4. ahealth-enhancingstrategy.
Overtheyears,ICTbegantobeintegratedintohealthsystemsandservi
cesworldwide.During
the1990s,e-commerceemergedandenablednewways toconduct
transactionsvia the Internet.
eHealthwasalsoenabledby theInternet.The termeHealthrefers to
theuseof informationand
communication technologies to improve health and the health
care system (Oh, Rizo, Enkin &
Jadad,2005).TheInternetreferstothegloballyconnectednetworkofc
omputers.Althoughtheterm
InternetisusedinterchangeablywithWorldWideWebor‘theWeb’,th
eWorldWideWebrefers
tomultimedia-
baseddocumentsthatcanbeaccessedonline,overtheInternet(Lupton
,2014).This
becameknownastheWeb1.0eraortheso-
calledbrochurewebera.TheWeb1.0erabeganrapidly
in1990sbecauseoftheavailabilityofbrowserswithuser-
friendlygraphicalinterfaces.TheWorld
Wide Web had become avaluable channel for accessing and
seeking health information. Rapid
improvementincommunication,hardwareandsoftwaretechnologie
salsoledtonewandbetterhealth
serviceofferingsviatheInternet.Bytheearly2000s,therewasanotice
ableshiftintheuseofthe
webandthedevelopmentofweb-
basedapplications.ThiswastermedWeb2.0andinvolvesusers
creating,organizing,sharing,critiquingandupdatingcontent.Web2.
0connectspeopleandcontent
inuniqueways.Web2.0facilitatesan‘architectureofparticipation’–
adesignthatencouragesuser
interaction,empowermentandcommunitycontributions.PopularW
eb2.0applicationsincludeFlickr,
Wikipedia,Facebook,MySpace,TwitterandYouTube.Bythemid-
9. SeTTING THe STAGe
Introducing the e-Health Case Study
TerryRossiburst intohisoffice,walkeddirectly
tohisdeskandslumpedintohischair.Hehad
justarrivedfromanother
toughExcomeeting.Thecommitteewasconcerned that
the“wellness
innovations”deliveredontheWebhadsofarappealedtoonlyaminorit
yofcustomersandnotthe
highnumbersthathadbeenpromisedbye-
Health.Atbest,thehealthcarepromotionprogram,the
onlinenutritioncenter,wasservingasacomplementarychannelforas
mallcaptiveaudience.Terry
wonderedhowhewasgoingtoimprovetheperformanceoftheonlinen
utritioncenter.Terryknew
that ifhewere toconvince theExco that
thishealthcarepromotionprogramwasa success, this
programwouldhavetoattainacriticalmassofusers.Hewasconsiderin
gthestepshecouldtaketo
ensurethate-Healthbuiltacriticalmassofusers.
Journal of Cases on Information Technology
Volume 22 • Issue 4 • October-December 2020
47
CASe DeSCRIPTIoN
e-Health’s Nutrition Centre
E-
HealthistheindividualbrandnameofthewebsiteforHealthcareInsur
anceCompany(HIC)(Figure
1).HICiscomposedoftwootherbusinessunits:WellnessScienceCo
13. bythediffusionofinnovationtheory(Rogers,2010;Ward,2013),and
agreementbyusersonthe
utilityandeaseofuseasespousedbythetechnologyacceptancemodel
(Davis1989;Holden&Karsh,
2010),discontinuanceoftheNutritionCenterremainedextremelyhig
h.
Figure 2. Screen shot of e-Health’s landing page (2004 website
redesign)
Journal of Cases on Information Technology
Volume 22 • Issue 4 • October-December 2020
49
Promoting the Adoption of Healthcare Promotion Programs
Terry’sstrategytomarkettheNutritionCentreresultedinenticingma
nyuserstoregistertotrial
thetechnology.Thecampaignspromotedthecompany’svisionof“im
provingpeople’shealth
andenhancingtheirlifestyles”inanonlineenvironment.TheNutritio
nCentrewaspromoted
invariousmediums:
• Healthcare Insurance Fact
File:TheNutritionCentrewaspromotedinthefirm’sfactfile.
The fact filewasabooklet thatprincipalmembers receivedannually
toexplainhowtheir
healthplanworks.
• Healthcare
Magazine:TheNutritionCentrewasalsopromotedinahealthcaremag
azine.When
comparedtothedifferentawarenessmediumsthemagazineappearedt
14. obethemosteffectivein
promotingtheonlinechannel.Themagazineconsistentlyfeaturedarti
clesexplainingthebenefits
oftheNutritionCentretomembers.
• Email Newsletter
Campaigns:Theseemailsweretobecomeavitalcomponentoftheemai
l
promotioncampaignforpromotingtheNutritionCentre.
Other avenues for promoting the Nutrition Centre were
employers, brokers and the call
centreagents.
• Incentive
Points:Memberswereremindedthattheycouldearnpointsbyinteract
ingwiththe
onlinechannelandspecificallytheWellnessapplications.Itwasspeci
ficallytheabilitytoreap
rewardsfromcertainbehaviour,andgoingonlinetogatherrewards,su
chascheapergymnasium
fees,cheaperflightsandholidayaccommodations,thatledtoasignific
antincreaseinthenumber
ofregisteredusers.
Figure4showsthatasaresultofthesepromotions,asmanyas60%ofthe
registered
userbaseregisteredtousetheNutritionCentre.Despiteeffortsatprom
otingtheNutrition
Centre, However, Figure 5 shows that over a short period of
time as many as 90% of
registrantsneverreturnedtousetheNutritionCentre.Thisisinstarkco
ntrasttothehealth
insuredmemberbasechurnor lapse rateof3
to4%.DespiteTerry’sefforts toattaina
criticalmassofusers,theNutritionCentrewaseventuallydisbandedb
15. ecauseofthehigh
userdiscontinuance.
Figure 3. Nutrition center survey. Source: Bataleur, Customer
Satisfaction Survey.
Journal of Cases on Information Technology
Volume 22 • Issue 4 • October-December 2020
50
PoST IMPLeMeNTATIoN ReVIew: LeSSoNS FRoM THe PAST
Thefollowingproblemscontributed to
theslowuptakeandnegatively impacteddiffusionof the
NutritionZone.
Lesson 1: The Constraining Role of Broader Socio-economic
Structures
TheInternethighwayasastopforonlinewellnesstoolsisnowcompeti
ngwiththemoreresilient
structureofourroadnetworks.Eversincethegrowthofcarsalesandthe
subsequentgrowthofsuburbs,
growthwhich roadnetworkshadencouraged, fast
foodorganisationshavegrown into sprawling
multinationalsbyexploitingprimelocationswithin
thesehighwaynetworks.Evenindeveloping
countries likeSouthAfricaand in factmanyothercountriesaround
theglobe,corporations like
Figure 4. Share of active nutrition center users. Source: Internal
Report - Statistical analysis of retention.
Figure 5. Leaky bucket problem – losing users over time.
16. Source: Internal Report - Statistical analysis of retention.
Journal of Cases on Information Technology
Volume 22 • Issue 4 • October-December 2020
51
McDonaldshaveexportedthevaluesandtastesoftheirlocalculture.W
iththishomogenisationof
internationalfastfoodculture,countrieshavenotonlylosttheiridenti
tyintermsofhow,whereand
whattheyeat,buttheyhavealsoexposedthemselvestomajorhealthris
ks.
Asaresultofthepervasivenessofthesebroadersocialstructuresinmo
dernsocietybehavioural
changesaredifficulttomakeevenwiththeguidanceofapractitionerle
taloneviaadigitalhealthcare
promotiontool.ThefollowingexcerptbyoneofHIC’swellnesspractit
ionersdescribesthechallenge:
Behaviourchangeisanextremelycomplicatedthing.Itis.Imean,ever
ybodywhohasbeenon
aweightlossprogramknowsthatyoucanbeasdisciplinedand,youkno
w,withexerciseaswellfor
twoorthreeweeksandifyouskiptheweek,youhavetostartfromscratc
h.Imean,peoplegointothe
behaviourchangeforsixmonths,andtheyleaveandthentheyhavegott
ostart,andthentheyhave
lostallthatmotivation.So,ifpeopleloseinterest,thethingis,ifthey,ift
heyhadlearnedwhatthey
wantedtohere,theywouldactuallycomebacktokeeponmotivating.B
ecauseweneedtosustain
thatdevotion.Iftheyhavelostinterest,theyarealosstothecause;theya
17. rebacktooldbehaviour.
That,thatiswhatIhavelearned,youknow,throughexperience.
Lesson 2: Intense Competition for the Customer’s Attention
Thereareothermarketmechanismsoutsideof thehealth
insurancefirmthatarevyingfor the
consumer’sattention.Thecontentdeliveredbythemediaplaysacentr
alroleinhowconsumers
constructtheirvaluesandrulesofbehaviour.Inaneconomicsystemth
atfocusesonthenarrow
dictatesofprofitability,obesityhasbecomebigbusinessfortheverys
ystemthatinfluencedit.
Indeed,consumersareoverwhelmedbythevarietyofdietschemesand
weight-lossadviceand
productsthatareavailableinthemarketplace.Furthermore,foodisani
mportantfactorinour
day-to-daysocialpractices.
Lesson 3: The Relativistic View of Dietary Science
Eventhedieteticpracticeitselfissubjectivewithdifferentschoolsoft
houghtmakingdissimilarclaims
aboutthebestapproachforweightloss.Forinstance,somefocusoncal
oriereduction;othersfocus
onthetypesoffoodgroups(protein,carbohydrate,fat)suchaslowGI(
glycaemicindex),andthe
useofsupplementsandsoon,allservingtoconfusetheconsumer.The
NutritionExpertdescribed
thedifferentperspectivesimplicatedinthedesignoftheonlineNutriti
onCentreasfollows.
Therewere a lot of challenges Imeanwithin anypanelyouaregoing
tohavediffering
opinions.Although theyareallexcellentacademics in
theirownright therewasofcoursea
certaindegreeofnotnecessarilyconflictbutdifferencesofopinions
incertainaspects.You
18. couldcertainlypickupthedifferentslantsintheirparticularfieldofint
erestsandorpassion.
Soforexampleonewouldconstantlybeharpingaboutfibreorlentilsan
dtheotheronewould
beharpingonaboutyouknowvariousdifferentangles.Sotakingthesci
enceandtranslatingit
intoaninteractivetoolwasquiteachallenge.
Lesson 4: Delegating Tacit and Uncodified Knowledge to
Technology
Havingbeenapracticingdietician,theNutritionExpertsuggestedtha
tbecausefoodandeatingisa
veryemotiveissue,the“real-
world”dieticianoftenhastoplaytheroleofapsychologist,partcoach,
partfriend,andpartdietician.Adieticianalsospendsanenormousamo
untofeffortinmotivatinga
patient.Andevenduringthefollow-
upsessions,thedieticianbecomesthemotivatorandthecounsellor.
Thelimitationsofdelegatingtheroleofthedieticiantotheself-
servicetoolaresuccinctlydescribed
bywayofexamplebytheNutritionist.
Thosearethekindofthings,thesmallnuancesthatareimportant,tobea
rinmindbecauseofthe
factthatthiseatingissomethingwealldoeverydayanditishighlyemot
iveandsohighlyeffected
bythetypeoflifethatyoulead.Sotherearesomanyfactorsandnoteven
necessaryreallytobe
writtendown.Youknowyoujustpickthesethingsup.It’sreallyaboutg
atheringinformationand
Journal of Cases on Information Technology
Volume 22 • Issue 4 • October-December 2020
26. Davis,F.D.(1989).Perceivedusefulness,perceivedeaseofuse,andus
eracceptanceofinformationtechnology.
Management Information Systems Quarterly,13,319–339.
Darwish,A.,Hassanien,A.E.,Elhoseny,M.,Sangaiah,A.K.,&Muha
mmad,K.(2019).Theimpactofthe
hybridplatformofinternetofthingsandcloudcomputingonhealthcar
esystems:Opportunities,challenges,and
openproblems.Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized
Computing,10(10),4151–4166.doi:10.1007/
s12652-017-0659-1
Eldredge,L.K.B.,Markham,C.M.,Ruiter,R.A.,Kok,G.,Fernandez,
M.E.,&Parcel,G.S.(2016).Planning
health promotion programs: an intervention mapping
approach.JohnWiley&SonsInc.
Eriksson,M.,&Lindström,B.(2008).Asalutogenicinterpretationoft
heOttawaCharter.Health Promotion
International,23(2),190–
199.doi:10.1093/heapro/dan014PMID:18356285
Fransman,M.(2007).InnovationintheNewICTEcosystem,Commun
ications and Strategies.International
Journal of Digital Economies,68,89–110.
Gandjour,A.,&Lauterbach,K.W.(2005).Doespreventionsavecosts
?Consideringdeferraloftheexpensivelast
yearoflife.Journal of Health Economics,24(4),715–
724.doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.11.009PMID:15960993
Ginter,P.M.,Duncan,W.J.,&Swayne,L.E.(2018).The strategic
management of health care organizations
(8thed.).JohnWiley&SonsInc.
27. Giustini,D.(2007).Web3.0andmedicine:Makewayfor
thesemanticweb.BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.),
335(7633),1273–
1274.doi:10.1136/bmj.39428.494236.BEPMID:18156223
Green,L.W.,Richard,L.,&Potvin,L.(1996).Ecologicalfoundations
ofhealthpromotion.American Journal
of Health Promotion,10(4),270–281.doi:10.4278/0890-1171-
10.4.270PMID:10159708
Greenhalgh,T.(2018).Howtoimprovesuccessoftechnologyproject
sinhealthandsocialcare.Public Health
Research & Practice,28(3),1–
4.doi:10.17061/phrp2831815PMID:30406256
Greenhalgh,T.,Robert,G.,Bate,P.,Macfarlane,F.,&Kyriakidou,O.
(2008).Diffusion of innovations in health
service organisations: a systematic literature
review.BlackwellPublishingLtd.
Gugglberger,L.(2018).Canhealthpromotionalsodoharm?Health
Promotion International,33(4),557–560.
doi:10.1093/heapro/day060PMID:30239777
Holden,R.J.,&Karsh,B.T.(2010).Thetechnologyacceptancemodel
:Itspastanditsfutureinhealthcare.
Journal of Biomedical Informatics,43(1),159–
172.doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2009.07.002PMID:19615467
Iyengar,V.,&Nair,P.(2000).Globaloutlookonnutritionandtheenvir
onment:Meetingthechallengesofthe
nextmillennium.The Science of the Total Environment,249(1-
3),331–346.doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(99)00529-X
PMID:10813462
Jost, T. (2007). Health care at risk: a critique of the consumer-
30. sector:Aframeworkforasustainablebusinessmodel.Psychology
and Marketing,35(2),120–137.doi:10.1002/
mar.21074
Oh,H.,Rizo,C.,Enkin,M.,&Jadad,A.(2005).WhatiseHealth?:Asys
tematicreviewofpublisheddefinitions.
World Hospitals and Health Services,41(1),32–
40.doi:10.2196/jmir.7.1.e1PMID:15881824
Orji,R.,&Moffatt,K.(2018).Persuasivetechnologyforhealthandwe
llness:State-of-the-artandemerging
trends.Health Informatics Journal,24(1),66–
91.doi:10.1177/1460458216650979PMID:27245673
Panesar,A.(2019).Machine Learning and AI for Healthcare: Big
Data for Improved Health Outcomes.Apress.
doi:10.1007/978-1-4842-3799-1
Parasuraman,A.,&Colby,C.L.(2007).Techno-ready marketing:
How and why your customers adopt technology.
TheFreePress.
Porter,M.E.,&Teisberg,E.O.(2006).Redefining Health Care –
Creating Value-based Competition on Results.
HarvardBusinessSchoolPress.
Reichheld,F.F.,&Schefter,P. (2000,July).E-
loyalty:YoursecretweaponontheWeb.Harvard Business
Review,105–113.
Rogers,E.M.(2002).Diffusionofpreventiveinnovations.Addictive
Behaviors,27(6),989–993.doi:10.1016/
S0306-4603(02)00300-3PMID:12369480
Rogers,E.M.(2010).Diffusion of
Innovations(4thed.).SimonandSchuster.
31. Schlosser,E.(2002).Fast Food Nation – What the all-American
meal is doing to the world.London:Penguin.
Schraefel,M.C.,&Churchill,E.(2014).Wellthcreation:Usingcomp
utersciencetosupportproactivehealth.
IEEE Computer,47(11),70–72.doi:10.1109/MC.2014.339
Solberg,L.I.,Kottke,T.E.,Conn,S.A.,Brekke,M.L.,Calomeni,C.A.
,&Conboy,K.S.(1997).Delivering
clinicalpreventiveservicesisasystemsproblem.Annals of
Behavioral Medicine,19(3),271–278.doi:10.1007/
BF02892291PMID:9603701
vanGemert-
Pijnen,J.E.W.C.,Nijland,N.,vanLimburg,M.,Ossebaard,H.C.,Kel
ders,S.M.,Eysenbach,
G.,&Seydel,E.R.(2011).Aholisticframeworktoimprovetheuptake
andimpactofeHealthtechnologies.
Journal of Medical Internet Research,13(4),1–
19.doi:10.2196/jmir.1672PMID:22155738
Ward,R.(2013).Theapplicationoftechnologyacceptanceanddiffusi
onofinnovationmodelsinhealthcare
informatics.Health Policy and Technology,2(4),222–
228.doi:10.1016/j.hlpt.2013.07.002
WHO.(1986).Adiscussiondocumentontheconceptsandprincipleso
fhealthpromotion.Health Promotion
International,1(1),73–76.doi:10.1093/heapro/1.1.73
WorldHealthReport.(2002).Reducing Risks, Promoting Health
Life.Geneva:WorldHealthOrganization.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/games.3413
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25654660
35. served a number of clients on a number of IT projects in both
the public and private sectors over a 20-year period.
Naidoo is also an NRF-rated researcher. His research interests
are broadly about information systems and organisations
with a particular focus on IT value, IT human resources
development and end-user issues. He has published articles in
leading international outlets such as the Journal of Strategic
Information Systems and the Information Society Journal.
He lectures topics on IT investment and enterprise systems to
postgraduates at the university.
Table 2. Exhibit 5: Summary of key user characteristics
Subject Measures
Registration based on gender
Male
Female
Active use based on gender
Male
Female
Registered User Age Group
20-25
26-30
31-35
36-40
40-45
Greaterthan45
Preferred Language of Registered Users
English
Afrikaans
Wellness
Schememembersonwellnessprogram
Wellnessmembersaspartofonlineregistereduserbase
53.37%
36. 46.63%
48%
52%
21.91%
32.02%
23.60%
6.74%
8.43%
7.30%
56%
44%
70%
92%
Source:InternalManagementReport(2004)
ThemajorityoftheusersappeartobeyoungerandaffiliatedtotheWell
nessprogram.
Themeasureofactiveuseisbasedonloginspermonth
Special Education 'Issues & Applications Journal' Entry 2
Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Learners
For select modules that do not include a 'Building bridges to
practice: Reflective log' assignment, you will be asked to write
responses to questions that pertain to course topics and
readings. You will write your responses to these questions by
adding your responses to each set of questions in a given
module and submitting that response in the appropriate location
(i.e. in module 4 you will add your responses in module 4).
Some questions might also refer to a topic and readings from a
previous module. You will be asked to come prepared to discuss
your responses with your classmates and instructor. Your
responses should be clear, detailed, and address all aspects of a
given question (see rubric).
Questions for Entry 2
37. 1. What professional collaborative practices can Mrs. Jacobs
use to help her students with special learning, behavior, and
language needs succeed in the general education classroom?
How can she develop home-school communication
effectively? (Chapter 3)
2. Do you agree that Ms. Grelak should refer Allen for a special
education evaluation? Why or why not? (Chapter 4)
Rubric grades :
3 pts-This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeQuality of
Content
Advanced
Candidate’s response is thorough, addressing all points raised in
the guiding question
3 pts-Quality of Argument
Advanced
All of the arguments in the candidate’s response are presented
in clear and comprehensible fashion
3 pts-Length of Response
Advanced
Length of response to each question is 200-250 words
Resource’s:
4.1: Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Students(available on
page 103 of the Interactive eBook)
4.2: Assessment Challenges(available on page 111 of the
Interactive eBook)
4.3: Culturally Responsive Teaching(available on page 118 of
the Interactive eBook)
Article 1:Parette, H. P., & Petch-Hogan, B. (2000).
Approaching families: Facilitating culturally/linguistically
diverse family involvement.
38. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 33(2), 4–10.
doi:10.1177/004005990003300201Links to an external site.
Abstract: This article discusses the benefits, supported
literature, and best-practice strategies for engaging families
from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. A
practical set of questioning strategies is provided for enhancing
family participation in the decision-making process (p. 6) as
well as an overview of family-centered considerations for IEP
team members.
https://edge.sagepub.com/bryant2e/student-resources-0/chapter-
4/flashcards
If you purchased access or redeemed a code for the eBook,
you can read Chapter 4 here
Links to an external site..
Article 1:Malone, D. M., & Gallagher, P. A. (2010). Special
education teachers’ attitudes and perceptions of teamwork.
Remedial and Special Education, 31(5), 330–342.
doi:10.1177/0741932509338362Links to an external site.
Abstract: One hundred and eighty-four special education
teachers serving school-based intervention teams completed the
Attitudes About Teamwork Survey, the T
eam Characteristics Survey, and the
Team Process Perception Survey. Respondents’ regard
for the team process in planning and implementing supports for
children with disabilities was generally favorable. Similarly,
respondents’ perceptions of the performance characteristics of
the teams on which they served were generally positive.
39. Associations among items on the
Attitudes About Teamwork Survey and the
Team Characteristics Survey are reported. Finally,
respondents provided input regarding teamwork benefits and
limitations, how teamwork supports their efforts, and
recommendations for improving the effectiveness of teamwork.
Practical implications of the results and directions for further
investigation in this area are discussed.
Article 2:Whitbread, K. M., Bruder, M. B., Fleming, G., & Park,
H. J. (2007). Collaboration in special education: Parent–
professional training.
TEACHING Exceptional Children, 39(4), 6–14.
doi:10.1177/004005990703900401Links to an external site.
Abstract: This article provides a brief overview of literature and
studies and a description of a project aimed at fostering
relationships between teachers and parents in support of more
effective educational planning and implementation. The
curriculum, training procedures, and outcomes of the program
are discussed.
Article 1:Parette, H. P., & Petch-Hogan, B. (2000).
Approaching families: Facilitating culturally/linguistically
diverse family involvement.
TEACHING Exceptional Children, 33(2), 4–10.
doi:10.1177/004005990003300201Links to an external site.
Abstract: This article discusses the benefits, supported
literature, and best-practice strategies for engaging families
from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. A
practical set of questioning strategies is provided for enhancing
family participation in the decision-making process (p. 6) as
well as an overview of family-centered considerations for IEP
team members.
40. Culturally Responsive Education: Addressing DiversityLinks to
an external site.
Description: This IES webinar video provides information on
research-based, culturally responsive practices for students from
diverse backgrounds.
Identifying and Supporting Students With Learning
DisabilitiesLinks to an external site.
Description: This video provides an overview of the challenges
in and importance of identifying students with learning
disabilities.
Evaluation of Children With Suspected DisabilitiesLinks to an
external site.
Description: This video is the first in a multipart presentation
on the evaluation and identification of students with
disabilities.