SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 35
Paper and Screen: Reading
     Strategies Used
 by Low-Proficient EFL
        Learners



                   Presenter: Sabrina Wu
               Instructor: Dr. Teresa Hsu
          1                 Date: 101.12.3
                                       1
Citation
Genc, H. (2011). Paper and Screen: Reading
Strategies Used by Low-Proficient EFL
Learners. Sino-US English Teaching, 8(10), 648-
658.




                        2                    2
Content




    3
Introduction

Background

 Although reading literature has conducted many
 studies about effective reading strategies, few studies
 have been carried out on second language online
 reading strategies.




                     4
Introduction
    Hypertext means…
It can be stored, searched, or edited.

It contains connections within the text to other documents
or locations.

It allows for non-sequencing.
    Strategies means…
Conscious decision taken by the reader.


                       5
Introduction
    Cognitive strategies                                    Meta-cognitive strategies


                                                   the strategies that function to monitor or
mental processes directly concerned with                        regulate cognitive strategies
the processing information



note taking, summarizing, paraphrasing,             thinking about the learning process,
 predicting, analyzing and using context clues     planning for learning, monitoring of
                                                 comprehension while it is taking place




                                             6
Introduction
    The purpose of the study

The aim of study is to investigate meta-cognitive
reading strategies used by low-proficient EFL learners
while reading paper-based documents and hypertext
documents for general comprehension




                       7
Research Question1

 What meta-cognitive strategies used in
 paper-based document are also
 employed by low-proficient EFL
 learners in reading a hypertext
 document for general comprehension?




               8
Research Question2

 Do low-proficient EFL learners use new

 strategies in reading a hypertext
 document for general comprehension?




              9
Literature Review 1
These studies demonstrate that successful
readers show a higher degree of
meta-cognitive awareness, which enables
them to use reading strategies more
efficiently than unsuccessful readers.



                          (Zang & Wu,2009)


                10
                  20
Literature Review 2

     Found that processing strategies used
in
     hypermedia reading were not
     essentially different from those seen for

     paper-based text.
                         (Akyel & Ercetin, 2009)



                   11
Methodology




      12
Methodology
Instrument

 Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS)
 Online Survey of Reading Strategies

 (OSORS)
 Think-aloud protocol


             13
Methodology
        Survey of Reading Strategies


   Global reading strategies

Intentional and carefully planned technique by
     learner monitor/manage their reading




                         14
Methodology
          Survey of Reading Strategies


           Support strategies

Basic support mechanisms intended to aid the reader
             in comprehending the text




                           15
Methodology
       Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS)


     Problem-solving strategies

Localized and focused technique used when problems
   develop in understanding textual information




                           16
Methodology
Online Survey of Reading Strategies (OSORS)

Totally including 38 items on this questionnaire.

Global reading strategies        18 items


Problem-solving strategies           11 items

Support strategies         9 items




                      17
Methodology


Think-aloud protocol was used as another
data collection instrument to analyze online
reading strategies in the present day.




                18
Results
Q: What meta-cognitive strategies used in paper-based document are also employed by
low-proficient EFL learners in reading a hypertext document for general
comprehension?
        Table1: Frequency of Paper-based reading strategies Used the Most and the Least
                 Strategies                 Mean.                      SD

                   SUP                      4.09                       1.07
                  PROB                      4.03                       0.92
                  PROB                      3.94                       0.97
                   SUP                      3.88                       1.22
                  PROB                      3.84                       1.06
                  PROB                      3.72                       1.07
                  GLOB                      3.72                       1.12
                  GLOB                      3.72                       1.07
                  PROB                      3.72                       0.94
                  GLOB                      3.66                       1.08
                  GLOB                      3.66                       1.08
                  PROB                      3.63                       0.93
                  GLOB                      3.53                       1.12



                                             19
PROB   3.44   1.03
PROB   3.38   0.89
GLOB   3.38   0.96
GLOB   3.38   0.96
 SUP   3.34   1.43
GLOB   3.31   1.26
GLOB   3.25   1.12
GLOB   3.19   1.07
 SUP   3.19   1.24
GLOB   3.13   1.11
 SUP   3.09   1.28
GLOB   3.06   1.30
 SUP   3.00   1.30
 SUP   2.97   1.31
 SUP   2.88   1.29
GLOB   2.88   1.45
 SUP   2.44   1.22




         20
Results

        Three level of usage are identified:

 High                     3.5 scores/ higher

Moderate               from 2.5 to 3.49 scores

 Low                      2.49 scores/ lower




                     23
Table3: Frequency of Hypertext reading strategies Used the Most and the Least
    Strategies                       Mean.                            SD
      SUP                             4.03                           1.29
     PROB                             3.91                           1.07
     GLOB                             3.66                           1.43
     PROB                             3.59                           1.25
     GLOB                             3.50                           1.30
     PROB                             3.44                           1.30
     PROB                             3.38                           1.27
     PROB                             3.38                           1.11
     PROB                             3.34                           1.31
     PROB                             3.31                           1.31
     PROB                             3.31                           1.18
      SUP                             3.16                           1.39
     GLOB                             3.16                           1.30
     GLOB                             3.09                           1.21
     PROB                             3.09                           1.38
     GLOB                             3.06                           1.22
     PROB                             3.06                           1.12
     GLOB                             3.03                           1.45




                                      21
GLOB   3.00   1.30
GLOB   2.94   1.25
GLOB   2.88   1.32
GLOB   2.84   1.12
SUP    2.84   1.28
 SUP   2.84   1.42
GLOB   2.75   1.15
GLOB   2.72   1.23
PROB   2.72   1.23
GLOB   2.69   1.21
GLOB   2.53   1.17
PROB   2.53   1.09
 SUP   2.50   1.12
GLOB   2.50   0.97
 SUP   2.47   1.20
 SUP   2.41   1.20
 SUP   2.28   1.48
GLOB   2.19   1.33
GLOB   2.16   1.15
GLOB   1.91   1.16



       22
Results

        Three level of usage are identified:

 High                     3.5 scores/ higher

Moderate               from 2.5 to 3.49 scores

 Low                      2.49 scores/ lower




                     23
Results
Q: Do low-proficient EFL learners use new strategies
   in reading a hypertext document for general comprehension?

     Paper-Based Reading Strategies
Top five paper-based reading strategies
1. When reading, I translate from English into my native language.
(support)
2. I try to get back on track when I lose concentration. (problem solving)

3. When text becomes difficult, I reread it to increase my understanding.
   (problem solving)
4. I use reference materials to help me understand what I read. (support)

5. When text becomes difficult, I pay closer attention to what I am reading.

   (problem solving)
                               24
Results
     Paper-Based Reading Strategies
Bottom five paper-based reading strategies
1. When reading, I think about information in both English and my
   mother tongue. (support)

2. I ask myself questions I like to have answered in the text.
   (support)

3. I paraphrase to better understand what I read. (support)

4. I critically analyze and evaluate the information presented in the text.
   (global)

5. When text becomes difficult, I read aloud to help me understand what I
   read. (support)



                                25
Results
    Hypertext Reading Strategies
Top five hypertext reading strategies
1. I use reference materials to help me understand what I read. (support)

2. I read slowly and carefully to make sure I understand what I am reading
   online. (problem solving)

3. I have a purpose in mind when I read online. (global)

4. When reading online, I translate from English into my native language.
   (support)

5. I use tables, figures, and pictures in the online text to increase my
   understanding. (global)



                               26
Results
     Hypertext Reading Strategies
Bottom five hypertext reading strategies

1. When text becomes difficult, I read aloud to help me understand what I
   read. (support)

2. I print out a hardcopy of the online text then underline or circle
   information to help me remember it. (support)
3. I participate in live chat with other learners of English. (global)

4. I participate in live chat with native speakers of English. (global)

5. I use typographical features like bold face and italics to identify key
   information. (global)



                                27
Results
    Think aloud protocol
Similar results supports to the quantitative analysis of the OSORS
survey.

Similar parts
Translating from English to Turkish.


“Sharks means “kopekbaligi” in Turkish, doesn’t it?”

Using reference materials, such as dictionary

“I do not know what ‘prey’ means. I would like to look it up in a
dictionary.”

                           28
Results
Different parts
Using background knowledge.


“We read something about sharks in our reading class
 before.”
Monitoring of not understanding.


“I am not familiar with these words. How will I
understand this text without knowing the meaning of the
words.”

                      29
Results
Goal setting for skimming.


“I think I am going to read something about sharks.”




                      30
Conclusion

Some of the meta-cognitive reading
strategies observed in hypertext reading are

similar to those used in paper-based
reading.
  Using reference materials   Translating from English to
                                        Turkish




                     31
Conclusion
Few emerging strategies are not used in the

paper-based reading but it used in the
hypertext documents.
     Using tables           Monitoring of not
                             understanding

   Using background      Goal setting for skimming
      knowledge




                    32
Reflection

Different level, using different teaching

materials, students also use different
learning strategies as they feel
comfortable.




              33
Thank you!

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

10122612 final proposal
10122612 final proposal10122612 final proposal
10122612 final proposal莎賓 吳
 
論文發表 V4
論文發表 V4論文發表 V4
論文發表 V4莎賓 吳
 
Inflation by Rojan Mehta
Inflation by Rojan MehtaInflation by Rojan Mehta
Inflation by Rojan MehtaRojan Mehta
 
10122612 final defense
10122612 final defense10122612 final defense
10122612 final defense莎賓 吳
 
Software Matematika Sebagai Penunjang Proses Belajar
Software Matematika Sebagai Penunjang Proses BelajarSoftware Matematika Sebagai Penunjang Proses Belajar
Software Matematika Sebagai Penunjang Proses BelajarPrandita Sega
 
Proposal defense sabrina
Proposal defense sabrinaProposal defense sabrina
Proposal defense sabrina莎賓 吳
 
2013.10.23 論文發表課
2013.10.23 論文發表課2013.10.23 論文發表課
2013.10.23 論文發表課莎賓 吳
 
Patty proposal defense
Patty proposal defensePatty proposal defense
Patty proposal defense莎賓 吳
 
Proposal Presentasi RO. Airola
Proposal Presentasi RO. AirolaProposal Presentasi RO. Airola
Proposal Presentasi RO. AirolaGanjar Wijaya
 

Viewers also liked (10)

10122612 final proposal
10122612 final proposal10122612 final proposal
10122612 final proposal
 
論文發表 V4
論文發表 V4論文發表 V4
論文發表 V4
 
Inflation by Rojan Mehta
Inflation by Rojan MehtaInflation by Rojan Mehta
Inflation by Rojan Mehta
 
10122612 final defense
10122612 final defense10122612 final defense
10122612 final defense
 
Software Matematika Sebagai Penunjang Proses Belajar
Software Matematika Sebagai Penunjang Proses BelajarSoftware Matematika Sebagai Penunjang Proses Belajar
Software Matematika Sebagai Penunjang Proses Belajar
 
Proposal defense sabrina
Proposal defense sabrinaProposal defense sabrina
Proposal defense sabrina
 
2013.10.23 論文發表課
2013.10.23 論文發表課2013.10.23 論文發表課
2013.10.23 論文發表課
 
The speckled band
The speckled bandThe speckled band
The speckled band
 
Patty proposal defense
Patty proposal defensePatty proposal defense
Patty proposal defense
 
Proposal Presentasi RO. Airola
Proposal Presentasi RO. AirolaProposal Presentasi RO. Airola
Proposal Presentasi RO. Airola
 

論文寫作發表2

  • 1. Paper and Screen: Reading Strategies Used by Low-Proficient EFL Learners Presenter: Sabrina Wu Instructor: Dr. Teresa Hsu 1 Date: 101.12.3 1
  • 2. Citation Genc, H. (2011). Paper and Screen: Reading Strategies Used by Low-Proficient EFL Learners. Sino-US English Teaching, 8(10), 648- 658. 2 2
  • 4. Introduction Background Although reading literature has conducted many studies about effective reading strategies, few studies have been carried out on second language online reading strategies. 4
  • 5. Introduction Hypertext means… It can be stored, searched, or edited. It contains connections within the text to other documents or locations. It allows for non-sequencing. Strategies means… Conscious decision taken by the reader. 5
  • 6. Introduction Cognitive strategies Meta-cognitive strategies the strategies that function to monitor or mental processes directly concerned with regulate cognitive strategies the processing information note taking, summarizing, paraphrasing, thinking about the learning process, predicting, analyzing and using context clues planning for learning, monitoring of comprehension while it is taking place 6
  • 7. Introduction The purpose of the study The aim of study is to investigate meta-cognitive reading strategies used by low-proficient EFL learners while reading paper-based documents and hypertext documents for general comprehension 7
  • 8. Research Question1 What meta-cognitive strategies used in paper-based document are also employed by low-proficient EFL learners in reading a hypertext document for general comprehension? 8
  • 9. Research Question2 Do low-proficient EFL learners use new strategies in reading a hypertext document for general comprehension? 9
  • 10. Literature Review 1 These studies demonstrate that successful readers show a higher degree of meta-cognitive awareness, which enables them to use reading strategies more efficiently than unsuccessful readers. (Zang & Wu,2009) 10 20
  • 11. Literature Review 2 Found that processing strategies used in hypermedia reading were not essentially different from those seen for paper-based text. (Akyel & Ercetin, 2009) 11
  • 13. Methodology Instrument Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS) Online Survey of Reading Strategies (OSORS) Think-aloud protocol 13
  • 14. Methodology Survey of Reading Strategies Global reading strategies Intentional and carefully planned technique by learner monitor/manage their reading 14
  • 15. Methodology Survey of Reading Strategies Support strategies Basic support mechanisms intended to aid the reader in comprehending the text 15
  • 16. Methodology Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS) Problem-solving strategies Localized and focused technique used when problems develop in understanding textual information 16
  • 17. Methodology Online Survey of Reading Strategies (OSORS) Totally including 38 items on this questionnaire. Global reading strategies 18 items Problem-solving strategies 11 items Support strategies 9 items 17
  • 18. Methodology Think-aloud protocol was used as another data collection instrument to analyze online reading strategies in the present day. 18
  • 19. Results Q: What meta-cognitive strategies used in paper-based document are also employed by low-proficient EFL learners in reading a hypertext document for general comprehension? Table1: Frequency of Paper-based reading strategies Used the Most and the Least Strategies Mean. SD SUP 4.09 1.07 PROB 4.03 0.92 PROB 3.94 0.97 SUP 3.88 1.22 PROB 3.84 1.06 PROB 3.72 1.07 GLOB 3.72 1.12 GLOB 3.72 1.07 PROB 3.72 0.94 GLOB 3.66 1.08 GLOB 3.66 1.08 PROB 3.63 0.93 GLOB 3.53 1.12 19
  • 20. PROB 3.44 1.03 PROB 3.38 0.89 GLOB 3.38 0.96 GLOB 3.38 0.96 SUP 3.34 1.43 GLOB 3.31 1.26 GLOB 3.25 1.12 GLOB 3.19 1.07 SUP 3.19 1.24 GLOB 3.13 1.11 SUP 3.09 1.28 GLOB 3.06 1.30 SUP 3.00 1.30 SUP 2.97 1.31 SUP 2.88 1.29 GLOB 2.88 1.45 SUP 2.44 1.22 20
  • 21. Results Three level of usage are identified: High 3.5 scores/ higher Moderate from 2.5 to 3.49 scores Low 2.49 scores/ lower 23
  • 22. Table3: Frequency of Hypertext reading strategies Used the Most and the Least Strategies Mean. SD SUP 4.03 1.29 PROB 3.91 1.07 GLOB 3.66 1.43 PROB 3.59 1.25 GLOB 3.50 1.30 PROB 3.44 1.30 PROB 3.38 1.27 PROB 3.38 1.11 PROB 3.34 1.31 PROB 3.31 1.31 PROB 3.31 1.18 SUP 3.16 1.39 GLOB 3.16 1.30 GLOB 3.09 1.21 PROB 3.09 1.38 GLOB 3.06 1.22 PROB 3.06 1.12 GLOB 3.03 1.45 21
  • 23. GLOB 3.00 1.30 GLOB 2.94 1.25 GLOB 2.88 1.32 GLOB 2.84 1.12 SUP 2.84 1.28 SUP 2.84 1.42 GLOB 2.75 1.15 GLOB 2.72 1.23 PROB 2.72 1.23 GLOB 2.69 1.21 GLOB 2.53 1.17 PROB 2.53 1.09 SUP 2.50 1.12 GLOB 2.50 0.97 SUP 2.47 1.20 SUP 2.41 1.20 SUP 2.28 1.48 GLOB 2.19 1.33 GLOB 2.16 1.15 GLOB 1.91 1.16 22
  • 24. Results Three level of usage are identified: High 3.5 scores/ higher Moderate from 2.5 to 3.49 scores Low 2.49 scores/ lower 23
  • 25. Results Q: Do low-proficient EFL learners use new strategies in reading a hypertext document for general comprehension? Paper-Based Reading Strategies Top five paper-based reading strategies 1. When reading, I translate from English into my native language. (support) 2. I try to get back on track when I lose concentration. (problem solving) 3. When text becomes difficult, I reread it to increase my understanding. (problem solving) 4. I use reference materials to help me understand what I read. (support) 5. When text becomes difficult, I pay closer attention to what I am reading. (problem solving) 24
  • 26. Results Paper-Based Reading Strategies Bottom five paper-based reading strategies 1. When reading, I think about information in both English and my mother tongue. (support) 2. I ask myself questions I like to have answered in the text. (support) 3. I paraphrase to better understand what I read. (support) 4. I critically analyze and evaluate the information presented in the text. (global) 5. When text becomes difficult, I read aloud to help me understand what I read. (support) 25
  • 27. Results Hypertext Reading Strategies Top five hypertext reading strategies 1. I use reference materials to help me understand what I read. (support) 2. I read slowly and carefully to make sure I understand what I am reading online. (problem solving) 3. I have a purpose in mind when I read online. (global) 4. When reading online, I translate from English into my native language. (support) 5. I use tables, figures, and pictures in the online text to increase my understanding. (global) 26
  • 28. Results Hypertext Reading Strategies Bottom five hypertext reading strategies 1. When text becomes difficult, I read aloud to help me understand what I read. (support) 2. I print out a hardcopy of the online text then underline or circle information to help me remember it. (support) 3. I participate in live chat with other learners of English. (global) 4. I participate in live chat with native speakers of English. (global) 5. I use typographical features like bold face and italics to identify key information. (global) 27
  • 29. Results Think aloud protocol Similar results supports to the quantitative analysis of the OSORS survey. Similar parts Translating from English to Turkish. “Sharks means “kopekbaligi” in Turkish, doesn’t it?” Using reference materials, such as dictionary “I do not know what ‘prey’ means. I would like to look it up in a dictionary.” 28
  • 30. Results Different parts Using background knowledge. “We read something about sharks in our reading class before.” Monitoring of not understanding. “I am not familiar with these words. How will I understand this text without knowing the meaning of the words.” 29
  • 31. Results Goal setting for skimming. “I think I am going to read something about sharks.” 30
  • 32. Conclusion Some of the meta-cognitive reading strategies observed in hypertext reading are similar to those used in paper-based reading. Using reference materials Translating from English to Turkish 31
  • 33. Conclusion Few emerging strategies are not used in the paper-based reading but it used in the hypertext documents. Using tables Monitoring of not understanding Using background Goal setting for skimming knowledge 32
  • 34. Reflection Different level, using different teaching materials, students also use different learning strategies as they feel comfortable. 33