3. All roads to a welfare state pass through
economic growth
“There are no examples of countries improving the welfare of
their populations without growth”
-- World Economic Forum: The Global Competitiveness Report, 17-18
3
“Redistribution, as distinct from Growth, cannot be the answer to
removing poverty”
-- “How Economic Growth in India Reduced Poverty and Lessons for other Developing
Countries,” Jagdish Bhagwati and Arvind Pangariya
4. But the right kind of growth, which
happens through productivity increase
"Second, shift Pakistan’s growth policy from the failed import-led strategies towards
policies that focus squarely on raising domestic productivity growth and exports ...
One of the most important lessons for students of economic growth is that a
country’s long-term growth is almost exclusively a function of its domestic
productivity growth. In plain words, a country cannot buy success from the outside,
success has to be developed internally ... Invest in science, technology and
human capital infrastructure.”
-- Atif Mian, Fixing Pakistan’s Financial Woes
4
5. Productivity increase is driven by
technology and innovation …
"Rather than static discussions over the size of the deficit, there must be more
debate about its actual composition; how to invest strategically in key areas, such
as research and development, education and human capital formation, that will
increase gross domestic product in the future (bringing the debt/GDP ratio down as
a consequence); and how to engage in a debate about the direction of change so
that such investments will lead to growth that is not only smarter (innovation-led)
but also more inclusive and sustainable.”
-- Mariana Mazucatto, Economist, author of The Entrepreneurial State: Debunking public vs. private
sector myths
5
The State must direct the economy
towards new techno-economic paradigms.
-- Carlota Perez, Centennial Professor at the London
School of Economics
6. … particularly in developing countries
In lagging countries, political and social norms impede the spread
of technology -- bad rules, old ways of thinking and self imposed
limitations.
-- Paul Romer, awarded Nobel Prize in Economics in 2018 for “for integrating technological
innovations into long-run macroeconomic analysis” and having “immense impact on global
policy making.”
6
7. Large firms that can compete globally …
7
McKinsey, 2018:
"Large competitive firms propel outperforming economies. On average, these economies
have twice as many companies with revenue over $500 million as other emerging economies.
Top firms in emerging economies are more innovative, aggressive in their investment
strategies, nimbler in allocating resources and prioritize growth outside their home markets.”
"Governments also collaborated with the private sector to co-create solutions in multiple
areas, including infrastructure, technology, and financial services. Firms in many of the
outperforming economies face fewer regulatory and tax barriers compared with companies in
other countries, and this in turn encourages business creation and improved efficiency.
Outperformer governments have used pilot programs and experiments to test new ideas in a
variety of contexts, modifying and updating them as necessary and then scaling up policies that
work.”
8. .. with support of the state as visionary, risk
taker, investor and enabler
Policy
Up
stream
HR R&D Innovate
Incentive
&
Regulate
Cross
Industry
Demand
Creation
HYUNDAI:
STEEL RE-
ROLLING
POLYMER FOR
AUTO
RESEARCHERS &
VOCATIONAL
TRAINING
CHINA: AI,
ROBOTICS
USA PHARMA:
ORPHAN DRUGS
USA: DOD, NSF,
DARPA, NASA
CHINA: TORCH
INDIA: STARTUP
PACKAGE 2015
ISRAEL: YOZMA
MALAYSIA:
MAVCAP
CHINA: CLEAN
TECH
ELON MUSK: $4.9
BILLION
JAPAN, INC
USA: NANO,
SEMATECH
APPLE,
SONY,
TOYOTA
APPLE: SBA
GRANT
GOOGLE: NSF
GRANT
G-G, G-B unified platform to
provide real time monitoring,
analytics/AI, adaptation and
course correction
Requite HR being produced?
Innovation trajectory correct?
Incentive providing desired
result?
Editor's Notes
https://www.dawn.com/news/1427514/fixing-pakistans-financial-woes
"First, strengthen Pakistan’s financial and regulatory authorities.Third, modernise the financial system in order to reduce the incidence of tax evasion and money laundering.
In my view—and that of most contemporary economists, I believe—Schumpeter’s most original and most lastingly significant book was Theory of Economic Development, which appeared in 1911 (and was translated into English in 1934). It was at the University of Czernowitz, not far from the beginning of his career as an economist, that he worked out his conception of the entrepreneur,the maker of “new combinations,” as the driving force and characteristic figure of the fits-and-starts evolution of the capitalist economy. He was explicit that, while technological innovation was in the long run the most important function of the entrepreneur, organizational innovation in governance, finance, and management was comparable in significance.
I think that this is Schumpeter’s main legacy to economics: the role of technological and organizational innovation in driving and shaping the growth trajectory of capitalist economies.
It is possible to see Keynesian and Schumpeterian ideas as complementary. Keynes is about short-run economic fluctuations brought about by erratic variations in the willingness of investors and governments to spend; Schumpeter is about the long-run trajectory driven by the erratic march of technological progress. This complementarity only became clear later, after both men had died, when economic growth became an explicit objective of public policy and topic of systematic analysis. Schumpeter was left frustrated by the younger generation’s affinity for his rival. In any case, the “preliminary volume” never materialized.
The world turns. Today, some sixty years after their deaths, Schumpeter’s star probably outshines Keynes’s. The business cycle has receded in importance, partly because the large industrial economies have sprouted a more stable structure, and partly because the lessons that Keynes taught have been learned by central banks and finance ministries. Instead, long-term economic growth has moved to the top of the political and intellectual agenda, and that was Schumpeter’s topic. As Robert Lucas memorably put it, once you have begun to think about economic growth, it is hard to think about anything else. It is a pity that troubled old Schumpeter did not live to see the triumph of his obsession.
Robert Solow