Euthanasia Essay

Arguments For And Against Euthanasia Essay
Euthanasia is the practice of ending an individual's life in order to relieve them from an incurable
disease or unbearable suffering. The term euthanasia is derived from the Greek word for "good
death" and originally referred to as "intentional killing" ( Patelarou, Vardavas, Fioraki, Alegakis,
Dafermou, & Ntzilepi, 2009). Euthanasia is a controversial topic which has raised a great deal of
debate globally. Although euthanasia has received great exposure in the professional media, there
are some sticky points that lack clarity and need to be addressed. Euthanasia is a divisive topic, and
different interpretations of its meaning, depend on whether the person supports it or not. While a
few societies have accepted euthanasia, there are...show more content...
The patient voluntarily wanted to end his life because he was suffering from Lou Gehrigs's disease
(Siu, 2008). Since then, the controversy over active euthanasia has remained an ethical dilemma for
healthcare providers, patients and their family members in America and the rest of the world. The
general public's belief is that, health–care providers have professional obligations to save the lives of
their patients regardless of their health status. The majority of the public feels that, healthcare
workers' involvement in the euthanasia practice is a betrayal of the "do no harm" oath. When a
healthcare worker is involved in either active or passive euthanasia, it can be viewed as a
disregard to this value. However, the proponents for euthanasia claim that a physician turning down
a suffering patient's request to end their life is also a violation to the "do no harm" oath (Siu,
2008). The right to die falls under patient's autonomy and the basic question is whether individuals
should be allowed to end their lives if they choose to do so (Sanders & Chaloner 2007). Those in
the healthcare sector grapple with this notion on a daily bases because they have to practice under
the codes of ethics guidelines. Nurses and doctors should be cautious in their practice as they balance
the patient's autonomy and their professional ethics and guidelines. Sanders & Chaloner (2007)
pointed out that nurses and doctors know that a patient's autonomy
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Does euthanasia assists patients to die with dignity?
From fresh to dying, is the humanity multiplies the development natural law. Along with medicine
progress and life enhancement, the people besides pay attention to eugenics, simultaneous starts to
pay attention to the euthanasia. Since this century 50 ages, regarding euthanasia, many countries'
medical arenas, educational world, and ethical groups have been arguing about the euthanasia
argument for many years, although many person of ideas have certain changed along with the time.
However, the traditional thought that the public opinion has huge influence on the average person.
In people's traditional ethics and morality, doctor's inherent responsibilities are to save impending
death and the wounded. However, it is difficult for many people to accept the fact that doctors help
the patients to implement lethal injection. Meanwhile traditional ethics, morality and kernel, love,
filial piety, righteousness, also requests the people to respect the life, to deeply love their life.
Euthanasia that is to take patients finish life immediately, which conflicts with the traditional ethics
and morality in representation. Therefore, to let people accept euthanasia will be difficult,
especially to let his own relatives die by euthanasia, to leave quickly, probably to be more difficult.
In the view of people's cognition deviation of euthanasia, this article based on the ethics elementary
theory to explain that euthanasia is to

Euthanasia Essay
Here is another essay for you to use! It's alittle screwed up, but perhaps you can do something
with it. It was a lot worse than this, it had strange marks all over it and the paragraphs were
everywhere. I fixed it a bit, but I would go crazy if I stared at a computer screen any more!!!!
Euthanasia, is one of the most controversial issues of our time.
This diver issue raises many questions such as: how should decisions be made, and by whom? What
should be determined as a matter of law and what left a matter of discretion and judgment? Should
those who want to die, or who are in a "persistent vegetative state" be allowed to die
voluntarily? Who should decide: the patient, the physician, the courts, or the families? The...show
more content...
"Wickett, The Right To Die (Harper & Row, Publishers,1986) p. 109. Paul D. Simmons
declares bluntly that "it is harder morally to justify letting somebody die a slow and ugly
death, dehumanized, than it is to justify helping him to escape from such misery.
Samuel Gorovitz, Drawing The Line: Life, Death, and Ethical Choices in an American Hospital
(Oxford University Press, 1991) p.113.В® Some very prominent people are making packs with
friends or relatives that specify that either will help the other die when life becomes desperate
from pain or tragic accident. Families and physicians feel a variety of powerful emotions when
dealing with a patient dying a slow and agonizing death. Certainly they wish that the pain were
relieved and that health restored; that the patient not die but go on living and sharing concerns and
joys together. "When the illness is terminal and there is no hope of relief or recovery,
however, death is often desired for the patient as God's appointed way to relieve suffering."
Paul D.
Simmons, Birth and Death: Bioethical Decision Making (The Westminster Press, 1986) p.116. Mr.
Sorestad, my junior high teacher, shared his experience at the death of his beloved wife after her
prolonged battle with breast cancer. She had deteriorated physically and mentally practically beyond

Euthanasia Essay : ' Euthanasia '
Keanne Zhang
Instructor: Joel Tomfohr
LA 202
Sep 29rd, 2014
Euthanasia
I have born in Guangzhou, China, and spent long period of time living and studying in Hong
Kong. Hong Kong impressed me the most is that people living there are embodying the spirit of
freedom, and they can always stand out to fight for their right and freedom. I am a talkative
person, and I can tell others what I am thinking very accurately. I am passionate of communicate
with different people because this is a way to get to know more things about the world with fun.
They tell me about their jobs, places that they have traveled, and delicious food they have eaten.
Hearing their stories can make me feel like I have experienced what they did too. Therefore, I can
never imagine how it would be like if I am not able to receive any message or communicate with
people anymore. What brings me more sorrow is that when watching drama which includes scene
that describe the main character unfortunately got into a car crash, and she end up live her whole
life in vegetative state. I could not imagine if this situation happens to me, how much pain I would
bring to my family, and how do I live my live. Later, I realized that this has been a social issue for
long when I see a real case.
When I was in seventh grade, I had my best friend Kenny. He lives next to me and we studied at
the same school. We always play in each other house before dinnertime. Life was happy and easy
every day. Until, one day, I feel something

Ethics of Euthanasia Essay
As patients come closer to the end of their lives, certain organs stop performing as well as they use
to. People are unable to do simple tasks like putting on clothes, going to the restroom without
assistance, eat on our own, and sometimes even breathe without the help of a machine. Needing to
depend on someone for everything suddenly brings feelings of helplessness much like an infant
feels. It is easy to see why some patients with terminal illnesses would seek any type of relief from
this hardship, even if that relief is suicide. Euthanasia or assisted suicide is where a physician would
give a patient an aid in dying. "Assisted suicide is a controversial medical and ethical issue based on
the question of whether, in certain situations,...show more content...
Whether murder is done in a peaceful, non painful way or in a very gruesome, unimaginable way,
it is still considered murder. Physicians have no way of knowing 'what is best for the patient'
especially if that patient's terminal illness prevents them from speaking. Not only is assisted
suicide considered murder, it also goes against Physicians' Hippocratic Oath. "Hippocratic Oath:
An oath (or promise) all physicians must swear to uphold, regarding the ethical practices of the
medical profession" (Lee). By allowing doctors to stray from this oath, it will be easier for them to
aid in or carry out assisted suicides when it will never be entirely necessary for them to consider the
option. "In 2005, Texas doctors removed two patients from life support without advanced directions
and against the wishes of the patient's family" (Pawlick). By not legalizing assisted suicides, families
will be able to decide when their family member is physically unable to continue with the provided
treatments, but only when the patient themselves can no longer communicate their wishes and no
document stating how they should go about the situation has been left in their families possession.
Ethical issues are not the only problem. Some argue that euthanasia also creates issues from a legal
perspective. "One legal question is whether assisted suicide violates the Controlled Substances Act, a
federal law governing the distribution of drugs" (Lee). Such

Euthanasia Essay : Euthanasia And Euthanasia
This is why Euthanasia is important and summarizing the research that I found on Euthanasia.
Euthanasia is important because there is a lot of arguments about Euthanasia. Some people support it
and some people do not support Euthanasia (Euthanasia and assisted suicide– Arguments).
Euthanasia allows people to be free from physical pain. It is the hastening of death of a patient to
prevent further sufferings (Euthanasia Revisited). The religious argument states God chooses when
human life ends. Euthanasia also causes mental suffering because they are in physical pain or they
are experiencing with terminal illness. It is a debatable issue. There are many different opinions on
Euthanasia. The topic that I am researching is Euthanasia. There are many different arguments for
and against Euthanasia. The four main types of arguments used by people who are against
Euthanasia are the religious argument, the 'slippery slope' argument, the medical ethics argument,
and the alternative argument (Euthanasia and assisted suicide–Argument. The pragmatic argument
and the ethical argument are the two main types of arguments used to support the practice of
Euthanasia and assisted suicide (Euthanasia and assisted suicide– Argument. The ethical argument is
that people should have the freedom of choice to say if they want euthanasia or not. The pragmatic
argument is for euthanasia. . In addition, that is the definition of the topic. This is what makes the
topic interesting. What makes this topic

Essay on The Pros and Cons of Euthanasia
Euthanasia, good or bad? In this following article I will be exploring euthanasia in more detail, the
different Christian points of view, the strengths and weaknesses of the euthanasia argument and
finally my point of view on euthanasia and why I believe this.
First of all, what is euthanasia? It is something that not many people think about until they or a friend
or family member is put in a position where they might actually have to consider it. Euthanasia, in
the dictionary, simply is: the action of ending someone's life in a painless way. It seems pretty
simple but in reality it is a lot more complicated, not only for the people involved but for the society
in general as well.
Overall there are four different types of...show more content...
One of the most important pieces of scripture a Christian follows is the 10 commandments and one,
and in my opinion the most important, commandment is "Do not commit murder." (Exodus 20:13)
This raises the question, is euthanasia murder? and in many Christian's view is that if a life is taken
away earlier than God planed then it is murder and therefore many Christian's point of view on
euthanasia is that it is wrong.
Another quotation that supports what I believe is the general view of many Christians around the
world is the idea that God has already planned out our life and knows when the right time to die is.
This is shown in the bible saying "He set the time for birth, and the time for death." (Ecclesiastes 3:2)
and again here: "your days allotted to me, had all been recorded in your book, before any of them
began." (Psalm 139:16)
Both these quotations show, according to the bible, that God has already planned out our life–from
the time that we are born to the time of our death.
The last Christian point of view is also shown through the bible saying "You created every part of
me, you put me together in my mother's womb." (Psalms 139:13)
This quotation is saying that God created everything about us and not only is linked with the point
of view above saying that God has already planned out our lives but is also linked with the idea that
God created us and chose when we were born so he should

Essay on Moral and Ethical Issues of Euthanasia
Moral and Ethical Issues of Euthanasia
As we all know, medical treatment can help save lives. But is there a medical treatment that would
actually help end life? Although it's often debated upon, the procedure is still used to help the aid of
a patient's death. Usually dubbed as mercy killing, euthanasia is the "practice of ending a life so as to
release an individual from an incurable disease or intolerable suffering" (Encarta). My argument over
this topic is that euthanasia should have strict criteria over the use of it. There are different cases of
euthanasia that should be looked at and different point of views that should be considered. I will be
looking into VE (Voluntary Euthanasia), which involves a request by the dying...show more content...
In the past, a person is considered dead if the signs of pulse or breathing is absent. But in the 1960s,
advance life–supporting technologies have re–defined the meaning of death. The invention of the
mechanical ventilator or respirator and the heart–lung machine allowed physicians to revive or
artificially maintain function in hearts and lung. This made bigger chances for the survival of
patients. Then later in the 1980s, brain activity is added to the criteria of death. The brain acts as
the center headquarters of all functioning parts of the body. The brain sends impulses through the
nerve to muscles and organs. The brain also controls memory and the ability for a person to learn
and react to his or her environment. The brain is divided into different parts for different functions.
The front part of the brain is called the Cerebrum, which is referred to as the "higher brain." This
part of the brain controls the memory and thinking abilities of a person. The brainstem, composed of
the midbrain, the pons, and the medulla oblangata is called the "lower brain" because "it controls
spontaneous and vegetative functions such as swallowing, yawning and sleep–wake cycles"
(President's Commission).
Since respiration and circulation can be restored, therefore defining brain death or the loss of brain
function is a "certification of death" (Encarta). The higher brain is considered to be the most
important part in determining the death of a person

Euthanasia Essay
The applied ethical issue of euthanasia, or mercy killing, concerns whether it is morally
permissible for a third party, such as a physician, to end the life of a terminally ill patient who is in
intense pain. The word euthanasia comes from the Greek words eu ('well') and thanatos ('death'). It
means a painless and gentle death. But in modern usage, it has come to imply that someone's life is
ended for compassionate reasons by some passive or active steps taken by another person. The
euthanasia controversy is part of a larger issue concerning the right to die. Staunch defenders of
personal liberty argue that all of us are morally entitled to end our lives when we see fit. Thus,
according to these people, euthanasia is in principle morally...show more content...
If the person is in a coma situation and unable to make the decision for himself/herself, then it
should be a decision for the family and doctors together to make.
There are several arguments in favor of the moral permissibility of euthanasia. The most persuasive
argument is mercy. People who argue mercy state that it is cruel and inhumane to refuse the plea of a
terminally ill patient who wishes their life to be mercifully ended. They also argue that the suffering
of terminal patients is not just physical pain, which is bad enough, but it also involves helplessness,
stress, exhaustion, terror and loss. Another argument is respect for the person's autonomy. People
who are pro euthanasia feel that a person's autonomy should be respected to the extent that no one
else is harmed. So, since a terminally ill patient undergoing euthanasia harms no one else, that
person's autonomy and decision should be respected. It is also argued that the golden rule supports
active euthanasia insofar as we would want others to put us out of our misery if we were in such a
situation. A more formal version of this argument is based on Kant's categorical imperative
("act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a
universal law"). (Horan 1980) The

Essay on Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia
Assisted suicide brings a debate that involves professional, legal and ethical issues about the value
of the liberty versus the value of life. However, before conceive an opinion about this topic is
necessary know deeply its concept. Assisted suicide is known as the act of ending with the life of a
terminal illness patients for end with their insupportable pain. Unlike euthanasia, the decision is not
made by the doctor and their families, but by the patient. Therefore, doctors should be able to assist
the suicide of their patients without being accused of committing a criminal offense. This
conception is supported by three points of view. The first point defenses the autonomy of people,
which covers the right of people to make decision...show more content...
In conclusion, assisted suicide is supported by the right of people to make decision about their life
provided the patient is in the right mental state to do it.
Another reason to legalize assisted suicide is the empathy for our fellow. For some people who
suffer chronic pain or terminal illnesses, suicide is a more ethical and respectable solution than
suffer great pain until the day of their death, whereby people should have the obligation to relieve
their suffering and respect their dignity. Even if take a life should be considered immoral, let
patients suffer during the remaining time of life, with no hope of a better future or alleviating the
pain will end is inhumane. People judge assisted suicide according to how much pain and suffering
patient are suffering. However, there are differences between pain and suffering. While pain is an
objective concept that can be measured, suffering is a subjective idea that cannot be measured
(Ezekiel, 1999). The impossibility to measure the level of suffering open another question of how to
know if assisted suicide is justified when only the patient know his grade of suffering. In this
instance, the weight relapses in the patient decision again. Allowing assisted suicide society is
preventing future terrible experiences that will convert the last days of patient life in torture. Studies
of

Euthanasia Essay : Euthanasia Of Humans
Hemingway App makes your writing bold and clear.
Since June 2016, euthanasia of humans is legal in the Netherlands, Belgium, Colombia, and
Luxembourg and Medical Assistance in Dying is legal in Switzerland, Germany, Japan, Canada, and
in the US states of Washington, Oregon, Colorado, Vermont, Montana, Washington DC, and
California. In Canada a bill was passed on June 17, 2016, to activate regulated assisted dying. This
means suicide of a person afflicted by an incurable disease, using a lethal dose of drugs provided by
a doctor. To be eligible medical suicide you must meet all of the conditions. There are different
types of Assisted Suicide and many regulations on the matter to ensure no life is taken for no reason.
Bill C–14 has helped...show more content...
Laws are set to match each province 's/country 's laws that give a legal reassurance for a doctor to
take a life so there aren 't any lawsuits on the hospital. To be granted medical assistance in a
physician will evaluate according to the categories below so it suits the laws we currently have in
order. The individual must: 1)Be a Canadian resident or be qualified for Canadian publicly funded
health services. Since the consolation for prescribing and the procedure are insured the Physicians
do not charge the patient but are advised to refer to the OHIP Schedule of Benefits for further
information. 2)Be over the age of 17 and mentally capable to make decisions on their own wellbeing.
3) The patient must be able to comprehend the consequences of a decision.
4)Have a severely painful and irreversible medical condition. (this includes illnesses, diseases or
disabilities)
5)The possibility of the natural death of the patient must be somewhat ascertainable. While also
being made as to the specific length of time that the individual has to live.
6)Make an autonomous and deliberate request for medical assistance in dying. No outside influence
can be enmeshed with the patient 's thoughts. 7)Provide knowledgeable consent and understanding
towards the process medical assistance in dying.
The rules set are very straightforward and understandable it does not break any human right
violations.

Euthanasia Essay examples
Euthanasia is often called "mercy killing". It is intentionally making someone die, rather than
allowing that person to die naturally. It is sometimes the act of ending someone's life, who is
terminally ill, or is suffering in severe pain. Euthanasia is mostly illegal in the world today.
Euthanasia can be considered a form of suicide, if the person afflicted with the problem actively
does it. The person volunteering to commit the act to that person can also consider it a form of
murder.
The positive side of Euthanasia is that it ends a person's suffering in this world. Many physicians and
psychiatrists believe that it may a humane act. From a virtue ethics point of view, it may be
appropriate. What we seek in human existence is to be...show more content...
The benefits are numerous in that the person euthanized would cease suffering, and the families
would begin the healing process from grief and/or depression from the situation.
From Mill's perspective, the person volunteering for euthanasia has a liberty to do what he/she
wants. Mill has written that if the person does not cause harm to others, it is the person's right, or
liberty, to do what they please. If a person wants euthanasia, then that person has the sole liberties to
choose such an act, and depart society and life. Nobody is being other than the person wishing it,
and it is a volunteered act.
Brandt argues for approval of euthanasia, but killing human beings is wrong, because it injures that
person and goes against the preferences of self–preservation. However, Brandt says that the above is
not present in the issue of euthanasia, so it may be permissible. Brandt says that not all killing is
injury, so not all killing is wrong. One should pay attention to one's expressed wishes he says.
Euthanasia could be considered doing a person a favor, because you cannot injure something if you
are relieving it of pain.
The negative side of euthanasia is that it goes against natural law ethics, because we do not let
nature take its course. We are disturbing what is occurring or happening naturally to the person.
Every person has a natural inclination to continue living. It is also said

Euthanasia is Good: An Opinion Essay
Euthanasia is Good Euthanasia is good for people who think of it as a dignified end of life (Goel
224). People who have an incurable disease and which causes them intolerable pain (maybe more
than death does) or who have a severe devastating handicap which incapacitates them so much
that their oxygen intake becomes difficult, life seems no good for such dejected people and
therefore, their life is not worth living. Thus, active euthanasia is the only sparkling solution that
justifies the end of their life in a peaceful manner (Perri). Euthanasia is good for the person who is
a mature adult because a minor is not smart enough to decide about how long he/she should live.
However, mature people think they are so their exact age depends on them; thanks to Euthanasia!
Euthanasia is also good for people who are hopeless with their lives and do not have the courage
to fight the dejection and physical and emotional agony. Therefore, it is good for them to give up
and choose the final exit as the curing option. After all, a person is responsible for his life so it is
no good to stop him from deciding about how and when he/she should die. In simple words,
Euthanasia is a good way to suicide as one tells others beforehand about it and the amazing thing is
that this plan of exit does not engage the assistants in criminal liability or leave them with feelings
of guiltiness (Perri). Taking the life of a person on his own will also clearly eliminates the chances
of the consequent

Euthanasia Essay
Euthanasia – Response to Anti Euthanasia Essay
Euthanasia is a topic that provokes as much controversy as capital punishment, primarily because it
is irreversible. The question of euthanasia being right or wrong is one that most would prefer left
alone. However, recent publicity on changes to existing laws has ignited considerable discussion and
has forced open the door to a much wider audience. The issues related to direct euthanasia have
raised many questions in my mind, to which I am still searching for answers. I believe it is
necessary to consider arguments, both, for and against, in order to come to any conclusion. In this
paper I will address Brian Clowes' article in the "Pro–Life Activist's Encyclopedia",
located on the...show more content...
Yet, his persistent use of medical cases where patients were classified as irreversibly comatose
and where all decisions regarding their continual treatment were made by others, neglects to
recognize the numerous cases of terminally ill patients, who simply ask for the right to control
their own destiny and to die with dignity. His use of extreme cases, all of which were found in
'National Right to Life News', gives the reader a distorted picture and neglects the many types of
cases where the prolonging of life would be cruel, inhumane and immoral. (Johnstone, 1994:353)
EUTHANASIA SETS A BAD EXAMPLE? I would ask what kind of example are we giving our
young by prolonging life at whatever cost to the person? Is quantity of life always the best option? Is
the taking of human life always wrong? In the 18th century William Mitford, an English historian
stated "Men fear death, as if unquestionably the greatess evil, and yet no man knows that it
may not be the greatest good." (Bradley, Daniels & Jones, 1969:194) Here the author
compares the act of suicide among the young with the act of euthanasia with the terminally ill. He
believes, in making euthanasia an acceptable social practice, it will inevitably have negative
repercussions on the rest of society. The writer argues that by condoning euthanasia, we condone

Euthanasia Essay
Euthanasia Euthanasia, specifically voluntary euthanasia has been a taboo subject for many decades
in this, and other countries. Euthanasia, as defined by the Oxford English Dictionary – bringing
about of this, especially in the case of incurable and painful disease– comes from the Greek word
euthanatos, meaning – a gentle and easy death. It is commonly known as death with dignity given to
those who want the choice to die. No one can prevent death. The can only prolong it. Many people
solicit their physicians to aid in the quick and easy death. Doctors, aware of ethics of their chosen
profession, and consequences of their actions, especially malpractice suits, often refuse the request
(www.euthanasia.org/ve.html). Involuntary...show more content...
A Living Will is a signed document by a person, giving advanced notice have life–saving procedures
withheld or discontinued at the time of serious illness or injury should that person not be able to
make decisions. It has been argued that Living Wills can be deceptive and vague to the signer,
leaving them open to many abuses. Trying to prevent medical treatment measures at the end of their
lives may inadvertently cause their own starvation and dehydration. They are also unnecessary at
times. People already have the right to make informed consent. Doctors already have the right to
withhold treatment deemed as useless. Living Wills should be used when patients are unable to
make the decision for themselves. The strategy used by groups such as Concern for Dying, the
Society for the Right to Die, and the Hemlock Society is to condition public acceptance of assisted
suicide, mercy killing, and legalized euthanasia (www.pregnantpause.org/euth/soundgoo.htm).
With growing international support, doctors are accepting patient's requests for active voluntary
euthanasia (www.euthanasia.org/ve.html). The American Medical Association (AMA) is well
known for their pro–abortion campaigns and funding. Ironically, the AMA funds many hospices and
other palliative care centers. They have a firm stand on life. The AMA has initiated the Institute for
Ethics, designed to educated physicians on alternative medical approaches to euthanasia during

Euthanasia Essay example
Euthanasia, also known as mercy killing is a practice of ending a life to release an individual from
an incurable disease or intolerable suffering. Euthanasia has been accepted both legally and morally
in various forms in many societies but not in all. "In ancient Greece and Rome it was permissible in
some situations to help others die. For example, the Greek writer Plutarch mentioned that in Sparta
infanticide was practiced on children who lacked "health and vigor." Both Socrates and
Plato sanctioned forms of euthanasia in certain cases. Voluntary euthanasiafor the elderly was an
approved custom in several ancient societies." With the rise of organized religion, euthanasia became
morally and ethically abhorrent. Christianity,...show more content...
Derek first founded the Hemlock Society in 1980 after the tragic death of his wife Jean. Jean had
bone cancer and suffered a lot of pain and eventually took her own life with Dereks help.
There are also some organizations that feel euthanasia should be illegal. One such organization is the
I.A.E.T.F. which stands for the International Anti–Euthanasia Task Force. The I.A.E.T.F. is an
information center for many different groups, one such group is Hospice. Hospice is a program
designed to assist patients and families at the end of life. "Hospice care is to provide
symptom–directed, supportive care and to address the physical, emotional, social, and spiritual
needs of the patients, families and caregivers" of terminally ill individuals. Basically hospice doesn't
believe in any form of euthanasia. The focus of Hospice is pain management. If you can manage the
pain through medications it is thought by this group that you don't have to take your life.
Currently, there is only one state where euthanasia is legal this state is Oregon. New York currently
believes that euthanasia should be illegal, but has set up pain management programs. There are two
main documents in New York that help the dying patient gain a sense of control ever the end of
their life these are the do not resuscitate (DNR) and the health care proxy. The do not resuscitate or
DNR form states simply that when respirations and

Euthanasia Essay
Intentionally making someone die, rather than allowing that person to die naturally is the definition
of euthanasia according to the International Anti–Euthanasia Task Force (Euthanasia: Answer to
Frequently Asked Questions, 1). This definition, itself, does not sound very appealing. The practice
of euthanasia in any shape or form should never be legalized in the United States and should be
banned wherever it is presently legal. Whether it be the assisted suicides associated with
"Doctor Death", Jack Kevorkian, or just simply taking away a patient's life support from
them, no form of euthanasia should be administered. The administration techniques, the
consequences if it were legal, and whether it is right or if it is wrong, are...show more content...
This sounds exaggerated, but it really could happen. Amidst the advancement of medical science,
euthanasia has started to be practiced in some developed countries. For instance, the Dutch practice
euthanasia legally and regularly. Now fifteen percent of all deaths in that country are from the
practice of euthanasia alone (Euthanasia: Answer to Frequently Asked Questions, 4). People should
be scared people and put this argument over euthanasia in perspective.
Euthanasia is debated all the time on whether it is right or wrong. Some say it is a right that a
human has and others say it is a sin and is morally wrong. Who knows the right answer?
Euthanasia seems to be contradictory to the doctor's code of ethics, which is to preserve life. It is
believed that doctors should take the patients away from suffering and extend the life of patients.
Also, scientists can easily prove a person living, but they cannot easily prove a person dying.
Because miracles can happen at any time and any place, life should be prolonged as long as
possible. Therefore, so long as a patient has a chance to live, a doctor should make every effort to
cure him.
There are many negative views associated with euthanasia. It is definitely wrong according to The

Euthanasia Ends Suffering Essay examples
Euthanasia Ends Suffering
Death is deeply personal, generally feared, and wholly inescapable, but medical technology now
can prolong our biological existence virtually indefinitely, and, with these advances, comes the
question of whether we should pursue the extension of life in all cases. Most people would agree
that, under certain circumstances, it would be preferable to cease our hold on life. Nearly everyone
can agree that there are situations when terminally ill patients have the right to call for a halt to
life–extending treatments, and that their physicians will have the moral obligation to comply. What
appears to be quite difficult for us as a society to come to terms with is the thought that someone
would...show more content...
Perry was kept alive long enough for his critical injuries to heal, allowing him to recover the
ability to breath unassisted once weaned off a respirator. This means that he will continue to live, if
one can call his existence living, for years to come. Perry's mother, who refused the suggestion of
"letting him die" while her son was comatose, acknowledges that he would not have wanted to live
in his present condition. She refused the suggestion of letting him die while he was comatose, by her
own admission, because she could not accept the guilt she felt at the thought of his slow death from
starvation (which is the commonly accepted, and legally permissible, form of passive euthanasia).
Had the more humane option of active euthanasia been available, she would have chosen that path
for her son. When one sees Perry, one has to ask in whose best interest was it that he was saved?
What possible good can be said to have been achieved in prolonging the existence of someone who
can no longer even realize what the word "life" means? Our society needs to examine the reason
why one type of euthanasia is condoned where another form, often less brutal, is refused. Certain
clarifications are necessary before discussion can begin on whether there truly is a moral difference

Euthanasia Essay : The Euthanasia
Once you have made your decision or even if you are in the process of making the decision you
may be curious about the euthanasia process and what to expect. The euthanasia can take place in
the privacy of your own home or you may choose to have it done at your veterinarian's office. Your
veterinarian may offer at home euthanasia or you may be able to locate a veterinary service that does
at home euthanasia such as Home To Heaven. This is a personal choice and should be made with
you and your pet's comfort in mind. Additionally, you may want to decide if you wish to be
present during the euthanasia. Some owners choose not to be present during the euthanasia as they
don't want that to be their last memory of their pet while others wish to be present so their pet sees
a familiar face before they pass. This is a completely personal choice with no right or wrong answer.
Euthanasia Procedure
The euthanasia process itself can vary by clinic but typically it begins by the signing of the
appropriate paperwork. At this time the technician or doctor may ask you about the care of the
pet's remains after the procedure. Some owners chose to take their pet home to be buried while
other want their pet cremated. If you chose to have your pet cremated you may then choose
between a group cremation (where you will not receive your pet's ashes back) or individual
cremation (where your pet's ashes will be returned to you in a box or urn of your choosing. Your
veterinarian will call

Thesis Statement On Euthanasia
ROOTS MILLENIUM SCHOOLS
Euthanasia: Interfering with life and death?
Amal Sikandar Ranjha
Table of Contents
1.Introduction.................................................................... 3
2.Thesis............................................................................... 4
3.Types of euthanasia....................................................... 4
4.Literature........................................................................ 5
5.Conclusion....................................................................... 7
6.Acknowledgements........................................................ 7 Introduction
From cloning to genetically modified food to designer babies, humans have long been known to
interfere with the way nature does things; humans have been modifying genes and improving the
outlook in the pretext that it improves the quality of our lives. Humans also have a long history of
interfering with and trying to control the more divine...show more content...
The prevalent human ethics have made this topic enormous and highly controversial to its core.
People around the globe have opposing views as to what Euthanasia is, and whether it should be
allowed or should the practitioners of euthanasia be punished. The National Health Service in the
UK has declared it illegal to help someone take their life whatever the circumstances may be.
The one name that comes up most frequently when talking about Euthanasia is Dr. Jack Kevorkian,
also sometimes referred to as Dr. Death. He made it his mission to travel across the United States
of America, at his own expense, to help the people who considered that their lives were not worth
living anymore and assist them in committing suicide. Most of the times, due to extensive suffering,
most patients simply give up; with no hope left, they start to believe that the only way out of
interminable pain and discomfort is to give up on their lives. Utter hopelessness makes them highly
vulnerable and at the same time impulsive too. So, they easily fall victim to the temptation of ending
up their own lives with just little assistance from people like Dr.

Euthanasia Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Cheap Paper Writing Services

More from Cheap Paper Writing Services (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Euthanasia Essay