The document discusses the effectiveness of the U.S. "War on Terror" since the 9/11 attacks and debates whether the military or diplomacy should be the primary foreign policy tool used to combat terrorism and keep the public safe from foreign and domestic threats. It asks if the "War on Terror" has been successful based on what criteria, and what else U.S. leaders could do to protect citizens from terrorists.

1. The terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001 forever changed
U.S. foreign and domestic policy. Has the "War on Terror" been
largely successful or not? By what criteria has it been effective
or not? What else could U.S. leaders do to make sure that the
general public is safe from either foreign or domestic
terrorists? Should the U.S. continue to use its military as a
prime foreign policy tool or should more diplomacy be used
first? Explain