SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 30
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
Sensitivity and specificity
Predictive values positive and negative
Interpretation of results
Sep 2007
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
OutlineOutline
• Intrinsic characteristics of a test
– Sensitivity
– Specificity
• Performance of a test in a population
– Predictive value of a positive test
– Predictive value of a negative test
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
SensitivitySensitivity
Sensitivity = True positives / Affected persons
Estimate the 95% confidence interval
Persons testing positive
(True positives)
Persons testing negative
(False negatives)
Affected persons
(Positive by gold standard)
The sensitivity of a test in the ability of the test to identify
correctly affected individuals
Proportion of persons testing positive among affected individuals
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
Estimating the sensitivity of a testEstimating the sensitivity of a test
• Identify affected individuals with a gold standard
• Obtain a wide panel of samples that are representative of the
population of affected individuals
– Recent and old cases
– Severe and mild cases
– Various ages and sexes
• Test the affected individuals
• Estimate the proportion of affected individuals that are
positive with the test
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
Estimating the sensitivity of a rapid testEstimating the sensitivity of a rapid test
for leishmaniasisfor leishmaniasis
• Identify persons with leishmaniasis with a gold standard
– Parasitologically proven infection
• Obtain a wide panel of samples that are representative of the
population of individuals with leishmaniasis
– Recent and old cases
– Severe and asymptomatic cases
– Various ages and sexes
• Test the persons with leishmaniasis
• Estimate the proportion of persons with leishmaniasis that
are positive with the rapid test
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
Sensitivity of a rapid test forSensitivity of a rapid test for
leishmaniasisleishmaniasis
Patients with
leishmaniasis
Rapid test
True positive 148
False negative 2
150
Sensitivity = 148 / (150) = 98%
95% confidence interval: 94%-99%
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
What factors influenceWhat factors influence
the sensitivity of a test?the sensitivity of a test?
• Characteristics of the affected persons?
 YES: Antigenic characteristics of the pathogen in the area
(e.g., if the test was not prepared with antigens reflecting the
population of pathogens in the area, it will not pick up infected
persons in the area)
• Characteristics of the non-affected persons?
 NO: The sensitivity is estimated on a population of affected persons
• Prevalence of the disease?
 NO: The sensitivity is estimated on a population of affected persons
Sensitivity is an INTRINSIC characteristic of the test
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
SpecificitySpecificity
Specificity = True negatives / Non-affected persons
Estimate the 95% confidence interval
Persons testing negative
(True negatives)
Persons testing positive
(False positives)
Non-affected persons
(Negative by gold standard)
The specificity of a test in the ability of the test to identify
correctly non-affected individuals
Proportion of person testing negative among non affected individuals
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
Estimating the specificity of a testEstimating the specificity of a test
• Identify non affected individuals
– Negative with a gold standard
– Unlikely to be infected
• Obtain a wide panel of samples that are representative of the
population of non-affected individuals
– Diverse unaffected population: Difficult to find. Ideally, those
individuals that would need to be tested but not infected
• Test the non-affected individuals
• Estimate the proportion of non-affected individuals that are
negative with the test
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
Estimating the specificity of a rapid testEstimating the specificity of a rapid test
for leishmaniasisfor leishmaniasis
• Identify persons without leishmaniasis
– Persons without sign and symptoms of the infection
– Persons at low risk of infection, negative with gold standard
• Obtain a wide panel of samples that are representative of the
population of individuals without leishmaniasis
– Persons from neighbouring villages having similar characteristics
but with no transmission and no infections
• Test the persons without leishmaniasis
• Estimate the proportion of persons without leishmaniasis
that are negative with the rapid test
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
Specificity of a rapid test forSpecificity of a rapid test for
leishmaniasisleishmaniasis
Individuals
without
leishmaniasis
Test
False positive 12
True negative 188
200
Specificity = 188 / 200 = 94%
95% confidence interval: 90%-96%
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
What factors influenceWhat factors influence
the specificity of a test?the specificity of a test?
• Characteristics of the affected persons?
 NO: The specificity is estimated on a population of non affected
• Characteristics of the non-affected persons?
 YES: The diversity of antibodies to various other antigens in the
population may affect cross reactivity (e.g., If malaria is endemic,
polyclonal hyper gammaglobulinemia may increase the proportion
of false positives)
• Prevalence of the disease?
 NO: The specificity is estimated on a population of non affected
Specificity is an INTRINSIC characteristic of the test
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
Identifying the cut-off to use with a testIdentifying the cut-off to use with a test
on the basis of panel analysis: Ideal caseon the basis of panel analysis: Ideal case
Cut-off
0
5
10
15
20
25
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Possible values of the test
Numberoftests
Sick
Well
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
Identifying the cut-off to use with a testIdentifying the cut-off to use with a test
on the basis of panel analysis: Real caseon the basis of panel analysis: Real case
Cut-off
0
5
10
15
20
25
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Possible values of the test
Numberoftests
Sick
Well
True
negatives
False
negatives
True
positives
False
positives
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
To whom sensitivity and specificityTo whom sensitivity and specificity
matters most?matters most?
• Look at denominators!
– Panels of affected individuals
– Panels of negative individuals
• To laboratory specialists!
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
OutlineOutline
• Intrinsic characteristics of a test
– Sensitivity
– Specificity
• Performance of a test in a population
– Predictive value of a positive test
– Predictive value of a negative test
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
How is the test doing in a real population?How is the test doing in a real population?
Status of persons
Affected Non-affected
Test
Positive True + False + A+B
Negative False - True - C+D
A + C B+D A+C+B+D
• The test is now used in a real population
• This population is made of
– Affected individuals
– Non-affected individuals
• The proportion of affected individuals is the prevalence
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
Predictive value of a positive testPredictive value of a positive test
Persons affected
(True positives)
Persons not affected
(False positives)
Persons testing positive
(Positive by test)
Predictive value of a positive test =
True positives / Persons testing positive
Estimate the 95% confidence interval
The predictive value of a positive test is the probability that
an individual testing positive is truly affected
Proportion of affected persons among those testing positive
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
Predictive value of a positive testPredictive value of a positive test
Status of persons
Affected Non-affected
Test
Positive A B A+B
Negative C D C+D
A + C B+D A+C+B+D
PVP = A / (A+B)
This is only valid for the sample of specimens tested
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
What factors influenceWhat factors influence
the predictive value positive of a test?the predictive value positive of a test?
• Sensitivity?
 YES: To some extend.
• Specificity?
 YES: The more the test is specific, the more it will be negative for
non affected persons. Thus, when the test is positive, it is probably
truly positive (All non affected were correctly identified as testing
negative).
• Prevalence of the disease?
 YES: Low prevalence: The test will pick up more false positives
 YES: High prevalence: The test will pick up more true positives
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
Predictive value positive of a testPredictive value positive of a test
according to prevalence and specificityaccording to prevalence and specificity
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Prevalence (%)
PVP % 70%
80%
90%
95%
Specificity
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
Predictive value of a negative testPredictive value of a negative test
Persons non affected
(True negatives)
Persons affected
(False negatives)
Persons testing negative
(Negative by test)
Predictive value of a negative test =
True negatives / Persons testing negative
Estimate the 95% confidence interval
The predictive value of a negative test is the probability that
an individual testing negative is truly non-affected
Proportion of non-affected persons among those testing negative
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
Predictive value of a negative testPredictive value of a negative test
Status of persons
Affected Non-affected
Test
Positive A B A+B
Negative C D C+D
A + C B+D A+C+B+D
PVN = D / (C+D)
This is only valid for the sample of specimens tested
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
What factors influenceWhat factors influence
the predictive value negative of a test?the predictive value negative of a test?
• Sensitivity?
 YES: The more the test is sensitive, the more it captures affected
persons. Thus, when the test is negative, it is probably truly
negative (all affected were captured among the positive).
• Specificity?
 YES: But to a lesser extend.
• Prevalence of the disease?
 YES: Low prevalence: The test will pick up more true negatives
 YES: High prevalence: The test will pick up more false negatives
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
Predictive value negative of a testPredictive value negative of a test
according to prevalence and sensitivityaccording to prevalence and sensitivity
Sensitivity
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Prevalence (%)
PVN %
70%
80%
90%
95%
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
Relation between predictive values andRelation between predictive values and
(1) sensitivity and (2) specificity(1) sensitivity and (2) specificity
PVP =
Se.P
Se.P+(1−Sp)(1−P)
PVN=
Sp(1-P)
Sp(1-P)+(1−Se).P
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
Positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictivePositive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive
values of a test according to the prevalencevalues of a test according to the prevalence
(95% sensitivity and specificity)(95% sensitivity and specificity)
0
20
40
60
80
100
Prevalence (%)
Predictivevalue(%)
PVP
PVN
0 50 75 10025
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
To whom predictive values matters most?To whom predictive values matters most?
• Look at denominators!
– Persons testing positive
– Persons testing negative
• To clinicians and epidemiologists!
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
SummarySummary
• Sensitivity and specificity matter to laboratory specialists
– Studied on panels of positives and negatives
– Look into the intrinsic characteristics of the test:
• Capacity to pick affected
• Capacity to pick non affected
• Predictive values matter to clinicians and epidemiologists
– Studied on homogeneous populations
– Look into the performance of the test in real life:
• What to make of a positive test
• What to make of a negative test
E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists
Developed by:
The Department of Epidemic and Pandemic Alert
and Response of the World Health Organization
with the assistance of:
European Program for Field Epidemiology
Training
Canadian Field Epidemiology Programme
Thailand Ministry of Health
Institut Pasteur
Interpretation of results

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Class corticosteroids new
Class corticosteroids newClass corticosteroids new
Class corticosteroids newRaghu Prasada
 
Speech and language difficulties (2002)
Speech and language difficulties (2002)Speech and language difficulties (2002)
Speech and language difficulties (2002)Dorothy Bishop
 
B howard ot process iii vestibular system for ots 4 2015
B howard ot process iii vestibular system for ots 4 2015B howard ot process iii vestibular system for ots 4 2015
B howard ot process iii vestibular system for ots 4 2015Brenda Howard
 
Vestibular function test and its clinical examination
Vestibular function test and its clinical examinationVestibular function test and its clinical examination
Vestibular function test and its clinical examinationkhushali52
 
Meniere's disease
Meniere's  diseaseMeniere's  disease
Meniere's diseaseSaef Moniem
 
Hearing aids & implantable hearing devices
Hearing aids & implantable hearing devicesHearing aids & implantable hearing devices
Hearing aids & implantable hearing devicesAnagha Anand
 
Evidence-Based Practice in Vestibular Rehabilitation
Evidence-Based Practice in Vestibular RehabilitationEvidence-Based Practice in Vestibular Rehabilitation
Evidence-Based Practice in Vestibular RehabilitationBrenda Howard
 
Hearing aids
Hearing aidsHearing aids
Hearing aidsjettfoo
 

Viewers also liked (14)

Class corticosteroids new
Class corticosteroids newClass corticosteroids new
Class corticosteroids new
 
Speech and language difficulties (2002)
Speech and language difficulties (2002)Speech and language difficulties (2002)
Speech and language difficulties (2002)
 
Meniere’s disease
Meniere’s diseaseMeniere’s disease
Meniere’s disease
 
B howard ot process iii vestibular system for ots 4 2015
B howard ot process iii vestibular system for ots 4 2015B howard ot process iii vestibular system for ots 4 2015
B howard ot process iii vestibular system for ots 4 2015
 
Vestibular function test and its clinical examination
Vestibular function test and its clinical examinationVestibular function test and its clinical examination
Vestibular function test and its clinical examination
 
Meniere's disease
Meniere's  diseaseMeniere's  disease
Meniere's disease
 
Hearing aids
Hearing aidsHearing aids
Hearing aids
 
Meniere’s disease
Meniere’s diseaseMeniere’s disease
Meniere’s disease
 
Hearing aids & implantable hearing devices
Hearing aids & implantable hearing devicesHearing aids & implantable hearing devices
Hearing aids & implantable hearing devices
 
293. ischemic heart disease
293. ischemic heart disease293. ischemic heart disease
293. ischemic heart disease
 
Corticosteroids Pharmacology - drdhriti
Corticosteroids Pharmacology - drdhritiCorticosteroids Pharmacology - drdhriti
Corticosteroids Pharmacology - drdhriti
 
Anatomy and physiology of the ear
Anatomy and physiology of the earAnatomy and physiology of the ear
Anatomy and physiology of the ear
 
Evidence-Based Practice in Vestibular Rehabilitation
Evidence-Based Practice in Vestibular RehabilitationEvidence-Based Practice in Vestibular Rehabilitation
Evidence-Based Practice in Vestibular Rehabilitation
 
Hearing aids
Hearing aidsHearing aids
Hearing aids
 

Similar to Ihr l18asensititvity specificity_en

Screening test (basic concepts)
Screening test (basic concepts)Screening test (basic concepts)
Screening test (basic concepts)Tarek Tawfik Amin
 
8 screening.pptxscreening.pptxscreening.
8 screening.pptxscreening.pptxscreening.8 screening.pptxscreening.pptxscreening.
8 screening.pptxscreening.pptxscreening.Wasihun Aragie
 
7 Lecture 8 Outbrek invesitgation.pptx
7 Lecture 8 Outbrek invesitgation.pptx7 Lecture 8 Outbrek invesitgation.pptx
7 Lecture 8 Outbrek invesitgation.pptxmergawekwaya
 
Probability.pdf.pdf and Statistics for R
Probability.pdf.pdf and Statistics for RProbability.pdf.pdf and Statistics for R
Probability.pdf.pdf and Statistics for RSakhileKhoza2
 
Diagnotic and screening tests
Diagnotic and screening testsDiagnotic and screening tests
Diagnotic and screening testsjfwilson2
 
Surveillance and screening-cp.pptx
Surveillance and screening-cp.pptxSurveillance and screening-cp.pptx
Surveillance and screening-cp.pptxchcjayanagara
 
VALIDITY AND RELIABLITY OF A SCREENING TEST seminar 2.pptx
VALIDITY AND RELIABLITY OF A SCREENING TEST seminar 2.pptxVALIDITY AND RELIABLITY OF A SCREENING TEST seminar 2.pptx
VALIDITY AND RELIABLITY OF A SCREENING TEST seminar 2.pptxShaliniPattanayak
 
Evaluating diagnostic tests.pptx
Evaluating diagnostic tests.pptxEvaluating diagnostic tests.pptx
Evaluating diagnostic tests.pptxangelabraver1
 
Learning about validation from journal appraisal
Learning about validation from journal appraisalLearning about validation from journal appraisal
Learning about validation from journal appraisalChai-Eng Tan
 
Evidence-based diagnosis
Evidence-based diagnosisEvidence-based diagnosis
Evidence-based diagnosisHesham Gaber
 
OAJ presentation final draft
OAJ presentation final draftOAJ presentation final draft
OAJ presentation final draftBrian Eisen
 
screening and diagnostic testing
screening and diagnostic  testingscreening and diagnostic  testing
screening and diagnostic testingamitakashyap1
 

Similar to Ihr l18asensititvity specificity_en (20)

Screening test (basic concepts)
Screening test (basic concepts)Screening test (basic concepts)
Screening test (basic concepts)
 
8 screening.pptxscreening.pptxscreening.
8 screening.pptxscreening.pptxscreening.8 screening.pptxscreening.pptxscreening.
8 screening.pptxscreening.pptxscreening.
 
7 Lecture 8 Outbrek invesitgation.pptx
7 Lecture 8 Outbrek invesitgation.pptx7 Lecture 8 Outbrek invesitgation.pptx
7 Lecture 8 Outbrek invesitgation.pptx
 
Probability.pdf.pdf and Statistics for R
Probability.pdf.pdf and Statistics for RProbability.pdf.pdf and Statistics for R
Probability.pdf.pdf and Statistics for R
 
Disease screening
Disease screeningDisease screening
Disease screening
 
Screening of Diseases
Screening of DiseasesScreening of Diseases
Screening of Diseases
 
Screening
ScreeningScreening
Screening
 
Statistical analysis definitions
Statistical analysis definitionsStatistical analysis definitions
Statistical analysis definitions
 
Diagnotic and screening tests
Diagnotic and screening testsDiagnotic and screening tests
Diagnotic and screening tests
 
Surveillance and screening-cp.pptx
Surveillance and screening-cp.pptxSurveillance and screening-cp.pptx
Surveillance and screening-cp.pptx
 
Screening tests
Screening  testsScreening  tests
Screening tests
 
VALIDITY AND RELIABLITY OF A SCREENING TEST seminar 2.pptx
VALIDITY AND RELIABLITY OF A SCREENING TEST seminar 2.pptxVALIDITY AND RELIABLITY OF A SCREENING TEST seminar 2.pptx
VALIDITY AND RELIABLITY OF A SCREENING TEST seminar 2.pptx
 
Evidence Based Diagnosis
Evidence Based DiagnosisEvidence Based Diagnosis
Evidence Based Diagnosis
 
Evaluating diagnostic tests.pptx
Evaluating diagnostic tests.pptxEvaluating diagnostic tests.pptx
Evaluating diagnostic tests.pptx
 
LHR.pptx
LHR.pptxLHR.pptx
LHR.pptx
 
Validity and Screening Test
Validity and Screening TestValidity and Screening Test
Validity and Screening Test
 
Learning about validation from journal appraisal
Learning about validation from journal appraisalLearning about validation from journal appraisal
Learning about validation from journal appraisal
 
Evidence-based diagnosis
Evidence-based diagnosisEvidence-based diagnosis
Evidence-based diagnosis
 
OAJ presentation final draft
OAJ presentation final draftOAJ presentation final draft
OAJ presentation final draft
 
screening and diagnostic testing
screening and diagnostic  testingscreening and diagnostic  testing
screening and diagnostic testing
 

Ihr l18asensititvity specificity_en

  • 1. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists Sensitivity and specificity Predictive values positive and negative Interpretation of results Sep 2007
  • 2. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists OutlineOutline • Intrinsic characteristics of a test – Sensitivity – Specificity • Performance of a test in a population – Predictive value of a positive test – Predictive value of a negative test
  • 3. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists SensitivitySensitivity Sensitivity = True positives / Affected persons Estimate the 95% confidence interval Persons testing positive (True positives) Persons testing negative (False negatives) Affected persons (Positive by gold standard) The sensitivity of a test in the ability of the test to identify correctly affected individuals Proportion of persons testing positive among affected individuals
  • 4. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists Estimating the sensitivity of a testEstimating the sensitivity of a test • Identify affected individuals with a gold standard • Obtain a wide panel of samples that are representative of the population of affected individuals – Recent and old cases – Severe and mild cases – Various ages and sexes • Test the affected individuals • Estimate the proportion of affected individuals that are positive with the test
  • 5. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists Estimating the sensitivity of a rapid testEstimating the sensitivity of a rapid test for leishmaniasisfor leishmaniasis • Identify persons with leishmaniasis with a gold standard – Parasitologically proven infection • Obtain a wide panel of samples that are representative of the population of individuals with leishmaniasis – Recent and old cases – Severe and asymptomatic cases – Various ages and sexes • Test the persons with leishmaniasis • Estimate the proportion of persons with leishmaniasis that are positive with the rapid test
  • 6. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists Sensitivity of a rapid test forSensitivity of a rapid test for leishmaniasisleishmaniasis Patients with leishmaniasis Rapid test True positive 148 False negative 2 150 Sensitivity = 148 / (150) = 98% 95% confidence interval: 94%-99%
  • 7. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists What factors influenceWhat factors influence the sensitivity of a test?the sensitivity of a test? • Characteristics of the affected persons?  YES: Antigenic characteristics of the pathogen in the area (e.g., if the test was not prepared with antigens reflecting the population of pathogens in the area, it will not pick up infected persons in the area) • Characteristics of the non-affected persons?  NO: The sensitivity is estimated on a population of affected persons • Prevalence of the disease?  NO: The sensitivity is estimated on a population of affected persons Sensitivity is an INTRINSIC characteristic of the test
  • 8. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists SpecificitySpecificity Specificity = True negatives / Non-affected persons Estimate the 95% confidence interval Persons testing negative (True negatives) Persons testing positive (False positives) Non-affected persons (Negative by gold standard) The specificity of a test in the ability of the test to identify correctly non-affected individuals Proportion of person testing negative among non affected individuals
  • 9. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists Estimating the specificity of a testEstimating the specificity of a test • Identify non affected individuals – Negative with a gold standard – Unlikely to be infected • Obtain a wide panel of samples that are representative of the population of non-affected individuals – Diverse unaffected population: Difficult to find. Ideally, those individuals that would need to be tested but not infected • Test the non-affected individuals • Estimate the proportion of non-affected individuals that are negative with the test
  • 10. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists Estimating the specificity of a rapid testEstimating the specificity of a rapid test for leishmaniasisfor leishmaniasis • Identify persons without leishmaniasis – Persons without sign and symptoms of the infection – Persons at low risk of infection, negative with gold standard • Obtain a wide panel of samples that are representative of the population of individuals without leishmaniasis – Persons from neighbouring villages having similar characteristics but with no transmission and no infections • Test the persons without leishmaniasis • Estimate the proportion of persons without leishmaniasis that are negative with the rapid test
  • 11. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists Specificity of a rapid test forSpecificity of a rapid test for leishmaniasisleishmaniasis Individuals without leishmaniasis Test False positive 12 True negative 188 200 Specificity = 188 / 200 = 94% 95% confidence interval: 90%-96%
  • 12. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists What factors influenceWhat factors influence the specificity of a test?the specificity of a test? • Characteristics of the affected persons?  NO: The specificity is estimated on a population of non affected • Characteristics of the non-affected persons?  YES: The diversity of antibodies to various other antigens in the population may affect cross reactivity (e.g., If malaria is endemic, polyclonal hyper gammaglobulinemia may increase the proportion of false positives) • Prevalence of the disease?  NO: The specificity is estimated on a population of non affected Specificity is an INTRINSIC characteristic of the test
  • 13. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists Identifying the cut-off to use with a testIdentifying the cut-off to use with a test on the basis of panel analysis: Ideal caseon the basis of panel analysis: Ideal case Cut-off 0 5 10 15 20 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Possible values of the test Numberoftests Sick Well
  • 14. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists Identifying the cut-off to use with a testIdentifying the cut-off to use with a test on the basis of panel analysis: Real caseon the basis of panel analysis: Real case Cut-off 0 5 10 15 20 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Possible values of the test Numberoftests Sick Well True negatives False negatives True positives False positives
  • 15. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists To whom sensitivity and specificityTo whom sensitivity and specificity matters most?matters most? • Look at denominators! – Panels of affected individuals – Panels of negative individuals • To laboratory specialists!
  • 16. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists OutlineOutline • Intrinsic characteristics of a test – Sensitivity – Specificity • Performance of a test in a population – Predictive value of a positive test – Predictive value of a negative test
  • 17. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists How is the test doing in a real population?How is the test doing in a real population? Status of persons Affected Non-affected Test Positive True + False + A+B Negative False - True - C+D A + C B+D A+C+B+D • The test is now used in a real population • This population is made of – Affected individuals – Non-affected individuals • The proportion of affected individuals is the prevalence
  • 18. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists Predictive value of a positive testPredictive value of a positive test Persons affected (True positives) Persons not affected (False positives) Persons testing positive (Positive by test) Predictive value of a positive test = True positives / Persons testing positive Estimate the 95% confidence interval The predictive value of a positive test is the probability that an individual testing positive is truly affected Proportion of affected persons among those testing positive
  • 19. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists Predictive value of a positive testPredictive value of a positive test Status of persons Affected Non-affected Test Positive A B A+B Negative C D C+D A + C B+D A+C+B+D PVP = A / (A+B) This is only valid for the sample of specimens tested
  • 20. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists What factors influenceWhat factors influence the predictive value positive of a test?the predictive value positive of a test? • Sensitivity?  YES: To some extend. • Specificity?  YES: The more the test is specific, the more it will be negative for non affected persons. Thus, when the test is positive, it is probably truly positive (All non affected were correctly identified as testing negative). • Prevalence of the disease?  YES: Low prevalence: The test will pick up more false positives  YES: High prevalence: The test will pick up more true positives
  • 21. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists Predictive value positive of a testPredictive value positive of a test according to prevalence and specificityaccording to prevalence and specificity 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Prevalence (%) PVP % 70% 80% 90% 95% Specificity
  • 22. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists Predictive value of a negative testPredictive value of a negative test Persons non affected (True negatives) Persons affected (False negatives) Persons testing negative (Negative by test) Predictive value of a negative test = True negatives / Persons testing negative Estimate the 95% confidence interval The predictive value of a negative test is the probability that an individual testing negative is truly non-affected Proportion of non-affected persons among those testing negative
  • 23. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists Predictive value of a negative testPredictive value of a negative test Status of persons Affected Non-affected Test Positive A B A+B Negative C D C+D A + C B+D A+C+B+D PVN = D / (C+D) This is only valid for the sample of specimens tested
  • 24. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists What factors influenceWhat factors influence the predictive value negative of a test?the predictive value negative of a test? • Sensitivity?  YES: The more the test is sensitive, the more it captures affected persons. Thus, when the test is negative, it is probably truly negative (all affected were captured among the positive). • Specificity?  YES: But to a lesser extend. • Prevalence of the disease?  YES: Low prevalence: The test will pick up more true negatives  YES: High prevalence: The test will pick up more false negatives
  • 25. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists Predictive value negative of a testPredictive value negative of a test according to prevalence and sensitivityaccording to prevalence and sensitivity Sensitivity 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Prevalence (%) PVN % 70% 80% 90% 95%
  • 26. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists Relation between predictive values andRelation between predictive values and (1) sensitivity and (2) specificity(1) sensitivity and (2) specificity PVP = Se.P Se.P+(1−Sp)(1−P) PVN= Sp(1-P) Sp(1-P)+(1−Se).P
  • 27. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists Positive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictivePositive (PPV) and negative (NPV) predictive values of a test according to the prevalencevalues of a test according to the prevalence (95% sensitivity and specificity)(95% sensitivity and specificity) 0 20 40 60 80 100 Prevalence (%) Predictivevalue(%) PVP PVN 0 50 75 10025
  • 28. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists To whom predictive values matters most?To whom predictive values matters most? • Look at denominators! – Persons testing positive – Persons testing negative • To clinicians and epidemiologists!
  • 29. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists SummarySummary • Sensitivity and specificity matter to laboratory specialists – Studied on panels of positives and negatives – Look into the intrinsic characteristics of the test: • Capacity to pick affected • Capacity to pick non affected • Predictive values matter to clinicians and epidemiologists – Studied on homogeneous populations – Look into the performance of the test in real life: • What to make of a positive test • What to make of a negative test
  • 30. E P I D E M I C A L E R T A N D R E S P O N S ELaboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists Developed by: The Department of Epidemic and Pandemic Alert and Response of the World Health Organization with the assistance of: European Program for Field Epidemiology Training Canadian Field Epidemiology Programme Thailand Ministry of Health Institut Pasteur Interpretation of results