2. INTRODUCTION
FSH and AMH
Predict ovarian reserve at 2 different stages of
follicular development.
FSH: reflect antral and postantral follicular
development
AMH: representative of post primordial preantral
follicular pool
AMH decreases as age increases
FSH increases as age increases.
ABOUBAKR ELNASHAR
3. Acceptable measures of
ovarian reserve
(ASRM, 2015)
predicting response to ovarian stimulation
Prediction of live birth
evidence is controversial
AMH is superior
[Barad et al 15].
AMH,AFC, and quantity of oocytes retrieved were
the most reliable predictors of live birth
[Nelson et al 17].
ABOUBAKR ELNASHAR
4. Discrepancy
between the two markers: difficulty in
Selecting starting dose of GnT
Predicting
response to ovarian stimulation
LBR
Counseling patients
ABOUBAKR ELNASHAR
5. FREQUENCY
20%
[Leader et al , 2014].
43%
(Hussain et al 2013)
30% of cycles
(Wang et al, 2018)
ABOUBAKR ELNASHAR
6. Gleicher et al, 2010
small prospective study
350 reached IVF, excluding women with PCOS.
Normal AMH with abnormal FSH
oocyte yield was diminished compared to normal age
specific AMH and FSH
higher oocyte yield than a normal FSH with abnormal AMH.
Above age 42 y
normal as-FSH predicts good oocyte yields
even with abnormally low AMH.
Under age 42 y
discrepancies between as- FSH and as-AMH
remain similarly predictive of oocyte yields at all
ages.
ABOUBAKR ELNASHAR
7. Buyuk et al, 2011
Reassuring AMH (> 0.6 ng/ml) & elevated FSH (>
10 mIU/ml) Vs. AMH levels < 0.6 ng/ml:
higher oocyte yield
greater number of day 3 embryos
lower cycle cancellation rates
ABOUBAKR ELNASHAR
8. Hussain et al 2013
107 women
discordant groups: AMH/FSH one hormone
normal and the other abnormal
required higher dose of gonadotrophins
ABOUBAKR ELNASHAR
10. Wang et al, 2018
140,000 cycles of ART at over 60 fertility centers.
the largest study to evaluate LBR when AMH and
FSH results were either concordant or discordant.
Patients were categorized into 4 groups:
Good prognosis group (AMH ≥1 ng/ml; FSH < 10 mIU/ml)
Poor prognosis group (AMH < 1 ng/ml; FSH ≥10 mIU/ml),
Reassuring AMH group (AMH ≥1 ng/ml; FSH
≥10 mIU/ml),
Reassuring FSH group (AMH < 1 ng/ml; FSH <
10 mIU/ml).
ABOUBAKR ELNASHAR
12. Reassuring AMH predicted=High FSH, a high AMH
rescues live birth probability (i.e. > 20%) across all
age groups.
significantly higher LBR than the reassuring FSH
group
(22.8% vs 15.6%, p < 0.005).
ABOUBAKR ELNASHAR
13. Normal AMH is a better clinical predictor of cycle
success when AMH and FSH are discordant.
AMH
superior to FSH among all age groups.
more important determinant of pregnancy outcome
than FSH.
Irrespective of FSH value, a low AMH confers
a lower likelihood of LBR among young patients.
This live birth likelihood is even lower for older
patients with low AMH.
ABOUBAKR ELNASHAR
14. Age, AMH, and FSH alone
not sufficient to accurately predict the IVF success
rate.
Model which incorporates
These markers
demographic information
treatment outcomes:
better predict the likelihood of success with IVF
facilitate individualized patient counseling.
ABOUBAKR ELNASHAR
15. CONCLUSION
Discordant AMH & FSH:
oocyte yield was diminished
higher dose of gonadotrophins
AMH appears to be a stronger predictor
Reassuring AMH
better clinical predictor of cycle success.
AMH, and FSH alone
insufficient to predict a patient’s likelihood of LBR.
Prediction models incorporate
these markers
patient demographics
treatment response are needed to provide
accurate prognostic guidance for infertility
specialists to facilitate patient counseling.
ABOUBAKR ELNASHAR
16. You can get this lecture and 420
lecture from:
1.My scientific page on Face book:
Aboubakr Elnashar Lectures.
https://www.facebook.com/groups/2277
44884091351/
2.Slide share web site
3. elnashar53@hotmail.com
4.My clinic: Althwara st, Mansura, Egypt
ABOUBAKR ELNASHAR