Dr Jarrod Lee
Gastroenterologist &
Advanced Endoscopist
2
Scope
• Helicobacter pylori
• Acute diarrhea in adults
• CRC screening
• Gallstone disease
• Pancreatic cysts
2
Helicobacter
Pylori (HP)
Maastricht V
Consensus
Report 2016
ACG Clinical
Guideline 2017
3Gut 2017; Am J Gastroentrol 2017
HP Gastritis
• Is a distinct clinical entity and may cause dyspepsia
• Treatment relieves dyspepsia in 10% of patients compared
to placebo or acid suppression.
• Has to be excluded before ‘Functional Dyspepsia’ can
be diagnosed.
• May increase or decrease acid secretion
• Treatment may reverse or partially reverse this.
• Long term PPI treatment alters the topography;
eradication heals gastritis in long term PPI users
4
Indications for HP Testing
• ‘Test and treat’ strategy is appropriate for
uninvestigated dyspepsia, except for patients with
alarm symptoms or older patients.
• Aspirin and NSAIDs increase the risk of PUD in
patients with HP – should be tested in users.
• Linked to unexplained iron deficiency anemia,
idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and B12
deficiency – should be tested.
5
Diagnosis
• UBT is the best recommended non-invasive test.
Stool antigen and serology tests may also be used.
• PPI should be stopped > 2 weeks before testing;
antibiotics and bismuth should be stopped > 4 weeks
• UBT is the best option for confirmation of HP
eradication; stool antigen test is an alternative
• Biopsy based tests – new technical considerations
for diagnosis and assessment of gastritis
6
Treatment
• Antibiotic resistant rates are increasing
• History of prior key antibiotic use may predict resistance
• Avoid clarithromycin containing triple therapy if
clarithromycin resistance rate > 15%
• China 50%; Japan 30%
• Singapore resistance: 2016 study
• Clarithromycin 17%; 8% in 2002
• Metronidazole 48%; 25% in 2002
• Dual resistance 4.4%
7Helicobacter 2016
What First Line Regime?
• Non bismuth based quadruple therapy (NBQT): PPI,
amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole
OR
• Bismuth based quadruple therapy (BQT): PPI,
bismuth, tetracycline, metronidazole
• Treatment duration 14 days
• Use high dose 2nd generation PPIs
• Success rate: 85-95%
8
Refractory HP
• Avoid antibiotics that have been used previously
• If fail triple therapy or NBQT, give BQT or
fluoroquinolone based triple or quadruple therapy
• If fail BQT, give fluoroquinolone based therapy
• Consider other antibiotics or rifabutin if suspected
fluoroquinolone resistance
• If fail 2nd line, do culture with susceptibility testing
9
10
Acute
Diarrhea in
Adults
ACG Clinical
Guideline 2016
Am J Gastroenterol 2016
Clinical Definition
• Passage of 3 unformed stools in 24 h
PLUS
• An enteric symptom: nausea/ vomiting, abdominal
pain/ cramps, tenesmus/ fecal urgency, moderate to
severe flatulence
• Severity: effect on daily activities
• Severe: total disability due to diarrhea
• Moderate: able to function with forced change in activities
• Mild: no change in activities
11
Stool Tests
• Traditional methods of diagnosis (FEME, c/s, antigen
testing) fail to reveal the aetiology in most cases
• Even stool leucocytes or lactoferrin imprecise
• Antibiotic sensitivity testing is currently not
recommended
• Low failure rate with empirical antibiotics
• Stool diagnostic tests may be used if: dysentery,
moderate-to-severe disease, symptoms >7 days
12
Treatment
• Oral rehydration: for all patients, need fluid and salt
• Water, juices, sports drinks, soup, saltine crackers
• ORS: for elderly or cholera like diarrhea
• Bismuth subsalicylate: antisecretory; reduces
diarrhea by 40%
• Loperamide: antimotility and antisecretory; reduces
duration of diarrhea
• Probiotics & prebiotics: not recommended for adult
• Adsorbent drugs: not recommended
13
Antibiotics
• Routine empirical antibiotics not recommended
• Most community acquired diarrhea is viral
• Traveller's diarrhea: shortens duration by 1-3 days
• Ciprofloxacin: 750mg once or 500mg OM x 3 days
• Levofloxacin: 500mg once or 500mg x 3 days
• Azithromycin: 1000mg once or 500mg OM x 3 days
• Use if in Southeast Asia or South Asia to cover
fluoroquinolone resistant Campylobacter
• Preferred for dysentery or febrile diarrhea
14
15
Colorectal
Cancer
Screening
USPSTF 2016
USMSTF 2017
16
2016 Guidelines
• USPSTF Guidelines published JAMA 2016
• “Screening tests are not presented in any preferred
or ranked order”
• “Goal is to maximize the total number of persons
who are screened because that will have the largest
effect on reducing colorectal cancer deaths”
17
Recommendations
• Start CRC screening at 50 years, stop at 75 years
• Screening for 75-85 years should be individualized
• Numerous screening tests available
• No head to head studies to demonstrate any test to be
more effective
• Clinicians should engage patients in informed
decision making about the screening strategy
• Patient’s preference
• High adherence over time
18
19
2017 Guidelines
• Represents AGA, ACG, ASGE
• Screening tests ranked into 3 tiers based on
performance, cost and practical consideration
• Optimizes sensitivity and cost effectiveness; leaves
opportunity to offer other tests if patient declines
20
Tiered Ranking of Screening Tests
21
First Tier Tests
• FIT
• Simple, non-invasive
• Need for annual tests
• Colonoscopy
• High sensitivity, single session diagnosis and treatment,
long interval between examination
• Needs bowel preparation; risk of perforation/ bleeding
• Over diagnosis and over treatment of small lesions
• Highly operator dependent; quality control crucial
22
23
When to Screen – Average Risk
• Asymptomatic: 50 years
• < 50 years with colorectal bleeding symptom
• hematochezia, unexplained iron deficiency, malena with
normal OGD
• Stop at 75 years or when life expectancy < 10 years
24
When to Screen – Increased Risk
• 1x FDR > 60 years with CRC or AA
• Start at 40 years
• Screen every 10 years if normal
• 1x FDR < 60 years or 2x FDR any age with CRC or AA
• Start at 40 years or 10 years before youngest family was
diagnosed, whichever is earlier
• Do colonoscopy; screen every 5 years if normal
• Lynch Syndrome, Family Colon Cancer Syndrome X,
polyposis syndromes: refer to specialist
25
Gallstones
EASL Guidelines
2016
26Journal of Hepatol 2016,
Epidemiology & Natural History
• Gallstones are present in 20% of the population
• Higher incidence in females and with age
• 80% remain asymptomatic throughout life
• 20% become symptomatic over 20 years
• Develop at rate of 1-4% per year
• 50% will have recurrent pain after 1st episode
• Complications develop in at 1-3% per year after 1st
colic episode (0.1-0.3% in asymptomatic patients)
27
Diagnosis
• Symptomatic gallstones:
• Biliary colic: episodic attacks of severe pain in RHC or
epigastrium lasting for at least 30min
• Radiation to the right back or shoulder
• Positive reaction to analgesia
• Abdominal ultrasound: > 95% accurate
• If strong clinical suspicion and negative abdominal
ultrasound, do endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)
• Detects another 95% in normal abdominal ultrasound
28
Acute Cholecystitis
• Most common complication, occurs in 10% of
patients with symptomatic gallstones
• Should be suspected in:
• Severe pain lasting several hours
• Fever
• Murphy’s sign positive
• Can do ultrasound or CT scan for diagnosis
29
Treatment
• Biliary colic
• NSAIDs: effective pain relief and prevents progression to
acute cholecystitis
• If severe pain: add antispasmodics, opioids
• Symptomatic gallstones should be treated with
cholecystectomy
• Surgery not recommended for asymptomatic
gallstones
• Bile acid dissolution therapy not recommended
30
Gallbladder Polyps
• Better evaluated with EUS than abdominal
ultrasound (87-97% vs 57-76%)
• Cholecystectomy should be done if polyps > 1cm
• Cholecystectomy may be considered in:
• Patients with polyps 6-10mm and gallbladder stones
• Patients with rapidly growing polyps
• Patients with PSC and polyps (regardless of size)
• Consider surveillance in polyps 6-10mm
31
CBD Stones
• Present in 3-16% of patients with GB stones
• 90% symptomatic, 10% asymptomatic
• Search for CBD stones in patients with jaundice,
acute cholangitis or acute pancreatitis
• LFTs + US abdomen: determine probability of stones
• Predictors: dilated CBD, raised bilirubin, acute cholangitis,
GB stones
• If intermediate probability, do EUS or MRCP
• Proceed to ERCP if diagnosed or high probability
32
Other Complications
• Acute cholangitis
• Suspect based on Charcot’s triad: jaundice, RHC pain, fever
• Do FBC, CRP, LFT, US abdomen
• Confirm CBD stone with EUS if necessary
• Acute pancreatitis
• Suspect if abdominal pain, abnormal LFTs, raised amylase
• Confirm CBD stone with EUS if necessary
• Proceed to ERCP if CBD stone diagnosed
33
Asymptomatic Pancreatic Cysts
AGA Guidelines 2015
34
Initial Assessment
• Estimated 15% prevalence, 25% if > 70 years
• Most often detected incidentally or during screening
• Risk of malignant transformation 0.25% per year
• Preferred imaging modality: MRI pancreas
• High risk features:
• Size > 3cm
• Dilated main pancreatic duct
• Solid component
35
Further Management
• If no high risk feature, repeat MRI in 1 year, then
every 2 years up to 5 years
• If no change at 5 years, stop surveillance
• If high risk feature, do EUS-FNA
• If no concerning result, surveillance as above
• If concerning result, consider surgery as 15% will have
invasive cancer
36
Conclusion
• New GI guidelines
have been published
and apply primary
care
• Family physicians will
need to consider
adopting them in
their daily practice
37
Thank
You
Questions?
38

Updates in GI practice guideline

  • 1.
    Dr Jarrod Lee Gastroenterologist& Advanced Endoscopist
  • 2.
    2 Scope • Helicobacter pylori •Acute diarrhea in adults • CRC screening • Gallstone disease • Pancreatic cysts 2
  • 3.
    Helicobacter Pylori (HP) Maastricht V Consensus Report2016 ACG Clinical Guideline 2017 3Gut 2017; Am J Gastroentrol 2017
  • 4.
    HP Gastritis • Isa distinct clinical entity and may cause dyspepsia • Treatment relieves dyspepsia in 10% of patients compared to placebo or acid suppression. • Has to be excluded before ‘Functional Dyspepsia’ can be diagnosed. • May increase or decrease acid secretion • Treatment may reverse or partially reverse this. • Long term PPI treatment alters the topography; eradication heals gastritis in long term PPI users 4
  • 5.
    Indications for HPTesting • ‘Test and treat’ strategy is appropriate for uninvestigated dyspepsia, except for patients with alarm symptoms or older patients. • Aspirin and NSAIDs increase the risk of PUD in patients with HP – should be tested in users. • Linked to unexplained iron deficiency anemia, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and B12 deficiency – should be tested. 5
  • 6.
    Diagnosis • UBT isthe best recommended non-invasive test. Stool antigen and serology tests may also be used. • PPI should be stopped > 2 weeks before testing; antibiotics and bismuth should be stopped > 4 weeks • UBT is the best option for confirmation of HP eradication; stool antigen test is an alternative • Biopsy based tests – new technical considerations for diagnosis and assessment of gastritis 6
  • 7.
    Treatment • Antibiotic resistantrates are increasing • History of prior key antibiotic use may predict resistance • Avoid clarithromycin containing triple therapy if clarithromycin resistance rate > 15% • China 50%; Japan 30% • Singapore resistance: 2016 study • Clarithromycin 17%; 8% in 2002 • Metronidazole 48%; 25% in 2002 • Dual resistance 4.4% 7Helicobacter 2016
  • 8.
    What First LineRegime? • Non bismuth based quadruple therapy (NBQT): PPI, amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole OR • Bismuth based quadruple therapy (BQT): PPI, bismuth, tetracycline, metronidazole • Treatment duration 14 days • Use high dose 2nd generation PPIs • Success rate: 85-95% 8
  • 9.
    Refractory HP • Avoidantibiotics that have been used previously • If fail triple therapy or NBQT, give BQT or fluoroquinolone based triple or quadruple therapy • If fail BQT, give fluoroquinolone based therapy • Consider other antibiotics or rifabutin if suspected fluoroquinolone resistance • If fail 2nd line, do culture with susceptibility testing 9
  • 10.
  • 11.
    Clinical Definition • Passageof 3 unformed stools in 24 h PLUS • An enteric symptom: nausea/ vomiting, abdominal pain/ cramps, tenesmus/ fecal urgency, moderate to severe flatulence • Severity: effect on daily activities • Severe: total disability due to diarrhea • Moderate: able to function with forced change in activities • Mild: no change in activities 11
  • 12.
    Stool Tests • Traditionalmethods of diagnosis (FEME, c/s, antigen testing) fail to reveal the aetiology in most cases • Even stool leucocytes or lactoferrin imprecise • Antibiotic sensitivity testing is currently not recommended • Low failure rate with empirical antibiotics • Stool diagnostic tests may be used if: dysentery, moderate-to-severe disease, symptoms >7 days 12
  • 13.
    Treatment • Oral rehydration:for all patients, need fluid and salt • Water, juices, sports drinks, soup, saltine crackers • ORS: for elderly or cholera like diarrhea • Bismuth subsalicylate: antisecretory; reduces diarrhea by 40% • Loperamide: antimotility and antisecretory; reduces duration of diarrhea • Probiotics & prebiotics: not recommended for adult • Adsorbent drugs: not recommended 13
  • 14.
    Antibiotics • Routine empiricalantibiotics not recommended • Most community acquired diarrhea is viral • Traveller's diarrhea: shortens duration by 1-3 days • Ciprofloxacin: 750mg once or 500mg OM x 3 days • Levofloxacin: 500mg once or 500mg x 3 days • Azithromycin: 1000mg once or 500mg OM x 3 days • Use if in Southeast Asia or South Asia to cover fluoroquinolone resistant Campylobacter • Preferred for dysentery or febrile diarrhea 14
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 17.
    2016 Guidelines • USPSTFGuidelines published JAMA 2016 • “Screening tests are not presented in any preferred or ranked order” • “Goal is to maximize the total number of persons who are screened because that will have the largest effect on reducing colorectal cancer deaths” 17
  • 18.
    Recommendations • Start CRCscreening at 50 years, stop at 75 years • Screening for 75-85 years should be individualized • Numerous screening tests available • No head to head studies to demonstrate any test to be more effective • Clinicians should engage patients in informed decision making about the screening strategy • Patient’s preference • High adherence over time 18
  • 19.
  • 20.
    2017 Guidelines • RepresentsAGA, ACG, ASGE • Screening tests ranked into 3 tiers based on performance, cost and practical consideration • Optimizes sensitivity and cost effectiveness; leaves opportunity to offer other tests if patient declines 20
  • 21.
    Tiered Ranking ofScreening Tests 21
  • 22.
    First Tier Tests •FIT • Simple, non-invasive • Need for annual tests • Colonoscopy • High sensitivity, single session diagnosis and treatment, long interval between examination • Needs bowel preparation; risk of perforation/ bleeding • Over diagnosis and over treatment of small lesions • Highly operator dependent; quality control crucial 22
  • 23.
  • 24.
    When to Screen– Average Risk • Asymptomatic: 50 years • < 50 years with colorectal bleeding symptom • hematochezia, unexplained iron deficiency, malena with normal OGD • Stop at 75 years or when life expectancy < 10 years 24
  • 25.
    When to Screen– Increased Risk • 1x FDR > 60 years with CRC or AA • Start at 40 years • Screen every 10 years if normal • 1x FDR < 60 years or 2x FDR any age with CRC or AA • Start at 40 years or 10 years before youngest family was diagnosed, whichever is earlier • Do colonoscopy; screen every 5 years if normal • Lynch Syndrome, Family Colon Cancer Syndrome X, polyposis syndromes: refer to specialist 25
  • 26.
  • 27.
    Epidemiology & NaturalHistory • Gallstones are present in 20% of the population • Higher incidence in females and with age • 80% remain asymptomatic throughout life • 20% become symptomatic over 20 years • Develop at rate of 1-4% per year • 50% will have recurrent pain after 1st episode • Complications develop in at 1-3% per year after 1st colic episode (0.1-0.3% in asymptomatic patients) 27
  • 28.
    Diagnosis • Symptomatic gallstones: •Biliary colic: episodic attacks of severe pain in RHC or epigastrium lasting for at least 30min • Radiation to the right back or shoulder • Positive reaction to analgesia • Abdominal ultrasound: > 95% accurate • If strong clinical suspicion and negative abdominal ultrasound, do endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) • Detects another 95% in normal abdominal ultrasound 28
  • 29.
    Acute Cholecystitis • Mostcommon complication, occurs in 10% of patients with symptomatic gallstones • Should be suspected in: • Severe pain lasting several hours • Fever • Murphy’s sign positive • Can do ultrasound or CT scan for diagnosis 29
  • 30.
    Treatment • Biliary colic •NSAIDs: effective pain relief and prevents progression to acute cholecystitis • If severe pain: add antispasmodics, opioids • Symptomatic gallstones should be treated with cholecystectomy • Surgery not recommended for asymptomatic gallstones • Bile acid dissolution therapy not recommended 30
  • 31.
    Gallbladder Polyps • Betterevaluated with EUS than abdominal ultrasound (87-97% vs 57-76%) • Cholecystectomy should be done if polyps > 1cm • Cholecystectomy may be considered in: • Patients with polyps 6-10mm and gallbladder stones • Patients with rapidly growing polyps • Patients with PSC and polyps (regardless of size) • Consider surveillance in polyps 6-10mm 31
  • 32.
    CBD Stones • Presentin 3-16% of patients with GB stones • 90% symptomatic, 10% asymptomatic • Search for CBD stones in patients with jaundice, acute cholangitis or acute pancreatitis • LFTs + US abdomen: determine probability of stones • Predictors: dilated CBD, raised bilirubin, acute cholangitis, GB stones • If intermediate probability, do EUS or MRCP • Proceed to ERCP if diagnosed or high probability 32
  • 33.
    Other Complications • Acutecholangitis • Suspect based on Charcot’s triad: jaundice, RHC pain, fever • Do FBC, CRP, LFT, US abdomen • Confirm CBD stone with EUS if necessary • Acute pancreatitis • Suspect if abdominal pain, abnormal LFTs, raised amylase • Confirm CBD stone with EUS if necessary • Proceed to ERCP if CBD stone diagnosed 33
  • 34.
  • 35.
    Initial Assessment • Estimated15% prevalence, 25% if > 70 years • Most often detected incidentally or during screening • Risk of malignant transformation 0.25% per year • Preferred imaging modality: MRI pancreas • High risk features: • Size > 3cm • Dilated main pancreatic duct • Solid component 35
  • 36.
    Further Management • Ifno high risk feature, repeat MRI in 1 year, then every 2 years up to 5 years • If no change at 5 years, stop surveillance • If high risk feature, do EUS-FNA • If no concerning result, surveillance as above • If concerning result, consider surgery as 15% will have invasive cancer 36
  • 37.
    Conclusion • New GIguidelines have been published and apply primary care • Family physicians will need to consider adopting them in their daily practice 37
  • 38.