SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Journal for Software Engineering
, 2011
January 20th, 2011
Took notes regarding the meeting we had with the client. We assessed and sorted out the
important information that we would need to ensure we accomplished our objective of a
finished site.

January 27th, 2011
Each of us went over the entire Specifications document that David Wuske had created.
We made some modifications, and doubly ensured we had a firm idea on what needed to
be done to make the site its best. I took up the position as head of the documentation
subgroup at this time.

February 3rd, 2011
We went over the Specification document and method of grading primarily, along with
some focus on designing the database. Discussions continued on blackboard, with
another topic of interest being the control of intellectual property.

February 10th, 2011
Together we laid out plans for the majority of the semester, with such topics addressed as
the database, data dictionary, and back-up. The issue of the ER diagram was also
addressed, with testing and intellectual property-related documents mentioned as well. At
this time much of the work each subgroup and each person had to do was discussed and
for the most part decided. For those involved in documentation, we needed to do research
on what the User Agreement, Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, and other intellectual
property issued entailed, along with how they applied to our site. We also had to work on
deciding some questions we may ask the Patent Lawyer who was planned to come in
later in the semester.

February 17th, 2011
We began working on creating the many documents our subgroup was tasked to be
doing, based off of the research we each performed. General examples were one such
way we were able to better understand how User Agreements and the Terms of Service
operated.

February 24th, 2011
Discussions over how Test Cases would be executed were one of the major highlights of
this class. Likewise, testing of the site had been divided amongst each member, with my
area being decided on as the Dashboard/User Account sections. During this time I had
been reading the book on intellectual property that was handed out between both groups,
as were the other members of my group.

March 10th, 2011
Went over the concept of Test Cases in further detail. Reformatted what I had done
regarding my own Test Cases, adding and renaming sections accordingly. Went over how
to apply the test cases toward the wireframes that had been designed.
March 17th, 2011
I finished with the book on intellectual property at this point. I also handed in my test
cases at this time. Discussions for this class focused on the book and the test cases once
again. Another topic we touched on was how to incorporate e-mails with pre-generated
messages that users of the site would get, depending on their actions. The questions we
would ask the lawyer were also discussed at this point.

March 24th, 2011
We talked with the lawyer as a class, with notes being taken by many of us, including
myself. Discussions continued on how the User Agreement, Terms of Service, and
Privacy Policy should be modified and finished. Minor discussions regarding testing and
registration to the site were also covered at this time. Notes taken while talking to the
lawyer, along with the information the lawyer himself conveyed offered a lot of insight
on patents and copyrights, and how employees are affected by each. The effects, ability,
and composition of both patents and copyrights were covered in great detail.

March 31st, 2011
I turned in some results regarding the beginning sessions of testing. Testing the site
actively was a major focus of this particular class, with some clarification on areas of
testing allowing me to know where to focus my attention on. General tests were also
employed, in order to test the interactive features that the site needed to be capable of.

April 7th, 2011
This class was mostly focused on testing the site, with re-registering a necessity, as it
would be again in the future, to incorporate changes. The remainder of the semester’s
schedule was decided at this time. Regarding errors, it was decided we would go into
detail over each error we had found and then notify those who would fix them.

April 14th, 2011
I ensured that the many items based on intellectual property were finished by this time,
with most changes and revisions done by now. The User Agreement, FAQs, Terms of
Service, and Privacy Policy were handed over, to be added to the site. Work started in
regards to the final presentation, mostly deciding how to present the site. More testing
was done, both inside and outside of class.

April 28th, 2011, May 4th, 2011
Further testing was done, but most errors found were fixed by this point. The presentation
became the focus of my subgroup, with each of us pitching in ideas for information to be
placed in it. Eventually we worked with the designers on the look of the presentation,
along with deciding who would be presenting it. I collected any remaining information at
this point, to ensure it was kept intact.

May 5th, 2011
This was the day of the presentation, and the last class. I made sure to contribute test
items for the presentation as I had during the testing phase.

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Essay #2 ethical considerations
Essay #2   ethical considerationsEssay #2   ethical considerations
Essay #2 ethical considerationsjandrewsxu
 
Chapter #8 lab
Chapter #8 labChapter #8 lab
Chapter #8 labjandrewsxu
 
Modulation schemes 8
Modulation schemes 8Modulation schemes 8
Modulation schemes 8jandrewsxu
 
Essay #2 ethical considerations
Essay #2   ethical considerationsEssay #2   ethical considerations
Essay #2 ethical considerationsjandrewsxu
 
Bluetooth wi fi wi max 2, 3
Bluetooth wi fi wi max 2, 3Bluetooth wi fi wi max 2, 3
Bluetooth wi fi wi max 2, 3jandrewsxu
 
Database chapter 11 homework
Database chapter 11 homeworkDatabase chapter 11 homework
Database chapter 11 homeworkjandrewsxu
 
Midterm paper medical records
Midterm paper   medical recordsMidterm paper   medical records
Midterm paper medical recordsjandrewsxu
 
Database chapter 10 questions
Database chapter 10 questionsDatabase chapter 10 questions
Database chapter 10 questionsjandrewsxu
 
Assumptions, applicable measures, er diagram
Assumptions, applicable measures, er diagramAssumptions, applicable measures, er diagram
Assumptions, applicable measures, er diagramjandrewsxu
 

Viewers also liked (10)

Essay #2 ethical considerations
Essay #2   ethical considerationsEssay #2   ethical considerations
Essay #2 ethical considerations
 
Chapter #8 lab
Chapter #8 labChapter #8 lab
Chapter #8 lab
 
Modulation schemes 8
Modulation schemes 8Modulation schemes 8
Modulation schemes 8
 
Essay #2 ethical considerations
Essay #2   ethical considerationsEssay #2   ethical considerations
Essay #2 ethical considerations
 
Bluetooth wi fi wi max 2, 3
Bluetooth wi fi wi max 2, 3Bluetooth wi fi wi max 2, 3
Bluetooth wi fi wi max 2, 3
 
Database chapter 11 homework
Database chapter 11 homeworkDatabase chapter 11 homework
Database chapter 11 homework
 
Resume
ResumeResume
Resume
 
Midterm paper medical records
Midterm paper   medical recordsMidterm paper   medical records
Midterm paper medical records
 
Database chapter 10 questions
Database chapter 10 questionsDatabase chapter 10 questions
Database chapter 10 questions
 
Assumptions, applicable measures, er diagram
Assumptions, applicable measures, er diagramAssumptions, applicable measures, er diagram
Assumptions, applicable measures, er diagram
 

Similar to Journal

Many Hands Make Light Work: Public Collaborative Text Correction in Australia...
Many Hands Make Light Work: Public Collaborative Text Correction in Australia...Many Hands Make Light Work: Public Collaborative Text Correction in Australia...
Many Hands Make Light Work: Public Collaborative Text Correction in Australia...Rose Holley
 
Enhancement and Enrichment of Digital Content by User Communities: The Aust...
Enhancement and Enrichment of Digital Content by User Communities: The Aust...Enhancement and Enrichment of Digital Content by User Communities: The Aust...
Enhancement and Enrichment of Digital Content by User Communities: The Aust...guest6a9161
 
Enhancement and Enrichment of Digital Content by User Communities: The Austra...
Enhancement and Enrichment of Digital Content by User Communities: The Austra...Enhancement and Enrichment of Digital Content by User Communities: The Austra...
Enhancement and Enrichment of Digital Content by User Communities: The Austra...Rose Holley
 
Generic research protocol
Generic research protocolGeneric research protocol
Generic research protocolItamar Medeiros
 
Peer1
Peer1Peer1
Peer1aizu
 
Designing Job Aids
Designing Job AidsDesigning Job Aids
Designing Job Aidscpetrizzo
 
Intranet 2.0 School: Building the essential staff intranet for your library
Intranet 2.0 School: Building the essential staff intranet for your libraryIntranet 2.0 School: Building the essential staff intranet for your library
Intranet 2.0 School: Building the essential staff intranet for your libraryChris Evjy
 
DITA Collaboration for Content
DITA Collaboration for ContentDITA Collaboration for Content
DITA Collaboration for ContentDon Day
 
Assignment 3 Presenting With PowerPointJane R. Doe .docx
Assignment 3 Presenting With PowerPointJane R. Doe           .docxAssignment 3 Presenting With PowerPointJane R. Doe           .docx
Assignment 3 Presenting With PowerPointJane R. Doe .docxrock73
 
Phil Wolff at #SemTech
Phil Wolff at #SemTechPhil Wolff at #SemTech
Phil Wolff at #SemTechPhil Wolff
 
E-standards supporting content development
E-standards supporting content developmentE-standards supporting content development
E-standards supporting content developmentJo Kay
 
Skills summative assesment reflections
Skills summative assesment reflectionsSkills summative assesment reflections
Skills summative assesment reflectionskkhayer18
 
Design Suggestions for EPA’s One Wiki in Support of the EPA OGD Work Group
Design Suggestions for EPA’s One Wiki in Support of  the EPA OGD Work GroupDesign Suggestions for EPA’s One Wiki in Support of  the EPA OGD Work Group
Design Suggestions for EPA’s One Wiki in Support of the EPA OGD Work Groupguest8c518a8
 
Design Suggestions for EPA’s One Wiki in Support of the EPA OGD Work Group
Design Suggestions for EPA’s One Wiki in Support of the EPA OGD Work GroupDesign Suggestions for EPA’s One Wiki in Support of the EPA OGD Work Group
Design Suggestions for EPA’s One Wiki in Support of the EPA OGD Work Groupguest8c518a8
 
Usability Testing in Federal Libraries: A Case Study
Usability Testing in Federal Libraries: A Case StudyUsability Testing in Federal Libraries: A Case Study
Usability Testing in Federal Libraries: A Case Studynullhandle
 
Peer reviewexercise4
Peer reviewexercise4Peer reviewexercise4
Peer reviewexercise4s1170209
 

Similar to Journal (20)

Many Hands Make Light Work: Public Collaborative Text Correction in Australia...
Many Hands Make Light Work: Public Collaborative Text Correction in Australia...Many Hands Make Light Work: Public Collaborative Text Correction in Australia...
Many Hands Make Light Work: Public Collaborative Text Correction in Australia...
 
Enhancement and Enrichment of Digital Content by User Communities: The Aust...
Enhancement and Enrichment of Digital Content by User Communities: The Aust...Enhancement and Enrichment of Digital Content by User Communities: The Aust...
Enhancement and Enrichment of Digital Content by User Communities: The Aust...
 
Enhancement and Enrichment of Digital Content by User Communities: The Austra...
Enhancement and Enrichment of Digital Content by User Communities: The Austra...Enhancement and Enrichment of Digital Content by User Communities: The Austra...
Enhancement and Enrichment of Digital Content by User Communities: The Austra...
 
G T F Fall Report
G T F  Fall  ReportG T F  Fall  Report
G T F Fall Report
 
Generic research protocol
Generic research protocolGeneric research protocol
Generic research protocol
 
Peer1
Peer1Peer1
Peer1
 
Designing Job Aids
Designing Job AidsDesigning Job Aids
Designing Job Aids
 
Intranet 2.0 School: Building the essential staff intranet for your library
Intranet 2.0 School: Building the essential staff intranet for your libraryIntranet 2.0 School: Building the essential staff intranet for your library
Intranet 2.0 School: Building the essential staff intranet for your library
 
DITA Collaboration for Content
DITA Collaboration for ContentDITA Collaboration for Content
DITA Collaboration for Content
 
chrissy burns
chrissy burnschrissy burns
chrissy burns
 
chrissy burns
chrissy burnschrissy burns
chrissy burns
 
Assignment 3 Presenting With PowerPointJane R. Doe .docx
Assignment 3 Presenting With PowerPointJane R. Doe           .docxAssignment 3 Presenting With PowerPointJane R. Doe           .docx
Assignment 3 Presenting With PowerPointJane R. Doe .docx
 
Phil Wolff at #SemTech
Phil Wolff at #SemTechPhil Wolff at #SemTech
Phil Wolff at #SemTech
 
E-standards supporting content development
E-standards supporting content developmentE-standards supporting content development
E-standards supporting content development
 
Skills summative assesment reflections
Skills summative assesment reflectionsSkills summative assesment reflections
Skills summative assesment reflections
 
OERP Workshop; Methods & Processes- OER FAQ
OERP Workshop; Methods & Processes- OER FAQOERP Workshop; Methods & Processes- OER FAQ
OERP Workshop; Methods & Processes- OER FAQ
 
Design Suggestions for EPA’s One Wiki in Support of the EPA OGD Work Group
Design Suggestions for EPA’s One Wiki in Support of  the EPA OGD Work GroupDesign Suggestions for EPA’s One Wiki in Support of  the EPA OGD Work Group
Design Suggestions for EPA’s One Wiki in Support of the EPA OGD Work Group
 
Design Suggestions for EPA’s One Wiki in Support of the EPA OGD Work Group
Design Suggestions for EPA’s One Wiki in Support of the EPA OGD Work GroupDesign Suggestions for EPA’s One Wiki in Support of the EPA OGD Work Group
Design Suggestions for EPA’s One Wiki in Support of the EPA OGD Work Group
 
Usability Testing in Federal Libraries: A Case Study
Usability Testing in Federal Libraries: A Case StudyUsability Testing in Federal Libraries: A Case Study
Usability Testing in Federal Libraries: A Case Study
 
Peer reviewexercise4
Peer reviewexercise4Peer reviewexercise4
Peer reviewexercise4
 

More from jandrewsxu

Data dictionary
Data dictionaryData dictionary
Data dictionaryjandrewsxu
 
Final presentation(v5)
Final presentation(v5)Final presentation(v5)
Final presentation(v5)jandrewsxu
 
Essay #1 analzying google's censorship
Essay #1   analzying google's censorshipEssay #1   analzying google's censorship
Essay #1 analzying google's censorshipjandrewsxu
 
Chapter 11 group assignment
Chapter 11 group assignmentChapter 11 group assignment
Chapter 11 group assignmentjandrewsxu
 
Chapter 8 group assignment
Chapter 8 group assignmentChapter 8 group assignment
Chapter 8 group assignmentjandrewsxu
 
Chapter 7 task 2 (of group assignment)
Chapter 7 task 2 (of group assignment)Chapter 7 task 2 (of group assignment)
Chapter 7 task 2 (of group assignment)jandrewsxu
 
Chapter 4 group assignment
Chapter 4 group assignmentChapter 4 group assignment
Chapter 4 group assignmentjandrewsxu
 

More from jandrewsxu (7)

Data dictionary
Data dictionaryData dictionary
Data dictionary
 
Final presentation(v5)
Final presentation(v5)Final presentation(v5)
Final presentation(v5)
 
Essay #1 analzying google's censorship
Essay #1   analzying google's censorshipEssay #1   analzying google's censorship
Essay #1 analzying google's censorship
 
Chapter 11 group assignment
Chapter 11 group assignmentChapter 11 group assignment
Chapter 11 group assignment
 
Chapter 8 group assignment
Chapter 8 group assignmentChapter 8 group assignment
Chapter 8 group assignment
 
Chapter 7 task 2 (of group assignment)
Chapter 7 task 2 (of group assignment)Chapter 7 task 2 (of group assignment)
Chapter 7 task 2 (of group assignment)
 
Chapter 4 group assignment
Chapter 4 group assignmentChapter 4 group assignment
Chapter 4 group assignment
 

Journal

  • 1. Journal for Software Engineering , 2011 January 20th, 2011 Took notes regarding the meeting we had with the client. We assessed and sorted out the important information that we would need to ensure we accomplished our objective of a finished site. January 27th, 2011 Each of us went over the entire Specifications document that David Wuske had created. We made some modifications, and doubly ensured we had a firm idea on what needed to be done to make the site its best. I took up the position as head of the documentation subgroup at this time. February 3rd, 2011 We went over the Specification document and method of grading primarily, along with some focus on designing the database. Discussions continued on blackboard, with another topic of interest being the control of intellectual property. February 10th, 2011 Together we laid out plans for the majority of the semester, with such topics addressed as the database, data dictionary, and back-up. The issue of the ER diagram was also addressed, with testing and intellectual property-related documents mentioned as well. At this time much of the work each subgroup and each person had to do was discussed and for the most part decided. For those involved in documentation, we needed to do research on what the User Agreement, Privacy Policy, Terms of Use, and other intellectual property issued entailed, along with how they applied to our site. We also had to work on deciding some questions we may ask the Patent Lawyer who was planned to come in later in the semester. February 17th, 2011 We began working on creating the many documents our subgroup was tasked to be doing, based off of the research we each performed. General examples were one such way we were able to better understand how User Agreements and the Terms of Service operated. February 24th, 2011 Discussions over how Test Cases would be executed were one of the major highlights of this class. Likewise, testing of the site had been divided amongst each member, with my area being decided on as the Dashboard/User Account sections. During this time I had been reading the book on intellectual property that was handed out between both groups, as were the other members of my group. March 10th, 2011 Went over the concept of Test Cases in further detail. Reformatted what I had done regarding my own Test Cases, adding and renaming sections accordingly. Went over how to apply the test cases toward the wireframes that had been designed.
  • 2. March 17th, 2011 I finished with the book on intellectual property at this point. I also handed in my test cases at this time. Discussions for this class focused on the book and the test cases once again. Another topic we touched on was how to incorporate e-mails with pre-generated messages that users of the site would get, depending on their actions. The questions we would ask the lawyer were also discussed at this point. March 24th, 2011 We talked with the lawyer as a class, with notes being taken by many of us, including myself. Discussions continued on how the User Agreement, Terms of Service, and Privacy Policy should be modified and finished. Minor discussions regarding testing and registration to the site were also covered at this time. Notes taken while talking to the lawyer, along with the information the lawyer himself conveyed offered a lot of insight on patents and copyrights, and how employees are affected by each. The effects, ability, and composition of both patents and copyrights were covered in great detail. March 31st, 2011 I turned in some results regarding the beginning sessions of testing. Testing the site actively was a major focus of this particular class, with some clarification on areas of testing allowing me to know where to focus my attention on. General tests were also employed, in order to test the interactive features that the site needed to be capable of. April 7th, 2011 This class was mostly focused on testing the site, with re-registering a necessity, as it would be again in the future, to incorporate changes. The remainder of the semester’s schedule was decided at this time. Regarding errors, it was decided we would go into detail over each error we had found and then notify those who would fix them. April 14th, 2011 I ensured that the many items based on intellectual property were finished by this time, with most changes and revisions done by now. The User Agreement, FAQs, Terms of Service, and Privacy Policy were handed over, to be added to the site. Work started in regards to the final presentation, mostly deciding how to present the site. More testing was done, both inside and outside of class. April 28th, 2011, May 4th, 2011 Further testing was done, but most errors found were fixed by this point. The presentation became the focus of my subgroup, with each of us pitching in ideas for information to be placed in it. Eventually we worked with the designers on the look of the presentation, along with deciding who would be presenting it. I collected any remaining information at this point, to ensure it was kept intact. May 5th, 2011 This was the day of the presentation, and the last class. I made sure to contribute test items for the presentation as I had during the testing phase.