SlideShare a Scribd company logo
​ ​PERFORMANCE​ ​RUBRIC 
 
Team​ ​Name: ​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​Project​ ​Name:​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​Class: 
 
 
CRITERIA  4  3  2  1  TOTAL 
 
VOICE 
Voice​ ​was​ ​loud 
and​ ​clear;​ ​words 
were​ ​easily 
understood 
Student​ ​spoke​ ​clearly 
but​ ​it​ ​was​ ​difficult​ ​to 
understand​ ​some​ ​of 
the​ ​script;​ ​could’ve 
been​ ​louder. 
Voice​ ​and​ ​language 
was​ ​not​ ​very​ ​clear; 
could’ve​ ​been 
much​ ​louder. 
Could​ ​not 
understand​ ​what 
was​ ​being​ ​said​ ​due 
to​ ​unclear​ ​and​ ​low 
speech. 
 
 
AUDIENCE 
 
 
Audience​ ​felt 
like​ ​part​ ​of​ ​the 
show. 
 
Was​ ​aware​ ​and 
well-connected​ ​to​ ​the 
audience. 
Needed​ ​more 
audience 
awareness​ ​and 
connection. 
 
No​ ​audience 
awareness​ ​or 
connection​ ​at​ ​all. 
 
 
BLOCKING 
 
Good​ ​use​ ​of 
stage​ ​and 
movement—did 
not​ ​turn​ ​back​ ​to 
audience 
Almost​ ​used​ ​entire 
stage—turned​ ​away 
from​ ​audience​ ​only 
once​ ​or​ ​twice.  
Could​ ​have​ ​used 
more​ ​of​ ​the​ ​stage; 
must​ ​concentrate 
on​ ​facing​ ​forward. 
Needed​ ​more 
blocking—always 
face​ ​audience​ ​and 
use​ ​the​ ​stage! 
 
SCRIPT/ 
PURPOSE 
(When​ ​applicable) 
Enticing​ ​vivid 
detail​ ​used​ ​in 
script/dialogue; 
evident​ ​reasons​ ​for 
the​ ​performance. 
Script/dialogue​ ​was 
well-written; 
considerable​ ​detail 
with​ ​good​ ​purpose. 
Some​ ​detail​ ​used​ ​in 
script/dialogue; 
needed​ ​more​ ​of​ ​a 
purpose. 
Script/dialogue 
contained​ ​no 
purpose​ ​and​ ​very 
little​ ​detail. 
 
 
MEMORIZATION/ 
IMPROVISATION 
(When​ ​applicable) 
Script​ ​was​ ​fully 
memorized; 
student 
improvised​ ​in 
place​ ​of​ ​lines. 
Script​ ​was​ ​almost 
fully 
memorized-some 
improv​ ​used​ ​to​ ​make 
up​ ​for​ ​missed​ ​lines. 
Script​ ​was​ ​partially 
memorized; 
student​ ​did​ ​not 
attempt 
improvisation. 
Script​ ​was​ ​not​ ​at​ ​all 
memorized;​ ​no 
improvisation 
used. 
 
FACIAL 
EXPRESSION/ 
BODY​ ​LANGUAGE 
Great​ ​use​ ​of 
gestures,​ ​facial 
expression​ ​and 
body​ ​movement! 
Contained​ ​some​ ​facial 
expression,​ ​gestures 
&​ ​body​ ​movement. 
Needed​ ​more​ ​facial 
expressions 
gestures​ ​& 
movement. 
Contained​ ​little​ ​to 
no​ ​facial 
expression,​ ​gesture 
or​ ​movement. 
 
 
OVERALL 
Committed, 
cooperated​ ​& 
concentrated- 
WOW! 
 
Semi-committed, 
concentrated​ ​& 
cooperative- 
GREAT! 
Almost​ ​committed, 
cooperative​ ​& 
concentrated- 
NOT​ ​TOO 
BAD… 
No​ ​commitment, 
cooperation​ ​or 
concentration 
MORE 
REHEARSAL! 
 
 
 
Final​ ​Grade   
 
Additional​ ​Comments:   
 
 
 
 
 

More Related Content

More from Eguzkitza LHHI

5.1.3. INDICATORS OF SUCCESS
5.1.3. INDICATORS OF SUCCESS5.1.3. INDICATORS OF SUCCESS
5.1.3. INDICATORS OF SUCCESS
Eguzkitza LHHI
 
5.1.4. ICT RUBRIC
5.1.4. ICT RUBRIC5.1.4. ICT RUBRIC
5.1.4. ICT RUBRIC
Eguzkitza LHHI
 
5.1.1. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ASSESMENT
5.1.1. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ASSESMENT5.1.1. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ASSESMENT
5.1.1. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ASSESMENT
Eguzkitza LHHI
 
4.3.2. PROJECT SELF EVALUATION
4.3.2. PROJECT SELF EVALUATION4.3.2. PROJECT SELF EVALUATION
4.3.2. PROJECT SELF EVALUATION
Eguzkitza LHHI
 
4.3.1. DESIGN THINKING CONTENTS
4.3.1. DESIGN THINKING CONTENTS4.3.1. DESIGN THINKING CONTENTS
4.3.1. DESIGN THINKING CONTENTS
Eguzkitza LHHI
 
4.2.3. BUILD A QUESTION GUIDE
4.2.3. BUILD A QUESTION GUIDE4.2.3. BUILD A QUESTION GUIDE
4.2.3. BUILD A QUESTION GUIDE
Eguzkitza LHHI
 
4.2.2.3. PLAN INTERACTIONS and LOGISTICS
4.2.2.3. PLAN INTERACTIONS and LOGISTICS4.2.2.3. PLAN INTERACTIONS and LOGISTICS
4.2.2.3. PLAN INTERACTIONS and LOGISTICS
Eguzkitza LHHI
 
4.2.2.1. FEEDBACK REPORT
4.2.2.1. FEEDBACK REPORT4.2.2.1. FEEDBACK REPORT
4.2.2.1. FEEDBACK REPORT
Eguzkitza LHHI
 
4.1.8.2. WRITE A QUESTIONNAIRE
4.1.8.2. WRITE A QUESTIONNAIRE4.1.8.2. WRITE A QUESTIONNAIRE
4.1.8.2. WRITE A QUESTIONNAIRE
Eguzkitza LHHI
 
4.1.3. DIAGRAM
4.1.3. DIAGRAM4.1.3. DIAGRAM
4.1.3. DIAGRAM
Eguzkitza LHHI
 
4.1.2. STORYBOARD
4.1.2. STORYBOARD4.1.2. STORYBOARD
4.1.2. STORYBOARD
Eguzkitza LHHI
 
4.1.2. STORYBOARD
4.1.2. STORYBOARD4.1.2. STORYBOARD
4.1.2. STORYBOARD
Eguzkitza LHHI
 
4.1.2. STORYBOARD
4.1.2. STORYBOARD4.1.2. STORYBOARD
4.1.2. STORYBOARD
Eguzkitza LHHI
 
1.6. T- SHIRT
1.6. T- SHIRT1.6. T- SHIRT
1.6. T- SHIRT
Eguzkitza LHHI
 
1.6. LOGO EXPLANATION
1.6. LOGO EXPLANATION1.6. LOGO EXPLANATION
1.6. LOGO EXPLANATION
Eguzkitza LHHI
 
2.2. CRETATE A PROJECT PLAN
2.2. CRETATE A PROJECT PLAN2.2. CRETATE A PROJECT PLAN
2.2. CRETATE A PROJECT PLAN
Eguzkitza LHHI
 
2.3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.3.  PROJECT DESCRIPTION2.3.  PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Eguzkitza LHHI
 
2.3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.3.  PROJECT DESCRIPTION2.3.  PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Eguzkitza LHHI
 
2.2. FRAME
2.2. FRAME2.2. FRAME
2.2. FRAME
Eguzkitza LHHI
 
2.2. FRAME
2.2. FRAME 2.2. FRAME
2.2. FRAME
Eguzkitza LHHI
 

More from Eguzkitza LHHI (20)

5.1.3. INDICATORS OF SUCCESS
5.1.3. INDICATORS OF SUCCESS5.1.3. INDICATORS OF SUCCESS
5.1.3. INDICATORS OF SUCCESS
 
5.1.4. ICT RUBRIC
5.1.4. ICT RUBRIC5.1.4. ICT RUBRIC
5.1.4. ICT RUBRIC
 
5.1.1. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ASSESMENT
5.1.1. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ASSESMENT5.1.1. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ASSESMENT
5.1.1. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ASSESMENT
 
4.3.2. PROJECT SELF EVALUATION
4.3.2. PROJECT SELF EVALUATION4.3.2. PROJECT SELF EVALUATION
4.3.2. PROJECT SELF EVALUATION
 
4.3.1. DESIGN THINKING CONTENTS
4.3.1. DESIGN THINKING CONTENTS4.3.1. DESIGN THINKING CONTENTS
4.3.1. DESIGN THINKING CONTENTS
 
4.2.3. BUILD A QUESTION GUIDE
4.2.3. BUILD A QUESTION GUIDE4.2.3. BUILD A QUESTION GUIDE
4.2.3. BUILD A QUESTION GUIDE
 
4.2.2.3. PLAN INTERACTIONS and LOGISTICS
4.2.2.3. PLAN INTERACTIONS and LOGISTICS4.2.2.3. PLAN INTERACTIONS and LOGISTICS
4.2.2.3. PLAN INTERACTIONS and LOGISTICS
 
4.2.2.1. FEEDBACK REPORT
4.2.2.1. FEEDBACK REPORT4.2.2.1. FEEDBACK REPORT
4.2.2.1. FEEDBACK REPORT
 
4.1.8.2. WRITE A QUESTIONNAIRE
4.1.8.2. WRITE A QUESTIONNAIRE4.1.8.2. WRITE A QUESTIONNAIRE
4.1.8.2. WRITE A QUESTIONNAIRE
 
4.1.3. DIAGRAM
4.1.3. DIAGRAM4.1.3. DIAGRAM
4.1.3. DIAGRAM
 
4.1.2. STORYBOARD
4.1.2. STORYBOARD4.1.2. STORYBOARD
4.1.2. STORYBOARD
 
4.1.2. STORYBOARD
4.1.2. STORYBOARD4.1.2. STORYBOARD
4.1.2. STORYBOARD
 
4.1.2. STORYBOARD
4.1.2. STORYBOARD4.1.2. STORYBOARD
4.1.2. STORYBOARD
 
1.6. T- SHIRT
1.6. T- SHIRT1.6. T- SHIRT
1.6. T- SHIRT
 
1.6. LOGO EXPLANATION
1.6. LOGO EXPLANATION1.6. LOGO EXPLANATION
1.6. LOGO EXPLANATION
 
2.2. CRETATE A PROJECT PLAN
2.2. CRETATE A PROJECT PLAN2.2. CRETATE A PROJECT PLAN
2.2. CRETATE A PROJECT PLAN
 
2.3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.3.  PROJECT DESCRIPTION2.3.  PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
 
2.3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.3.  PROJECT DESCRIPTION2.3.  PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
 
2.2. FRAME
2.2. FRAME2.2. FRAME
2.2. FRAME
 
2.2. FRAME
2.2. FRAME 2.2. FRAME
2.2. FRAME
 

5.1.6. ORAL PRESENTATION SCORING RUBRIC

  • 1. ​ ​PERFORMANCE​ ​RUBRIC    Team​ ​Name: ​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​Project​ ​Name:​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​​ ​Class:      CRITERIA  4  3  2  1  TOTAL    VOICE  Voice​ ​was​ ​loud  and​ ​clear;​ ​words  were​ ​easily  understood  Student​ ​spoke​ ​clearly  but​ ​it​ ​was​ ​difficult​ ​to  understand​ ​some​ ​of  the​ ​script;​ ​could’ve  been​ ​louder.  Voice​ ​and​ ​language  was​ ​not​ ​very​ ​clear;  could’ve​ ​been  much​ ​louder.  Could​ ​not  understand​ ​what  was​ ​being​ ​said​ ​due  to​ ​unclear​ ​and​ ​low  speech.      AUDIENCE      Audience​ ​felt  like​ ​part​ ​of​ ​the  show.    Was​ ​aware​ ​and  well-connected​ ​to​ ​the  audience.  Needed​ ​more  audience  awareness​ ​and  connection.    No​ ​audience  awareness​ ​or  connection​ ​at​ ​all.      BLOCKING    Good​ ​use​ ​of  stage​ ​and  movement—did  not​ ​turn​ ​back​ ​to  audience  Almost​ ​used​ ​entire  stage—turned​ ​away  from​ ​audience​ ​only  once​ ​or​ ​twice.   Could​ ​have​ ​used  more​ ​of​ ​the​ ​stage;  must​ ​concentrate  on​ ​facing​ ​forward.  Needed​ ​more  blocking—always  face​ ​audience​ ​and  use​ ​the​ ​stage!    SCRIPT/  PURPOSE  (When​ ​applicable)  Enticing​ ​vivid  detail​ ​used​ ​in  script/dialogue;  evident​ ​reasons​ ​for  the​ ​performance.  Script/dialogue​ ​was  well-written;  considerable​ ​detail  with​ ​good​ ​purpose.  Some​ ​detail​ ​used​ ​in  script/dialogue;  needed​ ​more​ ​of​ ​a  purpose.  Script/dialogue  contained​ ​no  purpose​ ​and​ ​very  little​ ​detail.      MEMORIZATION/  IMPROVISATION  (When​ ​applicable)  Script​ ​was​ ​fully  memorized;  student  improvised​ ​in  place​ ​of​ ​lines.  Script​ ​was​ ​almost  fully  memorized-some  improv​ ​used​ ​to​ ​make  up​ ​for​ ​missed​ ​lines.  Script​ ​was​ ​partially  memorized;  student​ ​did​ ​not  attempt  improvisation.  Script​ ​was​ ​not​ ​at​ ​all  memorized;​ ​no  improvisation  used.    FACIAL  EXPRESSION/  BODY​ ​LANGUAGE  Great​ ​use​ ​of  gestures,​ ​facial  expression​ ​and  body​ ​movement!  Contained​ ​some​ ​facial  expression,​ ​gestures  &​ ​body​ ​movement.  Needed​ ​more​ ​facial  expressions  gestures​ ​&  movement.  Contained​ ​little​ ​to  no​ ​facial  expression,​ ​gesture  or​ ​movement.      OVERALL  Committed,  cooperated​ ​&  concentrated-  WOW!    Semi-committed,  concentrated​ ​&  cooperative-  GREAT!  Almost​ ​committed,  cooperative​ ​&  concentrated-  NOT​ ​TOO  BAD…  No​ ​commitment,  cooperation​ ​or  concentration  MORE  REHEARSAL!        Final​ ​Grade      Additional​ ​Comments: