Online program evaluation


Published on

Published in: Education, Technology
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Online program evaluation

  1. 1. ELANCO School District<br />Online program evaluation<br />Jill Beck<br />Business Education Teacher<br />
  2. 2. School Setting<br />Online Audience<br />Online Program Evaluation Criteria <br />Index<br />
  3. 3. ELANCO School District<br />School Setting<br />
  4. 4. Student population: 3,111<br />Students transported to non-public schools: 416<br />Students attending school online: 96<br />ELANCO tuition cost: <br />Elementary: $7,848<br />Secondary: $9,150<br />IEP: $14,000<br />ELANCO Students<br />
  5. 5. ELANCO School District<br />ELANCONLINE Audience<br />
  6. 6. Mixed socioeconomic<br />Mixed cultures<br />Mixed reasons<br />Online Audience<br />
  7. 7. Students who want to earn an ELANCO diploma<br />Students who enjoy extra-curricular activities<br />Students who want the opportunity to meet face-to-face with teachers or other students <br />ELANCOnline Advantages<br />
  8. 8. ELANCO School District<br />Online program evaluation criteria<br />
  9. 9. To determine if learning outcomes are being met <br />To ensure learning is student-centered<br />Evaluation goals<br />
  10. 10. Evaluate:<br />Course content<br />Course design<br />Grading procedures<br />Instructor communication and <br />Technology <br />How to meet those goals<br />
  11. 11. The syllabus was easily accessible on the web and on the learning management system<br />The course objectives were present and easily accessible<br />Assignments and assessments contributed to learning the course objectives and outcomes<br />The reading and assignments contributed to my learning <br />A variety of instructional approaches were used <br />Discussion boards allowing students to ask for help were available <br />Course Content<br />
  12. 12. Course Design<br />The course content was well organized and easy to follow<br />The course was organized in modules that followed a logical sequence <br />Grading Procedures<br />Grading procedures for assignments were easy to understand and were linked to the learning objectives of the lesson or unit <br />Grading rubrics were used for projects and assignments <br />Course Design & Grading<br />
  13. 13. The instructor provided timely feedback<br />The instructors feedback was clear and useful <br />The instructor treated students with respect <br />The instructor provided opportunities for students to learn from each other <br />The instructor showed enthusiasm for the subject matter<br />Instructor Evaluation<br />
  14. 14. Tech support was available if needed <br />Technical problems were addressed in a timely manner <br />Tutorials were available to demonstrate the use of the learning management system <br />Technology Evaluation<br />
  15. 15. ELANCO School District<br />Questions?<br />Contact me:<br />