ASSIGNMENT 04 C06I Business Ethics Directions: Be sure to save an electronic copy of your answer before submitting it to Ashworth College for grading. Unless otherwise stated, answer in complete sentences, and be sure to use correct English, spelling and grammar. Sources must be cited in APA format. Your response should be four (4) double-spaced pages; refer to the "Assignment Format" page located on the Course Home page for specific format requirements. Respond to the items below. 1. Define the following: a right, a legal right, a moral right, a human right. How are they related? 2. What three (3) features define a moral right? 3. How do we know that people have rights? What is the basis of the moral rights according to a utilitarian view? According to Immanuel Kant? 4. Fully discuss the idea that human beings have a "natural right" to liberty and a "natural right" to private property, as claimed by John Locke (1632-1704). Grading Rubric Please refer to the rubric on the next page for the grading criteria for this assignment. CATEGORYExemplarySatisfactoryUnsatisfactoryUnacceptable 15 points 12 points 8 points 5 points Student provides a clear, logical definition of a right, a legal right, a moral right, and a human right, including how they are related. Student provides a mostly clear, logical definition of a right, a legal right, a moral right, and a human right, including how they are related. Student provides a weak or unclear definition of a right, a legal right, a moral right, and a human right, including how they are related. Student provides a poor definition of a right, a legal right, a moral right, and a human right, including how they are related. 15 points 12 points 8 points 5 points Student provides a clear, logical description of the three features that define a moral right. Student provides a mostly clear, logicaldescription of the three features that define a moral right. Student provides a weak or unclear description of the three features that define a moral right. Student provides a poor description of the three features that define a moral right. 5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points Student provides a clear, logical discussion of how we know people have rights. Student provides a mostly clear, logical discussion of how we know people have rights. Student provides a weak or unclear discussion of how we know people have rights. Student provides a poor discussion of how we know people have rights. 10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points Student provides a clear, logical discussion of the utilitarian view of moral rights. Student provides a mostly clear, logical discussion of the utilitarian view of moral rights. Student provides a weak or unclear discussion of the utilitarian view of moral rights. Student provides a poor discussion of the utilitarian view of moral rights. 10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points Student provides a clear, logical discussion of the Kan.

1. ASSIGNMENT 04
C06I Business Ethics
Directions: Be sure to save an electronic copy of your answer
before submitting it to Ashworth College for grading. Unless
otherwise stated, answer in complete sentences, and be sure to
use correct English, spelling and grammar. Sources must be
cited in APA format. Your response should be four (4) double-
spaced pages; refer to the "Assignment Format" page located on
the Course Home page for specific format requirements.
Respond to the items below.
1. Define the following: a right, a legal right, a moral right, a
human right. How are they related?
2. What three (3) features define a moral right?
3. How do we know that people have rights? What is the basis
of the moral rights according to a utilitarian view? According to
Immanuel Kant?
4. Fully discuss the idea that human beings have a "natural
right" to liberty and a "natural right" to private property, as
claimed by John Locke (1632-1704).
Grading Rubric
Please refer to the rubric on the next page for the grading
criteria for this assignment.
CATEGORYExemplarySatisfactoryUnsatisfactoryUnacceptable
15 points 12 points 8 points 5 points

2. Student provides a clear,
logical definition of a right, a
legal right, a moral right, and
a human right, including how
they are related.
Student provides a mostly
clear, logical definition of a
right, a legal right, a moral
right, and a human right,
including how they are
related.
Student provides a weak or
unclear definition of a right,
a legal right, a moral right,
and a human right,
including how they are
related.
Student provides a poor
definition of a right, a legal
right, a moral right, and a
human right, including
how they are related.
15 points 12 points 8 points 5 points
Student provides a clear,
logical description of the
three features that define a
moral right.
Student provides a mostly
clear, logicaldescription of
the three features that
define a moral right.
Student provides a weak or
unclear description of the
three features that define a
moral right.
Student provides a poor

3. description of the three
features that define a
moral right.
5 points 4 points 3 points 2 points
Student provides a clear,
logical discussion of how we
know people have rights.
Student provides a mostly
clear, logical discussion of
how we know people have
rights.
Student provides a weak or
unclear discussion of how
we know people have
rights.
Student provides a poor
discussion of how we
know people have rights.
10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points
Student provides a clear,
logical discussion of the
utilitarian view of moral
rights.
Student provides a mostly
clear, logical discussion of
the utilitarian view of moral
rights.
Student provides a weak or
unclear discussion of the
utilitarian view of moral
rights.
Student provides a poor
discussion of the utilitarian
view of moral rights.
10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points
Student provides a clear,

4. logical discussion of the
Kantian view of moral rights.
Student provides a mostly
clear, logical discussion of
the Kantian view of moral
rights.
Student provides a weak or
unclear discussion of the
Kantian view of moral
rights.
Student provides a poor
discussion of the Kantian
view of moral rights.
20 points 15 points 10 points 5 points
Student provides a clear,
logical discussion of natural
rights to liberty and private
property according to John
Locke.
Student provides a mostly
clear, logical discussion of
natural rights to liberty and
private property according
to John Locke.
Student provides a weak or
unclear discussion of
natural rights to liberty and
private property according
to John Locke.
Student provides a poor
discussion of natural rights
to liberty and private
property according to John
Locke.
15 points 12 points 8 points 5 points
Student makes no errors in

5. grammar or spelling that
distract the reader from the
content.
Student makes 1-2 errors in
grammar or spelling that
distract the reader from the
content.
Student makes 3-4 errors in
grammar or spelling that
distract the reader from the
content.
Student makes more than
4 errors in grammar or
spelling that distract the
reader from the content.
10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points
The paper is written in
proper format. All sources
used for quotes and facts are
credible and cited correctly.
The paper is written in
proper format with only 1-2
errors. All sources used for
quotes and facts are credible
and most are cited correctly.
The paper is written in
proper format with only 3-5
errors. Most sources used
for quotes and facts are
credible and cited correctly.
The paper is not written in
proper format. Many
sources used for quotes
and facts are less than
credible (suspect) and/or
are not cited correctly.

6. Moral Right (15
points)
Basis of Moral
Rights - Kantian
View (10 points)
Format (10 Points)
Rights Defined (15
points)
People have Rights
(5 points)
Basis of Moral
Rights - Utilitarian
View (10 points)
Mechanics (15
Points)
Lockean Rights (20
points)
ASSIGNMENT 08
C06I Business Ethics
Directions: Be sure to save an electronic copy of your answer
before submitting it to Ashworth College for grading. Unless
otherwise stated, answer in complete sentences, and be sure to
use correct English, spelling and grammar. Sources must be
cited in APA format. Your response should be four (4) double-
spaced pages; refer to the "Assignment Format" page located on
the Course Home page for specific format requirements.
Respond to the items below.
1. What is traditional utilitarianism? With traditional
utilitarianism, how do you determine what the moral thing to do
on any particular occasion might be? Include mention of the
four (4) considerations to determine what the moral thing to do
on any particular occasion might be.

7. 2. Why is utilitarianism attractive to many? Discuss three (3)
reasons.
3. What is the ecological ethic?
4. How does utilitarianism support the ecological ethic?
Grading Rubric
Please refer to the rubric on the next page for the grading
criteria for this assignment.
CATEGORYExemplarySatisfactoryUnsatisfactoryUnacceptable
10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points
Student provides a clear,
logical description of
traditional utilitarianism.
Student provides a mostly
clear, logical description of
traditional utilitarianism.
Student provides a weak or
unclear description of
traditional utilitarianism.
Student provides a poor
discussion of description
of traditional
utilitarianism.
15 points 12 points 8 points 5 points
Student provides a clear,
logical discussion of how to
determine the moral right
with traditional
utilitarianism, including 4
considerations.

8. Student provides a mostly
clear, logical discussion of
how to determine the moral
right with traditional
utilitarianism, including 4
considerations.
Student provides a weak or
unclear discussion of how
to determine the moral
right with traditional
utilitarianism, including 4
considerations.
Student provides a poor
discussion of how to
determine the moral right
with traditional
utilitarianism, including 4
considerations.
15 points 12 points 8 points 5 points
Student provides a clear,
logical discussion of why
utilitarianism is attractive to
many.
Student provides a mostly
clear, logical discussion of
why utilitarianism is
attractive to many.
Student provides a weak or
unclear discussion of why
utilitarianism is attractive to
many.
Student provides a poor
discussion of why
utilitarianism is attractive
to many.
10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points

9. Student provides a clear,
logical description of the
ecological ethic.
Student provides a mostly
clear, logical description of
the ecological ethic.
Student provides a weak or
unclear description of the
ecological ethic.
Student provides a poor
description of the
ecological ethic.
20 points 15 points 10 points 5 points
Student provides a clear,
logical discussion of how
utilitarianism supports the
ecological ethic.
Student provides a mostly
clear, logical discussion of
how utilitarianism supports
the ecological ethic.
Student provides a weak or
unclear discussion of how
utilitarianism supports the
ecological ethic.
Student provides a poor
discussion of how
utilitarianism supports the
ecological ethic.
20 points 15 points 10 points 5 points
Student makes no errors in
grammar or spelling that
distract the reader from the
content.
Student makes 1-2 errors in
grammar or spelling that

10. distract the reader from the
content.
Student makes 3-4 errors in
grammar or spelling that
distract the reader from the
content.
Student makes more than
4 errors in grammar or
spelling that distract the
reader from the content.
10 points 8 points 5 points 2 points
The paper is written in
proper format. All sources
used for quotes and facts are
credible and cited correctly.
The paper is written in
proper format with only 1-2
errors. All sources used for
quotes and facts are credible
and most are cited correctly.
The paper is written in
proper format with only 3-5
errors. Most sources used
for quotes and facts are
credible and cited correctly.
The paper is not written in
proper format. Many
sources used for quotes
and facts are less than
credible (suspect) and/or
are not cited correctly.
Format (10 Points)
Traditional
Utilitarianism
Defined (10 points)
Utilitarianism

11. Attractive (15
points)
Ecological Ethic (10
points)
Mechanics (20
Points)
Utilitarianism
Supports Ecological
Ethic (20 points)
Traditional
Utilitarianism
Considerations (15
points)