SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 4
American Legal System                                    Student Name:



Mock Trial Rubric

1. Student has a clear understanding of the mock trial rules of procedure.            _____

2. Student has a clear understanding of the burden of proof.                          _____

3. Student is able to present information in logical and articulate manner.           _____

4. Student contributes, listen and respect each other.                                _____

5. Student understands the steps in the trial.                                        _____

6. Student participates in class discussions and trial planning.                      _____

7. Student understands that they are limited to the materials provided in the mock trial
packet.                                                                             _____

8. During the trial phase students are dressed appropriately for the trial setting.   _____

9. Students stay focused during class preparation. They stay focused on task and do not
have outside conversations that have no relevance to the trial.                  _____

10. Student was in class throughout the planning phase and the trial.                 _____



0 - poor

5 - below average

10 - good/average

15 - strong/effective

20 - excellent
High School Mock Trial Rubric - Attorney Opening/Closing

For use in teaching the mock trial process and for evaluating student presentations.

These forms are provided to help teachers and coaches evaluate student learning in the
mock trial process. This rubric is specifically formulated for students who are assigned
the task of crafting and presenting an opening statement or a closing argument.

1 - poor 2 - below average 3 - good/average 4 - strong/effective 5 - excellent



1. Student comprehends the various statements of fact and has a clear idea of the burden
of proof.

2. Student provides an accurate synopsis of what needs to be discussed in an opening
statement.

3. Student provides an accurate synopsis of what needs to be discussed in a closing
argument, and understands that there are limits on what may be included based on what is
discussed during the trial.

4. Delivery of opening and/or closing is clear and concise, with minimal reliance on
notes.

5. Student speaks clearly and loudly enough to be heard throughout the room.

6. Student directs comments to the appropriate audience; including judge, jury or witness,
with good eye contact.

7. Student exhibits appropriate courtroom decorum and respect for all parties in the trial,
including opposing counsel and witnesses.

8. Statements are organized into thoughtful and methodical presentations.

9. Appropriate time limits are followed.
10. Students performing closing arguments use appropriate information only and indicate
that they listened and understood opposing arguments.

High School Mock Trial Rubric - Attorney Direct/Cross

For use in teaching the mock trial process and for evaluating student presentations.

These forms are provided to help teachers and coaches evaluate student learning in the
mock trial process. This rubric is specifically formulated for students who are assigned
the task of crafting and presenting an opening statement or a closing argument.

1 - poor 2 - below average 3 - good/average 4 - strong/effective 5 - excellent

1. Student comprehends the various statements of fact and has a clear idea of the burden
of proof and is able to establish a foundation for documents.

2. Student develops questions for direct that indicate a clear understanding of the case
and how it should be proved.

3. Questions are appropriate for direct or cross, i.e. no leading questions on direct.

4. Delivery of questions on direct and/or cross is clear and concise, with minimal reliance
on notes.

5. Student speaks clearly and loudly enough to be heard throughout the room.

6. Student directs comments to the appropriate audience; including judge, jury or witness,
with good eye contact.

7. Student exhibits appropriate courtroom decorum and respect for all parties in the trial,
including opposing counsel and witnesses.

8. Statements are organized into thoughtful and methodical presentations.

9. Appropriate time limits are followed.

10. Student knows when to object, and on what grounds and is able to explain articulately
why objections are made or should be overruled.

High School Mock Trial Rubric - Witnesses

For use in teaching the mock trial process and for evaluating team presentations.

These forms are provided to help teachers and coaches evaluate student learning in the
mock trial process. This rubric is specifically formulated for students who are serving as
mock trial witnesses.
1 - poor 2 - below average 3 - good/average 4 - strong/effective 5 - excellent



1. Students are familiar with all mock trial rules.

2. Students understand the burden of proof.

3. Students are familiar with their witness statement and any additional information
provided in the mock trial packet that is relevant to the case at hand.

4. Student understands that they must respond accurately, within the information in their
witness statement, to questions asked by mock trial attorneys.

5. Appropriate time limits are followed.

6. Student speaks clearly and loudly enough to be heard throughout the room.

7. Student directs comments to the appropriate audience; including judge, jury or witness,
with good eye contact.

8. Student exhibits appropriate courtroom decorum and respect for all parties in the trial,
including opposing counsel and witnesses.

9. Student portrays the witness in a convincing manner, within the rules (i.e., no
costumes, props, dialects or accents).

10. Student can perform the role of witness without use of notes.

More Related Content

What's hot

Testing Grammar
Testing GrammarTesting Grammar
Testing Grammar
songoten77
 
Testing Grammar
Testing GrammarTesting Grammar
Testing Grammar
Myno Uddin
 
Testing Grammar
Testing GrammarTesting Grammar
Testing Grammar
songoten77
 
Writing objective Test Items
Writing objective Test ItemsWriting objective Test Items
Writing objective Test Items
alyn mae valledor
 
TakeaTesttakingTest
TakeaTesttakingTestTakeaTesttakingTest
TakeaTesttakingTest
mcneeteach
 

What's hot (20)

Analysis of Traditional Assessment in the EFL Teaching
Analysis of Traditional Assessment in the EFL TeachingAnalysis of Traditional Assessment in the EFL Teaching
Analysis of Traditional Assessment in the EFL Teaching
 
Writing objective test items
Writing objective test itemsWriting objective test items
Writing objective test items
 
Types of test questions
Types of test questionsTypes of test questions
Types of test questions
 
Item writing in literature
Item writing in literatureItem writing in literature
Item writing in literature
 
english evaluation Language elements
english evaluation Language elementsenglish evaluation Language elements
english evaluation Language elements
 
Item writing
Item writingItem writing
Item writing
 
How to test vocabulary
How to test vocabularyHow to test vocabulary
How to test vocabulary
 
NC EOG Accommodations
NC EOG AccommodationsNC EOG Accommodations
NC EOG Accommodations
 
Designing classroom language tests
Designing classroom language testsDesigning classroom language tests
Designing classroom language tests
 
Testing Grammar
Testing GrammarTesting Grammar
Testing Grammar
 
Testing Grammar
Testing GrammarTesting Grammar
Testing Grammar
 
Testing Grammar
Testing GrammarTesting Grammar
Testing Grammar
 
Completiontestppt
CompletiontestpptCompletiontestppt
Completiontestppt
 
Writing objective Test Items
Writing objective Test ItemsWriting objective Test Items
Writing objective Test Items
 
TakeaTesttakingTest
TakeaTesttakingTestTakeaTesttakingTest
TakeaTesttakingTest
 
Language Assessment reading test in Saudi Arabia
Language Assessment reading test in Saudi ArabiaLanguage Assessment reading test in Saudi Arabia
Language Assessment reading test in Saudi Arabia
 
Assessment tools
Assessment toolsAssessment tools
Assessment tools
 
Completion And Short Answer Items
Completion And Short Answer ItemsCompletion And Short Answer Items
Completion And Short Answer Items
 
Educational Psychology Developing Learners 9th Edition ormrod Test Bank
Educational Psychology Developing Learners 9th Edition ormrod Test BankEducational Psychology Developing Learners 9th Edition ormrod Test Bank
Educational Psychology Developing Learners 9th Edition ormrod Test Bank
 
Appropriateness of Assessment Methods
Appropriateness of Assessment MethodsAppropriateness of Assessment Methods
Appropriateness of Assessment Methods
 

Similar to Mocktrial rubric

Weibin Lin Observation 2
Weibin Lin Observation 2Weibin Lin Observation 2
Weibin Lin Observation 2
Weibin lin
 
Classroom Observation Rating Form for Jessica Mitchell by Heide Temples
Classroom Observation Rating Form for Jessica Mitchell by Heide TemplesClassroom Observation Rating Form for Jessica Mitchell by Heide Temples
Classroom Observation Rating Form for Jessica Mitchell by Heide Temples
Jessica Mitchell
 
The explorer’s project
The explorer’s projectThe explorer’s project
The explorer’s project
todspedding
 
The explorer project
The explorer projectThe explorer project
The explorer project
todspedding
 
The explorer’s project
The explorer’s projectThe explorer’s project
The explorer’s project
todspedding
 
Test formats
Test formatsTest formats
Test formats
Samcruz5
 
Essay Assignment #3Length five to six pagesOn the issue of ge.docx
Essay Assignment #3Length five to six pagesOn the issue of ge.docxEssay Assignment #3Length five to six pagesOn the issue of ge.docx
Essay Assignment #3Length five to six pagesOn the issue of ge.docx
YASHU40
 
EDPT 514 Assessment Strategies for Diverse LearnersAssessmentI
EDPT 514 Assessment Strategies for Diverse LearnersAssessmentIEDPT 514 Assessment Strategies for Diverse LearnersAssessmentI
EDPT 514 Assessment Strategies for Diverse LearnersAssessmentI
EvonCanales257
 

Similar to Mocktrial rubric (20)

Weibin Lin Observation 2
Weibin Lin Observation 2Weibin Lin Observation 2
Weibin Lin Observation 2
 
Classroom Observation Rating Form for Jessica Mitchell by Heide Temples
Classroom Observation Rating Form for Jessica Mitchell by Heide TemplesClassroom Observation Rating Form for Jessica Mitchell by Heide Temples
Classroom Observation Rating Form for Jessica Mitchell by Heide Temples
 
Types of test items
Types of test itemsTypes of test items
Types of test items
 
Chapter 9-METHODS OF DATA COLLECTION
Chapter 9-METHODS OF DATA COLLECTIONChapter 9-METHODS OF DATA COLLECTION
Chapter 9-METHODS OF DATA COLLECTION
 
Tos with test construction sir brai
Tos with test construction sir braiTos with test construction sir brai
Tos with test construction sir brai
 
Assessment presentation final2
Assessment presentation final2Assessment presentation final2
Assessment presentation final2
 
Introduction to Advocacy - Course Outline
Introduction to Advocacy - Course OutlineIntroduction to Advocacy - Course Outline
Introduction to Advocacy - Course Outline
 
The explorer’s project
The explorer’s projectThe explorer’s project
The explorer’s project
 
The explorer project
The explorer projectThe explorer project
The explorer project
 
The explorer’s project
The explorer’s projectThe explorer’s project
The explorer’s project
 
Language Proficiency Assessment :Oral Language
Language Proficiency Assessment :Oral LanguageLanguage Proficiency Assessment :Oral Language
Language Proficiency Assessment :Oral Language
 
Test formats
Test formatsTest formats
Test formats
 
guidelines paper setters for people llllll
guidelines paper setters for people llllllguidelines paper setters for people llllll
guidelines paper setters for people llllll
 
Placement and Achievement Test
Placement and Achievement TestPlacement and Achievement Test
Placement and Achievement Test
 
Testing
TestingTesting
Testing
 
Essay Assignment #3Length five to six pagesOn the issue of ge.docx
Essay Assignment #3Length five to six pagesOn the issue of ge.docxEssay Assignment #3Length five to six pagesOn the issue of ge.docx
Essay Assignment #3Length five to six pagesOn the issue of ge.docx
 
Assessing Oral Abilities
Assessing Oral AbilitiesAssessing Oral Abilities
Assessing Oral Abilities
 
EDPT 514 Assessment Strategies for Diverse LearnersAssessmentI
EDPT 514 Assessment Strategies for Diverse LearnersAssessmentIEDPT 514 Assessment Strategies for Diverse LearnersAssessmentI
EDPT 514 Assessment Strategies for Diverse LearnersAssessmentI
 
Test Taking Strategies That Work For All Students
Test Taking Strategies That Work For All StudentsTest Taking Strategies That Work For All Students
Test Taking Strategies That Work For All Students
 
AP Biology syllabus
AP Biology syllabusAP Biology syllabus
AP Biology syllabus
 

Mocktrial rubric

  • 1. American Legal System Student Name: Mock Trial Rubric 1. Student has a clear understanding of the mock trial rules of procedure. _____ 2. Student has a clear understanding of the burden of proof. _____ 3. Student is able to present information in logical and articulate manner. _____ 4. Student contributes, listen and respect each other. _____ 5. Student understands the steps in the trial. _____ 6. Student participates in class discussions and trial planning. _____ 7. Student understands that they are limited to the materials provided in the mock trial packet. _____ 8. During the trial phase students are dressed appropriately for the trial setting. _____ 9. Students stay focused during class preparation. They stay focused on task and do not have outside conversations that have no relevance to the trial. _____ 10. Student was in class throughout the planning phase and the trial. _____ 0 - poor 5 - below average 10 - good/average 15 - strong/effective 20 - excellent
  • 2. High School Mock Trial Rubric - Attorney Opening/Closing For use in teaching the mock trial process and for evaluating student presentations. These forms are provided to help teachers and coaches evaluate student learning in the mock trial process. This rubric is specifically formulated for students who are assigned the task of crafting and presenting an opening statement or a closing argument. 1 - poor 2 - below average 3 - good/average 4 - strong/effective 5 - excellent 1. Student comprehends the various statements of fact and has a clear idea of the burden of proof. 2. Student provides an accurate synopsis of what needs to be discussed in an opening statement. 3. Student provides an accurate synopsis of what needs to be discussed in a closing argument, and understands that there are limits on what may be included based on what is discussed during the trial. 4. Delivery of opening and/or closing is clear and concise, with minimal reliance on notes. 5. Student speaks clearly and loudly enough to be heard throughout the room. 6. Student directs comments to the appropriate audience; including judge, jury or witness, with good eye contact. 7. Student exhibits appropriate courtroom decorum and respect for all parties in the trial, including opposing counsel and witnesses. 8. Statements are organized into thoughtful and methodical presentations. 9. Appropriate time limits are followed.
  • 3. 10. Students performing closing arguments use appropriate information only and indicate that they listened and understood opposing arguments. High School Mock Trial Rubric - Attorney Direct/Cross For use in teaching the mock trial process and for evaluating student presentations. These forms are provided to help teachers and coaches evaluate student learning in the mock trial process. This rubric is specifically formulated for students who are assigned the task of crafting and presenting an opening statement or a closing argument. 1 - poor 2 - below average 3 - good/average 4 - strong/effective 5 - excellent 1. Student comprehends the various statements of fact and has a clear idea of the burden of proof and is able to establish a foundation for documents. 2. Student develops questions for direct that indicate a clear understanding of the case and how it should be proved. 3. Questions are appropriate for direct or cross, i.e. no leading questions on direct. 4. Delivery of questions on direct and/or cross is clear and concise, with minimal reliance on notes. 5. Student speaks clearly and loudly enough to be heard throughout the room. 6. Student directs comments to the appropriate audience; including judge, jury or witness, with good eye contact. 7. Student exhibits appropriate courtroom decorum and respect for all parties in the trial, including opposing counsel and witnesses. 8. Statements are organized into thoughtful and methodical presentations. 9. Appropriate time limits are followed. 10. Student knows when to object, and on what grounds and is able to explain articulately why objections are made or should be overruled. High School Mock Trial Rubric - Witnesses For use in teaching the mock trial process and for evaluating team presentations. These forms are provided to help teachers and coaches evaluate student learning in the mock trial process. This rubric is specifically formulated for students who are serving as mock trial witnesses.
  • 4. 1 - poor 2 - below average 3 - good/average 4 - strong/effective 5 - excellent 1. Students are familiar with all mock trial rules. 2. Students understand the burden of proof. 3. Students are familiar with their witness statement and any additional information provided in the mock trial packet that is relevant to the case at hand. 4. Student understands that they must respond accurately, within the information in their witness statement, to questions asked by mock trial attorneys. 5. Appropriate time limits are followed. 6. Student speaks clearly and loudly enough to be heard throughout the room. 7. Student directs comments to the appropriate audience; including judge, jury or witness, with good eye contact. 8. Student exhibits appropriate courtroom decorum and respect for all parties in the trial, including opposing counsel and witnesses. 9. Student portrays the witness in a convincing manner, within the rules (i.e., no costumes, props, dialects or accents). 10. Student can perform the role of witness without use of notes.