SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 45
Chapter 7
 Designed to provide remedies for individuals harmed by others
 Designed to manage social conflict
 Designed to restore social harmony
 Provides means by which disputes settled between private
parties can be resolved without use of force
 Has own substantive and procedural law as well as precedent
 Divided into four main categories:
 Torts
 Property law
 Contract law
 Family law
 Juvenile law is also category of civil law (Chapter 8)
 Complaint filed by plaintiff
 Private party
 Redress given in form of
 Monetary damages
 Injunctions
 Specific performance
 Penalty not inflicted by state
 Can be filed in criminal and civil court for same act
 Either party may appeal case outcome
 So long as there is presence of adequate legal grounds
 Burden of proof in civil trial:
 Proof by preponderance of the evidence
 More likely than not defendant committed wrongful act
 Also use clear and convincing evidence
 Punitive damages
 Compensatory damages
 Involuntary commitment
 Burden of proof initially on plaintiff
 If prima facie case is made, burden shifts to defendant (respondent)
 Prima facie case may be rebutted
 Some are beyond rebuttal
 Res ipsa loquitor
 Facts self-evident that negligence lies with defendant
 Not necessary to prove additional details
 Only about 6 percent of civil cases go before a jury
 No exclusionary rule
 No right to remain silent
 Diminished right to cross-examine hostile witnesses
 No legal obligation for states to provide attorney for indigent
defendants
 Latin term tortus
 Body of law associated with harm caused to plaintiff by action or
inaction of defendants
 Not including breaches of contract
 Determines what harm has been done and how best to remedy
such harm
 Return plaintiff to position similar to one prior to harm
 Damages awarded
 Usually monetary
 Constitutes majority of cases brought before American courts
 Individual can be held liable for harm done in both civil and
criminal cases
 No double jeopardy
 Cannot bring suit against same person for same civil case
 Res judicata
 Not applicable in certain circumstances
 Intentional acts
 Defendant deliberately caused harm
 Negligent acts
 Defendant has duty to act in certain way; defendant breached duty;
harm resulted
 Ordinary care standard
 Lubitz v. Wells (1955)
 Strict liability
 Plaintiff need not prove defendant acted intentionally or negligently
 Challenge causal and duty issues
 Affirmative defenses
 Contributory negligence
 If injured party is partially responsible for injuries, they are barred from
recovering
 Comparative negligence
 Apportions responsibility
 Consent and immunity (sovereign immunity)
 Consent to being harmed by another
 Judges cannot be sued for judicial decisions
 Efforts to have legislation passed limiting frivolous lawsuits and
exorbitant punitive damages awarded by jurors
 Driven by headline cases
 Sue-happy tradition appears to have passed
 Product of English common law
 Protection of ownership rights
 Property
 Right of possession or ownership
 Includes
 Real
 Personal
 Intellectual
 Pierson v. Post (1805)
 City of Oakland v. Oakland Raiders (1980)
 Interest are rights
 Freehold estate
 Fee simple estate
 Possession ends at death
 Fee simple absolute state
 Possession does not revert to original owner at death
 Tenancy in common
 Non-freehold estates
 Right to use property
 Easement
 Limited right to use property of another for specific purpose
 Adverse possession
 Generally affects only property abandoned by original owner
 Very easy to prevent claim
 Nuisance doctrine
 Property owner may not use property in such way that it has
unreasonable, adverse effect on other property owners
 Must keep property reasonably safe
 Personal property
 Any tangible item not connected to land
 Movables
 Can be transferred permanently or temporarily to another person
 Bailment
 When person transfers possession of one item to another person for
particular purpose with understanding it will be returned
 Transfer of ownership, not possession
 Governs conduct of business
 Contracts
 Legally enforceable promises
 Breach of contract
 When terms of contract are not met
 Uniform Commercial Code
 Standardizes trade and contract practices among merchants and
businesses
 Codifies variety of already established principles by common law
1. At least two parties
 Two-party requirement
2. Must be capable of signing contract
 Legal capacity requirement
3. Must agree to terms of contract in good faith
 Assent requirement
4. Must have both a promise and consideration
 Legality requirement
5. Can be either written or verbal
 Sullivan v. O’Conner (1973)
 National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & Bildisco (1984)
1. At least two parties
 Two-party requirement
2. Must be capable of signing contract
 Legal capacity requirement
3. Must agree to terms of contract in good faith
 Assent requirement
4. Must have both a promise and consideration
 Legality requirement
5. Can be either written or verbal
 Sullivan v. O’Conner (1973)
 National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & Bildisco (1984)
 Family is basic institution of any society
 State is third party in every marriage
 Family law designed to protect integrity of marriage
 Conciliatory rather than accusatory
 No necessary judgment of right or wrong
 Focuses largely on entering into and dissolution of marriages
 Requirements for marriage:
 License from state
 Possibly may need a blood test and waiting period
 Vows must be made in presence of someone legally permitted to
acknowledge marriage
 Marriage vows must be witnessed
 Marriage is legal contract
 Carries rights and responsibilities for both parties
 Must meet certain requirements
 Legal capacity
 No mental deficiencies
 Insanity
 Being under the influence
 No closely related people
 Cannot be married to someone else
 Reynolds v. United States (1878)
 Skinner v. Oklahoma (1942)
 Loving v. Virginia (1967)
 Zablocki v. Redhail (1978)
 Turner v. Safley (1987)
 None of these cases changed the core definition of marriage as
union between a man and a woman
 No country allowed for same-sex marriage at turn of 21st century
 Netherlands was first in 2001
 United States followed on June 26, 2015
 Twentieth country to do so
 Road to success for gays and lesbians difficult
 Public opinion favoring validity of same-sex marriage more than
doubled from 27 percent in 1996 to 60 percent in 2015
 Court has consistently declared right to marry as part of
fundamental “right to privacy”
 Federal Defense of Marriage Act of 1996 (DOMA)
 Passed by Congress
 Stated that only same-sex couples could be married
 Consistent with earlier decisions
 In 2008, California Supreme Court ruled same-sex marriage
constitutional
 Same year, voters in state passed Proposition 8
 August of 2009
 Lawsuit over both Prop 8 and DOMA (together in same case)
dismissed on jurisdictional grounds at federal district court level
 February 7, 2012
 Federal appeals court struck down California’s ban on gay marriage
 May 30, 2012
 Three-judge panel for First Circuit unanimously declared DOMA
unconstitutional
 United States v. Windsor (2013)
 Court struck down pivotal Section 3 part of DOMA
 Restricting terms “marriage” and “spouse” to heterosexual union is
unconstitutional under due process clause of Fifth Amendment
 Case did not establish constitutional right for same-sex marriage
 Clear indication that Court was trending in favor of it
 Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)
 Court in 5-4 decision ruled that homosexual marriages are legal in
every state
 Two issues before court in this case:
 Does Fourteenth Amendment require state to license marriage between two
people of same sex?
 Does Fourteenth Amendment require state to recognize marriage between
two people of same sex when marriage was lawfully licensed and performed
in another state?
 Case combined cases from multiple states and had more than
twenty plaintiffs
 Couples cohabitate and act in every way as though married
 For period of time and maintaining certain criteria
 Recognized as valid if states allow them
 39 have abolished them
 States recognize marriage to be legal contract
 Those that recognize require individuals to abide by contractual
agreements in establishing relationship
 Also may have to abide by dissolution requirements
 Requires legal grounds
 No-fault
 No assumption of fault by either party
 Fault
 Adultery
 Cruelty
 Desertion
 Insanity
 Alcoholism
 Legal declaration that not all requirements were met
 Marriage never existed
 Lack of legal consent
 Impotence
 Concealing a sexually transmitted disease
 Concealing pregnancy from union with another person
 Dissolution requires determining who gets what out of partnership
 Statutes vary by state
 Two dominant types of split
 Dual property
 All property
 Custody
 Based on custodial status of parents
 Child support
 Based on custodial status as well as income, costs of child rearing,
and other factors
 Many states have complex formulas
 Branch of law involving governmental administrative agencies
 Agencies make, enforce, and adjudicate administrative law
 Investigates complaints, conducts on-site inspections, and
requires annual reports
 Combine government roles
 Have huge impact on lives
 Article 1, section 8 of U.S. Constitution
 Grants Congress plenary power to regulate commerce
 Prior to twentieth century
 During twentieth century
 Explosive growth in administrative/regulatory agencies since
1789
 Interstate commerce Commission (ICC)
 Created in 1887
 Designed to respond to unfair railroad tariffs
 Agencies grew rapidly under President F. D. Roosevelt in 1930s
 Passing of Administrative Procedure Act (APA) of 1946
 170 federal agencies today
 Law created by agencies themselves
 Similar to other laws in processes and procedures
 Apply only to businesses and activities that fall under specific
area of responsibility of agency
 Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
 Has power to regulate activities related to stock exchange and
securities market
 Create their own rules due to realization by Congress that only
they have specific knowledge pertaining to subject matter
 Investigate violations of agency rules and devise ways to enforce
them
 Settle most disputes informally by voluntary settlements
 Can be settled in administrative court hearings
 Chevron deference
 Increase in concern since 1960s
 Overseen by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
 Is an ideal that is difficult to obtain
 First Earth Day in 1970
 Environmental laws existed before 1960
 Most effective passed after 1960s
 National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (1969)
 Clean Air Act (1970)
 Clean Water Act (1972)
 Local police and prosecutors not trained to enforce environmental
laws, nor view them as priority
 EPA
 Largest regulatory agency
 Divides enforcement tasks into three areas
 Civil enforcement
 Cleanup enforcement
 Criminal enforcement
 Most regulations (both federal and state) allow for both civil and
criminal enforcement
 Agencies tend to pursue civil over criminal
 Burns and Lynch (2004)
 Support for environmental protection has waxed and waned
across presidential administrations since 1970
 Nixon administration
 Created EPA
 Largely positive influence on environment
 Carter administration
 Provided mixed messages
 Reagan administration
 Pro-business/antiregulatory stance damaged EPA
 George H. Bush administration
 Mixed record much like Carter
 G. W. Bush administration
 Seen as worst on environmental issues
 Obama administration
 Entered office with “greenest” credentials
 Has backtracked on many since entrance
 Did kill Keystone XL pipeline
 Primarily offenses committed by businesses
 Many have far reaching health and safety effects
 Defendants typically tried under principles of strict liability
 Civil or criminal courts
 Rylands v. Fletcher (1868)
 United States v. Weitzenhoff (1994)
 BP oil blowout in 2010
 Agencies lack criminal enforcement powers beyond assessing
fines
 Can refer to criminal prosecution
 White-collar crimes absent from tally in Uniform Crime Reports
(UCR)
 Financial Crimes Report
 Provides separate account of white-collar crimes each year
 Few corporate crooks recipients of truly meaningful sanctions in
past
 Things beginning to change
 Passing of Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOA) of 2002
 Requires company chiefs to personally vouch for company’s financial
disclosures
 White Collar Crimes Penalty Enhancement Act
 Created new securities offenses with slightly enhanced penalties

More Related Content

What's hot

Nature functions and_classification_of_law
Nature functions and_classification_of_lawNature functions and_classification_of_law
Nature functions and_classification_of_lawJaseme_Otoyo
 
Introduction to law and legal systems
Introduction to law and legal systemsIntroduction to law and legal systems
Introduction to law and legal systemsPriyanka Choudhary
 
Sistemas juridicos
Sistemas juridicos Sistemas juridicos
Sistemas juridicos elvergudillo
 
Logic 101 for Legal Reasoning
Logic 101 for Legal ReasoningLogic 101 for Legal Reasoning
Logic 101 for Legal ReasoningMichael Germano
 
Law Reform in Action - Native Title
Law Reform in Action -  Native TitleLaw Reform in Action -  Native Title
Law Reform in Action - Native TitleMr Shipp
 
The Bill Of Rights
The Bill Of RightsThe Bill Of Rights
The Bill Of RightsBryan Toth
 
La familia en la legislacion romana
La  familia en la legislacion romanaLa  familia en la legislacion romana
La familia en la legislacion romanaandreaaguayo123
 
Classification of Law
Classification of LawClassification of Law
Classification of LawMr Shipp
 
Principles of the Constitution
Principles of the ConstitutionPrinciples of the Constitution
Principles of the ConstitutionLina Nandy
 
U.S. Constitution
U.S. Constitution U.S. Constitution
U.S. Constitution atrantham
 
Law and Justice Chapter 2 power point
Law and Justice Chapter 2 power pointLaw and Justice Chapter 2 power point
Law and Justice Chapter 2 power pointmckenziewood
 
Chap10 Decision Support Systems
Chap10 Decision Support SystemsChap10 Decision Support Systems
Chap10 Decision Support SystemsAqib Syed
 
4a.law reform conditions
4a.law reform   conditions4a.law reform   conditions
4a.law reform conditionsHSCLegalStudies
 

What's hot (20)

Nature functions and_classification_of_law
Nature functions and_classification_of_lawNature functions and_classification_of_law
Nature functions and_classification_of_law
 
Introduction to law and legal systems
Introduction to law and legal systemsIntroduction to law and legal systems
Introduction to law and legal systems
 
Sistemas juridicos
Sistemas juridicos Sistemas juridicos
Sistemas juridicos
 
Law Reform - Mechanisms
Law Reform - MechanismsLaw Reform - Mechanisms
Law Reform - Mechanisms
 
Affirmative Action
Affirmative ActionAffirmative Action
Affirmative Action
 
Moral e direito
Moral e direitoMoral e direito
Moral e direito
 
Logic 101 for Legal Reasoning
Logic 101 for Legal ReasoningLogic 101 for Legal Reasoning
Logic 101 for Legal Reasoning
 
Law Reform in Action - Native Title
Law Reform in Action -  Native TitleLaw Reform in Action -  Native Title
Law Reform in Action - Native Title
 
The Bill Of Rights
The Bill Of RightsThe Bill Of Rights
The Bill Of Rights
 
Sistemas Juridicos
Sistemas JuridicosSistemas Juridicos
Sistemas Juridicos
 
La familia en la legislacion romana
La  familia en la legislacion romanaLa  familia en la legislacion romana
La familia en la legislacion romana
 
Classification of Law
Classification of LawClassification of Law
Classification of Law
 
Principles of the Constitution
Principles of the ConstitutionPrinciples of the Constitution
Principles of the Constitution
 
U.S. Constitution
U.S. Constitution U.S. Constitution
U.S. Constitution
 
Law and Justice Chapter 2 power point
Law and Justice Chapter 2 power pointLaw and Justice Chapter 2 power point
Law and Justice Chapter 2 power point
 
Chap10 Decision Support Systems
Chap10 Decision Support SystemsChap10 Decision Support Systems
Chap10 Decision Support Systems
 
Judicial precedent
Judicial precedentJudicial precedent
Judicial precedent
 
Ch 3 Federalism
Ch 3 FederalismCh 3 Federalism
Ch 3 Federalism
 
Government
GovernmentGovernment
Government
 
4a.law reform conditions
4a.law reform   conditions4a.law reform   conditions
4a.law reform conditions
 

Viewers also liked

Chapter 8 power point
Chapter 8 power pointChapter 8 power point
Chapter 8 power pointmckenziewood
 
Chapter 5 power point
Chapter 5 power pointChapter 5 power point
Chapter 5 power pointmckenziewood
 
Law and Justice Chapter 4 power point
Law and Justice Chapter 4 power pointLaw and Justice Chapter 4 power point
Law and Justice Chapter 4 power pointmckenziewood
 
Chapter 7 power point
Chapter 7 power pointChapter 7 power point
Chapter 7 power pointmikecalvert
 
PowerPoint Chapter 7 Notes
PowerPoint Chapter 7 NotesPowerPoint Chapter 7 Notes
PowerPoint Chapter 7 NotesM_Osier
 
Chapter 9 power point
Chapter 9 power pointChapter 9 power point
Chapter 9 power pointmckenziewood
 
Law and Justice Chapter 1 power point
Law and Justice Chapter 1 power pointLaw and Justice Chapter 1 power point
Law and Justice Chapter 1 power pointmckenziewood
 
The function and purpose of law power point
The function and purpose of law power pointThe function and purpose of law power point
The function and purpose of law power pointmckenziewood
 

Viewers also liked (9)

Chapter 8 power point
Chapter 8 power pointChapter 8 power point
Chapter 8 power point
 
Chapter 5 power point
Chapter 5 power pointChapter 5 power point
Chapter 5 power point
 
Law and Justice Chapter 4 power point
Law and Justice Chapter 4 power pointLaw and Justice Chapter 4 power point
Law and Justice Chapter 4 power point
 
Chapter 7 power point
Chapter 7 power pointChapter 7 power point
Chapter 7 power point
 
Chapter 07
Chapter 07Chapter 07
Chapter 07
 
PowerPoint Chapter 7 Notes
PowerPoint Chapter 7 NotesPowerPoint Chapter 7 Notes
PowerPoint Chapter 7 Notes
 
Chapter 9 power point
Chapter 9 power pointChapter 9 power point
Chapter 9 power point
 
Law and Justice Chapter 1 power point
Law and Justice Chapter 1 power pointLaw and Justice Chapter 1 power point
Law and Justice Chapter 1 power point
 
The function and purpose of law power point
The function and purpose of law power pointThe function and purpose of law power point
The function and purpose of law power point
 

Similar to Chapter 7 power point

Similar to Chapter 7 power point (20)

Walsh power point_chapter 7
Walsh power point_chapter 7Walsh power point_chapter 7
Walsh power point_chapter 7
 
Goal 5 ppt
Goal 5 pptGoal 5 ppt
Goal 5 ppt
 
Goal 5
Goal 5Goal 5
Goal 5
 
Plea and bargaing PPT for Presentation !!!
Plea and bargaing PPT for Presentation !!!Plea and bargaing PPT for Presentation !!!
Plea and bargaing PPT for Presentation !!!
 
2.2 consequences of separation
2.2 consequences of separation2.2 consequences of separation
2.2 consequences of separation
 
Divorce information and worksheet
Divorce information and worksheetDivorce information and worksheet
Divorce information and worksheet
 
[Type text][Type text][Type text] 1Running Head Disci.docx
[Type text][Type text][Type text]   1Running Head Disci.docx[Type text][Type text][Type text]   1Running Head Disci.docx
[Type text][Type text][Type text] 1Running Head Disci.docx
 
The Courts Take 2
The Courts Take 2The Courts Take 2
The Courts Take 2
 
The Courts
The CourtsThe Courts
The Courts
 
The Courts
The CourtsThe Courts
The Courts
 
US Judicial System Report
US Judicial System ReportUS Judicial System Report
US Judicial System Report
 
Sentencia matrimonio gay New Jersey
Sentencia matrimonio gay  New JerseySentencia matrimonio gay  New Jersey
Sentencia matrimonio gay New Jersey
 
LAWN666 Family Law.docx
LAWN666 Family Law.docxLAWN666 Family Law.docx
LAWN666 Family Law.docx
 
Intro to u.s. law prof. betsy candlersummer 2018class
Intro to u.s. law prof. betsy candlersummer 2018class Intro to u.s. law prof. betsy candlersummer 2018class
Intro to u.s. law prof. betsy candlersummer 2018class
 
Jurisdiction Under Private International Law.pdf
Jurisdiction Under Private International Law.pdfJurisdiction Under Private International Law.pdf
Jurisdiction Under Private International Law.pdf
 
Chapter 8
Chapter 8Chapter 8
Chapter 8
 
Legal Limbo
Legal LimboLegal Limbo
Legal Limbo
 
Family law preso
Family law presoFamily law preso
Family law preso
 
Business Law Essays
Business Law EssaysBusiness Law Essays
Business Law Essays
 
T1, 2021 business law lecture 4 - contracts 3
T1, 2021 business law   lecture 4 - contracts 3T1, 2021 business law   lecture 4 - contracts 3
T1, 2021 business law lecture 4 - contracts 3
 

More from mckenziewood

Chapter 14 power point
Chapter 14 power pointChapter 14 power point
Chapter 14 power pointmckenziewood
 
Chapter 13 power point
Chapter 13 power pointChapter 13 power point
Chapter 13 power pointmckenziewood
 
Chapter 10 power point
Chapter 10 power pointChapter 10 power point
Chapter 10 power pointmckenziewood
 
Corrections chapter 13 ppt
Corrections chapter 13 pptCorrections chapter 13 ppt
Corrections chapter 13 pptmckenziewood
 
Corrections chapter 12 ppt
Corrections chapter 12 pptCorrections chapter 12 ppt
Corrections chapter 12 pptmckenziewood
 
Corrections chapter 10 ppt
Corrections chapter 10 pptCorrections chapter 10 ppt
Corrections chapter 10 pptmckenziewood
 
Corrections chapter 11 ppt
Corrections chapter 11 pptCorrections chapter 11 ppt
Corrections chapter 11 pptmckenziewood
 
Corrections chapter 9 ppt
Corrections chapter 9 pptCorrections chapter 9 ppt
Corrections chapter 9 pptmckenziewood
 
Corrections chapter 8 ppt
Corrections chapter 8 pptCorrections chapter 8 ppt
Corrections chapter 8 pptmckenziewood
 
Corrections chapter 7 ppt
Corrections chapter 7 pptCorrections chapter 7 ppt
Corrections chapter 7 pptmckenziewood
 
Corrections chapter 6 ppt
Corrections chapter 6 pptCorrections chapter 6 ppt
Corrections chapter 6 pptmckenziewood
 
Corrections chapter 5 ppt
Corrections chapter 5 pptCorrections chapter 5 ppt
Corrections chapter 5 pptmckenziewood
 
Corrections chapter 4 ppt
Corrections chapter 4 pptCorrections chapter 4 ppt
Corrections chapter 4 pptmckenziewood
 
Corrections chapter 3 ppt
Corrections chapter 3 pptCorrections chapter 3 ppt
Corrections chapter 3 pptmckenziewood
 
Corrections chapter 2 ppt
Corrections chapter 2 pptCorrections chapter 2 ppt
Corrections chapter 2 pptmckenziewood
 
Corrections chapter 1 ppt
Corrections chapter 1 pptCorrections chapter 1 ppt
Corrections chapter 1 pptmckenziewood
 
Chapter 3 power point
Chapter 3 power pointChapter 3 power point
Chapter 3 power pointmckenziewood
 
Chapter 2 power point
Chapter 2 power pointChapter 2 power point
Chapter 2 power pointmckenziewood
 
Chapter 1 power point
Chapter 1 power pointChapter 1 power point
Chapter 1 power pointmckenziewood
 

More from mckenziewood (19)

Chapter 14 power point
Chapter 14 power pointChapter 14 power point
Chapter 14 power point
 
Chapter 13 power point
Chapter 13 power pointChapter 13 power point
Chapter 13 power point
 
Chapter 10 power point
Chapter 10 power pointChapter 10 power point
Chapter 10 power point
 
Corrections chapter 13 ppt
Corrections chapter 13 pptCorrections chapter 13 ppt
Corrections chapter 13 ppt
 
Corrections chapter 12 ppt
Corrections chapter 12 pptCorrections chapter 12 ppt
Corrections chapter 12 ppt
 
Corrections chapter 10 ppt
Corrections chapter 10 pptCorrections chapter 10 ppt
Corrections chapter 10 ppt
 
Corrections chapter 11 ppt
Corrections chapter 11 pptCorrections chapter 11 ppt
Corrections chapter 11 ppt
 
Corrections chapter 9 ppt
Corrections chapter 9 pptCorrections chapter 9 ppt
Corrections chapter 9 ppt
 
Corrections chapter 8 ppt
Corrections chapter 8 pptCorrections chapter 8 ppt
Corrections chapter 8 ppt
 
Corrections chapter 7 ppt
Corrections chapter 7 pptCorrections chapter 7 ppt
Corrections chapter 7 ppt
 
Corrections chapter 6 ppt
Corrections chapter 6 pptCorrections chapter 6 ppt
Corrections chapter 6 ppt
 
Corrections chapter 5 ppt
Corrections chapter 5 pptCorrections chapter 5 ppt
Corrections chapter 5 ppt
 
Corrections chapter 4 ppt
Corrections chapter 4 pptCorrections chapter 4 ppt
Corrections chapter 4 ppt
 
Corrections chapter 3 ppt
Corrections chapter 3 pptCorrections chapter 3 ppt
Corrections chapter 3 ppt
 
Corrections chapter 2 ppt
Corrections chapter 2 pptCorrections chapter 2 ppt
Corrections chapter 2 ppt
 
Corrections chapter 1 ppt
Corrections chapter 1 pptCorrections chapter 1 ppt
Corrections chapter 1 ppt
 
Chapter 3 power point
Chapter 3 power pointChapter 3 power point
Chapter 3 power point
 
Chapter 2 power point
Chapter 2 power pointChapter 2 power point
Chapter 2 power point
 
Chapter 1 power point
Chapter 1 power pointChapter 1 power point
Chapter 1 power point
 

Recently uploaded

如何办理密德萨斯大学毕业证(本硕)Middlesex学位证书
如何办理密德萨斯大学毕业证(本硕)Middlesex学位证书如何办理密德萨斯大学毕业证(本硕)Middlesex学位证书
如何办理密德萨斯大学毕业证(本硕)Middlesex学位证书FS LS
 
如何办理(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证学位证书SD DS
 
Arbitration, mediation and conciliation in India
Arbitration, mediation and conciliation in IndiaArbitration, mediation and conciliation in India
Arbitration, mediation and conciliation in IndiaNafiaNazim
 
定制(WMU毕业证书)美国西密歇根大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(WMU毕业证书)美国西密歇根大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一定制(WMU毕业证书)美国西密歇根大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(WMU毕业证书)美国西密歇根大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一jr6r07mb
 
如何办理纽约州立大学石溪分校毕业证学位证书
 如何办理纽约州立大学石溪分校毕业证学位证书 如何办理纽约州立大学石溪分校毕业证学位证书
如何办理纽约州立大学石溪分校毕业证学位证书Fir sss
 
如何办理(SFSta文凭证书)美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(SFSta文凭证书)美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(SFSta文凭证书)美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(SFSta文凭证书)美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书Fs Las
 
FINALTRUEENFORCEMENT OF BARANGAY SETTLEMENT.ppt
FINALTRUEENFORCEMENT OF BARANGAY SETTLEMENT.pptFINALTRUEENFORCEMENT OF BARANGAY SETTLEMENT.ppt
FINALTRUEENFORCEMENT OF BARANGAY SETTLEMENT.pptjudeplata
 
国外大学毕业证《奥克兰大学毕业证办理成绩单GPA修改》
国外大学毕业证《奥克兰大学毕业证办理成绩单GPA修改》国外大学毕业证《奥克兰大学毕业证办理成绩单GPA修改》
国外大学毕业证《奥克兰大学毕业证办理成绩单GPA修改》o8wvnojp
 
昆士兰科技大学毕业证学位证成绩单-补办步骤澳洲毕业证书
昆士兰科技大学毕业证学位证成绩单-补办步骤澳洲毕业证书昆士兰科技大学毕业证学位证成绩单-补办步骤澳洲毕业证书
昆士兰科技大学毕业证学位证成绩单-补办步骤澳洲毕业证书1k98h0e1
 
如何办理(UCD毕业证书)加州大学戴维斯分校毕业证学位证书
如何办理(UCD毕业证书)加州大学戴维斯分校毕业证学位证书如何办理(UCD毕业证书)加州大学戴维斯分校毕业证学位证书
如何办理(UCD毕业证书)加州大学戴维斯分校毕业证学位证书SD DS
 
如何办理(ISU毕业证书)爱荷华州立大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(ISU毕业证书)爱荷华州立大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(ISU毕业证书)爱荷华州立大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(ISU毕业证书)爱荷华州立大学毕业证学位证书SD DS
 
An Analysis of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955
An Analysis of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955An Analysis of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955
An Analysis of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955Abheet Mangleek
 
POLICE ACT, 1861 the details about police system.pptx
POLICE ACT, 1861 the details about police system.pptxPOLICE ACT, 1861 the details about police system.pptx
POLICE ACT, 1861 the details about police system.pptxAbhishekchatterjee248859
 
Vanderburgh County Sheriff says he will Not Raid Delta 8 Shops
Vanderburgh County Sheriff says he will Not Raid Delta 8 ShopsVanderburgh County Sheriff says he will Not Raid Delta 8 Shops
Vanderburgh County Sheriff says he will Not Raid Delta 8 ShopsAbdul-Hakim Shabazz
 
定制(BU文凭证书)美国波士顿大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(BU文凭证书)美国波士顿大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一定制(BU文凭证书)美国波士顿大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(BU文凭证书)美国波士顿大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一st Las
 
如何办理新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕)NTU学位证书
如何办理新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕)NTU学位证书如何办理新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕)NTU学位证书
如何办理新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕)NTU学位证书Fir L
 
如何办理(UNK毕业证书)内布拉斯加大学卡尼尔分校毕业证学位证书
如何办理(UNK毕业证书)内布拉斯加大学卡尼尔分校毕业证学位证书如何办理(UNK毕业证书)内布拉斯加大学卡尼尔分校毕业证学位证书
如何办理(UNK毕业证书)内布拉斯加大学卡尼尔分校毕业证学位证书SD DS
 
Constitutional Values & Fundamental Principles of the ConstitutionPPT.pptx
Constitutional Values & Fundamental Principles of the ConstitutionPPT.pptxConstitutional Values & Fundamental Principles of the ConstitutionPPT.pptx
Constitutional Values & Fundamental Principles of the ConstitutionPPT.pptxsrikarna235
 
Model Call Girl in Haqiqat Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝8264348440🔝
Model Call Girl in Haqiqat Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝8264348440🔝Model Call Girl in Haqiqat Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝8264348440🔝
Model Call Girl in Haqiqat Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝8264348440🔝soniya singh
 
Legal Alert - Vietnam - First draft Decree on mechanisms and policies to enco...
Legal Alert - Vietnam - First draft Decree on mechanisms and policies to enco...Legal Alert - Vietnam - First draft Decree on mechanisms and policies to enco...
Legal Alert - Vietnam - First draft Decree on mechanisms and policies to enco...Dr. Oliver Massmann
 

Recently uploaded (20)

如何办理密德萨斯大学毕业证(本硕)Middlesex学位证书
如何办理密德萨斯大学毕业证(本硕)Middlesex学位证书如何办理密德萨斯大学毕业证(本硕)Middlesex学位证书
如何办理密德萨斯大学毕业证(本硕)Middlesex学位证书
 
如何办理(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(CQU毕业证书)中央昆士兰大学毕业证学位证书
 
Arbitration, mediation and conciliation in India
Arbitration, mediation and conciliation in IndiaArbitration, mediation and conciliation in India
Arbitration, mediation and conciliation in India
 
定制(WMU毕业证书)美国西密歇根大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(WMU毕业证书)美国西密歇根大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一定制(WMU毕业证书)美国西密歇根大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(WMU毕业证书)美国西密歇根大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
 
如何办理纽约州立大学石溪分校毕业证学位证书
 如何办理纽约州立大学石溪分校毕业证学位证书 如何办理纽约州立大学石溪分校毕业证学位证书
如何办理纽约州立大学石溪分校毕业证学位证书
 
如何办理(SFSta文凭证书)美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(SFSta文凭证书)美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(SFSta文凭证书)美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(SFSta文凭证书)美国旧金山州立大学毕业证学位证书
 
FINALTRUEENFORCEMENT OF BARANGAY SETTLEMENT.ppt
FINALTRUEENFORCEMENT OF BARANGAY SETTLEMENT.pptFINALTRUEENFORCEMENT OF BARANGAY SETTLEMENT.ppt
FINALTRUEENFORCEMENT OF BARANGAY SETTLEMENT.ppt
 
国外大学毕业证《奥克兰大学毕业证办理成绩单GPA修改》
国外大学毕业证《奥克兰大学毕业证办理成绩单GPA修改》国外大学毕业证《奥克兰大学毕业证办理成绩单GPA修改》
国外大学毕业证《奥克兰大学毕业证办理成绩单GPA修改》
 
昆士兰科技大学毕业证学位证成绩单-补办步骤澳洲毕业证书
昆士兰科技大学毕业证学位证成绩单-补办步骤澳洲毕业证书昆士兰科技大学毕业证学位证成绩单-补办步骤澳洲毕业证书
昆士兰科技大学毕业证学位证成绩单-补办步骤澳洲毕业证书
 
如何办理(UCD毕业证书)加州大学戴维斯分校毕业证学位证书
如何办理(UCD毕业证书)加州大学戴维斯分校毕业证学位证书如何办理(UCD毕业证书)加州大学戴维斯分校毕业证学位证书
如何办理(UCD毕业证书)加州大学戴维斯分校毕业证学位证书
 
如何办理(ISU毕业证书)爱荷华州立大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(ISU毕业证书)爱荷华州立大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(ISU毕业证书)爱荷华州立大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(ISU毕业证书)爱荷华州立大学毕业证学位证书
 
An Analysis of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955
An Analysis of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955An Analysis of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955
An Analysis of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955
 
POLICE ACT, 1861 the details about police system.pptx
POLICE ACT, 1861 the details about police system.pptxPOLICE ACT, 1861 the details about police system.pptx
POLICE ACT, 1861 the details about police system.pptx
 
Vanderburgh County Sheriff says he will Not Raid Delta 8 Shops
Vanderburgh County Sheriff says he will Not Raid Delta 8 ShopsVanderburgh County Sheriff says he will Not Raid Delta 8 Shops
Vanderburgh County Sheriff says he will Not Raid Delta 8 Shops
 
定制(BU文凭证书)美国波士顿大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(BU文凭证书)美国波士顿大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一定制(BU文凭证书)美国波士顿大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
定制(BU文凭证书)美国波士顿大学毕业证成绩单原版一比一
 
如何办理新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕)NTU学位证书
如何办理新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕)NTU学位证书如何办理新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕)NTU学位证书
如何办理新加坡南洋理工大学毕业证(本硕)NTU学位证书
 
如何办理(UNK毕业证书)内布拉斯加大学卡尼尔分校毕业证学位证书
如何办理(UNK毕业证书)内布拉斯加大学卡尼尔分校毕业证学位证书如何办理(UNK毕业证书)内布拉斯加大学卡尼尔分校毕业证学位证书
如何办理(UNK毕业证书)内布拉斯加大学卡尼尔分校毕业证学位证书
 
Constitutional Values & Fundamental Principles of the ConstitutionPPT.pptx
Constitutional Values & Fundamental Principles of the ConstitutionPPT.pptxConstitutional Values & Fundamental Principles of the ConstitutionPPT.pptx
Constitutional Values & Fundamental Principles of the ConstitutionPPT.pptx
 
Model Call Girl in Haqiqat Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝8264348440🔝
Model Call Girl in Haqiqat Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝8264348440🔝Model Call Girl in Haqiqat Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝8264348440🔝
Model Call Girl in Haqiqat Nagar Delhi reach out to us at 🔝8264348440🔝
 
Legal Alert - Vietnam - First draft Decree on mechanisms and policies to enco...
Legal Alert - Vietnam - First draft Decree on mechanisms and policies to enco...Legal Alert - Vietnam - First draft Decree on mechanisms and policies to enco...
Legal Alert - Vietnam - First draft Decree on mechanisms and policies to enco...
 

Chapter 7 power point

  • 2.  Designed to provide remedies for individuals harmed by others  Designed to manage social conflict  Designed to restore social harmony  Provides means by which disputes settled between private parties can be resolved without use of force  Has own substantive and procedural law as well as precedent
  • 3.  Divided into four main categories:  Torts  Property law  Contract law  Family law  Juvenile law is also category of civil law (Chapter 8)
  • 4.  Complaint filed by plaintiff  Private party  Redress given in form of  Monetary damages  Injunctions  Specific performance  Penalty not inflicted by state  Can be filed in criminal and civil court for same act
  • 5.  Either party may appeal case outcome  So long as there is presence of adequate legal grounds  Burden of proof in civil trial:  Proof by preponderance of the evidence  More likely than not defendant committed wrongful act  Also use clear and convincing evidence  Punitive damages  Compensatory damages  Involuntary commitment
  • 6.  Burden of proof initially on plaintiff  If prima facie case is made, burden shifts to defendant (respondent)  Prima facie case may be rebutted  Some are beyond rebuttal  Res ipsa loquitor  Facts self-evident that negligence lies with defendant  Not necessary to prove additional details  Only about 6 percent of civil cases go before a jury
  • 7.  No exclusionary rule  No right to remain silent  Diminished right to cross-examine hostile witnesses  No legal obligation for states to provide attorney for indigent defendants
  • 8.  Latin term tortus  Body of law associated with harm caused to plaintiff by action or inaction of defendants  Not including breaches of contract  Determines what harm has been done and how best to remedy such harm  Return plaintiff to position similar to one prior to harm  Damages awarded  Usually monetary
  • 9.  Constitutes majority of cases brought before American courts  Individual can be held liable for harm done in both civil and criminal cases  No double jeopardy  Cannot bring suit against same person for same civil case  Res judicata  Not applicable in certain circumstances
  • 10.  Intentional acts  Defendant deliberately caused harm  Negligent acts  Defendant has duty to act in certain way; defendant breached duty; harm resulted  Ordinary care standard  Lubitz v. Wells (1955)  Strict liability  Plaintiff need not prove defendant acted intentionally or negligently
  • 11.  Challenge causal and duty issues  Affirmative defenses  Contributory negligence  If injured party is partially responsible for injuries, they are barred from recovering  Comparative negligence  Apportions responsibility  Consent and immunity (sovereign immunity)  Consent to being harmed by another  Judges cannot be sued for judicial decisions
  • 12.  Efforts to have legislation passed limiting frivolous lawsuits and exorbitant punitive damages awarded by jurors  Driven by headline cases  Sue-happy tradition appears to have passed
  • 13.  Product of English common law  Protection of ownership rights  Property  Right of possession or ownership  Includes  Real  Personal  Intellectual  Pierson v. Post (1805)  City of Oakland v. Oakland Raiders (1980)
  • 14.  Interest are rights  Freehold estate  Fee simple estate  Possession ends at death  Fee simple absolute state  Possession does not revert to original owner at death  Tenancy in common  Non-freehold estates  Right to use property
  • 15.  Easement  Limited right to use property of another for specific purpose  Adverse possession  Generally affects only property abandoned by original owner  Very easy to prevent claim  Nuisance doctrine  Property owner may not use property in such way that it has unreasonable, adverse effect on other property owners  Must keep property reasonably safe
  • 16.  Personal property  Any tangible item not connected to land  Movables  Can be transferred permanently or temporarily to another person  Bailment  When person transfers possession of one item to another person for particular purpose with understanding it will be returned  Transfer of ownership, not possession
  • 17.  Governs conduct of business  Contracts  Legally enforceable promises  Breach of contract  When terms of contract are not met  Uniform Commercial Code  Standardizes trade and contract practices among merchants and businesses  Codifies variety of already established principles by common law
  • 18. 1. At least two parties  Two-party requirement 2. Must be capable of signing contract  Legal capacity requirement 3. Must agree to terms of contract in good faith  Assent requirement 4. Must have both a promise and consideration  Legality requirement 5. Can be either written or verbal  Sullivan v. O’Conner (1973)  National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & Bildisco (1984)
  • 19. 1. At least two parties  Two-party requirement 2. Must be capable of signing contract  Legal capacity requirement 3. Must agree to terms of contract in good faith  Assent requirement 4. Must have both a promise and consideration  Legality requirement 5. Can be either written or verbal  Sullivan v. O’Conner (1973)  National Labor Relations Board v. Bildisco & Bildisco (1984)
  • 20.  Family is basic institution of any society  State is third party in every marriage  Family law designed to protect integrity of marriage  Conciliatory rather than accusatory  No necessary judgment of right or wrong  Focuses largely on entering into and dissolution of marriages
  • 21.  Requirements for marriage:  License from state  Possibly may need a blood test and waiting period  Vows must be made in presence of someone legally permitted to acknowledge marriage  Marriage vows must be witnessed
  • 22.  Marriage is legal contract  Carries rights and responsibilities for both parties  Must meet certain requirements  Legal capacity  No mental deficiencies  Insanity  Being under the influence  No closely related people  Cannot be married to someone else
  • 23.  Reynolds v. United States (1878)  Skinner v. Oklahoma (1942)  Loving v. Virginia (1967)  Zablocki v. Redhail (1978)  Turner v. Safley (1987)  None of these cases changed the core definition of marriage as union between a man and a woman
  • 24.  No country allowed for same-sex marriage at turn of 21st century  Netherlands was first in 2001  United States followed on June 26, 2015  Twentieth country to do so  Road to success for gays and lesbians difficult  Public opinion favoring validity of same-sex marriage more than doubled from 27 percent in 1996 to 60 percent in 2015
  • 25.  Court has consistently declared right to marry as part of fundamental “right to privacy”  Federal Defense of Marriage Act of 1996 (DOMA)  Passed by Congress  Stated that only same-sex couples could be married  Consistent with earlier decisions  In 2008, California Supreme Court ruled same-sex marriage constitutional  Same year, voters in state passed Proposition 8
  • 26.  August of 2009  Lawsuit over both Prop 8 and DOMA (together in same case) dismissed on jurisdictional grounds at federal district court level  February 7, 2012  Federal appeals court struck down California’s ban on gay marriage  May 30, 2012  Three-judge panel for First Circuit unanimously declared DOMA unconstitutional
  • 27.  United States v. Windsor (2013)  Court struck down pivotal Section 3 part of DOMA  Restricting terms “marriage” and “spouse” to heterosexual union is unconstitutional under due process clause of Fifth Amendment  Case did not establish constitutional right for same-sex marriage  Clear indication that Court was trending in favor of it
  • 28.  Obergefell v. Hodges (2015)  Court in 5-4 decision ruled that homosexual marriages are legal in every state  Two issues before court in this case:  Does Fourteenth Amendment require state to license marriage between two people of same sex?  Does Fourteenth Amendment require state to recognize marriage between two people of same sex when marriage was lawfully licensed and performed in another state?  Case combined cases from multiple states and had more than twenty plaintiffs
  • 29.  Couples cohabitate and act in every way as though married  For period of time and maintaining certain criteria  Recognized as valid if states allow them  39 have abolished them  States recognize marriage to be legal contract  Those that recognize require individuals to abide by contractual agreements in establishing relationship  Also may have to abide by dissolution requirements
  • 30.  Requires legal grounds  No-fault  No assumption of fault by either party  Fault  Adultery  Cruelty  Desertion  Insanity  Alcoholism
  • 31.  Legal declaration that not all requirements were met  Marriage never existed  Lack of legal consent  Impotence  Concealing a sexually transmitted disease  Concealing pregnancy from union with another person
  • 32.  Dissolution requires determining who gets what out of partnership  Statutes vary by state  Two dominant types of split  Dual property  All property
  • 33.  Custody  Based on custodial status of parents  Child support  Based on custodial status as well as income, costs of child rearing, and other factors  Many states have complex formulas
  • 34.  Branch of law involving governmental administrative agencies  Agencies make, enforce, and adjudicate administrative law  Investigates complaints, conducts on-site inspections, and requires annual reports  Combine government roles  Have huge impact on lives
  • 35.  Article 1, section 8 of U.S. Constitution  Grants Congress plenary power to regulate commerce  Prior to twentieth century  During twentieth century
  • 36.  Explosive growth in administrative/regulatory agencies since 1789  Interstate commerce Commission (ICC)  Created in 1887  Designed to respond to unfair railroad tariffs  Agencies grew rapidly under President F. D. Roosevelt in 1930s  Passing of Administrative Procedure Act (APA) of 1946  170 federal agencies today
  • 37.  Law created by agencies themselves  Similar to other laws in processes and procedures  Apply only to businesses and activities that fall under specific area of responsibility of agency  Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)  Has power to regulate activities related to stock exchange and securities market
  • 38.  Create their own rules due to realization by Congress that only they have specific knowledge pertaining to subject matter  Investigate violations of agency rules and devise ways to enforce them  Settle most disputes informally by voluntary settlements  Can be settled in administrative court hearings  Chevron deference
  • 39.  Increase in concern since 1960s  Overseen by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)  Is an ideal that is difficult to obtain  First Earth Day in 1970  Environmental laws existed before 1960  Most effective passed after 1960s  National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) (1969)  Clean Air Act (1970)  Clean Water Act (1972)
  • 40.  Local police and prosecutors not trained to enforce environmental laws, nor view them as priority  EPA  Largest regulatory agency  Divides enforcement tasks into three areas  Civil enforcement  Cleanup enforcement  Criminal enforcement  Most regulations (both federal and state) allow for both civil and criminal enforcement  Agencies tend to pursue civil over criminal
  • 41.  Burns and Lynch (2004)  Support for environmental protection has waxed and waned across presidential administrations since 1970  Nixon administration  Created EPA  Largely positive influence on environment  Carter administration  Provided mixed messages
  • 42.  Reagan administration  Pro-business/antiregulatory stance damaged EPA  George H. Bush administration  Mixed record much like Carter  G. W. Bush administration  Seen as worst on environmental issues  Obama administration  Entered office with “greenest” credentials  Has backtracked on many since entrance  Did kill Keystone XL pipeline
  • 43.  Primarily offenses committed by businesses  Many have far reaching health and safety effects  Defendants typically tried under principles of strict liability  Civil or criminal courts  Rylands v. Fletcher (1868)  United States v. Weitzenhoff (1994)  BP oil blowout in 2010
  • 44.  Agencies lack criminal enforcement powers beyond assessing fines  Can refer to criminal prosecution  White-collar crimes absent from tally in Uniform Crime Reports (UCR)  Financial Crimes Report  Provides separate account of white-collar crimes each year
  • 45.  Few corporate crooks recipients of truly meaningful sanctions in past  Things beginning to change  Passing of Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOA) of 2002  Requires company chiefs to personally vouch for company’s financial disclosures  White Collar Crimes Penalty Enhancement Act  Created new securities offenses with slightly enhanced penalties