Army Evaluations_Redacted

NCO EVALUATION REPORT IFOR OFFICIAL USE ONL y (FOUO)
+ SEE PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
+For use of this form, see AR 623-3; the proponent agency is DCS, G-1. IN AR623-3.
PART I -ADMINISTRATIVE DATA
a. NAME (Last, First. Middle Initial) Ib. SSN c. RANK d. DATE OF RANK Ie. PMOSC
TATE, GABRlEL P. SSG ( ) 20090211 35F30
f.1. UNIT ORG. STATION ZIP CODE OR APO, MAJOR COMMAND f.2. STATUS CODE g. REASON FOR SUBMISSION
MI Det 41 Sth Military Intelligence Battalion, Carville, LA 70721 139th RSG 02 !Annual
h. PERIOD COVERED i. RATED j. NON- k.NO.OF I. RATED NCO'S EMAIL ADDRESS m. UIC n. CMD o. PSB
FROM THRU
MONTHS RATED ENCL (gov or .mil} CODE CODE
CODES
YEAR MONTH DAY YEAR MONTH DAY
20100427 20101031 6 gabricl.tatc@us.army.mil WYT3BO NG 22
PART II - AUTHENTICATION
a. NAME OF RATER (Last. First, Midd/elnit1al)
ISSN ISIGNATURE IDATE (YYYYMMDD)
MAYERS, JOSHUA I. MAYBRS.IOSHIJANBS.lll89IH$ 20101201
RANK PMOSCIBRANCH ORGANIZATION DUTY ASSIGNMENT IRATER'S AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (gov. or .mil)
SFC 35L4L MI Det, 41 Sth Military Intelligence SR CI AGENT josh.mayers(li)us.army.mil
b. NAME OF SENIOR RATER (Last. First, Middle Initial)
ISSN
ALLEN, BRYANT.
ISIGNATURE IDATE (YYYYMMDD)
ALI..m(.BRYA11f.'IllOMAS.m6127$ 20I01201
RANK PMOSC/BRANCH ORGANIZATION DUTY ASSIGNMENT ISENIOR RATER s AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov or mil)
SFC 35F MI Det, 41 Sth Military Intelligence DETSGT bryan.allen@us.army.mil
c. NAME OF REVIEWER (Last. First. Middle Initial )
ISSN ISIGNATURE IDATE (YYYYMMDD)
PIPER, THELMA R. l'll'Jll.:rnm.MAKOCm!LLB.12444270. 20Io1201
RANK PMOSC/BRANCH ORGANIZATION DUTY ASSIGNMENT IREVIEWER'S AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (gov. or mil}
CPT 35D/MI MI Det, 41 Sth Military Intelligence CDR thelma.piper@us.army.mil
d. ~CONCUR WITH RATER AND SENIOR RATER EVALUATIONS [ ] NONCONCUR WITH RATER AND/OR SENIOR RATER EVAL (See attached comments)
e. RATED NCO: I understand my signature does not constitute agreement or disagreement with the evaluations of SIGNATURE DATE (YYYYMMOD)
~~cj:f;~;i~~1r
1
~;~~ty ~~~~~~~'fg~~~~emth;
1
&,~~~~i~~~:~!h1~t~~111,~i~~stJ:~~taa~
0
ct~~19
1
hil:eF~r9
TATE.GABRIEL.PAUL.112033850entries in Part !Ve are correct I have seen the completed report I am aware of the appeals process of AR 62~3. 20101201
PART Ill - DUTY DESCRIPTION (Rater)
a. PRINCIPAL DUTY TITLE Ib. DUTY MOSC
Intelligenee Analyst 35F30
c. DAILY DUTIES AND SCOPE (To include, as appropriate, people, eqwpment. facilities and dollars)
Assists in preparing intelligence produets to support the commander; provide support in establishing and maintaining systematic,
cross-referenced intelligence records and files; provide support in determining significance and reliability of incoming information;
supports the integration of incoming information with current intelligence holdings and prepares and maintains the situation map;
supports analysis evaluation ofintelligence holdings to determine changes in enemy capabilities, vulnerabilities, and probable courses of
action; assists in assembling and proofreading intelligence reports and consolidating them into military intelligence.
d. AREAS OF SPECIAL EMPHASIS
Safety, training, and readiness
e. APPOINTED DUTIES
f. COUNSELING DATES INITIAL ILATER ILATER LATER
20100727
PART IV· ARMY VALUES/ATTRIBUTES/SKILLS/ACTIONS (Rater)
a. ARMY VALUES. Check either "YES" or "NO" (Bullet Comments are mandatory Substantive buffet comments are required for 'NO' entries)
=mLOYALTY: Bears !rue faith and allegiance to the S. Constitution, the Army, !he unit, and other Soldiers.
v
Loyalty DUTY: Fulfills their obligations.
Duty '
Respect
RESPECT!EOIEEO: Treats people as they should be treated.
mA Selfless-Service 4. SELFLESS-SERVICE: Puts the vvelfare of !he nation, the Army, and subordinates before their own.
5. HONOR: Lives up to all the Army values.
L 6. INTEGRITY: Does what is right - legally and morally.
7. PERSONAL COURAGE: Faces fear, danger, or adversity (physical and moral) IX
u ou11et commem:s
o professional and competent NCO
Honor
E o motivates and challenges subordinates through leadershipIntegrity
Personal Courage
s 0 Soldiers witha and " v their his
DA FORM 2166-8, MAR 2006 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE.

COMPETENCE
and
abilities
0
o alvvays
o Ac(:orr1prnshlr1g tasks to the fullest capacity;
ccrnmirted to excellence
EXCELLENCE
(Exceeds std)
Ji
SUCCESS
(Meets std}
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
c. PHYSICAL FITNESS & MILITARY BEARING
o Mental and physical toughness
o Endurance and stamina lo go the distance
o Displaying confidence and enthusiasm;
looks like a soldier
d. LEADERSHIP
o Mission first
SUCCESS
(Meets std}
o Genuine concern for Soldiers
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
(Some} (Much)
o Instilling the spirit to achieve and win
o Setting the example; Be, Know, Do
the
exploitation
o aided National Guard Intelligence Center Document and Media Exploitation
instructors in IT issues the Comand Post Exercise
APFT PASS 721 198 YES
o took initiative to maintain a high state readiness at all times
demanded and enforced standards Soldiers' appearance
o took charge ofthe detatehment in absence
18 Soldiers
command; supervised training for
o developed strategies to advance detachment mission readieness
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT o took challenges head on; always looked for opportunities to improve as a leader
(Exceeds std) (Meets std) (Some) (Much)
I
e. TRAINING
o Individual and team
o Mission focused; performance oriented
o Teaching Soldiers how; common tasks,
duly-related skills
o Sharing knowledge and experience to fight,
survive and win
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
o successfuly and safely zeroed 26 Battalion personnel as the zero range safety
NCOIC with no accidents or injuries while in a high risk inviroment
o used two months personal time in order attend training to ensure that the unit
acomplished necessary goals to support OEF mobilization
(Exceeds std) (Meets std) (Some) (Much) o obtained CompTia Network+ industry training and certification during his down
time
f. RESPONSIBILITY & ACCOUNTABILITY o delegated responsibility effectively
o Care and maintenance of equipment/facilities
o Soldier and equipment safely
o Conservation of supplies and funds
o maintained 100% accountability for personal and equipment
o Encouraging Soldiers to learn and grow
o Responsible for good, bad, right & wrong o accepted responsibity for own mistakes; encouraged integrity in subordinates
a. RATER. Overall potential for promotion andlor
service in positions of greater responsibility.
AMONG THE
BEST
FULLY
CAPABLE MARGINAL
b. RATER List 3 positions in which the rated
NCO could best serve the Army at his/her
current or next higher grade.
Platoon Sergeant
Senior Analyst
OCS Candidate
c. SENIOR RATER. Overall performance
+
PART V - OVERALL PERFORMANCE AND POTENTIAL
e. SENIOR RATER BULLET COMMENTS
o professional NCO, promote with peers
o performs well as leader, handles pressure and high stress issues with extreme
professionalism
o well rounded NCO with potential to accept a position ofincreased responsibly
o constintly seeks additional training to maintain a high state of Soldier readiness
2 3
Successful Fair
5
Poor
d. SENIOR RATER. Overall potential
for promotion and/or service in
positions of greater responsibility. 2
Superior Fair Poor
DA FORM 2166-8, MAR 2006 Page 2 of 2
APD PE v501ES

NCO EVALUATION REPORT
For use of this form, see AR 623-3; the proponent agency is DCS, G-1.
a. NAME (Last. First. Middle lnma/J
TATE, GABRIEL P.
!c. RANK
SSG
f.1. UNIT ORG. STATION ZIPCODEORAPO, MAJORCCM.i!AND f.2 STATUS CODE
MOBMIDET 41 Sth l1I BN, Bagram, Afghanistan, APO AE 09354 CENTCOM
h. PERIOD COVERED
FROM THRU
20101!01 i 20111110 13
I. RATED NCO'S EMAIL ADDRESS
(gov or .mil)
gabricl.p.tate@us.arrny.mil
PART II • AUTHENTICATION
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (FOUO)
SEE PRIVACY ACT STATEMENT
IN AR 623-3
d. DATE OF RANK ! e. PMOSC
) 20090211 35F
WYT3130 NG
a. NAME OF RATER (Last, First. Middle lmf1al) 1 SIGNATURE DATE (YYYYMMDD)
I1A'Nlt5mSAWJEL.MAH.m9mO 111021BANK.ESTER, SAMUEL M.
22
RANK
SFC
PMOSCIBRANCH
35F4L
ORGANIZATION
HIID 41 STH Ml BN
DUTY ASSIGNMENT RATER'S AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (gov or mtl)
TIG J3 NCOfC sam.bankester(W,us.army.mil
b. NAME OF SENIOR RATER (Last First Middle Initial)
POUNDERS, ANTHONY L
SSN I SIGNATURE DATE (YYYYMMDD)
I 10aau.~l.Oll>.M.111t1miO 20111021
RANK PMOSCIBRANCH ORGANIZATION DUTY ASSIGNMENT SENIOR RATERS AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (gov or m1/)
MAJ MI HHD 41 STH MI BN TIG J3 OIC anthony.1.pounders(~(us.army.mil
·.; NAME oFREVrEWER-[iasr F1rsi. Miciiieln1liaii________'SSN_______~oi.iATuRE ---- ---·--------- DATE-!Y-YYYMi..ioo)______
WI IIPPLE. GARY J II ; 1 WHIPPIEJlARYJOSEPfUI.11113110 20111030
RANK
MAJ
PMOSCIBRANCH
AD
ORGANIZATIO
HHD 41 STH MI BN
DUTY ASSIGNMENT
BNXO
REVIEWER'S AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (gov. or m11)
gary.whipple@usarmy.mil
d. ~ CONCUR WITH RATER AND SENIOR RATER EVALUATIONS NONCONCUR WITH RATER AND/OR SENIOR RATER EVAL (See attached comments)
"- RATED NCO! I understand my signature does not constitute agreement or disagreement with the evaluations or SIGNATURE ! DATE (YYYYMMDD)
the rater and senior rater I further understand my signature venftes that the administrative data In Part f, the ratitig Iofftclafs m Part ll, the duty description to include the counseling dates ln Part !ll, and the APFT and he ht/-Ne ht
entries in Part IVc are correct. I have seen the completed report. I am aware of the appeals process of9AR 62£3 TATE.GABRIEL.PAUL.11203385$ ,20 J J1106
PART Ill • DUTY DESCRIPTION (Rater)
--------------·----------------------,-----"'· PRINCIPAL DUTY TITLE b. DUTY MOSC
Intelligence Analyst 35F30
c. DAILY DUTIES AND SCOPE (To include. as appropnate_ people. eqwpment. facilities and dollars)
Jssisls in preparing intelligence products to support the commander; provide support in establishing aIJd maintaining systematic, cross
-referenced intelligence records and files; provide suppott in determining significance and reliability of incoming information: supports
the integration of incoming information with current intelligence holdings; supports analysis evaluation ofintelligcnee holdings to
determine ehanges in enemy capabilities, vulnerabilities, and probable eourses of action; assists m assembling and proofreading raw data
and consolidating it into military intelligence products.
d_ AREAS OF SPECIAL EMPHASIS
Knowledge Management; Safety.
e. APPOINTED DUTIES
Theater fntelligence
COUNSELING DATES
v
A
Honor
Integrity
L
DA FORM 2166-8,
([JG) infr)rmation and database system mamtenance; lnter-Departmental Data Management Coordinator.
u
E
s

RATED NCO'S N.AME (Last, Ftrst. Middle lnit1at)
TATE. GABRIEL P
PART IV (Rater) ·VALUES/NCO RESPONSIBILITIES
b. COMPETENCE
o Duty proficiency; MOS competency
o Technical & tactical; knowlooge, skills, and
abilities
o Sound judgment
o Seeking self-Improvement; always learning
o Accomplishing tasks to the fullest capacity;
committed lo excellence
SSN
&/fief comments are mtJndlftory,
THRU DATE
20111110
b.stsnttve bullet comments are r uired for "EXCELLENCE' or 'NEEDS !MPROVeMENT, •
.o increased the DOMEX Section's exploited media production hy 108% within the
Ifirst month of assuming duties
o chosen over five other Knowledge Management personnel to produce the TIG
Information Mimagement Sy3tem plan and present to TIG Commander
EXCELLENCE
(Exceegs strJ)
success
(M~f§, std)
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT o din:utly uontributed lo the improvement of overall quality of TIG DOMEX
(Some) (Much)
! ! !l r-·1 intelligence production by streamlining all reporting channels
o Endurance and stamina to go the distance
looks like a Soldier
APFT PASS 20110415 HEIGHT/WEIGHT 721 194 YES
o consistently auhieved the Army standard on the APFT during the rated period
o always wore his unifonn properly and maintained a professional demeanor
EXCELLENCE success NEEDS IMPROVEMENT o when faced with daunting, time-consuming data management tasks, always attacked
(Exceeds std) (Meets std) /Some) (Much) those tasks with enthusiasm and perseverant:e
I I
d. LEADERSHIP
o Mission first
EXCELLENCE
(Exceeds std)
D ..a. TRAINING
SUCCESS
(Meets std)
~
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
(Some) (Much)
n
duty-related skills
survive and win
EXCELLENCE
(Exceeds std)
success
(Meets std)
-1
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
(Some) (Much}
I
o used personal time to mentor two junior Knowledge Management personnel and
provided them with necessary tools to maintain TIG databases
o expertly managed the work imd production of 8 personnel. which resulted in
increased overall efficiency in the DOMEX
o provided positive input and feedback to 13 staff when data management challenges
seemed insunnmmtable
o trained 8 personnel in operating the Dcployahlc Harmony DOCEX Suite and rt.-dueed
spccilfo media exploitation time from 5 days to 12 hours
o volunteered lo provide additional Distributed Common Ground System - Army
(DCGS-A) training to 30 TIG personnel
o shared extensive experience in Knowledge Management with 27 J3 Section staff
memhers, increasing the efficiency of TIO statistical intelligence reporting
i--~--~~~~~~~~~~~------~~~-----4
f. RESPONSIBILITY & ACCOUNTABILITY
o Care and maintenance of equipmenl/facili!ies
o Soldier and equipment safely
o Responsible for good, bad. right & wrong
o consolidated over 12 TIG databases into one tracking system and saved 160 man
hours of database maintenanue per week
o worked beyond nonnal duty hours for a 3 month period in order to complete the
reconfiguration ofT!G databases which track the records ofover 2500 detainees
(Exceeds std) (Meets std) fS/}...f!I.'!) rr~h) o entrusted with the maintenance of DoD computer svstems valued at over $50,000,
, I with zero incidents of uquipmcnt failure or replacement
promotion and/or
PART V ·OVERALL PERFORMANCE AND POTENTIAL~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-.
e. SENIOR RATER BULLET COMl.1ENTS
DA FORM 2166-8,

NCO EVALUATION REPORT IFOR OFFICIAL USE ONL y f:OUO)
SEE PRIVACYACTSTATE ENT
For use otthis form, see AR 623-3; the proponent agency Is DCS, G-1. INAR623·3.
PARTI - ADMINISTRATIVE DATA
e. NAME (Last, First, Middle lnilial) lb. SSN c. RANK d. DATE OF RANK Ie. PMOSC
TATE, GABRIEL P. SSG ( > 20040424 35F30
Analysis Detachment, 4 I5th MI 13N (L), Carville, LA 70721, l39th RSG M-DAY 02 IAnnual
h. PERIOD COVERED I. RATED j. NON- k. NO. OF I. RATED NCO'S EMAIL ADDRESS m. UIC n. CMD o. PSB
FROM THRU
MONTHS RATED ENCL (.gov or .mil) CODE CODE
CODES
20111111 20121110 12 gabricl.tate@us.army.miI WYTJBO NG 22
PART II· AUTHENTICATION
a. NAME OF RATER (Last, First. Middle /nit/a/) ISSN I ~NATU.Bf._ -- - -1DATE (YYYYMMDD)
MULLEN DARREN R. MtJU.BNDARIU!N.lONALD.11202JI.0 20130407
RANK PMOSC/BRANCH ORGANIZATION DUTY ASSIGNMENT lRATER'S AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov. or.mil)
SFC 35M40 Analysis Detachment, 415th Ml BN Sr Humint Coli SGT darren.nmllen@us.army.mil
b. NAME OF SENIOR RATER (Last, First. Middle /nil/al) ISSN I =~TUBL.. - - - - -1DATE (YYYYMMDD)
BANKESTER SAMUEL BM4JJ!3IER.SAMUBl.MAll.lll9!nl0 20130407
RANK PMOSC/BRANCH ORGANIZATION DUTY ASSIGNMENT ISENIOR RATER s AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov. or.mil)
SFC 35M4L Analysis Detachment, 4l5th MI BN Readiness NCO sam.bankester@us.army.mil
c. NAME OF REVIEWER (Last, First, Middle Initial}
.....I~IGNATURE__ ·-- - - IDATE (YYYYMMDD)
PELTIER DARRYL W. 1,PELTIBR.DARRYLWAY$.1261151it 20130407
RANK PMOSC/BRANCH ORGANIZATION DUTY ASSIGNMENT IREVIEWER'S AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov. or .mil)
lLT Ml Analysis Detachment, 4l5th MI BN XO darryl.w.pelticr@us.army.mil
d. ~CONCUR WITH RATER AND SENIOR RATER EVALUATIONS [ ] NONCONCUR WITH RATER ANDIOR SENIOR RATER EVAL (See attached comments)
e. RATED NCO: I understand my signature does not constitute agreement or dlsaQreement with the evaluations of SIGNATURE DATE (YYYYMMDD)
the rater and senlQr rater. I further understand my signature verifies that the administrative data In Part I, the rali~
officials In Part~, the duty desyrtptlon to Include lhe counselin~ dates in Parl 11~and the fs,FT and hej!Wl/vel~h
ITATE.-GABRIBL.PAUL.11203385~ 20130407entries In Part I care correct. have seen the compleled repo< . I am aware of e appea s process of 623- .
PART Ill ·DUTY DESCRIPTION (Rater)
a. PRINCIPAL DUTY TITLE Ib. DUTY MOSC
INTELLIGENCE ANALYST 35F30
c. DAILY DUTIES AND SCOPE (To Include, as appropriate, people, equipment, facilities and dollars)
Prepares all-source intelligence products to support the commander; assists in establishing and maintaining systematic, cross-referenced
intelligence records and files; assists in determining significance and reliability ofincoming information; integrates incoming
information with cnrrent intelligence holdings and prepares and maintains the situation map; analysis and evaluation of intelligence
holdings to determine changes in enemy capabilities, vulnerabilities, and probable courses of action; assembles and proofreads
intelligence reports and consolidates them into military intelligence; prepares intelligence preparation of the battlefield {IPB) products.
PODIS Sharepoint Application Administrator.
e. APPOINTED DUTIES
Section Sergeant.
I. COUNSELING DATES IINITIAL ILATER ILATER LATER
20120121 20120811
PART IV· ARMY VALUES/ATTRIBUTES/SKILLS/ACTIONS (Rater)
a. ARMY VALUES. Check either "YES" or "NO". (Bullet Comments are mandatory. Substantive bullet comments are required for "NO" entries.) YES NO
1. LOYALTY: Bears true faith and allegiance to the U.S. Constitution, the Army, the unit, and other Soldiers. IX
v
Loyalty 2. DUTY: Fulfills !heir obligations. ><
Duty
3. RESPECT/EC/EEO: Treats people as they should be treated. )(
Respect
A Selfless-Service 4. SELFLESS-SERVICE: Puts the welfare of the nation, the Army, and subordinates before their own. ><
5. HONOR: Lives up to all the Army values. )<
L 6. INTEGRITY: Does what is right· legally and morally. )<
7. PERSONAL COURAGE: Faces fear, danger, or adversity (physical and moral). ~
u Bullet comments
o displays loyalty to country through duty and dedication
Honor
Integrity
E o always gives 100% to accomplish mission
Personal Courage
s o respected for his candor and integrity
DA FORM 2166-8, OCT 2011 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. Page 1of2
APO PE v1.02ES

RATED NCO'S NAME (Last First. Middle Initial)
TATE, GABRIEL P.
PART IV (Rater ·VALUES/NCO RESPONSIBILITIES
b. COMPETENCE
o Technical & tactical; knowledge, skills, and
abllllles
THRU DATE
20121110
o assisted on the upgrading of the Louisiana Point of Distribution System fro1i1 a
SharePoint 2003 Version to 2010 Version
o Sound judgment
o Seeking self-Improvement; always learning
o Accomplishing tasks to the fullest capacity:
committed lo excellence
o displayed superior attention to detail and played a vital role in mission success of
PODIS mission during Hurricane Issac
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS
(Exceeds std) (Meets std)
I
NE~g~~~PR~Z~~fNT o competency led to being chosen by LTC Barth, Datacenter Manager USPFO for
LA/J8, to be placed on the DTC JMD during emergencies
APFT HEIGHT/WEIGHT 721 220 YES
o always displayed a impeccable military appearance and bearing
o mentally and physically tough NCO; easily managed multiple missions and tasks
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 0 no APFT administered during rating period
(E'l<.ceeds std) (Meets std) (Some) (Much)
d. LEADERSHIP
o Mission first
o performed as Night Shift POD Operation NCOIC during Hurricane Issac
o Setting tha example; Be, Know, Do
o consistently volunteered to the I39th Data Processing Center for PODIS systems
improvements
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 0 served as Section Sergeant in charge oftwo squads
e. TRAINING o ensured the training and documentation of required state training and analyst training
duty.related skills
survive and Win
o helped reorganize MlDETs Squads for the training of two cadets to act as platoon
leaders
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT 0 maintained a training plan for his section
(Excee,ds std) (Meets std) (Some) (M_uch)
a Care and maintenance of equlpmenVlacilitles
o performed research on his own time to provide implemented improvements on the
PODIS System
o Soldier and equipment safety
o Encouraging Soldiers to learn and grow o maintained 100% accountability ofall assigned equipment
o Responsible for good, bad, right & wrong
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT o assisted in saving the LANG countless dollars in the implementation ofthe new
(Exceeds std) (Meets std) (Some) (Much) PODIS
I I
a. RATER. Overall potential for promotion and/or
service In positions of greater responslblllty.
AMONG THE
BEST
FULLY
CAPABLE MARGINAL
PART V ·OVERALL PERFORMANCE AND POTENTIAL
o prior Navy NCO experience immensely valuable, send NCO to WLC and ALC as
soon as possible
o promote to Sergeant First Class as sopn as possible
:!fl]
1-b-.-RA...L-T-"E'-R-.-Li-st-
3
-po-si-Uo_n_jsl....in-,..L"'h-lc_h_t-he-ra-te_d_-...____--10 possesses potential to perform at increased levels ofresponsibility with little
NCO could best serve the Army at his/her supervision; continue to challenge to potential
Platoon Sergeant
Master Analyst
Warrant Officer
o a rare mix of intelligence and initiative; constantly performed above standard
technology and mission support during hurricane operations
2 3
Successful
4
Fair
s
Poor
for promotion and/or service In
positions of greater responsibility. 2 3
Superior
4
Fair
5
Poor
DA FORM 2168·8, OCT 2011 Page 2 of 2
APO PE v1.02ES

NCO EVALUATION REPORT IFOR OFFICIAL USE ONL y f:OUO)
SEE PRIVACYACT STATE ENT
For use of this form, see AR 623-3; the proponent agency is DCS, G-1. JNAR 623-3.
PART I - ADMINISTRATIVE DATA
a. NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial} I b. SSN c. RANK d. DATE OF RANK I e. PMOSC
TATE, GABRIELP. SSG ( ) 20090211 35F30
Analysis Detachment, 415th MI BN (L), Carville, LA 70721, 139th RSG M-DAY 02 IAnnual
h. PERIOD COVERED i. RATED j. NON- k. NO. OF I. RATED NCO'S EMAIL ADDRESS m. UIC n. CMD o. PSB
FROM THRU
MONTHS RATED ENCL (.gov or .mil} CODE CODE
CODES
YEAR MONTH DAY YEAR MONTH DAY gabriel.tate@us.army.mil
20121111 20131110 12 WYT3BO NG LA22
PART II -AUTHENTICATION
a. NAME OF RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial)
ISSN I SIGNATURE I DATE (YYYYMMDD)
MULLEN DARREN R. IMlJLLJilll.DARllEl'!.ROJl{ALD,1120251. 20131208
RANK PMOSC/BRANCH ORGANIZATION DUTY ASSIGNMENT IRATER'S AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov. or .mil}
SFC 35M40 Analysis Detachment, 415th MI BN Sr Humint Coll SGT darren.r.mullen.mil@mail.mil
b. NAME OF SENIOR RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial) ISSN I t'G~AIUBE I DATE (YYYYMMDD)
HEBERT, DARRYL IHF.BER.T.DARR.YL.JAMEB.11202141!# 20131208
RANK PMOSC/BRANCH ORGANIZATION DUTY ASSIGNMENT ISENIOR RATER s AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov. or .mil)
MSG 35M4L Analysis Detachment, 415thMIBN Detachment SGT darryl.j.hebert.mil@mail.mil
c. NAME OF REVIEWER (Last, First, Middle Initial) ISSN I ~1r,NlTI IDC I DATE (YYYYMMDD)
PELTIER DARRYL W. IPELTIBll,DARR.YL,WAYml,ll611S8'; 20131208
RANK PMOSC/BRANCH ORGANIZATION DUTY ASSIGNMENT IREVIEWER'S AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov. or .mil)
CPT MI Analysis Detachment, 415th MI BN XO darryl.w.peltier@us.army.mil
d. ~ CONCUR WITH RATER AND SENIOR RATER EVALUATIONS D NONCONCUR WITH RATER AND/OR SENIOR RATER EVAL (See attached comments)
e. RATED NCO: I understand my signature does not constitute agreement or disagreement with the evaluations of SIGNATURE DATE (YYYYMMDD)
the rater and senior rater. I further understand my signature verifies that the administrative data In Part I, the ratin~
officials in Part II, the duty description to include the counseiin~ dates in Part illhand the APFT and hei~t/wei~h
ITATE.GABRIEL.PAUL.112D33851) 20131208entries in Part IVc are correct. I have seen the completed repor . I am aware oft e appeals process of A 623- .
PART 111- DUTY DESCRIPTION (Rater)
a. PRINCIPAL DUTY TITLE I b. DUTY MOSC
INTELLIGENCE ANALYST 35F30
c. DAILY DUTIES AND SCOPE (To include, as appropriate, people, equipment, facilities and dollars)
intelligence records and files; assists in determining significance and reliability of incoming information; integrates incoming
infonnation with current intelligence holdings and prepares and maintains the situation map; analysis and evaluation of intelligence
holdings to determine changes in enemy capabilities, vulnerabilities, and probable courses of action; assembles and proofreads
intelligence reports and consolidates them into military intelligence; prepares intelligence preparation of the battlefield (IPB) products.
PODIS Sharepoint Application Administrator
e. APPOINTED DUTIES
Section SGT
f. COUNSELING DATES INITIAL I LATER I LATER LATER
20121204 20130407
PART IV - ARMY VALUES/ATTRIBUTES/SKILLS/ACTIONS (Rater)
a. ARMY VALUES. Check either "YES" or "NO". (Bullet Comments are mandatory. Substantive bullet comments are required for "NO" entries.)
1. LOYALTY: Bears true faith and allegiance to the U. S. Constitution, the Army, the unit, and other Soldiers.
v
Loyalty 2. DUTY: Fulfills their obligations.
Duty
3. RESPECT/EO/EEO: Treats people as they should be treated.
Respect
A Selfless-Service 4. SELFLESS-SERVICE: Puts the welfare of the nation, the Army, and subordinates before their own.
5. HONOR: Lives up to all the Army values.
L 6. INTEGRITY: Does what is right - legally and morally.
7. PERSONAL COURAGE: Faces fear, danger, or adversity (physical and moral).
u Bullet comments
o displays loyalty to country through duty and dedication
Honor E o always gives 100% to accomplish missionIntegrity
Personal Courage
s o respected for his candor and integrity
-DA FORM 2166-8, OCT 2011 PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE.
YES NO
x
><
x
x
x
x
1X
Page 1 of 2
APO PE v1 .02ES

RATED NCO'S NAME (Last, First, Middle Initial)
TATE, GABRIEL P.
PART IV (Rater) - VALUES/NCO RESPONSIBILITIES
b. COMPETENCE
abilities
o Sound judgment
o Seeking self-improvement; always learning
committed to excellence
Bullet comments are mandatory.
THRU DATE
20131110
Substantive bullet comments are re uired for "EXCELLENCE" or "NEEDS IMPROVEMENT."
o displayed superior attention to detail and played a vital role in success of PODIS
mission during Hurricane DRX resulting in 100% accuracy
o possessed an attitude to continue self-improvement by volunteering to attend
training in configuring and administering Windows 8 and Windows Server 2012
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT o consulted in the upgrading of the Louisiana Point of Distribution System from a
(Exceeds std) (Meets std) (Some) (Much) SharePoint 2003 Version to 2010 Version
APFT PROFILE HEIGHT/WEIGHT
o displayed an impeccable military appearance and bearing
o mentally tough; easily managed multiple missions and tasks
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT o physically tough NCO; always volunteered to do heavy lifting
73 / 225 YES
d. LEADERSHIP
o Mission first
o displayed an attitude that fosters concern and respect for all soldiers ensuring that no
one is mistreated physically or mentally
o consistently volunteered to assist thel39th Data Processing Center for PODIS
systems improvements
(Exceeds std) (Meets std} (Some) (Much) o served as Section Sergeant in charge of two squads
e. TRAINING o conducted and supervised execution and documentation of required annual training
duty-related skills
survive and win
o mentored and trained his section on DOMEX operations in a deployment
environment
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT o attended Microsoft training in his civilian job and shared this knowledge with his
(Exceeds std) (Meets std} (Some) (Much} peers
o Care and maintenance of equipmenUfacilities
o performed research on his own time to provide implemented improvements on the
PODIS System
o Encouraging Soldiers to learn and grow o maintained 100% accountability of all assigned equipment
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDS IMPROVEMENT o assisted in saving the LANG countless dollars in the implementation of the new
(Exceeds std} (Meets std) (Some) (Much} PODIS
AMONG THE
BEST
FULLY
CAPABLE MARGINAL
o prior Navy NCO ~xperience immensely valuable, send NCO to WLC and ALC as
soon as possible
o possesses potential to increased responsibility; promote ahead of peers
~
1--'---'-------><--"-------==""-----~ o a competent and innovative NCO; not afraid of risk in order to improve
b. RATER. List 3 positions in which the rated
NCO could best serve the Army at his/her
Platoon Sergeant
Master Analyst
Warrant Officer
o a rare mix of intelligence and initiative; consistently performs above the standard
~DD DD2 3 4 5
Successful Fair Poor
positions of greater responsibility.
D~D
2 3
Superior
D
4
Fair
D
5
Poor
DA FORM 2166-8, OCT 2011 Page 2 of 2
APD PE v1 .02ES

~,-.L--~-"-V'N·~~,~·VAL~~T~o';-~~p~~;~~---------..1-~-~-{flffiff;xgffffkf{;g;fFZF,.,,
For use of this form, see AR 623-3; the proponent agency is DCS, G-1. JN AR 623-3,
n-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~o~.~.~~--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
a. NAME(Last, First, Middle Initial) I~ c. RANK d. DATE OF RANK Ie. PMOSC
TATE, GABRIEL P. ~ SSG ( J 20040424 35F30
f.1. UNIT ORG. STATION ZIP CODE OR APO, MAJOR COMMAN-D-1-f-.2-.-S-T_A_TU_S_C_O_D_E_ _,_g.-R-E-AS_O_N_F_O_R_S_U~B-M_l_S_S-IO-N------<<
Analysis Detachment, 415th MI BN (I), Carville, LA 70721, 139th RSG M-DAY 02 IAnnual
h. PERIOD COVERED
FROM THRU
YEAR MONTH DAY YEAR. MONTH DAY
20131111 20141110
i. RATED j. NON-
MONTHS RATED
CODES
12
k. NO. OF
ENCL
I. RATED NCO'S EMAIL ADDRESS
(.gov or .mil)
gabriel.p.tate.mil@mail.mil
m. UIC
WYT3BO
n. CMD
CODE
NG
PART II -AUTHENTICATION
a. NAME OF RATER(Last, First, Middle Initial) ISSN
SANCHEZ, CARLOS H. I
SIGNATURE . I DATE (YYYYMMDD)
tl./NCHFZ.CAJlLOll HllMB!lllIO.JUtl~ 20 150208
o. PSB
CODE
LA22
DUTY ASSIGNMENT IRATER'S AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov. or .mil)
Sr Humint Coll SGT carlos.h.sanchez.mil@mail.mil
RANK PMOSC/BRANCH ORGANIZATION
SFC 35M4L Analysis Detachment, 415th MI BN
b. NAME OF SENIOR RATER (Last, First, Middle Initial) I SSN
HEBERT, DARRYL J. I
SIGNATURE I DATE (YYYYMMDD)
HFBEllT.DARR.YL.JAMES.1120214:J°& 20150210
RANK
MSG
PMOSCIBRANCH
35M4L
ORGANIZATION
Analysis Detachment, 4l 5th MI BN
DUTY ASSIGNMENT ISENIOR RATER s AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov. or .mil)
Detachment SGT darryl.j.hebert2.mil@mail.mil
c. NAME OF REVIEWER(Lasl, First, Middle Initial)
PELTIERDARRYL W.
ISSN
I
SIGNATURE I DATE (YYYYMMDD)
PELTIBR.DARRYL,WAY1'1E,12611Sm@ 20150210
11-----------------------~
RANK
CPT
PMOSC/BRANCH
M{
ORGANIZATION
Analysis Detachment, 415th MI BN
DUTY ASSIGNMENT IREVIEWER'S AKO EMAIL ADDRESS (.gov. or .mil)
XO darryl.w.peltier@us.army.mil
d. ~CONCUR WITH RATER AND SENIOR RATER EVALUATIONS D NONCONCUR WITH RATER AND/OR SENIOR RATER EVAL (See attached comments)
e. RATED NCO: I understand my signature does not constitute agreement or disagreement with the evaluations of SIGNATURE DATE (YYYYMMOD)
the rater and senior rater. I further understand my signature verifies that the administrative data in Part I, the rating
offic_ials. in Part 11, the duty description to include the counseling dates in Part 111, and the APFT and height/weighf T.l'TE GABRIEL PAUL 112"''!385'11Q._ 2015022
3entries m Part IVc are correct. l have seen the completed reporl I am aware of the appeals process of AR 623-3. a , , . U.J ~J
a. PRINCIPAL DUTY TITLE
INTELLIGENCE ANALYST NCO
PART Ill - DUTY DESCRIPTION (Rater)
I
b. DUTY MOSC
35F30
c. DAILY DUTIES AND SCOPE (To include, as appropriate, people, equipment, facilities and dollars)
intelligence records and files; assists in determining significance and reliability of incoming infonnation; integrates incoming
infomiation with cuITent intelligence holdings and prepares and maintains the situation map; analysis and evaluation of intelligence
holdings to dete1mine changes in enemy capabilities, vulnerabilities, and probable courses of action; assembles and proofreads
intelligence reports and consolidates them into military intelligence; prepares intelligence preparation of the battlefield (IPB) products.
PODIS Sharepoint Application Administrator
e. APPOINTED DUTIES
Section SGT
f. COUNSELING DATES INITIAL
20140112 I
LATER
20140406 I
LATER
20140712
PART IV - ARMY VALUES/ATIRIBUTES/SKILLS/ACTIONS (Raterj
LATER
a. ARMY VALUES. Check either "YES" or "NO". (Bullet Comments are mandatory. Substantive bullet comments are required for "NO" entries.)
v
A
L
Honor
Integrity
Personal Courage
Loyalty
Duty
Respect
Selfless-Service
u
E
s
DA FORM 2166-8, OCT 2011
1. LOYALTY: Bears true faith and allegiance to the U. S. Constttution, the Army, the unit, and other Soldiers.
2. DUTY: Fulfills their obligations.
3. RESPECT/EO/EEO: Treats people as they should be treated.
4. SELFLESS-SERVICE: Puts the welfare of the nation, the Army, and subordinates before their own.
5. HONOR: Lives up lo all the Army values.
6. INTEGRITY: Does what is right - legally and morally.
7. PERSONAL COURAGE: Faces fear, danger, or adversity (physical and moralj.
Bullet comments
o went the extra mile to suppmi and care for his Soldiers
o displayed an exceptional devotion to duty
o an honorable NCO; demontrated high integrity and personal comage
PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE.
YES NO
><
x
XI
XI
XI
XI
Page 1 of 2
APD PE v1 .02ES

"RllT~~;;t,Mid~-' ---~ ISSN -==··~JT~r:~T,~,,~~~-·1
Bullet comments are mandatory. ---~---·~-_.,, .. ~i
PART IV (Rater) ·VALUES/NCO RESPONSIBILITIES Substantive bullet comments are renuired for 'EXCELLENCE" or "NEEDS IMPROVEMENT."
b. COMPETENCE o provided outstanding technical suppmi through out the rating period for the
0
Duty proficiency; MOS competency Louisiana Point of Distribution System at the request of the J6 director
abilities
o Sound judgment
o Seeking self-improvement; always learning
committed to excellence
o served as a Project Manager in the installation of the Nutanix Platfonn and
maintained the project under the allocated $288,000 budget
EXCELLENCE
(Exe~ std)
SUCCESS
(Meets std)
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT o shared his technical and tactical intelligence operational knowledge to develop the
(Some) (Much)
n n n technical proficiency of five junior intelligence analysts
-
APFT PROFILE 20140228 IHEIGHT/WEIGHT 73 i 225 YES
o no APFT taken this rating period while on profile through 28 February 2014.
o a confident and mentally tough NCO with professional militmy bearing
EXCELLENCE
(Exceeds std)
SUCCESS
(Meets std)
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT o assisted with conducting multiple unit APFT events; motivated Soldiers to improve
n D<I
(Some) (Much) pe1f01mance during each event
n nd. LEADERSHIP
o Mission first
o performed as the Fusion Section Sergeant; supervised two ES and 4 junior enlisted
analysts; stepped up when needed to serve as acting Platoon Sergeant
o demonstrated execptional genuine concern for all the welfare of all unit Soldiers
EXCELLENCE
(Exceeds std}
SUCCESS
(Meets std)
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT o demonstrated strong support of the unit SHARP program
(Some) (Much)
n ~ II ne. TRAINING
duty-related skills
survive and win
EXCELLENCE SUCCESS NEEDSIMPROVEMENT
~ n n nf. RESPONSIBILITY & ACCOUNTABILITY
o Care and maintenance of equipmenl/facilities
EXCELLENCE
(Exceeds std)
n
SUCCESS
(Meets std)
~
NEEDS IMPROVEMENT
(Some) (Much)
n n
o helped to develop and conduct METL situation training to improve the skills of 8
intelligence analysts and 4 intelligence collectors
o conducted PMI training for 14 MI Detachn1ent Soldiers to include proper cleaning
and maintenance of individual weapons
o completed CompTIA San+ certification programs at his full time employment
o assisted the Supply Sergeant in ensuring the weapons maintenance and inspection
requirements were completed to standards for 40 assigned unit weapons
o maintained 100% accountability of all assigned equipment
o encouraged assigned Soldiers to explore and develop their skills in open source
intelligence Internet resem·ch; stessed the value of using all resources available
AMONG THE
BEST
FULLY
CAPABLE MARGINAL
nb. RATER. List 3 positions in which the rated
NCO could besl serve the Army at his/her
Platoon Sergeant
Master Analyst
Warrant Officer
DA FORM 2166-8, OCT 2011
•
o send NCO to WLC as soon as possible
o promote to Sergeant First Class as soon as NCO is able to meet all requirements
o a demonstrated highly intelligent and tactically knovvledgeable Intelligence NCO
o NCO functioned easily at levels above his CUITent assignment; continue to challange
with higher levels of responsibility
1 2 3 4
Successful Fair
D5
Poor
positions of greater responsibility.
DXD D
1 2 3 4
Superior Fair
D
5
Poor
Page 2 of 2
APO PE v1 .02ES

Army Evaluations_Redacted

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Army Evaluations_Redacted

Similar to Army Evaluations_Redacted (20)

Army Evaluations_Redacted