based on a article review..

1. INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT PRESENTATION

2. ARTICLE: INDIAS RISE AFTER POKHRAN II : CHINESE ANALYSIS AND
ASSESSMENTS
JING DONG YUAN
• Professor Yuan is Director of the East
Asia Nonproliferation Program.
• A graduate of the Xi'an Foreign
Language University, People's Republic
of China (1982).
• Currently working on a book manuscript
on post-Cold War Chinese security
policy.
• Chinese defense and foreign policy
• Asia-Pacific security (with a focus on
Northeast Asia and South China Sea)
• Non-proliferation, arms control and
disarmament
• American Asia policy
• Shanghai Cooperation Organization

3. WHAT HE TRIED TO HIGHLIGHT
• India`s nuclear test for
international control and non-
proliferation.
• India as the major power and
Chaina`s view regarding this.
• Chaina`s analysis about how to
manage the post Pokhran II Sino-
Indian relationship.
• The common interest of both the
countries and their disputes .

4. INDIA`S VIEW
• May 1998 second nuclear
test by india.
• Claimed the threat of China
after 1962 war.
• Willingness of becoming
major power.
• Not signing the CTBT & NPT.
• Domination over the South
Asian region.

5. CHINA`S ANALYSIS
• Understood the desire of India.
• Called for P-5 meeting.
• Further threats i.e.: engagement
of Iraq, Egypt& Israel.
• Made India responsible for the
Pakistan`s nuclear test.
• Breaker of international peace and
harmony.

6. WANT OF CHAINA
• Provide information about
their control and command
over the nuclear power.
• Become a responsible
NWS.
• Nuclear equipment's
should not be exported to
other countries.

7. RISE SO CALLED OR REAL
• India have nuclear
sufficiency.
• China was shocked due to
the event and engaged third
party.
• Lost the domination over
the region.
• Not taking Pakistan as the
rival.

8. WRITERS VIEW
• Not biased .
• Internal strategies of China were
avoided.
• competitor, Scope of loosing.