SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 5
Download to read offline
Case Study
                                                      Current PAT Services Client
Scenario

• For several years PAT Services provided the PAT physician to the hospital as an
  independent contractor but had no other involvement.

• Hospital had previously contracted with an outside service to handle PAT billing.

• Eventually the hospital began billing for the service but did not recover cost.

• PAT Services was asked to review PAT practice performance and made multiple
  suggestions regarding improving results.

• PAT Services was asked to manage physician & provide billing services


Notes

1)   Current PAT practice payor mix used
2)   Estimated patients are annualized from current PAT volumes
3)   Reimbursement Rates for Medicare based upon 2009 Ohio Fee Schedule to create accurate comparison
4)   Reimbursement Rates for Medicaid based upon 2009 Ohio Medicaid Fee Schedule to create accurate comparison
5)   Used Ohio Medicaid rates for self-pay rates
6)   Place of Service = Outpatient Hospital
Base Assumptions               Outpatient Hospital Visits

Total Annual PAT Exams:             2,580                   10 @ 258 Days per year

Annual Ambulatory Exams:            3,870                   15 @ 258 Days per year

Total Department Cases:             6,450
       % Examined                     80%                   * 20% were examined by other fill-in physicians that billed for their own services

Actual # of Examinations / Cases    5,160

Avg Cases per month                  430

Avg PAT Cases per Day                 8.0

Avg Ambulatory Cases per Day         12.0

Avg Total Patients per Day           20.0
New Patients                                            Established Patients                    Projected Annual
                                                                                                                                                              Collection

                                      Before    After      Before    After     Before   After     Before   After      Before    After    Before   After    Before     After


Description      Payor   Encounters   99201     99202      99202     99203     99203    99204     99211    99212      99212     99213    99213    99214
                 Mix

Commercial                             24.41     46.89      46.89     71.10    71.10    118.68    22.89    24.06       43.38    46.42    67.80    71.90
Rates

Commercial        30%      1,548      $26,453   $39,925    $10,889   $27,514        -   $18,372   $1,772   $1,862     $6,715    $2,156        -   $2,226   $45,828    $92,054
Reimbursement

Medicaid                               21.81     48.03      36.05     68.82    53.48     70.32    13.43    24.75       24.75    40.38    40.38    61.24
Rates

Medicaid          4%           206    $3,151     $5,452    $1,116    $3,551         -   $1,451     $139     $255       $511      $250         -    $253     $4,917    $11,213
Reimbursement

Medicare                               23.25     44.66      44.66     67.71    67.71    113.03    21.80    22.91       41.31    44.21    64.57    68.48
Rates

Medicare          58%      2,993      $48,708   $73,512    $20,049   $50,661        -   $33,828   $3,262   $3,428     $12,363   $3,969        -   $4,099   $84,382    $169,497
Reimbursement

Self Pay Rates                         16.36     36.02      27.04     51.62    40.11     52.74    10.07    18.56       18.56    30.29    30.29    45.93


Self Pay          8%           413    $4,727     $8,179    $1,674    $5,327         -   $2,177     $208     $383       $766      $375         -    $379     $7,375    $16,820
Collections

Other             0%             -     58.33     58.33      94.76     94.76    131.27   131.27    29.16    29.16       47.49    47.49    67.48    67.48




Total            100%    5,160        $83,039   $127,068   $33,728   $87,052        -   $55,828   $5,380   $5,929     $20,355   $6,750        -   $6,957   $142,502   $289,584




        % of Care Assumption           70%      55%        15%       25%       0%       10%       5%       5%         10%       3%       0%       2%
300,000
                                              Before
280,000                                       After

260,000

240,000

220,000

200,000

180,000

160,000

140,000

120,000

100,000

 80,000

 60,000

 40,000

 20,000

     0
           Commercial        Medicaid        Medicare     Self Pay Collections   Total
          Reimbursement   Reimbursement   Reimbursement
Conclusion

• PAT Services previously provided physician to client hospital as an independent contractor
  but had no other involvement

• Hospital previously contracted with an outside service to handle PAT billing & eventually began handling
  billing internally but could not recover cost

• PAT Services was asked to review PAT practice performance and made multiple suggestions
  regarding improving results

• PAT Services was asked to manage physician & provide billing service.

• Upon engaging in management of PAT department the same physician was retrained in E & M code
  selection & correct documentation by PAT services experts.

• PAT Services initated quarterly internal chart audits with results communicated back to physician

• PAT Service increased annual collections by more than 100% for client hospital from $142,502 to $289,584,
  which in turn transitioned the hospital’s PAT department from a cost center to a revenue generating center

More Related Content

Viewers also liked (11)

Qualifying Exam Presentation
Qualifying Exam PresentationQualifying Exam Presentation
Qualifying Exam Presentation
 
Ling 539 Rp Test
Ling 539 Rp TestLing 539 Rp Test
Ling 539 Rp Test
 
Direct Marketing of Specialty Crops by Producers
Direct Marketing of Specialty Crops by ProducersDirect Marketing of Specialty Crops by Producers
Direct Marketing of Specialty Crops by Producers
 
Women&Mozilla
Women&MozillaWomen&Mozilla
Women&Mozilla
 
WoMoz - FOSDEM 2012 (part 1)
WoMoz - FOSDEM 2012 (part 1)WoMoz - FOSDEM 2012 (part 1)
WoMoz - FOSDEM 2012 (part 1)
 
WoMoz FOSDEM_2012 (Part 2)
WoMoz FOSDEM_2012 (Part 2)WoMoz FOSDEM_2012 (Part 2)
WoMoz FOSDEM_2012 (Part 2)
 
Women & Mozilla: what's been done & what's to come
Women & Mozilla: what's been done & what's to comeWomen & Mozilla: what's been done & what's to come
Women & Mozilla: what's been done & what's to come
 
Fosdem2011
Fosdem2011Fosdem2011
Fosdem2011
 
Womoz FOSDEM 2010
Womoz FOSDEM 2010Womoz FOSDEM 2010
Womoz FOSDEM 2010
 
Cisco Systems Case Study: The Architecture Review Process Improving the IT P...
Cisco Systems Case Study: The Architecture Review  Process Improving the IT P...Cisco Systems Case Study: The Architecture Review  Process Improving the IT P...
Cisco Systems Case Study: The Architecture Review Process Improving the IT P...
 
Expatriate management HRM
Expatriate management HRM Expatriate management HRM
Expatriate management HRM
 

Similar to Pat Services Case Study

Serious Cost Containment Without Cost Shifting to Employees Webinar
Serious Cost Containment Without Cost Shifting to Employees WebinarSerious Cost Containment Without Cost Shifting to Employees Webinar
Serious Cost Containment Without Cost Shifting to Employees WebinarJ.P. Farley Corporation
 
Mgsi -medical billing Company presentation
Mgsi -medical billing Company presentationMgsi -medical billing Company presentation
Mgsi -medical billing Company presentationecare India
 
Show Me the Money
Show Me the MoneyShow Me the Money
Show Me the Moneyg1marketing
 
Introduction to the Beneplan Co-operative
Introduction to the Beneplan Co-operativeIntroduction to the Beneplan Co-operative
Introduction to the Beneplan Co-operativeBeneplan
 
Medical Practice Business Consulting Presentation
Medical Practice Business Consulting PresentationMedical Practice Business Consulting Presentation
Medical Practice Business Consulting Presentationjohncoxford
 
Percy Power Point
Percy Power PointPercy Power Point
Percy Power PointPercy Lowe
 
Vera Bradley Final Presentation
Vera Bradley Final PresentationVera Bradley Final Presentation
Vera Bradley Final PresentationBashayer Baljon
 
The Power of KPIs
The Power of KPIsThe Power of KPIs
The Power of KPIsPatti Peets
 
RR - Technicals 1.pdf
RR - Technicals 1.pdfRR - Technicals 1.pdf
RR - Technicals 1.pdfmerag76668
 
Onetouch Medical Billing Presentation
Onetouch Medical Billing PresentationOnetouch Medical Billing Presentation
Onetouch Medical Billing PresentationMohanArora6
 
healthcare design_2011_downes_deininger_111110
healthcare design_2011_downes_deininger_111110healthcare design_2011_downes_deininger_111110
healthcare design_2011_downes_deininger_1111102dplanning
 
Nick kwas portfolio
Nick kwas portfolioNick kwas portfolio
Nick kwas portfoliokwasiborskin
 
BU121 StudentToGo New Venture
BU121 StudentToGo New VentureBU121 StudentToGo New Venture
BU121 StudentToGo New Venturephileverson
 
University Faculty Senate Presentaiton: Overview of Contributions Report Marc...
University Faculty Senate Presentaiton: Overview of Contributions Report Marc...University Faculty Senate Presentaiton: Overview of Contributions Report Marc...
University Faculty Senate Presentaiton: Overview of Contributions Report Marc...Larry Catá Backer
 
MACE Compensation and Operation Survey Insights
MACE Compensation and Operation Survey InsightsMACE Compensation and Operation Survey Insights
MACE Compensation and Operation Survey InsightsDowell Management
 

Similar to Pat Services Case Study (20)

Serious Cost Containment Without Cost Shifting to Employees Webinar
Serious Cost Containment Without Cost Shifting to Employees WebinarSerious Cost Containment Without Cost Shifting to Employees Webinar
Serious Cost Containment Without Cost Shifting to Employees Webinar
 
Mgsi -medical billing Company presentation
Mgsi -medical billing Company presentationMgsi -medical billing Company presentation
Mgsi -medical billing Company presentation
 
Show Me the Money
Show Me the MoneyShow Me the Money
Show Me the Money
 
Introduction to the Beneplan Co-operative
Introduction to the Beneplan Co-operativeIntroduction to the Beneplan Co-operative
Introduction to the Beneplan Co-operative
 
Medical Practice Business Consulting Presentation
Medical Practice Business Consulting PresentationMedical Practice Business Consulting Presentation
Medical Practice Business Consulting Presentation
 
Presentation
PresentationPresentation
Presentation
 
Percy Power Point
Percy Power PointPercy Power Point
Percy Power Point
 
Propensity models with logistic regression clarity
Propensity models with logistic regression clarityPropensity models with logistic regression clarity
Propensity models with logistic regression clarity
 
Vera Bradley Final Presentation
Vera Bradley Final PresentationVera Bradley Final Presentation
Vera Bradley Final Presentation
 
The Power of KPIs
The Power of KPIsThe Power of KPIs
The Power of KPIs
 
Federal Health Reform 2013
Federal Health Reform 2013Federal Health Reform 2013
Federal Health Reform 2013
 
Anexo 1
Anexo 1Anexo 1
Anexo 1
 
RR - Technicals 1.pdf
RR - Technicals 1.pdfRR - Technicals 1.pdf
RR - Technicals 1.pdf
 
Onetouch Medical Billing Presentation
Onetouch Medical Billing PresentationOnetouch Medical Billing Presentation
Onetouch Medical Billing Presentation
 
healthcare design_2011_downes_deininger_111110
healthcare design_2011_downes_deininger_111110healthcare design_2011_downes_deininger_111110
healthcare design_2011_downes_deininger_111110
 
Nick kwas portfolio
Nick kwas portfolioNick kwas portfolio
Nick kwas portfolio
 
BU121 StudentToGo New Venture
BU121 StudentToGo New VentureBU121 StudentToGo New Venture
BU121 StudentToGo New Venture
 
Mini Case2
Mini Case2Mini Case2
Mini Case2
 
University Faculty Senate Presentaiton: Overview of Contributions Report Marc...
University Faculty Senate Presentaiton: Overview of Contributions Report Marc...University Faculty Senate Presentaiton: Overview of Contributions Report Marc...
University Faculty Senate Presentaiton: Overview of Contributions Report Marc...
 
MACE Compensation and Operation Survey Insights
MACE Compensation and Operation Survey InsightsMACE Compensation and Operation Survey Insights
MACE Compensation and Operation Survey Insights
 

Pat Services Case Study

  • 1. Case Study Current PAT Services Client Scenario • For several years PAT Services provided the PAT physician to the hospital as an independent contractor but had no other involvement. • Hospital had previously contracted with an outside service to handle PAT billing. • Eventually the hospital began billing for the service but did not recover cost. • PAT Services was asked to review PAT practice performance and made multiple suggestions regarding improving results. • PAT Services was asked to manage physician & provide billing services Notes 1) Current PAT practice payor mix used 2) Estimated patients are annualized from current PAT volumes 3) Reimbursement Rates for Medicare based upon 2009 Ohio Fee Schedule to create accurate comparison 4) Reimbursement Rates for Medicaid based upon 2009 Ohio Medicaid Fee Schedule to create accurate comparison 5) Used Ohio Medicaid rates for self-pay rates 6) Place of Service = Outpatient Hospital
  • 2. Base Assumptions Outpatient Hospital Visits Total Annual PAT Exams: 2,580 10 @ 258 Days per year Annual Ambulatory Exams: 3,870 15 @ 258 Days per year Total Department Cases: 6,450 % Examined 80% * 20% were examined by other fill-in physicians that billed for their own services Actual # of Examinations / Cases 5,160 Avg Cases per month 430 Avg PAT Cases per Day 8.0 Avg Ambulatory Cases per Day 12.0 Avg Total Patients per Day 20.0
  • 3. New Patients Established Patients Projected Annual Collection Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After Before After Description Payor Encounters 99201 99202 99202 99203 99203 99204 99211 99212 99212 99213 99213 99214 Mix Commercial 24.41 46.89 46.89 71.10 71.10 118.68 22.89 24.06 43.38 46.42 67.80 71.90 Rates Commercial 30% 1,548 $26,453 $39,925 $10,889 $27,514 - $18,372 $1,772 $1,862 $6,715 $2,156 - $2,226 $45,828 $92,054 Reimbursement Medicaid 21.81 48.03 36.05 68.82 53.48 70.32 13.43 24.75 24.75 40.38 40.38 61.24 Rates Medicaid 4% 206 $3,151 $5,452 $1,116 $3,551 - $1,451 $139 $255 $511 $250 - $253 $4,917 $11,213 Reimbursement Medicare 23.25 44.66 44.66 67.71 67.71 113.03 21.80 22.91 41.31 44.21 64.57 68.48 Rates Medicare 58% 2,993 $48,708 $73,512 $20,049 $50,661 - $33,828 $3,262 $3,428 $12,363 $3,969 - $4,099 $84,382 $169,497 Reimbursement Self Pay Rates 16.36 36.02 27.04 51.62 40.11 52.74 10.07 18.56 18.56 30.29 30.29 45.93 Self Pay 8% 413 $4,727 $8,179 $1,674 $5,327 - $2,177 $208 $383 $766 $375 - $379 $7,375 $16,820 Collections Other 0% - 58.33 58.33 94.76 94.76 131.27 131.27 29.16 29.16 47.49 47.49 67.48 67.48 Total 100% 5,160 $83,039 $127,068 $33,728 $87,052 - $55,828 $5,380 $5,929 $20,355 $6,750 - $6,957 $142,502 $289,584 % of Care Assumption 70% 55% 15% 25% 0% 10% 5% 5% 10% 3% 0% 2%
  • 4. 300,000 Before 280,000 After 260,000 240,000 220,000 200,000 180,000 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 Commercial Medicaid Medicare Self Pay Collections Total Reimbursement Reimbursement Reimbursement
  • 5. Conclusion • PAT Services previously provided physician to client hospital as an independent contractor but had no other involvement • Hospital previously contracted with an outside service to handle PAT billing & eventually began handling billing internally but could not recover cost • PAT Services was asked to review PAT practice performance and made multiple suggestions regarding improving results • PAT Services was asked to manage physician & provide billing service. • Upon engaging in management of PAT department the same physician was retrained in E & M code selection & correct documentation by PAT services experts. • PAT Services initated quarterly internal chart audits with results communicated back to physician • PAT Service increased annual collections by more than 100% for client hospital from $142,502 to $289,584, which in turn transitioned the hospital’s PAT department from a cost center to a revenue generating center