This is boger boenninghausen's repertory for reference of homeopathic students.H/o and Evolution of Boger's Repertory.During the later part of 19th century , with the emergence of Kents repertory the applications of Boenninghausen Therapeutic pocket book was relegated to the back stage. Boger was an ardent follower of Boenning Hausen's school of philosophy which in his view was much closer to Hahnemannian concept of disease. While Dr: Boger was practicing in US he understood the difficulties faced by the practitioners of his days in finding out a similimum from the Materia Medica in the shortest possible time. Finding that the practitioners had to depend on the existing faulty translations of the Repertory of Antipsorics he took up the task of translating in 1900.While doing this translation he was further convinced that BH's basic principles plan and construction were sound and the book was comprehensible and practicable. He was also aware of the difficulties faced by practitioners while using Therapeutic pocket book as well as the criticisms levelled against its principles and methodologyWhile doing this translation he was further convinced that BH's basic principles plan and construction were sound and the book was comprehensible and practicable. He was also aware of the difficulties faced by practitioners while using Therapeutic pocket book as well as the criticisms levelled against its principles and methodology.While doing this translation he was further convinced that BH's basic principles plan and construction were sound and the book was comprehensible and practicable. He was also aware of the difficulties faced by practitioners while using Therapeutic pocket book as well as the criticisms levelled against its principles and methodology While doing this translation he was further convinced that BH's basic principles plan and construction were sound and the book was comprehensible and practicable. He was also aware of the difficulties faced by practitioners while using Therapeutic pocket book as well as the criticisms levelled against its principles and methodology