SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 19
Prof.Dr.Ing. David Luigi FUSCHI
Project life cycle
Definition
Proposal
PlanningExecution
Phase-out
Analyse
Plan
Execute
Project life cycle
Definition Proposal Planning Execution Phase-out
Definition Proposal Planning Execution Phase-out
Overall personnel effort
Definition Proposal
Project n
Project n+1
Project n+2
Contract
Project life cycle
Definition
• Business
needs
• Deliverables
• Project
boundaries
• Success
criteria
Proposal
• Scope
• Milestones
• Budget
• Risks
• Team
Planning
• Implementation
• Training
• Integration
• Budget
• Critical path
Execution
• Development
• Testing
• Training
• Monitoring
• Adjusting
Phase-out
• Go-live
• Turnover to
support
• Reassign
• Improve
• Maintenance
Charter
approved
Proposal
approved
System
manual
Hand-out
approved
Plan
approved
Business Technical
Business
Needs
Starting point
 Clearly define objectives and outcomes
 Set out the SoA and the progress
planned in the proposal
 Describe the activities to be performed
Example 1 1 48 1.00 MGT 48
2 1 48 11.00 RTD 48
3 4 42 37.00 RTD 39
4 1 48 0.00 RTD 48
5 1 48 10.00 RTD 48
6 7 42 0.00 RTD 36
7 1 48 2.00 RTD 48
8 18 48 3.50 DEM 31
9 1 48 3.00 OTH 48
67.50
100.0%
WP Description Start End Effort Dur.
Consortium Management
Creative Media Experience
Metadata Semantics & WF for netw orked spactial media
Image & metedata capure & coding
Production for spatial media
Distribution & display
Route to exploitation
Demonstration of new technologies & experimental productions
Dissemination
Nature
Project structure
Total
Relative weight in %
Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4
Effort Effort Effort Effort Effort Weight
1 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 1.00 1.5%
2 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 11.00 16.3%
3 8.54 11.38 11.38 5.69 37.00 54.8%
4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0%
5 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 10.00 14.8%
6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0%
7 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 2.00 3.0%
8 0.00 0.79 1.35 1.35 3.50 5.2%
9 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 3.00 4.4%
15.29 18.92 19.49 13.80 67.50 100.0%
22.6% 28.0% 28.9% 20.4% 100.0%Relative weight in %
Total
Production for spatial media
Distribution & display
Dissemination
Linear yearly workload (MM)
Total
Metadata Semantics & WF for netw orked spactial media
Image & metedata capure & coding
WP Description
Consortium Management
Creative Media Experience
Route to exploitation
Demonstration of new technologies & experimental productions
Planning
 Prepare a Work Break Down Structure (WBS)
 Assign roles and responsibilities
2008 2009
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 1 48 1.00 48 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2 1 48 11.00 48 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23
3 4 42 37.00 39 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
4 1 48 0.00 48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 1 48 10.00 48 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21
6 7 42 0.00 36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
7 1 48 2.00 48 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04
8 18 48 3.50 31
9 1 48 3.00 48 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
0.56 0.56 0.56 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51
0.56 1.13 1.69 3.20 4.71 6.22 7.73 9.24 10.75 12.27 13.78 15.29
1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
23%
Project Gant Chart
WP Description Start End Effort Dur.
Consortium Management
Creative Media Experience
Metadata Semantics & WF for netw orked spactial media
Image & metedata capure & coding
Production for spatial media
Route to exploitation
Demonstration of new technologies & experimental productions
Distribution & display
Dissemination
Relative w eight on overall effort (%) 100%
Total effort 67.50
Cumulated Effort
Example
WP Work package title 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
1 Management and quality assurance
1.1 Consortium Management t M1.1 t M1.3
1.1.1 Project Co-ordination
1.1.2 Project Quality Assurance t M1.2
1.1.3 Project Risk Assessment & Management
1.2 Project Administration & quality assurance
2 New approaches to ICT learning, training and education
2.1 Identification of gaps in ICT education/training landscape t M2.1
2.2 Turning identified gaps into educational requirements
2.3 Roadmap for the definition of new ICT training programmes t M2.2
3 Support to Clusters and Grand Coalition
3.1 Identification of best practices in the targeted clusters t M3.2
3.2 Online collaboration and discussion platform t M3.1
3.3 Guidelines for efficient ICT jobs match making t M3.3
4 Exploration of national platforms supporting labour market matching
4.1 Identification of good/bad practices, recommendations
4.2 Provision of a service for labour market matching t M4.1
4.4 Support in creation of new regional/national platforms
5 Impact evaluation
5.1 Pilot actions in each cluster
5.2 Stakeholders acceptance evaluation t M5.1
6 Outreach and sustainability
6.1 Outreach and promotion planning t M6.3
6.2 Sustainability planning t M6.2
6.3 Community building t M6.1 t M6.4
Milestones
M1.1Project Inception, M1 M3.3 Initial version of project guidelines release, M12
M1.2 Quality Assurance inception, M2 M4.1Experimental labour market matching light service release, M10
M1.3 Project Closure, M24 M5.1Impact Assessment, M24
M2.1Initial gaps and requirements identification, M8 M6.1Portal availability, M4
M2.2 ICT Education Roadmap release, M24 M6.2 Sustainability strategy delivery, M6
M3.1Collaboration platform release, M6 M6.3 Communication strategy implementation, M12
M3.2 Initial best/bad practices identification, M6 M6.4 Outreach strategy implementation, M24
Budgeting
 Based on Work Break Down Structure
(WBS) and responsibilities estimate
personnel effort
 Evaluate the effort based on prior
experience
 Evaluate the number of meetings and
travels
 Estimate the needed equipment
Example
2008 2009
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 1 48 1.00 48 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02
2 1 48 11.00 48 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23
3 4 42 37.00 39 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
4 1 48 0.00 48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5 1 48 10.00 48 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21
6 7 42 0.00 36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
7 1 48 2.00 48 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04
8 18 48 3.50 31
9 1 48 3.00 48 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06
0.56 0.56 0.56 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51
0.56 1.13 1.69 3.20 4.71 6.22 7.73 9.24 10.75 12.27 13.78 15.29
1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2%
2008 2009
Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1 Y 0.16 0.05 0.60 0.45
15 Y 0.52 0.30 0.30 0.30 1.00 1.00
28 Y 0.50 0.50
33 Y 0.72 0.67 0.58 0.68 0.50 0.55 0.38 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.80 1.00
0.88 0.67 0.58 0.68 0.50 1.07 0.38 0.51 0.46 0.46 2.90 2.95
0.56 0.56 0.56 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51
-0.32 -0.11 -0.02 0.83 1.01 0.44 1.13 1.00 1.05 1.05 -1.39 -1.44
23%
Use
(Y/N)
ZHU Meng
CHOUDRI Said
Planned (c)
Delta (c - a)
Total (a)
Project Gant Chart
WP Description Start End Effort Dur.
Consortium Management
Creative Media Experience
Metadata Semantics & WF for netw orked spactial media
Image & metedata capure & coding
Production for spatial media
Route to exploitation
Demonstration of new technologies & experimental productions
Distribution & display
Dissemination
Project Effort Actual Deployment
ID
Relative w eight on overall effort (%) 100%
Total effort 67.50
Cumulated Effort
Effort per Resource
BADII Atta
FUSCHI David Luigi
Budgeting
 Estimate consumables
 Estimate other relevant costs
2008
M ar Apr M ay Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Y 3,858.17£ 2,792.49£ 2,417.38£ 2,834.17£ 2,083.95£ 3,625.66£ 1,583.80£ 1,703.99£ 1,436.08£ 1,43£
N -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ £
N -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ £
N -£ 123.90£ -£ 322.56£ 95.60£ -£ -£ 235.60£ 625.71£ 35£
N -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ £
N -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ £
N -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ £
-£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ £
2,314.90£ 1,749.83£ 1,450.43£ 1,894.04£ 1,307.73£ 2,175.40£ 950.28£ 1,163.75£ 1,237.08£ 1,07£
6,173.07£ 4,666.22£ 3,867.80£ 5,050.76£ 3,487.27£ 5,801.05£ 2,534.08£ 3,103.34£ 3,298.87£ 2,86£
Use
(Y/N)
Monthly Expenditures
N
DirectIn-
Other specific
Computing
Travels
Personnel
Equipment
Overheads
Adjustments
Total
Project Expenditures
Consumables
Other
Audit
Subcontracting
IPR Protection
Example
77%
20%
3%
Direct Costs Allocation
Personnel
Travel
Other direct
Item Cost Ratio Funding
Personnel 716,447.0 76.7% 716,447
Travel 186,000.0 19.9% 186,000
Consumables 2,000.0 0.2% 2,000
Other 10,000.0 1.1% 10,000
Advisory 20,000.0 2.1% 20,000
Total Direct 934,447.0 100.0% 934,447
Indirect (7%) 65,414.0 65,414
Total 999,861.0 999,861
Travel item Cost Qtty Total
Flight 200 2 400
Hotel 100 4 400
Subsistence 50 4 200
Total 10 1000
Example
01/03/2008 Project Accounting and Operational Currency
29/02/2012 Organisation Standard Operation Currency
48.0 0.7660000 03/03/2008
4.0
Date Estimate Actual
01/03/2008 04/03/2009 0.9093000 0.9093000
29/02/2012 04/03/2010 0.9930000
48.0 04/03/2011 0.9930000
4.0 03/03/2012 0.9930000
N 03/04/2009
(1)
if needed and applicable
(2)
used for future periods .
3
12
Reporting frequency (Months)
Financial rep. freq. (Months)
Project Short Name
Actual dates
2020 3D MEDIA
2020 3D MEDIA Spatial Sound And Vision
ICT-FP7-215475
Project Full Name
Contract ref.
Exchange Rate(1)
for estimates(2)
H5045300
Project Start Date Exchange Rate(1)
for reporting Period 1
Exchange Rate(1)
for reporting Period 2
Exchange Rate(1)
for reporting Period 3
Exchange Rate(1)
for reporting Period 4
Internal Code
Planned Start Date
Planned End Date
Planned Duration (Months)
Project End Date
Planned Duration (Years)
Planned Duration (Years)
Reporting frequencies
Extended (Y/N)
Project References
Exchange Rate(1)
at project signature / onset
EUR
GBP
Planning dates Accounting summary
Exchange rates
60%Project Overhead %
0.9930000
Project Duration (Months)
Example
Budget in EUR RTD Demo Training Coord. Support Manag. Other Total
Personnel 318,460.00 17,220.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,690.63 17,760.63 364,131.88
Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consumables 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Travel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Computing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other specific costs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
IPR Protection 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub-Total 318,460.00 17,220.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,690.63 17,760.63 364,131.88
Subcontracting 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Overheads 191,076.00 10,332.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,414.38 10,656.38 218,479.13
509,536.00 27,553.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,105.00 28,417.00 582,611.00
382,152.00 13,777.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,105.00 28,417.00 441,451.00
75% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 76%
Total Cost
Project Budget
Direct
Funding
Allow ed Funding %
In-
Budget in EUR Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Total
Personnel 82,474.31 102,091.45 105,136.76 74,429.35 364,131.88
Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consumables 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Travel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Computing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other specific costs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
IPR Protection 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub-Total 82,474.31 102,091.45 105,136.76 74,429.35 364,131.88
Subcontracting 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Overheads 49,484.59 61,254.87 63,082.06 44,657.61 218,479.13
131,958.90 163,346.33 168,218.82 119,086.95 582,611.00
99,986.76 123,769.37 127,461.32 90,233.54 441,451.00
23% 28% 29% 20% 100%
In-Direct
Total Cost
Funding
Expected yearly load %
Budget linear distribution on project time-span
Example
Costs in EUR Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Total
Personnel 48,915.58 11,790.57 0.00 0.00 60,706.15
Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consumables 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Travel 2,548.39 8,654.99 11,710.74 0.00 22,914.12
Computing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other specific costs 0.00 0.00 37.30 0.00 37.30
IPR Protection 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub-Total 51,463.97 20,445.57 11,748.04 0.00 83,657.57
Subcontracting 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Overheads 30,878.38 12,267.34 7,048.82 0.00 50,194.54
82,342.34 32,712.91 18,796.86 0.00 133,852.11Total Cost
Actual Project Cost on project time-span (b)
DirectIn-
Budget in EUR Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Total
Personnel 82,474.31 102,091.45 105,136.76 74,429.35 364,131.88
Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consumables 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Travel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Computing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other specific costs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
IPR Protection 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub-Total 82,474.31 102,091.45 105,136.76 74,429.35 364,131.88
Subcontracting 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Overheads 49,484.59 61,254.87 63,082.06 44,657.61 218,479.13
131,958.90 163,346.33 168,218.82 119,086.95 582,611.00
In-
Total Cost
Budgeted Project Cost on project time-span (a)
Direct
Example
Costs in EUR Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Total
Personnel 33,558.74 90,300.88 105,136.76 74,429.35 303,425.73
Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consumables 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Travel -2,548.39 -8,654.99 -11,710.74 0.00 -22,914.12
Computing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other specific costs 0.00 0.00 -37.30 0.00 -37.30
IPR Protection 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub-Total 31,010.35 81,645.89 93,388.73 74,429.35 280,474.31
Subcontracting 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Overheads 18,606.21 48,987.53 56,033.24 44,657.61 168,284.58
49,616.56 130,633.42 149,421.96 119,086.95 448,758.89
Delta in respect to planned (a-b)
DirectIn-
Total Cost
Costs in EUR Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Total
Personnel 48,915.58 11,790.57 0.00 0.00 60,706.15
Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Consumables 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Travel 2,548.39 8,654.99 11,710.74 0.00 22,914.12
Computing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Other specific costs 0.00 0.00 37.30 0.00 37.30
IPR Protection 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Sub-Total 51,463.97 20,445.57 11,748.04 0.00 83,657.57
Subcontracting 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Overheads 30,878.38 12,267.34 7,048.82 0.00 50,194.54
82,342.34 32,712.91 18,796.86 0.00 133,852.11Total Cost
Actual Project Cost on project time-span (b)
DirectIn-
Sources of Standards
 Project Management Institute (PMI)
 Association for Project Management (APM)
 International Project Management
Association (IPMA)
OGC ISO 21500
Sources of information
Project management
 http://www.pmi.org/
 http://ipma.ch/
 http://www.apm.org.uk/
Business
 http://www.businessballs.com/
Questions?

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Universities and International Business Development
Universities and International Business DevelopmentUniversities and International Business Development
Universities and International Business DevelopmentDavid Luigi FUSCHI Ph.D.
 
The Arab World Online 2014
The Arab World Online 2014The Arab World Online 2014
The Arab World Online 2014solerfuture
 
Contingent Workflow Modelling for a Didactic Approach to Project Management i...
Contingent Workflow Modelling for a Didactic Approach to Project Management i...Contingent Workflow Modelling for a Didactic Approach to Project Management i...
Contingent Workflow Modelling for a Didactic Approach to Project Management i...David Luigi FUSCHI Ph.D.
 
Evolutionary Problems In Aspect Oriented Software Development
Evolutionary Problems In Aspect Oriented Software DevelopmentEvolutionary Problems In Aspect Oriented Software Development
Evolutionary Problems In Aspect Oriented Software Developmentkim.mens
 

Viewers also liked (10)

Universities and International Business Development
Universities and International Business DevelopmentUniversities and International Business Development
Universities and International Business Development
 
ResearchMethodosAndEthicsV3
ResearchMethodosAndEthicsV3ResearchMethodosAndEthicsV3
ResearchMethodosAndEthicsV3
 
The Arab World Online 2014
The Arab World Online 2014The Arab World Online 2014
The Arab World Online 2014
 
EMCIS 2013 the vista-project
EMCIS 2013 the vista-projectEMCIS 2013 the vista-project
EMCIS 2013 the vista-project
 
Observing horizons for smarter business
Observing horizons for smarter businessObserving horizons for smarter business
Observing horizons for smarter business
 
Contingent Workflow Modelling for a Didactic Approach to Project Management i...
Contingent Workflow Modelling for a Didactic Approach to Project Management i...Contingent Workflow Modelling for a Didactic Approach to Project Management i...
Contingent Workflow Modelling for a Didactic Approach to Project Management i...
 
BC-SVLL-Presentation
BC-SVLL-PresentationBC-SVLL-Presentation
BC-SVLL-Presentation
 
April2015-MBAcademyKeyNote
April2015-MBAcademyKeyNoteApril2015-MBAcademyKeyNote
April2015-MBAcademyKeyNote
 
Ethnography
EthnographyEthnography
Ethnography
 
Evolutionary Problems In Aspect Oriented Software Development
Evolutionary Problems In Aspect Oriented Software DevelopmentEvolutionary Problems In Aspect Oriented Software Development
Evolutionary Problems In Aspect Oriented Software Development
 

Similar to Project life cycle definition, proposal, planning, execution, and phase-out

Howe Street Basic Project Approach
Howe Street Basic Project ApproachHowe Street Basic Project Approach
Howe Street Basic Project ApproachJasonLhota1
 
Scott-Macon Aerospace, Defense and Government Services (June 2017)
Scott-Macon Aerospace, Defense and Government Services (June 2017)Scott-Macon Aerospace, Defense and Government Services (June 2017)
Scott-Macon Aerospace, Defense and Government Services (June 2017)Michael Papazis
 
Scott-Macon Aerospace, Defense and Government Services (May 2017)
Scott-Macon Aerospace, Defense and Government Services (May 2017)Scott-Macon Aerospace, Defense and Government Services (May 2017)
Scott-Macon Aerospace, Defense and Government Services (May 2017)Michael Papazis
 
Market Sizing Study
Market Sizing StudyMarket Sizing Study
Market Sizing StudyCABA
 
Lecture notes 2NG3S226_Lecture_5.pptxManufacturing System.docx
Lecture notes 2NG3S226_Lecture_5.pptxManufacturing System.docxLecture notes 2NG3S226_Lecture_5.pptxManufacturing System.docx
Lecture notes 2NG3S226_Lecture_5.pptxManufacturing System.docxSHIVA101531
 
Project, Program and Portfolio Management Training and Support
Project, Program and Portfolio Management Training and SupportProject, Program and Portfolio Management Training and Support
Project, Program and Portfolio Management Training and Supportfrancesca_beddow
 
Driving Innovation with Kanban at Jaguar Land Rover
Driving Innovation with Kanban at Jaguar Land RoverDriving Innovation with Kanban at Jaguar Land Rover
Driving Innovation with Kanban at Jaguar Land RoverLeanKit
 
1. Why was Unicord successful in Thailand Describe the opportuni.docx
1. Why was Unicord successful in Thailand  Describe the opportuni.docx1. Why was Unicord successful in Thailand  Describe the opportuni.docx
1. Why was Unicord successful in Thailand Describe the opportuni.docxpaynetawnya
 
Webinar - Slimme besluitvorming over project-portfolio’s in asset management
Webinar - Slimme besluitvorming over project-portfolio’s in asset managementWebinar - Slimme besluitvorming over project-portfolio’s in asset management
Webinar - Slimme besluitvorming over project-portfolio’s in asset managementStork
 
Kick-off Meeting of the Advisory Group for the OECD Guidelines for Measuring ...
Kick-off Meeting of the Advisory Group for the OECD Guidelines for Measuring ...Kick-off Meeting of the Advisory Group for the OECD Guidelines for Measuring ...
Kick-off Meeting of the Advisory Group for the OECD Guidelines for Measuring ...StatsCommunications
 
Project Deliverables PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Project Deliverables PowerPoint Presentation SlidesProject Deliverables PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Project Deliverables PowerPoint Presentation SlidesSlideTeam
 
Project Deliverables Powerpoint Presentation Slides
Project Deliverables Powerpoint Presentation SlidesProject Deliverables Powerpoint Presentation Slides
Project Deliverables Powerpoint Presentation SlidesSlideTeam
 

Similar to Project life cycle definition, proposal, planning, execution, and phase-out (20)

JTP - EV Presentation
JTP - EV PresentationJTP - EV Presentation
JTP - EV Presentation
 
004 benchmarking and productivity
004 benchmarking and productivity004 benchmarking and productivity
004 benchmarking and productivity
 
Strategic direction setting
Strategic direction settingStrategic direction setting
Strategic direction setting
 
Howe Street Basic Project Approach
Howe Street Basic Project ApproachHowe Street Basic Project Approach
Howe Street Basic Project Approach
 
Scott-Macon Aerospace, Defense and Government Services (June 2017)
Scott-Macon Aerospace, Defense and Government Services (June 2017)Scott-Macon Aerospace, Defense and Government Services (June 2017)
Scott-Macon Aerospace, Defense and Government Services (June 2017)
 
Scott-Macon Aerospace, Defense and Government Services (May 2017)
Scott-Macon Aerospace, Defense and Government Services (May 2017)Scott-Macon Aerospace, Defense and Government Services (May 2017)
Scott-Macon Aerospace, Defense and Government Services (May 2017)
 
Market Sizing Study
Market Sizing StudyMarket Sizing Study
Market Sizing Study
 
Lecture notes 2NG3S226_Lecture_5.pptxManufacturing System.docx
Lecture notes 2NG3S226_Lecture_5.pptxManufacturing System.docxLecture notes 2NG3S226_Lecture_5.pptxManufacturing System.docx
Lecture notes 2NG3S226_Lecture_5.pptxManufacturing System.docx
 
Leading change
Leading changeLeading change
Leading change
 
Training Module
Training ModuleTraining Module
Training Module
 
Project, Program and Portfolio Management Training and Support
Project, Program and Portfolio Management Training and SupportProject, Program and Portfolio Management Training and Support
Project, Program and Portfolio Management Training and Support
 
Driving Innovation with Kanban at Jaguar Land Rover
Driving Innovation with Kanban at Jaguar Land RoverDriving Innovation with Kanban at Jaguar Land Rover
Driving Innovation with Kanban at Jaguar Land Rover
 
1. Why was Unicord successful in Thailand Describe the opportuni.docx
1. Why was Unicord successful in Thailand  Describe the opportuni.docx1. Why was Unicord successful in Thailand  Describe the opportuni.docx
1. Why was Unicord successful in Thailand Describe the opportuni.docx
 
Presentation Studyspot
Presentation StudyspotPresentation Studyspot
Presentation Studyspot
 
Canon Meeting
Canon MeetingCanon Meeting
Canon Meeting
 
Travel_Time_Reliability
Travel_Time_ReliabilityTravel_Time_Reliability
Travel_Time_Reliability
 
Webinar - Slimme besluitvorming over project-portfolio’s in asset management
Webinar - Slimme besluitvorming over project-portfolio’s in asset managementWebinar - Slimme besluitvorming over project-portfolio’s in asset management
Webinar - Slimme besluitvorming over project-portfolio’s in asset management
 
Kick-off Meeting of the Advisory Group for the OECD Guidelines for Measuring ...
Kick-off Meeting of the Advisory Group for the OECD Guidelines for Measuring ...Kick-off Meeting of the Advisory Group for the OECD Guidelines for Measuring ...
Kick-off Meeting of the Advisory Group for the OECD Guidelines for Measuring ...
 
Project Deliverables PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Project Deliverables PowerPoint Presentation SlidesProject Deliverables PowerPoint Presentation Slides
Project Deliverables PowerPoint Presentation Slides
 
Project Deliverables Powerpoint Presentation Slides
Project Deliverables Powerpoint Presentation SlidesProject Deliverables Powerpoint Presentation Slides
Project Deliverables Powerpoint Presentation Slides
 

Project life cycle definition, proposal, planning, execution, and phase-out

  • 3. Project life cycle Definition Proposal Planning Execution Phase-out Definition Proposal Planning Execution Phase-out Overall personnel effort Definition Proposal Project n Project n+1 Project n+2
  • 4. Contract Project life cycle Definition • Business needs • Deliverables • Project boundaries • Success criteria Proposal • Scope • Milestones • Budget • Risks • Team Planning • Implementation • Training • Integration • Budget • Critical path Execution • Development • Testing • Training • Monitoring • Adjusting Phase-out • Go-live • Turnover to support • Reassign • Improve • Maintenance Charter approved Proposal approved System manual Hand-out approved Plan approved Business Technical Business Needs
  • 5. Starting point  Clearly define objectives and outcomes  Set out the SoA and the progress planned in the proposal  Describe the activities to be performed
  • 6. Example 1 1 48 1.00 MGT 48 2 1 48 11.00 RTD 48 3 4 42 37.00 RTD 39 4 1 48 0.00 RTD 48 5 1 48 10.00 RTD 48 6 7 42 0.00 RTD 36 7 1 48 2.00 RTD 48 8 18 48 3.50 DEM 31 9 1 48 3.00 OTH 48 67.50 100.0% WP Description Start End Effort Dur. Consortium Management Creative Media Experience Metadata Semantics & WF for netw orked spactial media Image & metedata capure & coding Production for spatial media Distribution & display Route to exploitation Demonstration of new technologies & experimental productions Dissemination Nature Project structure Total Relative weight in % Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Effort Effort Effort Effort Effort Weight 1 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 1.00 1.5% 2 2.75 2.75 2.75 2.75 11.00 16.3% 3 8.54 11.38 11.38 5.69 37.00 54.8% 4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 5 2.50 2.50 2.50 2.50 10.00 14.8% 6 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0% 7 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 2.00 3.0% 8 0.00 0.79 1.35 1.35 3.50 5.2% 9 0.75 0.75 0.75 0.75 3.00 4.4% 15.29 18.92 19.49 13.80 67.50 100.0% 22.6% 28.0% 28.9% 20.4% 100.0%Relative weight in % Total Production for spatial media Distribution & display Dissemination Linear yearly workload (MM) Total Metadata Semantics & WF for netw orked spactial media Image & metedata capure & coding WP Description Consortium Management Creative Media Experience Route to exploitation Demonstration of new technologies & experimental productions
  • 7. Planning  Prepare a Work Break Down Structure (WBS)  Assign roles and responsibilities 2008 2009 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 1 48 1.00 48 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 2 1 48 11.00 48 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 3 4 42 37.00 39 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 4 1 48 0.00 48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 1 48 10.00 48 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 6 7 42 0.00 36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 1 48 2.00 48 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 8 18 48 3.50 31 9 1 48 3.00 48 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.56 0.56 0.56 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 0.56 1.13 1.69 3.20 4.71 6.22 7.73 9.24 10.75 12.27 13.78 15.29 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 23% Project Gant Chart WP Description Start End Effort Dur. Consortium Management Creative Media Experience Metadata Semantics & WF for netw orked spactial media Image & metedata capure & coding Production for spatial media Route to exploitation Demonstration of new technologies & experimental productions Distribution & display Dissemination Relative w eight on overall effort (%) 100% Total effort 67.50 Cumulated Effort
  • 8. Example WP Work package title 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 1 Management and quality assurance 1.1 Consortium Management t M1.1 t M1.3 1.1.1 Project Co-ordination 1.1.2 Project Quality Assurance t M1.2 1.1.3 Project Risk Assessment & Management 1.2 Project Administration & quality assurance 2 New approaches to ICT learning, training and education 2.1 Identification of gaps in ICT education/training landscape t M2.1 2.2 Turning identified gaps into educational requirements 2.3 Roadmap for the definition of new ICT training programmes t M2.2 3 Support to Clusters and Grand Coalition 3.1 Identification of best practices in the targeted clusters t M3.2 3.2 Online collaboration and discussion platform t M3.1 3.3 Guidelines for efficient ICT jobs match making t M3.3 4 Exploration of national platforms supporting labour market matching 4.1 Identification of good/bad practices, recommendations 4.2 Provision of a service for labour market matching t M4.1 4.4 Support in creation of new regional/national platforms 5 Impact evaluation 5.1 Pilot actions in each cluster 5.2 Stakeholders acceptance evaluation t M5.1 6 Outreach and sustainability 6.1 Outreach and promotion planning t M6.3 6.2 Sustainability planning t M6.2 6.3 Community building t M6.1 t M6.4 Milestones M1.1Project Inception, M1 M3.3 Initial version of project guidelines release, M12 M1.2 Quality Assurance inception, M2 M4.1Experimental labour market matching light service release, M10 M1.3 Project Closure, M24 M5.1Impact Assessment, M24 M2.1Initial gaps and requirements identification, M8 M6.1Portal availability, M4 M2.2 ICT Education Roadmap release, M24 M6.2 Sustainability strategy delivery, M6 M3.1Collaboration platform release, M6 M6.3 Communication strategy implementation, M12 M3.2 Initial best/bad practices identification, M6 M6.4 Outreach strategy implementation, M24
  • 9. Budgeting  Based on Work Break Down Structure (WBS) and responsibilities estimate personnel effort  Evaluate the effort based on prior experience  Evaluate the number of meetings and travels  Estimate the needed equipment
  • 10. Example 2008 2009 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 1 48 1.00 48 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 0.02 2 1 48 11.00 48 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 3 4 42 37.00 39 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 4 1 48 0.00 48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 1 48 10.00 48 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.21 6 7 42 0.00 36 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7 1 48 2.00 48 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 8 18 48 3.50 31 9 1 48 3.00 48 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.56 0.56 0.56 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 0.56 1.13 1.69 3.20 4.71 6.22 7.73 9.24 10.75 12.27 13.78 15.29 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2008 2009 Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1 Y 0.16 0.05 0.60 0.45 15 Y 0.52 0.30 0.30 0.30 1.00 1.00 28 Y 0.50 0.50 33 Y 0.72 0.67 0.58 0.68 0.50 0.55 0.38 0.16 0.16 0.16 0.80 1.00 0.88 0.67 0.58 0.68 0.50 1.07 0.38 0.51 0.46 0.46 2.90 2.95 0.56 0.56 0.56 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 1.51 -0.32 -0.11 -0.02 0.83 1.01 0.44 1.13 1.00 1.05 1.05 -1.39 -1.44 23% Use (Y/N) ZHU Meng CHOUDRI Said Planned (c) Delta (c - a) Total (a) Project Gant Chart WP Description Start End Effort Dur. Consortium Management Creative Media Experience Metadata Semantics & WF for netw orked spactial media Image & metedata capure & coding Production for spatial media Route to exploitation Demonstration of new technologies & experimental productions Distribution & display Dissemination Project Effort Actual Deployment ID Relative w eight on overall effort (%) 100% Total effort 67.50 Cumulated Effort Effort per Resource BADII Atta FUSCHI David Luigi
  • 11. Budgeting  Estimate consumables  Estimate other relevant costs 2008 M ar Apr M ay Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Y 3,858.17£ 2,792.49£ 2,417.38£ 2,834.17£ 2,083.95£ 3,625.66£ 1,583.80£ 1,703.99£ 1,436.08£ 1,43£ N -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ £ N -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ £ N -£ 123.90£ -£ 322.56£ 95.60£ -£ -£ 235.60£ 625.71£ 35£ N -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ £ N -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ £ N -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ £ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ -£ £ 2,314.90£ 1,749.83£ 1,450.43£ 1,894.04£ 1,307.73£ 2,175.40£ 950.28£ 1,163.75£ 1,237.08£ 1,07£ 6,173.07£ 4,666.22£ 3,867.80£ 5,050.76£ 3,487.27£ 5,801.05£ 2,534.08£ 3,103.34£ 3,298.87£ 2,86£ Use (Y/N) Monthly Expenditures N DirectIn- Other specific Computing Travels Personnel Equipment Overheads Adjustments Total Project Expenditures Consumables Other Audit Subcontracting IPR Protection
  • 12. Example 77% 20% 3% Direct Costs Allocation Personnel Travel Other direct Item Cost Ratio Funding Personnel 716,447.0 76.7% 716,447 Travel 186,000.0 19.9% 186,000 Consumables 2,000.0 0.2% 2,000 Other 10,000.0 1.1% 10,000 Advisory 20,000.0 2.1% 20,000 Total Direct 934,447.0 100.0% 934,447 Indirect (7%) 65,414.0 65,414 Total 999,861.0 999,861 Travel item Cost Qtty Total Flight 200 2 400 Hotel 100 4 400 Subsistence 50 4 200 Total 10 1000
  • 13. Example 01/03/2008 Project Accounting and Operational Currency 29/02/2012 Organisation Standard Operation Currency 48.0 0.7660000 03/03/2008 4.0 Date Estimate Actual 01/03/2008 04/03/2009 0.9093000 0.9093000 29/02/2012 04/03/2010 0.9930000 48.0 04/03/2011 0.9930000 4.0 03/03/2012 0.9930000 N 03/04/2009 (1) if needed and applicable (2) used for future periods . 3 12 Reporting frequency (Months) Financial rep. freq. (Months) Project Short Name Actual dates 2020 3D MEDIA 2020 3D MEDIA Spatial Sound And Vision ICT-FP7-215475 Project Full Name Contract ref. Exchange Rate(1) for estimates(2) H5045300 Project Start Date Exchange Rate(1) for reporting Period 1 Exchange Rate(1) for reporting Period 2 Exchange Rate(1) for reporting Period 3 Exchange Rate(1) for reporting Period 4 Internal Code Planned Start Date Planned End Date Planned Duration (Months) Project End Date Planned Duration (Years) Planned Duration (Years) Reporting frequencies Extended (Y/N) Project References Exchange Rate(1) at project signature / onset EUR GBP Planning dates Accounting summary Exchange rates 60%Project Overhead % 0.9930000 Project Duration (Months)
  • 14. Example Budget in EUR RTD Demo Training Coord. Support Manag. Other Total Personnel 318,460.00 17,220.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,690.63 17,760.63 364,131.88 Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Consumables 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Travel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Computing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other specific costs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 IPR Protection 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-Total 318,460.00 17,220.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 10,690.63 17,760.63 364,131.88 Subcontracting 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Overheads 191,076.00 10,332.38 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,414.38 10,656.38 218,479.13 509,536.00 27,553.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,105.00 28,417.00 582,611.00 382,152.00 13,777.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17,105.00 28,417.00 441,451.00 75% 50% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 76% Total Cost Project Budget Direct Funding Allow ed Funding % In- Budget in EUR Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Total Personnel 82,474.31 102,091.45 105,136.76 74,429.35 364,131.88 Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Consumables 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Travel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Computing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other specific costs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 IPR Protection 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-Total 82,474.31 102,091.45 105,136.76 74,429.35 364,131.88 Subcontracting 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Overheads 49,484.59 61,254.87 63,082.06 44,657.61 218,479.13 131,958.90 163,346.33 168,218.82 119,086.95 582,611.00 99,986.76 123,769.37 127,461.32 90,233.54 441,451.00 23% 28% 29% 20% 100% In-Direct Total Cost Funding Expected yearly load % Budget linear distribution on project time-span
  • 15. Example Costs in EUR Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Total Personnel 48,915.58 11,790.57 0.00 0.00 60,706.15 Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Consumables 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Travel 2,548.39 8,654.99 11,710.74 0.00 22,914.12 Computing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other specific costs 0.00 0.00 37.30 0.00 37.30 IPR Protection 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-Total 51,463.97 20,445.57 11,748.04 0.00 83,657.57 Subcontracting 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Overheads 30,878.38 12,267.34 7,048.82 0.00 50,194.54 82,342.34 32,712.91 18,796.86 0.00 133,852.11Total Cost Actual Project Cost on project time-span (b) DirectIn- Budget in EUR Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Total Personnel 82,474.31 102,091.45 105,136.76 74,429.35 364,131.88 Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Consumables 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Travel 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Computing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other specific costs 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 IPR Protection 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-Total 82,474.31 102,091.45 105,136.76 74,429.35 364,131.88 Subcontracting 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Overheads 49,484.59 61,254.87 63,082.06 44,657.61 218,479.13 131,958.90 163,346.33 168,218.82 119,086.95 582,611.00 In- Total Cost Budgeted Project Cost on project time-span (a) Direct
  • 16. Example Costs in EUR Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Total Personnel 33,558.74 90,300.88 105,136.76 74,429.35 303,425.73 Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Consumables 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Travel -2,548.39 -8,654.99 -11,710.74 0.00 -22,914.12 Computing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other specific costs 0.00 0.00 -37.30 0.00 -37.30 IPR Protection 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-Total 31,010.35 81,645.89 93,388.73 74,429.35 280,474.31 Subcontracting 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Overheads 18,606.21 48,987.53 56,033.24 44,657.61 168,284.58 49,616.56 130,633.42 149,421.96 119,086.95 448,758.89 Delta in respect to planned (a-b) DirectIn- Total Cost Costs in EUR Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Total Personnel 48,915.58 11,790.57 0.00 0.00 60,706.15 Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Consumables 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Travel 2,548.39 8,654.99 11,710.74 0.00 22,914.12 Computing 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other specific costs 0.00 0.00 37.30 0.00 37.30 IPR Protection 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Sub-Total 51,463.97 20,445.57 11,748.04 0.00 83,657.57 Subcontracting 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Overheads 30,878.38 12,267.34 7,048.82 0.00 50,194.54 82,342.34 32,712.91 18,796.86 0.00 133,852.11Total Cost Actual Project Cost on project time-span (b) DirectIn-
  • 17. Sources of Standards  Project Management Institute (PMI)  Association for Project Management (APM)  International Project Management Association (IPMA) OGC ISO 21500
  • 18. Sources of information Project management  http://www.pmi.org/  http://ipma.ch/  http://www.apm.org.uk/ Business  http://www.businessballs.com/