Submit Search
Upload
U201 issues in civil law
•
2 likes
•
1,308 views
Crystal Delosa
Follow
Slideshow view
Report
Share
Slideshow view
Report
Share
1 of 36
Download now
Download to read offline
Recommended
U402 Part B civil procedures and the jury system
U402 Part B civil procedures and the jury system
Crystal Delosa
Adversary System and Jury System
U402 B Engaging in Justice
U402 B Engaging in Justice
Crystal Delosa
Magistrates' court
Magistrates' court
coburgpsych
U402part a theadversarysystem
U402part a theadversarysystem
Crystal Delosa
U402 a court processes and procedures (working progress)
U402 a court processes and procedures (working progress)
Crystal Delosa
2015 u303 the role of the courts in law making1
2015 u303 the role of the courts in law making1
Crystal Delosa
Ao s3thecourtroom
Ao s3thecourtroom
Crystal Delosa
U401 disputeresolutionmethods
U401 disputeresolutionmethods
Crystal Delosa
Recommended
U402 Part B civil procedures and the jury system
U402 Part B civil procedures and the jury system
Crystal Delosa
Adversary System and Jury System
U402 B Engaging in Justice
U402 B Engaging in Justice
Crystal Delosa
Magistrates' court
Magistrates' court
coburgpsych
U402part a theadversarysystem
U402part a theadversarysystem
Crystal Delosa
U402 a court processes and procedures (working progress)
U402 a court processes and procedures (working progress)
Crystal Delosa
2015 u303 the role of the courts in law making1
2015 u303 the role of the courts in law making1
Crystal Delosa
Ao s3thecourtroom
Ao s3thecourtroom
Crystal Delosa
U401 disputeresolutionmethods
U401 disputeresolutionmethods
Crystal Delosa
Although criminal procedure follows many of the patterns of civil procedure, there are major differences between them, largely because of the special provisions of the U.S. Constitution (which are usually echoed in state constitutions). To learn more about Criminal Procedure purchase the text Foundations of Law: Cases, Commentary and Ethics, 6th Edition from Cengage Learning. Paralegal Power Breaks are short information packed sessions that provide useful career information to paralegals at all career levels.
Paralegal Power Break: The law of criminal procedure
Paralegal Power Break: The law of criminal procedure
Paralegal Rainmakers
Year 11 Legal Studies - Term 1
3 The Court System
3 The Court System
paulwhite1983
Legal Studies Unit 3 AoS 2 Part A Summary Slides
U302 part a the victorian civil justice system
U302 part a the victorian civil justice system
Crystal Delosa
Adversarial and inquisitorial_systems_2
Adversarial and inquisitorial_systems_2
G. KRISHNASWAMY
Criminal Trial Process
Criminal Trial Process
Mr Shipp
The role of the courts in law making
The role of the courts in law making
Crystal Delosa
Legal Studies Unit 3 AoS 2 Part B Summary Slides
U302 part b reforming the civil justice system
U302 part b reforming the civil justice system
Crystal Delosa
Sentencing and Punishment
Sentencing and Punishment
Mr Shipp
Criminal Investigation Process
Criminal Investigation Process
Mr Shipp
Nature of Crime
Nature of Crime
Mr Shipp
Law-Exchange.co.uk Powerpoint
Law-Exchange.co.uk Powerpoint
lawexchange.co.uk
AQA AS Level/ A-Level, Law U1. Requires you to know magistrates, this presentation sums up the background, role, selection and appointment, training, criminal jurisdiction, powers and the advantages and disadvantages of magistrates
Magistrates
Magistrates
eleanorrrxo
Year 10 Legal Studies - Term 1
7. The Jury System
7. The Jury System
paulwhite1983
Courts system
Courts system
LegalEyres
Compare and contrast the role and function of judges, lawyers and lay people within the English courts& Evaluate the effectiveness of lay personnel in the English courts
Law Coursework - Unit 1, Task 4
Law Coursework - Unit 1, Task 4
Lee Partington
Plea Bargaining and Selection of Jurors - Presentation by Prajwal Bhattarai It is the most common method of resolving cases in the criminal system during pre-trial process. Plea bargaining has long been central to America’s criminal justice system. The practice of negotiating an agreement between the prosecution and the defense. First of all plea should be request by defendant. Plea should be reasonable and should be voluntary knowing the consequences. Usually it involves sentence reductions, dismissal of other charges, recommendations and so on.
Plea Bargaining and Selection of Jurors - Presentation by Prajwal Bhattarai
Plea Bargaining and Selection of Jurors - Presentation by Prajwal Bhattarai
Prajwal Bhattarai
criminal justice system cont
SWK 579 Week 4. criminal justice system cont
SWK 579 Week 4. criminal justice system cont
TAMUCSocialWork
3.3 legal personnel
3.3 legal personnel
Alisa Stephens
Young Offenders
Young Offenders
Mr Shipp
Legal systems, court structures and expert evidence in the UK and US
Legal Systems and Court Structures
Legal Systems and Court Structures
Michael Bromby
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
lawexchange.co.uk
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
lawexchange.co.uk
More Related Content
What's hot
Although criminal procedure follows many of the patterns of civil procedure, there are major differences between them, largely because of the special provisions of the U.S. Constitution (which are usually echoed in state constitutions). To learn more about Criminal Procedure purchase the text Foundations of Law: Cases, Commentary and Ethics, 6th Edition from Cengage Learning. Paralegal Power Breaks are short information packed sessions that provide useful career information to paralegals at all career levels.
Paralegal Power Break: The law of criminal procedure
Paralegal Power Break: The law of criminal procedure
Paralegal Rainmakers
Year 11 Legal Studies - Term 1
3 The Court System
3 The Court System
paulwhite1983
Legal Studies Unit 3 AoS 2 Part A Summary Slides
U302 part a the victorian civil justice system
U302 part a the victorian civil justice system
Crystal Delosa
Adversarial and inquisitorial_systems_2
Adversarial and inquisitorial_systems_2
G. KRISHNASWAMY
Criminal Trial Process
Criminal Trial Process
Mr Shipp
The role of the courts in law making
The role of the courts in law making
Crystal Delosa
Legal Studies Unit 3 AoS 2 Part B Summary Slides
U302 part b reforming the civil justice system
U302 part b reforming the civil justice system
Crystal Delosa
Sentencing and Punishment
Sentencing and Punishment
Mr Shipp
Criminal Investigation Process
Criminal Investigation Process
Mr Shipp
Nature of Crime
Nature of Crime
Mr Shipp
Law-Exchange.co.uk Powerpoint
Law-Exchange.co.uk Powerpoint
lawexchange.co.uk
AQA AS Level/ A-Level, Law U1. Requires you to know magistrates, this presentation sums up the background, role, selection and appointment, training, criminal jurisdiction, powers and the advantages and disadvantages of magistrates
Magistrates
Magistrates
eleanorrrxo
Year 10 Legal Studies - Term 1
7. The Jury System
7. The Jury System
paulwhite1983
Courts system
Courts system
LegalEyres
Compare and contrast the role and function of judges, lawyers and lay people within the English courts& Evaluate the effectiveness of lay personnel in the English courts
Law Coursework - Unit 1, Task 4
Law Coursework - Unit 1, Task 4
Lee Partington
Plea Bargaining and Selection of Jurors - Presentation by Prajwal Bhattarai It is the most common method of resolving cases in the criminal system during pre-trial process. Plea bargaining has long been central to America’s criminal justice system. The practice of negotiating an agreement between the prosecution and the defense. First of all plea should be request by defendant. Plea should be reasonable and should be voluntary knowing the consequences. Usually it involves sentence reductions, dismissal of other charges, recommendations and so on.
Plea Bargaining and Selection of Jurors - Presentation by Prajwal Bhattarai
Plea Bargaining and Selection of Jurors - Presentation by Prajwal Bhattarai
Prajwal Bhattarai
criminal justice system cont
SWK 579 Week 4. criminal justice system cont
SWK 579 Week 4. criminal justice system cont
TAMUCSocialWork
3.3 legal personnel
3.3 legal personnel
Alisa Stephens
Young Offenders
Young Offenders
Mr Shipp
Legal systems, court structures and expert evidence in the UK and US
Legal Systems and Court Structures
Legal Systems and Court Structures
Michael Bromby
What's hot
(20)
Paralegal Power Break: The law of criminal procedure
Paralegal Power Break: The law of criminal procedure
3 The Court System
3 The Court System
U302 part a the victorian civil justice system
U302 part a the victorian civil justice system
Adversarial and inquisitorial_systems_2
Adversarial and inquisitorial_systems_2
Criminal Trial Process
Criminal Trial Process
The role of the courts in law making
The role of the courts in law making
U302 part b reforming the civil justice system
U302 part b reforming the civil justice system
Sentencing and Punishment
Sentencing and Punishment
Criminal Investigation Process
Criminal Investigation Process
Nature of Crime
Nature of Crime
Law-Exchange.co.uk Powerpoint
Law-Exchange.co.uk Powerpoint
Magistrates
Magistrates
7. The Jury System
7. The Jury System
Courts system
Courts system
Law Coursework - Unit 1, Task 4
Law Coursework - Unit 1, Task 4
Plea Bargaining and Selection of Jurors - Presentation by Prajwal Bhattarai
Plea Bargaining and Selection of Jurors - Presentation by Prajwal Bhattarai
SWK 579 Week 4. criminal justice system cont
SWK 579 Week 4. criminal justice system cont
3.3 legal personnel
3.3 legal personnel
Young Offenders
Young Offenders
Legal Systems and Court Structures
Legal Systems and Court Structures
Similar to U201 issues in civil law
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
lawexchange.co.uk
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
lawexchange.co.uk
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
lawexchange.co.uk
Judicial System
Goal 5 ppt
Goal 5 ppt
jenniferdavis22
NC Goal 5
Goal 5
Goal 5
Mrs. Sharbs
Recent publication about basics of criminal law, and what civil attorneys should keep in mind while trying a civil case.
Criminal Law for Civil Attorneys darren-chaker
Criminal Law for Civil Attorneys darren-chaker
Darren Chaker
Chapter 4 - Updated
Chapter 4 - Updated
Chapter 4 - Updated
glickauf
Year 11 Legal Studies, Criminal Law PowerPoint
11LS Criminal Law
11LS Criminal Law
paulwhite1983
Law and Justice Chapter 5 power point
Chapter 5 power point
Chapter 5 power point
mckenziewood
CHAPTER 5 CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE Nicolai Caymen worked as a desk clerk at a hotel in Ketchikan, Alaska. After a woman called a Ketchikan business supply store and complained that the store had charged her credit card for a laptop computer she did not purchase, the store discovered that Caymen had used a credit card in placing a telephone order for the laptop and that when he picked up the computer, the store clerk had not asked for identification. Store personnel then contacted the Ketchikan police department to report the incident and to pass along information, acquired from other stores, indicating that Caymen may have attempted similar credit card trickery elsewhere. In order to look for the laptop and other evidence of credit card fraud, the police obtained a search warrant for the house where Caymen rented a room. Caymen, who was present while his room was searched, denied the allegation that he had used someone else’s credit card to acquire the laptop. Instead, he stated that he had bought it with his own credit card. During the search, the police found the laptop and a tower computer. It was later determined that Caymen had rented the tower computer from a store but had never made any of the required payments. In Caymen’s wallet, which the police examined in connection with the search of his room, the officers found receipts containing the names and credit card information of guests who had stayed at the hotel where Caymen was employed. The police seized the laptop and contacted the store where Caymen had acquired it to ask whether officers could examine the laptop’s hard drive before they returned the computer to the store. The store’s owner consented. In examining the laptop’s hard drive for evidence of credit card fraud, the police found evidence indicating Caymen’s probable commission of federal crimes unrelated to credit card fraud. The police then temporarily suspended their search of the hard drive and obtained another search warrant because they had probable cause to believe that Caymen had committed federal offenses. Under that search warrant, officers checked the hard drives and storage media from the laptop and tower computers and found further evidence pertaining to the federal crimes. Caymen was prosecuted in state court for credit card fraud and was indicted in federal court for the separate federal offenses. In the federal proceeding, he asked the court to suppress (i.e., rule inadmissible) the evidence obtained by the police in their examinations of the hard drives of the laptop and tower computers. Caymen based his suppression request on this multipart theory: that the police had no valid warrant for their initial look at the laptop’s hard drive; that in the absence of a valid warrant, his consent (rather than the store owner’s) was needed to justify a search of the laptop’s hard drive; that the evidence obtained during the initial examination of the laptop’s hard drive was the result of an unconstitutional searc.
CHAPTER 5 CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE Nicolai Caymen worked as .docx
CHAPTER 5 CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE Nicolai Caymen worked as .docx
robertad6
Dr 2013
Dr 2013
Miss Hart
504 Part II Criminal Procedure # 151053 Cust: Cengage Au: Hall Pg. No. 504 Title: Criminal Law and Procedure Server: __________________ K Short / Normal DESIGN SERVICES OF S4-CARLISLE Publishing Services information or access to their systems for the government to collect data. In others, the government has obtained FISC orders. In recent years third-party authority has been scrutinized in the context of metadata, or non content information. An example of metadata is the government’s collection of phone numbers dialed but not the content of those conversations. In its review of an application for an order to capture a huge amount of “telephony metadata,” FISC ruled in 2013 that such intelligence gathering is analogous to the phone records sought in Smith v. Maryland.37 In that case the Supreme Court held that when an individual dials a phone number he is transmitting the data to a third party, the telephone company, and as a consequence loses his privacy in the number he dialed. For this reason the acquisition of the number dialed, but not the content of the call, does not raise implicate the Fourth Amendment. FISC held that this conclusion is not changed because of the size of the data request.38 The amendments to the FISA mentioned earlier empowered the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to review and approve programs that collect metadata, in addition to individual orders of surveillance. One particularly controversial authority created by the Patriot Act is the National Security Letter. Without subpoena, the government is empowered to demand non- content data from Internet service providers, communication companies, and busi- nesses about their clients. Again, non content data include web sites visited, telephone numbers called, and e-mail addresses. Thousands, in some years tens of thousands, of NSLs have been issued yearly since 9/11. NSLs come with a “gag” order. That is, the recipient of the NSL is ordered, under criminal penalty, to not disclose to anyone, in- cluding the client who is named in the NSL, that the letter has been received. A federal district judge found this and other provisions of the NSL law to be contrary to the First Amendment’s protection of free speech and the Fourth Amendment in 2013.39 FISC is aimed at foreign governments and its agents, abroad. As you can see, the authority of the United States to spy on U.S. persons abroad is limited to when U.S. persons are acting as foreign agents and when engaged in terrorism. If the United States wants to conduct a search within the United States, the Fourth Amendment and Title III rules you have already learned apply, even if the underlying offense is a viola- tion of a national security law. If the government acquires otherwise protected infor- mation during an otherwise legitimate surveillance, the information is to be destroyed unless the contents indicate a threat of serious bodily harm or death to any person. An ex.
504 Part II Criminal Procedure# 151053 Cust Cengage .docx
504 Part II Criminal Procedure# 151053 Cust Cengage .docx
troutmanboris
Chapter 13: Interrogation, Electronic Surveillance, and Other Police Practices 471 # 151053 Cust: Cengage Au: Hall Pg. No. 471 Title: Criminal Law and Procedure Server: __________________ K Short / Normal DESIGN SERVICES OF S4-CARLISLE Publishing Services confessions, and admissions to prove guilt is controversial. The United States Supreme Court has recognized that admissions are highly suspect when relied upon alone to obtain a confession. The Court stated, in Escobedo v. Illinois (1964),4 that a “system of criminal law enforcement which comes to depend on the ‘confession’ will, in the long run, be less reliable and more subject to abuses than a system which depends on extrinsic evidence independently” obtained through other law enforcement practices. At common law, confessions and admissions could be used freely, as long as they were made voluntarily. The early basis for excluding involuntary confessions was the Due Process Clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments.5 Eventually, federal defendants could seek to have confessions suppressed if they were not taken before a mag- istrate promptly after arrest. This was known as the McNabb-Mallory rule, named for two Supreme Court cases.6 The rule was not constitutionally based. Instead, the Court announced the rule in its supervisory role over the nation’s federal courts. While the rule of quick presentment of arrestees to judges had existed at common law and had been codified by Congress, there was no remedy for violations. Accordingly, the Court held that confessions that occurred after unreasonable delays should be excluded. Congress re- acted to McNabb-Mallory and Miranda by enacting a statute that permits the admission of a confession so long as it was voluntarily given. Another section provides that regardless of any delay in presenting a suspect to a judge, a confession shall be admitted if obtained within 6 hours of arrest. In Corley v. United States, 556 U.S.—(2009) it was held that if there is a delay in presenting a suspect to a judge longer than 6 hours, the old McNabb- Mallory exclusionary rule applies if a delay is found to be unreasonable. Today, interrogations, confessions, and admissions are governed by these rules, as well as two broader rights: the Fifth Amendment right to be free from self-incrimina- tion and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel. Miranda By virtue of popular television and films, the Supreme Court case Miranda v. Arizona, or at least the “Miranda” warnings that are a product of that case, is one of the best known judicial decisions of our time. [The Supreme Court consolidated appeals from several individuals who had been convicted at trials where their confessions were entered into evidence. Ernesto Miranda, for whom the case is named, was arrested for rape and kidnapping. He was interrogated at a police station. He was not advised of his constitutional rights, he never requested to see .
Chapter 13 Interrogation, Electronic Surveillance, and Other .docx
Chapter 13 Interrogation, Electronic Surveillance, and Other .docx
bartholomeocoombs
Ch11
Ch11
icebergslim1996
Crime and criminal law ,what is crime, surce of criminal law. limitation of criminal law
Crime and criminal law
Crime and criminal law
Md.Rezaul Hoque Razu
Teaching notes for Voluntary Manslaughter (DR) 2014 AS Law G153 OCR
Diminished Responsibility
Diminished Responsibility
Miss Hart
Deferred prosecution agreements
Deferred prosecution agreements
Amanda Bin
The director of the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) and the Solicitor General, Edward Garnier QC, have recently made no secret of the fact that they consider the criminal justice system to be incapable of dealing with corporate prosecutions in a way that refects commercial realities
Deferred prosecution agreements
Deferred prosecution agreements
David Blixter
fdf
Intddddddddd-to-Criminal-Law-Slides.pptx
Intddddddddd-to-Criminal-Law-Slides.pptx
AshadulHoqueJahin1
9789865994167
法律倫理專論(一版) 大學用書系列一品
法律倫理專論(一版) 大學用書系列一品
TAAZE 讀冊生活
Similar to U201 issues in civil law
(20)
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Law-Exchange.co.uk Shared Resource
Goal 5 ppt
Goal 5 ppt
Goal 5
Goal 5
Criminal Law for Civil Attorneys darren-chaker
Criminal Law for Civil Attorneys darren-chaker
Chapter 4 - Updated
Chapter 4 - Updated
11LS Criminal Law
11LS Criminal Law
Chapter 5 power point
Chapter 5 power point
CHAPTER 5 CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE Nicolai Caymen worked as .docx
CHAPTER 5 CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE Nicolai Caymen worked as .docx
Dr 2013
Dr 2013
504 Part II Criminal Procedure# 151053 Cust Cengage .docx
504 Part II Criminal Procedure# 151053 Cust Cengage .docx
Chapter 13 Interrogation, Electronic Surveillance, and Other .docx
Chapter 13 Interrogation, Electronic Surveillance, and Other .docx
Ch11
Ch11
Crime and criminal law
Crime and criminal law
Diminished Responsibility
Diminished Responsibility
Deferred prosecution agreements
Deferred prosecution agreements
Deferred prosecution agreements
Deferred prosecution agreements
Intddddddddd-to-Criminal-Law-Slides.pptx
Intddddddddd-to-Criminal-Law-Slides.pptx
法律倫理專論(一版) 大學用書系列一品
法律倫理專論(一版) 大學用書系列一品
More from Crystal Delosa
Legal Studies Unit 3 AoS 1 Part B Summary Slides
U301 part b reforming the victorian criminal justice system
U301 part b reforming the victorian criminal justice system
Crystal Delosa
Legal Studies Unit 3 AoS 1 Part A Summary Slides
U301 part a the victorian criminal justice system
U301 part a the victorian criminal justice system
Crystal Delosa
2015 u401 dispute resolution bodies and methods
2015 u401 dispute resolution bodies and methods
Crystal Delosa
Peo law & goverance
Peo law & goverance
Crystal Delosa
2015 u302 b protection of rights
2015 u302 b protection of rights
Crystal Delosa
2015 u302 part a the constitution
2015 u302 part a the constitution
Crystal Delosa
U301 part b changing the law working progress
U301 part b changing the law working progress
Crystal Delosa
U301 part a australian parliament system
U301 part a australian parliament system
Crystal Delosa
Structure and function of parliament
Structure and function of parliament
Crystal Delosa
Legal 3 4 introduction
Legal 3 4 introduction
Crystal Delosa
Protection of rights
Protection of rights
Crystal Delosa
Legal revision slides aos 2
Legal revision slides aos 2
Crystal Delosa
Legal revision slides aos 2
Legal revision slides aos 2
Crystal Delosa
(Lesson 9 2013) split brain studies
(Lesson 9 2013) split brain studies
Crystal Delosa
Need for laws*
Need for laws*
Crystal Delosa
Rules vslaws
Rules vslaws
Crystal Delosa
U3 ao s 2 memory revision 2013
U3 ao s 2 memory revision 2013
Crystal Delosa
U3 ao s 1 revision psychology 2013 (1)
U3 ao s 1 revision psychology 2013 (1)
Crystal Delosa
Mental healthrevision2013
Mental healthrevision2013
Crystal Delosa
Learning revision2013
Learning revision2013
Crystal Delosa
More from Crystal Delosa
(20)
U301 part b reforming the victorian criminal justice system
U301 part b reforming the victorian criminal justice system
U301 part a the victorian criminal justice system
U301 part a the victorian criminal justice system
2015 u401 dispute resolution bodies and methods
2015 u401 dispute resolution bodies and methods
Peo law & goverance
Peo law & goverance
2015 u302 b protection of rights
2015 u302 b protection of rights
2015 u302 part a the constitution
2015 u302 part a the constitution
U301 part b changing the law working progress
U301 part b changing the law working progress
U301 part a australian parliament system
U301 part a australian parliament system
Structure and function of parliament
Structure and function of parliament
Legal 3 4 introduction
Legal 3 4 introduction
Protection of rights
Protection of rights
Legal revision slides aos 2
Legal revision slides aos 2
Legal revision slides aos 2
Legal revision slides aos 2
(Lesson 9 2013) split brain studies
(Lesson 9 2013) split brain studies
Need for laws*
Need for laws*
Rules vslaws
Rules vslaws
U3 ao s 2 memory revision 2013
U3 ao s 2 memory revision 2013
U3 ao s 1 revision psychology 2013 (1)
U3 ao s 1 revision psychology 2013 (1)
Mental healthrevision2013
Mental healthrevision2013
Learning revision2013
Learning revision2013
U201 issues in civil law
1.
Unit 2 Civil
Law Outcome 1: Issues in Civil Law Chapter 5: Civil Law
2.
Outcome
3.
Key knowledge
4.
Intro to civil
law
5.
Key Players in
Civil Disputes
6.
The need for
civil law
7.
Key principles of
civil law
8.
Distinction between civil and
criminal law
9.
Relationship between civil and
criminal law
10.
Law-making through the courts
11.
Precedent
12.
Precedent in Action
13.
Binding precedent
14.
Stare Decisis –
Stand by what has been decided
15.
Obiter dictum –
said by the way
16.
Persuasive precedent
17.
Flexibility in precedent “Don’t
Ride On Drugs”
18.
Distinguishing
19.
Reversing
20.
Overruling
21.
Disapproving
22.
Statutory Interpretation
23.
Torts – a
civil wrong
24.
Negligence Torts
25.
Negligence: Key principles All
four MUST be proved for it to be a negligence case
26.
Negligence: Defences
27.
Defamation Torts
28.
Defamation: Key principles All
three MUST be proved for it to be a defamation case
29.
Defamation: Defences
30.
Defamation: Defences
31.
Defamation: Defences
32.
Defamation: Defences
33.
Defamation on the
Internet
34.
Other torts
35.
End of U201
36.
References
Download now