1. Is it arrogant to draw self portraits?
1) Not generally, yet "even in the 19th century, the arrogant artist was a ripe source of humor".
Source and also more information:
http://www.galeriedada.com/page-46.html!.?.!Further details:
http://www.culture24.org.uk/art/painting+%2526+drawing/portraits/art38630!.?.!http://www.guardi
an.co.uk/culture/2006/jun/27/1!.?.!2)"The self-portrait can be a quite efficient kind of advertising and
marketing for an artist, especially of course for a portrait painter. D rer was not truly interested in
portraits commercially, but made great use of his extraordinary self-portraits to advertise himself as
an artist, something he was extremely advanced in doing. Rembrandt made his living principally
from portrait-painting during his most successful duration, and like Van Dyck and Joshua Reynolds,
numerous of his pictures were absolutely meant to market his abilities. With the arrival of normal
Academy shows, several artists tried to produce remarkable self-portraits to make a perception on
the imaginative stage. A current exhibition at the National Gallery, London, Rebels and also Martyrs,
did not shrink from the comic bathos that often resulted. An example from the 21st century is
Arnaud Prinstet, an or else little-known contemporary artist which has actually generated good
quantities of promotion by undertaking to paint his self portrait every day. On the other hand, some
artists shown themselves significantly as they did other clients."http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-portrait