SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 89
Download to read offline
1
    1
ADVISORY BOARD
•   CHAIRMAN :-   DR. A. K. ROY

•   MEMBER:-      DR. D. R. MALAVIYA

•   MEMBER:-      DR. P. KAUSHAL

•   MEMBER:-      DR. A. CHANDRA

•   MEMBER:-      DR. SURESH KUMAR

                                       2
   Assessment of molecular genetic diversity
    among different species of Trifolium      and
    ecotypes of T. alexandrinum.


   Study      on       interspecific/intervarietal
    compatibility and inheritance of traits like
    regeneration ability.
                                                      3
•   Genus: Trifolium Tourn (L.).

•   Family: Leguminosae.

•   Sub-family: Palpilionaceae.

•   It comprises of 290 annual and perennial herbs
    commonly     called   clovers    including   several
    cultivated and pasture species of high fodder value.



                                                           4
   The important perennial pasture clover T.
    repens, T. hybridum, T. pratense and T.
    ambiguum are widely distributed in the
    temperate and sub-temperate regions of the
    world.

   The annual types such as T. resupinatum, T.
    subterraneum and T. alexandrinum are
    commonly cultivated as winter annuals in
    the tropical and subtropical regions.
                                                  5
   The genus name Trifolium refers to the distinctive
leaves usually composed of three leaflets (trifoliolate).

   The Mediterranean region is the centre of diversity
of the genus Trifolium (Zohary and Heller, 1984).

  Berseem is widely adapted by the farmers of north,
northwest, eastern and central India.

   Nearly 2 million hectare arable land is under
cultivation of Berseem with an average national
productivity of 85 t/ha.
                                                            6
   The importance of crop is known for:-
    Its high green fodder production (up to 100t/ha).
    Its multicut nature (6-7 cuts).
   Long duration of green fodder availability
    (November to April).
   High crude protein content (20-24%).
   High digestability.
   High palatability .
   High nitrogen fixation ability.

                                                         7
1: Characterization of Trifolium species based on
  morphology:-




                                                    8
   To incorporate desirable traits like early flowering
    from Fahli group and regeneration ability from
    Mescavi   group,      inter-varietal   crosses   were
    attempted among three ecotypes of T. alexandrinum
    (Berseem) i.e., Mescavi (cv Wardan and BB-2),
    Saidi (Ex-8) and Fahli (FAO-5).

   F1 hybrids were crossed to male parent and female
    parents to obtain BC1 seed.
                                                            9
   All   F1s     and      their    parents,     were
    characterized    for     12    qualitative   and
    quantitative traits.

   F2 and BC1 populations were characterized
    for 10 different morphological attributes
    including metric and non-metric traits.

                                                        10
   Hybrids and their parents were analyzed for
    esterase and protein native banding pattern
    along with their parents.

   F2 progenies and their respective parents
    were compared only for esterase isozyme
    banding pattern.

                                                  11
BSA (Michelmore et al, 1991) was used to identify
RAPD markers linked with regeneration and non-
regeneration trait.

BC1 population from contrasting parents Wardan
(regenerating genotype) & FAO-5 (non regenerating
genotype) was developed by backcrossing F1 progenies
with Wardan.

4 bulks representing viz., P1 bulk (Wardan bulk), P1
type bulk (Wardan type plant progenies), P2 bulk (FAO-
5) & P2 type bulk (FAO-5 type plant progenies) were
prepared and screened with 110 RAPD primers for
identification of putative marker linked to regeneration.   12
DNA extracted from fresh leaves and PCR

reaction carried out as described by Williams

(1993).

18 decamer RAPD primers were used in analysis

of diversity within and between different ecotypes

of T. alexandrinum.                                  13
A total of 38 SSR primer pairs were used to estimate
polymorphism among 24 species of genus Trifolium.

DNA isolated and PCR reaction was performed in 10µl
volume containing template DNA, Taq polymerase enzyme,
Taq polymerase buffer, dNTPs, forward and reverse
primers.

The thermocycle parameters were used as described by
Barret (2004) with minor modifications.

The PCR products were electrophoresed on 3.3%
agarose gel.
                                                         14
To identify the stages of pre and post fertilization
barriers where 3 genotypes of T. alexandrinum
(EC511781, Wardan and BB-2) were used as
female parent and crosses were made with
different Trifolium species.

Pollen tube growth was studied at regular
interval of 1hr, 3hrs, 5hrs and 8hrs after
pollination.


The karyotype will be prepared using root –tip
mitotic chromosomes studies based on standard
root –tip squash method after pretreatment,
fixation, hydrolysis and squash method.

                                                        15
 The metric data was analyzed statistically to group


  the plants of similar types based on their similarity.


  Euclidian cluster analysis for grouping of genotypes

  and Mahalanobis Euclidean2 analysis was used.



                                                           16
17
Intra and Interspecific variation analyzed in 51
accessions representing 19 species of genus Trifolium.


Wide range of variation observed for most of the
traits like plant height (19-143.89 cm), number of
branches (5.67-55.11), number of node (5.0-16.33) etc.



                                                         18
S.N.         Species Name          T1          T2       T3        T4        T5        T6         T7         T8        T9       T10
 1     T. alexandrinum Mean        6.5        9.56     4.78      0.36      67.28     1.22       3.34       1.06      1.34      6.22
                                                                           59.57-               2.97-     0.83-      0.93-
                         Range   4.0-8.67   8.33-13.0 3.77-5.7 0.3-0.4              0.93-1.8                                  6.0-6.67
                                                                           71.33                4.13      1.47       2.23
                          SD       1.55      1.73      0.75      0.04      4.08      0.34       0.43       0.22      0.57      0.27
 2      T. compestre     Mean     55.11      16.11      1.3      0.25      63.22     0.79       1.44        0.8      0.62      8.33
                                 43.33-      14.67-    1.03-               59.67-    0.43-                0.73-
                         Range                                  0.2-0.27                       1.3-1.53             0.6-0.67 12-Jun
                                 62.67       17.67     1.47                67.33     1.33                 0.83
                          SD     10.34         1.5     0.24      0.04       3.86     0.48       0.13       0.06      0.04      3.21
 3       T. apertum      Mean     9.67        16.33    4.17      0.47       90.33    1.23       2.83        0.8       1.9      7.33
                         Range 8.0-11.00     19-Dec   4.0-4.5   0.4-0.5    87-93    1.2-1.3    2.5-3.1    0.8-0.8    1.7-2     8-Jun
                          SD      1.53        3.79     0.29      0.06       3.06     0.06       0.31         0       0.17      1.15
 4     T.angustifolium   Mean     17.5         9.5     2.35      0.315     57.415    1.62       3.83        0.7       2.7       8.5
                                                                                     1.27-      3.63-     0.47-                7.67-
                         Range 9.67-25.33 7.33-11.67 1.9-2.8 0.23-0.4 19.83-95                                      2.6-2.8
                                                                                     1.97       4.03      0.93                 9.33
                          SD      11.07       3.07     0.64      0.12      53.15     0.49       0.28       0.33      0.14      1.17
 5      T. spumosum      Mean      5.67         5      1.37      0.25       19       2.79       1.12       0.99      1.04      6.17
                                                       1.17-     0.23-     15.33-    2.67-      1.10-     0.97-
                         Range 5.33-6.00 4.67-5.33                                                                  1.0-1.07 6.0-6.33
                                                       1.57      0.27      22.67     2.90       1.13      1.00
                          SD      0.47        0.47     0.28      0.03       5.19     0.16       0.02       0.02      0.05       0.23
 6       T. diffusum     Mean      10          11      2.27      0.27      49.33     1.33        2.1       0.77       1.6         4
                         Range   10-Oct      12-Oct   2.0-2.5   0.2-0.3    45-53    1.3-1.4    2.0-2.2    0.7-0.8   1.5-1.7    4-Apr
                          SD       0            1      0.25      0.06       4.04     0.06        0.1       0.06       0.1         0
 7     T. grandiflorum   Mean     5.67        7.67      2.2       0.2        57      0.37       1.77       0.83       0.8         6
                         Range   6-May        9-Jul   2.0-2.4   0.2-0.2    46-68    0.3-0.4     1.6-2     0.8-0.9   0.8-0.8    6-Jun
                          SD      0.58        1.15      0.2        0         11      0.06       0.21       0.06        0       19 0
8      T. hirtum      Mean     11.33        6.5       1.1      0.25      32.33      1.97      1.55     1.115       1         6

                              10.33-                                     31.33-
                      Range              6.33-6.67 1.03-1.17 0.23-0.27            1.97-1.97 1.5-1.6 1.1-1.13 0.93-1.07     6-Jun
                              12.33                                      33.33

                       SD      1.41         0.24      0.1      0.03       1.41       0        0.07     0.02       0.1        0

9    T. echinatum     Mean     16.93       10.93      2.87     0.31      91.67      0.45      1.85     1.01      1.07       6.07

                              11.33-
                      Range              7.33-12.33 1.77-5.07 0.3-0.33   81-105   0.3-0.77 1.73-1.97 0.93-1.23   1-1.2    5.33-7.33
                              25.67

                       SD      6.62         2.07      1.39     0.01        9        0.19      0.09     0.13      0.08       0.76

10     T. repens      Mean     15.96       13.92      1.89     0.24      71.38      5.51      1.53     1.16      0.94      11.58

                              13.67-       13.33-
                      Range                         1.67-2.37 0.2-0.27 62.33-76 4.1-6.98 1.33-1.72 1.0-1.33      0.87-1   9.33-15
                              18.83        15.17

                       SD       2.4         0.85      0.33     0.03       6.24       1.2      0.18     0.13      0.06       2.55

11    T .hybridum     Mean     12.33       10.78      1.61     0.34      84.45      2.62      2.49     1.48      1.66       5.33

                      Max      15.33        12        1.7      0.37      91.67      2.83      2.5      1.57      1.77        6

                      Mini     10.67        9.33      1.43     0.33       76        2.47      2.47      1.4      1.57       4.67

                       SD       2.6         1.35      0.16     0.02       7.91      0.19      0.02     0.09       0.1       0.67

12   T. resupinatum   Mean     11.39       13.89      2.28     0.47      143.89     1.93      1.98      1.1      0.96       4.56

                                           12.67-                         89.0-
                      Range 8.67-13.67              2.13-2.7 0.37-0.57            1.57-2.27 1.67-2.23 0.87-1.3 0.83-1.03 4.0-6.67
                                           15.33                         193.33

                       SD      1.81         1.15      0.21     0.09      41.32      0.29      0.2      0.19      0.08      1.07
                                                                                                                          20
13     T. subterraneum   Mean     27.67       13.67      1.55      0.28      61.33      1.66       1.01     0.82      0.59       6.89
                                    25.67-     12.33-
                           Range                         0.50-2.17 0.23-0.30 24.0-81.00 0.83-2.07 0.87-1.13 0.77-0.90 0.37-0.70 2.0-10.00
                                    29.67      16.00
                            SD        2         2.03       0.91      0.04      32.35      0.72       0.13     0.07      0.19       4.29
            T .pilulare    Mean      15.67       14        2.2      0.27     60.33      0.33      0.97       0.8      0.37       7
  14                       Range   10.0-24.0 13.0-15.0 1.90-2.50 0.20-0.30 54.0-65.0 0.30-0.40 0.90-1.0 0.70-0.90 0.30-0.50 6.0-8.0
                            SD        7.37       1         0.3      0.06      5.69      0.06      0.06       0.1      0.12       1
  15        T. balansae    Mean       8.33       10       2.67       0.2     61.33      0.37       1.7      0.67      0.97       6
                           Range   6.0-11.00 9.0-11.00 2.5-2.90 0.20-0.20 52.0-70.00 0.30-0.50 1.70-1.70 0.60-0.70 0.90-1.10 6.0-6.00
                            SD        2.52       1        0.21        0       9.02      0.12        0       0.06      0.12       0
  16       T .ligusticum   Mean        7       11.33      2.33      0.27     67.33       0.3       1.9      0.87      1.03     6.67
                           Range     7-Jul    12-Nov    2.0-2.7 0.2-0.3      60-77    0.2-0.4 1.7-2.1      0.7-1    0.9-1.1    6.0-8
                            SD         0        0.58      0.35      0.06      8.74       0.1       0.2      0.15      0.12     1.15
  17       T. lappaceum    Mean      18.34     12.17      2.18       0.3      84.5      0.37      1.72      0.85       0.9     7.34
                                                                               79.67-
                           Range   15.67-21 11.0-13.33 2.13-2.23 0.3-0.3                0.37-0.37 1.67-1.77 0.83-0.87 0.87-0.93 6.67-8
                                                                               89.33
                            SD      3.77      1.65      0.07        0       6.83         0      0.07      0.03      0.04    0.94
  18       T. clypeatum    Mean     10.5     7.335      3.75      0.47     83.335       5.5    2.635      2.03     1.935      8
                           Range 9.33-11.67 7.0-7.67 3.67-3.83 0.47-0.47 82.0-84.67 5.47-5.53 2.5-2.77 2.03-2.03 1.97-1.97 8-Aug
                            SD      1.65      0.47      0.11        0       1.89       0.04     0.19        0       0.05      0
  19        T. dasyrum     Mean     47.5     6.335     1.685     0.335     54.835       1.6     2.32     0.985      1.83   4.335
                                    35.33-
                           Range              6.0-6.67   1.4-1.97 0.3-0.37 49.67-60 1.17-2.03 2.17-2.47 0.9-1.07 1.63-2.03 4.0-4.67
                                    59.67
                            SD      17.21       0.47        0.4      0.05       7.3       0.61       0.21     0.12      0.28       0.47
                                             T1-No.of Branch          T2-No of Node                         T3-Internodal Length
Total Accession=48                           T4-Stem Diameter         T5-Height./ Rossete Diameter          T6-Petiole Length
Total Species=19                             T7-Leaflet Length        T8-Leaflet Width                      T9-Stipule Length
                                             T10-No. of Veins on Stipule
                                                                                                                                21
0
                               2
                                   3
                                       4
                                           5
                                                               6




                           1
                                                                                     0
                                                                                         10
                                                                                              20
                                                                                                   30
                                                                                                        40
                                                                                                                           50
                                                                                                                                       60
  T.alexandrinum
                                                                   T.alexandrinum
       T.compestre
                                                                      T.compestre
         T.apertum
                                                                       T.apertum
          T.angusti
                                                                        T.angusti
      T.spumosum
                                                                      T.spumosum
        T.diffusum
                                                                       T.diffusum
     T.grandiflorum
                                                                   T.grandiflorum
          T.hirtum
                                                                         T.hirtum
       T.echinatum
                                                                      T.echinatum
          T.repens
                                                                         T.repens
        T.hybridum
                                                                      T.hybridum
                                                                                                         No. of branches




     T.resupinatum                                                  T.resupinatum
  T.subterraneum                                                   T.subterraneum


                                           Internodal length
          T.pilulare                                                    T.pilulare
        T.balansae                                                     T.balansae
       T.ligusticum                                                   T.ligusticum
      T.lappaceum                                                    T.lappaceum
       T.clypeatum                                                    T.clypeatum
        T. dasyrum                                                     T. dasyrum
                                                                                     0
                                                                                     2
                                                                                               6
                                                                                               8


                                                                                     4
                                                                                              10
                                                                                                        12
                                                                                                        14
                                                                                                        16
                                                                                                        18




                     0
                     0
                     0
                     0
                     0
                     0
                     0
                     0



                     0
                     0
                     1




T.alexandrinum                                                     T.alexandrinum

     T.compestre                                                      T.compestre

       T.apertum                                                       T.apertum
        T.angusti                                                        T.angusti
     T.spumosum                                                       T.spumosum
       T.diffusum                                                      T.diffusum
T.grandiflorum                                                     T.grandiflorum
         T.hirtum                                                        T.hirtum
     T.echinatum                                                      T.echinatum
        T.repens                                                         T.repens
                                           Stem diameter




      T.hybridum                                                       T.hybridum
                                                                                                                            No. of nodes




 T.resupinatum                                                      T.resupinatum
T.subterraneum                                                     T.subterraneum
        T.pilulare                                                      T.pilulare
      T.balansae                                                       T.balansae
     T.ligusticum                                                     T.ligusticum
     T.lappaceum                                                     T.lappaceum
22




     T.clypeatum                                                      T.clypeatum
      T. dasyrum                                                       T. dasyrum
1
                                1
                                    2
                                            3
                                                3
                                                           4
                                                                     5




                        0
                                        2
                                                                 4
                                                                                            0
                                                                                                20
                                                                                                     40
                                                                                                          60
                                                                                                               80
                                                                                                                    100
                                                                                                                          120
                                                                                                                                       140
                                                                                                                                                    160
     T.alexandrinum
        T.compestre                                                        T.alexandrinum
          T.apertum                                                           T.compestre
           T.angusti                                                            T.apertum
       T.spumosum                                                                T.angusti
          T.diffusum                                                          T.spumosum

     T.grandiflorum                                                             T.diffusum
                                                                            T.grandiflorum
            T.hirtum
                                                                                  T.hirtum
        T.echinatum
                                                                              T.echinatum
           T.repens
                                                                                 T.repens
                                                                                                                                         Plant height




         T.hybridum
                                                                               T.hybridum
      T.resupinatum
                                                                            T.resupinatum




                                                Leaflet length
 T.subterraneum
                                                                           T.subterraneum
           T.pilulare
                                                                                 T.pilulare
         T.balansae                                                            T.balansae
        T.ligusticum                                                          T.ligusticum
       T.lappaceum                                                           T.lappaceum
        T.clypeatum                                                           T.clypeatum
         T. dasyrum                                                            T. dasyrum
                                                                                          0
                                                                                                               3
                                                                                                                      4
                                                                                                                                    5
                                                                                                                                                        6




                                                                                                1
                                                                                                      2




                     0
                            1
                                    1
                                            2
                                                    2
                                                                 3




                                                                     T.alexandrinum
 T.alexandrinum
                                                                          T.compestre
       T.compestre
                                                                            T.apertum
         T.apertum
                                                                             T.angusti
           T.angusti
                                                                          T.spumosum
       T.spumosum
                                                                            T.diffusum
         T.diffusum
                                                                     T.grandiflorum
     T.grandiflorum
                                                                              T.hirtum
           T.hirtum
                                                                                                                                Petiole length




                                                                          T.echinatum
       T.echinatum
                                                                              T.repens
          T.repens
                                                Leaflet width




        T.hybridum                                                         T.hybridum

      T.resupinatum                                                      T.resupinatum

 T.subterraneum                                                      T.subterraneum

          T.pilulare                                                         T.pilulare
         T.balansae                                                         T.balansae
        T.ligusticum                                                       T.ligusticum
       T.lappaceum                                                        T.lappaceum
23




       T.clypeatum                                                        T.clypeatum
        T. dasyrum                                                          T. dasyrum
0
                             1
                                 1
                                         2
                                                 2
                                                          3
                                                                                          3
     T.alexandrinum
        T.compestre
         T.apertum
           T.angusti
       T.spumosum
         T.diffusum
     T.grandiflorum
           T.hirtum
        T.echinatum
           T.repens
         T.hybridum
      T.resupinatum
     T.subterraneum
          T.pilulare
                                                               Stipule length




         T.balansae
        T.ligusticum
       T.lappaceum
        T.clypeatum
         T. dasyrum




                         0
                             2
                                     6
                                             8
                                                     10
                                                          12
                                                                                              14




                                 4




      T.alexandrinum
         T.compestre
           T.apertum
            T.angusti
         T.spumosum
           T.diffusum
       T.grandiflorum
             T.hirtum
         T.echinatum
            T.repens
          T.hybridum
       T.resupinatum
      T.subterraneum
            T.pilulare
                                                                    No. of veins on stipule




          T.balansae
         T.ligusticum
         T.lappaceum
         T.clypeatum
24




          T. dasyrum
Wide variation was recorded for various
qualitative traits among the species studied.

Growth habit:- Most of the Trifolium species were
prostrate in nature while T. alexandrinum showed
erect or semi-erect growth habit.

Flowering period: T. clypeatum and T. dasyrum
flowered in 2nd week of February while T. hybridum
EC425029 followed by T. diffusum EC528538
flowered in 1st week of May. Most of the species
flowered in the month of March.                      25
Fig: Variation for growth habit in Trifolium species.




                                                        26
Petiole hairiness: varied from hairy to non hairy.
T. spumosum and T. resupinatum had non hairy or glabrous
petiole while dense hairs in few species viz., T. diffusum, T.
hirtum, T. pilulare, T. balansae, T. clypeatum and T.
alexandrinum EC539057.
Leaflet hairiness:- Hairy or dense hairy leaflets were
found in most of the species viz., T. apertum, T.
angustifolium, T. diffusum, T. hirtum, T. balansae and T.
dasyrum but species like T. spumosum, T. repens, T. hybridum
and T. resupinatum had non hairy or glabrous leaflets.           27
Leaflet apex shape:- Round leaflet apex was found
to be common however the species such as T.
apertum, T. angustifolium, T. resupinatum, T. pilulare
and T. dasyrum had only tapering leaflet apex.


Leaf shape:-This trait varied from lanceolate,
oval, ovate, elongated, obovate, to rhomboid where
lanceolate leaf shape was seen predominantly.
                                                         28
Fig: Variation for leaf shape & leaf margin in different species of genus Trifolium.




                                                                                29
Leaflet margin:-Leaflet had either serrate or entire
where entire margin was quite frequent.
Inflorescence apex shape:- Round was observed to
be predominant with some conical or tapering apex.
Flower colour:- A wide range of variation has been
observed for flower colour which varied from white to
dark purple colour, white flower (in 15 accessions) was
most common among the species followed by light
pink flower (in 14 accessions).                           30
Fig: Variation for flower colour in different species of genus Trifolium.




                                                                     31
T. compestre, had yellow flower and T.

clypeatum, T. hirtum, T. echinatum had

flowers with white + pink petals. Flowers

of T. clypeatum were largest in size as

compared to other species.
                                            32
51 accessions of 19 Trifolium species were grouped
into 7 clusters based on similarities of Mahalanobis’s
D2 values.

Cluster-1 was the largest cluster with 30 accessions
followed by cluster-2 comprising of 8 accessions,
cluster-4 comprising of 6 accessions and cluster-3
comprising of 4 accessions.

Cluster-5 (T. alexandrinum EC418538), 6 (T.
angustifolium EC539064) & 7 (T. angustifolium
EC539058) were monotypic.                                33
Cluster   No. of accessions Species Name
No.       per cluster


1         30               T.echinatum EC425075, EC425076, T.lappaceum EC402165, T.echinatum EC425078, T.ligusticum
                           EC528544, T.lappaceum EC528542, T.resupinatum EC425071, T.echinatum EC425077, T.balansae
                           EC511775, T.grandiflorum EC528540, T.resupinatum EC425072, T.hybridum EC425029, EC401702,
                           T.hirtum EC425037, EC425039, T.hybridum EC401701, T.pilulare EC528544, T.diffusum EC528538,
                           T.subterraneum EC401717, T.spumosum EC528549, EC518781, T.repens           EC400984, T. dasyrum
                           EC511808,    T.subterraneum     EC401718,   T.echinatum    EC401714,   T.subterraneum   EC539068,
                           T.alexandrinum EC528530, EC539057, EC511781 & EC400773



2         8                T.clypeatum EC511807, EC528536, T.repens EC402155 A, EC400385 B, EC400987 A, EC402155 B,
                           EC400987 B & EC400385 A
3         4                T.compestre EC425028, EC5425027, EC402155 & T. dasyrum EC528537
4         6                T.resupinatum EC425036, EC425074, EC425073, EC401715, T.apertum EC401712 & T.alexandrinum
                           EC400976
5         1                T.alexandrinum EC418538
6         1                T.angustifolium EC539064
7         1                T.angustifolium EC539058
      Total clusters=7                Total Accession=51               Total species=19                                    34
Table:2 Mahalanobis Euclidean2 Cluster Distances (Genetic
  distance) based on Tocher’s clustering method between nineteen
  Trifolium species:-

            Cluster-1 Cluster-2 Cluster-3   Cluster-4 Cluster-5 Cluster-6 Cluster-7

Cluster-1    90.49     218.94    226.45     199.94     202.83    265.53    432.91

Cluster-2              98.92     301.67     288.95     409.07    424.08     728.9

Cluster-3                       107.35      402.47     440.78    341.85    545.03

Cluster-4                                   166.62     289.35    331.88    641.07

Cluster-5                                                0       104.94    187.68

Cluster-6                                                          0       145.47

Cluster-7                                                                     0
                                                                              35
Table:3 Clusters mean value for 10 quantitative characters in 7
 clusters based on morphological variations in 19 Trifolium species:-

            No. of   No. of   Internodal    Stem      Ht./ Rossete Petiole   Leaflet   Leaflet   Stipule   No. of Veins
            Branch   Node       length     Diameter    Diameter   Length Length        Width     Length    on Stipule


Cluster-1   14.17 10.52         2.37         0.3       67.87       1.38 1.88           0.98      1.07         6.10

Cluster-2   15.00 12.33         2.41        0.31       76.63       5.86 1.86           1.42      1.18        11.25

Cluster-3   56.25 13.58         1.47        0.28       62.42       1.10 1.70           0.87      0.98         7.25

Cluster-4   9.94 13.61          3.21        0.49      139.39 1.68 2.46                 1.12      1.10         5.44

Cluster-5   4.00 9.33           4.00        0.30       59.67       1.80 4.13           1.47      2.23         6.00

Cluster-6   25.33 11.67         2.80        0.40       95.00       1.97 3.63           0.93      2.28         7.67

Cluster-7   9.67 7.33           1.90        0.23       19.83       1.27 4.03           0.47      2.60         9.33
                                                                                                                36
F1 hybrid: 5 hybrids (named as C-552-1, C-552-2, C-
552-3, 380 and 468) were produced.


Hybrid varied from parents for growth habit,
axillary bud, flowering initiation, leaf wrinkles and
most of the quantitative traits which confirmed the
hybridity.

                                                        37
The similarity was estimated between 5 hybrids of Wardan
x FAO-5 combinations & their parents using the Jaccard
similarity matrix based on total 20 bands of esterase (10
bands) and native protein (10 bands).
                                          Wardan
        71%                                          Cluster-1
                                          468          (79%)
                                          C-552-2
                                                      Sub-cluster-2-1
                                           C-552-1      (83%)
              78%                                     Sub-cluster-2-2
        76%                               FAO5

                                           C-552-3
                                                     Cluster-3 (85%)
                                           380
 0.70         0.77     0.85       0.93    1.00                      38
Fig:- Morphological variation in different intervarietal hybrids.




                                                               39
Fig:- Morphological variation in different intervarietal hybrids.




                                                               40
Only 3 F1 hybrid i.e., C-552-1, C-552-2 and 380

successfully survived and produced 23 F2 individuals

representing 9 F2 individuals of C-552-1, 12 of C-552-2

and 2 of 380 survived.

These 23 F2 individuals were evaluated for

morphological characterization.

All F2 individuals showed segregation of traits.         41
In general, these F2 individuals were less vigorous then
F1s.

All F2 individuals       showed    different   vigour   and
regeneration.

Out of 23 F2 individuals, 7 were intermediate between the
parents, 7 were P1 type (female type branching) however
remaining 9 individuals were significantly more close to
male parent (P2) regarding flowering and branching.

F2 individuals, showed significant variation for days to
flower initiation ranging from 62 to 100 days as compared to
early flowering (66 to 70 days) in F1 hybrids.                 42
9 F2 progenies of this combination including their
   respective parents were analyzed for esterase isozyme
   system.
    Dendrogram generated, based on 11 polymorphic and
   1 monomorphic band, divided the progenies in 3 clusters.
                                               Wardan    Cluster-1
                                               1          (72%)
                                               2
                                               5
                                               FAO-5    Cluster-2
                                               9
                                               7
            (72%)
                                               3
                                               6
                                                     Cluster-3
                                               8
                                               4                     43
0.60        0.70       0.80        0.90       1.00
The genetic similarity was estimated between 11 F2
         progenies of hybrid C-552-1 and their parents using the
         Jaccard similarity matrix.
         Dendrogram revealed presence of 3 main clusters.
                                                   Wardan     Cluster-1
                                                   1
                                                   2
(62.1 %)                                           3
                                                   8
                                                   10
                                                   4         Cluster-2
                                                   5       (66.4% to 100%)
                                                   6
                                                   FAO-5
                                                   7
(61%)                                              11
                                                   9     Cluster-3
  0.60         0.70        0.80       0.90        1.00
                                                                             44
 33 BC1 plants were survived and evaluated for different
morphological attributes.

 For general vigour, BC1 plants were significantly similar to F2
plants.

The days to flowering ranged from 66 to 70 days with an average
of 67.33 days in F1 hybrids while in F2 and BC1 plants, it was 62 to
100 (average 80.78) and 82 to 98 days (average 89.24) respectively.

The traits like early flowering, dense secondary branching and
leaf wrinkles were noticed in F1 hybrids as in Fahli group (male
parent). These traits were more prominent in BC1 plants as
compared to F2 plants.                                           45
Only 7 BC1 plants survived successfully and were evaluated
for various morphological traits.

Vigour of BC1 plants was quite similar to F2 plants.

 The broad range for the character days to flowering
initiation was recorded in F2 plants ranging from 62 to 100
days. It was quite contrasting to BC1 plants, where days to
flowering ranged from 97 to 100 days and quite similar to P1
female parent (Wardan) showing a range of 90 to 94 days. In
P2 male parent (FAO-5) days to flowering initiation was
between 62 to 64 days whereas in F1 hybrids the range was 66
to 91 days.                                                  46
The regeneration was the characteristic feature of
female parent P1 (Wardan) segregated in F2 plants
(three poor, thirteen medium good and seven good
regeneration) as well as in BC1 plants (two good, two
medium good and two very good regeneration).
F1 hybrids showed dense branching and early
flowering while BC1 plants did not show early
flowering   and   dense   branching,   showing   their
closeness to P1 parent (Female: Wardan).                 47
BB-2 x FAO-5 Combination:-
In this combination 4 hybrid plants numbered as C-
579-1, C-579-2, 482 and C-10 were produced.
These hybrids varied significantly for all qualitative
traits except leaflet margin which was entire in all the
hybrids.
 However, semi-erect growth habit, hairy leaflet and
dense hairy stipule pubescence were similar in C-579-1,
C-579-2 and 482, while C-10 had erect growth, dense
hairy leaflet and hairy stipule.
Traits like petiole hairiness, leaflet apex shape and
leaflet colour were similar in all the hybrids except C-
579-1.
Variation was observed for quantitative traits among
the hybrids.                                               48
Biochemical characterization of BB-2 x FAO-5
                                 hybrids
       4 hybrids of BB-2 x FAO-5 were analyzed for native
       protein banding pattern along with parents.
       The dendrogram based on 11 bands of native protein
       was divided in 3 main clusters.
                                            BB-2
                                                      Sub-cluster 1-1
                                            C-579-1


                                            C-579-2   Sub-cluster 1-2
                          (88%)
                                            C-10
                                                    Cluster -2 (100%)
                                            FAO-5
       (74%)
                                            482    Cluster -3
0.70           0.77     0.85      0.93      1.00
                                                                        49
7 F2 individuals representing 5 F2 individuals of
C-10 hybrid and 2 F2 individuals of hybrid 482
survived successfully.
F2 progenies also differed for regeneration (one
very good, four good and two medium).
Flowering initiation was similar in F1 hybrids
and F2 individuals.
                                                     50
3 resembled male parent, 1 individual had

male type of high secondary branching and 1

individual was maternal type having less

secondary branches whereas 1 individual was

intermediate among both the parents.

                                              51
Similarity among F2 populations of BB-
                            2 x FAO-5
          UPGMA dendrogram was formed on the basis of 15 scorable
          bands of esterase isozyme in 7 F2 progenies and their parents .
          The population was divided in 2 main clusters; cluster-1 was
          comparatively larger where intra-cluster similarity ranged from
          66% to 100%.
                                                          BB-2
                                                          6       Sub-Cluster-1-1
                                                          7
                (66%-100%)
                                                          1
                                                          4 Sub-Cluster-1-2
                                                          5
  (55%)
                                                          2
                                                             Sub-Cluster-1-3
                                                         3
                                                         FAO-5 Cluster-2

0.50            0.63          0.75         0.88          1.00
                                                                                    52
Ex-8 x FAO-5 combination
 3 hybrid were obtained and named as C-560, C-564
and 203 which were similar for qualitative traits like
leaflet margin, leaflet shape, leaflet apex shape, leaflet
colour, stipule pubescence and flower colour.
 The hybrid C-560 was more similar to hybrid C-564
than hybrid 203 for qualitative traits.
 The hybrid C-564 was more vigorous having higher
values than other hybrids and the parents for most of the
quantitative traits.
 On comparing the hybrids with parents, it was
observed that leaflet margin, leaflet shape, axillary bud
and flower colour were similar among the parents and the
hybrids while rest of the qualitative traits varied.
                                                             53
The dendrogram was based on 24 bands representing
       10 bands of esterase and 14 bands of protein native.
                                                Ex-8


                                                        Cluster-1-1
                                                FAO-5
                                88%

                 79%
                                                203


                                                        Cluster-1-2
        74%                                     C-560


                                                        Cluster-2
                                                C-564

0.70          0.77       0.85         0.93     1.00
                                                                      54
16 F2 individuals representing 4 F2 individuals from
C-560 and 12 from C-564 were compared with F1
hybrids for some morphological attributes.
Both F1 hybrids showed oval bud apex and dark
green leaf colour whereas in F2 individuals both the
traits varied.
Most of the F2 individuals flowered early like their
respective parents.
                                                        55
7    F2   progenies    resembled      P1   parent,   7
intermediate and 2 were P2 type with respect to
branching behavior.
The range of number of nodes on secondary
branch of 4th node and length of secondary branch
of 4th node was 0 to 8 and 0 to 55cm in F2
individuals respectively.
The average of number of primary branches per
plant was 2.5 in all F2 individuals.                      56
Dendrogram was based on 5 monomorphic and 6
  polymorphic bands and generated by using the
  UPGMA algorithm.                      Ex-8
                                                 Cluster-1-1
                                                 (94.1%)
                                        2

                 (85%)
                                        1


                                        3       Cluster-1-2
  (77%)
                                        4


                                        FAO-5    Cluster-2

0.75      0.81           0.88   0.94   1.00

                                                               57
In this combination 2 hybrid viz, 79-1 and 79-2
were produced which were similar for almost all
qualitative traits.

Growth habit, petiole hairiness and axillary bud
in the hybrids were more similar to the female
parent than the male parent.

Hybrids were early flowering, quite similar to
the female parent while male parent flowered late.

                                                     58
Both the hybrids had oval inflorescence apex and

pentafoliate leaves while in the parents it was

elongated trifoliate respectively.

No. of branches, no. of nodes, plant height, leaflet

length, leaflet width, leaflet no. and stipule length were

higher in the hybrids than the parents while rest of the

traits varied among the parents and the hybrids.             59
The genetic similarity was estimated between 4hybrids
      (213, 378, 79-1 & 79-2) along with their parents.
      Based on 14 bands of protein native, dendrogram was
      divided in 2 clusters.
                                                           Ex8
                                                                  Cluster-1-1

                83%
                                                           213    92%

                                                           79-1
                                                           79-2       Cluster-1-2
78%
                                                           Wardan
                                                           378 Cluster-2
             0.80        0.85       0.90      0.95        1.00
                                Coefficient                                     60
12 F2 individuals (11 from 79-1 and 1 from 79-2 hybrid)
successfully survived. The trait, vigour and regeneration
showed variation among the F2 individuals.

A range of 0 to 6 and 0 to 24cm has been found for the
trait, number of nodes on secondary branch of 4th node and
length of secondary branch of 4th node respectively.

7 were similar to male parent for branching behavior and
1 was more close to female parent while 4 were
intermediate among both the parents.

Flowering initiation was quite late in F2 individuals
(ranging from 51 to 119 days) as compared to F1 hybrids
                                                             61
which flowered after 67 days.
4 bulks representing viz., P1 bulk (Wardan

bulk), P1 type bulk (Wardan type plant

progenies), P2 bulk (FAO-5) & P2 type bulk

(FAO-5 type plant progenies) were screened

with 110 RAPD primers.
                                              62
Total primers                                 110
Total amplified primers                       92
Total yielded bands                           623
Monomorhpic bands                             403 (64.68%)
Polymorphic bands                             220 (35.32%)
                      Range of yielded bands
1 band (OPH-1, OPH-8, OPH-15 & OPJ-16) - 14 bands (KITAB-18)
Average of bands/primer                       6.77
Not Amplified                                 18
Monomorphic primers                           17
Polymorphic primers                           75
Primer generate nonspecific bands             46
Primer generate specific bands                29
                                                               63
Fig: Screening of four bulks with twenty-nine RAPD primer
generating specific bands:-




                                                            64
S.No.    Primers                    Specific band no.
  1      OPH-2                     B5 for regeneration
  2      OPH-3      B5 for regeneration and B3 for non-regeneration
  3      OPH-6      Three bands, B3, B9 & B10 for non-regeneration
  4      OPH-7                     B1 for regeneration
  5      OPH-19                  B8 for non-regneration
  6      OPD-2                     B8 for regeneration
  7      OPD-4                     B8 for regeneration
  8      OPD-5       B5 for regeneration, B13 for non-regeneration
  9      OPD-7                  B6 for non-regeneration
 10      OPD-8                     B6 for regeneration
 11      OPD-14                    B4 for regeneration
 12      OPD-19                 B3 for non-regeneration
 13      OPD-20                 B3 &B6 for regeneration
 14     KITAB-4    B2 & B7 for non-regeneration, B8 for regeneration
 15     KITAB-5                    B9 for regeneration
 16     KITAB-7                   B10 for regeneration
 17     KITAB-9                   B3 for regeneration);
 18     KITAB-11   B10 for non-regeneration, B7 & B8 for regeneration
 19     KITAB-12                   B7 for regeneration
 20     KITAB-17                   B2 for regeneration
 21     KITAB-19                   B4 for regeneration
 22      OPE-15                    B1 for regeneration
 23       OPJ-9                    B3 for regeneration
 24       OPJ-7      B2 for non-regeneration, B1 for regeneration
 25      OPJ-13      B3 for non-regeneration, B5 for regeneration
 26      OPJ-17                    B5 for regeneration
 27       OPC-4                    B7 for regeneration
 28      OPC-12                  B4 for non-regeneratio                 65
 29      OPC-20                    B4 for regeneration
Dendogram based on 623 bands generated by 92
       primers was developed.
       The dendrogram showed that the genetic similarity
       among the bulks was quite high, ranging from 87% to
       92%.
                                            P1 bulk
                                                           Sub-cluster 1-1
             88%                            P1 type bulk       (92%)

       87%                                  P2 type bulk   Sub-cluster 1-2


                                            P2 bulkbulk
                                                     Cluster -2



0.85           0.89    0.93      0.96      1.00                        66
Genetic variability was estimated among 24 plants each of Ex-8,
Wardan, FAO-5, BB-3 & BB-2 by using different oligonucleotide primers.

                          Amplified   Monomorphic   Polymorphic
S.No. Ecotype   Primers                                           Range of amplified bands
                          bands       bands         bands


1     Ex-8      12        76          21            55            2-11

                                      27.63%        72.37%        OPD-11 - OPD-2

2     Wardan 13           94          27            67            1-12
                                      28.73%        71.27%        OPD-10 - OPD-2
3     FAO-5     14        85          22            63            2-15
                                      25.88%        74.12%        OPD-12, 15 - OPD-11
4     BB-3      13        79          25            54            3-11
                                      31.65%        68.35%        OPD-13, 14, 16 - OPD-11
5     BB-2      14        115         24            91            3-14
                                      20.87%        79.13%        OPD-12 - OPD-11
                                                                                     67
1
                                                 3
                                                 4 Cluster-1
                                                 6
                                                 2
                                                 5
                                                 7
                                                 10
                                                 13
                                                 11 Cluster-2
                                                 14
                                                 15
                                                 16
                                                 21
                                                 19
                                                 8
                                                 9   Cluster-3
                                                 20
                                                 18
                                                 12
                                                 17
                                                 22
                                                 23 Cluster-4
                                                 24
0.48   0.58      0.69            0.80          0.90
                Coefficient
                                                      1 Cluster-1
                                                      2
                                                      3
                                                      4
                                                      6
                                                      7
                                                      8
                                                      10
                                                      9
                                                      20
                                                      12
                                                      14 Cluster-2
                                                      15
                                                      16
                                                      17
                                                      19
                                                      24
                                                      21
                                                      22
                                                      11
                                                      5
                                                      13
                                                      18 Cluster-3
                                                      23
0.68     0.75       0.81                0.88        0.95           68
                   Coefficient
1 Cluster-1
                                      2
                                      5 Cluster-2
                                      6
                                      7
                                      8
                                      15
                                      16
                                      23
                                      14
                                      17
                                      18
                                      19 Cluster-3
                                      20
                                      21
                                      22
                                      24
                                      9
                                      11
                                      13
                                      10
                                      12
                                      3 Cluster-4
                                      4
0.64    0.71     0.77        0.83   0.90
               Coefficient
                                      1 Cluster-1
                                      2
                                      3
                                      4 Cluster-2
                                      5
                                      11
                                      10
                                      6 Cluster-3
                                      7
                                      8
                                      15
                                      16 Cluster-4
                                      17
                                      13
                                      9
                                      14
                                      12
                                      19 Cluster-5
                                      20
                                      21
                                      22
                                      23 Cluster-6
                                      24
                                      18 Cluster-7
 0.70   0.76    0.81         0.86   0.92         69
               Coefficient
1
                                    2
                                    3
                                    5
                                    4
                                    7
                                    6
                                          Cluster-1
                                    9
                                    10
                                    17
                                    22
                                    21
                                    23
                                    11
                                    18     Cluster-2
                                    8
                                    12
                                    16    Cluster-3
                                    13
                                    19
                                    24     Cluster-4
                                    14
                                    15     Cluster-5
                                    20    Cluster-6
0.64   0.71     0.77        0.83   0.90
              Coefficient


                                                 70
Fig:-RAPD profile of different ecotypes of Berseem.
BB-2 (OPD-11)                              FAO-5 (OPD-11)




FAO-5 (OPD-18)                              BB-2 (OPD-18)




BB-2 (OPD-5)                                Wardan (OPD-11)




Wardan (OPD-18)                              BB-3 (OPD-18)




Wardan (OPD-8)                              BB-3 (OPD-8)




Wardan (OPD-13)



                                                                        71
Genetic variability was calculated among 120 plants
comprising of 24 plants each of 5 genotypes viz., BB-2,
BB-3, Wardan, Ex-8 and FAO-5 by using 13
oligonucleotide primers.
The dendogram showed the presence of 11 main
clusters, which were again divided in total 17 sub-
clusters.
Inter-cluster similarity among 11 clusters was
ranging from 47.0% to 92.0%.                              72
C1
                             C2
                             C3
                             C4
                             C5
                             C11
                             C10
                             C6
                             C7
                             C8
                             C15
                             C16
                             C17
                             C13
                             C9
                             C14
                             C19
                             C20
                             C108
                             C110
                             C111
                             C112
                             C113
                             C115
                             C120
                             C116
                             C117
                             C118
                             C12
                             C101
                             C21
                             C22
                             C23
                             C24
                             C100
                             C102
                             C103
                             C104
                             C106
                             C105
                             C107
                             C97
                             C98
                             C99
                             C38
                             C41
                             C42
                             C43
                             C39
                             C40
                             C47
                             C49
                             C50
                             C51
                             C53
                             C52
                             C55
                             C54
                             C57
                             C58
                             C65
                             C70
                             C69
                             C71
                             C59
                             C66
                             C56
                             C61
                             C67
                             C72
                             C109
                             C114
                             C119
                             C18
                             C68
                             C25
                             C26
                             C27
                             C28
                             C30
                             C33
                             C35
                             C37
                             C34
                             C36
                             C29
                             C60
                             C64
                             C44
                             C45
                             C46
                             C48
                             C31
                             C32
                             C62
                             C63
                             C73
                             C75
                             C77
                             C76
                             C78
                             C79
                             C74
                             C91
                             C80
                             C81
                             C92
                             C84
                             C82
                             C90
                             C85
                             C89
                             C94
                             C83
                             C86
                             C87
                             C88
                             C93
                             C95
                             C96

0.46   0.58   0.70   0.81   0.93
                              73
A total of 38 SSR primer pairs were used to screen for
amplification and polymorphism among 75 accessions
belonging to 24 species of genus Trifolium.
Out of 38 SSR primer pairs, 34 primer pairs amplified
generating 130 polymorphic bands while remaining 4
primer pairs were non-informative.
The number of fragments amplified by individual
primers ranged from 2 to 6. The amplified products size
ranged from 100 bp to 280 bp.
                                                          74
Fig: SSR profile generated by primer PR-27 (433) in 24 species of
                         genus Trifolium:-
    1       2       3       4    5     6       7          8    9       10    11    12    13   14    15   16   17   18   19    20    21    22       23       24   M




1        2          3       4     5       6       7        8       9    10    11    12   13    14   15   16   17   18    19    20    21   22       23        M       24




1       2       3       4    5   6    7       8       9    10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20                    21 22 23 24 M              1    2        3    4   5        M




                                                                                                                                                                          75
The genetic distance between 75 accessions belonging to
24 species was estimated using the dendogram formed by
SAHN agglomerative clustering.
The grouping based on 130 bands showed the presence of
11 main clusters.
Main clusters were further divided in 25 sub-clusters and
4 sub-sub-clusters.
Inter-cluster similarity ranged from 28% to 96% among
11 clusters.
                                                             76
P1
                                    P5
                                    P7
                                    P4
                                    P8
                                    P3
                                    P9
                                    P10
                                    P2
                                    P6
                                    P13
                                    P14
                                    P17   Cluster-1
                                    P18
                                    P15
                                    P16
                                    P19
                                    P20
                                    P23
                                    P21
                                    P24
                                    P11
                                    P22
                                    P56
                                    P57
                                    P33
                                    P35
                                    P32   Cluster-2
                                    P34
                                    P39
                                    P46
                                    P48
                                    P49
                                          Cluster-3
                                    P55
                                    P47   Cluster-4
                                    P27
                                    P53
                                    P54
                                    P58
                                    P59
                                    P60
                                    P29
                                    P71
                                    P72    Cluster-5
                                    P73
                                    P76
                                    P75
                                    P74
                                    P50
                                    P51
                                    P52
                                    P63
                                    P65
                                    P66
                                    P67   Cluster-6
                                    P68
                                    P69
                                    P70
                                    P61   Cluster-7
                                    P62
                                    P25
                                    P26
                                    P28
                                    P30
                                    P31
                                    P40
                                    P41
                                          Cluster-8
                                    P42
                                    P43
                                    P44
                                    P45
                                    P36
                                    P38   Cluster-9
                                    P37   Cluster-10
                                    P64
                                    P12   Cluster-11
0.08   0.31     0.54        0.77   1.00       77
              Coefficient
Cluster   Sub-cluster         Total accessions                                            Species
                                                 T. alexandrinum (Wardan, BB-3, Giza-6, BB-2, Sakha-4, FAO-5, Serw-1, Helaly, Ex-8,
                      1-1-1         14
                                                 Fahli original, EC400976, EC418536, EC539050 & EC539057)
          1-1         1-1-2          2           T. alexandrinum EC539048 and EC539047
                      1-1-3          3           T. alexandrinum (EC539054 & EC418539) and T. clypeatum EC528536
  1
                      1-1-4          2           T. alexandrinum EC418538 and T. dasyurum EC528537
                1-2                  1           T. alexandrinum EC528530
                1-3                  1           T. clypeatum EC511807
                1-4                  2           T. hirtum EC429039 and EC425037
                2-1                  2           T. angustifolium EC539063 and EC425062
  2
                2-2                  3           T. angustifolium (EC539058 & EC539064) and T. glomeratum EC401700
                3-1                  4           T. subterraneum (EC539068, EC401717 & EC539069) and T. pilulare EC528547
  3
                3-2                  1           T. subterraneum EC401718
          4                          1           T. echinatum EC425075
                                                 T. apertum EC401712, T.fragiferum EC528539 and T. vesiculosum (EC401716, EC Ooty &
               5-1                   5
                                                 EC Palampur)
                                                 T. echinatum EC425078, T. lappaceum (EC528542 & EC402165), T. grandiflorum EC528540,
  5            5-2                   6
                                                 T. ligusticum EC528544 and T. balanse EC511775
               5-3                   1           T. diffusum EC528538
               5-4                   3           T. hybridum EC401702 , EC425029 and EC401701
               6-1                   1           T. nigrescence
  6            6-2                   5           T. repens EC400385, EC402155, EC400984, EC400379 and EC401705
               6-3                   1           T. repens EC401706
          7                          2           T. pratense EC400980 & EC400979
               8-1                   3           T. dasyurum EC511808 and T. echinatum (EC425076 & EC425077)
               8-2                   2           T. spumosum EC511781 and EC528549
  8
                                                 T. glomeratum EC405033 and T. resupinatum (EC401715, EC425073, EC425074, EC425072
               8-3                   6
                                                 and EC425071)
           9                         3           T. compestre EC402155, EC425027 & EC425028                                     78
          10                         1           T. repens EC400987
Compatibility between different species is an indication of
close affinity between two species.


In Trifolium, the incompatibility barriers are very strong.
Evans (1962 b) reported the existence of high degree of
incompatibility between species of Trifolium.


The present study is an attempt to know the genetic
similarity among 10 Trifolium species and their relationship
with T. alexandrinum based on compatibility studies.           79
S. No. Female Parent    Male Parent     Obs-1   Obs-2 Obs-3 Obs-4 P-I       P-II   P-III   P-VI   P-V    Observations         Seed
                                                                                                                             Setting
Control T.alexandrinum T.alexandrinum 5hrs     10    1.8    1.7      1.9   1.7    2.4     2.4     1.4    Normal seed         Normal
cross cv Wardan        cv Wardan                                                                         setting
1       T.alexandrinum T.angustifolium 1hr     10    0.2    0.1      0     0      0       0       0      No withering          No
        cv Wardan      EC539058        5hrs    10    1.8    1.5      0.5   0.3    0.3     0.2     0
                                       8hrs    5     0      0        0     0      0       0       0
2       T.alexandrinum T.clypeatum     1hr     5     0.2    0.2      0     0      0       0       0      No withering          No
        EC511781       EC528536        3hrs    5     0      0        0     0      0       0       0
                                       5hrs    5     0      0        0     0      0       0       0
                                       8hrs    5     0      0        0     0      0       0       0
3       T.alexandrinum T.grandiflorum 3hrs     5     0.6    1.2      0     1      0.2     0       0      Withering 2 DAP       No
        cv Wardan      ECEC528540      5hrs    5     0.8    0.8      0     0.2    0.4     0.2     0      & shrivel ovaries
                                       8hrs    5     1.2    2.2      1.6   1.2    1.2     1       0.2
4       T.alexandrinum T. compestre    1hr     5     0.6    0.6      0.4   0      0       0       0      No withering up       No
        cv Wardan      EC5425027       3hrs    5     1.2    0.8      0.8   0.2    0       0       0      to 5 days
                                       5hrs    5     0.8    1.4      0.8   0.4    0.2     0       0
5       T.alexandrinum T .repens       1hr     10    0.9    0.6      0.5   0      0       0       0      No withering          No
        cv Wardan      EC400385        5hrs    11    0.82 0.82 0.6         0.18 0         0       0
6       T.alexandrinum T .ligusticum   1hr     10    0.5    0.6      0.5   0.1    0       0       0      Withering 2 DAP       No
        cv Wardan      EC528544        5hrs    10    1.6    0.5      0.2   0.2    0.4     0.1     0
7       T.alexandrinum T. balansae     1hr     10    1.1    0.6      0     0      0       0       0      No withering          No
        cv Wardan      EC511775        5hrs    10    0.5    0.4      0     0      0       0       0
8       T.alexandrinum T. hirtum       1hr     10    0.3    0.2      0     0      0       0       0      No withering          No
        cv BB-2        EC425039        5hrs    10    0.2    0.4      0.5   0      0       0       0
9       T.alexandrinum T. pilulare     1hr     10    0.2    0.2      0     0      0       0       0      No withering          No
        cv Wardan      EC528547        5hrs    10    0.2    0.3      0.2   0      0       0       0
10      T.alexandrinum T. hybridum     1hr     10    0.2    0.3      0     0      0       0       0      No withering          No
        cv BB-2        EC41702         5hrs    10    1.3    0.3      0.4   0      0       0       0
Obs-1=Flowers harvested after 5hrs          Obs-2=Number of pistils observed.
Obs-3Number of pollen attached (Average). Obs-4=Hairy region of stigma with pollen tubes or pollen germination (Average).
                                                                                                                               80
Fig: Pollen tube growth in different cross combinations


  Control cross (A-J)




                                                           (Wardan) x T. clypeatum EC528536 (K-L)




(Wardan) x T. hirtum
EC425039 (M)
                        (Wardan) x T. angustifolium EC539058 (N-X)




                                                                                                    81
Fig: Pollen tube growth in different cross combinations:-


    (Wardan) x T. balansae EC511775 (A-D)




                                             (Wardan) x T. compestre EC5425027 (E-H)




   (Wardan) x T. ligusticum EC528544 (I-Q)




                                                  (Wardan) x T. repense EC400385 (R-T)




                                                                                         82
Good    mitotic   preparations   with   well   spread
metaphase were studied.
5 cultivars of T. alexandrinum representing 3
ecotypes viz., Mescawi (Wardan, BB-2 & BB-3), Saidi
(Ex-8) and Fahli (FAO-5) were analyzed on the basis
of mitotic preparations.
The number of chromosomes were found to be
2n=16 in Wardan, BB-2, FAO-5 and Ex-8 while in BB-
3, the number of chromosome was 2n=32.                   83
Mitotic preparations of different ecotypes of berseem (T. alexandrinum)
 BB-3          Wardan            BB-2           Ex-8         FAO-5




                                                                     84
85
86
87
88
89

More Related Content

Featured

2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot
2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot
2024 State of Marketing Report – by HubspotMarius Sescu
 
Everything You Need To Know About ChatGPT
Everything You Need To Know About ChatGPTEverything You Need To Know About ChatGPT
Everything You Need To Know About ChatGPTExpeed Software
 
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage Engineerings
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage EngineeringsProduct Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage Engineerings
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage EngineeringsPixeldarts
 
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental Health
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental HealthHow Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental Health
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental HealthThinkNow
 
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdfAI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdfmarketingartwork
 
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024Neil Kimberley
 
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)contently
 
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024Albert Qian
 
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsSocial Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsKurio // The Social Media Age(ncy)
 
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Search Engine Journal
 
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summarySpeakerHub
 
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd Clark Boyd
 
Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next Tessa Mero
 
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentGoogle's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentLily Ray
 
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity -  Best PracticesTime Management & Productivity -  Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity - Best PracticesVit Horky
 
The six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project managementThe six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project managementMindGenius
 
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...RachelPearson36
 

Featured (20)

2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot
2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot
2024 State of Marketing Report – by Hubspot
 
Everything You Need To Know About ChatGPT
Everything You Need To Know About ChatGPTEverything You Need To Know About ChatGPT
Everything You Need To Know About ChatGPT
 
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage Engineerings
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage EngineeringsProduct Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage Engineerings
Product Design Trends in 2024 | Teenage Engineerings
 
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental Health
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental HealthHow Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental Health
How Race, Age and Gender Shape Attitudes Towards Mental Health
 
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdfAI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
AI Trends in Creative Operations 2024 by Artwork Flow.pdf
 
Skeleton Culture Code
Skeleton Culture CodeSkeleton Culture Code
Skeleton Culture Code
 
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
PEPSICO Presentation to CAGNY Conference Feb 2024
 
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
Content Methodology: A Best Practices Report (Webinar)
 
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
How to Prepare For a Successful Job Search for 2024
 
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie InsightsSocial Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
Social Media Marketing Trends 2024 // The Global Indie Insights
 
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
Trends In Paid Search: Navigating The Digital Landscape In 2024
 
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
5 Public speaking tips from TED - Visualized summary
 
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
ChatGPT and the Future of Work - Clark Boyd
 
Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next Getting into the tech field. what next
Getting into the tech field. what next
 
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search IntentGoogle's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
Google's Just Not That Into You: Understanding Core Updates & Search Intent
 
How to have difficult conversations
How to have difficult conversations How to have difficult conversations
How to have difficult conversations
 
Introduction to Data Science
Introduction to Data ScienceIntroduction to Data Science
Introduction to Data Science
 
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity -  Best PracticesTime Management & Productivity -  Best Practices
Time Management & Productivity - Best Practices
 
The six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project managementThe six step guide to practical project management
The six step guide to practical project management
 
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
Beginners Guide to TikTok for Search - Rachel Pearson - We are Tilt __ Bright...
 

Prethesis submission seminar on 9th may 2012

  • 1. 1 1
  • 2. ADVISORY BOARD • CHAIRMAN :- DR. A. K. ROY • MEMBER:- DR. D. R. MALAVIYA • MEMBER:- DR. P. KAUSHAL • MEMBER:- DR. A. CHANDRA • MEMBER:- DR. SURESH KUMAR 2
  • 3. Assessment of molecular genetic diversity among different species of Trifolium and ecotypes of T. alexandrinum.  Study on interspecific/intervarietal compatibility and inheritance of traits like regeneration ability. 3
  • 4. Genus: Trifolium Tourn (L.). • Family: Leguminosae. • Sub-family: Palpilionaceae. • It comprises of 290 annual and perennial herbs commonly called clovers including several cultivated and pasture species of high fodder value. 4
  • 5. The important perennial pasture clover T. repens, T. hybridum, T. pratense and T. ambiguum are widely distributed in the temperate and sub-temperate regions of the world.  The annual types such as T. resupinatum, T. subterraneum and T. alexandrinum are commonly cultivated as winter annuals in the tropical and subtropical regions. 5
  • 6. The genus name Trifolium refers to the distinctive leaves usually composed of three leaflets (trifoliolate).  The Mediterranean region is the centre of diversity of the genus Trifolium (Zohary and Heller, 1984).  Berseem is widely adapted by the farmers of north, northwest, eastern and central India.  Nearly 2 million hectare arable land is under cultivation of Berseem with an average national productivity of 85 t/ha. 6
  • 7. The importance of crop is known for:-  Its high green fodder production (up to 100t/ha).  Its multicut nature (6-7 cuts).  Long duration of green fodder availability (November to April).  High crude protein content (20-24%).  High digestability.  High palatability .  High nitrogen fixation ability. 7
  • 8. 1: Characterization of Trifolium species based on morphology:- 8
  • 9. To incorporate desirable traits like early flowering from Fahli group and regeneration ability from Mescavi group, inter-varietal crosses were attempted among three ecotypes of T. alexandrinum (Berseem) i.e., Mescavi (cv Wardan and BB-2), Saidi (Ex-8) and Fahli (FAO-5).  F1 hybrids were crossed to male parent and female parents to obtain BC1 seed. 9
  • 10. All F1s and their parents, were characterized for 12 qualitative and quantitative traits.  F2 and BC1 populations were characterized for 10 different morphological attributes including metric and non-metric traits. 10
  • 11. Hybrids and their parents were analyzed for esterase and protein native banding pattern along with their parents.  F2 progenies and their respective parents were compared only for esterase isozyme banding pattern. 11
  • 12. BSA (Michelmore et al, 1991) was used to identify RAPD markers linked with regeneration and non- regeneration trait. BC1 population from contrasting parents Wardan (regenerating genotype) & FAO-5 (non regenerating genotype) was developed by backcrossing F1 progenies with Wardan. 4 bulks representing viz., P1 bulk (Wardan bulk), P1 type bulk (Wardan type plant progenies), P2 bulk (FAO- 5) & P2 type bulk (FAO-5 type plant progenies) were prepared and screened with 110 RAPD primers for identification of putative marker linked to regeneration. 12
  • 13. DNA extracted from fresh leaves and PCR reaction carried out as described by Williams (1993). 18 decamer RAPD primers were used in analysis of diversity within and between different ecotypes of T. alexandrinum. 13
  • 14. A total of 38 SSR primer pairs were used to estimate polymorphism among 24 species of genus Trifolium. DNA isolated and PCR reaction was performed in 10µl volume containing template DNA, Taq polymerase enzyme, Taq polymerase buffer, dNTPs, forward and reverse primers. The thermocycle parameters were used as described by Barret (2004) with minor modifications. The PCR products were electrophoresed on 3.3% agarose gel. 14
  • 15. To identify the stages of pre and post fertilization barriers where 3 genotypes of T. alexandrinum (EC511781, Wardan and BB-2) were used as female parent and crosses were made with different Trifolium species. Pollen tube growth was studied at regular interval of 1hr, 3hrs, 5hrs and 8hrs after pollination. The karyotype will be prepared using root –tip mitotic chromosomes studies based on standard root –tip squash method after pretreatment, fixation, hydrolysis and squash method. 15
  • 16.  The metric data was analyzed statistically to group the plants of similar types based on their similarity. Euclidian cluster analysis for grouping of genotypes and Mahalanobis Euclidean2 analysis was used. 16
  • 17. 17
  • 18. Intra and Interspecific variation analyzed in 51 accessions representing 19 species of genus Trifolium. Wide range of variation observed for most of the traits like plant height (19-143.89 cm), number of branches (5.67-55.11), number of node (5.0-16.33) etc. 18
  • 19. S.N. Species Name T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T10 1 T. alexandrinum Mean 6.5 9.56 4.78 0.36 67.28 1.22 3.34 1.06 1.34 6.22 59.57- 2.97- 0.83- 0.93- Range 4.0-8.67 8.33-13.0 3.77-5.7 0.3-0.4 0.93-1.8 6.0-6.67 71.33 4.13 1.47 2.23 SD 1.55 1.73 0.75 0.04 4.08 0.34 0.43 0.22 0.57 0.27 2 T. compestre Mean 55.11 16.11 1.3 0.25 63.22 0.79 1.44 0.8 0.62 8.33 43.33- 14.67- 1.03- 59.67- 0.43- 0.73- Range 0.2-0.27 1.3-1.53 0.6-0.67 12-Jun 62.67 17.67 1.47 67.33 1.33 0.83 SD 10.34 1.5 0.24 0.04 3.86 0.48 0.13 0.06 0.04 3.21 3 T. apertum Mean 9.67 16.33 4.17 0.47 90.33 1.23 2.83 0.8 1.9 7.33 Range 8.0-11.00 19-Dec 4.0-4.5 0.4-0.5 87-93 1.2-1.3 2.5-3.1 0.8-0.8 1.7-2 8-Jun SD 1.53 3.79 0.29 0.06 3.06 0.06 0.31 0 0.17 1.15 4 T.angustifolium Mean 17.5 9.5 2.35 0.315 57.415 1.62 3.83 0.7 2.7 8.5 1.27- 3.63- 0.47- 7.67- Range 9.67-25.33 7.33-11.67 1.9-2.8 0.23-0.4 19.83-95 2.6-2.8 1.97 4.03 0.93 9.33 SD 11.07 3.07 0.64 0.12 53.15 0.49 0.28 0.33 0.14 1.17 5 T. spumosum Mean 5.67 5 1.37 0.25 19 2.79 1.12 0.99 1.04 6.17 1.17- 0.23- 15.33- 2.67- 1.10- 0.97- Range 5.33-6.00 4.67-5.33 1.0-1.07 6.0-6.33 1.57 0.27 22.67 2.90 1.13 1.00 SD 0.47 0.47 0.28 0.03 5.19 0.16 0.02 0.02 0.05 0.23 6 T. diffusum Mean 10 11 2.27 0.27 49.33 1.33 2.1 0.77 1.6 4 Range 10-Oct 12-Oct 2.0-2.5 0.2-0.3 45-53 1.3-1.4 2.0-2.2 0.7-0.8 1.5-1.7 4-Apr SD 0 1 0.25 0.06 4.04 0.06 0.1 0.06 0.1 0 7 T. grandiflorum Mean 5.67 7.67 2.2 0.2 57 0.37 1.77 0.83 0.8 6 Range 6-May 9-Jul 2.0-2.4 0.2-0.2 46-68 0.3-0.4 1.6-2 0.8-0.9 0.8-0.8 6-Jun SD 0.58 1.15 0.2 0 11 0.06 0.21 0.06 0 19 0
  • 20. 8 T. hirtum Mean 11.33 6.5 1.1 0.25 32.33 1.97 1.55 1.115 1 6 10.33- 31.33- Range 6.33-6.67 1.03-1.17 0.23-0.27 1.97-1.97 1.5-1.6 1.1-1.13 0.93-1.07 6-Jun 12.33 33.33 SD 1.41 0.24 0.1 0.03 1.41 0 0.07 0.02 0.1 0 9 T. echinatum Mean 16.93 10.93 2.87 0.31 91.67 0.45 1.85 1.01 1.07 6.07 11.33- Range 7.33-12.33 1.77-5.07 0.3-0.33 81-105 0.3-0.77 1.73-1.97 0.93-1.23 1-1.2 5.33-7.33 25.67 SD 6.62 2.07 1.39 0.01 9 0.19 0.09 0.13 0.08 0.76 10 T. repens Mean 15.96 13.92 1.89 0.24 71.38 5.51 1.53 1.16 0.94 11.58 13.67- 13.33- Range 1.67-2.37 0.2-0.27 62.33-76 4.1-6.98 1.33-1.72 1.0-1.33 0.87-1 9.33-15 18.83 15.17 SD 2.4 0.85 0.33 0.03 6.24 1.2 0.18 0.13 0.06 2.55 11 T .hybridum Mean 12.33 10.78 1.61 0.34 84.45 2.62 2.49 1.48 1.66 5.33 Max 15.33 12 1.7 0.37 91.67 2.83 2.5 1.57 1.77 6 Mini 10.67 9.33 1.43 0.33 76 2.47 2.47 1.4 1.57 4.67 SD 2.6 1.35 0.16 0.02 7.91 0.19 0.02 0.09 0.1 0.67 12 T. resupinatum Mean 11.39 13.89 2.28 0.47 143.89 1.93 1.98 1.1 0.96 4.56 12.67- 89.0- Range 8.67-13.67 2.13-2.7 0.37-0.57 1.57-2.27 1.67-2.23 0.87-1.3 0.83-1.03 4.0-6.67 15.33 193.33 SD 1.81 1.15 0.21 0.09 41.32 0.29 0.2 0.19 0.08 1.07 20
  • 21. 13 T. subterraneum Mean 27.67 13.67 1.55 0.28 61.33 1.66 1.01 0.82 0.59 6.89 25.67- 12.33- Range 0.50-2.17 0.23-0.30 24.0-81.00 0.83-2.07 0.87-1.13 0.77-0.90 0.37-0.70 2.0-10.00 29.67 16.00 SD 2 2.03 0.91 0.04 32.35 0.72 0.13 0.07 0.19 4.29 T .pilulare Mean 15.67 14 2.2 0.27 60.33 0.33 0.97 0.8 0.37 7 14 Range 10.0-24.0 13.0-15.0 1.90-2.50 0.20-0.30 54.0-65.0 0.30-0.40 0.90-1.0 0.70-0.90 0.30-0.50 6.0-8.0 SD 7.37 1 0.3 0.06 5.69 0.06 0.06 0.1 0.12 1 15 T. balansae Mean 8.33 10 2.67 0.2 61.33 0.37 1.7 0.67 0.97 6 Range 6.0-11.00 9.0-11.00 2.5-2.90 0.20-0.20 52.0-70.00 0.30-0.50 1.70-1.70 0.60-0.70 0.90-1.10 6.0-6.00 SD 2.52 1 0.21 0 9.02 0.12 0 0.06 0.12 0 16 T .ligusticum Mean 7 11.33 2.33 0.27 67.33 0.3 1.9 0.87 1.03 6.67 Range 7-Jul 12-Nov 2.0-2.7 0.2-0.3 60-77 0.2-0.4 1.7-2.1 0.7-1 0.9-1.1 6.0-8 SD 0 0.58 0.35 0.06 8.74 0.1 0.2 0.15 0.12 1.15 17 T. lappaceum Mean 18.34 12.17 2.18 0.3 84.5 0.37 1.72 0.85 0.9 7.34 79.67- Range 15.67-21 11.0-13.33 2.13-2.23 0.3-0.3 0.37-0.37 1.67-1.77 0.83-0.87 0.87-0.93 6.67-8 89.33 SD 3.77 1.65 0.07 0 6.83 0 0.07 0.03 0.04 0.94 18 T. clypeatum Mean 10.5 7.335 3.75 0.47 83.335 5.5 2.635 2.03 1.935 8 Range 9.33-11.67 7.0-7.67 3.67-3.83 0.47-0.47 82.0-84.67 5.47-5.53 2.5-2.77 2.03-2.03 1.97-1.97 8-Aug SD 1.65 0.47 0.11 0 1.89 0.04 0.19 0 0.05 0 19 T. dasyrum Mean 47.5 6.335 1.685 0.335 54.835 1.6 2.32 0.985 1.83 4.335 35.33- Range 6.0-6.67 1.4-1.97 0.3-0.37 49.67-60 1.17-2.03 2.17-2.47 0.9-1.07 1.63-2.03 4.0-4.67 59.67 SD 17.21 0.47 0.4 0.05 7.3 0.61 0.21 0.12 0.28 0.47 T1-No.of Branch T2-No of Node T3-Internodal Length Total Accession=48 T4-Stem Diameter T5-Height./ Rossete Diameter T6-Petiole Length Total Species=19 T7-Leaflet Length T8-Leaflet Width T9-Stipule Length T10-No. of Veins on Stipule 21
  • 22. 0 2 3 4 5 6 1 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 T.alexandrinum T.alexandrinum T.compestre T.compestre T.apertum T.apertum T.angusti T.angusti T.spumosum T.spumosum T.diffusum T.diffusum T.grandiflorum T.grandiflorum T.hirtum T.hirtum T.echinatum T.echinatum T.repens T.repens T.hybridum T.hybridum No. of branches T.resupinatum T.resupinatum T.subterraneum T.subterraneum Internodal length T.pilulare T.pilulare T.balansae T.balansae T.ligusticum T.ligusticum T.lappaceum T.lappaceum T.clypeatum T.clypeatum T. dasyrum T. dasyrum 0 2 6 8 4 10 12 14 16 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 T.alexandrinum T.alexandrinum T.compestre T.compestre T.apertum T.apertum T.angusti T.angusti T.spumosum T.spumosum T.diffusum T.diffusum T.grandiflorum T.grandiflorum T.hirtum T.hirtum T.echinatum T.echinatum T.repens T.repens Stem diameter T.hybridum T.hybridum No. of nodes T.resupinatum T.resupinatum T.subterraneum T.subterraneum T.pilulare T.pilulare T.balansae T.balansae T.ligusticum T.ligusticum T.lappaceum T.lappaceum 22 T.clypeatum T.clypeatum T. dasyrum T. dasyrum
  • 23. 1 1 2 3 3 4 5 0 2 4 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 T.alexandrinum T.compestre T.alexandrinum T.apertum T.compestre T.angusti T.apertum T.spumosum T.angusti T.diffusum T.spumosum T.grandiflorum T.diffusum T.grandiflorum T.hirtum T.hirtum T.echinatum T.echinatum T.repens T.repens Plant height T.hybridum T.hybridum T.resupinatum T.resupinatum Leaflet length T.subterraneum T.subterraneum T.pilulare T.pilulare T.balansae T.balansae T.ligusticum T.ligusticum T.lappaceum T.lappaceum T.clypeatum T.clypeatum T. dasyrum T. dasyrum 0 3 4 5 6 1 2 0 1 1 2 2 3 T.alexandrinum T.alexandrinum T.compestre T.compestre T.apertum T.apertum T.angusti T.angusti T.spumosum T.spumosum T.diffusum T.diffusum T.grandiflorum T.grandiflorum T.hirtum T.hirtum Petiole length T.echinatum T.echinatum T.repens T.repens Leaflet width T.hybridum T.hybridum T.resupinatum T.resupinatum T.subterraneum T.subterraneum T.pilulare T.pilulare T.balansae T.balansae T.ligusticum T.ligusticum T.lappaceum T.lappaceum 23 T.clypeatum T.clypeatum T. dasyrum T. dasyrum
  • 24. 0 1 1 2 2 3 3 T.alexandrinum T.compestre T.apertum T.angusti T.spumosum T.diffusum T.grandiflorum T.hirtum T.echinatum T.repens T.hybridum T.resupinatum T.subterraneum T.pilulare Stipule length T.balansae T.ligusticum T.lappaceum T.clypeatum T. dasyrum 0 2 6 8 10 12 14 4 T.alexandrinum T.compestre T.apertum T.angusti T.spumosum T.diffusum T.grandiflorum T.hirtum T.echinatum T.repens T.hybridum T.resupinatum T.subterraneum T.pilulare No. of veins on stipule T.balansae T.ligusticum T.lappaceum T.clypeatum 24 T. dasyrum
  • 25. Wide variation was recorded for various qualitative traits among the species studied. Growth habit:- Most of the Trifolium species were prostrate in nature while T. alexandrinum showed erect or semi-erect growth habit. Flowering period: T. clypeatum and T. dasyrum flowered in 2nd week of February while T. hybridum EC425029 followed by T. diffusum EC528538 flowered in 1st week of May. Most of the species flowered in the month of March. 25
  • 26. Fig: Variation for growth habit in Trifolium species. 26
  • 27. Petiole hairiness: varied from hairy to non hairy. T. spumosum and T. resupinatum had non hairy or glabrous petiole while dense hairs in few species viz., T. diffusum, T. hirtum, T. pilulare, T. balansae, T. clypeatum and T. alexandrinum EC539057. Leaflet hairiness:- Hairy or dense hairy leaflets were found in most of the species viz., T. apertum, T. angustifolium, T. diffusum, T. hirtum, T. balansae and T. dasyrum but species like T. spumosum, T. repens, T. hybridum and T. resupinatum had non hairy or glabrous leaflets. 27
  • 28. Leaflet apex shape:- Round leaflet apex was found to be common however the species such as T. apertum, T. angustifolium, T. resupinatum, T. pilulare and T. dasyrum had only tapering leaflet apex. Leaf shape:-This trait varied from lanceolate, oval, ovate, elongated, obovate, to rhomboid where lanceolate leaf shape was seen predominantly. 28
  • 29. Fig: Variation for leaf shape & leaf margin in different species of genus Trifolium. 29
  • 30. Leaflet margin:-Leaflet had either serrate or entire where entire margin was quite frequent. Inflorescence apex shape:- Round was observed to be predominant with some conical or tapering apex. Flower colour:- A wide range of variation has been observed for flower colour which varied from white to dark purple colour, white flower (in 15 accessions) was most common among the species followed by light pink flower (in 14 accessions). 30
  • 31. Fig: Variation for flower colour in different species of genus Trifolium. 31
  • 32. T. compestre, had yellow flower and T. clypeatum, T. hirtum, T. echinatum had flowers with white + pink petals. Flowers of T. clypeatum were largest in size as compared to other species. 32
  • 33. 51 accessions of 19 Trifolium species were grouped into 7 clusters based on similarities of Mahalanobis’s D2 values. Cluster-1 was the largest cluster with 30 accessions followed by cluster-2 comprising of 8 accessions, cluster-4 comprising of 6 accessions and cluster-3 comprising of 4 accessions. Cluster-5 (T. alexandrinum EC418538), 6 (T. angustifolium EC539064) & 7 (T. angustifolium EC539058) were monotypic. 33
  • 34. Cluster No. of accessions Species Name No. per cluster 1 30 T.echinatum EC425075, EC425076, T.lappaceum EC402165, T.echinatum EC425078, T.ligusticum EC528544, T.lappaceum EC528542, T.resupinatum EC425071, T.echinatum EC425077, T.balansae EC511775, T.grandiflorum EC528540, T.resupinatum EC425072, T.hybridum EC425029, EC401702, T.hirtum EC425037, EC425039, T.hybridum EC401701, T.pilulare EC528544, T.diffusum EC528538, T.subterraneum EC401717, T.spumosum EC528549, EC518781, T.repens EC400984, T. dasyrum EC511808, T.subterraneum EC401718, T.echinatum EC401714, T.subterraneum EC539068, T.alexandrinum EC528530, EC539057, EC511781 & EC400773 2 8 T.clypeatum EC511807, EC528536, T.repens EC402155 A, EC400385 B, EC400987 A, EC402155 B, EC400987 B & EC400385 A 3 4 T.compestre EC425028, EC5425027, EC402155 & T. dasyrum EC528537 4 6 T.resupinatum EC425036, EC425074, EC425073, EC401715, T.apertum EC401712 & T.alexandrinum EC400976 5 1 T.alexandrinum EC418538 6 1 T.angustifolium EC539064 7 1 T.angustifolium EC539058 Total clusters=7 Total Accession=51 Total species=19 34
  • 35. Table:2 Mahalanobis Euclidean2 Cluster Distances (Genetic distance) based on Tocher’s clustering method between nineteen Trifolium species:- Cluster-1 Cluster-2 Cluster-3 Cluster-4 Cluster-5 Cluster-6 Cluster-7 Cluster-1 90.49 218.94 226.45 199.94 202.83 265.53 432.91 Cluster-2 98.92 301.67 288.95 409.07 424.08 728.9 Cluster-3 107.35 402.47 440.78 341.85 545.03 Cluster-4 166.62 289.35 331.88 641.07 Cluster-5 0 104.94 187.68 Cluster-6 0 145.47 Cluster-7 0 35
  • 36. Table:3 Clusters mean value for 10 quantitative characters in 7 clusters based on morphological variations in 19 Trifolium species:- No. of No. of Internodal Stem Ht./ Rossete Petiole Leaflet Leaflet Stipule No. of Veins Branch Node length Diameter Diameter Length Length Width Length on Stipule Cluster-1 14.17 10.52 2.37 0.3 67.87 1.38 1.88 0.98 1.07 6.10 Cluster-2 15.00 12.33 2.41 0.31 76.63 5.86 1.86 1.42 1.18 11.25 Cluster-3 56.25 13.58 1.47 0.28 62.42 1.10 1.70 0.87 0.98 7.25 Cluster-4 9.94 13.61 3.21 0.49 139.39 1.68 2.46 1.12 1.10 5.44 Cluster-5 4.00 9.33 4.00 0.30 59.67 1.80 4.13 1.47 2.23 6.00 Cluster-6 25.33 11.67 2.80 0.40 95.00 1.97 3.63 0.93 2.28 7.67 Cluster-7 9.67 7.33 1.90 0.23 19.83 1.27 4.03 0.47 2.60 9.33 36
  • 37. F1 hybrid: 5 hybrids (named as C-552-1, C-552-2, C- 552-3, 380 and 468) were produced. Hybrid varied from parents for growth habit, axillary bud, flowering initiation, leaf wrinkles and most of the quantitative traits which confirmed the hybridity. 37
  • 38. The similarity was estimated between 5 hybrids of Wardan x FAO-5 combinations & their parents using the Jaccard similarity matrix based on total 20 bands of esterase (10 bands) and native protein (10 bands). Wardan 71% Cluster-1 468 (79%) C-552-2 Sub-cluster-2-1 C-552-1 (83%) 78% Sub-cluster-2-2 76% FAO5 C-552-3 Cluster-3 (85%) 380 0.70 0.77 0.85 0.93 1.00 38
  • 39. Fig:- Morphological variation in different intervarietal hybrids. 39
  • 40. Fig:- Morphological variation in different intervarietal hybrids. 40
  • 41. Only 3 F1 hybrid i.e., C-552-1, C-552-2 and 380 successfully survived and produced 23 F2 individuals representing 9 F2 individuals of C-552-1, 12 of C-552-2 and 2 of 380 survived. These 23 F2 individuals were evaluated for morphological characterization. All F2 individuals showed segregation of traits. 41
  • 42. In general, these F2 individuals were less vigorous then F1s. All F2 individuals showed different vigour and regeneration. Out of 23 F2 individuals, 7 were intermediate between the parents, 7 were P1 type (female type branching) however remaining 9 individuals were significantly more close to male parent (P2) regarding flowering and branching. F2 individuals, showed significant variation for days to flower initiation ranging from 62 to 100 days as compared to early flowering (66 to 70 days) in F1 hybrids. 42
  • 43. 9 F2 progenies of this combination including their respective parents were analyzed for esterase isozyme system.  Dendrogram generated, based on 11 polymorphic and 1 monomorphic band, divided the progenies in 3 clusters. Wardan Cluster-1 1 (72%) 2 5 FAO-5 Cluster-2 9 7 (72%) 3 6 Cluster-3 8 4 43 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00
  • 44. The genetic similarity was estimated between 11 F2 progenies of hybrid C-552-1 and their parents using the Jaccard similarity matrix. Dendrogram revealed presence of 3 main clusters. Wardan Cluster-1 1 2 (62.1 %) 3 8 10 4 Cluster-2 5 (66.4% to 100%) 6 FAO-5 7 (61%) 11 9 Cluster-3 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 1.00 44
  • 45.  33 BC1 plants were survived and evaluated for different morphological attributes.  For general vigour, BC1 plants were significantly similar to F2 plants. The days to flowering ranged from 66 to 70 days with an average of 67.33 days in F1 hybrids while in F2 and BC1 plants, it was 62 to 100 (average 80.78) and 82 to 98 days (average 89.24) respectively. The traits like early flowering, dense secondary branching and leaf wrinkles were noticed in F1 hybrids as in Fahli group (male parent). These traits were more prominent in BC1 plants as compared to F2 plants. 45
  • 46. Only 7 BC1 plants survived successfully and were evaluated for various morphological traits. Vigour of BC1 plants was quite similar to F2 plants.  The broad range for the character days to flowering initiation was recorded in F2 plants ranging from 62 to 100 days. It was quite contrasting to BC1 plants, where days to flowering ranged from 97 to 100 days and quite similar to P1 female parent (Wardan) showing a range of 90 to 94 days. In P2 male parent (FAO-5) days to flowering initiation was between 62 to 64 days whereas in F1 hybrids the range was 66 to 91 days. 46
  • 47. The regeneration was the characteristic feature of female parent P1 (Wardan) segregated in F2 plants (three poor, thirteen medium good and seven good regeneration) as well as in BC1 plants (two good, two medium good and two very good regeneration). F1 hybrids showed dense branching and early flowering while BC1 plants did not show early flowering and dense branching, showing their closeness to P1 parent (Female: Wardan). 47
  • 48. BB-2 x FAO-5 Combination:- In this combination 4 hybrid plants numbered as C- 579-1, C-579-2, 482 and C-10 were produced. These hybrids varied significantly for all qualitative traits except leaflet margin which was entire in all the hybrids.  However, semi-erect growth habit, hairy leaflet and dense hairy stipule pubescence were similar in C-579-1, C-579-2 and 482, while C-10 had erect growth, dense hairy leaflet and hairy stipule. Traits like petiole hairiness, leaflet apex shape and leaflet colour were similar in all the hybrids except C- 579-1. Variation was observed for quantitative traits among the hybrids. 48
  • 49. Biochemical characterization of BB-2 x FAO-5 hybrids 4 hybrids of BB-2 x FAO-5 were analyzed for native protein banding pattern along with parents. The dendrogram based on 11 bands of native protein was divided in 3 main clusters. BB-2 Sub-cluster 1-1 C-579-1 C-579-2 Sub-cluster 1-2 (88%) C-10 Cluster -2 (100%) FAO-5 (74%) 482 Cluster -3 0.70 0.77 0.85 0.93 1.00 49
  • 50. 7 F2 individuals representing 5 F2 individuals of C-10 hybrid and 2 F2 individuals of hybrid 482 survived successfully. F2 progenies also differed for regeneration (one very good, four good and two medium). Flowering initiation was similar in F1 hybrids and F2 individuals. 50
  • 51. 3 resembled male parent, 1 individual had male type of high secondary branching and 1 individual was maternal type having less secondary branches whereas 1 individual was intermediate among both the parents. 51
  • 52. Similarity among F2 populations of BB- 2 x FAO-5 UPGMA dendrogram was formed on the basis of 15 scorable bands of esterase isozyme in 7 F2 progenies and their parents . The population was divided in 2 main clusters; cluster-1 was comparatively larger where intra-cluster similarity ranged from 66% to 100%. BB-2 6 Sub-Cluster-1-1 7 (66%-100%) 1 4 Sub-Cluster-1-2 5 (55%) 2 Sub-Cluster-1-3 3 FAO-5 Cluster-2 0.50 0.63 0.75 0.88 1.00 52
  • 53. Ex-8 x FAO-5 combination  3 hybrid were obtained and named as C-560, C-564 and 203 which were similar for qualitative traits like leaflet margin, leaflet shape, leaflet apex shape, leaflet colour, stipule pubescence and flower colour.  The hybrid C-560 was more similar to hybrid C-564 than hybrid 203 for qualitative traits.  The hybrid C-564 was more vigorous having higher values than other hybrids and the parents for most of the quantitative traits.  On comparing the hybrids with parents, it was observed that leaflet margin, leaflet shape, axillary bud and flower colour were similar among the parents and the hybrids while rest of the qualitative traits varied. 53
  • 54. The dendrogram was based on 24 bands representing 10 bands of esterase and 14 bands of protein native. Ex-8 Cluster-1-1 FAO-5 88% 79% 203 Cluster-1-2 74% C-560 Cluster-2 C-564 0.70 0.77 0.85 0.93 1.00 54
  • 55. 16 F2 individuals representing 4 F2 individuals from C-560 and 12 from C-564 were compared with F1 hybrids for some morphological attributes. Both F1 hybrids showed oval bud apex and dark green leaf colour whereas in F2 individuals both the traits varied. Most of the F2 individuals flowered early like their respective parents. 55
  • 56. 7 F2 progenies resembled P1 parent, 7 intermediate and 2 were P2 type with respect to branching behavior. The range of number of nodes on secondary branch of 4th node and length of secondary branch of 4th node was 0 to 8 and 0 to 55cm in F2 individuals respectively. The average of number of primary branches per plant was 2.5 in all F2 individuals. 56
  • 57. Dendrogram was based on 5 monomorphic and 6 polymorphic bands and generated by using the UPGMA algorithm. Ex-8 Cluster-1-1 (94.1%) 2 (85%) 1 3 Cluster-1-2 (77%) 4 FAO-5 Cluster-2 0.75 0.81 0.88 0.94 1.00 57
  • 58. In this combination 2 hybrid viz, 79-1 and 79-2 were produced which were similar for almost all qualitative traits. Growth habit, petiole hairiness and axillary bud in the hybrids were more similar to the female parent than the male parent. Hybrids were early flowering, quite similar to the female parent while male parent flowered late. 58
  • 59. Both the hybrids had oval inflorescence apex and pentafoliate leaves while in the parents it was elongated trifoliate respectively. No. of branches, no. of nodes, plant height, leaflet length, leaflet width, leaflet no. and stipule length were higher in the hybrids than the parents while rest of the traits varied among the parents and the hybrids. 59
  • 60. The genetic similarity was estimated between 4hybrids (213, 378, 79-1 & 79-2) along with their parents. Based on 14 bands of protein native, dendrogram was divided in 2 clusters. Ex8 Cluster-1-1 83% 213 92% 79-1 79-2 Cluster-1-2 78% Wardan 378 Cluster-2 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 Coefficient 60
  • 61. 12 F2 individuals (11 from 79-1 and 1 from 79-2 hybrid) successfully survived. The trait, vigour and regeneration showed variation among the F2 individuals. A range of 0 to 6 and 0 to 24cm has been found for the trait, number of nodes on secondary branch of 4th node and length of secondary branch of 4th node respectively. 7 were similar to male parent for branching behavior and 1 was more close to female parent while 4 were intermediate among both the parents. Flowering initiation was quite late in F2 individuals (ranging from 51 to 119 days) as compared to F1 hybrids 61 which flowered after 67 days.
  • 62. 4 bulks representing viz., P1 bulk (Wardan bulk), P1 type bulk (Wardan type plant progenies), P2 bulk (FAO-5) & P2 type bulk (FAO-5 type plant progenies) were screened with 110 RAPD primers. 62
  • 63. Total primers 110 Total amplified primers 92 Total yielded bands 623 Monomorhpic bands 403 (64.68%) Polymorphic bands 220 (35.32%) Range of yielded bands 1 band (OPH-1, OPH-8, OPH-15 & OPJ-16) - 14 bands (KITAB-18) Average of bands/primer 6.77 Not Amplified 18 Monomorphic primers 17 Polymorphic primers 75 Primer generate nonspecific bands 46 Primer generate specific bands 29 63
  • 64. Fig: Screening of four bulks with twenty-nine RAPD primer generating specific bands:- 64
  • 65. S.No. Primers Specific band no. 1 OPH-2 B5 for regeneration 2 OPH-3 B5 for regeneration and B3 for non-regeneration 3 OPH-6 Three bands, B3, B9 & B10 for non-regeneration 4 OPH-7 B1 for regeneration 5 OPH-19 B8 for non-regneration 6 OPD-2 B8 for regeneration 7 OPD-4 B8 for regeneration 8 OPD-5 B5 for regeneration, B13 for non-regeneration 9 OPD-7 B6 for non-regeneration 10 OPD-8 B6 for regeneration 11 OPD-14 B4 for regeneration 12 OPD-19 B3 for non-regeneration 13 OPD-20 B3 &B6 for regeneration 14 KITAB-4 B2 & B7 for non-regeneration, B8 for regeneration 15 KITAB-5 B9 for regeneration 16 KITAB-7 B10 for regeneration 17 KITAB-9 B3 for regeneration); 18 KITAB-11 B10 for non-regeneration, B7 & B8 for regeneration 19 KITAB-12 B7 for regeneration 20 KITAB-17 B2 for regeneration 21 KITAB-19 B4 for regeneration 22 OPE-15 B1 for regeneration 23 OPJ-9 B3 for regeneration 24 OPJ-7 B2 for non-regeneration, B1 for regeneration 25 OPJ-13 B3 for non-regeneration, B5 for regeneration 26 OPJ-17 B5 for regeneration 27 OPC-4 B7 for regeneration 28 OPC-12 B4 for non-regeneratio 65 29 OPC-20 B4 for regeneration
  • 66. Dendogram based on 623 bands generated by 92 primers was developed. The dendrogram showed that the genetic similarity among the bulks was quite high, ranging from 87% to 92%. P1 bulk Sub-cluster 1-1 88% P1 type bulk (92%) 87% P2 type bulk Sub-cluster 1-2 P2 bulkbulk Cluster -2 0.85 0.89 0.93 0.96 1.00 66
  • 67. Genetic variability was estimated among 24 plants each of Ex-8, Wardan, FAO-5, BB-3 & BB-2 by using different oligonucleotide primers. Amplified Monomorphic Polymorphic S.No. Ecotype Primers Range of amplified bands bands bands bands 1 Ex-8 12 76 21 55 2-11 27.63% 72.37% OPD-11 - OPD-2 2 Wardan 13 94 27 67 1-12 28.73% 71.27% OPD-10 - OPD-2 3 FAO-5 14 85 22 63 2-15 25.88% 74.12% OPD-12, 15 - OPD-11 4 BB-3 13 79 25 54 3-11 31.65% 68.35% OPD-13, 14, 16 - OPD-11 5 BB-2 14 115 24 91 3-14 20.87% 79.13% OPD-12 - OPD-11 67
  • 68. 1 3 4 Cluster-1 6 2 5 7 10 13 11 Cluster-2 14 15 16 21 19 8 9 Cluster-3 20 18 12 17 22 23 Cluster-4 24 0.48 0.58 0.69 0.80 0.90 Coefficient 1 Cluster-1 2 3 4 6 7 8 10 9 20 12 14 Cluster-2 15 16 17 19 24 21 22 11 5 13 18 Cluster-3 23 0.68 0.75 0.81 0.88 0.95 68 Coefficient
  • 69. 1 Cluster-1 2 5 Cluster-2 6 7 8 15 16 23 14 17 18 19 Cluster-3 20 21 22 24 9 11 13 10 12 3 Cluster-4 4 0.64 0.71 0.77 0.83 0.90 Coefficient 1 Cluster-1 2 3 4 Cluster-2 5 11 10 6 Cluster-3 7 8 15 16 Cluster-4 17 13 9 14 12 19 Cluster-5 20 21 22 23 Cluster-6 24 18 Cluster-7 0.70 0.76 0.81 0.86 0.92 69 Coefficient
  • 70. 1 2 3 5 4 7 6 Cluster-1 9 10 17 22 21 23 11 18 Cluster-2 8 12 16 Cluster-3 13 19 24 Cluster-4 14 15 Cluster-5 20 Cluster-6 0.64 0.71 0.77 0.83 0.90 Coefficient 70
  • 71. Fig:-RAPD profile of different ecotypes of Berseem. BB-2 (OPD-11) FAO-5 (OPD-11) FAO-5 (OPD-18) BB-2 (OPD-18) BB-2 (OPD-5) Wardan (OPD-11) Wardan (OPD-18) BB-3 (OPD-18) Wardan (OPD-8) BB-3 (OPD-8) Wardan (OPD-13) 71
  • 72. Genetic variability was calculated among 120 plants comprising of 24 plants each of 5 genotypes viz., BB-2, BB-3, Wardan, Ex-8 and FAO-5 by using 13 oligonucleotide primers. The dendogram showed the presence of 11 main clusters, which were again divided in total 17 sub- clusters. Inter-cluster similarity among 11 clusters was ranging from 47.0% to 92.0%. 72
  • 73. C1 C2 C3 C4 C5 C11 C10 C6 C7 C8 C15 C16 C17 C13 C9 C14 C19 C20 C108 C110 C111 C112 C113 C115 C120 C116 C117 C118 C12 C101 C21 C22 C23 C24 C100 C102 C103 C104 C106 C105 C107 C97 C98 C99 C38 C41 C42 C43 C39 C40 C47 C49 C50 C51 C53 C52 C55 C54 C57 C58 C65 C70 C69 C71 C59 C66 C56 C61 C67 C72 C109 C114 C119 C18 C68 C25 C26 C27 C28 C30 C33 C35 C37 C34 C36 C29 C60 C64 C44 C45 C46 C48 C31 C32 C62 C63 C73 C75 C77 C76 C78 C79 C74 C91 C80 C81 C92 C84 C82 C90 C85 C89 C94 C83 C86 C87 C88 C93 C95 C96 0.46 0.58 0.70 0.81 0.93 73
  • 74. A total of 38 SSR primer pairs were used to screen for amplification and polymorphism among 75 accessions belonging to 24 species of genus Trifolium. Out of 38 SSR primer pairs, 34 primer pairs amplified generating 130 polymorphic bands while remaining 4 primer pairs were non-informative. The number of fragments amplified by individual primers ranged from 2 to 6. The amplified products size ranged from 100 bp to 280 bp. 74
  • 75. Fig: SSR profile generated by primer PR-27 (433) in 24 species of genus Trifolium:- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 M 24 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 M 1 2 3 4 5 M 75
  • 76. The genetic distance between 75 accessions belonging to 24 species was estimated using the dendogram formed by SAHN agglomerative clustering. The grouping based on 130 bands showed the presence of 11 main clusters. Main clusters were further divided in 25 sub-clusters and 4 sub-sub-clusters. Inter-cluster similarity ranged from 28% to 96% among 11 clusters. 76
  • 77. P1 P5 P7 P4 P8 P3 P9 P10 P2 P6 P13 P14 P17 Cluster-1 P18 P15 P16 P19 P20 P23 P21 P24 P11 P22 P56 P57 P33 P35 P32 Cluster-2 P34 P39 P46 P48 P49 Cluster-3 P55 P47 Cluster-4 P27 P53 P54 P58 P59 P60 P29 P71 P72 Cluster-5 P73 P76 P75 P74 P50 P51 P52 P63 P65 P66 P67 Cluster-6 P68 P69 P70 P61 Cluster-7 P62 P25 P26 P28 P30 P31 P40 P41 Cluster-8 P42 P43 P44 P45 P36 P38 Cluster-9 P37 Cluster-10 P64 P12 Cluster-11 0.08 0.31 0.54 0.77 1.00 77 Coefficient
  • 78. Cluster Sub-cluster Total accessions Species T. alexandrinum (Wardan, BB-3, Giza-6, BB-2, Sakha-4, FAO-5, Serw-1, Helaly, Ex-8, 1-1-1 14 Fahli original, EC400976, EC418536, EC539050 & EC539057) 1-1 1-1-2 2 T. alexandrinum EC539048 and EC539047 1-1-3 3 T. alexandrinum (EC539054 & EC418539) and T. clypeatum EC528536 1 1-1-4 2 T. alexandrinum EC418538 and T. dasyurum EC528537 1-2 1 T. alexandrinum EC528530 1-3 1 T. clypeatum EC511807 1-4 2 T. hirtum EC429039 and EC425037 2-1 2 T. angustifolium EC539063 and EC425062 2 2-2 3 T. angustifolium (EC539058 & EC539064) and T. glomeratum EC401700 3-1 4 T. subterraneum (EC539068, EC401717 & EC539069) and T. pilulare EC528547 3 3-2 1 T. subterraneum EC401718 4 1 T. echinatum EC425075 T. apertum EC401712, T.fragiferum EC528539 and T. vesiculosum (EC401716, EC Ooty & 5-1 5 EC Palampur) T. echinatum EC425078, T. lappaceum (EC528542 & EC402165), T. grandiflorum EC528540, 5 5-2 6 T. ligusticum EC528544 and T. balanse EC511775 5-3 1 T. diffusum EC528538 5-4 3 T. hybridum EC401702 , EC425029 and EC401701 6-1 1 T. nigrescence 6 6-2 5 T. repens EC400385, EC402155, EC400984, EC400379 and EC401705 6-3 1 T. repens EC401706 7 2 T. pratense EC400980 & EC400979 8-1 3 T. dasyurum EC511808 and T. echinatum (EC425076 & EC425077) 8-2 2 T. spumosum EC511781 and EC528549 8 T. glomeratum EC405033 and T. resupinatum (EC401715, EC425073, EC425074, EC425072 8-3 6 and EC425071) 9 3 T. compestre EC402155, EC425027 & EC425028 78 10 1 T. repens EC400987
  • 79. Compatibility between different species is an indication of close affinity between two species. In Trifolium, the incompatibility barriers are very strong. Evans (1962 b) reported the existence of high degree of incompatibility between species of Trifolium. The present study is an attempt to know the genetic similarity among 10 Trifolium species and their relationship with T. alexandrinum based on compatibility studies. 79
  • 80. S. No. Female Parent Male Parent Obs-1 Obs-2 Obs-3 Obs-4 P-I P-II P-III P-VI P-V Observations Seed Setting Control T.alexandrinum T.alexandrinum 5hrs 10 1.8 1.7 1.9 1.7 2.4 2.4 1.4 Normal seed Normal cross cv Wardan cv Wardan setting 1 T.alexandrinum T.angustifolium 1hr 10 0.2 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 No withering No cv Wardan EC539058 5hrs 10 1.8 1.5 0.5 0.3 0.3 0.2 0 8hrs 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 T.alexandrinum T.clypeatum 1hr 5 0.2 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 No withering No EC511781 EC528536 3hrs 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5hrs 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8hrs 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 T.alexandrinum T.grandiflorum 3hrs 5 0.6 1.2 0 1 0.2 0 0 Withering 2 DAP No cv Wardan ECEC528540 5hrs 5 0.8 0.8 0 0.2 0.4 0.2 0 & shrivel ovaries 8hrs 5 1.2 2.2 1.6 1.2 1.2 1 0.2 4 T.alexandrinum T. compestre 1hr 5 0.6 0.6 0.4 0 0 0 0 No withering up No cv Wardan EC5425027 3hrs 5 1.2 0.8 0.8 0.2 0 0 0 to 5 days 5hrs 5 0.8 1.4 0.8 0.4 0.2 0 0 5 T.alexandrinum T .repens 1hr 10 0.9 0.6 0.5 0 0 0 0 No withering No cv Wardan EC400385 5hrs 11 0.82 0.82 0.6 0.18 0 0 0 6 T.alexandrinum T .ligusticum 1hr 10 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.1 0 0 0 Withering 2 DAP No cv Wardan EC528544 5hrs 10 1.6 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.1 0 7 T.alexandrinum T. balansae 1hr 10 1.1 0.6 0 0 0 0 0 No withering No cv Wardan EC511775 5hrs 10 0.5 0.4 0 0 0 0 0 8 T.alexandrinum T. hirtum 1hr 10 0.3 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 No withering No cv BB-2 EC425039 5hrs 10 0.2 0.4 0.5 0 0 0 0 9 T.alexandrinum T. pilulare 1hr 10 0.2 0.2 0 0 0 0 0 No withering No cv Wardan EC528547 5hrs 10 0.2 0.3 0.2 0 0 0 0 10 T.alexandrinum T. hybridum 1hr 10 0.2 0.3 0 0 0 0 0 No withering No cv BB-2 EC41702 5hrs 10 1.3 0.3 0.4 0 0 0 0 Obs-1=Flowers harvested after 5hrs Obs-2=Number of pistils observed. Obs-3Number of pollen attached (Average). Obs-4=Hairy region of stigma with pollen tubes or pollen germination (Average). 80
  • 81. Fig: Pollen tube growth in different cross combinations Control cross (A-J) (Wardan) x T. clypeatum EC528536 (K-L) (Wardan) x T. hirtum EC425039 (M) (Wardan) x T. angustifolium EC539058 (N-X) 81
  • 82. Fig: Pollen tube growth in different cross combinations:- (Wardan) x T. balansae EC511775 (A-D) (Wardan) x T. compestre EC5425027 (E-H) (Wardan) x T. ligusticum EC528544 (I-Q) (Wardan) x T. repense EC400385 (R-T) 82
  • 83. Good mitotic preparations with well spread metaphase were studied. 5 cultivars of T. alexandrinum representing 3 ecotypes viz., Mescawi (Wardan, BB-2 & BB-3), Saidi (Ex-8) and Fahli (FAO-5) were analyzed on the basis of mitotic preparations. The number of chromosomes were found to be 2n=16 in Wardan, BB-2, FAO-5 and Ex-8 while in BB- 3, the number of chromosome was 2n=32. 83
  • 84. Mitotic preparations of different ecotypes of berseem (T. alexandrinum) BB-3 Wardan BB-2 Ex-8 FAO-5 84
  • 85. 85
  • 86. 86
  • 87. 87
  • 88. 88
  • 89. 89