Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Online program evaluation


Published on

Published in: Education, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Online program evaluation

  1. 1. ELANCO School District<br />Online program evaluation<br />Jill Beck<br />Business Education Teacher<br />
  2. 2. School Setting<br />Online Audience<br />Online Program Evaluation Criteria <br />Index<br />
  3. 3. ELANCO School District<br />School Setting<br />
  4. 4. Student population: 3,111<br />Students transported to non-public schools: 416<br />Students attending school online: 96<br />ELANCO tuition cost: <br />Elementary: $7,848<br />Secondary: $9,150<br />IEP: $14,000<br />ELANCO Students<br />
  5. 5. ELANCO School District<br />ELANCONLINE Audience<br />
  6. 6. Mixed socioeconomic<br />Mixed cultures<br />Mixed reasons<br />Online Audience<br />
  7. 7. Students who want to earn an ELANCO diploma<br />Students who enjoy extra-curricular activities<br />Students who want the opportunity to meet face-to-face with teachers or other students <br />ELANCOnline Advantages<br />
  8. 8. ELANCO School District<br />Online program evaluation criteria<br />
  9. 9. To determine if learning outcomes are being met <br />To ensure learning is student-centered<br />Evaluation goals<br />
  10. 10. Evaluate:<br />Course content<br />Course design<br />Grading procedures<br />Instructor communication and effectiveness <br />Technology <br />How to meet those goals<br />
  11. 11. The syllabus was easily accessible on the web and on the learning management system<br />The course objectives were present and easily accessible<br />Assignments and assessments contributed to learning the course objectives and outcomes<br />The reading and assignments contributed to my learning <br />A variety of instructional approaches were used <br />Discussion boards allowing students to ask for help were available <br />Course Content<br />
  12. 12. Course Design<br />The course content was well organized and easy to follow<br />The course was organized in modules that followed a logical sequence <br />Grading Procedures<br />Grading procedures for assignments were easy to understand and were linked to the learning objectives of the lesson or unit <br />Grading rubrics were used for projects and assignments <br />Course Design & Grading<br />
  13. 13. The instructor provided timely feedback<br />The instructors feedback was clear and useful <br />The instructor treated students with respect <br />The instructor provided opportunities for students to learn from each other <br />The instructor showed enthusiasm for the subject matter<br />Instructor Evaluation<br />
  14. 14. Tech support was available if needed <br />Technical problems were addressed in a timely manner <br />Tutorials were available to demonstrate the use of the learning management system <br />Technology Evaluation<br />
  15. 15. ELANCO School District<br />Questions?<br />Contact me:<br />