Must have both a promise and consideration
Legality requirement
5. Can be either written or verbal
Sullivan v. O’Conner (1973)
National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & Bildisco (1984)
19. 1. At least two parties
Two-party requirement
2. Must be capable of signing contract
Legal capacity requirement
3. Must agree to terms of contract in good faith
Assent requirement
4. Must have both a promise and consideration
Legality requirement
5. Can be either written or verbal
Sullivan v. O’Conner (1973)
National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & Bildisco (1984)
20. Family is basic institution of any society
State is third party in every marriage
Family law designed to protect integrity of marriage
Conciliatory rather than accusatory
No necessary judgment of right or wrong
Focuses largely on entering into and dissolution of marriages
21. Requirements for marriage:
License from state
Possibly may need a blood test and waiting period
Vows must be made in presence of someone legally permitted to
acknowledge marriage
Marriage vows must be witnessed
22. Marriage is legal contract
Carries rights and responsibilities for both parties
Must meet certain requirements
Legal capacity
No mental deficiencies
Insanity
Being under the influence
No closely related people
Cannot be married to someone else
23. Reynolds v. United States (1878)
Skinner v. Oklahoma (1942)
Loving v. Virginia (1967)
Zablocki v. Redhail (1978)
Turner v. Safley (1987)
None of these cases changed the core definition of marriage as
union between a man and a woman
24. No country allowed for same-sex marriage at turn of 21st century
Netherlands was first in 2001
United States followed on June 26, 2015
Twentieth country to do so
Road to success for gays and lesbians difficult
Public opinion favoring validity of same-sex marriage more than
doubled from 27 percent in 1996 to 60 percent in 2015
25. Court has consistently declared right to marry as part of
fundamental “right to privacy”
Federal Defense of Marriage Act of 1996 (DOMA)
Passed by Congress
Stated that only same-sex couples could be married
Consistent with earlier decisions
In 2008, California Supreme Court ruled same-sex marriage
constitutional
Same year, voters in state passed Proposition 8
26. August of 2009
Lawsuit over both Prop 8 and DOMA (together in same case)
dismissed on jurisdictional grounds at federal district court level
February 7, 2012
Federal appeals court struck down California’s ban on gay marriage
May 30, 2012
Three-judge panel for First Circuit unanimously declared DOMA
unconstitutional
27. United States v. Windsor (2013)
Court struck down pivotal Section 3 part of DOMA
Restricting terms “marriage” and “spouse” to heterosexual union is
unconstitutional under due process clause of Fifth Amendment
Case did not establish constitutional right for same-sex marriage
Clear indication that Court was trending in favor of it
28. Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)
Court in 5-4 decision ruled that homosexual marriages are legal in
every state
Two issues before court in this case:
Does Fourteenth Amendment require state to license marriage between two
people of same sex?
Does Fourteenth Amendment require state to recognize marriage between
two people of same sex when marriage was lawfully licensed and performed
in another state?
Case combined cases from multiple states and had more than
twenty plaintiffs
29. Couples cohabitate and act in every way as though married
For period of time and maintaining certain criteria
Recognized as valid if states allow them
39 have abolished them
States recognize marriage to be legal contract
Those that recognize require individuals to abide by contractual
agreements in establishing relationship
Also may have to abide by dissolution requirements
30. Requires legal grounds
No-fault
No assumption of fault by either party
Fault
Adultery
Cruelty
Desertion
Insanity
Alcoholism
31. Legal declaration that not all requirements were met
Marriage never existed
Lack of legal consent
Impotence
Concealing a sexually transmitted disease
Concealing pregnancy from union with another person
32. Dissolution requires determining who gets what out of partnership
Statutes vary by state
Two dominant types of split
Dual property
All property
33. Custody
Based on custodial status of parents
Child support
Based on custodial status as well as income, costs of child rearing,
and other factors
Many states have complex formulas
34. Branch of law involving governmental administrative agencies
Agencies make, enforce, and adjudicate administrative law
Investigates complaints, conducts on-site inspections, and
requires annual reports
Combine government roles
Have huge impact on lives
35. Article 1, section 8 of U.S. Constitution
Grants Congress plenary power to regulate commerce
Prior to twentieth century
During twentieth century
36. Explosive growth in administrative/regulatory agencies since
1789
Interstate commerce Commission (ICC)
Created in 1887
Designed to respond to unfair railroad tariffs
Agencies grew rapidly under President F. D. Roosevelt in 1930s
Passing of Administrative Procedure Act (APA) of 1946
170 federal agencies today
37. Law created by agencies themselves
Similar to other laws in processes and procedures
Apply only to businesses and activities that fall under specific
area of responsibility of agency
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Has power to regulate activities related to stock exchange and
securities market
38. Create their own rules due to realization by Congress that only
they have specific knowledge pertaining to subject matter
Investigate violations of agency rules and devise ways to enforce
them
Settle most disputes informally by voluntary settlements
Can be settled in administrative court hearings
Chevron deference
39. Increase in concern since 1960s
Overseen by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Is an ideal that is difficult to obtain
First Earth Day in 1970
Environmental laws existed before 1960
Most effective passed after 1960s
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (1969)
Clean Air Act (1970)
Clean Water Act (1972)
40. Local police and prosecutors not trained to enforce environmental
laws, nor view them as priority
EPA
Largest regulatory agency
Divides enforcement tasks into three areas
Civil enforcement
Cleanup enforcement
Criminal enforcement
Most regulations (both federal and state) allow for both civil and
criminal enforcement
Agencies tend to pursue civil over criminal
41. Burns and Lynch (2004)
Support for environmental protection has waxed and waned
across presidential administrations since 1970
Nixon administration
Created EPA
Largely positive influence on environment
Carter administration
Provided mixed messages
42. Reagan administration
Pro-business/antiregulatory stance damaged EPA
George H. Bush administration
Mixed record much like Carter
G. W. Bush administration
Seen as worst on environmental issues
Obama administration
Entered office with “greenest” credentials
Has backtracked on many since entrance
Did kill Keystone XL pipeline
43. Primarily offenses committed by businesses
Many have far reaching health and safety effects
Defendants typically tried under principles of strict liability
Civil or criminal courts
Rylands v. Fletcher (1868)
United States v. Weitzenhoff (1994)
BP oil blowout in 2010
44. Agencies lack criminal enforcement powers beyond assessing
fines
Can refer to criminal prosecution
White-collar crimes absent from tally in Uniform Crime Reports
(UCR)
Financial Crimes Report
Provides separate account of white-collar crimes each year
45. Few corporate crooks recipients of truly meaningful sanctions in
past
Things beginning to change
Passing of Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOA) of 2002
Requires company chiefs to personally vouch for company’s financial
disclosures
White Collar Crimes Penalty Enhancement Act
Created new securities offenses with slightly enhanced penalties