SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 15
Download to read offline
Page 1

International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey
ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013
Absolutes/col percents

Table 1
Q.X What do you think of the quality of television programmes overall in <country>?
Base: All respondents
Country
Total
Unweighted base

Germany Spain France

7035

501

502

Weighted base

7035

501

502

NET: Good quality

3135
176
115
45% 35% 23%

Very good quality

(+2)

Fairly good quality

(+1) 2641
151
106
38% 30% 21%

Neither good quality nor poor quality

494
7%

24
5%

9
2%

(0) 1978
197
160
28% 39% 32%

Fairly poor quality

(-1) 1276
18%

87
157
17% 31%

Very poor quality

(-2)

33
7%

NET: Poor quality

519
7%

UK

Italy

500

503

501

500

503

501

140
362
126
28% 72% 25%
9
2%

505

500

502

500

508

506

507

500

2018

3009

500

505

500

502

500

508

506

507

500

2018

3009

285
57%

229
197 278
124
224 307 230 343
695
1388
45%
39% 55% 25% 44% 61% 45% 69% 34%
46%

131
290
118
26% 58% 24%

256
51%

198
178 228
106
212 230 190 246
626
1205
39%
36% 45% 21% 42% 46% 38% 49% 31%
40%

204
41%

69
166
14% 33%

135
27%

132
184 101
195
136
26%
37% 20% 39% 27%

115
23%

51
147
10% 29%

54
11%

98
19%

86
17%

15
3%

57
11%

23
5%

36
7%

22
4%

66
204
13% 41%

77
15%

1795
121
225
26% 24% 45%

150
30%
6
1%

6
1%

5
1%

3
1%

31
6%

19
4%

50
10%

18
4%

12
2%

77
15%

39
8%

97
19%

69
3%

183
6%

87 131
17% 26%

82
593
16% 29%

920
31%

87
118
102
17% 24% 20%

67
13%

82
16%

23
489
5% 24%

491
16%

33
7%

35
7%

60
12%

4
227
1% 11%

165
5%

134
109 120
173
145 103 142
26%
22% 24% 35% 28% 20% 28%

27
716
5% 35%

656
22%

10
2%

11
2%

3
1%

55
11%

8
2%

42
8%

Don't know

127
2%

Mean

0.19

0.09

-0.34

-0.07

0.71

-0.26

0.43

0.18

0.17

0.35

-0.18

0.10

0.49

0.13

0.90

-0.09

0.25

Standard deviation
Standard error

1.06
0.01

0.97
0.04

1.02
0.05

0.92
0.04

0.94
0.04

1.00
0.04

0.93
0.04

1.05
0.05

0.92
0.04

1.08
0.05

1.01
0.05

1.02
0.05

1.12
0.05

1.15
0.05

0.82
0.04

1.07
0.02

0.99
0.02

Prepared by Populus

2
*

North
-ern
Europe

29
6%

35
7%

8
2%

500

USA Brazil UAE

Latin
(Net)

8
2%

68
14%

72
14%

Nether
Den- AustPort-lands Sweden mark ralia Japan ugal

3
1%

9
2%

4
1%

48
10%

14
1%

44
1%
Page 2

International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey
ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013
Absolutes/col percents

Table 2
Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in Germany is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE
Base: All Germany respondents
Channel

Das Erste

ZDF

RTL

SAT 1

ProSieben

Vox

Unweighted base

501

501

501

501

501

501

Weighted base

501

501

501

501

501

501

NET: Good quality

307
61%

304
61%

154
31%

150
30%

158
31%

159
32%

Very good quality

(+2)

80
16%

87
17%

41
8%

35
7%

43
8%

27
5%

Fairly good quality

(+1)

226
45%

217
43%

113
22%

116
23%

115
23%

131
26%

(0)

125
25%

123
25%

177
35%

196
39%

193
39%

198
40%

Fairly poor quality

(-1)

32
6%

39
8%

98
20%

99
20%

87
17%

80
16%

Very poor quality

(-2)

18
4%

16
3%

58
12%

38
8%

40
8%

36
7%

NET: Poor quality

51
10%

56
11%

157
31%

137
27%

127
25%

116
23%

Don't know

19
4%

19
4%

13
3%

17
3%

23
5%

28
6%

Neither good quality nor poor quality

Mean

0.66

0.66

-0.04

0.02

0.07

0.07

Standard deviation
Standard error

0.96
0.04

0.98
0.04

1.12
0.05

1.02
0.05

1.06
0.05

0.99
0.05

Prepared by Populus
Page 3

International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey
ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013
Absolutes/col percents

Table 3
Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in Denmark is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE
Base: All Denmark respondents
Channel

DR1

TV2

Unweighted base

500

500

Weighted base

500

500

NET: Good quality

262
52%

222
44%

Very good quality

(+2)

52
10%

45
9%

Fairly good quality

(+1)

210
42%

176
35%

(0)

149
30%

171
34%

Fairly poor quality

(-1)

54
11%

64
13%

Very poor quality

(-2)

23
5%

21
4%

NET: Poor quality

77
15%

85
17%

Don't know

12
2%

22
4%

Neither good quality nor poor quality

Mean

0.44

0.34

Standard deviation
Standard error

0.98
0.04

0.97
0.04

Prepared by Populus
Page 4

International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey
ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013
Absolutes/col percents

Table 4
Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in Spain is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE
Base: All Spain respondents
Channel

La 1 (formerly
TVE1)

Telecinco
(formerly known
as Tele5)

Antena 3

Cuatro

La Sexta

Unweighted base

502

502

502

502

502

Weighted base

502

502

502

502

502

NET: Good quality

232
46%

60
12%

210
42%

197
39%

228
45%

Very good quality

(+2)

31
6%

11
2%

33
7%

26
5%

49
10%

Fairly good quality

(+1)

200
40%

50
10%

177
35%

170
34%

179
36%

(0)

167
33%

105
21%

176
35%

195
39%

179
36%

Fairly poor quality

(-1)

66
13%

127
25%

83
16%

66
13%

52
10%

Very poor quality

(-2)

33
7%

202
40%

26
5%

28
6%

29
6%

99
20%

329
66%

109
22%

94
19%

80
16%

5
1%

8
2%

7
1%

17
3%

14
3%

Neither good quality nor poor quality

NET: Poor quality
Don't know
Mean

0.26

-0.93

0.22

0.21

0.34

Standard deviation
Standard error

0.99
0.04

1.10
0.05

0.98
0.04

0.95
0.04

1.00
0.05

Prepared by Populus
Page 5

International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey
ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013
Absolutes/col percents

Table 5
Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in France is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE
Base: All France respondents
France 2

Channel
France 3
TF1

M6

Unweighted base

500

500

500

500

Weighted base

500

500

500

500

NET: Good quality

264
53%

256
51%

182
36%

211
42%

Very good quality

(+2)

29
6%

23
5%

39
8%

33
7%

Fairly good quality

(+1)

235
47%

233
47%

143
29%

178
36%

(0)

149
30%

157
31%

155
31%

192
38%

Fairly poor quality

(-1)

60
12%

53
11%

97
19%

62
12%

Very poor quality

(-2)

11
2%

18
4%

55
11%

22
4%

NET: Poor quality

71
14%

71
14%

152
30%

84
17%

Don't know

16
3%

16
3%

11
2%

13
3%

Neither good quality nor poor quality

Mean

0.44

0.39

0.03

0.28

Standard deviation
Standard error

0.87
0.04

0.88
0.04

1.12
0.05

0.93
0.04

Prepared by Populus
Page 6

International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey
ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013
Absolutes/col percents

Table 6
Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in United Kingdom is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE
Base: All United Kingdom respondents
BBC One

BBC Two

Channel
ITV

Channel 4

Channel 5

Unweighted base

503

503

503

503

503

Weighted base

503

503

503

503

503

NET: Good quality

399
79%

360
71%

322
64%

307
61%

199
40%

Very good quality

(+2)

161
32%

143
29%

99
20%

67
13%

44
9%

Fairly good quality

(+1)

238
47%

216
43%

223
44%

241
48%

155
31%

(0)

52
10%

84
17%

103
20%

125
25%

150
30%

Fairly poor quality

(-1)

33
7%

35
7%

50
10%

43
9%

79
16%

Very poor quality

(-2)

11
2%

10
2%

16
3%

13
3%

41
8%

44
9%

45
9%

66
13%

56
11%

120
24%

8
2%

14
3%

12
2%

15
3%

34
7%

Neither good quality nor poor quality

NET: Poor quality
Don't know
Mean

1.02

0.92

0.69

0.63

0.17

Standard deviation
Standard error

0.95
0.04

0.97
0.04

1.01
0.05

0.92
0.04

1.09
0.05

Prepared by Populus
Page 7

International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey
ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013
Absolutes/col percents

Table 7
Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in Italy is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE
Base: All Italy respondents
Channel
Canale 5

RAI 1

RAI 2

RAI 3

Italia 1

Rete 4

Unweighted base

501

501

501

501

501

501

Weighted base

501

501

501

501

501

501

NET: Good quality

170
34%

161
32%

204
41%

180
36%

152
30%

93
19%

Very good quality

(+2)

15
3%

9
2%

33
7%

44
9%

33
7%

12
2%

Fairly good quality

(+1)

155
31%

152
30%

171
34%

136
27%

120
24%

81
16%

(0)

179
36%

200
40%

153
30%

160
32%

161
32%

159
32%

Fairly poor quality

(-1)

101
20%

88
18%

84
17%

93
19%

110
22%

115
23%

Very poor quality

(-2)

44
9%

43
9%

52
10%

61
12%

65
13%

120
24%

145
29%

131
26%

136
27%

154
31%

175
35%

235
47%

7
1%

9
2%

9
2%

7
1%

12
2%

14
3%

Neither good quality nor poor quality

NET: Poor quality
Don't know
Mean
Standard deviation
Standard error

-0.01

-0.01

0.10

0.02

-0.11

-0.51

1.00
0.04

0.95
0.04

1.10
0.05

1.15
0.05

1.12
0.05

1.11
0.05

Prepared by Populus
Page 8

International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey
ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013
Absolutes/col percents

Table 8
Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in Netherlands is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE
Base: All Netherlands respondents
Nederland 1

Nederland 2

Channel
Nederland 3

RTL4

SBS6

Unweighted base

500

500

500

500

500

Weighted base

500

500

500

500

500

NET: Good quality

353
71%

284
57%

302
60%

280
56%

212
42%

Very good quality

(+2)

90
18%

68
14%

70
14%

78
16%

60
12%

Fairly good quality

(+1)

263
53%

216
43%

232
46%

202
40%

152
30%

(0)

95
19%

128
26%

123
25%

116
23%

154
31%

Fairly poor quality

(-1)

15
3%

32
6%

26
5%

58
12%

73
15%

Very poor quality

(-2)

8
2%

15
3%

13
3%

31
6%

46
9%

NET: Poor quality

23
5%

47
9%

39
8%

89
18%

119
24%

Don't know

29
6%

41
8%

36
7%

15
3%

15
3%

Neither good quality nor poor quality

Mean

0.87

0.63

0.69

0.49

0.22

Standard deviation
Standard error

0.81
0.04

0.93
0.04

0.89
0.04

1.09
0.05

1.14
0.05

Prepared by Populus
Page 9

International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey
ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013
Absolutes/col percents

Table 9
Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in Portugal is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE
Base: All Portugal respondents
RTP1

Channel
TVI

SIC

Unweighted base

508

508

508

Weighted base

508

508

508

NET: Good quality

265
52%

190
37%

253
50%

Very good quality

(+2)

35
7%

49
10%

46
9%

Fairly good quality

(+1)

230
45%

141
28%

206
41%

(0)

151
30%

125
25%

150
29%

Fairly poor quality

(-1)

68
13%

105
21%

79
16%

Very poor quality

(-2)

15
3%

82
16%

22
4%

83
16%

187
37%

101
20%

8
2%

6
1%

5
1%

Neither good quality nor poor quality

NET: Poor quality
Don't know
Mean

0.41

-0.06

0.35

Standard deviation
Standard error

0.91
0.04

1.24
0.06

0.99
0.04

Prepared by Populus
Page 10

International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey
ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013
Absolutes/col percents

Table 10
Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in Sweden is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE
Base: All Sweden respondents
Channel
TV3

SVT1

SVT2

Unweighted base

505

505

505

TV4
505

Kanal 5
505

Weighted base

505

505

505

505

505

NET: Good quality

300
59%

272
54%

134
27%

243
48%

163
32%

Very good quality

(+2)

101
20%

87
17%

37
7%

56
11%

48
10%

Fairly good quality

(+1)

199
39%

185
37%

98
19%

187
37%

114
23%

(0)

98
19%

110
22%

155
31%

134
27%

158
31%

Fairly poor quality

(-1)

50
10%

53
10%

102
20%

81
16%

81
16%

Very poor quality

(-2)

33
7%

42
8%

65
13%

28
6%

46
9%

NET: Poor quality

84
17%

95
19%

166
33%

109
22%

127
25%

Don't know

23
5%

28
6%

50
10%

18
4%

58
11%

Neither good quality nor poor quality

Mean

0.59

0.47

-0.13

0.33

0.09

Standard deviation
Standard error

1.14
0.05

1.17
0.05

1.15
0.05

1.06
0.05

1.13
0.05

Prepared by Populus
Page 11

International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey
ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013
Absolutes/col percents

Table 11
Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in United States is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE
Base: All United States respondents
Channel

PBS

ABC

NBC

CBS

Unweighted base

506

506

506

506

Weighted base

506

506

506

506

NET: Good quality

328
65%

320
63%

313
62%

333
66%

Very good quality

(+2)

152
30%

107
21%

107
21%

137
27%

Fairly good quality

(+1)

176
35%

213
42%

206
41%

196
39%

(0)

80
16%

100
20%

97
19%

91
18%

Fairly poor quality

(-1)

24
5%

49
10%

46
9%

41
8%

Very poor quality

(-2)

16
3%

20
4%

29
6%

19
4%

NET: Poor quality

39
8%

69
14%

74
15%

60
12%

Don't know

59
12%

16
3%

22
4%

21
4%

Neither good quality nor poor quality

Mean

0.95

0.69

0.65

0.81

Standard deviation
Standard error

1.02
0.05

1.05
0.05

1.10
0.05

1.06
0.05

Prepared by Populus
Page 12

International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey
ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013
Absolutes/col percents

Table 12
Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in Brazil is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE
Base: All Brazil respondents
Channel

TV Cultura
Unweighted base

507

TV Brasil
507

Globo

Record

507

507

SBT
507

Bandeirantes
(also known as
Band)
507

Weighted base

507

507

507

507

507

507

NET: Good quality

383
76%

247
49%

260
51%

222
44%

219
43%

241
48%

Very good quality

(+2)

170
34%

72
14%

99
19%

78
15%

62
12%

56
11%

Fairly good quality

(+1)

213
42%

175
35%

162
32%

144
28%

158
31%

185
36%

(0)

74
15%

112
22%

98
19%

149
29%

165
33%

175
34%

Fairly poor quality

(-1)

14
3%

31
6%

80
16%

73
14%

74
15%

54
11%

Very poor quality

(-2)

7
1%

19
4%

68
13%

59
12%

46
9%

30
6%

NET: Poor quality

21
4%

50
10%

148
29%

132
26%

120
24%

84
17%

Don't know

29
6%

98
19%

1
*

4
1%

3
1%

7
1%

Neither good quality nor poor quality

Mean

1.10

0.61

0.28

0.22

0.23

0.37

Standard deviation
Standard error

0.87
0.04

1.01
0.05

1.31
0.06

1.22
0.05

1.12
0.05

1.02
0.05

Prepared by Populus
Page 13

International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey
ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013
Absolutes/col percents

Table 13
Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in Australia is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE
Base: All Australia respondents
ABC 1

Channel
Channel 7
Channel 9

Channel Ten

Unweighted base

502

502

502

502

Weighted base

502

502

502

502

NET: Good quality

346
69%

283
56%

268
53%

240
48%

Very good quality

(+2)

149
30%

74
15%

75
15%

58
12%

Fairly good quality

(+1)

198
39%

209
42%

193
39%

182
36%

(0)

95
19%

124
25%

118
23%

146
29%

Fairly poor quality

(-1)

21
4%

58
12%

76
15%

75
15%

Very poor quality

(-2)

7
1%

25
5%

28
6%

25
5%

NET: Poor quality

28
6%

83
17%

104
21%

100
20%

Don't know

33
7%

12
2%

12
2%

15
3%

Neither good quality nor poor quality

Mean

0.98

0.51

0.43

0.36

Standard deviation
Standard error

0.92
0.04

1.05
0.05

1.10
0.05

1.04
0.05

Prepared by Populus
Page 14

International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey
ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013
Absolutes/col percents

Table 14
Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in Japan is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE
Base: All Japan respondents
Channel

NHK1

Fuji TV

NTV

Unweighted base

500

500

500

TBS
500

tv asahi
500

TV Tokyo
500

Weighted base

500

500

500

500

500

500

NET: Good quality

255
51%

79
16%

99
20%

114
23%

121
24%

117
23%

Very good quality

(+2)

50
10%

9
2%

10
2%

9
2%

10
2%

13
3%

Fairly good quality

(+1)

205
41%

70
14%

89
18%

105
21%

111
22%

104
21%

(0)

177
35%

212
42%

259
52%

246
49%

252
50%

218
44%

Fairly poor quality

(-1)

32
6%

114
23%

95
19%

85
17%

75
15%

62
12%

Very poor quality

(-2)

16
3%

74
15%

28
6%

33
7%

28
6%

14
3%

NET: Poor quality

48
10%

188
38%

123
25%

118
24%

103
21%

76
15%

Don't know

20
4%

21
4%

19
4%

22
4%

24
5%

89
18%

Neither good quality nor poor quality

Mean

0.50

-0.36

-0.09

-0.06

*

0.10

Standard deviation
Standard error

0.89
0.04

0.97
0.04

0.83
0.04

0.86
0.04

0.84
0.04

0.81
0.04

Prepared by Populus
Page 15

International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey
ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013
Absolutes/col percents

Table 15
Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in UAE is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE
Base: All UAE respondents
Dubai TV

MBC 2

Channel
Al Jazeera

MBC 1

Al Arabiya

Unweighted base

500

500

500

500

500

Weighted base

500

500

500

500

500

NET: Good quality

337
67%

347
69%

282
56%

289
58%

209
42%

Very good quality

(+2)

142
28%

140
28%

131
26%

92
18%

56
11%

Fairly good quality

(+1)

195
39%

207
41%

151
30%

197
39%

153
31%

(0)

72
14%

67
13%

77
15%

78
16%

93
19%

Fairly poor quality

(-1)

11
2%

14
3%

16
3%

26
5%

33
7%

Very poor quality

(-2)

4
1%

5
1%

25
5%

7
1%

16
3%

NET: Poor quality

15
3%

18
4%

41
8%

33
7%

48
10%

Don't know

76
15%

67
13%

100
20%

100
20%

149
30%

Neither good quality nor poor quality

Mean

1.08

1.07

0.86

0.85

0.57

Standard deviation
Standard error

0.83
0.04

0.84
0.04

1.11
0.06

0.91
0.05

1.01
0.06

Prepared by Populus

More Related Content

Similar to Tv quality-2

Newspapers are a growth business
Newspapers are a growth businessNewspapers are a growth business
Newspapers are a growth businessMarek Miller
 
Renishaw results 14_presentation
Renishaw results 14_presentationRenishaw results 14_presentation
Renishaw results 14_presentationCompany Spotlight
 
COMPLETE Phase 1, Complete (Anonymous) - FREE Survey Results chart pics
COMPLETE Phase 1, Complete (Anonymous) - FREE Survey Results chart picsCOMPLETE Phase 1, Complete (Anonymous) - FREE Survey Results chart pics
COMPLETE Phase 1, Complete (Anonymous) - FREE Survey Results chart picsExopolitics Hungary
 
CCCS Pipeline Presentation June 2013
CCCS Pipeline Presentation June 2013CCCS Pipeline Presentation June 2013
CCCS Pipeline Presentation June 2013cccscoetc
 
Recent labour market developments and reforms in OECD countries
Recent labour market developments and reforms in OECD countriesRecent labour market developments and reforms in OECD countries
Recent labour market developments and reforms in OECD countriesRockwool Fonden
 
Indicadores zona escolar 06 dic 2015
Indicadores zona escolar 06 dic 2015Indicadores zona escolar 06 dic 2015
Indicadores zona escolar 06 dic 2015David Mrs
 
Ferrovial Investors Presentation Jan Sep 2015
Ferrovial Investors Presentation Jan Sep 2015Ferrovial Investors Presentation Jan Sep 2015
Ferrovial Investors Presentation Jan Sep 2015Ferrovial
 
Sun tv ru2 qfy2011-291010
Sun tv  ru2 qfy2011-291010Sun tv  ru2 qfy2011-291010
Sun tv ru2 qfy2011-291010Angel Broking
 
An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for England- Nancy Devlin and Ben Van Hout
An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for England- Nancy Devlin and Ben Van HoutAn EQ-5D-5L Value Set for England- Nancy Devlin and Ben Van Hout
An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for England- Nancy Devlin and Ben Van HoutScHARR HEDS
 
The online advertising landscape in Europe 2013
The online advertising landscape in Europe 2013The online advertising landscape in Europe 2013
The online advertising landscape in Europe 2013IAB Europe
 
Nils Flaatten's Presentation at Cap40 Business Wednesday
Nils Flaatten's Presentation at Cap40 Business WednesdayNils Flaatten's Presentation at Cap40 Business Wednesday
Nils Flaatten's Presentation at Cap40 Business WednesdayCap40
 
Babson College Fund Quant Semester Report December 2013
Babson College Fund Quant Semester Report December 2013Babson College Fund Quant Semester Report December 2013
Babson College Fund Quant Semester Report December 2013Lundun McCall-Mazza
 
Tony Twyman award paper 2012 ’Video across platforms’ - asi 2012 TV Sy…
Tony Twyman award paper 2012 ’Video across platforms’ - asi 2012 TV Sy…Tony Twyman award paper 2012 ’Video across platforms’ - asi 2012 TV Sy…
Tony Twyman award paper 2012 ’Video across platforms’ - asi 2012 TV Sy…Mike Sainsbury
 

Similar to Tv quality-2 (20)

Newspapers are a growth business
Newspapers are a growth businessNewspapers are a growth business
Newspapers are a growth business
 
OECD Employment Outlook 2015 - Selected Figures
OECD Employment Outlook 2015 - Selected FiguresOECD Employment Outlook 2015 - Selected Figures
OECD Employment Outlook 2015 - Selected Figures
 
Mtg q3 presentation final updated front 2
Mtg q3 presentation final updated front 2Mtg q3 presentation final updated front 2
Mtg q3 presentation final updated front 2
 
Renishaw results 14_presentation
Renishaw results 14_presentationRenishaw results 14_presentation
Renishaw results 14_presentation
 
COMPLETE Phase 1, Complete (Anonymous) - FREE Survey Results
COMPLETE Phase 1, Complete (Anonymous) - FREE Survey ResultsCOMPLETE Phase 1, Complete (Anonymous) - FREE Survey Results
COMPLETE Phase 1, Complete (Anonymous) - FREE Survey Results
 
COMPLETE Phase 1, Complete (Anonymous) - FREE Survey Results chart pics
COMPLETE Phase 1, Complete (Anonymous) - FREE Survey Results chart picsCOMPLETE Phase 1, Complete (Anonymous) - FREE Survey Results chart pics
COMPLETE Phase 1, Complete (Anonymous) - FREE Survey Results chart pics
 
Mtg q3 presentation final
Mtg q3 presentation finalMtg q3 presentation final
Mtg q3 presentation final
 
Mtg q3 presentation final v2
Mtg q3 presentation final v2Mtg q3 presentation final v2
Mtg q3 presentation final v2
 
WENA S&D GCDP 1-15 May 2014
WENA S&D GCDP 1-15 May 2014WENA S&D GCDP 1-15 May 2014
WENA S&D GCDP 1-15 May 2014
 
CCCS Pipeline Presentation June 2013
CCCS Pipeline Presentation June 2013CCCS Pipeline Presentation June 2013
CCCS Pipeline Presentation June 2013
 
Recent labour market developments and reforms in OECD countries
Recent labour market developments and reforms in OECD countriesRecent labour market developments and reforms in OECD countries
Recent labour market developments and reforms in OECD countries
 
Indicadores zona escolar 06 dic 2015
Indicadores zona escolar 06 dic 2015Indicadores zona escolar 06 dic 2015
Indicadores zona escolar 06 dic 2015
 
Ferrovial Investors Presentation Jan Sep 2015
Ferrovial Investors Presentation Jan Sep 2015Ferrovial Investors Presentation Jan Sep 2015
Ferrovial Investors Presentation Jan Sep 2015
 
Sun tv ru2 qfy2011-291010
Sun tv  ru2 qfy2011-291010Sun tv  ru2 qfy2011-291010
Sun tv ru2 qfy2011-291010
 
An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for England- Nancy Devlin and Ben Van Hout
An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for England- Nancy Devlin and Ben Van HoutAn EQ-5D-5L Value Set for England- Nancy Devlin and Ben Van Hout
An EQ-5D-5L Value Set for England- Nancy Devlin and Ben Van Hout
 
2015 Q3 Media Quality Report
2015 Q3 Media Quality Report2015 Q3 Media Quality Report
2015 Q3 Media Quality Report
 
The online advertising landscape in Europe 2013
The online advertising landscape in Europe 2013The online advertising landscape in Europe 2013
The online advertising landscape in Europe 2013
 
Nils Flaatten's Presentation at Cap40 Business Wednesday
Nils Flaatten's Presentation at Cap40 Business WednesdayNils Flaatten's Presentation at Cap40 Business Wednesday
Nils Flaatten's Presentation at Cap40 Business Wednesday
 
Babson College Fund Quant Semester Report December 2013
Babson College Fund Quant Semester Report December 2013Babson College Fund Quant Semester Report December 2013
Babson College Fund Quant Semester Report December 2013
 
Tony Twyman award paper 2012 ’Video across platforms’ - asi 2012 TV Sy…
Tony Twyman award paper 2012 ’Video across platforms’ - asi 2012 TV Sy…Tony Twyman award paper 2012 ’Video across platforms’ - asi 2012 TV Sy…
Tony Twyman award paper 2012 ’Video across platforms’ - asi 2012 TV Sy…
 

More from Gabriel Priolli

Arrancada para a Liderança
Arrancada para a LiderançaArrancada para a Liderança
Arrancada para a LiderançaGabriel Priolli
 
"O campeão de audiência" está de volta
"O campeão de audiência" está de volta"O campeão de audiência" está de volta
"O campeão de audiência" está de voltaGabriel Priolli
 
Severo Fournier - Assalto ao Guanabara
Severo Fournier - Assalto ao GuanabaraSevero Fournier - Assalto ao Guanabara
Severo Fournier - Assalto ao GuanabaraGabriel Priolli
 
Perfil ideologico-dos-brasileiros
Perfil ideologico-dos-brasileirosPerfil ideologico-dos-brasileiros
Perfil ideologico-dos-brasileirosGabriel Priolli
 
Shooting war hq integral - trad port
Shooting war   hq integral - trad portShooting war   hq integral - trad port
Shooting war hq integral - trad portGabriel Priolli
 

More from Gabriel Priolli (11)

Arrancada para a Liderança
Arrancada para a LiderançaArrancada para a Liderança
Arrancada para a Liderança
 
"O campeão de audiência" está de volta
"O campeão de audiência" está de volta"O campeão de audiência" está de volta
"O campeão de audiência" está de volta
 
A marca do jato
A marca do jatoA marca do jato
A marca do jato
 
Folder pmll mail
Folder pmll mailFolder pmll mail
Folder pmll mail
 
Luc0002
Luc0002Luc0002
Luc0002
 
Almino entrevista
Almino   entrevistaAlmino   entrevista
Almino entrevista
 
Severo Fournier - Assalto ao Guanabara
Severo Fournier - Assalto ao GuanabaraSevero Fournier - Assalto ao Guanabara
Severo Fournier - Assalto ao Guanabara
 
Perfil ideologico-dos-brasileiros
Perfil ideologico-dos-brasileirosPerfil ideologico-dos-brasileiros
Perfil ideologico-dos-brasileiros
 
Homem no espaço
Homem no espaçoHomem no espaço
Homem no espaço
 
Shooting war hq integral - trad port
Shooting war   hq integral - trad portShooting war   hq integral - trad port
Shooting war hq integral - trad port
 
Campanha boa escola
Campanha boa escolaCampanha boa escola
Campanha boa escola
 

Recently uploaded

AP Election Survey 2024: TDP-Janasena-BJP Alliance Set To Sweep Victory
AP Election Survey 2024: TDP-Janasena-BJP Alliance Set To Sweep VictoryAP Election Survey 2024: TDP-Janasena-BJP Alliance Set To Sweep Victory
AP Election Survey 2024: TDP-Janasena-BJP Alliance Set To Sweep Victoryanjanibaddipudi1
 
26042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
26042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf26042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
26042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 
25042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
25042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf25042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
25042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
 
Brief biography of Julius Robert Oppenheimer
Brief biography of Julius Robert OppenheimerBrief biography of Julius Robert Oppenheimer
Brief biography of Julius Robert OppenheimerOmarCabrera39
 
Israel Palestine Conflict, The issue and historical context!
Israel Palestine Conflict, The issue and historical context!Israel Palestine Conflict, The issue and historical context!
Israel Palestine Conflict, The issue and historical context!Krish109503
 
Nurturing Families, Empowering Lives: TDP's Vision for Family Welfare in Andh...
Nurturing Families, Empowering Lives: TDP's Vision for Family Welfare in Andh...Nurturing Families, Empowering Lives: TDP's Vision for Family Welfare in Andh...
Nurturing Families, Empowering Lives: TDP's Vision for Family Welfare in Andh...narsireddynannuri1
 
Roberts Rules Cheat Sheet for LD4 Precinct Commiteemen
Roberts Rules Cheat Sheet for LD4 Precinct CommiteemenRoberts Rules Cheat Sheet for LD4 Precinct Commiteemen
Roberts Rules Cheat Sheet for LD4 Precinct Commiteemenkfjstone13
 
Minto-Morley Reforms 1909 (constitution).pptx
Minto-Morley Reforms 1909 (constitution).pptxMinto-Morley Reforms 1909 (constitution).pptx
Minto-Morley Reforms 1909 (constitution).pptxAwaiskhalid96
 
Defensa de JOH insiste que testimonio de analista de la DEA es falso y solici...
Defensa de JOH insiste que testimonio de analista de la DEA es falso y solici...Defensa de JOH insiste que testimonio de analista de la DEA es falso y solici...
Defensa de JOH insiste que testimonio de analista de la DEA es falso y solici...AlexisTorres963861
 
College Call Girls Kolhapur Aanya 8617697112 Independent Escort Service Kolhapur
College Call Girls Kolhapur Aanya 8617697112 Independent Escort Service KolhapurCollege Call Girls Kolhapur Aanya 8617697112 Independent Escort Service Kolhapur
College Call Girls Kolhapur Aanya 8617697112 Independent Escort Service KolhapurCall girls in Ahmedabad High profile
 
2024 04 03 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes FINAL.docx
2024 04 03 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes FINAL.docx2024 04 03 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes FINAL.docx
2024 04 03 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes FINAL.docxkfjstone13
 
VIP Girls Available Call or WhatsApp 9711199012
VIP Girls Available Call or WhatsApp 9711199012VIP Girls Available Call or WhatsApp 9711199012
VIP Girls Available Call or WhatsApp 9711199012ankitnayak356677
 
Call Girls in Mira Road Mumbai ( Neha 09892124323 ) College Escorts Service i...
Call Girls in Mira Road Mumbai ( Neha 09892124323 ) College Escorts Service i...Call Girls in Mira Road Mumbai ( Neha 09892124323 ) College Escorts Service i...
Call Girls in Mira Road Mumbai ( Neha 09892124323 ) College Escorts Service i...Pooja Nehwal
 
Dynamics of Destructive Polarisation in Mainstream and Social Media: The Case...
Dynamics of Destructive Polarisation in Mainstream and Social Media: The Case...Dynamics of Destructive Polarisation in Mainstream and Social Media: The Case...
Dynamics of Destructive Polarisation in Mainstream and Social Media: The Case...Axel Bruns
 
Referendum Party 2024 Election Manifesto
Referendum Party 2024 Election ManifestoReferendum Party 2024 Election Manifesto
Referendum Party 2024 Election ManifestoSABC News
 
如何办理(BU学位证书)美国贝翰文大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(BU学位证书)美国贝翰文大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(BU学位证书)美国贝翰文大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(BU学位证书)美国贝翰文大学毕业证学位证书Fi L
 
Vashi Escorts, {Pooja 09892124323}, Vashi Call Girls
Vashi Escorts, {Pooja 09892124323}, Vashi Call GirlsVashi Escorts, {Pooja 09892124323}, Vashi Call Girls
Vashi Escorts, {Pooja 09892124323}, Vashi Call GirlsPooja Nehwal
 
KAHULUGAN AT KAHALAGAHAN NG GAWAING PANSIBIKO.pptx
KAHULUGAN AT KAHALAGAHAN NG GAWAING PANSIBIKO.pptxKAHULUGAN AT KAHALAGAHAN NG GAWAING PANSIBIKO.pptx
KAHULUGAN AT KAHALAGAHAN NG GAWAING PANSIBIKO.pptxjohnandrewcarlos
 
Different Frontiers of Social Media War in Indonesia Elections 2024
Different Frontiers of Social Media War in Indonesia Elections 2024Different Frontiers of Social Media War in Indonesia Elections 2024
Different Frontiers of Social Media War in Indonesia Elections 2024Ismail Fahmi
 
How Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdf
How Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdfHow Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdf
How Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdfLorenzo Lemes
 

Recently uploaded (20)

AP Election Survey 2024: TDP-Janasena-BJP Alliance Set To Sweep Victory
AP Election Survey 2024: TDP-Janasena-BJP Alliance Set To Sweep VictoryAP Election Survey 2024: TDP-Janasena-BJP Alliance Set To Sweep Victory
AP Election Survey 2024: TDP-Janasena-BJP Alliance Set To Sweep Victory
 
26042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
26042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf26042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
26042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
25042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
25042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf25042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
25042024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdf
 
Brief biography of Julius Robert Oppenheimer
Brief biography of Julius Robert OppenheimerBrief biography of Julius Robert Oppenheimer
Brief biography of Julius Robert Oppenheimer
 
Israel Palestine Conflict, The issue and historical context!
Israel Palestine Conflict, The issue and historical context!Israel Palestine Conflict, The issue and historical context!
Israel Palestine Conflict, The issue and historical context!
 
Nurturing Families, Empowering Lives: TDP's Vision for Family Welfare in Andh...
Nurturing Families, Empowering Lives: TDP's Vision for Family Welfare in Andh...Nurturing Families, Empowering Lives: TDP's Vision for Family Welfare in Andh...
Nurturing Families, Empowering Lives: TDP's Vision for Family Welfare in Andh...
 
Roberts Rules Cheat Sheet for LD4 Precinct Commiteemen
Roberts Rules Cheat Sheet for LD4 Precinct CommiteemenRoberts Rules Cheat Sheet for LD4 Precinct Commiteemen
Roberts Rules Cheat Sheet for LD4 Precinct Commiteemen
 
Minto-Morley Reforms 1909 (constitution).pptx
Minto-Morley Reforms 1909 (constitution).pptxMinto-Morley Reforms 1909 (constitution).pptx
Minto-Morley Reforms 1909 (constitution).pptx
 
Defensa de JOH insiste que testimonio de analista de la DEA es falso y solici...
Defensa de JOH insiste que testimonio de analista de la DEA es falso y solici...Defensa de JOH insiste que testimonio de analista de la DEA es falso y solici...
Defensa de JOH insiste que testimonio de analista de la DEA es falso y solici...
 
College Call Girls Kolhapur Aanya 8617697112 Independent Escort Service Kolhapur
College Call Girls Kolhapur Aanya 8617697112 Independent Escort Service KolhapurCollege Call Girls Kolhapur Aanya 8617697112 Independent Escort Service Kolhapur
College Call Girls Kolhapur Aanya 8617697112 Independent Escort Service Kolhapur
 
2024 04 03 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes FINAL.docx
2024 04 03 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes FINAL.docx2024 04 03 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes FINAL.docx
2024 04 03 AZ GOP LD4 Gen Meeting Minutes FINAL.docx
 
VIP Girls Available Call or WhatsApp 9711199012
VIP Girls Available Call or WhatsApp 9711199012VIP Girls Available Call or WhatsApp 9711199012
VIP Girls Available Call or WhatsApp 9711199012
 
Call Girls in Mira Road Mumbai ( Neha 09892124323 ) College Escorts Service i...
Call Girls in Mira Road Mumbai ( Neha 09892124323 ) College Escorts Service i...Call Girls in Mira Road Mumbai ( Neha 09892124323 ) College Escorts Service i...
Call Girls in Mira Road Mumbai ( Neha 09892124323 ) College Escorts Service i...
 
Dynamics of Destructive Polarisation in Mainstream and Social Media: The Case...
Dynamics of Destructive Polarisation in Mainstream and Social Media: The Case...Dynamics of Destructive Polarisation in Mainstream and Social Media: The Case...
Dynamics of Destructive Polarisation in Mainstream and Social Media: The Case...
 
Referendum Party 2024 Election Manifesto
Referendum Party 2024 Election ManifestoReferendum Party 2024 Election Manifesto
Referendum Party 2024 Election Manifesto
 
如何办理(BU学位证书)美国贝翰文大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(BU学位证书)美国贝翰文大学毕业证学位证书如何办理(BU学位证书)美国贝翰文大学毕业证学位证书
如何办理(BU学位证书)美国贝翰文大学毕业证学位证书
 
Vashi Escorts, {Pooja 09892124323}, Vashi Call Girls
Vashi Escorts, {Pooja 09892124323}, Vashi Call GirlsVashi Escorts, {Pooja 09892124323}, Vashi Call Girls
Vashi Escorts, {Pooja 09892124323}, Vashi Call Girls
 
KAHULUGAN AT KAHALAGAHAN NG GAWAING PANSIBIKO.pptx
KAHULUGAN AT KAHALAGAHAN NG GAWAING PANSIBIKO.pptxKAHULUGAN AT KAHALAGAHAN NG GAWAING PANSIBIKO.pptx
KAHULUGAN AT KAHALAGAHAN NG GAWAING PANSIBIKO.pptx
 
Different Frontiers of Social Media War in Indonesia Elections 2024
Different Frontiers of Social Media War in Indonesia Elections 2024Different Frontiers of Social Media War in Indonesia Elections 2024
Different Frontiers of Social Media War in Indonesia Elections 2024
 
How Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdf
How Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdfHow Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdf
How Europe Underdeveloped Africa_walter.pdf
 

Tv quality-2

  • 1. Page 1 International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013 Absolutes/col percents Table 1 Q.X What do you think of the quality of television programmes overall in <country>? Base: All respondents Country Total Unweighted base Germany Spain France 7035 501 502 Weighted base 7035 501 502 NET: Good quality 3135 176 115 45% 35% 23% Very good quality (+2) Fairly good quality (+1) 2641 151 106 38% 30% 21% Neither good quality nor poor quality 494 7% 24 5% 9 2% (0) 1978 197 160 28% 39% 32% Fairly poor quality (-1) 1276 18% 87 157 17% 31% Very poor quality (-2) 33 7% NET: Poor quality 519 7% UK Italy 500 503 501 500 503 501 140 362 126 28% 72% 25% 9 2% 505 500 502 500 508 506 507 500 2018 3009 500 505 500 502 500 508 506 507 500 2018 3009 285 57% 229 197 278 124 224 307 230 343 695 1388 45% 39% 55% 25% 44% 61% 45% 69% 34% 46% 131 290 118 26% 58% 24% 256 51% 198 178 228 106 212 230 190 246 626 1205 39% 36% 45% 21% 42% 46% 38% 49% 31% 40% 204 41% 69 166 14% 33% 135 27% 132 184 101 195 136 26% 37% 20% 39% 27% 115 23% 51 147 10% 29% 54 11% 98 19% 86 17% 15 3% 57 11% 23 5% 36 7% 22 4% 66 204 13% 41% 77 15% 1795 121 225 26% 24% 45% 150 30% 6 1% 6 1% 5 1% 3 1% 31 6% 19 4% 50 10% 18 4% 12 2% 77 15% 39 8% 97 19% 69 3% 183 6% 87 131 17% 26% 82 593 16% 29% 920 31% 87 118 102 17% 24% 20% 67 13% 82 16% 23 489 5% 24% 491 16% 33 7% 35 7% 60 12% 4 227 1% 11% 165 5% 134 109 120 173 145 103 142 26% 22% 24% 35% 28% 20% 28% 27 716 5% 35% 656 22% 10 2% 11 2% 3 1% 55 11% 8 2% 42 8% Don't know 127 2% Mean 0.19 0.09 -0.34 -0.07 0.71 -0.26 0.43 0.18 0.17 0.35 -0.18 0.10 0.49 0.13 0.90 -0.09 0.25 Standard deviation Standard error 1.06 0.01 0.97 0.04 1.02 0.05 0.92 0.04 0.94 0.04 1.00 0.04 0.93 0.04 1.05 0.05 0.92 0.04 1.08 0.05 1.01 0.05 1.02 0.05 1.12 0.05 1.15 0.05 0.82 0.04 1.07 0.02 0.99 0.02 Prepared by Populus 2 * North -ern Europe 29 6% 35 7% 8 2% 500 USA Brazil UAE Latin (Net) 8 2% 68 14% 72 14% Nether Den- AustPort-lands Sweden mark ralia Japan ugal 3 1% 9 2% 4 1% 48 10% 14 1% 44 1%
  • 2. Page 2 International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013 Absolutes/col percents Table 2 Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in Germany is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE Base: All Germany respondents Channel Das Erste ZDF RTL SAT 1 ProSieben Vox Unweighted base 501 501 501 501 501 501 Weighted base 501 501 501 501 501 501 NET: Good quality 307 61% 304 61% 154 31% 150 30% 158 31% 159 32% Very good quality (+2) 80 16% 87 17% 41 8% 35 7% 43 8% 27 5% Fairly good quality (+1) 226 45% 217 43% 113 22% 116 23% 115 23% 131 26% (0) 125 25% 123 25% 177 35% 196 39% 193 39% 198 40% Fairly poor quality (-1) 32 6% 39 8% 98 20% 99 20% 87 17% 80 16% Very poor quality (-2) 18 4% 16 3% 58 12% 38 8% 40 8% 36 7% NET: Poor quality 51 10% 56 11% 157 31% 137 27% 127 25% 116 23% Don't know 19 4% 19 4% 13 3% 17 3% 23 5% 28 6% Neither good quality nor poor quality Mean 0.66 0.66 -0.04 0.02 0.07 0.07 Standard deviation Standard error 0.96 0.04 0.98 0.04 1.12 0.05 1.02 0.05 1.06 0.05 0.99 0.05 Prepared by Populus
  • 3. Page 3 International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013 Absolutes/col percents Table 3 Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in Denmark is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE Base: All Denmark respondents Channel DR1 TV2 Unweighted base 500 500 Weighted base 500 500 NET: Good quality 262 52% 222 44% Very good quality (+2) 52 10% 45 9% Fairly good quality (+1) 210 42% 176 35% (0) 149 30% 171 34% Fairly poor quality (-1) 54 11% 64 13% Very poor quality (-2) 23 5% 21 4% NET: Poor quality 77 15% 85 17% Don't know 12 2% 22 4% Neither good quality nor poor quality Mean 0.44 0.34 Standard deviation Standard error 0.98 0.04 0.97 0.04 Prepared by Populus
  • 4. Page 4 International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013 Absolutes/col percents Table 4 Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in Spain is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE Base: All Spain respondents Channel La 1 (formerly TVE1) Telecinco (formerly known as Tele5) Antena 3 Cuatro La Sexta Unweighted base 502 502 502 502 502 Weighted base 502 502 502 502 502 NET: Good quality 232 46% 60 12% 210 42% 197 39% 228 45% Very good quality (+2) 31 6% 11 2% 33 7% 26 5% 49 10% Fairly good quality (+1) 200 40% 50 10% 177 35% 170 34% 179 36% (0) 167 33% 105 21% 176 35% 195 39% 179 36% Fairly poor quality (-1) 66 13% 127 25% 83 16% 66 13% 52 10% Very poor quality (-2) 33 7% 202 40% 26 5% 28 6% 29 6% 99 20% 329 66% 109 22% 94 19% 80 16% 5 1% 8 2% 7 1% 17 3% 14 3% Neither good quality nor poor quality NET: Poor quality Don't know Mean 0.26 -0.93 0.22 0.21 0.34 Standard deviation Standard error 0.99 0.04 1.10 0.05 0.98 0.04 0.95 0.04 1.00 0.05 Prepared by Populus
  • 5. Page 5 International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013 Absolutes/col percents Table 5 Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in France is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE Base: All France respondents France 2 Channel France 3 TF1 M6 Unweighted base 500 500 500 500 Weighted base 500 500 500 500 NET: Good quality 264 53% 256 51% 182 36% 211 42% Very good quality (+2) 29 6% 23 5% 39 8% 33 7% Fairly good quality (+1) 235 47% 233 47% 143 29% 178 36% (0) 149 30% 157 31% 155 31% 192 38% Fairly poor quality (-1) 60 12% 53 11% 97 19% 62 12% Very poor quality (-2) 11 2% 18 4% 55 11% 22 4% NET: Poor quality 71 14% 71 14% 152 30% 84 17% Don't know 16 3% 16 3% 11 2% 13 3% Neither good quality nor poor quality Mean 0.44 0.39 0.03 0.28 Standard deviation Standard error 0.87 0.04 0.88 0.04 1.12 0.05 0.93 0.04 Prepared by Populus
  • 6. Page 6 International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013 Absolutes/col percents Table 6 Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in United Kingdom is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE Base: All United Kingdom respondents BBC One BBC Two Channel ITV Channel 4 Channel 5 Unweighted base 503 503 503 503 503 Weighted base 503 503 503 503 503 NET: Good quality 399 79% 360 71% 322 64% 307 61% 199 40% Very good quality (+2) 161 32% 143 29% 99 20% 67 13% 44 9% Fairly good quality (+1) 238 47% 216 43% 223 44% 241 48% 155 31% (0) 52 10% 84 17% 103 20% 125 25% 150 30% Fairly poor quality (-1) 33 7% 35 7% 50 10% 43 9% 79 16% Very poor quality (-2) 11 2% 10 2% 16 3% 13 3% 41 8% 44 9% 45 9% 66 13% 56 11% 120 24% 8 2% 14 3% 12 2% 15 3% 34 7% Neither good quality nor poor quality NET: Poor quality Don't know Mean 1.02 0.92 0.69 0.63 0.17 Standard deviation Standard error 0.95 0.04 0.97 0.04 1.01 0.05 0.92 0.04 1.09 0.05 Prepared by Populus
  • 7. Page 7 International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013 Absolutes/col percents Table 7 Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in Italy is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE Base: All Italy respondents Channel Canale 5 RAI 1 RAI 2 RAI 3 Italia 1 Rete 4 Unweighted base 501 501 501 501 501 501 Weighted base 501 501 501 501 501 501 NET: Good quality 170 34% 161 32% 204 41% 180 36% 152 30% 93 19% Very good quality (+2) 15 3% 9 2% 33 7% 44 9% 33 7% 12 2% Fairly good quality (+1) 155 31% 152 30% 171 34% 136 27% 120 24% 81 16% (0) 179 36% 200 40% 153 30% 160 32% 161 32% 159 32% Fairly poor quality (-1) 101 20% 88 18% 84 17% 93 19% 110 22% 115 23% Very poor quality (-2) 44 9% 43 9% 52 10% 61 12% 65 13% 120 24% 145 29% 131 26% 136 27% 154 31% 175 35% 235 47% 7 1% 9 2% 9 2% 7 1% 12 2% 14 3% Neither good quality nor poor quality NET: Poor quality Don't know Mean Standard deviation Standard error -0.01 -0.01 0.10 0.02 -0.11 -0.51 1.00 0.04 0.95 0.04 1.10 0.05 1.15 0.05 1.12 0.05 1.11 0.05 Prepared by Populus
  • 8. Page 8 International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013 Absolutes/col percents Table 8 Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in Netherlands is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE Base: All Netherlands respondents Nederland 1 Nederland 2 Channel Nederland 3 RTL4 SBS6 Unweighted base 500 500 500 500 500 Weighted base 500 500 500 500 500 NET: Good quality 353 71% 284 57% 302 60% 280 56% 212 42% Very good quality (+2) 90 18% 68 14% 70 14% 78 16% 60 12% Fairly good quality (+1) 263 53% 216 43% 232 46% 202 40% 152 30% (0) 95 19% 128 26% 123 25% 116 23% 154 31% Fairly poor quality (-1) 15 3% 32 6% 26 5% 58 12% 73 15% Very poor quality (-2) 8 2% 15 3% 13 3% 31 6% 46 9% NET: Poor quality 23 5% 47 9% 39 8% 89 18% 119 24% Don't know 29 6% 41 8% 36 7% 15 3% 15 3% Neither good quality nor poor quality Mean 0.87 0.63 0.69 0.49 0.22 Standard deviation Standard error 0.81 0.04 0.93 0.04 0.89 0.04 1.09 0.05 1.14 0.05 Prepared by Populus
  • 9. Page 9 International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013 Absolutes/col percents Table 9 Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in Portugal is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE Base: All Portugal respondents RTP1 Channel TVI SIC Unweighted base 508 508 508 Weighted base 508 508 508 NET: Good quality 265 52% 190 37% 253 50% Very good quality (+2) 35 7% 49 10% 46 9% Fairly good quality (+1) 230 45% 141 28% 206 41% (0) 151 30% 125 25% 150 29% Fairly poor quality (-1) 68 13% 105 21% 79 16% Very poor quality (-2) 15 3% 82 16% 22 4% 83 16% 187 37% 101 20% 8 2% 6 1% 5 1% Neither good quality nor poor quality NET: Poor quality Don't know Mean 0.41 -0.06 0.35 Standard deviation Standard error 0.91 0.04 1.24 0.06 0.99 0.04 Prepared by Populus
  • 10. Page 10 International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013 Absolutes/col percents Table 10 Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in Sweden is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE Base: All Sweden respondents Channel TV3 SVT1 SVT2 Unweighted base 505 505 505 TV4 505 Kanal 5 505 Weighted base 505 505 505 505 505 NET: Good quality 300 59% 272 54% 134 27% 243 48% 163 32% Very good quality (+2) 101 20% 87 17% 37 7% 56 11% 48 10% Fairly good quality (+1) 199 39% 185 37% 98 19% 187 37% 114 23% (0) 98 19% 110 22% 155 31% 134 27% 158 31% Fairly poor quality (-1) 50 10% 53 10% 102 20% 81 16% 81 16% Very poor quality (-2) 33 7% 42 8% 65 13% 28 6% 46 9% NET: Poor quality 84 17% 95 19% 166 33% 109 22% 127 25% Don't know 23 5% 28 6% 50 10% 18 4% 58 11% Neither good quality nor poor quality Mean 0.59 0.47 -0.13 0.33 0.09 Standard deviation Standard error 1.14 0.05 1.17 0.05 1.15 0.05 1.06 0.05 1.13 0.05 Prepared by Populus
  • 11. Page 11 International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013 Absolutes/col percents Table 11 Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in United States is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE Base: All United States respondents Channel PBS ABC NBC CBS Unweighted base 506 506 506 506 Weighted base 506 506 506 506 NET: Good quality 328 65% 320 63% 313 62% 333 66% Very good quality (+2) 152 30% 107 21% 107 21% 137 27% Fairly good quality (+1) 176 35% 213 42% 206 41% 196 39% (0) 80 16% 100 20% 97 19% 91 18% Fairly poor quality (-1) 24 5% 49 10% 46 9% 41 8% Very poor quality (-2) 16 3% 20 4% 29 6% 19 4% NET: Poor quality 39 8% 69 14% 74 15% 60 12% Don't know 59 12% 16 3% 22 4% 21 4% Neither good quality nor poor quality Mean 0.95 0.69 0.65 0.81 Standard deviation Standard error 1.02 0.05 1.05 0.05 1.10 0.05 1.06 0.05 Prepared by Populus
  • 12. Page 12 International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013 Absolutes/col percents Table 12 Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in Brazil is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE Base: All Brazil respondents Channel TV Cultura Unweighted base 507 TV Brasil 507 Globo Record 507 507 SBT 507 Bandeirantes (also known as Band) 507 Weighted base 507 507 507 507 507 507 NET: Good quality 383 76% 247 49% 260 51% 222 44% 219 43% 241 48% Very good quality (+2) 170 34% 72 14% 99 19% 78 15% 62 12% 56 11% Fairly good quality (+1) 213 42% 175 35% 162 32% 144 28% 158 31% 185 36% (0) 74 15% 112 22% 98 19% 149 29% 165 33% 175 34% Fairly poor quality (-1) 14 3% 31 6% 80 16% 73 14% 74 15% 54 11% Very poor quality (-2) 7 1% 19 4% 68 13% 59 12% 46 9% 30 6% NET: Poor quality 21 4% 50 10% 148 29% 132 26% 120 24% 84 17% Don't know 29 6% 98 19% 1 * 4 1% 3 1% 7 1% Neither good quality nor poor quality Mean 1.10 0.61 0.28 0.22 0.23 0.37 Standard deviation Standard error 0.87 0.04 1.01 0.05 1.31 0.06 1.22 0.05 1.12 0.05 1.02 0.05 Prepared by Populus
  • 13. Page 13 International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013 Absolutes/col percents Table 13 Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in Australia is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE Base: All Australia respondents ABC 1 Channel Channel 7 Channel 9 Channel Ten Unweighted base 502 502 502 502 Weighted base 502 502 502 502 NET: Good quality 346 69% 283 56% 268 53% 240 48% Very good quality (+2) 149 30% 74 15% 75 15% 58 12% Fairly good quality (+1) 198 39% 209 42% 193 39% 182 36% (0) 95 19% 124 25% 118 23% 146 29% Fairly poor quality (-1) 21 4% 58 12% 76 15% 75 15% Very poor quality (-2) 7 1% 25 5% 28 6% 25 5% NET: Poor quality 28 6% 83 17% 104 21% 100 20% Don't know 33 7% 12 2% 12 2% 15 3% Neither good quality nor poor quality Mean 0.98 0.51 0.43 0.36 Standard deviation Standard error 0.92 0.04 1.05 0.05 1.10 0.05 1.04 0.05 Prepared by Populus
  • 14. Page 14 International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013 Absolutes/col percents Table 14 Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in Japan is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE Base: All Japan respondents Channel NHK1 Fuji TV NTV Unweighted base 500 500 500 TBS 500 tv asahi 500 TV Tokyo 500 Weighted base 500 500 500 500 500 500 NET: Good quality 255 51% 79 16% 99 20% 114 23% 121 24% 117 23% Very good quality (+2) 50 10% 9 2% 10 2% 9 2% 10 2% 13 3% Fairly good quality (+1) 205 41% 70 14% 89 18% 105 21% 111 22% 104 21% (0) 177 35% 212 42% 259 52% 246 49% 252 50% 218 44% Fairly poor quality (-1) 32 6% 114 23% 95 19% 85 17% 75 15% 62 12% Very poor quality (-2) 16 3% 74 15% 28 6% 33 7% 28 6% 14 3% NET: Poor quality 48 10% 188 38% 123 25% 118 24% 103 21% 76 15% Don't know 20 4% 21 4% 19 4% 22 4% 24 5% 89 18% Neither good quality nor poor quality Mean 0.50 -0.36 -0.09 -0.06 * 0.10 Standard deviation Standard error 0.89 0.04 0.97 0.04 0.83 0.04 0.86 0.04 0.84 0.04 0.81 0.04 Prepared by Populus
  • 15. Page 15 International Perceptions of TV Quality Survey ONLINE Fieldwork : September - October 2013 Absolutes/col percents Table 15 Q.Y To what extent do you think the quality of programmes on the following television channels in UAE is good or poor? SUMMARY TABLE Base: All UAE respondents Dubai TV MBC 2 Channel Al Jazeera MBC 1 Al Arabiya Unweighted base 500 500 500 500 500 Weighted base 500 500 500 500 500 NET: Good quality 337 67% 347 69% 282 56% 289 58% 209 42% Very good quality (+2) 142 28% 140 28% 131 26% 92 18% 56 11% Fairly good quality (+1) 195 39% 207 41% 151 30% 197 39% 153 31% (0) 72 14% 67 13% 77 15% 78 16% 93 19% Fairly poor quality (-1) 11 2% 14 3% 16 3% 26 5% 33 7% Very poor quality (-2) 4 1% 5 1% 25 5% 7 1% 16 3% NET: Poor quality 15 3% 18 4% 41 8% 33 7% 48 10% Don't know 76 15% 67 13% 100 20% 100 20% 149 30% Neither good quality nor poor quality Mean 1.08 1.07 0.86 0.85 0.57 Standard deviation Standard error 0.83 0.04 0.84 0.04 1.11 0.06 0.91 0.05 1.01 0.06 Prepared by Populus