2. 2003 First Ministers Health Accord
National Pharmaceuticals Strategy (NPS)
F/P/T commitment that :
“No one will be denied access to necessary, very
high-cost drugs based on where they live , or
their ability to pay.”
3. Principles for NPS
1. Universality: all Canadians are eligible
2. Equity : comparable coverage across the country
3. Transparency : coverage levels are easy to understand and
access
4. Integrated : catastrophic protection is integrated with
other public and private drug plans
5. Sustainability : affordable, sustainable, and balanced with
other health care priorities
4. Two Options for Design Proposed
1. Option one :Threshold for the program :
variable percentage of family income from
0%, 3%,6% and 9% after which drugs covered
100%. Below $20,000 income =0% and above
$90,000 = 9%.
2. Option two : 5% fixed income threshold after
which drugs are covered 100%
5. OUTCOME of NPS Proposal
After protracted negotiations among F/P/T
partners:
RIP
6. Kirby and Romanow Reports, 2002,
Commission Recommendations
• Both supported catastrophic drug plans
• Both identified maximum $1500 per annum
threshold for
catastrophic drug transfer to federal plan
> Kirby added 3% of household income to a
maximum of $1500 per year as threshold for a pan-
Canadian catastrophic drug plan
8. Ontario Minister of Health’s Expert
Roundtable June, 2015
Group of academics, provincial government bureaucrats
and politicians, consultants
Issues raised:
Increasing costs and prices of brand, generic drugs
Poor prescribing practices
HTA recommendations
Limited drug budgets both publicly and privately
Limited R+D from industry
Aging population
Rare diseases and novel drug innovations
10. Federal Minister of Health’s Mandate
Exploring the need for a national formulary
11. F/P/T Ministers of Health Meeting
January 2016
Announcement of an F/P/T Working Group to
study pharmacare
12. Model Proposed by Canadian
Treatment Action Council (CTAC), 2009
Universal Catastrophic Drug Plan
Legislated addition to existing public plans
Multi- stakeholder funded insurance plan
Available to all Canadian residents i.e. universal, needs
based
For prescription drugs, biologics, medical devices, approved
by HC
Rare diseases included
Cosmetic treatments excluded
Prescribed by a regulated HC professional
No waiting period from province to province
For those without any or adequate coverage
13. CTAC Model
Coverage and Funding
First dollar coverage after cost sharing
Sliding scale cost sharing based on family income and
tax bracket
$0 cost for those in lowest tax bracket
$ TBD for each higher tax bracket
No increased cost to anyone as a result of plan
introduction from last year’s out of pocket expenses
F/P/T governments and employers will also contribute
14. CTAC Model
Listing Decisions
Drug listing based on best clinical evidence and
practice, not only on cost
All prescribers required to sign an Appropriate
Prescribing and Utilization Commitment document
Pharmaceutical manufacturers to fund objective
prescriber education on appropriate prescribing and
utilization, adherence
Manufacturers will contribute to systematic, regular
revision of Canadian databases and textbooks
15. CTAC Model
Plan management
Managed centrally and administered by
existing F/P/T drug plans
Central management body evaluates every
three years
Tabled to MoHs and made public
No substantive changes made to the plan
without public consultation
16. CTAC Model
Private Plans
Stay in place
Remain first payers
Public plans are second payers as presently
Catastrophic plan kicks in third
17. CTAC Model
Costs
This depends on what you measure as
cost/benefits
Rare disease inclusion makes no real
difference
Initial econometric modelling determined that
this would not cost more than present system
but this needs updating to 2016 realities