1. An Introduction to Outcome Mapping ICTJ January 9, 2008

3. focus of linear- cause and effect framework

4. focus of outcome mapping Behavioural Changes community capacity & ownership increases program ownership decreases

8. step 1: Vision

9. I have an objectively verifiable indicator of success! Martin Luther King, Jr. August 28, 1963

10. ICTJ examples of Vision The vision of ICTJ fellowships is to strengthen and increase the prominence of transitional justice norms; to improve state compliance with international obligations; to advance prospects for justice, peace and accountability especially after periods of repressive rule or violent conflict, and to energize civil society world-wide.

12. step 2: Mission Intentional Design

13. The mission is that “bite” of the vision statement on which the program is going to focus.

16. Vision vs Mission - Fellowships The vision of ICTJ fellowships is to strengthen and increase the prominence of transitional justice norms; to improve state compliance with international obligations; to advance prospects for justice, peace and accountability especially after periods of repressive rule or violent conflict, and to energize civil society world-wide. Vision Mission The mission of ICTJ Fellowships is to assist in the development of integrated, comprehensive, and localized approaches to TJ by: building TJ capacity among civil society organizations, encouraging these organizations to consider how TJ methodologies are applied to their work, and fostering networks and partnerships for collaboration among TJ practitioners

17. Vision vs Mission – Peru Program The vision of the Peru country program is to promote and protect human rights, ensure that human rights abusers are held accountable for their actions, encourage the rule of law, and promote an equitable distribution of resources within areas affected by conflict. Vision Mission The mission of the ICTJ Peru Country program is to assist in the development of integrated and comprehensive strategies on truth seeking, reparations, and prosecutions.

18. step 3: Boundary Partners

20. Whose behaviour? Program time limit of the initiative = boundary partners The rest of the world

21. Boundary Partners Those individuals, groups, & organizations with whom a program interacts directly to effect change & with whom the program can anticipate some opportunities for influence.

22. Military Police Local H.R. Orgs Victims’ Groups. TRCs Domestic Prosecutors Govts Int’l Bodies ICTJ Program Community Leaders Victims

24. step 4: Outcome Challenge

25. Outcome Challenge Once the boundary partners have been identified, outcome challenges are developed for each boundary partner. An outcome challenge describes how behaviors, relationships, activities, actions of an individual, group, or institution will change if the program is successful. In other words: OCs are idealistic, yet realistic. They are phrased in such a way as to capture how the actor would behave and relate to others if the program achieved its full potential as facilitator of change.

26. Outcome Challenge – Fellowship Program Boundary Partner = Fellows Outcome Challenge = If the program achieves full potential, fellows will act as “TJ Entrepreneurs” in their countries. They will demonstrate an understanding of TJ theory and practice, enabling them to analyze TJ issues and challenges in their countries. Fellows will also take active roles in promoting TJ knowledge, disseminating materials, and develop partnerships with relevant government and NGO actors.

28. What indicators do you use for: Greater awareness… Empowered women… Reduced conflict… Increased collaboration… Gender sensitivity… Equal access… Full participation… Strengthened capacity… Enhanced effectiveness… ?

29. step 5: Progress Markers

30. Progress Markers = ladder of change (Deep transformation) (Active engagement & learning) (Early positive responses) Love to see Like to see Expect to see

37. step 6: Strategy Maps Intentional Design

38. 6 kinds of strategies causal persuasive supportive I aimed at individual boundary partner direct influence arouse new thinking; build skills, capacity on-going support E aimed at boundary partner’s environment alter the physical, regulatory or information environmen t broad information dissemination; access to new info create / strengthen peer networks

39. facilitation questions ? I-2 I-3 I-1 E-1 E-2 E-3 causal persuasive supportive I aimed at individual boundary partner what will be done to produce and “immediate output”? what will be done to build capacity? how will sustained support, guidance or mentoring be provided? E aimed at boundary partner’s environment what will be done to alter the physical or policy environment? how will the media or publications be used? what networks or relationships will be established or utilized?

41. step 7: Organizational Practices Intentional Design