Presentation about the real trade-offs when implementing a peacebuilding or international development projects. These are with a focus on the Do No Harm Approach
Tradeoffs In International Development and Peacebuilding
1. TRADE-OFFS IN AID AND
DEVELOPMENT WORK
Darnifawan, Pamelula Akun, Jerome Kanyog, Monica
Curca
“We only came here because of you (Betty Bigombe)
if this were a meeting with the NGO’s we wouldn’t have come,
the past they have taken advantage of us and this upsets us very much”
- IDP in Northern Uganda
Final presentation
May 7th
2010
2. Trade-Offs: the inevitables
The Myth of Neutrality – Monica Curca
Peace/Justice Dichotomies – Jerome Kanyog
Buying Buy-in and other peccadillos in NGO work –
Pamela Akun
The Dark Side of Microfinance – Darnifawan
4. The Myth of Neutrality: What and Why
recent proliferation and type of conflict
belligerents involved in humanitarianism
increased civil-military relations and blurring of lines
increased funding from government sources
(Andrew Natsios speech at Inter-Action)
11. The Dark Side of Microfinance -
DNH
DNH:
Connectors:
the need of fund to empower the poor
needs of peaceful circumstance to run economy
Dividers:
Conflict of interest among parties
Lacking of peace and instabilities
Government
Peace Activist
Suggestions for doing Harm in order to reach
DNH
12. Trade-offs: the inevitables
DO NO HARM
Monitor: is intervention causing more harm
Take Responsibility: sensitivity to culture and
context
Take Action: behavior change
Editor's Notes
intended purpose of NGO work is so important it justifies the ignorance to the secondary effects of NGO actions Monitor negative effects (consequences of intervention) If negative impacts outweigh the positive than NGO withdraws and returns when conditions become more conducive for effective invention. Since neutrality in fact, perception and means is close to impossible it is best to monitor and take responsibility for unintended consequences of NGO’s actions