SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 21
Download to read offline
Designation: D4762 − 11a
Standard Guide for
Testing Polymer Matrix Composite Materials1
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D4762; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope
1.1 This guide summarizes the application of ASTM stan-
dard test methods (and other supporting standards) to
continuous-fiber reinforced polymer matrix composite materi-
als. The most commonly used or most applicable ASTM
standards are included, emphasizing use of standards of Com-
mittee D30 on Composite Materials.
1.2 This guide does not cover all possible standards that
could apply to polymer matrix composites and restricts discus-
sion to the documented scope. Commonly used but non-
standard industry extensions of test method scopes, such as
application of static test methods to fatigue testing, are not
discussed. A more complete summary of general composite
testing standards, including non-ASTM test methods, is in-
cluded in the Composite Materials Handbook (MIL-HDBK-
17).2
Additional specific recommendations for testing textile
(fabric, braided) composites are contained in Guide D6856.
1.3 This guide does not specify a system of measurement;
the systems specified within each of the referenced standards
shall apply as appropriate. Note that the referenced standards
of ASTM Committee D30 are either SI-only or combined-unit
standards with SI units listed first.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:3
2.1.1 Standards of Committee D30 on Composite Materials
C271/C271M Test Method for Density of Sandwich Core
Materials
C272 Test Method for Water Absorption of Core Materials
for Structural Sandwich Constructions
C273/C273M Test Method for Shear Properties of Sandwich
Core Materials
C297/C297M Test Method for Flatwise Tensile Strength of
Sandwich Constructions
C363/C363M Test Method for Node Tensile Strength of
Honeycomb Core Materials
C364/C364M Test Method for Edgewise Compressive
Strength of Sandwich Constructions
C365/C365M Test Method for Flatwise Compressive Prop-
erties of Sandwich Cores
C366/C366M Test Methods for Measurement of Thickness
of Sandwich Cores
C393/C393M Test Method for Core Shear Properties of
Sandwich Constructions by Beam Flexure
C394 Test Method for Shear Fatigue of Sandwich Core
Materials
C480/C480M Test Method for Flexure Creep of Sandwich
Constructions
C481 Test Method for Laboratory Aging of Sandwich Con-
structions
C613/C613M Test Method for Constituent Content of Com-
posite Prepreg by Soxhlet Extraction
D2344/D2344M Test Method for Short-Beam Strength of
Polymer Matrix Composite Materials and Their Laminates
D3039/D3039M Test Method for Tensile Properties of Poly-
mer Matrix Composite Materials
D3171 Test Methods for Constituent Content of Composite
Materials
D3410/D3410M Test Method for Compressive Properties of
Polymer Matrix Composite Materials with Unsupported
Gage Section by Shear Loading
D3479/D3479M Test Method for Tension-Tension Fatigue
of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials
D3518/D3518M Test Method for In-Plane Shear Response
of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials by Tensile Test of
a 645° Laminate
D3529/D3529M Test Method for Matrix Solids Content and
Matrix Content of Composite Prepreg
D3530/D3530M Test Method for Volatiles Content of Com-
posite Material Prepreg
1
This guide is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D30 on Composite
Materials and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D30.01 on Editorial and
Resource Standards.
Current edition approved Aug. 1, 2011. Published September 2011. Originally
approved in 1988. Last previous edition approved in 2011 as D4762 – 11. DOI:
10.1520/D4762-11A.
2
Available from Standardization Documents Order Desk, DODSSP, Bldg. 4,
Section D, 700 Robbins Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19111-5098, http://
dodssp.daps.dla.mil.
3
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
the ASTM website.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
1
D3531 Test Method for Resin Flow of Carbon Fiber-Epoxy
Prepreg
D3532 Test Method for Gel Time of Carbon Fiber-Epoxy
Prepreg
D3800 Test Method for Density of High-Modulus Fibers
D3878 Terminology for Composite Materials
D4018 Test Methods for Properties of Continuous Filament
Carbon and Graphite Fiber Tows
D4102 Test Method for Thermal Oxidative Resistance of
Carbon Fibers
D4255/D4255M Test Method for In-Plane Shear Properties
of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials by the Rail Shear
Method
D5229/D5229M Test Method for Moisture Absorption Prop-
erties and Equilibrium Conditioning of Polymer Matrix
Composite Materials
D5379/D5379M Test Method for Shear Properties of Com-
posite Materials by the V-Notched Beam Method
D5448/D5448M Test Method for Inplane Shear Properties
of Hoop Wound Polymer Matrix Composite Cylinders
D5449/D5449M Test Method for Transverse Compressive
Properties of Hoop Wound Polymer Matrix Composite
Cylinders
D5450/D5450M Test Method for Transverse Tensile Prop-
erties of Hoop Wound Polymer Matrix Composite Cylin-
ders
D5467/D5467M Test Method for Compressive Properties of
Unidirectional Polymer Matrix Composite Materials Us-
ing a Sandwich Beam
D5528 Test Method for Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Tough-
ness of Unidirectional Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix
Composites
D5687/D5687M Guide for Preparation of Flat Composite
Panels with Processing Guidelines for Specimen Prepara-
tion
D5766/D5766M Test Method for Open-Hole Tensile
Strength of Polymer Matrix Composite Laminates
D5961/D5961M Test Method for Bearing Response of Poly-
mer Matrix Composite Laminates
D6115 Test Method for Mode I Fatigue Delamination
Growth Onset of Unidirectional Fiber-Reinforced Poly-
mer Matrix Composites
D6264/D6264M Test Method for Measuring the Damage
Resistance of a Fiber-Reinforced Polymer-Matrix Com-
posite to a Concentrated Quasi-Static Indentation Force
D6415/D6415M Test Method for Measuring the Curved
Beam Strength of a Fiber-Reinforced Polymer-Matrix
Composite
D6416/D6416M Test Method for Two-Dimensional Flexural
Properties of Simply Supported Sandwich Composite
Plates Subjected to a Distributed Load
D6484/D6484M Test Method for Open-Hole Compressive
Strength of Polymer Matrix Composite Laminates
D6507 Practice for Fiber Reinforcement Orientation Codes
for Composite Materials
D6641/D6641M Test Method for Compressive Properties of
Polymer Matrix Composite Materials Using a Combined
Loading Compression (CLC) Test Fixture
D6671/D6671M Test Method for Mixed Mode I-Mode II
Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber
Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites
D6742/D6742M Practice for Filled-Hole Tension and Com-
pression Testing of Polymer Matrix Composite Laminates
D6772 Test Method for Dimensional Stability of Sandwich
Core Materials
D6790 Test Method for Determining Poisson’s Ratio of
Honeycomb Cores
D6856 Guide for Testing Fabric-Reinforced “Textile” Com-
posite Materials
D6873/D6873M Practice for Bearing Fatigue Response of
Polymer Matrix Composite Laminates
D7028 Test Method for Glass Transition Temperature (DMA
Tg) of Polymer Matrix Composites by Dynamic Mechani-
cal Analysis (DMA)
D7078/D7078M Test Method for Shear Properties of Com-
posite Materials by V-Notched Rail Shear Method
D7136/D7136M Test Method for Measuring the Damage
Resistance of a Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Com-
posite to a Drop-Weight Impact Event
D7137/D7137M Test Method for Compressive Residual
Strength Properties of Damaged Polymer Matrix Compos-
ite Plates
D7205/D7205M Test Method for Tensile Properties of Fiber
Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite Bars
D7248/D7248M Test Method for Bearing/Bypass Interac-
tion Response of Polymer Matrix Composite Laminates
Using 2-Fastener Specimens
D7249/D7249M Test Method for Facing Properties of Sand-
wich Constructions by Long Beam Flexure
D7250/D7250M Practice for Determining Sandwich Beam
Flexural and Shear Stiffness
D7264/D7264M Test Method for Flexural Properties of
Polymer Matrix Composite Materials
D7291/D7291M Test Method for Through-Thickness “Flat-
wise” Tensile Strength and Elastic Modulus of a Fiber-
Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite Material
D7332/D7332M Test Method for Measuring the Fastener
Pull-Through Resistance of a Fiber-Reinforced Polymer
Matrix Composite
D7336/D7336M Test Method for Static Energy Absorption
Properties of Honeycomb Sandwich Core Materials
D7337/D7337M Test Method for Tensile Creep Rupture of
Fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite Bars
D7522/D7522M Test Method for Pull-Off Strength for FRP
Laminate Systems Bonded to Concrete Substrate
D7565/D7565M Test Method for Determining Tensile Prop-
erties of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites
Used for Strengthening of Civil Structures
D7615/D7615M Practice for Open-Hole Fatigue Response
of Polymer Matrix Composite Laminates
D7616/D7616M Test Method for Determining Apparent
Overlap Splice Shear Strength Properties of Wet Lay-Up
Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites Used for
Strengthening Civil Structures
D7617/D7617M Test Method for Transverse Shear Strength
of Fiber-reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite Bars
D4762 − 11a
2
E1309 Guide for Identification of Fiber-Reinforced
Polymer-Matrix Composite Materials in Databases
E1434 Guide for Recording Mechanical Test Data of Fiber-
Reinforced Composite Materials in Databases
E1471 Guide for Identification of Fibers, Fillers, and Core
Materials in Computerized Material Property Databases
F1645/F1645M Test Method for Water Migration in Honey-
comb Core Materials
2.1.2 Standards of Committee D20 on Plastics
C581 Practice for Determining Chemical Resistance of
Thermosetting Resins Used in Glass-Fiber-Reinforced
Structures Intended for Liquid Service
D256 Test Methods for Determining the Izod Pendulum
Impact Resistance of Plastics
D543 Practices for Evaluating the Resistance of Plastics to
Chemical Reagents
D570 Test Method for Water Absorption of Plastics
D618 Practice for Conditioning Plastics for Testing
D638 Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics
D648 Test Method for Deflection Temperature of Plastics
Under Flexural Load in the Edgewise Position
D671 Test Method for Flexural Fatigue of Plastics by
Constant-Amplitude-of-Force (Withdrawn 2002)4
D695 Test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid
Plastics
D696 Test Method for Coefficient of Linear Thermal Expan-
sion of Plastics Between −30°C and 30°C with a Vitreous
Silica Dilatometer
D790 Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced
and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materi-
als
D792 Test Methods for Density and Specific Gravity (Rela-
tive Density) of Plastics by Displacement
D953 Test Method for Bearing Strength of Plastics
D1505 Test Method for Density of Plastics by the Density-
Gradient Technique
D1822 Test Method for Tensile-Impact Energy to Break
Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials
D2471 Practice for Gel Time and Peak Exothermic Tempera-
ture of Reacting Thermosetting Resins (Withdrawn 2008)4
D2583 Test Method for Indentation Hardness of Rigid Plas-
tics by Means of a Barcol Impressor
D2584 Test Method for Ignition Loss of Cured Reinforced
Resins
D2734 Test Methods for Void Content of Reinforced Plastics
D2990 Test Methods for Tensile, Compressive, and Flexural
Creep and Creep-Rupture of Plastics
D3418 Test Method for Transition Temperatures and En-
thalpies of Fusion and Crystallization of Polymers by
Differential Scanning Calorimetry
D3846 Test Method for In-Plane Shear Strength of Rein-
forced Plastics
D4065 Practice for Plastics: Dynamic Mechanical Proper-
ties: Determination and Report of Procedures
D4473 Test Method for Plastics: Dynamic Mechanical Prop-
erties: Cure Behavior
D5083 Test Method for Tensile Properties of Reinforced
Thermosetting Plastics Using Straight-Sided Specimens
D6272 Test Method for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced
and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materi-
als by Four-Point Bending
2.1.3 Standards of Other ASTM Committees
E228 Test Method for Linear Thermal Expansion of Solid
Materials With a Push-Rod Dilatometer
E289 Test Method for Linear Thermal Expansion of Rigid
Solids with Interferometry
E1269 Test Method for Determining Specific Heat Capacity
by Differential Scanning Calorimetry
E1461 Test Method for Thermal Diffusivity by the Flash
Method
E1922 Test Method for Translaminar Fracture Toughness of
Laminated and Pultruded Polymer Matrix Composite
Materials
3. Terminology
3.1 Definitions related to composite materials are defined in
Terminology D3878.
3.2 Symbology for specifying the orientation and stacking
sequence of a composite laminate is defined in Practice D6507.
3.3 For purposes of this document, “low modulus” compos-
ites are defined as being reinforced with fibers having a
modulus ≤20 GPa (≤3.0 × 106
psi), while “high-modulus”
composites are reinforced with fiber having a modulus >20
GPa (>3.0 × 106
psi).
4. Significance and Use
4.1 This guide is intended to aid in the selection of standards
for polymer matrix composite materials. It specifically sum-
marizes the application of standards from ASTM Committee
D30 on Composite Materials that apply to continuous-fiber
reinforced polymer matrix composite materials. For reference
and comparison, many commonly used or applicable ASTM
standards from other ASTM Committees are also included.
5. Standard Specimen Preparation
5.1 Preparation of polymer matrix composite test specimens
is described in Guide D5687/D5687M.
6. Standard Test Methods
6.1 ASTM test methods for the evaluation of polymer
matrix composites are summarized in the tables. Advantages,
disadvantages, and other comments for each test method are
included where appropriate. Where possible, a single preferred
test method is identified.
TEST METHOD CATEGORY TABLE
Lamina/Laminate Static Properties Table 1
Lamina/Laminate Dynamic Properties Table 2
Laminate/Structural Response Table 3
Sandwich Constructions Table 4
Constituent/Precursor/Thermophysical Properties Table 5
Environmental Conditioning/Resistance Table 6
4
The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced on
www.astm.org.
D4762 − 11a
3
TABLE 1 Lamina/Laminate Static Test Methods
Test Method Specimen Measured Property
Description and
Advantages
Disadvantages Comments
In-Plane Tensile Test Methods
D3039/D3039M Tensile Strength Straight sided speci-
men. Suitable for both
random, discontinuous
and continuous-fiber
composites. Tabbed
and untabbed configu-
rations available.
Tabbed configurations
require careful adhe-
sive selection and
special specimen
preparation.
Certain laminate
layups prone to edge
delamination which
can affect tensile
strength results.
Preferred for most uses.
Provides additional
configurations, requirements,
and guidance that are not found
in D5083.
Limited to laminates that are
balanced and symmetric with
respect to the test direction.
Tensile Modulus,
Poisson’s Ratio,
Stress-Strain Re-
sponse
Requires use of strain
or displacement trans-
ducers.
Modulus measure-
ments do not require
use of tabs.
Modulus measurements typi-
cally robust.
D638 Tensile Strength,
Tensile Modulus
“Dumbbell” shaped
specimen.
Ease of test specimen
preparation.
Stress concentration
at the radii.
Unsuitable for highly
oriented fiber com-
posites.
Not recommended for high-
modulus composites.
Technically equivalent to ISO
527-1.
D5083 Tensile Strength,
Tensile Modulus
Straight-sided, unt-
abbed specimen only.
Suitable for plastics
and low-modulus
composites.
A straight-sided alternative to
D638.
Technically equivalent to ISO
527-4 except as noted below:
(a) This test method does not
include testing of the Type I
dog-bone shaped specimen
described in ISO 527-4. Testing
of this type of specimen, pri-
marily used for reinforced and
unreinforced thermoplastic
materials, is described in D638.
(b) The thickness of test speci-
mens in this test method in-
cludes the 2 mm to 10 mm
thickness range of ISO 527-4,
but expands the allowable test
thickness to 14 mm.
D5450/D5450M Transverse (90°) Ten-
sile Strength
Hoop wound cylinder
with all 90° (hoop)
plies loaded in axial
tension.
Develops data for
specialized process/
form.
Limited to hoop-
wound cylinders.
Limited to transverse
tensile properties.
Must bond specimen
to fixture.
Must ensure adequate bonding
to fixture.
In-Plane Compression Test Methods
D6641/D6641M Compressive Strength Untabbed, or tabbed
straight-sided speci-
men loaded via a
combination of shear
and end-loading.
Smaller lighter, less
expensive fixture than
that of D3410/
D3410M.
Better also at non-
ambient environments.
Suitable for continu-
ous fiber composites.
Tabbed specimens
are required for deter-
mining compressive
strength of laminates
containing more than
50% 0° plies.
Preferred method.
Thickness must be sufficient to
prevent column buckling.
Limited to laminates that are
balanced and symmetric and
contain at least one 0° ply.
For strength determination, unt-
abbed specimens are limited to
a maximum of 50 % 0° plies, or
equivalent.
Compressive
Modulus, Poisson’s
Ratio,
Stress-Strain Re-
sponse
Requires use of strain
or displacement trans-
ducers.
Unidirectional tape or tow com-
posites can be tested using unt-
abbed specimens to determine
unidirectional modulus and
Poisson’s ratio.
D4762 − 11a
4
TABLE 1 Continued
Test Method Specimen Measured Property
Description and
Advantages
Disadvantages Comments
D695 Compressive
Strength,
Compressive Modulus
“Dogbone” shaped
specimen with loading
applied at the ends
via a platen.
Tabs are optional.
Failure mode is often
end-crushing.
Stress concentrations
at radii. Specimen
must be dog boned
and ends must be
accurately machined.
No assessment of
alignment.
Not recommended for highly
oriented or continuous fiber
composites.
Modified version of D695 re-
leased as SACMA SRM 1 test
method is widely used in aero-
space industry, but ASTM D30
and MIL-HDBK-17 prefer use of
D6641/D6641M method.
D3410/D3410M Compressive Strength Straight sided speci-
men with load applied
by shear via fixture
grips.
Suitable for random,
discontinuous and
continuous fiber com-
posites.
Tabbed and untabbed
configurations avail-
able.
Strain gages required
to verify alignment.
Poor for non-ambient
testing due to mas-
sive fixture.
Expensive and heavy/bulky fix-
turing.
Thickness must be sufficient to
prevent column buckling.
Compressive
Modulus, Poisson’s
Ratio,
Stress-Strain Re-
sponse
Requires use of strain
or displacement trans-
ducers.
D5467/D5467M Compressive
Strength,
Compressive
Modulus, Stress-
Strain Response
Sandwich beam speci-
men loaded in 4-point
bending.
Intended result is a
compression failure
mode of the
facesheet.
Data is especially ap-
plicable to sandwich
structures.
Fixturing is simple
compared to other
compression tests.
An expensive speci-
men that is not rec-
ommended unless
the structure warrants
its use.
Strain gages required
to obtain modulus
and strain-to-failure
data.
Narrow (1 in. wide)
specimen may not be
suitable for materials
with coarse features,
such as fabrics with
large filament count
tows (12K or more) or
certain braided mate-
rials.
Must take care to avoid core
failure modes.
Limited to high-modulus com-
posites.
Due to the nature of the speci-
men construction and applied
flexural loading these results
may not be equivalent to a
similar laminate tested by other
compression methods such as
D3410/D3410M or D6641/
D6641M.
D5449/D5449M Transverse (90°)
Compressive Strength
Hoop-wound cylinder
with all 90° (hoop)
plies loaded in com-
pression.
Develops data for
specialized process/
form.
Limited to hoop-
wound cylinders.
Limited to transverse
compressive proper-
ties.
Must bond specimen
to fixture.
Must ensure adequate bonding
to fixture.
In-Plane Shear Test Methods
D3518/D3518M Shear Modulus,
Stress-Strain
Response,
Maximum Shear
Stress
Tensile test of
[+45/-45]ns layup.
Simple test specimen
and test method.
Poor specimen for
measuring ultimate
shear strength due to
large non-linear re-
sponse.
Limited to material
forms/processes that
can be made in flat
±45° form.
Biaxial transducers
required to obtain
modulus and strain-
to-failure data.
Maximum shear
stress determination
is dependent upon
instrumentation-based
strain measurements
at high shear strain
magnitudes.
Widely used due to its low cost
and simplicity.
Specimen gage section is not
under pure shear stress,
and stress fields local to free
edges are complex.
D4762 − 11a
5
TABLE 1 Continued
Test Method Specimen Measured Property
Description and
Advantages
Disadvantages Comments
D5379/D5379M Shear Strength,
Shear Modulus,
Stress-Strain Re-
sponse
V-notched specimen
loaded in special
bending fixture.
Along with D7078/
D7078M, provides the
best shear response
of the standardized
methods.
Provides shear modu-
lus and strength.
Can be used to test
most composite types.
Produces a relatively
pure and uniform
shear stress state.
May be necessary to
tab the specimen.
Specimen can be dif-
ficult to machine.
Biaxial strain gages
required to obtain
modulus and strain-
to-failure data.
Requires good strain-
gage installation tech-
nique.
In-plane tests not
suitable for materials
with coarse features,
such as fabrics with
large filament count
tows (12K or more) or
certain braided mate-
rials.
Unacceptable failure
modes, especially
with high-strength
laminates, can occur
due to localized fail-
ure of the specimen
at the loading points.
Recommended for quantitative
data, or where shear modulus
or stress/strain data are re-
quired. Enables correlation with
out-of-plane properties.
Must monitor strain data for
specimen buckling.
Limited to the following forms:
(a ) unidirectional tape or tow
laminates with fibers parallel or
perpendicular to loading axis.
(b) woven fabric laminates with
the warp direction parallel or
perpendicular to loading axis.
(c) laminates with equal num-
bers of 0° and 90° plies with
the 0° plies parallel or perpen-
dicular to loading axis.
(d) short-fiber composites with
majority of the fibers randomly
distributed.
The most accurate modulus
measurements obtained from
laminates of the [0/90] family.
D4255/D4255M Shear Strength,
Shear Modulus,
Stress-Strain Re-
sponse
Rail shear methods.
Suitable for both ran-
dom and continuous
fiber composites.
Difficult test to run.
Historically has had
poor reproducibility.
Stress concentrations
at gripping areas.
Strain gages required
to obtain modulus
and strain-to-failure
data.
Expensive specimen.
Best reserved for testing of
laminates.
D5448/D5448M Shear Strength,
Shear Modulus,
Stress-Strain Re-
sponse
Hoop-wound cylinder
with all 90° (hoop)
plies loaded in torsion.
Develops data for
specialized process/
form.
Limited to hoop-
wound cylinders.
Limited to in-plane
shear properties.
Must bond specimen
to fixture.
Must ensure adequate bonding
to fixture.
D7078/D7078M Shear Strength,
Shear Modulus,
Stress-Strain Re-
sponse
V-notched specimen
loaded in rail shear
fixture.
Along with D5379/
D5379M, provides the
best shear response
of the standardized
methods.
Provides shear modu-
lus and strength.
Can be used to test
most composite types.
Produces a relatively
pure and uniform
shear stress state.
Generally does not
require tabs.
Permits testing of fab-
ric and textile compos-
ites with large unit
cells.
Less susceptible to
loading point failures
than D5379/D5379M.
Specimen can be dif-
ficult to machine.
Biaxial strain gages
required to obtain
modulus and strain-
to-failure data.
Requires good strain-
gage installation tech-
nique.
Recommended for quantitative
data, or where shear modulus
or stress/strain data are re-
quired.
Enables correlation with out-of-
plane properties.
Must monitor strain data for
specimen buckling.
Material form limitations are
equivalent to those for D5379/
D5379M. The most accurate
modulus measurements ob-
tained from laminates of the
[0/90} family.
Out-of-Plane Tensile Test Methods
D4762 − 11a
6
TABLE 1 Continued
Test Method Specimen Measured Property
Description and
Advantages
Disadvantages Comments
D6415/D6415M Curved Laminate
Strength
Right-angle curved
laminate specimen
loaded in 4-point
bending.
Suitable for continu-
ous fiber composites.
A complex stress
state is generated in
the specimen that
may cause an unin-
tended complex fail-
ure mode.
There is typically a
large amount of scat-
ter in the curved
beam strength data.
While the failure
mode is largely out-
of-plane, the result is
generally considered
a structural test of a
curved beam rather
than a material prop-
erty.
Limited to composites with de-
fined layers (no through-the-
thickness reinforcement).
For structural comparison, the
same manufacturing process
should be used for both the test
specimen and the structure.
Non-standard versions of the
curved-beam test yield a differ-
ent stress state that may affect
the strength and failure mode.
Interlaminar Tensile
Strength
See above. See above. Tests for interlaminar tensile
strength limited to unidirectional
materials with fibers oriented
continuously along the legs and
around the bend.
D7291/D7291M Flatwise Tensile
Strength, Flatwise
Modulus
Cylindrical or reduced
gage section “spool”
specimen loaded in
tension.
Uses adhesively
bonded thick metal
end-tabs for load in-
troduction.
Suitable for continu-
ous or discontinuous
fiber composites.
Subjects a relatively
large volume of mate-
rial to an almost uni-
form stress field.
Results are sensitive
to system alignment
and load eccentricity.
Surface finish and
parallelism affect
strength results.
Results are sensitive
to thermal residual
stresses, adhesive,
and surface prepara-
tion at end-tab bond-
lines.
Requires bonding and machin-
ing of laminate and end-tabs.
End-tabs may be reused within
geometric limits.
Low crosshead displacement
rate (0.1 mm/mim [0.005 in.
/min].
Valid tests require failures away
from the end-tab bondline.
Out-of-Plane Shear Test Methods
D2344/D2344M Short Beam Strength Short rectangular
beam specimen
loaded in 3-point
bending.
Short Beam Strength
is a good indicator of
resin-dominated prop-
erties.
Simple, inexpensive
specimen and test
configuration.
Short Beam Strength
may be related to in-
terlaminar shear
strength, but the
stress state is quite
mixed, and so results
are not recommended
as an assessment of
shear strength due to
stress concentrations
and high secondary
stresses at loading
points.
Shear modulus can-
not be measured.
Intended primarily for quality
control, comparative data, and
assessment of environmental
effects.
D5379/D5379M Interlaminar Shear
Strength,
Interlaminar Shear
Modulus
V-notched specimen
loaded in special
bending fixture.
Along with D7078/
D7078M, provides the
best shear response
of the standardized
methods.
Provides shear modu-
lus and strength.
Can be used to test
most composites.
Produces a relatively
pure and uniform
shear stress state.
May be necessary to
tab the specimen.
Specimen can be dif-
ficult to machine.
Strain gages required
to obtain modulus
and strain-to-failure
data.
Requires good strain-
gage installation tech-
nique.
Requires a very thick
laminate, 20 mm
(0.75 in.) for out-of-
plane properties.
Recommended for quantitative
data, or where shear modulus
or stress/strain data are re-
quired.
Enables correlation with in-
plane properties.
Must monitor strain data for
specimen buckling.
D4762 − 11a
7
7. Standard Data Reporting
7.1 Constituent Material Description—Data reporting of the
description of composite material constituents is documented
in Guide E1471.
7.2 Composite Material Description—Data reporting of the
description of composite materials is documented in Guide
E1309.
TABLE 1 Continued
Test Method Specimen Measured Property
Description and
Advantages
Disadvantages Comments
D3846 Shear Strength Specimen with two
machined notches
loaded in compres-
sion.
Suitable for randomly
dispersed and con-
tinuous fiber rein-
forced materials.
May be preferable to
D2344/D2344M for
materials with ran-
domly dispersed fiber
orientations.
Failures may be sen-
sitive to accuracy of
notch machining.
Stress concentrations
at notches.
Failure may be influ-
enced by the applied
compression stress.
Requires post-failure
measurement of
shear area. Shear
modulus cannot be
measured.
Specimen loaded in compres-
sion utilizing the D695 loading/
stabilizing jig.
Shear loading occurs in a plane
between two machined
notches. Often a problematic
test. Note that this is an out-of-
plane shear test (using recog-
nized terminology), despite the
title that indicates in-plane
shear loading.
D7078/D7078M Interlaminar Shear
Strength,
Interlaminar Shear
Modulus
V-notched specimen
loaded in rail shear
fixture. Along with
D5379/D5379M, pro-
vides the best shear
response of the stan-
dardized methods.
Provides shear modu-
lus and strength.
Can be used to test
most composites.
Produces a relatively
pure and uniform
shear stress state.
Less susceptible to
loading point failures
than D5379/D5379M.
Specimen can be dif-
ficult to machine.
Strain gages required
to obtain modulus
and strain-to-failure
data.
Requires good strain-
gage installation tech-
nique.
Requires an ex-
tremely thick
laminate, typically
consisting of multiple
co-bonded sub-
laminates, for out-of-
plane properties.
Recommended for quantitative
data, or where shear modulus
or stress/strain data are re-
quired.
Enables correlation with in-
plane properties. Must monitor
strain data for specimen buck-
ling.
Laminate Flexural Test Methods
D790 Flexural Strength,
Flexural Modulus,
Flexural Stress-Strain
Response
Flat rectangular speci-
men loaded in 3-point
bending.
Suitable for randomly
dispersed and con-
tinuous fiber rein-
forced materials.
Ease of test specimen
preparation and test-
ing.
Stress concentrations
and secondary
stresses at loading
points.
Results sensitive to
specimen and loading
geometry, strain rate.
Failure mode may be tension,
compression, shear, or combi-
nation.
D6272 Flexural Strength,
Flexural Modulus,
Flexural Stress-Strain
Response
Flat rectangular speci-
men loaded in 4-point
bending.
Suitable for randomly
dispersed and con-
tinuous fiber rein-
forced materials.
Ease of test specim
en preparation and
testing.
Choice of two proce-
dures enable adjust-
able tension/
compression/
shear load distribution.
Center-point deflec-
tion requires second-
ary instrumentation.
Results sensitive to
specimen and loading
geometry, strain rate.
Span-to-depth ratio
must increase for
laminates with high
tensile strength with
respect to in-plane
shear strength.
The quarter-span version is rec-
ommended for highmodulus
composites.
Failure mode may be tension,
compression, shear, or combi-
nation.
D4762 − 11a
8
TABLE 1 Continued
Test Method Specimen Measured Property
Description and
Advantages
Disadvantages Comments
D6416/D6416M Pressure-Deflection
Response,
Pressure-Strain
Response,
Plate Bending and
Shear Stiffness
Two-dimensional plate
flexure induced by a
well-defined distrib-
uted load.
Apparatus, instrumen-
tation ensure applied
pressure distribution is
known.
Failures typically initi-
ate away from edges.
Specimens are rela-
tively large, facilitating
study of manufactur-
ing defects and pro-
cess variables.
For studies of failure
mechanics and other
quantitative sandwich
analyses, only small
panel deflections are
allowed.
The test fixture is
necessarily more
elaborate, and some
calibration is required
to verify simply-
supported boundary
conditions.
Results highly depen-
dent upon panel edge
boundary conditions
and pressure distribu-
tion.
Relatively large speci-
men and support fix-
ture geometry.
The same caveats applying to
D7249/D7249M could apply to
D6416/D6416M.
However, this method is not
limited to sandwich composites;
D6416/D6416M can be used to
evaluate the 2-dimensional flex-
ural properties of any square
plate.
Distributed load is provided us-
ing a water-filled bladder.
Ratio of support span to aver-
age specimen thickness should
be between 10 to 30.
D7264/D7264M Flexural Strength,
Flexural Modulus,
Flexural Stress-Strain
Response
Recommended for
high-modulus compos-
ites.
Flat rectangular speci-
men loaded in 3 or
4-point bending.
Suitable for randomly
dispersed and con-
tinuous fiber rein-
forced materials.
Ease of test specimen
preparation and test-
ing.
Standardized load and
support spans to sim-
plify calculations and
to standardize geom-
etry.
Center-point deflec-
tion measurement
requires secondary
instrumentation.
Results sensitive to
specimen and loading
geometry, strain rate.
Span-to-depth ratio
may need to increase
for laminates with
high tensile strength
with respect to in-
plane shear strength.
Standard support span-to-
thickness ratio is 32:1.
For 4-point load, load points are
set at one-half of the support
span.
Failure mode may be tension,
compression, shear, or combi-
nation.
Fracture Toughness Test Methods
D5528 Mode I Interlaminar
Fracture Toughness,
GIc
Flat rectangular speci-
men with delamination
insert loaded in ten-
sion.
Suitable for unidirec-
tional tape or tow
laminates.
Relatively stable de-
lamination growth.
Specimens must be
hinged at the loading
points.
Crack growth not al-
ways well behaved.
Calculations assume linear
elastic behavior.
Crack growth should be ob-
served from both sides of the
specimen.
D6671/D6671M Mixed Mode I/II Inter-
laminar Fracture
Toughness, Gc
Flat rectangular speci-
men with delamination
insert loaded in bend-
ing.
Suitable for unidirec-
tional tape or tow
laminates.
Tests at most mode
mixtures.
Constant mode mix-
tures with crack
growth.
Can obtain initiation
and propagation
toughness values.
Specimens must be
hinged at the loading
points. Crack growth
not always well be-
haved.
Complicated loading
apparatus.
Good alignment is critical.
Calculations assume linear
elastic behavior.
E1922 Translaminar Fracture
Toughness, KTL
Flat rectangular speci-
men containing an
edge notch loaded in
tension.
Simple test to per-
form.
Results are only valid
for the particular lami-
nate tested.
Laminates producing
large damage zones
do not give valid val-
ues.
D4762 − 11a
9
7.3 Composite Material Test Data—Data reporting of me-
chanical test data results for composite materials is docu-
mented in Guide E1434.
8. Keywords
8.1 bearing strength; bearing-bypass interaction; coefficient
of thermal expansion; composite materials; composites; com-
pression; compressive strength; constituent content; crack-
growth testing; creep; creep strength; CTE; curved-beam
strength; damage; damage resistance; damage tolerance; data
recording; data records; delamination; density; drop-weight
impact; elastic modulus; fastener pull-through; fatigue; fiber;
fiber volume; filament; filled-hole compression strength; filled-
hole tensile strength; flatwise tensile strength; flexural modu-
lus; flexure; fracture; fracture toughness; gel time; glass
transition temperature; hoop-wound; impact; impact strength;
TABLE 2 Lamina/Laminate Dynamic Test Methods
Test Method Specimen Measured Property
Description and
Advantages
Disadvantages Comments
In-Plane Tension/Tension Fatigue Test Methods
D3479/D3479M Tension-Tension Stress-
Cycles (S-N) Data
Uses D3039/D3039M ten-
sile test specimen, with
axial tension-tension cy-
clic loading.
Suitable for both random
and continuous-fiber com-
posites.
Stress concentrations at
the end tabs.
End tab machining and
bonding required.
Careful specimen prepa-
ration is critical.
Appropriate specimen ge-
ometry may vary from
material to material.
User should be prepared
to do preliminary fatigue
tests to optimize tab con-
figurations and materials.
In-Plane Flexural Fatigue Test Methods
D671 Flexural Stress-Cycles
(S-N) Data
Constant-force cantilever
specimen.
Inexpensive high cycle
fatigue (HCF) method.
Stress concentrations at
notches.
Results sensitive to speci-
men thickness.
Not suitable for
continuous-fiber compos-
ites.
This test method should
not be used for
continuous-fiber compos-
ites.
Flexural tests are typically
considered structural
tests, not material prop-
erty tests.
Fatigue Crack-Growth/Toughness Test Methods
D6115 Mode I Fatigue Delamina-
tion Initiation; Toughness-
Cycles (G-N) Data
Uses D5528 DCB
specimen, with cyclic
loading.
Produces threshold fa-
tigue data
(GImax versus N).
Does not produce da/dN
data.
The limitations and com-
ments for D5528 also ap-
ply.
Tensile Creep Test Methods
D2990 Tensile Strain versus Time Uses D638 tensile
specimen, with long-
duration loading.
Ease of test specimen
preparation.
Stress concentrations at
specimen radii.
Not suitable for continu-
ous fiber composites; in-
stead use D3039/D3039M
type specimen.
Flexural Creep Test Methods
D2990 Flexural Deflection versus
Time
Uses D790 flexure
specimen, with long-
duration loading.
Includes both 3 and
4-point bending test set-
ups.
Simple to set up and run.
Continuous-fiber flexural
material response is
complex, making results
hard to interpret or gener-
alize.
Results sensitive to speci-
men and loading geom-
etry.
Failure mode may vary.
Not widely used in ad-
vanced composites indus-
try.
Tensile Impact Test Methods
D1822 Tensile Impact Energy of
Rupture
Relatively inexpensive
test machine.
Stress concentrations at
the radii.
Very small test speci-
mens.
Not instrumented.
Not suitable for continu-
ous fiber composites.
Flexural Impact Test Methods
D256 Impact Energy of Rupture Notched specimen.
Flexibility in testing meth-
ods.
Not instrumented.
Varying failure modes.
Sensitive to test specimen
geometry variations.
This test provides a struc-
tural impact property, not
a material impact
property.
D4762 − 11a
10
lamina; laminate; matrix content; mixed mode; mode I; mode
II; mode III; modulus of elasticity; moisture content; moisture
diffusivity; OHC; OHT; open-hole compressive strength; open-
hole tensile strength; out-of-plane compressive strength; out-
of-plane shear strength; out-of-plane tensile strength; panel;
plate; Poisson’s ratio; polymer matrix composites; prepreg;
reinforcement; reinforcement content; reinforcement volume;
resin; resin content; sandwich construction; shear; shear modu-
lus; shear strength; short-beam strength; specific heat; strain
energy release rate; strength; structure; tensile strength; ten-
sion; thermal conductivity; thermal diffusivity; thermal expan-
sion coefficient; tow; V-notched beam strength; void content;
winding; yarn
TABLE 3 Laminate/Structural Test Methods
Test Method Specimen Measured Property
Description and
Advantages
Disadvantages Comments
Notched Laminate Tension Test Methods
D5766/D5766M Open Hole Tensile
Strength
Straight-sided, untabbed,
open hole configuration.
Procedure nearly equiva-
lent to D3039/D3039M.
Limited to multi-directional
laminates with balanced
and symmetric stacking
sequences.
Provides require-
ments and guid-
ance on specimen
configuration and
failure modes.
D6742/D6742M Filled Hole Tensile
Strength
Straight-sided, untabbed,
filled hole configuration.
Procedure and specimen
nearly equivalent to
D3039/D3039M, D5766/
D5766M.
Same as D5766/D5766M. Same as D5766/
D5766M.
Also provides guid-
ance on hole
tolerances, fastener
torque/preload.
Notched Laminate Compression Test Methods
D6484/D6484M Open Hole Compressive
Strength
Straight-sided, untabbed,
open hole configuration.
Fixture can be loaded us-
ing either hydraulic grips
or end platens.
Limited to multi-directional
laminates with balanced
and symmetric stacking
sequences.
Provides require-
ments and guid-
ance on specimen
configuration and
failure modes.
D6742/D6742M Filled Hole Compressive
Strength
Straight-sided, untabbed,
filled hole configuration.
Procedure, specimen and
apparatus nearly equiva-
lent to D6484/D6484M.
Same as D6484/D6484M. Same as D6484/
D6484M.
Also provides guid-
ance on hole
tolerances, fastener
torque/preload.
Notched Laminate Fatigue Test Methods
D7615/D7615M Open Hole Stress-
Cycles (S-N) Data
Specimen and apparatus
equivalent to D5766/
D5766M Configuration A
for tension-tension fatigue
loading and to D6484/
D6484M Procedure A for
tension-compression and
compression-compression
fatigue loading.
Same as D5766/D5766M
and D6484/D6484M.
Specimen stiffness moni-
tored using an
extensometer, which must
be removed during fatigue
cycling.
Same as D5766/
D5766M and
D6484/D6484M.
Also provides guid-
ance on fatigue
loading ratio effects
Bolted Joint Test Methods
D953 Static Pin Bearing
Strength
One fastener, double
shear pin bearing speci-
men.
Two methods available:
tensile and compressive
pin bearing.
Monitors global load ver-
sus deformation behavior.
Focus is plastics.
Does not account for vari-
ous fastener geometries,
torque/preload levels.
Deformation local to hole
is not measured.
Some specimen
geometric proper-
ties (for example,
width/diameter ra-
tio) vary from
D5961/D5961M
guidelines.
Not recommended
for continuous fiber
composites.
D5961/D5961M Static Bearing Strength One and two fastener
double and single shear
bearing specimens loaded
in tension or compression.
Multiple specimen con-
figurations provided to
assess a variety of struc-
tural joint configurations.
Procedures provided to
monitor inelastic deforma-
tion behavior at hole.
Limited to multi-directional
laminates with balanced
and symmetric stacking
sequences. Response
highly dependent upon
specimen configuration
and fastener torque/
preload.
Limited to bearing failure
modes only. Some details
of specimen configura-
tions are not suitable for
determining bypass failure
strengths.
Provides require-
ments and guid-
ance on specimen
configuration, type
of loading, hole
tolerances, fastener
torque/preload and
failure modes.
D4762 − 11a
11
TABLE 3 Continued
Test Method Specimen Measured Property
Description and
Advantages
Disadvantages Comments
D6873/D6873M Bearing Stress-Cycles
(S-N) Data
Specimen and apparatus
equivalent to D5961/
D5961M, with cyclic load-
ing procedures provided
to monitor hole elongation
for a variety of joint con-
figurations and fatigue
loading conditions.
Same as D5961/D5961M.
Certain tests may require
fastener removal or a
variant quasi-static load-
ing ratio to monitor hole
elongation.
Same as D5961/
D5961M. Also pro-
vides guidance on
fatigue loading ratio
effects. Currently
limited to D5961/
D5961M Procedure
A and B specimen
configurations.
D7248/D7248M Bearing-Bypass Interac-
tion
One and two fastener
double and single shear
specimens loaded in ten-
sion or compression.
Multiple specimen con-
figurations provided to
assess a variety of joint
configurations and fas-
tener force proportions,
optimized to promote
bypass-dominated failure
modes.
Limited to multidirectional
laminates with balanced
and symmetric stacking
sequences.
Response highly depen-
dent upon specimen con-
figuration and fastener
torque/preload.
Limited to bypass failure
modes only.
Procedure C requires
doubler plate calibration
to extract fastener force
proportion values.
Provides require-
ments and guid-
ance on specimen
configuration, type
of loading, hole
tolerances, fastener
torque/preload, fail-
ure modes, and
fastener force pro-
portion measure-
ment.
D7332/D7332M Fastener Pull-Through
Resistance
Two specimen
configurations, Procedure
A (compression-loaded
fixture) for fastener
screening, Procedure B
(tension-loaded fixture) for
composite joint configura-
tion assessments.
Limited to multidirectional
laminates with balanced
and symmetric stacking
sequences. Response
highly dependent upon
specimen configuration
and fastener characteris-
tics.
Provides require-
ments and guid-
ance on specimen
configuration, hole
tolerances, fastener
characteristics, fail-
ure modes, and
force-displacement
response character-
ization.
Static Indentation and Impact Damage Resistance Test Methods
D2583 Indentation Hardness Provides a relative mea-
sure of hardness based
upon load versus indenta-
tion depth response.
Barcol impressor is
portable, and load is ap-
plied by hand.
Focus is plastics and low-
modulus composites.
Does not record force ver-
sus indentation depth re-
sponse.
Does not evaluate result-
ing damage state.
Uses flat-tipped
indenter.
D6264/D6264M Static Indentation Dam-
age Resistance (Force-
Indenter Displacement
Response,
Dent Depth,
Damage Characteristics)
Flat rectangular laminated
plate subject to a static
point loading.
Permits damage resis-
tance testing of simply-
supported and rigidly
backed plate specimens.
Uses a conventional test-
ing machine.
Contact force and in-
denter displacement data
are obtained.
Limited to continuous fiber
composites without
through-the-thickness re-
inforcement.
Test method does not ad-
dress dynamic indentation
effects.
Narrow range of permis-
sible specimen thick-
nesses.
Uses 12.7 mm
(0.50 in.) diameter
hemispherical in-
denter.
Often used to ap-
proximate the dam-
age state caused
by a dynamic im-
pact.
Multi-directional
fiber laminates with
balanced and sym-
metric stacking se-
quences are usu-
ally used.
The damage re-
sponse is a func-
tion of the indentor
geometry, support
conditions and
specimen configu-
ration.
D4762 − 11a
12
TABLE 3 Continued
Test Method Specimen Measured Property
Description and
Advantages
Disadvantages Comments
D7136/D7136M Drop-Weight Impact Dam-
age Resistance
(Indenter Contact Force
and Velocity versus Time,
Dent Depth, Damage
Characteristics)
Flat rectangular laminated
plate subject to a dynamic
dropweight point loading.
Permits damage resis-
tance testing of simply-
supported plate speci-
mens.
Uses a dedicated drop-
weight device, preferably
with velocity detection
equipment.
Limited to continuous fiber
composites without
through-the-thickness re-
inforcement.
Results are very sensitive
to impactor mass,
diameter, drop height, and
other parameters.
Narrow range of permis-
sible specimen thick-
nesses.
Uses 16 mm (0.625
in.) diameter hemi-
spherical indenter.
Multi-directional
fiber laminates with
balanced and sym-
metric stacking se-
quences are usu-
ally used.
The damage re-
sponse is a func-
tion of the impactor
mass and
geometry, drop
height, support con-
ditions and speci-
men configuration.
Static Indentation and Impact Damage Tolerance Test Methods
D7137/D7137M Compression Residual
Strength and Deformation
Flat rectangular laminated
plate, previously damaged
through static indentation
or dropweight impact,
subjected to static com-
pressive loading with a
picture-frame test fixture.
Limited to continuous fiber
composites without
through-the-thickness re-
inforcement.
Results are very sensitive
to pre-existent damage
state, edge-restraint
conditions, and other pa-
rameters.
Narrow range of permis-
sible specimen thick-
nesses.
Multi-directional
fiber laminates with
balanced and sym-
metric stacking se-
quences are usu-
ally used.
Initial damage di-
ameter is limited to
half the specimen
width.
Results are specific
to the test configu-
ration and damage
state evaluated.
Trans-laminar Fracture Test Methods
E1922 Translaminar Fracture
Toughness, KTL
Flat rectangular specimen
containing an edge notch
loaded in tension.
Simple test to perform
Results only valid for the
particular laminate tested;
laminates producing large
damage zones do not
give valid values
Reinforcement Bar Test Methods
D7205/D7205M Composite Bar Tensile
Strength
Bar typically bonded with
anchors to avoid grip end
failures.
Nominal cross-sectional
area is determined
volumetrically, is an aver-
age value.
Specific to tensile
elements used in
reinforced,
prestressed, or
post-tensioned con-
crete.
D7337/D7337M Composite Bar Tensile
Creep Rupture
Same specimen as
D7205/D7205M, sub-
jected to a constant sus-
tained tensile force.
Same as D7205/D7205M.
Spare specimens must be
tested to attain minimum
specimen counts in case
invalid failures occur.
A minimum of four
force ratios are re-
quired to calculate
the one-million hour
creep rupture ca-
pacity.
D7617/D7617M Composite Bar
Transverse Shear
Strength
Bar loaded under trans-
verse shear using a
double shear cutting
blade test fixture. Used to
establish shear strength
of bars acting in dowel
action across cracks or
boundaries in concrete.
Range of bar diameters
accommodated by fixture
is limited. Blade dimen-
sions must closely match
bar outer diameter. Shims
required for close running
fit of blades.
Test fixture accom-
modates bars with
smooth and tex-
tured surfaces.
Test Methods for Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Matrix Composites Used to Strengthen Civil Structures
D7565/D7565M Tensile Properties
(Force/Width, Stiffness)
Provides procedures for
preparing
and testing FRP compos-
ites.
References D3039/
D3039M for specimen
testing.
Calculations are based
upon
force per unit width
due to high potential
variation
in FRP laminate thick-
ness.
Covers testing of
both
wet-layup and
preimpregnated
FRP composites.
D4762 − 11a
13
TABLE 3 Continued
Test Method Specimen Measured Property
Description and
Advantages
Disadvantages Comments
D7616/D7616M Apparent Overlap Splice
Shear Strength
Measures strength of a
wet-layup overlap splice
joint under far-field tensile
loading. References
D3039/D3039M for speci-
men testing. Primarily
used to define minimum
overlap splice length re-
quirements for wet layup
reinforcements.
Results are valid exclu-
sively for the overlap
splice joint geometry ex-
plicitly tested. Does not
provide a reliable mea-
sure of the bond lap
shear strength for design
analysis. Strength can be
affected by kinked splice
joint fibers and associated
loading eccentricity.
Provides detailed
specimen prepara-
tion procedures and
guidance for failure
mode characteriza-
tion.
D7522/D7522M Pull-Off Bond Strength Adhesion test device is
attached to a circular
sample of FRP bonded to
a concrete substrate. Ten-
sile force is applied nor-
mal to the plane of the
FRP-concrete bond. Used
in both laboratory and
field applications to con-
trol quality of FRP and
adhesives.
Results are sensitive to
system alignment, load
eccentricity, and specimen
uniformity.
Multiple failure
modes may be ob-
served at multiple
locations (FRP, ad-
hesive or concrete
substrate, or combi-
nations thereof).
FRP and concrete
must be scored to
define test section.
D4762 − 11a
14
TABLE 4 Sandwich Construction Test Methods
Test Method Specimen Measured Property Description and Advantages Disadvantages Comments
In-Plane Compression Test Methods
C364/C364M Sandwich Compressive
Strength
Untabbed, straight-sided
sandwich specimen which is
end-loaded.
Uses simple lateral end sup-
ports for load introduction.
Test is sensitive to unin-
tended loading eccentricities.
Requires that specimens be
bonded into lateral end sup-
ports.
Testing of specimens with
thin facings may require pot-
ting or tabs to resist end-
crushing.
Multiple failure modes may
be observed.
Acceptable failure modes in-
clude facesheet buckling,
facesheet compression,
facesheet dimpling, core
compression and core shear.
Out-of-Plane Tensile Test Methods
C297/C297M Sandwich or Core Flat-
wise Tensile Strength
Square or cylindrical gage
section sandwich or core
specimen loaded in through-
thickness tension.
Uses adhesively bonded thick
metal blocks for load intro-
duction.
Results are sensitive to sys-
tem alignment and load ec-
centricity.
Results are sensitive to adhe-
sive and surface preparation
at loading block bondlines.
Valid tests require failures
away from the loading block
bondline.
Used to assess and compare
core and core-to-facing
through-thickness tensile
strengths.
Out-of-Plane Compressive Test Methods
C365/C365M Core Flatwise
Compressive Strength,
Core Flatwise
Compressive Modulus
Square or cylindrical gage
section sandwich core speci-
men loaded in through-
thickness compression.
No test-specific fixtures are
required.
Results are sensitive to sys-
tem alignment, load
eccentricity, and thickness
variation which can cause
local crushing.
Core edges may need to be
stabilized using resin or fac-
ings to avoid local crushing.
Strength results must be re-
ported as stabilized or non-
stabilized.
Standard aerospace practice
uses stabilized specimens for
modulus determination.
D7336/D7336M Core Compressive
Crush Stress,
Core Crush Stroke
Square or cylindrical gage
section sandwich core speci-
men loaded in through-
thickness compression be-
yond intitial core failure.
Limited to honeycomb cores.
Results are sensitive to sys-
tem alignment, load
eccentricity, and core thick-
ness variation.
Specimen is often precrushed
to aid crush stroke determi-
nation and promote uniformity
of crush properties.
Out-of-Plane Shear Test Methods
C273/C273M Core Shear Strength,
Core Shear Modulus
Rectangular gage section
sandwich or core specimen
bonded to steel loading
plates.
Tensile or compressive load-
ing of assembly imparts a
through-thickness shear force
to the core.
Requires that specimens be
bonded to load plates.
Results are sensitive to adhe-
sive and surface preparation
at load plate bondlines.
Results are sensitive to sys-
tem alignment, load
eccentricity, and core thick-
ness variation.
Does not produce pure shear,
but secondary stress effects
are minimal.
C393/C393M Core Shear Strength,
Core Shear Modulus
Rectangular sandwich beam
specimen.
Ease of specimen construc-
tion and testing.
Includes both 3-point and
4-point techniques.
Core shear stiffness may be
determined using Practice
D7250/D7250M.
Method limited to 1D bend-
ing.
Failures often dominated by
stress concentrations and
secondary stresses at loading
points, especially for low-
density cores and thin fac-
ings.
Specified beam geometry
required to ensure simple
sandwich beam theory is
valid.
Specimen must be carefully
designed to obtain the de-
sired failure mode.
Specimen is designed to in-
duce core shear failure, but
failure may initiate in a non-
core element (facings, adhe-
sive) of the sandwich struc-
ture.
Span-to-depth ratio >20:1 is
recommended when testing
for shear modulus.
The ratio of face sheet thick-
ness to core thickness (t/c)
should be <0.10.
D4762 − 11a
15
TABLE 4 Continued
Test Method Specimen Measured Property Description and Advantages Disadvantages Comments
C394 Core Shear Stress Cycles
(S-N) Data
Specimen and apparatus
equivalent to C273/C273M,
except that core is bonded
directly to loading plates.
Same as C273/C273M.
Limited to non-reversed fa-
tigue loading conditions.
Same as C273/C273M.
Flexural Test Methods
D7249/D7249M Sandwich Flexural
Stiffness,
Facesheet Compressive
Strength,
Facesheet Tensile
Strength
Rectangular sandwich beam
specimen.
Ease of specimen construc-
tion and testing.
Standard geometry uses
4-point loading technique.
Flexural stiffness may be de-
termined using Practice
D7250/D7250M.
Method limited to 1D bend-
ing.
Failures often dominated by
stress concentrations and
secondary stresses at loading
points, especially with speci-
mens having low-density
cores and thin facings.
Specified beam geometry
required to ensure simple
sandwich beam theory is
valid.
Specimen must be carefully
designed to obtain the de-
sired failure mode.
Specimen is designed to in-
duce facing tensile or com-
pressive failure, but failure
may initiate in a non-facing
element (core, adhesive) of
the sandwich structure.
The ratio of face sheet thick-
ness to core thickness (t/c)
should be <0.10.
D5467/D5467M Facesheet Compressive
Strength,
Compressive Modulus,
Stress-Strain Response
Sandwich beam specimen
loaded in 4-point bending.
Intended result is a compres-
sion failure mode of the
facesheet.
Data is especially applicable
to sandwich structures.
Fixturing is simple compared
to other compression tests.
Limited to high-modulus com-
posites.
An expensive specimen that
is not recommended unless
the structure warrants its use.
Strain gages required to ob-
tain modulus and strain-to-
failure data.
Must take care to avoid core
failure modes.
Narrow (1 in. wide) specimen
may not be suitable for mate-
rials with coarse features,
such as fabrics with large
filament count tows (12K or
more) or certain braided ma-
terials.
D6416/D6416M Pressure-Deflection
Response,
Pressure-Strain
Response,
Sandwich Bending and
Shear Stiffness
Two-dimensional plate flexure
induced by a well-defined
distributed load.
Apparatus, instrumentation
ensure applied pressure dis-
tribution is known. Failures
typically initiate away from
edges.
Specimens are relatively
large, facilitating study of
manufacturing defects and
process variables.
For studies of failure me-
chanics and other quantita-
tive sandwich analyses, only
small panel deflections are
allowed.
The test fixture is necessarily
more elaborate, and some
calibration is required to
verify simply-supported
boundary conditions.
Results highly dependent
upon panel edge boundary
conditions and pressure dis-
tribution.
Relatively large specimen
and support fixture geometry.
The same caveats applying
to D7249/D7249M (above)
could apply to D6416/
D6416M.
However, this method is not
limited to sandwich compos-
ites; D6416/D6416M can be
used to evaluate the
2-dimensional flexural proper-
ties of any square plate.
Distributed load is provided
using a water-filled bladder.
Ratio of support span to av-
erage sandwich specimen
thickness should be between
10 to 30.
C480/C480M Flexural Deflection versus
Time
Flat rectangular sandwich
beam specimen loaded in
3-point bending.
Failures often dominated by
stress concentrations and
secondary stresses at loading
points.
Specimen must be carefully
designed to obtain the de-
sired failure mode.
Loading is imparted to the
sandwich beam using a
weight attached to a lever
arm.
Core Constituent Property Test Methods
C271/C271M Core Density Flat rectangular sandwich
core specimen.
Results are sensitive to
length, width and thickness
variation.
C366/C366M Core Thickness Flat rectangular sandwich
core specimen.
Two methods provided (roller,
disk).
Results are sensitive to ap-
plied pressure during mea-
surement.
C272 Core Water Absorption Flat rectangular sandwich
core specimen.
Two methods provided
(immersion, humidity condi-
tioning).
Results are sensitive to water
collected on surfaces.
For specimens that collect
water on surfaces, specimens
may be dipped in alcohol
which is allowed to evapo-
rate.
D4762 − 11a
16
TABLE 4 Continued
Test Method Specimen Measured Property Description and Advantages Disadvantages Comments
F1645/F1645M Honeycomb Core Water
Migration
Flat rectangular sandwich
core specimen bonded to
transparent facings.
Water is introduced into one
cell and permeates through
the sample.
Results are sensitive to the
permeability of the facings
and adhesive.
A constant head of water
must be maintained to ensure
consistent pressure.
Water migration may be
monitored either by mass or
volumetric measurement.
Colored dye may be added to
water to aid in visualizing mi-
gration.
C363/C363M Honeycomb Core Node
Tensile Strength
Flat rectangular sandwich
core specimen.
Specimen ends are pinned
into loading fixture which is
loaded in tension.
Strength is sensitive to speci-
men alignment and load ec-
centricity.
Failure can be dominated by
stress concentration at load
introduction locations.
Property formerly entitled
core delamination strength.
D6772 Honeycomb Core Dimen-
sional Stability
Flat rectangular sandwich
core specimen, measures
in-plane core dimensional
stability after thermal expo-
sure.
Requires accurate geometric
measurement of core defor-
mation after thermal expo-
sure.
Recommended to pot se-
lected cells with resin or ad-
hesive to aid deformation
measurement.
D6790 Honeycomb Core Pois-
son’s Ratio
Flat square sandwich core
specimen.
Specimen is bent around a
cylinder.
Dimensional measurements
are used to determine Pois-
son’s ratio.
Requires accurate geometric
measurement of core deflec-
tion.
D4762 − 11a
17
TABLE 5 Constituent/Precursor/Thermophysical Test Methods
Test Method Specimen Measured Property
Description and
Advantages
Disadvantages Comments
Reinforcement Property Test Methods
D3800 Fiber Density Test method for density of
high-modulus continuous
and discontinuous fibers.
D4018 Carbon Fiber Tow Proper-
ties:
-Tensile Modulus
-Tensile Strength
-Density
-Mass per Unit Length
-Sizing Content
-Moisture Absorption
Provides test methods for
continuous filament car-
bon and graphite yarns,
rovings and tows.
Tensile properties are de-
termined using resin-
impregnated fiber.
Tensile testing requires
careful specimen prepara-
tion.
The resin used to impreg-
nate the fibers can affect
the tensile test results.
D4102 Fiber Weight Loss Test method for determin-
ing weight loss of carbon
fibers exposed to hot am-
bient air.
Exposure conditions are:
-24 h at 375°C (707°F).
-500 h at 315°C (600°F).
Determines oxidative re-
sistance of carbon fibers
for use in high-
temperature applications.
Matrix (Resin) Physical Property Test Methods
D792 Density Test method for density of
plastics using immersion
methods.
Ease of test specimen
preparation and testing.
Some specimens may be
affected by water; alter-
nate immersion liquids are
optional.
D1505 Density Test method for density of
plastics using density gra-
dient method.
Typically used for film and
sheeting materials
D2471 Gel Time Test method for determin-
ing gel time and peak
exothermic temperature of
reacting thermosetting
resins
Used for testing neat res-
ins. For composite
prepregs, see D3532 be-
low.
D4473 Cure Behavior Test method for cure be-
havior of plastics by mea-
suring dynamic mechani-
cal properties.
Extent of Cure Test Methods
D3531 Resin Flow Test method for resin flow
of prepreg tape or sheet
using square 2-ply speci-
men heated in a platen
press.
Limited to carbon fiber-
epoxy prepreg materials.
D3532 Gel Time Test method for gel time
of prepreg tape or sheet
Limited to carbon fiber-
epoxy prepreg materials.
Constituent Content Test Methods
C613/C613M Constituent Content Test method for Soxhlet
extraction procedure to
determine the matrix
content, reinforcement
content, and filler content
of composite material
prepreg.
Limited to prepreg materi-
als.
Not suitable for cured
composites.
D3171 Fiber, Resin, Void Content Test method for fiber,
resin, and void content of
resin-matrix composites
by either digestion of the
matrix or by thickness of
a material of known fiber
areal weight (void content
not determined).
Includes methods for
metal matrix composites
as well.
The resin digestion meth-
ods are primarily intended
for cured thermoset matri-
ces but may also be suit-
able for some thermoplas-
tics as well as prepreg
resin content for materials
that do not respond well
to other methods.
Constituent Content Test Methods (cont’d)
D4762 − 11a
18
TABLE 5 Continued
Test Method Specimen Measured Property
Description and
Advantages
Disadvantages Comments
D3529/D3529M Resin Content Test method for matrix
solids content and matrix
content using extraction
by organic solvent.
Limited to prepreg materi-
als.
Resins that have started
to cross-link (for example,
B-staged resins) may be
difficult to extract; D3171
methods are recom-
mended for these materi-
als.
Does not determine or
require reporting of rein-
forcement content.
Not suitable for cured
composites.
D3530/D3530M Volatiles Content Test method for volatiles
content of epoxy-matrix
prepreg tape and sheet
Limited to prepreg materi-
als.
Limited to reinforcement
material types which are
substantially unaffected
by the temperature se-
lected for use in removing
volatiles from the matrix
material.
Not suitable for cured
composites.
D2734 Void Content Test methods for void
content of reinforced plas-
tics.
Ease of test specimen
preparation and testing.
Limited to composites for
which the effects of igni-
tion on the materials are
known.
May not be suitable for
reinforcements consisting
of metals, organic
materials, or inorganic
materials that may gain or
lose weight.
The presence of filler in
some composites is not
accounted for.
D3171 is preferred for
advanced composites.
Void content of less than
1 % is difficult to measure
accurately.
D2584 Resin Content Test method for ignition
loss of cured reinforced
resins.
Ease of test specimen
preparation and testing.
The presence of filler in
some composites is not
accounted for.
D3171 is preferred for
advanced composites.
Result may be used as
resin content under speci-
fied limitations.
Thermo-Physical Test Methods
D696 Thermal Expansion ver-
sus Temperature Curves,
Coefficients of Thermal
Expansion
Test method for linear
thermal expansion of
plastic materials having
coefficients of expansion
greater than 1 × 10-6
/°C
by use of a vitreous silica
dilatometer. Ease of test
specimen preparation and
testing.
Suitable for random and
continuous fiber compos-
ites.
Limited to temperature
range of -30°C to 30°C.
Use E228 for other tem-
peratures.
This test method cannot
be used for very low ther-
mal expansion coefficient
materials, such as unidi-
rectional graphite fiber
composites.
E228 Thermal Expansion ver-
sus Temperature Curves,
Coefficients of Thermal
Expansion
Test method for linear
thermal expansion over
the temperature range of
-180 to 900°C using vitre-
ous silica push rod or
tube dilatometers.
Suitable for discontinuous
or continuous fiber com-
posites of defined orienta-
tion state.
Good for low values of
thermal expansion.
Precision greater than for
D696.
Precision significantly
lower than for E289.
Thermo-Physical Test Methods (cont’d)
D4762 − 11a
19
TABLE 5 Continued
Test Method Specimen Measured Property
Description and
Advantages
Disadvantages Comments
E289 Thermal Expansion ver-
sus Temperature Curves,
Coefficients of Thermal
Expansion
Test method for linear
thermal expansion of rigid
solids using either a Mi-
chelson or Fizeau interfer-
ometer.
Suitable for composites
with very low values of
thermal expansion.
Precision is listed as bet-
ter than +40 nm/m/K.
E1461 Thermal Diffusivity Uses laser flash tech-
nique.
With specific heat
measurement, can be
used to calculate thermal
conductivity indirectly.
E1269 Specific Heat Uses Differential Scan-
ning Calorimetry.
Transition Temperature Test Methods
D648 Heat Deflection Tempera-
ture
Test method for determin-
ing temperature at which
an arbitrary deformation
occurs when specimen is
subjected to an arbitrary
set of testing conditions.
Ease of test specimen
preparation and testing.
Deflection temperature is
dependent on specimen
thickness and fiber rein-
forcement variables.
Test data used for mate-
rial screening.
Test data is not intended
for design purposes.
D3418 Glass Transition Tempera-
ture (Tg)
Test method for determi-
nation of transition tem-
peratures of polymers by
differential thermal analy-
sis or differential scanning
calorimetry (DSC).
Ease of test specimen
preparation and testing.
Not suitable for compos-
ites with low resin con-
tent.
The correlation between
thermally measured tran-
sition temperatures and
mechanical property tran-
sitions has not been suit-
ably established.
D4065 Transition Temperatures,
Elastic Moduli,
Loss Moduli
Practice for determining
the transition
temperatures, elastic, and
loss moduli of plastics
over a range of
temperatures,
frequencies, or time, by
free vibration and reso-
nant or nonresonant
forced vibration tech-
niques.
Can use variety of test
specimen geometries and
loading methods.
Requires specialized
equipment.
For best results, tests
should be run on unrein-
forced resin.
D7028 Glass Transition Tempera-
ture (DMA Tg)
Test method for determin-
ing the glass transition
temperature (Tg) of com-
posites using Dynamic
Mechanical Analysis
(DMA) in flexural loading
mode. Tests can be per-
formed using both dry and
wet specimens (moisture
conditioned) to allow for
comparison.
Requires specialized
equipment. Results are
sensitive to the oscillation
frequency, heating rate
and specimen/test geom-
etries.
Intended for polymer ma-
trix composites reinforced
by continuous, oriented,
high modulus fibers. One
of the major fiber direc-
tions must be parallel to
the length of the
specimen.
D4762 − 11a
20
ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned
in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk
of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility.
This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and
if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards
and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the
responsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should
make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below.
This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959,
United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above
address or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or service@astm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website
(www.astm.org). Permission rights to photocopy the standard may also be secured from the Copyright Clearance Center, 222
Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, Tel: (978) 646-2600; http://www.copyright.com/
TABLE 6 Environmental Conditioning/Resistance Test Methods
Test Method Specimen Measured Property
Description and
Advantages
Disadvantages Comments
Equilibrium Moisture Content/Conditioning Test Methods
D5229/D5229M Through-Thickness Mois-
ture Diffusivity,
Equilibrium Moisture
Content, Equilibrium Con-
ditioning
Rigorous determination of
moisture equilibrium for
various exposure levels
(including dry) as well as
moisture absorption con-
stants.
Used for conditioning test
coupons prior to use in
other test methods
Requires long-
conditioning times for
many materials.
Assumes 1-D Fickian be-
havior for material absorp-
tion constant determina-
tion.
A faster two-specimen
approach documented in
MIL-HDBK-17 has not yet
been included in this stan-
dard.
D570 Equilibrium Percentage
Increase in Weight
Determination of equilib-
rium weight increase due
to long-term immersion in
water.
Weighing schedule is in-
dependent of material dif-
fusion characteristics.
D5229/D5229M is pre-
ferred for general mois-
ture conditioning of com-
posites.
Non-Equilibrium Conditioning Test Methods
D618 None. Test method for condition-
ing plastics prior to test.
No standard mechanical
tests are specified.
Weight gain is not moni-
tored.
Not recommended for
conditioning composites.
D570 Percentage Increase in
Weight
Determination of weight
increase due to immer-
sion in water for a defined
period.
Multiple conditioning op-
tions are provided, with
limited guidance provided
on selection of param-
eters.
D5229/D5229M is pre-
ferred for general mois-
ture conditioning of com-
posites.
Environmental Aging Test Methods
C481 Property Retention After
Aging
Sandwich construction
specimens subjected to
environmental aging
cycles.
Standard environmental
cycles may not be repre-
sentative of all sandwich
construction applications.
Two standard aging
cycles are defined.
Chemical Resistance Test Methods
C581 Changes to: Hardness,
Weight,
Thickness,
Specimen Appearance
Appearance of Immersion
Media,
Flexural Strength,
Flexural Modulus.
Test method for chemical
resistance of thermoset-
ting resins.
Ease of test specimen
preparation and testing.
Flexible exposure condi-
tions.
The only mechanical tests
specified are flexural.
Weight gain is not moni-
tored.
No standard exposure
times or temperatures are
specified.
Exposure chemicals,
times, temperatures are
left to the user’s discre-
tion.
D543 Changes to: Weight,
Thickness,
Specimen Appearance
Tensile Strength,
Tensile Modulus.
Practices for evaluating
the resistance of plastics
to chemical reagents.
Standard exposure time
and temperature set as a
starting point.
The only mechanical load-
ing type specified is ten-
sile; others are optional
Longer exposure times
may be desirable.
Other mechanical loading
types may be specified.
D4762 − 11a
21

More Related Content

What's hot

Apostila 1 pilares torção-ufrj-2010
Apostila 1  pilares torção-ufrj-2010Apostila 1  pilares torção-ufrj-2010
Apostila 1 pilares torção-ufrj-2010Gabriel Jaña
 
Modelo de distrato
Modelo de distratoModelo de distrato
Modelo de distratoRosane Sene
 
Sample motion to compel deposition subpoena in california
Sample motion to compel deposition subpoena in californiaSample motion to compel deposition subpoena in california
Sample motion to compel deposition subpoena in californiaLegalDocsPro
 
Sample motion for protective order for deposition in California
Sample motion for protective order for deposition in CaliforniaSample motion for protective order for deposition in California
Sample motion for protective order for deposition in CaliforniaLegalDocsPro
 
Abnt 6118 projeto de estruturas de concreto -procedimento
Abnt 6118  projeto de estruturas de concreto -procedimentoAbnt 6118  projeto de estruturas de concreto -procedimento
Abnt 6118 projeto de estruturas de concreto -procedimentocarlospradojr2
 
Sample California motion for leave to amend pleading
Sample California motion for leave to amend pleadingSample California motion for leave to amend pleading
Sample California motion for leave to amend pleadingLegalDocsPro
 
1159- Contrarrazões de Recurso Inominado 2
1159- Contrarrazões de Recurso Inominado 21159- Contrarrazões de Recurso Inominado 2
1159- Contrarrazões de Recurso Inominado 2Consultor JRSantana
 
43640380 mecanica-vetorial[2]
43640380 mecanica-vetorial[2]43640380 mecanica-vetorial[2]
43640380 mecanica-vetorial[2]afpinto
 
Dimensionamento de Elementos Estruturais de Aço e Mistos Aço e Concreto.pdf
Dimensionamento de Elementos Estruturais de Aço e Mistos Aço e Concreto.pdfDimensionamento de Elementos Estruturais de Aço e Mistos Aço e Concreto.pdf
Dimensionamento de Elementos Estruturais de Aço e Mistos Aço e Concreto.pdfEstevaoAquino
 
Aula 1 mecânica aplicada
Aula 1   mecânica aplicada Aula 1   mecânica aplicada
Aula 1 mecânica aplicada Juliana Jeniffer
 
Tabela momento de inercia , w, i
Tabela  momento de inercia , w, iTabela  momento de inercia , w, i
Tabela momento de inercia , w, iricao
 
Contrato De PrestaçãO De ServiçOs De ManutençãO De Web Site
Contrato De PrestaçãO De ServiçOs De ManutençãO De Web SiteContrato De PrestaçãO De ServiçOs De ManutençãO De Web Site
Contrato De PrestaçãO De ServiçOs De ManutençãO De Web SiteRodolfo Rodrigo Acosta
 
2133 - Tutela Cautelar Antecedente - Reduzida - Novo CPC
2133 - Tutela Cautelar Antecedente - Reduzida - Novo CPC2133 - Tutela Cautelar Antecedente - Reduzida - Novo CPC
2133 - Tutela Cautelar Antecedente - Reduzida - Novo CPCConsultor JRSantana
 
Impugnação a contestação
Impugnação a contestaçãoImpugnação a contestação
Impugnação a contestaçãovandaloverde1234
 
Aditamento à petição inicial cível
Aditamento à petição inicial cívelAditamento à petição inicial cível
Aditamento à petição inicial cívelSandra Dória
 
CA Heggstad 850 Probate Petition Los Angeles
CA Heggstad 850 Probate Petition Los AngelesCA Heggstad 850 Probate Petition Los Angeles
CA Heggstad 850 Probate Petition Los AngelesMark Hackard
 
Aula 4 vibração forçada hamonicamente sem e com amortecimento 1 gdl
Aula 4 vibração forçada hamonicamente sem e com amortecimento  1 gdlAula 4 vibração forçada hamonicamente sem e com amortecimento  1 gdl
Aula 4 vibração forçada hamonicamente sem e com amortecimento 1 gdlJunior Tonial Espinha
 
Reclamatória Trabalhista
Reclamatória TrabalhistaReclamatória Trabalhista
Reclamatória Trabalhistaromeromelosilva
 
Sample California complaint to vacate judgment
Sample California complaint to vacate judgmentSample California complaint to vacate judgment
Sample California complaint to vacate judgmentLegalDocsPro
 

What's hot (20)

Apostila 1 pilares torção-ufrj-2010
Apostila 1  pilares torção-ufrj-2010Apostila 1  pilares torção-ufrj-2010
Apostila 1 pilares torção-ufrj-2010
 
Modelo de distrato
Modelo de distratoModelo de distrato
Modelo de distrato
 
Sample motion to compel deposition subpoena in california
Sample motion to compel deposition subpoena in californiaSample motion to compel deposition subpoena in california
Sample motion to compel deposition subpoena in california
 
Sample motion for protective order for deposition in California
Sample motion for protective order for deposition in CaliforniaSample motion for protective order for deposition in California
Sample motion for protective order for deposition in California
 
Abnt 6118 projeto de estruturas de concreto -procedimento
Abnt 6118  projeto de estruturas de concreto -procedimentoAbnt 6118  projeto de estruturas de concreto -procedimento
Abnt 6118 projeto de estruturas de concreto -procedimento
 
Sample California motion for leave to amend pleading
Sample California motion for leave to amend pleadingSample California motion for leave to amend pleading
Sample California motion for leave to amend pleading
 
1159- Contrarrazões de Recurso Inominado 2
1159- Contrarrazões de Recurso Inominado 21159- Contrarrazões de Recurso Inominado 2
1159- Contrarrazões de Recurso Inominado 2
 
43640380 mecanica-vetorial[2]
43640380 mecanica-vetorial[2]43640380 mecanica-vetorial[2]
43640380 mecanica-vetorial[2]
 
Dimensionamento de Elementos Estruturais de Aço e Mistos Aço e Concreto.pdf
Dimensionamento de Elementos Estruturais de Aço e Mistos Aço e Concreto.pdfDimensionamento de Elementos Estruturais de Aço e Mistos Aço e Concreto.pdf
Dimensionamento de Elementos Estruturais de Aço e Mistos Aço e Concreto.pdf
 
Aula 1 mecânica aplicada
Aula 1   mecânica aplicada Aula 1   mecânica aplicada
Aula 1 mecânica aplicada
 
Conc11
Conc11Conc11
Conc11
 
Tabela momento de inercia , w, i
Tabela  momento de inercia , w, iTabela  momento de inercia , w, i
Tabela momento de inercia , w, i
 
Contrato De PrestaçãO De ServiçOs De ManutençãO De Web Site
Contrato De PrestaçãO De ServiçOs De ManutençãO De Web SiteContrato De PrestaçãO De ServiçOs De ManutençãO De Web Site
Contrato De PrestaçãO De ServiçOs De ManutençãO De Web Site
 
2133 - Tutela Cautelar Antecedente - Reduzida - Novo CPC
2133 - Tutela Cautelar Antecedente - Reduzida - Novo CPC2133 - Tutela Cautelar Antecedente - Reduzida - Novo CPC
2133 - Tutela Cautelar Antecedente - Reduzida - Novo CPC
 
Impugnação a contestação
Impugnação a contestaçãoImpugnação a contestação
Impugnação a contestação
 
Aditamento à petição inicial cível
Aditamento à petição inicial cívelAditamento à petição inicial cível
Aditamento à petição inicial cível
 
CA Heggstad 850 Probate Petition Los Angeles
CA Heggstad 850 Probate Petition Los AngelesCA Heggstad 850 Probate Petition Los Angeles
CA Heggstad 850 Probate Petition Los Angeles
 
Aula 4 vibração forçada hamonicamente sem e com amortecimento 1 gdl
Aula 4 vibração forçada hamonicamente sem e com amortecimento  1 gdlAula 4 vibração forçada hamonicamente sem e com amortecimento  1 gdl
Aula 4 vibração forçada hamonicamente sem e com amortecimento 1 gdl
 
Reclamatória Trabalhista
Reclamatória TrabalhistaReclamatória Trabalhista
Reclamatória Trabalhista
 
Sample California complaint to vacate judgment
Sample California complaint to vacate judgmentSample California complaint to vacate judgment
Sample California complaint to vacate judgment
 

Similar to D4762.7410 Testing Polymer Matrix Composite Materials.pdf

Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics
Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of PlasticsStandard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics
Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of PlasticsTuongBinhMinh1
 
D6641D6641M.39883 Compressive Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite.pdf
D6641D6641M.39883 Compressive Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite.pdfD6641D6641M.39883 Compressive Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite.pdf
D6641D6641M.39883 Compressive Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite.pdfmahmoodkhan77
 
D3410D3410M.27027 Compressive Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite.pdf
D3410D3410M.27027 Compressive Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite.pdfD3410D3410M.27027 Compressive Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite.pdf
D3410D3410M.27027 Compressive Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite.pdfmahmoodkhan77
 
D3039D3039M.11914.pdf
D3039D3039M.11914.pdfD3039D3039M.11914.pdf
D3039D3039M.11914.pdfmahmoodkhan77
 
Ac physical prop_040519_knit
Ac physical prop_040519_knitAc physical prop_040519_knit
Ac physical prop_040519_knitnguyenviet296860
 
D3039D3039M.11914 2.pdf
D3039D3039M.11914 2.pdfD3039D3039M.11914 2.pdf
D3039D3039M.11914 2.pdfmahmoodkhan77
 
Mechanical Testing 3d Printed Parts and Materials
Mechanical Testing 3d Printed Parts and MaterialsMechanical Testing 3d Printed Parts and Materials
Mechanical Testing 3d Printed Parts and MaterialsKartik Srinivas
 
TN_Resin Quality and Impact on Performance for HDPE Geomembranes_REV0515
TN_Resin Quality and Impact on Performance for HDPE Geomembranes_REV0515TN_Resin Quality and Impact on Performance for HDPE Geomembranes_REV0515
TN_Resin Quality and Impact on Performance for HDPE Geomembranes_REV0515Sara Rahme
 
Hannes_Koerber_Sandwich_Composites_EN.pdf
Hannes_Koerber_Sandwich_Composites_EN.pdfHannes_Koerber_Sandwich_Composites_EN.pdf
Hannes_Koerber_Sandwich_Composites_EN.pdfAlexandraPetre18
 
Effect of Loading Rates on Short-Beam Shear Testing of Fiberglass Reinforced ...
Effect of Loading Rates on Short-Beam Shear Testing of Fiberglass Reinforced ...Effect of Loading Rates on Short-Beam Shear Testing of Fiberglass Reinforced ...
Effect of Loading Rates on Short-Beam Shear Testing of Fiberglass Reinforced ...Christopher (C.G.) Cruz
 
B03403007011
B03403007011B03403007011
B03403007011theijes
 
IRJET- Analysis of FRP in Strengthened RC Columns
IRJET- Analysis of FRP in Strengthened RC ColumnsIRJET- Analysis of FRP in Strengthened RC Columns
IRJET- Analysis of FRP in Strengthened RC ColumnsIRJET Journal
 
Indirect Tensile Strength of Modified Bitumen Mixture
Indirect Tensile Strength of Modified Bitumen MixtureIndirect Tensile Strength of Modified Bitumen Mixture
Indirect Tensile Strength of Modified Bitumen Mixturedbpublications
 

Similar to D4762.7410 Testing Polymer Matrix Composite Materials.pdf (20)

Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics
Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of PlasticsStandard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics
Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics
 
D6641D6641M.39883 Compressive Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite.pdf
D6641D6641M.39883 Compressive Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite.pdfD6641D6641M.39883 Compressive Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite.pdf
D6641D6641M.39883 Compressive Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite.pdf
 
D638.pdf
D638.pdfD638.pdf
D638.pdf
 
D3410D3410M.27027 Compressive Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite.pdf
D3410D3410M.27027 Compressive Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite.pdfD3410D3410M.27027 Compressive Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite.pdf
D3410D3410M.27027 Compressive Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite.pdf
 
D3039D3039M.11914.pdf
D3039D3039M.11914.pdfD3039D3039M.11914.pdf
D3039D3039M.11914.pdf
 
D1883.13825
D1883.13825D1883.13825
D1883.13825
 
D4153
D4153D4153
D4153
 
Ac physical prop_040519_knit
Ac physical prop_040519_knitAc physical prop_040519_knit
Ac physical prop_040519_knit
 
D3039D3039M.11914 2.pdf
D3039D3039M.11914 2.pdfD3039D3039M.11914 2.pdf
D3039D3039M.11914 2.pdf
 
Astm d429-03
Astm d429-03Astm d429-03
Astm d429-03
 
C29 c29m.30172
C29 c29m.30172C29 c29m.30172
C29 c29m.30172
 
Mechanical Testing 3d Printed Parts and Materials
Mechanical Testing 3d Printed Parts and MaterialsMechanical Testing 3d Printed Parts and Materials
Mechanical Testing 3d Printed Parts and Materials
 
TN_Resin Quality and Impact on Performance for HDPE Geomembranes_REV0515
TN_Resin Quality and Impact on Performance for HDPE Geomembranes_REV0515TN_Resin Quality and Impact on Performance for HDPE Geomembranes_REV0515
TN_Resin Quality and Impact on Performance for HDPE Geomembranes_REV0515
 
Hannes_Koerber_Sandwich_Composites_EN.pdf
Hannes_Koerber_Sandwich_Composites_EN.pdfHannes_Koerber_Sandwich_Composites_EN.pdf
Hannes_Koerber_Sandwich_Composites_EN.pdf
 
Effect of Loading Rates on Short-Beam Shear Testing of Fiberglass Reinforced ...
Effect of Loading Rates on Short-Beam Shear Testing of Fiberglass Reinforced ...Effect of Loading Rates on Short-Beam Shear Testing of Fiberglass Reinforced ...
Effect of Loading Rates on Short-Beam Shear Testing of Fiberglass Reinforced ...
 
B03403007011
B03403007011B03403007011
B03403007011
 
D1004.pdf
D1004.pdfD1004.pdf
D1004.pdf
 
IRJET- Analysis of FRP in Strengthened RC Columns
IRJET- Analysis of FRP in Strengthened RC ColumnsIRJET- Analysis of FRP in Strengthened RC Columns
IRJET- Analysis of FRP in Strengthened RC Columns
 
Indirect Tensile Strength of Modified Bitumen Mixture
Indirect Tensile Strength of Modified Bitumen MixtureIndirect Tensile Strength of Modified Bitumen Mixture
Indirect Tensile Strength of Modified Bitumen Mixture
 
Adhesion testing, adhesive testing
Adhesion testing, adhesive testingAdhesion testing, adhesive testing
Adhesion testing, adhesive testing
 

More from mahmoodkhan77

E23.33234 Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Ma...
E23.33234 Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Ma...E23.33234 Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Ma...
E23.33234 Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Ma...mahmoodkhan77
 
E384.23604 Microindentation Hardness of Materials.pdf
E384.23604 Microindentation Hardness of Materials.pdfE384.23604 Microindentation Hardness of Materials.pdf
E384.23604 Microindentation Hardness of Materials.pdfmahmoodkhan77
 
ASTM Standard Practice for Ultrasonic Testing of Wrought Products.pdf
ASTM Standard Practice for Ultrasonic Testing of Wrought Products.pdfASTM Standard Practice for Ultrasonic Testing of Wrought Products.pdf
ASTM Standard Practice for Ultrasonic Testing of Wrought Products.pdfmahmoodkhan77
 
E407.38307 Microetching Metals and Alloys1.pdf
E407.38307 Microetching Metals and Alloys1.pdfE407.38307 Microetching Metals and Alloys1.pdf
E407.38307 Microetching Metals and Alloys1.pdfmahmoodkhan77
 
Nondestructive Characterization for Metal-Matrix Composite Fabrication.pdf
Nondestructive Characterization for Metal-Matrix Composite Fabrication.pdfNondestructive Characterization for Metal-Matrix Composite Fabrication.pdf
Nondestructive Characterization for Metal-Matrix Composite Fabrication.pdfmahmoodkhan77
 
E8E8M.31295 Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.pdf
E8E8M.31295 Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.pdfE8E8M.31295 Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.pdf
E8E8M.31295 Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.pdfmahmoodkhan77
 
ASTM E1558, Standard Guide for Electrolytic Polishing of Metallographic Speci...
ASTM E1558, Standard Guide for Electrolytic Polishing of Metallographic Speci...ASTM E1558, Standard Guide for Electrolytic Polishing of Metallographic Speci...
ASTM E1558, Standard Guide for Electrolytic Polishing of Metallographic Speci...mahmoodkhan77
 
E8E8M.3597 Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.pdf
E8E8M.3597 Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.pdfE8E8M.3597 Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.pdf
E8E8M.3597 Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.pdfmahmoodkhan77
 
E8E8M.4876 Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.pdf
E8E8M.4876 Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.pdfE8E8M.4876 Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.pdf
E8E8M.4876 Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.pdfmahmoodkhan77
 
D3878.40664 Standard Terminology for Composite Materials.pdf
D3878.40664 Standard Terminology for Composite Materials.pdfD3878.40664 Standard Terminology for Composite Materials.pdf
D3878.40664 Standard Terminology for Composite Materials.pdfmahmoodkhan77
 
Nuclear energy is better than solar and wind — Sustainable Review.pdf
Nuclear energy is better than solar and wind — Sustainable Review.pdfNuclear energy is better than solar and wind — Sustainable Review.pdf
Nuclear energy is better than solar and wind — Sustainable Review.pdfmahmoodkhan77
 
Solar Power Vs Nuclear Power - Which is the Better Energy Source_.pdf
Solar Power Vs Nuclear Power - Which is the Better Energy Source_.pdfSolar Power Vs Nuclear Power - Which is the Better Energy Source_.pdf
Solar Power Vs Nuclear Power - Which is the Better Energy Source_.pdfmahmoodkhan77
 
Current Status Pakistan.pdf
Current Status Pakistan.pdfCurrent Status Pakistan.pdf
Current Status Pakistan.pdfmahmoodkhan77
 
solar-nuclear-energy.pdf
solar-nuclear-energy.pdfsolar-nuclear-energy.pdf
solar-nuclear-energy.pdfmahmoodkhan77
 

More from mahmoodkhan77 (19)

E23.33234 Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Ma...
E23.33234 Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Ma...E23.33234 Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Ma...
E23.33234 Standard Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Ma...
 
E384.23604 Microindentation Hardness of Materials.pdf
E384.23604 Microindentation Hardness of Materials.pdfE384.23604 Microindentation Hardness of Materials.pdf
E384.23604 Microindentation Hardness of Materials.pdf
 
ASTM Standard Practice for Ultrasonic Testing of Wrought Products.pdf
ASTM Standard Practice for Ultrasonic Testing of Wrought Products.pdfASTM Standard Practice for Ultrasonic Testing of Wrought Products.pdf
ASTM Standard Practice for Ultrasonic Testing of Wrought Products.pdf
 
E407.38307 Microetching Metals and Alloys1.pdf
E407.38307 Microetching Metals and Alloys1.pdfE407.38307 Microetching Metals and Alloys1.pdf
E407.38307 Microetching Metals and Alloys1.pdf
 
Nondestructive Characterization for Metal-Matrix Composite Fabrication.pdf
Nondestructive Characterization for Metal-Matrix Composite Fabrication.pdfNondestructive Characterization for Metal-Matrix Composite Fabrication.pdf
Nondestructive Characterization for Metal-Matrix Composite Fabrication.pdf
 
E8E8M.31295 Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.pdf
E8E8M.31295 Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.pdfE8E8M.31295 Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.pdf
E8E8M.31295 Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.pdf
 
ASTM E1558, Standard Guide for Electrolytic Polishing of Metallographic Speci...
ASTM E1558, Standard Guide for Electrolytic Polishing of Metallographic Speci...ASTM E1558, Standard Guide for Electrolytic Polishing of Metallographic Speci...
ASTM E1558, Standard Guide for Electrolytic Polishing of Metallographic Speci...
 
B557M.24957.pdf
B557M.24957.pdfB557M.24957.pdf
B557M.24957.pdf
 
E8E8M.3597 Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.pdf
E8E8M.3597 Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.pdfE8E8M.3597 Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.pdf
E8E8M.3597 Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.pdf
 
E8E8M.4876 Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.pdf
E8E8M.4876 Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.pdfE8E8M.4876 Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.pdf
E8E8M.4876 Tension Testing of Metallic Materials.pdf
 
D2584.21532.pdf
D2584.21532.pdfD2584.21532.pdf
D2584.21532.pdf
 
D3878.40664 Standard Terminology for Composite Materials.pdf
D3878.40664 Standard Terminology for Composite Materials.pdfD3878.40664 Standard Terminology for Composite Materials.pdf
D3878.40664 Standard Terminology for Composite Materials.pdf
 
72177.pdf
72177.pdf72177.pdf
72177.pdf
 
Nuclear energy is better than solar and wind — Sustainable Review.pdf
Nuclear energy is better than solar and wind — Sustainable Review.pdfNuclear energy is better than solar and wind — Sustainable Review.pdf
Nuclear energy is better than solar and wind — Sustainable Review.pdf
 
Solar Power Vs Nuclear Power - Which is the Better Energy Source_.pdf
Solar Power Vs Nuclear Power - Which is the Better Energy Source_.pdfSolar Power Vs Nuclear Power - Which is the Better Energy Source_.pdf
Solar Power Vs Nuclear Power - Which is the Better Energy Source_.pdf
 
Current Status Pakistan.pdf
Current Status Pakistan.pdfCurrent Status Pakistan.pdf
Current Status Pakistan.pdf
 
solar-nuclear-energy.pdf
solar-nuclear-energy.pdfsolar-nuclear-energy.pdf
solar-nuclear-energy.pdf
 
Solar power.pdf
Solar power.pdfSolar power.pdf
Solar power.pdf
 
21104091117.pdf
21104091117.pdf21104091117.pdf
21104091117.pdf
 

Recently uploaded

The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth 8250192130 Will You Miss Thi...
The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth 8250192130 Will You Miss Thi...The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth 8250192130 Will You Miss Thi...
The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth 8250192130 Will You Miss Thi...ranjana rawat
 
College Call Girls Nashik Nehal 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Nashik
College Call Girls Nashik Nehal 7001305949 Independent Escort Service NashikCollege Call Girls Nashik Nehal 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Nashik
College Call Girls Nashik Nehal 7001305949 Independent Escort Service NashikCall Girls in Nagpur High Profile
 
High Profile Call Girls Nagpur Meera Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
High Profile Call Girls Nagpur Meera Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur EscortsHigh Profile Call Girls Nagpur Meera Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
High Profile Call Girls Nagpur Meera Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur EscortsCall Girls in Nagpur High Profile
 
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024hassan khalil
 
the ladakh protest in leh ladakh 2024 sonam wangchuk.pptx
the ladakh protest in leh ladakh 2024 sonam wangchuk.pptxthe ladakh protest in leh ladakh 2024 sonam wangchuk.pptx
the ladakh protest in leh ladakh 2024 sonam wangchuk.pptxhumanexperienceaaa
 
Introduction to IEEE STANDARDS and its different types.pptx
Introduction to IEEE STANDARDS and its different types.pptxIntroduction to IEEE STANDARDS and its different types.pptx
Introduction to IEEE STANDARDS and its different types.pptxupamatechverse
 
Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...
Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...
Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Extrusion Processes and Their Limitations
Extrusion Processes and Their LimitationsExtrusion Processes and Their Limitations
Extrusion Processes and Their Limitations120cr0395
 
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...Soham Mondal
 
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfidmain PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfidNikhilNagaraju
 
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...Dr.Costas Sachpazis
 
Call for Papers - African Journal of Biological Sciences, E-ISSN: 2663-2187, ...
Call for Papers - African Journal of Biological Sciences, E-ISSN: 2663-2187, ...Call for Papers - African Journal of Biological Sciences, E-ISSN: 2663-2187, ...
Call for Papers - African Journal of Biological Sciences, E-ISSN: 2663-2187, ...Christo Ananth
 
(ANJALI) Dange Chowk Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
(ANJALI) Dange Chowk Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...(ANJALI) Dange Chowk Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
(ANJALI) Dange Chowk Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...ranjana rawat
 
(ANVI) Koregaon Park Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
(ANVI) Koregaon Park Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...(ANVI) Koregaon Park Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
(ANVI) Koregaon Park Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...ranjana rawat
 
APPLICATIONS-AC/DC DRIVES-OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
APPLICATIONS-AC/DC DRIVES-OPERATING CHARACTERISTICSAPPLICATIONS-AC/DC DRIVES-OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
APPLICATIONS-AC/DC DRIVES-OPERATING CHARACTERISTICSKurinjimalarL3
 
Call Girls Service Nagpur Tanvi Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
Call Girls Service Nagpur Tanvi Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur EscortsCall Girls Service Nagpur Tanvi Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
Call Girls Service Nagpur Tanvi Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur EscortsCall Girls in Nagpur High Profile
 
VIP Call Girls Service Hitech City Hyderabad Call +91-8250192130
VIP Call Girls Service Hitech City Hyderabad Call +91-8250192130VIP Call Girls Service Hitech City Hyderabad Call +91-8250192130
VIP Call Girls Service Hitech City Hyderabad Call +91-8250192130Suhani Kapoor
 
Decoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptx
Decoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptxDecoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptx
Decoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptxJoão Esperancinha
 

Recently uploaded (20)

The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth 8250192130 Will You Miss Thi...
The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth 8250192130 Will You Miss Thi...The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth 8250192130 Will You Miss Thi...
The Most Attractive Pune Call Girls Budhwar Peth 8250192130 Will You Miss Thi...
 
College Call Girls Nashik Nehal 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Nashik
College Call Girls Nashik Nehal 7001305949 Independent Escort Service NashikCollege Call Girls Nashik Nehal 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Nashik
College Call Girls Nashik Nehal 7001305949 Independent Escort Service Nashik
 
High Profile Call Girls Nagpur Meera Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
High Profile Call Girls Nagpur Meera Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur EscortsHigh Profile Call Girls Nagpur Meera Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
High Profile Call Girls Nagpur Meera Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
 
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
Architect Hassan Khalil Portfolio for 2024
 
the ladakh protest in leh ladakh 2024 sonam wangchuk.pptx
the ladakh protest in leh ladakh 2024 sonam wangchuk.pptxthe ladakh protest in leh ladakh 2024 sonam wangchuk.pptx
the ladakh protest in leh ladakh 2024 sonam wangchuk.pptx
 
Roadmap to Membership of RICS - Pathways and Routes
Roadmap to Membership of RICS - Pathways and RoutesRoadmap to Membership of RICS - Pathways and Routes
Roadmap to Membership of RICS - Pathways and Routes
 
Introduction to IEEE STANDARDS and its different types.pptx
Introduction to IEEE STANDARDS and its different types.pptxIntroduction to IEEE STANDARDS and its different types.pptx
Introduction to IEEE STANDARDS and its different types.pptx
 
Call Us -/9953056974- Call Girls In Vikaspuri-/- Delhi NCR
Call Us -/9953056974- Call Girls In Vikaspuri-/- Delhi NCRCall Us -/9953056974- Call Girls In Vikaspuri-/- Delhi NCR
Call Us -/9953056974- Call Girls In Vikaspuri-/- Delhi NCR
 
Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...
Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...
Sheet Pile Wall Design and Construction: A Practical Guide for Civil Engineer...
 
Extrusion Processes and Their Limitations
Extrusion Processes and Their LimitationsExtrusion Processes and Their Limitations
Extrusion Processes and Their Limitations
 
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...
OSVC_Meta-Data based Simulation Automation to overcome Verification Challenge...
 
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfidmain PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
main PPT.pptx of girls hostel security using rfid
 
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...
Structural Analysis and Design of Foundations: A Comprehensive Handbook for S...
 
Call for Papers - African Journal of Biological Sciences, E-ISSN: 2663-2187, ...
Call for Papers - African Journal of Biological Sciences, E-ISSN: 2663-2187, ...Call for Papers - African Journal of Biological Sciences, E-ISSN: 2663-2187, ...
Call for Papers - African Journal of Biological Sciences, E-ISSN: 2663-2187, ...
 
(ANJALI) Dange Chowk Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
(ANJALI) Dange Chowk Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...(ANJALI) Dange Chowk Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
(ANJALI) Dange Chowk Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
 
(ANVI) Koregaon Park Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
(ANVI) Koregaon Park Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...(ANVI) Koregaon Park Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
(ANVI) Koregaon Park Call Girls Just Call 7001035870 [ Cash on Delivery ] Pun...
 
APPLICATIONS-AC/DC DRIVES-OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
APPLICATIONS-AC/DC DRIVES-OPERATING CHARACTERISTICSAPPLICATIONS-AC/DC DRIVES-OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
APPLICATIONS-AC/DC DRIVES-OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS
 
Call Girls Service Nagpur Tanvi Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
Call Girls Service Nagpur Tanvi Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur EscortsCall Girls Service Nagpur Tanvi Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
Call Girls Service Nagpur Tanvi Call 7001035870 Meet With Nagpur Escorts
 
VIP Call Girls Service Hitech City Hyderabad Call +91-8250192130
VIP Call Girls Service Hitech City Hyderabad Call +91-8250192130VIP Call Girls Service Hitech City Hyderabad Call +91-8250192130
VIP Call Girls Service Hitech City Hyderabad Call +91-8250192130
 
Decoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptx
Decoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptxDecoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptx
Decoding Kotlin - Your guide to solving the mysterious in Kotlin.pptx
 

D4762.7410 Testing Polymer Matrix Composite Materials.pdf

  • 1. Designation: D4762 − 11a Standard Guide for Testing Polymer Matrix Composite Materials1 This standard is issued under the fixed designation D4762; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval. 1. Scope 1.1 This guide summarizes the application of ASTM stan- dard test methods (and other supporting standards) to continuous-fiber reinforced polymer matrix composite materi- als. The most commonly used or most applicable ASTM standards are included, emphasizing use of standards of Com- mittee D30 on Composite Materials. 1.2 This guide does not cover all possible standards that could apply to polymer matrix composites and restricts discus- sion to the documented scope. Commonly used but non- standard industry extensions of test method scopes, such as application of static test methods to fatigue testing, are not discussed. A more complete summary of general composite testing standards, including non-ASTM test methods, is in- cluded in the Composite Materials Handbook (MIL-HDBK- 17).2 Additional specific recommendations for testing textile (fabric, braided) composites are contained in Guide D6856. 1.3 This guide does not specify a system of measurement; the systems specified within each of the referenced standards shall apply as appropriate. Note that the referenced standards of ASTM Committee D30 are either SI-only or combined-unit standards with SI units listed first. 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro- priate safety and health practices and determine the applica- bility of regulatory limitations prior to use. 2. Referenced Documents 2.1 ASTM Standards:3 2.1.1 Standards of Committee D30 on Composite Materials C271/C271M Test Method for Density of Sandwich Core Materials C272 Test Method for Water Absorption of Core Materials for Structural Sandwich Constructions C273/C273M Test Method for Shear Properties of Sandwich Core Materials C297/C297M Test Method for Flatwise Tensile Strength of Sandwich Constructions C363/C363M Test Method for Node Tensile Strength of Honeycomb Core Materials C364/C364M Test Method for Edgewise Compressive Strength of Sandwich Constructions C365/C365M Test Method for Flatwise Compressive Prop- erties of Sandwich Cores C366/C366M Test Methods for Measurement of Thickness of Sandwich Cores C393/C393M Test Method for Core Shear Properties of Sandwich Constructions by Beam Flexure C394 Test Method for Shear Fatigue of Sandwich Core Materials C480/C480M Test Method for Flexure Creep of Sandwich Constructions C481 Test Method for Laboratory Aging of Sandwich Con- structions C613/C613M Test Method for Constituent Content of Com- posite Prepreg by Soxhlet Extraction D2344/D2344M Test Method for Short-Beam Strength of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials and Their Laminates D3039/D3039M Test Method for Tensile Properties of Poly- mer Matrix Composite Materials D3171 Test Methods for Constituent Content of Composite Materials D3410/D3410M Test Method for Compressive Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials with Unsupported Gage Section by Shear Loading D3479/D3479M Test Method for Tension-Tension Fatigue of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials D3518/D3518M Test Method for In-Plane Shear Response of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials by Tensile Test of a 645° Laminate D3529/D3529M Test Method for Matrix Solids Content and Matrix Content of Composite Prepreg D3530/D3530M Test Method for Volatiles Content of Com- posite Material Prepreg 1 This guide is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D30 on Composite Materials and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D30.01 on Editorial and Resource Standards. Current edition approved Aug. 1, 2011. Published September 2011. Originally approved in 1988. Last previous edition approved in 2011 as D4762 – 11. DOI: 10.1520/D4762-11A. 2 Available from Standardization Documents Order Desk, DODSSP, Bldg. 4, Section D, 700 Robbins Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19111-5098, http:// dodssp.daps.dla.mil. 3 For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website. Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States 1
  • 2. D3531 Test Method for Resin Flow of Carbon Fiber-Epoxy Prepreg D3532 Test Method for Gel Time of Carbon Fiber-Epoxy Prepreg D3800 Test Method for Density of High-Modulus Fibers D3878 Terminology for Composite Materials D4018 Test Methods for Properties of Continuous Filament Carbon and Graphite Fiber Tows D4102 Test Method for Thermal Oxidative Resistance of Carbon Fibers D4255/D4255M Test Method for In-Plane Shear Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials by the Rail Shear Method D5229/D5229M Test Method for Moisture Absorption Prop- erties and Equilibrium Conditioning of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials D5379/D5379M Test Method for Shear Properties of Com- posite Materials by the V-Notched Beam Method D5448/D5448M Test Method for Inplane Shear Properties of Hoop Wound Polymer Matrix Composite Cylinders D5449/D5449M Test Method for Transverse Compressive Properties of Hoop Wound Polymer Matrix Composite Cylinders D5450/D5450M Test Method for Transverse Tensile Prop- erties of Hoop Wound Polymer Matrix Composite Cylin- ders D5467/D5467M Test Method for Compressive Properties of Unidirectional Polymer Matrix Composite Materials Us- ing a Sandwich Beam D5528 Test Method for Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Tough- ness of Unidirectional Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites D5687/D5687M Guide for Preparation of Flat Composite Panels with Processing Guidelines for Specimen Prepara- tion D5766/D5766M Test Method for Open-Hole Tensile Strength of Polymer Matrix Composite Laminates D5961/D5961M Test Method for Bearing Response of Poly- mer Matrix Composite Laminates D6115 Test Method for Mode I Fatigue Delamination Growth Onset of Unidirectional Fiber-Reinforced Poly- mer Matrix Composites D6264/D6264M Test Method for Measuring the Damage Resistance of a Fiber-Reinforced Polymer-Matrix Com- posite to a Concentrated Quasi-Static Indentation Force D6415/D6415M Test Method for Measuring the Curved Beam Strength of a Fiber-Reinforced Polymer-Matrix Composite D6416/D6416M Test Method for Two-Dimensional Flexural Properties of Simply Supported Sandwich Composite Plates Subjected to a Distributed Load D6484/D6484M Test Method for Open-Hole Compressive Strength of Polymer Matrix Composite Laminates D6507 Practice for Fiber Reinforcement Orientation Codes for Composite Materials D6641/D6641M Test Method for Compressive Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials Using a Combined Loading Compression (CLC) Test Fixture D6671/D6671M Test Method for Mixed Mode I-Mode II Interlaminar Fracture Toughness of Unidirectional Fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites D6742/D6742M Practice for Filled-Hole Tension and Com- pression Testing of Polymer Matrix Composite Laminates D6772 Test Method for Dimensional Stability of Sandwich Core Materials D6790 Test Method for Determining Poisson’s Ratio of Honeycomb Cores D6856 Guide for Testing Fabric-Reinforced “Textile” Com- posite Materials D6873/D6873M Practice for Bearing Fatigue Response of Polymer Matrix Composite Laminates D7028 Test Method for Glass Transition Temperature (DMA Tg) of Polymer Matrix Composites by Dynamic Mechani- cal Analysis (DMA) D7078/D7078M Test Method for Shear Properties of Com- posite Materials by V-Notched Rail Shear Method D7136/D7136M Test Method for Measuring the Damage Resistance of a Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Com- posite to a Drop-Weight Impact Event D7137/D7137M Test Method for Compressive Residual Strength Properties of Damaged Polymer Matrix Compos- ite Plates D7205/D7205M Test Method for Tensile Properties of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite Bars D7248/D7248M Test Method for Bearing/Bypass Interac- tion Response of Polymer Matrix Composite Laminates Using 2-Fastener Specimens D7249/D7249M Test Method for Facing Properties of Sand- wich Constructions by Long Beam Flexure D7250/D7250M Practice for Determining Sandwich Beam Flexural and Shear Stiffness D7264/D7264M Test Method for Flexural Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials D7291/D7291M Test Method for Through-Thickness “Flat- wise” Tensile Strength and Elastic Modulus of a Fiber- Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite Material D7332/D7332M Test Method for Measuring the Fastener Pull-Through Resistance of a Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite D7336/D7336M Test Method for Static Energy Absorption Properties of Honeycomb Sandwich Core Materials D7337/D7337M Test Method for Tensile Creep Rupture of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite Bars D7522/D7522M Test Method for Pull-Off Strength for FRP Laminate Systems Bonded to Concrete Substrate D7565/D7565M Test Method for Determining Tensile Prop- erties of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites Used for Strengthening of Civil Structures D7615/D7615M Practice for Open-Hole Fatigue Response of Polymer Matrix Composite Laminates D7616/D7616M Test Method for Determining Apparent Overlap Splice Shear Strength Properties of Wet Lay-Up Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites Used for Strengthening Civil Structures D7617/D7617M Test Method for Transverse Shear Strength of Fiber-reinforced Polymer Matrix Composite Bars D4762 − 11a 2
  • 3. E1309 Guide for Identification of Fiber-Reinforced Polymer-Matrix Composite Materials in Databases E1434 Guide for Recording Mechanical Test Data of Fiber- Reinforced Composite Materials in Databases E1471 Guide for Identification of Fibers, Fillers, and Core Materials in Computerized Material Property Databases F1645/F1645M Test Method for Water Migration in Honey- comb Core Materials 2.1.2 Standards of Committee D20 on Plastics C581 Practice for Determining Chemical Resistance of Thermosetting Resins Used in Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Structures Intended for Liquid Service D256 Test Methods for Determining the Izod Pendulum Impact Resistance of Plastics D543 Practices for Evaluating the Resistance of Plastics to Chemical Reagents D570 Test Method for Water Absorption of Plastics D618 Practice for Conditioning Plastics for Testing D638 Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics D648 Test Method for Deflection Temperature of Plastics Under Flexural Load in the Edgewise Position D671 Test Method for Flexural Fatigue of Plastics by Constant-Amplitude-of-Force (Withdrawn 2002)4 D695 Test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid Plastics D696 Test Method for Coefficient of Linear Thermal Expan- sion of Plastics Between −30°C and 30°C with a Vitreous Silica Dilatometer D790 Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materi- als D792 Test Methods for Density and Specific Gravity (Rela- tive Density) of Plastics by Displacement D953 Test Method for Bearing Strength of Plastics D1505 Test Method for Density of Plastics by the Density- Gradient Technique D1822 Test Method for Tensile-Impact Energy to Break Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials D2471 Practice for Gel Time and Peak Exothermic Tempera- ture of Reacting Thermosetting Resins (Withdrawn 2008)4 D2583 Test Method for Indentation Hardness of Rigid Plas- tics by Means of a Barcol Impressor D2584 Test Method for Ignition Loss of Cured Reinforced Resins D2734 Test Methods for Void Content of Reinforced Plastics D2990 Test Methods for Tensile, Compressive, and Flexural Creep and Creep-Rupture of Plastics D3418 Test Method for Transition Temperatures and En- thalpies of Fusion and Crystallization of Polymers by Differential Scanning Calorimetry D3846 Test Method for In-Plane Shear Strength of Rein- forced Plastics D4065 Practice for Plastics: Dynamic Mechanical Proper- ties: Determination and Report of Procedures D4473 Test Method for Plastics: Dynamic Mechanical Prop- erties: Cure Behavior D5083 Test Method for Tensile Properties of Reinforced Thermosetting Plastics Using Straight-Sided Specimens D6272 Test Method for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materi- als by Four-Point Bending 2.1.3 Standards of Other ASTM Committees E228 Test Method for Linear Thermal Expansion of Solid Materials With a Push-Rod Dilatometer E289 Test Method for Linear Thermal Expansion of Rigid Solids with Interferometry E1269 Test Method for Determining Specific Heat Capacity by Differential Scanning Calorimetry E1461 Test Method for Thermal Diffusivity by the Flash Method E1922 Test Method for Translaminar Fracture Toughness of Laminated and Pultruded Polymer Matrix Composite Materials 3. Terminology 3.1 Definitions related to composite materials are defined in Terminology D3878. 3.2 Symbology for specifying the orientation and stacking sequence of a composite laminate is defined in Practice D6507. 3.3 For purposes of this document, “low modulus” compos- ites are defined as being reinforced with fibers having a modulus ≤20 GPa (≤3.0 × 106 psi), while “high-modulus” composites are reinforced with fiber having a modulus >20 GPa (>3.0 × 106 psi). 4. Significance and Use 4.1 This guide is intended to aid in the selection of standards for polymer matrix composite materials. It specifically sum- marizes the application of standards from ASTM Committee D30 on Composite Materials that apply to continuous-fiber reinforced polymer matrix composite materials. For reference and comparison, many commonly used or applicable ASTM standards from other ASTM Committees are also included. 5. Standard Specimen Preparation 5.1 Preparation of polymer matrix composite test specimens is described in Guide D5687/D5687M. 6. Standard Test Methods 6.1 ASTM test methods for the evaluation of polymer matrix composites are summarized in the tables. Advantages, disadvantages, and other comments for each test method are included where appropriate. Where possible, a single preferred test method is identified. TEST METHOD CATEGORY TABLE Lamina/Laminate Static Properties Table 1 Lamina/Laminate Dynamic Properties Table 2 Laminate/Structural Response Table 3 Sandwich Constructions Table 4 Constituent/Precursor/Thermophysical Properties Table 5 Environmental Conditioning/Resistance Table 6 4 The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced on www.astm.org. D4762 − 11a 3
  • 4. TABLE 1 Lamina/Laminate Static Test Methods Test Method Specimen Measured Property Description and Advantages Disadvantages Comments In-Plane Tensile Test Methods D3039/D3039M Tensile Strength Straight sided speci- men. Suitable for both random, discontinuous and continuous-fiber composites. Tabbed and untabbed configu- rations available. Tabbed configurations require careful adhe- sive selection and special specimen preparation. Certain laminate layups prone to edge delamination which can affect tensile strength results. Preferred for most uses. Provides additional configurations, requirements, and guidance that are not found in D5083. Limited to laminates that are balanced and symmetric with respect to the test direction. Tensile Modulus, Poisson’s Ratio, Stress-Strain Re- sponse Requires use of strain or displacement trans- ducers. Modulus measure- ments do not require use of tabs. Modulus measurements typi- cally robust. D638 Tensile Strength, Tensile Modulus “Dumbbell” shaped specimen. Ease of test specimen preparation. Stress concentration at the radii. Unsuitable for highly oriented fiber com- posites. Not recommended for high- modulus composites. Technically equivalent to ISO 527-1. D5083 Tensile Strength, Tensile Modulus Straight-sided, unt- abbed specimen only. Suitable for plastics and low-modulus composites. A straight-sided alternative to D638. Technically equivalent to ISO 527-4 except as noted below: (a) This test method does not include testing of the Type I dog-bone shaped specimen described in ISO 527-4. Testing of this type of specimen, pri- marily used for reinforced and unreinforced thermoplastic materials, is described in D638. (b) The thickness of test speci- mens in this test method in- cludes the 2 mm to 10 mm thickness range of ISO 527-4, but expands the allowable test thickness to 14 mm. D5450/D5450M Transverse (90°) Ten- sile Strength Hoop wound cylinder with all 90° (hoop) plies loaded in axial tension. Develops data for specialized process/ form. Limited to hoop- wound cylinders. Limited to transverse tensile properties. Must bond specimen to fixture. Must ensure adequate bonding to fixture. In-Plane Compression Test Methods D6641/D6641M Compressive Strength Untabbed, or tabbed straight-sided speci- men loaded via a combination of shear and end-loading. Smaller lighter, less expensive fixture than that of D3410/ D3410M. Better also at non- ambient environments. Suitable for continu- ous fiber composites. Tabbed specimens are required for deter- mining compressive strength of laminates containing more than 50% 0° plies. Preferred method. Thickness must be sufficient to prevent column buckling. Limited to laminates that are balanced and symmetric and contain at least one 0° ply. For strength determination, unt- abbed specimens are limited to a maximum of 50 % 0° plies, or equivalent. Compressive Modulus, Poisson’s Ratio, Stress-Strain Re- sponse Requires use of strain or displacement trans- ducers. Unidirectional tape or tow com- posites can be tested using unt- abbed specimens to determine unidirectional modulus and Poisson’s ratio. D4762 − 11a 4
  • 5. TABLE 1 Continued Test Method Specimen Measured Property Description and Advantages Disadvantages Comments D695 Compressive Strength, Compressive Modulus “Dogbone” shaped specimen with loading applied at the ends via a platen. Tabs are optional. Failure mode is often end-crushing. Stress concentrations at radii. Specimen must be dog boned and ends must be accurately machined. No assessment of alignment. Not recommended for highly oriented or continuous fiber composites. Modified version of D695 re- leased as SACMA SRM 1 test method is widely used in aero- space industry, but ASTM D30 and MIL-HDBK-17 prefer use of D6641/D6641M method. D3410/D3410M Compressive Strength Straight sided speci- men with load applied by shear via fixture grips. Suitable for random, discontinuous and continuous fiber com- posites. Tabbed and untabbed configurations avail- able. Strain gages required to verify alignment. Poor for non-ambient testing due to mas- sive fixture. Expensive and heavy/bulky fix- turing. Thickness must be sufficient to prevent column buckling. Compressive Modulus, Poisson’s Ratio, Stress-Strain Re- sponse Requires use of strain or displacement trans- ducers. D5467/D5467M Compressive Strength, Compressive Modulus, Stress- Strain Response Sandwich beam speci- men loaded in 4-point bending. Intended result is a compression failure mode of the facesheet. Data is especially ap- plicable to sandwich structures. Fixturing is simple compared to other compression tests. An expensive speci- men that is not rec- ommended unless the structure warrants its use. Strain gages required to obtain modulus and strain-to-failure data. Narrow (1 in. wide) specimen may not be suitable for materials with coarse features, such as fabrics with large filament count tows (12K or more) or certain braided mate- rials. Must take care to avoid core failure modes. Limited to high-modulus com- posites. Due to the nature of the speci- men construction and applied flexural loading these results may not be equivalent to a similar laminate tested by other compression methods such as D3410/D3410M or D6641/ D6641M. D5449/D5449M Transverse (90°) Compressive Strength Hoop-wound cylinder with all 90° (hoop) plies loaded in com- pression. Develops data for specialized process/ form. Limited to hoop- wound cylinders. Limited to transverse compressive proper- ties. Must bond specimen to fixture. Must ensure adequate bonding to fixture. In-Plane Shear Test Methods D3518/D3518M Shear Modulus, Stress-Strain Response, Maximum Shear Stress Tensile test of [+45/-45]ns layup. Simple test specimen and test method. Poor specimen for measuring ultimate shear strength due to large non-linear re- sponse. Limited to material forms/processes that can be made in flat ±45° form. Biaxial transducers required to obtain modulus and strain- to-failure data. Maximum shear stress determination is dependent upon instrumentation-based strain measurements at high shear strain magnitudes. Widely used due to its low cost and simplicity. Specimen gage section is not under pure shear stress, and stress fields local to free edges are complex. D4762 − 11a 5
  • 6. TABLE 1 Continued Test Method Specimen Measured Property Description and Advantages Disadvantages Comments D5379/D5379M Shear Strength, Shear Modulus, Stress-Strain Re- sponse V-notched specimen loaded in special bending fixture. Along with D7078/ D7078M, provides the best shear response of the standardized methods. Provides shear modu- lus and strength. Can be used to test most composite types. Produces a relatively pure and uniform shear stress state. May be necessary to tab the specimen. Specimen can be dif- ficult to machine. Biaxial strain gages required to obtain modulus and strain- to-failure data. Requires good strain- gage installation tech- nique. In-plane tests not suitable for materials with coarse features, such as fabrics with large filament count tows (12K or more) or certain braided mate- rials. Unacceptable failure modes, especially with high-strength laminates, can occur due to localized fail- ure of the specimen at the loading points. Recommended for quantitative data, or where shear modulus or stress/strain data are re- quired. Enables correlation with out-of-plane properties. Must monitor strain data for specimen buckling. Limited to the following forms: (a ) unidirectional tape or tow laminates with fibers parallel or perpendicular to loading axis. (b) woven fabric laminates with the warp direction parallel or perpendicular to loading axis. (c) laminates with equal num- bers of 0° and 90° plies with the 0° plies parallel or perpen- dicular to loading axis. (d) short-fiber composites with majority of the fibers randomly distributed. The most accurate modulus measurements obtained from laminates of the [0/90] family. D4255/D4255M Shear Strength, Shear Modulus, Stress-Strain Re- sponse Rail shear methods. Suitable for both ran- dom and continuous fiber composites. Difficult test to run. Historically has had poor reproducibility. Stress concentrations at gripping areas. Strain gages required to obtain modulus and strain-to-failure data. Expensive specimen. Best reserved for testing of laminates. D5448/D5448M Shear Strength, Shear Modulus, Stress-Strain Re- sponse Hoop-wound cylinder with all 90° (hoop) plies loaded in torsion. Develops data for specialized process/ form. Limited to hoop- wound cylinders. Limited to in-plane shear properties. Must bond specimen to fixture. Must ensure adequate bonding to fixture. D7078/D7078M Shear Strength, Shear Modulus, Stress-Strain Re- sponse V-notched specimen loaded in rail shear fixture. Along with D5379/ D5379M, provides the best shear response of the standardized methods. Provides shear modu- lus and strength. Can be used to test most composite types. Produces a relatively pure and uniform shear stress state. Generally does not require tabs. Permits testing of fab- ric and textile compos- ites with large unit cells. Less susceptible to loading point failures than D5379/D5379M. Specimen can be dif- ficult to machine. Biaxial strain gages required to obtain modulus and strain- to-failure data. Requires good strain- gage installation tech- nique. Recommended for quantitative data, or where shear modulus or stress/strain data are re- quired. Enables correlation with out-of- plane properties. Must monitor strain data for specimen buckling. Material form limitations are equivalent to those for D5379/ D5379M. The most accurate modulus measurements ob- tained from laminates of the [0/90} family. Out-of-Plane Tensile Test Methods D4762 − 11a 6
  • 7. TABLE 1 Continued Test Method Specimen Measured Property Description and Advantages Disadvantages Comments D6415/D6415M Curved Laminate Strength Right-angle curved laminate specimen loaded in 4-point bending. Suitable for continu- ous fiber composites. A complex stress state is generated in the specimen that may cause an unin- tended complex fail- ure mode. There is typically a large amount of scat- ter in the curved beam strength data. While the failure mode is largely out- of-plane, the result is generally considered a structural test of a curved beam rather than a material prop- erty. Limited to composites with de- fined layers (no through-the- thickness reinforcement). For structural comparison, the same manufacturing process should be used for both the test specimen and the structure. Non-standard versions of the curved-beam test yield a differ- ent stress state that may affect the strength and failure mode. Interlaminar Tensile Strength See above. See above. Tests for interlaminar tensile strength limited to unidirectional materials with fibers oriented continuously along the legs and around the bend. D7291/D7291M Flatwise Tensile Strength, Flatwise Modulus Cylindrical or reduced gage section “spool” specimen loaded in tension. Uses adhesively bonded thick metal end-tabs for load in- troduction. Suitable for continu- ous or discontinuous fiber composites. Subjects a relatively large volume of mate- rial to an almost uni- form stress field. Results are sensitive to system alignment and load eccentricity. Surface finish and parallelism affect strength results. Results are sensitive to thermal residual stresses, adhesive, and surface prepara- tion at end-tab bond- lines. Requires bonding and machin- ing of laminate and end-tabs. End-tabs may be reused within geometric limits. Low crosshead displacement rate (0.1 mm/mim [0.005 in. /min]. Valid tests require failures away from the end-tab bondline. Out-of-Plane Shear Test Methods D2344/D2344M Short Beam Strength Short rectangular beam specimen loaded in 3-point bending. Short Beam Strength is a good indicator of resin-dominated prop- erties. Simple, inexpensive specimen and test configuration. Short Beam Strength may be related to in- terlaminar shear strength, but the stress state is quite mixed, and so results are not recommended as an assessment of shear strength due to stress concentrations and high secondary stresses at loading points. Shear modulus can- not be measured. Intended primarily for quality control, comparative data, and assessment of environmental effects. D5379/D5379M Interlaminar Shear Strength, Interlaminar Shear Modulus V-notched specimen loaded in special bending fixture. Along with D7078/ D7078M, provides the best shear response of the standardized methods. Provides shear modu- lus and strength. Can be used to test most composites. Produces a relatively pure and uniform shear stress state. May be necessary to tab the specimen. Specimen can be dif- ficult to machine. Strain gages required to obtain modulus and strain-to-failure data. Requires good strain- gage installation tech- nique. Requires a very thick laminate, 20 mm (0.75 in.) for out-of- plane properties. Recommended for quantitative data, or where shear modulus or stress/strain data are re- quired. Enables correlation with in- plane properties. Must monitor strain data for specimen buckling. D4762 − 11a 7
  • 8. 7. Standard Data Reporting 7.1 Constituent Material Description—Data reporting of the description of composite material constituents is documented in Guide E1471. 7.2 Composite Material Description—Data reporting of the description of composite materials is documented in Guide E1309. TABLE 1 Continued Test Method Specimen Measured Property Description and Advantages Disadvantages Comments D3846 Shear Strength Specimen with two machined notches loaded in compres- sion. Suitable for randomly dispersed and con- tinuous fiber rein- forced materials. May be preferable to D2344/D2344M for materials with ran- domly dispersed fiber orientations. Failures may be sen- sitive to accuracy of notch machining. Stress concentrations at notches. Failure may be influ- enced by the applied compression stress. Requires post-failure measurement of shear area. Shear modulus cannot be measured. Specimen loaded in compres- sion utilizing the D695 loading/ stabilizing jig. Shear loading occurs in a plane between two machined notches. Often a problematic test. Note that this is an out-of- plane shear test (using recog- nized terminology), despite the title that indicates in-plane shear loading. D7078/D7078M Interlaminar Shear Strength, Interlaminar Shear Modulus V-notched specimen loaded in rail shear fixture. Along with D5379/D5379M, pro- vides the best shear response of the stan- dardized methods. Provides shear modu- lus and strength. Can be used to test most composites. Produces a relatively pure and uniform shear stress state. Less susceptible to loading point failures than D5379/D5379M. Specimen can be dif- ficult to machine. Strain gages required to obtain modulus and strain-to-failure data. Requires good strain- gage installation tech- nique. Requires an ex- tremely thick laminate, typically consisting of multiple co-bonded sub- laminates, for out-of- plane properties. Recommended for quantitative data, or where shear modulus or stress/strain data are re- quired. Enables correlation with in- plane properties. Must monitor strain data for specimen buck- ling. Laminate Flexural Test Methods D790 Flexural Strength, Flexural Modulus, Flexural Stress-Strain Response Flat rectangular speci- men loaded in 3-point bending. Suitable for randomly dispersed and con- tinuous fiber rein- forced materials. Ease of test specimen preparation and test- ing. Stress concentrations and secondary stresses at loading points. Results sensitive to specimen and loading geometry, strain rate. Failure mode may be tension, compression, shear, or combi- nation. D6272 Flexural Strength, Flexural Modulus, Flexural Stress-Strain Response Flat rectangular speci- men loaded in 4-point bending. Suitable for randomly dispersed and con- tinuous fiber rein- forced materials. Ease of test specim en preparation and testing. Choice of two proce- dures enable adjust- able tension/ compression/ shear load distribution. Center-point deflec- tion requires second- ary instrumentation. Results sensitive to specimen and loading geometry, strain rate. Span-to-depth ratio must increase for laminates with high tensile strength with respect to in-plane shear strength. The quarter-span version is rec- ommended for highmodulus composites. Failure mode may be tension, compression, shear, or combi- nation. D4762 − 11a 8
  • 9. TABLE 1 Continued Test Method Specimen Measured Property Description and Advantages Disadvantages Comments D6416/D6416M Pressure-Deflection Response, Pressure-Strain Response, Plate Bending and Shear Stiffness Two-dimensional plate flexure induced by a well-defined distrib- uted load. Apparatus, instrumen- tation ensure applied pressure distribution is known. Failures typically initi- ate away from edges. Specimens are rela- tively large, facilitating study of manufactur- ing defects and pro- cess variables. For studies of failure mechanics and other quantitative sandwich analyses, only small panel deflections are allowed. The test fixture is necessarily more elaborate, and some calibration is required to verify simply- supported boundary conditions. Results highly depen- dent upon panel edge boundary conditions and pressure distribu- tion. Relatively large speci- men and support fix- ture geometry. The same caveats applying to D7249/D7249M could apply to D6416/D6416M. However, this method is not limited to sandwich composites; D6416/D6416M can be used to evaluate the 2-dimensional flex- ural properties of any square plate. Distributed load is provided us- ing a water-filled bladder. Ratio of support span to aver- age specimen thickness should be between 10 to 30. D7264/D7264M Flexural Strength, Flexural Modulus, Flexural Stress-Strain Response Recommended for high-modulus compos- ites. Flat rectangular speci- men loaded in 3 or 4-point bending. Suitable for randomly dispersed and con- tinuous fiber rein- forced materials. Ease of test specimen preparation and test- ing. Standardized load and support spans to sim- plify calculations and to standardize geom- etry. Center-point deflec- tion measurement requires secondary instrumentation. Results sensitive to specimen and loading geometry, strain rate. Span-to-depth ratio may need to increase for laminates with high tensile strength with respect to in- plane shear strength. Standard support span-to- thickness ratio is 32:1. For 4-point load, load points are set at one-half of the support span. Failure mode may be tension, compression, shear, or combi- nation. Fracture Toughness Test Methods D5528 Mode I Interlaminar Fracture Toughness, GIc Flat rectangular speci- men with delamination insert loaded in ten- sion. Suitable for unidirec- tional tape or tow laminates. Relatively stable de- lamination growth. Specimens must be hinged at the loading points. Crack growth not al- ways well behaved. Calculations assume linear elastic behavior. Crack growth should be ob- served from both sides of the specimen. D6671/D6671M Mixed Mode I/II Inter- laminar Fracture Toughness, Gc Flat rectangular speci- men with delamination insert loaded in bend- ing. Suitable for unidirec- tional tape or tow laminates. Tests at most mode mixtures. Constant mode mix- tures with crack growth. Can obtain initiation and propagation toughness values. Specimens must be hinged at the loading points. Crack growth not always well be- haved. Complicated loading apparatus. Good alignment is critical. Calculations assume linear elastic behavior. E1922 Translaminar Fracture Toughness, KTL Flat rectangular speci- men containing an edge notch loaded in tension. Simple test to per- form. Results are only valid for the particular lami- nate tested. Laminates producing large damage zones do not give valid val- ues. D4762 − 11a 9
  • 10. 7.3 Composite Material Test Data—Data reporting of me- chanical test data results for composite materials is docu- mented in Guide E1434. 8. Keywords 8.1 bearing strength; bearing-bypass interaction; coefficient of thermal expansion; composite materials; composites; com- pression; compressive strength; constituent content; crack- growth testing; creep; creep strength; CTE; curved-beam strength; damage; damage resistance; damage tolerance; data recording; data records; delamination; density; drop-weight impact; elastic modulus; fastener pull-through; fatigue; fiber; fiber volume; filament; filled-hole compression strength; filled- hole tensile strength; flatwise tensile strength; flexural modu- lus; flexure; fracture; fracture toughness; gel time; glass transition temperature; hoop-wound; impact; impact strength; TABLE 2 Lamina/Laminate Dynamic Test Methods Test Method Specimen Measured Property Description and Advantages Disadvantages Comments In-Plane Tension/Tension Fatigue Test Methods D3479/D3479M Tension-Tension Stress- Cycles (S-N) Data Uses D3039/D3039M ten- sile test specimen, with axial tension-tension cy- clic loading. Suitable for both random and continuous-fiber com- posites. Stress concentrations at the end tabs. End tab machining and bonding required. Careful specimen prepa- ration is critical. Appropriate specimen ge- ometry may vary from material to material. User should be prepared to do preliminary fatigue tests to optimize tab con- figurations and materials. In-Plane Flexural Fatigue Test Methods D671 Flexural Stress-Cycles (S-N) Data Constant-force cantilever specimen. Inexpensive high cycle fatigue (HCF) method. Stress concentrations at notches. Results sensitive to speci- men thickness. Not suitable for continuous-fiber compos- ites. This test method should not be used for continuous-fiber compos- ites. Flexural tests are typically considered structural tests, not material prop- erty tests. Fatigue Crack-Growth/Toughness Test Methods D6115 Mode I Fatigue Delamina- tion Initiation; Toughness- Cycles (G-N) Data Uses D5528 DCB specimen, with cyclic loading. Produces threshold fa- tigue data (GImax versus N). Does not produce da/dN data. The limitations and com- ments for D5528 also ap- ply. Tensile Creep Test Methods D2990 Tensile Strain versus Time Uses D638 tensile specimen, with long- duration loading. Ease of test specimen preparation. Stress concentrations at specimen radii. Not suitable for continu- ous fiber composites; in- stead use D3039/D3039M type specimen. Flexural Creep Test Methods D2990 Flexural Deflection versus Time Uses D790 flexure specimen, with long- duration loading. Includes both 3 and 4-point bending test set- ups. Simple to set up and run. Continuous-fiber flexural material response is complex, making results hard to interpret or gener- alize. Results sensitive to speci- men and loading geom- etry. Failure mode may vary. Not widely used in ad- vanced composites indus- try. Tensile Impact Test Methods D1822 Tensile Impact Energy of Rupture Relatively inexpensive test machine. Stress concentrations at the radii. Very small test speci- mens. Not instrumented. Not suitable for continu- ous fiber composites. Flexural Impact Test Methods D256 Impact Energy of Rupture Notched specimen. Flexibility in testing meth- ods. Not instrumented. Varying failure modes. Sensitive to test specimen geometry variations. This test provides a struc- tural impact property, not a material impact property. D4762 − 11a 10
  • 11. lamina; laminate; matrix content; mixed mode; mode I; mode II; mode III; modulus of elasticity; moisture content; moisture diffusivity; OHC; OHT; open-hole compressive strength; open- hole tensile strength; out-of-plane compressive strength; out- of-plane shear strength; out-of-plane tensile strength; panel; plate; Poisson’s ratio; polymer matrix composites; prepreg; reinforcement; reinforcement content; reinforcement volume; resin; resin content; sandwich construction; shear; shear modu- lus; shear strength; short-beam strength; specific heat; strain energy release rate; strength; structure; tensile strength; ten- sion; thermal conductivity; thermal diffusivity; thermal expan- sion coefficient; tow; V-notched beam strength; void content; winding; yarn TABLE 3 Laminate/Structural Test Methods Test Method Specimen Measured Property Description and Advantages Disadvantages Comments Notched Laminate Tension Test Methods D5766/D5766M Open Hole Tensile Strength Straight-sided, untabbed, open hole configuration. Procedure nearly equiva- lent to D3039/D3039M. Limited to multi-directional laminates with balanced and symmetric stacking sequences. Provides require- ments and guid- ance on specimen configuration and failure modes. D6742/D6742M Filled Hole Tensile Strength Straight-sided, untabbed, filled hole configuration. Procedure and specimen nearly equivalent to D3039/D3039M, D5766/ D5766M. Same as D5766/D5766M. Same as D5766/ D5766M. Also provides guid- ance on hole tolerances, fastener torque/preload. Notched Laminate Compression Test Methods D6484/D6484M Open Hole Compressive Strength Straight-sided, untabbed, open hole configuration. Fixture can be loaded us- ing either hydraulic grips or end platens. Limited to multi-directional laminates with balanced and symmetric stacking sequences. Provides require- ments and guid- ance on specimen configuration and failure modes. D6742/D6742M Filled Hole Compressive Strength Straight-sided, untabbed, filled hole configuration. Procedure, specimen and apparatus nearly equiva- lent to D6484/D6484M. Same as D6484/D6484M. Same as D6484/ D6484M. Also provides guid- ance on hole tolerances, fastener torque/preload. Notched Laminate Fatigue Test Methods D7615/D7615M Open Hole Stress- Cycles (S-N) Data Specimen and apparatus equivalent to D5766/ D5766M Configuration A for tension-tension fatigue loading and to D6484/ D6484M Procedure A for tension-compression and compression-compression fatigue loading. Same as D5766/D5766M and D6484/D6484M. Specimen stiffness moni- tored using an extensometer, which must be removed during fatigue cycling. Same as D5766/ D5766M and D6484/D6484M. Also provides guid- ance on fatigue loading ratio effects Bolted Joint Test Methods D953 Static Pin Bearing Strength One fastener, double shear pin bearing speci- men. Two methods available: tensile and compressive pin bearing. Monitors global load ver- sus deformation behavior. Focus is plastics. Does not account for vari- ous fastener geometries, torque/preload levels. Deformation local to hole is not measured. Some specimen geometric proper- ties (for example, width/diameter ra- tio) vary from D5961/D5961M guidelines. Not recommended for continuous fiber composites. D5961/D5961M Static Bearing Strength One and two fastener double and single shear bearing specimens loaded in tension or compression. Multiple specimen con- figurations provided to assess a variety of struc- tural joint configurations. Procedures provided to monitor inelastic deforma- tion behavior at hole. Limited to multi-directional laminates with balanced and symmetric stacking sequences. Response highly dependent upon specimen configuration and fastener torque/ preload. Limited to bearing failure modes only. Some details of specimen configura- tions are not suitable for determining bypass failure strengths. Provides require- ments and guid- ance on specimen configuration, type of loading, hole tolerances, fastener torque/preload and failure modes. D4762 − 11a 11
  • 12. TABLE 3 Continued Test Method Specimen Measured Property Description and Advantages Disadvantages Comments D6873/D6873M Bearing Stress-Cycles (S-N) Data Specimen and apparatus equivalent to D5961/ D5961M, with cyclic load- ing procedures provided to monitor hole elongation for a variety of joint con- figurations and fatigue loading conditions. Same as D5961/D5961M. Certain tests may require fastener removal or a variant quasi-static load- ing ratio to monitor hole elongation. Same as D5961/ D5961M. Also pro- vides guidance on fatigue loading ratio effects. Currently limited to D5961/ D5961M Procedure A and B specimen configurations. D7248/D7248M Bearing-Bypass Interac- tion One and two fastener double and single shear specimens loaded in ten- sion or compression. Multiple specimen con- figurations provided to assess a variety of joint configurations and fas- tener force proportions, optimized to promote bypass-dominated failure modes. Limited to multidirectional laminates with balanced and symmetric stacking sequences. Response highly depen- dent upon specimen con- figuration and fastener torque/preload. Limited to bypass failure modes only. Procedure C requires doubler plate calibration to extract fastener force proportion values. Provides require- ments and guid- ance on specimen configuration, type of loading, hole tolerances, fastener torque/preload, fail- ure modes, and fastener force pro- portion measure- ment. D7332/D7332M Fastener Pull-Through Resistance Two specimen configurations, Procedure A (compression-loaded fixture) for fastener screening, Procedure B (tension-loaded fixture) for composite joint configura- tion assessments. Limited to multidirectional laminates with balanced and symmetric stacking sequences. Response highly dependent upon specimen configuration and fastener characteris- tics. Provides require- ments and guid- ance on specimen configuration, hole tolerances, fastener characteristics, fail- ure modes, and force-displacement response character- ization. Static Indentation and Impact Damage Resistance Test Methods D2583 Indentation Hardness Provides a relative mea- sure of hardness based upon load versus indenta- tion depth response. Barcol impressor is portable, and load is ap- plied by hand. Focus is plastics and low- modulus composites. Does not record force ver- sus indentation depth re- sponse. Does not evaluate result- ing damage state. Uses flat-tipped indenter. D6264/D6264M Static Indentation Dam- age Resistance (Force- Indenter Displacement Response, Dent Depth, Damage Characteristics) Flat rectangular laminated plate subject to a static point loading. Permits damage resis- tance testing of simply- supported and rigidly backed plate specimens. Uses a conventional test- ing machine. Contact force and in- denter displacement data are obtained. Limited to continuous fiber composites without through-the-thickness re- inforcement. Test method does not ad- dress dynamic indentation effects. Narrow range of permis- sible specimen thick- nesses. Uses 12.7 mm (0.50 in.) diameter hemispherical in- denter. Often used to ap- proximate the dam- age state caused by a dynamic im- pact. Multi-directional fiber laminates with balanced and sym- metric stacking se- quences are usu- ally used. The damage re- sponse is a func- tion of the indentor geometry, support conditions and specimen configu- ration. D4762 − 11a 12
  • 13. TABLE 3 Continued Test Method Specimen Measured Property Description and Advantages Disadvantages Comments D7136/D7136M Drop-Weight Impact Dam- age Resistance (Indenter Contact Force and Velocity versus Time, Dent Depth, Damage Characteristics) Flat rectangular laminated plate subject to a dynamic dropweight point loading. Permits damage resis- tance testing of simply- supported plate speci- mens. Uses a dedicated drop- weight device, preferably with velocity detection equipment. Limited to continuous fiber composites without through-the-thickness re- inforcement. Results are very sensitive to impactor mass, diameter, drop height, and other parameters. Narrow range of permis- sible specimen thick- nesses. Uses 16 mm (0.625 in.) diameter hemi- spherical indenter. Multi-directional fiber laminates with balanced and sym- metric stacking se- quences are usu- ally used. The damage re- sponse is a func- tion of the impactor mass and geometry, drop height, support con- ditions and speci- men configuration. Static Indentation and Impact Damage Tolerance Test Methods D7137/D7137M Compression Residual Strength and Deformation Flat rectangular laminated plate, previously damaged through static indentation or dropweight impact, subjected to static com- pressive loading with a picture-frame test fixture. Limited to continuous fiber composites without through-the-thickness re- inforcement. Results are very sensitive to pre-existent damage state, edge-restraint conditions, and other pa- rameters. Narrow range of permis- sible specimen thick- nesses. Multi-directional fiber laminates with balanced and sym- metric stacking se- quences are usu- ally used. Initial damage di- ameter is limited to half the specimen width. Results are specific to the test configu- ration and damage state evaluated. Trans-laminar Fracture Test Methods E1922 Translaminar Fracture Toughness, KTL Flat rectangular specimen containing an edge notch loaded in tension. Simple test to perform Results only valid for the particular laminate tested; laminates producing large damage zones do not give valid values Reinforcement Bar Test Methods D7205/D7205M Composite Bar Tensile Strength Bar typically bonded with anchors to avoid grip end failures. Nominal cross-sectional area is determined volumetrically, is an aver- age value. Specific to tensile elements used in reinforced, prestressed, or post-tensioned con- crete. D7337/D7337M Composite Bar Tensile Creep Rupture Same specimen as D7205/D7205M, sub- jected to a constant sus- tained tensile force. Same as D7205/D7205M. Spare specimens must be tested to attain minimum specimen counts in case invalid failures occur. A minimum of four force ratios are re- quired to calculate the one-million hour creep rupture ca- pacity. D7617/D7617M Composite Bar Transverse Shear Strength Bar loaded under trans- verse shear using a double shear cutting blade test fixture. Used to establish shear strength of bars acting in dowel action across cracks or boundaries in concrete. Range of bar diameters accommodated by fixture is limited. Blade dimen- sions must closely match bar outer diameter. Shims required for close running fit of blades. Test fixture accom- modates bars with smooth and tex- tured surfaces. Test Methods for Fiber Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Matrix Composites Used to Strengthen Civil Structures D7565/D7565M Tensile Properties (Force/Width, Stiffness) Provides procedures for preparing and testing FRP compos- ites. References D3039/ D3039M for specimen testing. Calculations are based upon force per unit width due to high potential variation in FRP laminate thick- ness. Covers testing of both wet-layup and preimpregnated FRP composites. D4762 − 11a 13
  • 14. TABLE 3 Continued Test Method Specimen Measured Property Description and Advantages Disadvantages Comments D7616/D7616M Apparent Overlap Splice Shear Strength Measures strength of a wet-layup overlap splice joint under far-field tensile loading. References D3039/D3039M for speci- men testing. Primarily used to define minimum overlap splice length re- quirements for wet layup reinforcements. Results are valid exclu- sively for the overlap splice joint geometry ex- plicitly tested. Does not provide a reliable mea- sure of the bond lap shear strength for design analysis. Strength can be affected by kinked splice joint fibers and associated loading eccentricity. Provides detailed specimen prepara- tion procedures and guidance for failure mode characteriza- tion. D7522/D7522M Pull-Off Bond Strength Adhesion test device is attached to a circular sample of FRP bonded to a concrete substrate. Ten- sile force is applied nor- mal to the plane of the FRP-concrete bond. Used in both laboratory and field applications to con- trol quality of FRP and adhesives. Results are sensitive to system alignment, load eccentricity, and specimen uniformity. Multiple failure modes may be ob- served at multiple locations (FRP, ad- hesive or concrete substrate, or combi- nations thereof). FRP and concrete must be scored to define test section. D4762 − 11a 14
  • 15. TABLE 4 Sandwich Construction Test Methods Test Method Specimen Measured Property Description and Advantages Disadvantages Comments In-Plane Compression Test Methods C364/C364M Sandwich Compressive Strength Untabbed, straight-sided sandwich specimen which is end-loaded. Uses simple lateral end sup- ports for load introduction. Test is sensitive to unin- tended loading eccentricities. Requires that specimens be bonded into lateral end sup- ports. Testing of specimens with thin facings may require pot- ting or tabs to resist end- crushing. Multiple failure modes may be observed. Acceptable failure modes in- clude facesheet buckling, facesheet compression, facesheet dimpling, core compression and core shear. Out-of-Plane Tensile Test Methods C297/C297M Sandwich or Core Flat- wise Tensile Strength Square or cylindrical gage section sandwich or core specimen loaded in through- thickness tension. Uses adhesively bonded thick metal blocks for load intro- duction. Results are sensitive to sys- tem alignment and load ec- centricity. Results are sensitive to adhe- sive and surface preparation at loading block bondlines. Valid tests require failures away from the loading block bondline. Used to assess and compare core and core-to-facing through-thickness tensile strengths. Out-of-Plane Compressive Test Methods C365/C365M Core Flatwise Compressive Strength, Core Flatwise Compressive Modulus Square or cylindrical gage section sandwich core speci- men loaded in through- thickness compression. No test-specific fixtures are required. Results are sensitive to sys- tem alignment, load eccentricity, and thickness variation which can cause local crushing. Core edges may need to be stabilized using resin or fac- ings to avoid local crushing. Strength results must be re- ported as stabilized or non- stabilized. Standard aerospace practice uses stabilized specimens for modulus determination. D7336/D7336M Core Compressive Crush Stress, Core Crush Stroke Square or cylindrical gage section sandwich core speci- men loaded in through- thickness compression be- yond intitial core failure. Limited to honeycomb cores. Results are sensitive to sys- tem alignment, load eccentricity, and core thick- ness variation. Specimen is often precrushed to aid crush stroke determi- nation and promote uniformity of crush properties. Out-of-Plane Shear Test Methods C273/C273M Core Shear Strength, Core Shear Modulus Rectangular gage section sandwich or core specimen bonded to steel loading plates. Tensile or compressive load- ing of assembly imparts a through-thickness shear force to the core. Requires that specimens be bonded to load plates. Results are sensitive to adhe- sive and surface preparation at load plate bondlines. Results are sensitive to sys- tem alignment, load eccentricity, and core thick- ness variation. Does not produce pure shear, but secondary stress effects are minimal. C393/C393M Core Shear Strength, Core Shear Modulus Rectangular sandwich beam specimen. Ease of specimen construc- tion and testing. Includes both 3-point and 4-point techniques. Core shear stiffness may be determined using Practice D7250/D7250M. Method limited to 1D bend- ing. Failures often dominated by stress concentrations and secondary stresses at loading points, especially for low- density cores and thin fac- ings. Specified beam geometry required to ensure simple sandwich beam theory is valid. Specimen must be carefully designed to obtain the de- sired failure mode. Specimen is designed to in- duce core shear failure, but failure may initiate in a non- core element (facings, adhe- sive) of the sandwich struc- ture. Span-to-depth ratio >20:1 is recommended when testing for shear modulus. The ratio of face sheet thick- ness to core thickness (t/c) should be <0.10. D4762 − 11a 15
  • 16. TABLE 4 Continued Test Method Specimen Measured Property Description and Advantages Disadvantages Comments C394 Core Shear Stress Cycles (S-N) Data Specimen and apparatus equivalent to C273/C273M, except that core is bonded directly to loading plates. Same as C273/C273M. Limited to non-reversed fa- tigue loading conditions. Same as C273/C273M. Flexural Test Methods D7249/D7249M Sandwich Flexural Stiffness, Facesheet Compressive Strength, Facesheet Tensile Strength Rectangular sandwich beam specimen. Ease of specimen construc- tion and testing. Standard geometry uses 4-point loading technique. Flexural stiffness may be de- termined using Practice D7250/D7250M. Method limited to 1D bend- ing. Failures often dominated by stress concentrations and secondary stresses at loading points, especially with speci- mens having low-density cores and thin facings. Specified beam geometry required to ensure simple sandwich beam theory is valid. Specimen must be carefully designed to obtain the de- sired failure mode. Specimen is designed to in- duce facing tensile or com- pressive failure, but failure may initiate in a non-facing element (core, adhesive) of the sandwich structure. The ratio of face sheet thick- ness to core thickness (t/c) should be <0.10. D5467/D5467M Facesheet Compressive Strength, Compressive Modulus, Stress-Strain Response Sandwich beam specimen loaded in 4-point bending. Intended result is a compres- sion failure mode of the facesheet. Data is especially applicable to sandwich structures. Fixturing is simple compared to other compression tests. Limited to high-modulus com- posites. An expensive specimen that is not recommended unless the structure warrants its use. Strain gages required to ob- tain modulus and strain-to- failure data. Must take care to avoid core failure modes. Narrow (1 in. wide) specimen may not be suitable for mate- rials with coarse features, such as fabrics with large filament count tows (12K or more) or certain braided ma- terials. D6416/D6416M Pressure-Deflection Response, Pressure-Strain Response, Sandwich Bending and Shear Stiffness Two-dimensional plate flexure induced by a well-defined distributed load. Apparatus, instrumentation ensure applied pressure dis- tribution is known. Failures typically initiate away from edges. Specimens are relatively large, facilitating study of manufacturing defects and process variables. For studies of failure me- chanics and other quantita- tive sandwich analyses, only small panel deflections are allowed. The test fixture is necessarily more elaborate, and some calibration is required to verify simply-supported boundary conditions. Results highly dependent upon panel edge boundary conditions and pressure dis- tribution. Relatively large specimen and support fixture geometry. The same caveats applying to D7249/D7249M (above) could apply to D6416/ D6416M. However, this method is not limited to sandwich compos- ites; D6416/D6416M can be used to evaluate the 2-dimensional flexural proper- ties of any square plate. Distributed load is provided using a water-filled bladder. Ratio of support span to av- erage sandwich specimen thickness should be between 10 to 30. C480/C480M Flexural Deflection versus Time Flat rectangular sandwich beam specimen loaded in 3-point bending. Failures often dominated by stress concentrations and secondary stresses at loading points. Specimen must be carefully designed to obtain the de- sired failure mode. Loading is imparted to the sandwich beam using a weight attached to a lever arm. Core Constituent Property Test Methods C271/C271M Core Density Flat rectangular sandwich core specimen. Results are sensitive to length, width and thickness variation. C366/C366M Core Thickness Flat rectangular sandwich core specimen. Two methods provided (roller, disk). Results are sensitive to ap- plied pressure during mea- surement. C272 Core Water Absorption Flat rectangular sandwich core specimen. Two methods provided (immersion, humidity condi- tioning). Results are sensitive to water collected on surfaces. For specimens that collect water on surfaces, specimens may be dipped in alcohol which is allowed to evapo- rate. D4762 − 11a 16
  • 17. TABLE 4 Continued Test Method Specimen Measured Property Description and Advantages Disadvantages Comments F1645/F1645M Honeycomb Core Water Migration Flat rectangular sandwich core specimen bonded to transparent facings. Water is introduced into one cell and permeates through the sample. Results are sensitive to the permeability of the facings and adhesive. A constant head of water must be maintained to ensure consistent pressure. Water migration may be monitored either by mass or volumetric measurement. Colored dye may be added to water to aid in visualizing mi- gration. C363/C363M Honeycomb Core Node Tensile Strength Flat rectangular sandwich core specimen. Specimen ends are pinned into loading fixture which is loaded in tension. Strength is sensitive to speci- men alignment and load ec- centricity. Failure can be dominated by stress concentration at load introduction locations. Property formerly entitled core delamination strength. D6772 Honeycomb Core Dimen- sional Stability Flat rectangular sandwich core specimen, measures in-plane core dimensional stability after thermal expo- sure. Requires accurate geometric measurement of core defor- mation after thermal expo- sure. Recommended to pot se- lected cells with resin or ad- hesive to aid deformation measurement. D6790 Honeycomb Core Pois- son’s Ratio Flat square sandwich core specimen. Specimen is bent around a cylinder. Dimensional measurements are used to determine Pois- son’s ratio. Requires accurate geometric measurement of core deflec- tion. D4762 − 11a 17
  • 18. TABLE 5 Constituent/Precursor/Thermophysical Test Methods Test Method Specimen Measured Property Description and Advantages Disadvantages Comments Reinforcement Property Test Methods D3800 Fiber Density Test method for density of high-modulus continuous and discontinuous fibers. D4018 Carbon Fiber Tow Proper- ties: -Tensile Modulus -Tensile Strength -Density -Mass per Unit Length -Sizing Content -Moisture Absorption Provides test methods for continuous filament car- bon and graphite yarns, rovings and tows. Tensile properties are de- termined using resin- impregnated fiber. Tensile testing requires careful specimen prepara- tion. The resin used to impreg- nate the fibers can affect the tensile test results. D4102 Fiber Weight Loss Test method for determin- ing weight loss of carbon fibers exposed to hot am- bient air. Exposure conditions are: -24 h at 375°C (707°F). -500 h at 315°C (600°F). Determines oxidative re- sistance of carbon fibers for use in high- temperature applications. Matrix (Resin) Physical Property Test Methods D792 Density Test method for density of plastics using immersion methods. Ease of test specimen preparation and testing. Some specimens may be affected by water; alter- nate immersion liquids are optional. D1505 Density Test method for density of plastics using density gra- dient method. Typically used for film and sheeting materials D2471 Gel Time Test method for determin- ing gel time and peak exothermic temperature of reacting thermosetting resins Used for testing neat res- ins. For composite prepregs, see D3532 be- low. D4473 Cure Behavior Test method for cure be- havior of plastics by mea- suring dynamic mechani- cal properties. Extent of Cure Test Methods D3531 Resin Flow Test method for resin flow of prepreg tape or sheet using square 2-ply speci- men heated in a platen press. Limited to carbon fiber- epoxy prepreg materials. D3532 Gel Time Test method for gel time of prepreg tape or sheet Limited to carbon fiber- epoxy prepreg materials. Constituent Content Test Methods C613/C613M Constituent Content Test method for Soxhlet extraction procedure to determine the matrix content, reinforcement content, and filler content of composite material prepreg. Limited to prepreg materi- als. Not suitable for cured composites. D3171 Fiber, Resin, Void Content Test method for fiber, resin, and void content of resin-matrix composites by either digestion of the matrix or by thickness of a material of known fiber areal weight (void content not determined). Includes methods for metal matrix composites as well. The resin digestion meth- ods are primarily intended for cured thermoset matri- ces but may also be suit- able for some thermoplas- tics as well as prepreg resin content for materials that do not respond well to other methods. Constituent Content Test Methods (cont’d) D4762 − 11a 18
  • 19. TABLE 5 Continued Test Method Specimen Measured Property Description and Advantages Disadvantages Comments D3529/D3529M Resin Content Test method for matrix solids content and matrix content using extraction by organic solvent. Limited to prepreg materi- als. Resins that have started to cross-link (for example, B-staged resins) may be difficult to extract; D3171 methods are recom- mended for these materi- als. Does not determine or require reporting of rein- forcement content. Not suitable for cured composites. D3530/D3530M Volatiles Content Test method for volatiles content of epoxy-matrix prepreg tape and sheet Limited to prepreg materi- als. Limited to reinforcement material types which are substantially unaffected by the temperature se- lected for use in removing volatiles from the matrix material. Not suitable for cured composites. D2734 Void Content Test methods for void content of reinforced plas- tics. Ease of test specimen preparation and testing. Limited to composites for which the effects of igni- tion on the materials are known. May not be suitable for reinforcements consisting of metals, organic materials, or inorganic materials that may gain or lose weight. The presence of filler in some composites is not accounted for. D3171 is preferred for advanced composites. Void content of less than 1 % is difficult to measure accurately. D2584 Resin Content Test method for ignition loss of cured reinforced resins. Ease of test specimen preparation and testing. The presence of filler in some composites is not accounted for. D3171 is preferred for advanced composites. Result may be used as resin content under speci- fied limitations. Thermo-Physical Test Methods D696 Thermal Expansion ver- sus Temperature Curves, Coefficients of Thermal Expansion Test method for linear thermal expansion of plastic materials having coefficients of expansion greater than 1 × 10-6 /°C by use of a vitreous silica dilatometer. Ease of test specimen preparation and testing. Suitable for random and continuous fiber compos- ites. Limited to temperature range of -30°C to 30°C. Use E228 for other tem- peratures. This test method cannot be used for very low ther- mal expansion coefficient materials, such as unidi- rectional graphite fiber composites. E228 Thermal Expansion ver- sus Temperature Curves, Coefficients of Thermal Expansion Test method for linear thermal expansion over the temperature range of -180 to 900°C using vitre- ous silica push rod or tube dilatometers. Suitable for discontinuous or continuous fiber com- posites of defined orienta- tion state. Good for low values of thermal expansion. Precision greater than for D696. Precision significantly lower than for E289. Thermo-Physical Test Methods (cont’d) D4762 − 11a 19
  • 20. TABLE 5 Continued Test Method Specimen Measured Property Description and Advantages Disadvantages Comments E289 Thermal Expansion ver- sus Temperature Curves, Coefficients of Thermal Expansion Test method for linear thermal expansion of rigid solids using either a Mi- chelson or Fizeau interfer- ometer. Suitable for composites with very low values of thermal expansion. Precision is listed as bet- ter than +40 nm/m/K. E1461 Thermal Diffusivity Uses laser flash tech- nique. With specific heat measurement, can be used to calculate thermal conductivity indirectly. E1269 Specific Heat Uses Differential Scan- ning Calorimetry. Transition Temperature Test Methods D648 Heat Deflection Tempera- ture Test method for determin- ing temperature at which an arbitrary deformation occurs when specimen is subjected to an arbitrary set of testing conditions. Ease of test specimen preparation and testing. Deflection temperature is dependent on specimen thickness and fiber rein- forcement variables. Test data used for mate- rial screening. Test data is not intended for design purposes. D3418 Glass Transition Tempera- ture (Tg) Test method for determi- nation of transition tem- peratures of polymers by differential thermal analy- sis or differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). Ease of test specimen preparation and testing. Not suitable for compos- ites with low resin con- tent. The correlation between thermally measured tran- sition temperatures and mechanical property tran- sitions has not been suit- ably established. D4065 Transition Temperatures, Elastic Moduli, Loss Moduli Practice for determining the transition temperatures, elastic, and loss moduli of plastics over a range of temperatures, frequencies, or time, by free vibration and reso- nant or nonresonant forced vibration tech- niques. Can use variety of test specimen geometries and loading methods. Requires specialized equipment. For best results, tests should be run on unrein- forced resin. D7028 Glass Transition Tempera- ture (DMA Tg) Test method for determin- ing the glass transition temperature (Tg) of com- posites using Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) in flexural loading mode. Tests can be per- formed using both dry and wet specimens (moisture conditioned) to allow for comparison. Requires specialized equipment. Results are sensitive to the oscillation frequency, heating rate and specimen/test geom- etries. Intended for polymer ma- trix composites reinforced by continuous, oriented, high modulus fibers. One of the major fiber direc- tions must be parallel to the length of the specimen. D4762 − 11a 20
  • 21. ASTM International takes no position respecting the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with any item mentioned in this standard. Users of this standard are expressly advised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk of infringement of such rights, are entirely their own responsibility. This standard is subject to revision at any time by the responsible technical committee and must be reviewed every five years and if not revised, either reapproved or withdrawn. Your comments are invited either for revision of this standard or for additional standards and should be addressed to ASTM International Headquarters. Your comments will receive careful consideration at a meeting of the responsible technical committee, which you may attend. If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below. This standard is copyrighted by ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States. Individual reprints (single or multiple copies) of this standard may be obtained by contacting ASTM at the above address or at 610-832-9585 (phone), 610-832-9555 (fax), or service@astm.org (e-mail); or through the ASTM website (www.astm.org). Permission rights to photocopy the standard may also be secured from the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, Tel: (978) 646-2600; http://www.copyright.com/ TABLE 6 Environmental Conditioning/Resistance Test Methods Test Method Specimen Measured Property Description and Advantages Disadvantages Comments Equilibrium Moisture Content/Conditioning Test Methods D5229/D5229M Through-Thickness Mois- ture Diffusivity, Equilibrium Moisture Content, Equilibrium Con- ditioning Rigorous determination of moisture equilibrium for various exposure levels (including dry) as well as moisture absorption con- stants. Used for conditioning test coupons prior to use in other test methods Requires long- conditioning times for many materials. Assumes 1-D Fickian be- havior for material absorp- tion constant determina- tion. A faster two-specimen approach documented in MIL-HDBK-17 has not yet been included in this stan- dard. D570 Equilibrium Percentage Increase in Weight Determination of equilib- rium weight increase due to long-term immersion in water. Weighing schedule is in- dependent of material dif- fusion characteristics. D5229/D5229M is pre- ferred for general mois- ture conditioning of com- posites. Non-Equilibrium Conditioning Test Methods D618 None. Test method for condition- ing plastics prior to test. No standard mechanical tests are specified. Weight gain is not moni- tored. Not recommended for conditioning composites. D570 Percentage Increase in Weight Determination of weight increase due to immer- sion in water for a defined period. Multiple conditioning op- tions are provided, with limited guidance provided on selection of param- eters. D5229/D5229M is pre- ferred for general mois- ture conditioning of com- posites. Environmental Aging Test Methods C481 Property Retention After Aging Sandwich construction specimens subjected to environmental aging cycles. Standard environmental cycles may not be repre- sentative of all sandwich construction applications. Two standard aging cycles are defined. Chemical Resistance Test Methods C581 Changes to: Hardness, Weight, Thickness, Specimen Appearance Appearance of Immersion Media, Flexural Strength, Flexural Modulus. Test method for chemical resistance of thermoset- ting resins. Ease of test specimen preparation and testing. Flexible exposure condi- tions. The only mechanical tests specified are flexural. Weight gain is not moni- tored. No standard exposure times or temperatures are specified. Exposure chemicals, times, temperatures are left to the user’s discre- tion. D543 Changes to: Weight, Thickness, Specimen Appearance Tensile Strength, Tensile Modulus. Practices for evaluating the resistance of plastics to chemical reagents. Standard exposure time and temperature set as a starting point. The only mechanical load- ing type specified is ten- sile; others are optional Longer exposure times may be desirable. Other mechanical loading types may be specified. D4762 − 11a 21