Consequences Of Deception In Romeo And Juliet

Consequences Of Deception In Romeo And Juliet
"Never attempt to win by force what can be won by deception." вЂ• NiccolГІ Machiavelli. The term deception takes a part in betraying another for
one's self interest. It was a key element within Shakespeare's work. Romeo and Juliet is one of the prime examples of this topic. They showed
deception very clearly by hiding their actions and betraying their families, leading to their tragic ending. However, it was not the only piece
Shakespeare wrote that showed the multiple consequences caused by an act of betrayal. The power of deception and the consequences that follow is
a staple in literature, and no one shows this idea more clearly than Shakespeare. "Oh! What A Tangled Web We Weave When First We Practice To
Deceive" –Sir Walter Scott. Shakespeare is one of the most celebrated authors in history, weaving deception throughout his writings. As he wrote
about love, deception was seen over and over within his pieces. An example of Shakespeare's work is from Sonnet 138, "O, love's best habit is in
seeming trust." This sonnet was based around a man and his mistress. The man knows that she lies about being faithful, but he also is aware that they
do it in order to protect each other and their relationship. Later in Sonnet 157, the audience sees the outcome of the deception in Sonnet 138, as they
are told that the man and his mistress are no longer. In the story of Romeo and Juliet, Romeo quotes, "O, how may I call this lightning? O my love! My
wife! Death, that hath suck'd the honey
... Get more on HelpWriting.net ...

Essay on Rewriting History in Henry IV
Rewriting History in Henry IV
The master of historiography is, perhaps, Shakespeare as evidenced by his History Plays. Whereas most writers merely borrow from history to fuel
their creative fires, Shakespeare goes so far as to rewrite history. The First Part of Henry the Fourth follows history fairly closely, and Shakespeare
draws this history primarily from Raphael Holinshed's Chronicle of England, Scotland, and Ireland and from Samuel Daniel's verse epic The Civil Wars
(Abrams 823).
The play opens shortly after Henry Bolingbroke has usurped the throne from Richard II, becoming the fourth King Henry, and changing the royal
lineage from the House of Plantagenet to the House of Lancaster. In the opening ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For the most part, Shakespeare did indeed fabricate Falstaff, Poins, and the whole Tavern Group, yet historical evidence does support some sort of
provincial getaway. McFarlane records that in 1412 the younger Henry "remained dissatisfied [with his father] and shortly afterwards withdrew once
more into the provinces, where he was soon again at his old tricks" (110). Shakespeare originally named the character of Falstaff after the Protestant
martyr John Oldcastle. Shakespeare eventually bowed to the objections of Oldcastle's descendants, renaming the character (Abrams 823).
At the Battle of Shrewsbury, Shakespeare describes how Hal kills Hotspur, eulogizes him (5.4.78–102), and then concedes the victory of the kill to
Falstaff (5.4.138–50). History records that Hal himself suffered an arrow–shot to the face (Rowse 44) and that no one knows for certain who killed
Hotspur (Jacob 52–3). History further records that, as for the eulogy, it was the king who shed tears over Hotspur's slain figure, not the young prince
(Rowse 45). Despite Hotspur being three years older than Hal's father (Hotspur died at age thirty–nine) (Rowse 44), Shakespeare paints the portrait of
Hotspur and Hal as contemporaries, following poet Daniel's lead (Drabble 475). Rowse does note, however, that Shakespeare did capture the essence
in Hotspur of "something not grown–up about this fighting man, who

Character Analysis Of Much Ado About Nothing, By William...
Around the world, Shakespeare's works are read and analysed. His plays are sorted into four categories: Comedies, Histories, Tragedies and
Romances. "Much Ado About Nothing", by William Shakespeare, demonstrates the characteristics recurrent in elizabethan tragedies, despite being
considered a comedy. These significant elements include: a villain, death, and a tragic love story. To begin, a Shakespearean villain is stereotyped as:
an outsider, someone who feels the need for revenge, and someone who spends time plotting his evil actions. All of these elements can be found within
Much Ado About Nothing's Don John. Illegitimate brother of Don Pedro, a nobleman from "Aragon", Don John is certainly an outsider. Other
characters even call him... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"Any bar, any cross, any impediment will be medicinable to me [...] How canst thou cross this marriage." (Act 2. Scene 2. 3–6) This quote shows Don
John plotting his villainous plan to disrupt the love of Claudio and Hero. Don John is undouptably a Shakespearean villain that complements the
other elements of this tragedy. Furthermore, William includes the element of death in his tragedies. In Much Ado About Nothing, death is often
exaggerated and superficial. In Act 4, Scene 1, Claudio slanders Hero at the altar and Leonato has a desire to die. "Hath no man's daggar here a
point for me?" (Act 4. Scene 1. 105) Death, at this moment is an exaggerated desire. Leonato feels so ashamed and embarrassed that he wants to
die. Consequently, after the slandering, Hero, falls to the ground. Beatrice rushes to her side and calls out that Hero is dead. Hero is not actually
dead, though the topic of death is superficial in this case. Hero can not handle the slandering and the fact that her own father would not believe her.
Afterwards, the friar devises a plan that involves death. His goal is to clear Hero's name. The friar explains " Let her awhile be secretly kept in, and
publish it that she is dead indeed" (Act 4. Scene 1. 199–200) Death is again being used but this time it is for deception. The friar continues "She dying,
as it must so be maintained, upon the instant that she was accused, shall be lamented, pitied, and excused."(Act 4. Scene 1. 211–213) The false death

Women's Role in Shakespearean Tragedy
In Shakespeare's tragedies and his plays in general, we can come across several types of female characters. Their influence with other characters and
their purpose or role, often underestimated like women themselves, will be this essay's main subject.Women in Shakespearean plays have always had
important roles, sometimes even the leading role. Whether they create the main conflicts and base of the plays, or bring up interesting moral and
cultural questions, they have always been put in challenging situations. Some women are stronger than others, and their effect on the play is different
for each one. They often even surpass the male heroes. It's almost unbelieveable, if we take into consideration the status of women, of course with...
Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Only transgressing the patriarchal bounds of femininity by marrying so soon after her husband's death and not remaining in passive grief makes her
"strong" but grim indeed. This provides Hamlet with a model of women's inconstancy ("Frailty, thy name is woman."). On the other hand in the
portrayal of unstable Ophelia Shakespeare shows how men in a strong patriarchal society controlled women in the 1600s. The influence of men in
Ophelia's life is evident throughout by the relationships with men in her life. It is interesting to note that Ophelia's first scene is in a very domestic
setting. She is influenced and controlled by those around her, and unable to express her deep feelings because of their control. Actually she suffers as a
result of Hamlet's patriarchal values of womanhood. Ophelia's subsequent madness and eventual suicide (so typical sign of the classical tragedy) came
as a result of the pressure and control her father and the king had over her. At her father's death she lost her identity completely, and along with that her
sanity. But she has a major influence on Hamlet, and his return to sanity, despite the fact, she is a victim.
Juliet is given similar personality in another Shakespeare's tragic play, "Romeo and Juliet". Again it explores the effects of patriarchal authority exerted
over women and the responses to it. Through heroine Juliet, Lady Capulet, and the Nurse, Shakespeare establishes a common understanding of this
type of society, and

William Shakespeare Research Paper
William Shakespeare has proved to be an important staple of the English language and modern literature. Shakespeare brought life to a monotonous
time period using his writing talent.Through his life experiences and many accomplishments, William Shakespeare has brought entertainment through
his many works, and forever changed the world of theater and storytelling.
When England was facing hard times, Shakespeare brought life to this era with his entertaining plays, poems, and enchanting stories. Shakespeare
brought new ideas of literature that had never been tested and brought a huge change in the world of drama. Being one of the first men to work modern
language into his dramas, William Shakespeare brought a growth in the popularity in ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
William Shakespeare has changed the English language and education. He has been credited with many books that are still studied and enjoyed
by all ages. Shakespeare has also brought a new change in technology and modern culture. The works of William Shakespeare include elements
that are both modern and traditional. His literature embodies an important educational foundation for adolescents. Lots of youth lack the
knowledge of the importance of Shakespearean studies. The study of his classical and contemporary work helps in comprehending literature in
our present culture. Shakespeare contributed in creating different forms of vocabulary and grammar that are still in common use centuries later.
Words such as "amazement," "dislocate," "premeditated," and "dexterously" were all created by Shakespeare. Shakespeare is also coined with
creating modern day sayings and suffixes. Many different phrases such as "all's well that ends well" and "break the ice" were all used in
Shakespeare's different stories and poems. He also began the use of new suffixes such as "ship," "de," and "ous." Very few modern authors possess
the talent to create their own new form of language as Shakespeare often did. Shakespeare has greatly changed our modern society in a positive way
and impacted our ways of life and has been judged greatly throughout

The Tragedy Of Macbeth By William Shakespeare
If three crazy old ladies walked up to you and told you would be king would you trust them? Macbeth did and ultimately it led to his tragic demise.
The tragedy of Macbeth was written by famous poet William Shakespeare in the earl sixteen hundredth. The play dramatizes the destructive physical
and mental effects of radical ambition for people who seek authority for the benefit of an individual. Macbeth's theme of ambition, lust for power, faith,
and gullibility makes Macbeth his own antagonist, which is directly correlated to his death. But which factor contributed the most to his tragic end? By
comparing different Genre of Plays, will help understand this question. Throughout The Tragedy of Macbeth, Macbeth is constantly deciding whether
or not his action are justifiable. As a result of his mental battle throughout Shakespeare's play, the demeaning mental consciousness of unrestrained
ambition can be seen as one of the main themes the tragedy of Macbeth. These themes of ambition can be seen throughout many parts of Act 1 as the
play progresses.
My thought, whose murder yet is but fantastical,
Shakes so my single state of man
That function is smothered in surmise,
And nothing is but what is not. (Macbeth)
You can see from this quote that Macbeth ambition convinces him that murder is okay. Even though the witches did not say anything about murder, the
fact that Macbeth's first thought was to kill the innocent and well renowned King Duncan in hopes of becoming king is

The Difference Between Shakespearean And Aristotelian Tragedy
Tragedies across Time
In our modern language, the word "tragedy" has become a word that describes mundane incidents that are negative. At the most, a tragedy is used
describe horrific event that involves severe misfortune; however, when comes to the theatre term, the definition of tragedy is much more specific then
the modern use of the word. In essence, a tragedy depending on the time and place was used to tell the tale of tragic hero and the flaw that contributed
his eventual downfall. Unfortunately, this too simple of an answer. Shakespearean and Aristotelian tragedy are the most widely excepted forms of
theatric tragedy, yet their execution and their method of exposition have major difference which greatly effects the interpretation of the story.
To understand the differences between Shakespearean and Aristotelian tragedy, first it is important to understand each style individually. Starting first
with the oldest form, Aristotelian Tragedy, the key of understanding is to understand its origins. B.L. Ullman, the mention of tragedy by Aristotle in his
book, Poetic, as he explains the fundamental differences between tragedy and history. This is where the bases for Greek tragedy came forth. For
Aristotle, tragedy was the following:
"Tragedy, then, is an imitation of an action that is serious, complete, and of a certain magnitude; in language embellished with each kind of artistic
ornament, the several kinds being found in separate parts of the play; in the form of

Roles Of Women In Sir Gawain And The Green Knight
Roles of Women What if women never established rights? The world would not be the place it is today if that was the case. Women are able to do
just as much as men if not more.Women were regarded as "the weaker sex", not just in terms of physical strength, but emotionally too. The fact that
women were not treated equally was wrong in many ways, but that was the way of life during those times. In the British culture, from the
Anglo–Saxon, the men were respected on a higher level than women, and women were to always be subservient to men, which were demonstrated
throughout many works of literature. To point out, women unlike men had a more submissive role in the Anglo–Saxon era. In the story Sir Gawain and
the Green Knight shows a woman that is seductive toward a man, which is not her husband, but only because her husband orders her to. Thus
validating that men had the authority over their women. In the poem this is proven to be when, "The lovely lady came laughing sweetly, / Fell over
his fair face and fondly kissed him; / Sir Gawain welcomed her worthily and with pleasure; He found her so glorious, so attractively dressed, so
faultless in every feature, her colors so fine" (Line 200–220). The Lady is trying to seduce Sir Gawain, but he rightfully declines her offer. The fact that
The Lady is looking so pleased and she is kissing him, that does not seem to interfere with the way Sir Gawain feels about her at that moment. Sir
Gawain encounters multiple uncomfortable situations with The Lady when: "For that priceless princess pressed us here so hard... And drove him so
close to the line that she left him no choice... But to take the full pleasure she offered but refuses her. (Line 240) Sir Gawain did not want to sleep
with The Lady because he did not want to violate the chivalric code. During that time period, men and women had to obey the chivalric code, which
was a system of ideas and social codes governing the behavior of knights and gentlewomen. Chivalry brought about an idealized attitude toward
women, but it did little to improve their actual position. The chivalric code brought a certain level of respect to the women of that time; even though it
did not necessarily change their positions in

William Shakespeare: Greatest Playwright of All
William Shakespeare: Greatest Playwright of All
William Shakespeare (1564–1616) was a British poet and playwright, he was well known as the greatest writer of all time, he was often called the
"Bard of Avon".Although many facts of his life remain unknown, his poems and plays are unique and have timeless theme that touch everyone's heart,
and are still widely studied and performed in today's society. During the reign of Queen Elizabeth I, England enjoyed a time of prosperity and stability
that led to a new era for England. Shakespeare's works epitomize arts of the Elizabethan Epoch; through his uses of beautiful and poetic language,
iambic pentameter is nearly always used in his style of poetry. Shakespeare wrote about timeless themes about ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net
...
When the Globe was built, He worked for the Lord Chamberlain's Men, and was also part owner of the Globe itself.
People in Elizabethan England were very concerned with the humour, which was a form of medicine and psychology. Shakespeare makes references to
them all over in his plays. Hamlet is portrayed as being to Melancholic, with his humours out of balance, and one was dominant over the others. This
is not psychology as we know it today, and was why the people from Elizabethan Era believed people were the way they were. Shakespeare used this
belief to make his characters not only believable, but also understandable to his audience.
Shakespeare's works are the greatest representation of art from Elizabethan England politically, economically, and socially. No other art form, including
painting, could provide so much information about life in Elizabethan England, we can see the ideas, thoughts, languages, customs, etc throughout his
plays.
Shakespeare wrote 154 sonnets and 37 plays in total, including tragedy, comedy, and history. The Four Great Tragedies were his greatest achievement
as a playwright, and are greatly studied in English literature, performed in theatre, and made into several films; include Romeo and Juliet (1594), the
timeless tale of young lovers whose names were synonymous with star–crossed romance; Hamlet (1600), the revenge drama centering on the
introspective Prince of Denmark; Othello (1604), a story of

Overview of Macbeth
Not surprisingly, Macbeth has received volumes of critical commentary over the years. Not only is the play an audience favorite, but its complex
characterization, deeply woven themes, and characteristic Shakespearean style make it rich ground for scholarly inquiry. Critics such as Harold Bloom
have remarked on the importance of Macbeth in the context of Shakespeare 's works. In Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human, Bloom writes, '
'The rough magic in Macbeth is wholly Shakespeare 's; he indulges his own imagination as never before, seeking to find its moral limits (if any). ' '
Bloom also remarks, ' 'Macbeth is an uncanny unity of setting, plot, and characters, fused together beyond comparison with any other play of
Shakespeare 's. ' ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
' ' As evidence, he notes how, although she is a strong character, Lady Macbeth is onstage very little; and readers do not have the chance to get to
know other characters, such as Duncan, Malcolm, Banquo, and Macduff very well.
Although the minor characters appear only briefly (usually because they are murdered) and their personas are not fully developed, readers and
critics are drawn to them. Duncan, for example, is held up as an example of a good king in contrast to Macbeth 's figure as a bad king. Van Doren
remarks, ' 'Duncan was everything that Macbeth is not. We saw him briefly, but the brilliance of his contrast with the thane he trusted has kept his
memory beautiful throughout a play whose every other feature has been hideous. ' ' Similarly, Lady Macduff and her son appear fleetingly, but their
fate evokes the pity of the audience and rouses more indignation toward Macbeth.
A substantial body of criticism addresses Lady Macbeth. Her importance in the play and her position as a dominant woman in Western literature have
prompted lengthy discussion and character evaluation. Ribner juxtaposes Lady Macbeth with Banquo in her role in Macbeth 's psychological makeup.
He maintains that while Banquo represents the part of Macbeth 's divided nature that would ' 'accept nature and reject evil, ' ' Lady Macbeth represents
the other

Essay On The Tragedy Of King Lear
Up until the mid–point of his career, Shakespeare divided his plays between the three major genres: Comedy, Tragedy, and History. The tragic genre is
perhaps the oldest genre in literature, dating back to the ancient Greeks. It started with the ancient Greek celebrations of Dionysus, the god of wine and
fertility. The very simple plot of atragedy involves a protagonist who desires something which could be a lover, power, wealth, authority, and obstacles
come in his way as he reaches its fulfillment. However, After undergoing a series of challenges, the protagonist does not overcome the obstacles, which
eventually lead to his downfall and destroy him. That is apparent in the Shakespearean Tragedy as tragedy does not only mean death or calamity, ...
The full title of the play itself The Tragedy of King Lear puts the play in the tragic genre. As with all tragedies, there exists atragic hero, one who
possesses a fatal flaw that initiates the tragedy and all the sufferings that follow. King Lear, king of England, would be the tragic hero because he
held the highest position in the social chain at the very beginning of the play. His social position gave him pride as he remarked himself as
"Jupiter" and "Apollo". Moreover, according to the definition of a tragic hero, one must be born into nobility, endowed with a tragic flaw, fail to
judge, fall from great heights, being aware that they have made an inevitable mistake, and faces and accepts death with honor. King Lear meets all
of these qualities. King Lear was a tragic hero that was born into nobility, endowed with a tragic flaw and fails as he makes a serious mistake in
judgement. "He owned vast amounts of land and ruled over many people. Give me the map there. know that we have divided In three our Kingdom."
The plot is driven by the power and consequence of losses, more specifically, the losses of King Lear. Throughout the play, because of his flaws,
King Lear loses his authority as a king, his identity as a father, and his sanity as a man. One loss becomes related to one another. Moreover, his
greatest loss, and what

Essay about William Shakespeare's Relevance Today
William Shakespeare's Relevance Today
For as long as formal education has existed in Britain it has been a largely standard assumption that teaching the works of William Shakespeare is
relevant and necessary. Perhaps the relevance of his writing is taken for granted, perhaps it is necessary to re–examine the role of Shakespeare for the
modern audience. There are indeed many people who question the relevance of this 440 year old playwright to a 21st century audience, taking it
even as far as perhaps the greatest heresy of all, questioning the necessity of GCSE pupils learning Shakespeare at all. This "proposed vandalism from
the policymakers" (Guardian 09/02/01) is opposed wholesale by supporters ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
"Each play of Shakespeare is the development of a metaphor or group of metaphors. There is a matrix out of which feeling finds words, emotions take
shape and voices become characters. That which is referred to most often– in metaphors, images, allusions and statements– is usually for Shakespeare
what is significant"
(Rehder 1980 p56)
However simply because the theme is, arguably, not reliant on the context or overall setting, and that this theme is relayed by metaphor and not in
descriptive prose, is not perhaps justified cause to say that the theme itself will necessarily be relevant; or indeed that the metaphorical vehicle by
which it is conveyed will be relevant or appreciable either. For example one of the more central themes of King Lear, as with all the tragedies, is death.
Death as a theme can be said to have starkly contrasting meaning and therefore perhaps relevance for a modern audience as compared to a
Shakespearean one. Today death is a rare and terrible tragedy of momentous importance in the life of an individual, in 16th century England with its
plagues, starvation, infant mortality and state violence; death was

Existentialism In Hamlet
Hamlet is widely regarded as one of William Shakespeare's most famous and best–written tragedies. Its importance to history, due in part to the fact that
the introspection of the main character upon his dilemmas was rarely addressed in other popular plays, is felt to this day. Similar to the likes of Romeo
and Juliet, Macbeth, Julius Caesar, Othello, King Lear, and other Shakespearean tragedies, it has been the subject of much critical analysis and literary
review from many approaches. In this essay, the historic, existentialist, traditional revenge tragedy, psychoanalytic, and archetypal approaches will be
used to understand the tragedy of Hamlet. The time period in which the play was written is known as either the English Renaissance or the Early
Modern Era. The existence of both names seems to prove that Hamlet was penned in a period of transition for England, and the characters within the
tragedy all but confirm this conjecture. Hamlet, the titular character, represents the modern half of the transition, acquiring an education from a city
where the transition was most prominent, while Claudius represents the medieval half, claiming and subsequently abusing the traditional position of
king through means of betrayal and secrecy (Bernath 220). The time period also suggests that the introspection of the main character upon his
dilemma's in such a way as to question his own existence initially had an incredible resonance with audiences, as such commentary on the human

Violence and Its Forms
Violence was, and remains today, a versatile concept in theatre. Violence is something we desire to see as an audience, yet simultaneously a majority
of people would never commit the atrocities found in "Macbeth." There exists a thin line between acceptable violence and violence that turns an
audience away from sympathizing with a character. In this essay we will evaluate the differences between the various forms of violence found within "
Macbeth," and analyze why the audience can accept some acts of violence, while deeming others inhumane. The clearest breeds of violence found in
the play are; war violence, law breaking violence, sociopathic violence, and descriptive violence. Shakespeare places these different forms of violence
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
And even now,
To crown my thoughts with acts, be it thought and done:
The castle of Macduff I will surprise,
Seize upon Fife, give to th' edge o' th' sword
His wife, his babes, and all unfortunate souls
That trace him in his line. No boasting like a fool.
(IV.i.1726–1733)
Macbeth addresses the difference between fantasy and actuality. Shakespeare may have been suggesting that it is a human element to have demons for
daydreams and that it is part of the human consciousness to fantasize horrible acts such as murdering for power, but that it is only unheavenly violence
when these thoughts are acted upon.
War violence is the most publically accepted form of violence. Macbeth is introduced as a courageous man because he was able to win the war for the
Scottish.
For brave Macbeth–well he deserves that name–
Disdaining fortune, with his brandish'd steel,
Which smoked with bloody execution,
Like valour's minion carved out his passage
Till he faced the slave;

Which ne'er shook hands, nor bade farewell to him,
Till he unseam'd him from the nave to the chaps,
And fix'd his head upon our battlements.
(I.ii.35–42)
The play "Macbeth" is introduced with violence, but unlike the violence that follows this battle, the future gore is unacceptable. Macbeth is explained
to have cut a man from his navel to his jaw, and then place his head on a castle wall. As violent as this is, it is the only act Macbeth does in the entire
play that is noble. The opening

King Lear : A Shakespearean Shakespearian Tragedy
The play King Lear is what is known as a Shakespearian tragedy. All that this means is that it was written by Shakespeare, possibly one of the most
famous playwrights in history, and that the play is considered to fit into the category of a tragedy. A tragedy can be simply described as a play with
an unhappy ending. Shakespeare wrote a number of tragedies, and readers of the plays debate which tragedies were the best. King Lear is certainly a
well–known tragedy, but should it be counted as one of the best? Should it be considered one of Shakespeare's four greatest tragedies? Many people
do regard it as one of the best Shakespeare tragedies, but it generally comes down to opinion. In order to determine the best Shakespeare tragedy, it has
to be stacked up against other well–known Shakespearian tragedies like Macbeth, Othello, Julius Caesar, Romeo and Juliet, Antony and Cleopatra,
and Hamlet in multiple ways, both objectively and subjectively. When compared to these plays, it is evident that King Lear should not be counted as
one of the top four Shakespearian tragedies on account of three things, its popularity in relation to the other tragedies, its character development in
relation to the other tragedies, and the clarity of its overall message compared to the other tragedies. This is not to say that King Lear is a poorly
written play, just that although it is great in its own right, it does not deserve to be in the top four Shakespearian tragedies of all time list; other

Essay on Justice vs. Morality in Measure for Measure and...
Justice vs. Morality in Measure for Measure and Merchant of Venice
There are many similarities shared between Shakespeare's plays, "Measure for Measure", and "The Merchant of Venice". The underlying theme of
each work is well defined by the phrase "Justice without the temperance of mercy, is power misused". I will support this claim by drawing upon some of
the characters and situations that are consistent in each story.
In each story a man's life depends on the interpretation, and sanctioning of justice. In the, "Merchant of Venice", Antonio (who I believe represents
mercy), had sealed a bond with Shylock offering a pound of his flesh for the loan of three thousand ducats. Unfortunately he forfeits this bond,
(Merchant ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
For Antonio it was his love of Bassanio and his strong desire to see him prosper, (Merchant I,i) "... My purse, my person, my extremist means, Lie all
unlock'd to your occasions.". Cladio too acted out of love and devotion to the woman he meant for his wife, yet didn't hold the papers for.
In both situations cases are made not necessarily to debunk justice, however instead to allow for judgment interwoven with mercy. For Antonio's
sake Portia (acting as Balthazar), offers Shylock a plea of humanity, (Merchant IV,i) "The quality of mercy is not strain'd,... 'Tis mightiest in the
mightiest... It is enthroned in the heart of kings, It is an attribute to God himself...", yet none of this causes Shylock to sway from his original
position, (Merchant IV,i) "My deeds upon my head! I crave the law, The penalty and forfeit of my bond.". In, "Measure for Measure" it was Isabella
attempting to soften the heart of Angelo, (Measure II,ii) "... Go to your bosom, Knock there, and ask your heart what it doth know That's like my
brother's fault...". Now the plot in this story is much thicker, and Angelo had another agenda (i.e.. getting Isabella in bed), her plea's ended with the
same result as those of Portia, (Measure II,iv) "Nay, but hear me, Your sense pursues not mine...", "Then must your brother die".
In both situations there is a strong, and legitimate case for either argument. On the one hand you have

What Is The Theme Of Honour In Othello
Discussing Shakespeare has always been an inspiring issue. But dealing with the issue of honour in his works is even a more challenging matter. The
aim of this thesis is to prove that honour has been treated in Shakespeare tragedies as a key point which leads into his tragedies. Even though it is dealt
with it under dissimilar names, the consequences are the same. In three of his tragedies Hamlet, Othello and Romeo and Juliet honour is displayed as a
main theme and at the same time as a driving force, usually for the worse. Honour has been analysed as the same problem but with different features.
All the main characters of these tragedises kill in the name of honour. nonetheless Hamlet kills to avenge his father`s death, Othello kills to purify ...
In this thesis, there will be dealt with honour in three of Shakespeare's tragedies: Hamlet, Othello and Romeo and Juliet. The aim of this thesis is to
deal with honour not as a positive contributor but as a destructive element. Because in the three tragedies we will analyse honour has been the triger
towards vengeance. In the writing of this thesis consulting many Shakespearean scholars has been necessary and vital. One of the main ones is
Harold Bloom. Bloom has a deep appreciation for Shakespeare (Bloom 1994, pp. 2–3) and considers him to be the supreme center of the Western
Canon. (Bloom 1994, pp. 24–5). He has written numeral works regarding different aspects of Shakespeare as a playwright. In 1998 Bloom conducted
a survey named "Shakespeare: The Invention of the Human." In this survey Bloom provides a detailed analysis of each of Shakespeare's 38 plays,
"twenty–four of which are masterpieces." (Bloom, 1998). Since it is written as a companion to the general reader and theatergoer, Bloom states that
bardolatry "ought to be even more a secular religion than it already is. (Bloom,

A Comparison of Hamlet and Mcmurphy in "One Flew over the...
A Comparison of Hamlet and McMurphy in "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest"
It is suggested that in modern literature, the true element of tragedy is not captured because the protagonist is often of the same social status as the
audience, and therefor, his downfall is not tragic. This opinion, I find, takes little consideration of the times in which we live. Indeed, most modern
plays and literature are not about monarchs and the main character is often equal to the common person; this, however, does not mean the plot is any
less miserable nor the outcome any less wretched. The first work I have chosen proves this fact. One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest, a first novel by
Ken Kesey published in 1962, is a contemporary tragedy describing ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
He was the logger again, the swaggering gambler, the big redheaded brawling Irishman, the cowboy out of the TV set walking to me a dare."
The common theme in each plot is a rise against tyranny in defense of one's honor to defeat the evil repressor. Despite their different methods, it was
the eventuality of revenge that drove Hamlet and McMurphy onward to the brutal end of it all. Although McMurphy disguises it with ignorance and
Hamlet flaunts it in his wit, another striking resemblance is the aptitude of these two characters.
A consequential parallel between them is also their use of this intellect to set and trap the other characters. McMurphy does this with interest in
personal gain, as he often maneuvers the other patients into betting against him when unbeknownst to them, the odds are in McMurphy's favor:
"He let the odds stack up, and sucked them in deeper and deeper till he had five to one on a sure thing from every man of them, some of them betting
up to twenty dollars." Hamlet as well manipulates for personal gain, though his is not monetary. He plots to fulfill he need for absolute certainty; his, is
a plot for information.
Certainly, the best example of this, is the influence Hamlet uses on the play staged by the traveling theater company. His insistence the players perform
"The Murder of Gonzago", a show that eerily shadows the method used by Claudius
himself

Hamlet, Prince of Denmark
Hamlet, Prince of Denmark
By William Shakespeare
Submitted by: Tariq Khan
Dated: Monday, 24th September, 2012
Hamlet as a Tragedy by William Shakespeare
1.1. Brief Introduction to Tragedy: Greek and English:
Elizabethan tragedy is traced back to Greek tragedy, since Greeks are said to have pioneered the Western knowledge, be it Science, Arts, or
Humanities–not necessarily Technology. The rich contribution of Greek dramatists like Sophocles, Euripides, Aeschylus and Aristophanes, is
noteworthy, towards the development of both Roman and English Drama. Though Roman Drama could not thrive much as to invite the attention of
Western audience, but English Drama excelled in Elizabethan Age (due to the royal patronage), with... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
On the other hand, Shakespearean tragedy radiates with strong characterization–round, of course–"Character is Destiny". Sixthly, Pity and Fear for
Catharsis are perhaps common in both the tradition of tragedies. And, lastly, the role of chorus (highlighting the past and intimating the future–pivotal
to the plot), being common in Greek and English Tragedies, make them closer to each other. 1.2.William Shakespeare's Hamlet:
Hamlet by William Shakespeare is believed to be the Crown of Tragedies because of its thematic heterogeneity, stylistic features, rich characterization
and appeal to Human Heart. A heart rending tragedy that overwhelms with revenge, filial love and introspection–explicitly exposed in four major
Soliloquies by Hamlet, the prince. The said drama is equally fascinating to the students of history, philosophy, psychology, literature and perhaps many
more. Though, it has flaws in its plot being unsystematic and less causative for the fulfilment of Organic Whole, yet the overall/final effect is quite
impressive from artistic and literary viewpoints.
Speeches of Polonius, Ophelia, Horatio, Claudius, and particularly the Hamlet's glorify the drama; better illustrates and beautifies the tragedy, fulfilling
the fundamentals of tragedy. Every character contributes, shares and cares, and above all, involved in the main action–action being the soul of drama!
Internal and External Conflicts

The Relationship Between Richard II and The Myrroure for...
The Relationship Between Richard II and The Myrroure for Magistrates
The relationship between Richard II and The Myrroure for Magistrates is considered here predominantly in the context of the differences between the
two texts.[1] The function of each text is discussed initially, the didactic purpose of the Myrroure contrasted with the function of Shakespeare's play as,
primarily, theatrical entertainment. The conflicting accounts of certain events from Richard's reign are looked at subsequently and the manner in
which they reflect the different function of the texts. Finally, consideration is given to the different way in which the Myrroure andRichard II each
reflect upon the theme of kingship ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
His message can be contradictory, for he does see his murder as 'causeles' (l. 116) and his opponents as 'traytrous' (l. 114). Yet the overwhelming
force of his own argument is that his reign was characterised by 'vices' (ll. 2 & 34), and that he 'fell / to make the living wise' (l.23). The strict,
consistent rhyme scheme drives home the didactic message of the poem, as does the repeated use of alliteration, such as 'shame sueth sinne' (l.18).
Shakespeare's Richard is a more complex, contradictory character, reflecting the theatrical purpose of the play. Richard is 'shown' as well as 'told'
which, particularly during the first two Acts, results in conflicting impressions of him. In Act 1 Scene 1, he appears as the regal, 'impartial' (1.1.115)
king, 'not born to sue, but to command' (1.1.196). The following scene begins to undermine this, as 'God's substitute' (1.2.37) is implicated by Gaunt
in the death of the Duke of Gloucester. Richard's appearance in the richly formal third scene reinforces his initial, regal portrayal but subsequently, his
expressed desire for Gaunt's 'physician... / To help him to his grave immediately' (1.4.58–59) and Gaunt's own violent indictment of this 'unstaid youth'
(2.1.2) finally and fatally undermine the 'showing' of Richard as a majestic, benevolent

Henry V Irony
The Irony Depicted in Shakespeare's Henry V
As Norman Rabkin has observed, Henry V is a play which organizes critics into "rival camps" of interpretation (35). It can be seen as a play that is
ambiguous; a play that exposes the playwright's own indecision; a play that aggressively takes sides in favour of nationalistic fervour which
Shakespeare himself didn't believe in (35). All of these views, writes Rabkin, are wrong since according to him the play's "ultimate power" lies in its
ability to "point in two opposite directions, virtually daring us to choose one of the two opposed interpretations" (36). In fact, it is Rabkin that is
wrong: not in his supposition that the play "dares" the audience to choose, but rather, that a reading ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In the case of the duplicity of Scrope and the other traitors, Henry makes them examples during their "public humiliation" (Brennan 42), "a public
demonstration," furthermore, "of his sense of injury." In Rabkin's words, he knows how to give a good "performance," verification of his "political
acumen" (Either/Or 45). Unlike his predecessors, this is a king who can recognize that he is in fact a role more than he is a man, and that "ceremony
consists only in what is conferred by others." (Rabkin 46). He is so dangerously pragmatic because he is "far less detectable and unsettling because he
has none of Richard III's vice–like propensity," and "we are liable to find his image building" similar to modern politicians (Brennan 24).
This is precisely the kind of brutal clarity that helps in his construction and use of the U.K.'s burgeoning state–hood as we know it in the modern sense:
"the modern world in which every action of a leader is shaped for public consumption" (Brennan 32). The nation is but a mass of potential chaos, a
multiplicity which only reaches its potential as a political, unitary force when it is summoned for battle. Henry's use of his soldiers for instance, and
stress on unity (their shared experience and camaraderie of Act ....), leads to the illusory notion that there is a possibility of "nobility" for those who
earn it (Brennan

Henry Vi Part 1 Downfall
While Shakespeare is often regarded as one of the most successful playwrights of history, even the greats have their downfalls. Henry the VI Part 1 has
been viewed with less esteem than Shakespeare's other plays, but this does not mean it is not sprinkled with phenomenal characters and other elements
unique to Shakespeare. Specifically, Shakespeare's Joan of Pucelle, or Joan of Arc, was considered one of Shakespeare's strongest female characters
written. Henry VI part 1 is a play often forgotten, abridged, and ridiculed, but despite its shaky performance history and low regard as a play, it still
sits on the book shelves of many a Shakespeare lover and is performed, however slim those performances may be. Throughout time the play has been
performed, ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The play is said to have a "lack of literary sophistication" and is "oft neglected and rarely performed" (Dell). Little is said about the failed play and
performances are rare and hard to find (Dell). A Google search on the play will only bring up results from one TV based on the play and one or two
mediocre performances and forgotten films before that. James Cooray Smith wrote a piece criticizing the play and it's many downfalls. The play,
obviously not one Shakespeare's best, was not performed after Shakespeare's death till the 1700's. Henry VI Part 1 is the least performed of all the
history plays and is one of the least performed Shakespeare plays in general. In fact, it was so rarely performed that it was not even possible for one
person to have seen the play twice in their lifetime until 1953. Often, Henry VI Part 1 is not performed in full and instead a few critical scenes are
added to Henry VI Part 2. The play adds very little to the Henry VI series so few give it much thought. More likely than not the play is looked on as a
poorly written prequel which was unlikely even written by Shakespeare

Historical Accuracy Of Henry Iv Plays By Shakespeare
Name Instructor Course Date Historical Accuracy in Henry IV Plays by Shakespeare Research shows that Shakespeare's historical plays do not
offer good sources for accurate rendering of historical events. The details of place of issues such as place, time, and personality are all subject to a
great deal of artistic license just as most of modern Hollywood movies about the past. However, to some extent, Shakespeare did research his
materials. Close analysis of his famous works and plays indicate that Henry IV draws upon a surprising range of disparate sources[CITATION
Jam991 p 4 l 1033 ]. One of the most obvious sources for Henry IV plays is Chronicles of England, Scotland, and Ireland by Raphael Holinshed, the
1587 edition. Holinshed style of history focuses on personalities and motivations of important historical figures as well as much detail regarding
Henry's IV tussle with Percy. Another important source used by Shakespeare in historical plays was The Civil Wars between the Two Houses of
Lancaster and York by Samuel Daniel. The poems written by Daniel differ greatly from that of Holinshed particularly on the emphasis on the
Princes of Wales and the rivalry he had with Hotspur. Shakespeare followed and used Daniel in portraying Hotspur as a much younger person at the
period of rebellion though history shows that he was older than King Henry IV was. Both Daniel and Shakespeare use the battle of Shrewsbury as an
occasion for the prince to prove his valor as well martial

Politics And Politics In Shakespeare
Shakespeare treats politics and politicians in a derogatory way as we can see that Lear sees them as being abject tricksters and Hamlet thinks that
they are evading God. The first political manual was Machiavelli`s The Prince believed to written in 1513 and it set the way people viewed politics
and politicians, which was impossible to be a favorably way. His pragmatic book exhibits the consolidation of power and the gain of it, and also
promotes the idea that politicians would do just about anything in their power to secure a strong state. The Prince describes what men do, and it was
banned by the Tudor politicians because it promoted politics in a vicious way. Richard III is the vicious he pursues Lady Anne in a brassy way as she
was grieving after her husband, Prince Edward, and her father–in–law, Henry IV. "Was ever woman in this humor woo`d? Was ever woman in this
humor won? What? I that kill`d her husband and his father, To take her in her heart`s extremest hate,... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
The credibility stood in their accents and impressive acting background. Richard (Sir Laurence David) is seen contemplating after his brothers
coronation and addresses the audience as he talks about the jealousy he feels when it comes to Edward (Sir Cedric Hardwicke). He fuels rivalries
and disorders in the court, because his sole purpose is to take the throne. The house of York and Lancaster engage into battle, as Richard managed
to, somehow, remove all obstacles and ended with a very well seen public image. The famous scene come before the eyes of the audience: knocked
down from his horse, Richard yells the line that everyone knows "A horse! A horse! My kingdom for a horse" (5.4) The fact that the battle scene
was filmed on location, gave the audience a taste of Richard`s despair as they can see him bloody and surrounded by his enemies in a place that is
more familiar than a theatre

Skepticism In Shakespeare's Othello
The funny thing about Shakespeare is his ways of expressing the philosophical ideas in his plays. The situation and the circumstances are created for
these special dialogues for revealing his moral values on relationship which was then scholarly and helped the play with the criticism by the
Elizabethan nobles and the educated society who appreciated his works for its universal truth which gave the dramatics his universal appeal,
The society of Shakespeare had no plagiarism checks and no commercials or the television sets , also it did not have the modern gadgets and the
internet, for the people to know what was happening around then, for those people , belonging to all classes, the news and the extraordinary stories
were bought to then not ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Shakespeare through the plot of All's Well That Ends Well points the meritocracy of the society and gives the solution by building up Helena's title for
which all the chaos that occurs in the play. Similarly in Othello the part of the great Othello, who emerges out of his social background sticks to the
audience and strives the play with the air of astonishing downfall through jealous yet the position and title remains for the character Othello possessed.
Hence Shakespeare have maintained the plot of theses plays by the virtues life lead by the protagonists.
Colin McGinn, author of Shakespeare and Philosophy puts it, "skepticism is Shakespeare's main theme," for "the possibility of error about people and
the world... in its many forms" is one of the consistent subjects of his plays. In the very beginning of the play All's Well That Ends Well, Shakespeare
points the philosophy of human love and the reality of life where The Countess dispensing some motherly wisdom to Bertram before he departs for
France.
"Love all, trust a few,
Do wrong to none: be able for thine

Essay on Hotspur as Tragic Hero of Henry IV
Hotspur as Tragic Hero of Henry IV
In Shakespeare's Henry IV Part One, the characters' many different conceptions of honor govern how they respond to situations. Each character's
conception of honor has a great impact on the character's standing after the play. For instance, Falstaff survived because he dishonorably faked his own
death, and his untrue claim that he was the one who killed Hotspur may get him a title and land. On the other hand, Hotspur lies dead after losing a
duel for honor. Hotspur, who is in many ways theideal man by the standards of his time, is killed by his lust for honor. In creating Hotspur,
Shakespeare has created a variation on the tragic hero of other works: the stubborn tragic hero, who, dying ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
In this he is similar to other famous tragic heroes. Oedipus was king at the opening of the play Oedipus Rex, and Odysseus was returning from a
great military conquest that had been won with an idea that was at least partly his. In addition, Hotspur experiences the traditional rise and fall
sequence of the tragic hero. As Hotspur's plot against the King unfolds, it appears that he has as allies all the forces of the men who were earlier
named as fighting England's wars, and the King does not even have his son. Here Hotspur hits his peak, just as Odysseus returning from victory at
Troy was at his peak as he started the journey home. Shakespeare packs almost all the bad news Hotspur will receive into a single scene, telling us
that many of Hotspur's allies have fallen out of the scene and describing the King's forces and reinforcements, including Hal's joining Henry. This is
in the style of the fall of the tragic hero, and follows the pattern set by Odysseus' sudden shipwreck and Oedipus' sudden understanding of what he is.
To complete the picture, there is what might have been. Just as Oedipus might have turned back from his quest for knowledge at any point, so
Hotspur had several clear opportunities to turn back, even at advantage. For instance, while the message carried by Worcester is altered, the message
Blunt took back to the King was not changed, and could have been an offer of peace, on Hotspur's terms. In addition, it is Hotspur who pushes

How Does Shakespeare Show At The End Of The Play Henry Vi?
William Shakespeare's Henry V
William Shakespeare is one of the most famous and influential writers of all time. His plays not only portray the past, but also aspects of love and hate,
humour and tragedy.
Henry V, written by Shakespeare, using Raphael Holinshed's historical chronicles, appealed to many of the citizens of that time, as it presented an
insight into their country's past, as well as 'feel–good' nationalism. It would have been performed on stage at a time when Henry VIII had secluded the
country of all contact with the Church of Rome. Providing the audience with its country's past glories and triumphs, the play counter–acts this feeling
of seclusion and loss of identity with ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Are they correct in their assumption: is Henry a great king, or does William Shakespeare merely include this as a biased opinion to enforce onto the
audience, so as to prosper the basis of patriotism already built earlier?
The play begins with the chorus' prologue to the play. Naturally, Shakespeare provides the chorus with words so descriptive and elegant that the
apology for lack of realism is forgotten, as is the stage and theatre, and, instead, the open planes of Agincourt are forcefully seen in one's 'minds eye'.
No more are we an audience, but a witness.
Shakespeare portrays Henry as a very religious king; whether this is to promote Henry or to express his own opinions as to what principles a King
should have, especially whilst Henry VIII was on the thrown at that time, and the Roman Church had been cut off from England, indicating that
religion wasn't too high on Henry VIII's agenda. There is evidence throughout the play that Henry was a religious king, "a true lover of the holy
church." From Shakespeare's view a good king always appreciates his creator and knows that it is God who will guide and look after him, so it would
have been important to include as many thanks to God from Henry and his men to prove that they actually show

Essay traglear King Lear as a Bradley Tragedy
King Lear as a Bradley Tragedy King Lear meets all the requirements of a tragedy as defined by Andrew Cecil Bradley. Bradley states that a
Shakespearean tragedy has to be the story of the hero and there is exceptional suffering and calamity slowly being worn in. Also, the current time
must be contrasted to happier times. The play also depicts the troubled parts in the hero's life and eventually he dies instantaneously because of the
suffering and calamity. There is the feeling of fear in the play as well, that makes men see how blind they are not knowing when fortune or something
else would be on them. The hero must be of a high status on the chain and the hero must also possess a tragic flaw that initiates the tragedy.... Show
more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Due to this flaw, Lear has given way to the two older daughters to conspire against him. Lear is finally thrown out of his daughters' homes and left
with a fool, a servant and a beggar. This is when Lear realizes the mistake that he has made and suffers the banishment of his two eldest daughters.
Lear is caught in a storm and begins to lose his sanity because he can not bear the treatment of his two daughters as well as the error he has made
with Cordelia and Kent. Lear also suffers from lack of rest when he is moving all over the place and the thing that breaks him is the death of his
youngest daughter, Cordelia. This suffering can be contrasted with other happier times like when Lear was still king and when he was not banished
by his two daughters. The feeling of fear is when Lear is in the storm raging against the gods, "I tax not you, you elements, with unkindness. I never
gave you kingdom, called you children, you owe me no subscription" (act #, scene #, line #), telling them to rage harder since he has not done
anything for them and that he didn't deserve what he has received from his two daughters. The fear is how Lear in a short period of time went from
king to just a regular peasant and from strong and prideful to weak and unconfident. This shows that men do not

Transformation In Macbeth
In Shakespeare's tragic works, protagonist characters often undergo subversion of their integrity to act upon the darker side of their humanity,
creating pathos for even the most despicable actions. Shakespeare's portrayal of Macbeth, a thane in WHAT century Scotland who rises to power, is
no different, yet many readers would argue his actions are inexcusable. The play follows him through his initial victory on the battlefield as a brave
Thane, fighting fearlessly and loyally for the king, who then encounters witches who prophecy of his coming kingship. He then feels that he must
fulfill the prophecy by dark means, and kills the king, a fellow thane who suspects him, and plots to kill those who oppose him. Driven mad by the
actions he committed,... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Callously, she refers to her husband as ambitious, yet apathetic towards acting on his desires. Not only is this unkind of her, it supplies the notion that
she knowingly pushes him, in the murder of King Duncan, to act upon what he would not otherwise pursue. An excerpt from the book Patterns in
Shakespearean Tragedies commenting on her manipulation of Macbeth to force him into malevolent action, remarks "Avoiding any reference to reason
or thoughtful behaviour. Lady Macbeth puts moral conscience to silence and tries rather to solicit Macbeth's imagination, subjecting action to "what
thou wouldst highly", to absolute and still unexpressed desire (182 Lang)." This coercion is exemplified in Act 1 Scene 7, where Macbeth directly
conveys to his wife that he will not kill Duncan (1.7.31–35). In response, she chastises him for withdrawing from the plan because of his fear, and
forcefully telling him that this is what he needs, and appealing to his natural ambition. Further compounding her involvement, she uses a second tactic
in the same scene in order to exploit Macbeth in his sympathy. Instead of allowing Macbeth to ruminate on his valued relationship with Duncan, she
changes the subject, exclaiming that his desertion reflects on how he will treat her, appealing to his emotive side in a way he is unable to shake
(1.7.36–39). By changing his easily

Analysis : Shake And Stir Theatre Company
Shake and Stir Theatre Company is a compelling theatrical voice which aspires to render Shakespeare's plays to appease modern audiences.
However, William Shakespeare penned his last play 400 years ago; despite this, his plays and sonnets are as alive today as they were in the 16th and
17th Centuries. Shakespeare's plays still appeal to modern society because of the universality of the dramatic themes– desire, domestic relationships,
the complications of love and power struggles in relationships – humans still experience these emotions and challenges which gives Shakespeare a
foothold in modern times (Bruster, 2014). Shake and Stir sequenced together an array of modified scenes from Shakespeare's most iconic plays, to
implore the dramatic meaning that Shakespearean text can be rendered to engross modern audiences while maintaining its integrity and Elizabethan
charm. "Great Shakes" is staged in a graveyard, where three year ten students, Betty, Brock and Ben are incarcerated. However, after appearances from
several supernaturals, they are returned to their everyday lives, but not before they are faced with the task to manipulate Shakespeare's tragedies,
comedies and histories to engage contemporary audiences. It is evident that Shake and Stir's production, "Great Shakes" effectively conveyed the
dramatic meaning of Shakespeare's relevance in contemporary society. This was made explicit through the re–contextualization of the historical context
and utilisation of conventions

Analysis Of ' Macbeth ' And ' Medea ' Essay
Charlotte Joko Beck said, "We have self–centered minds which get us into plenty of trouble. If we do not come to understand the error in the way we
think, our self–awareness, which is our greatest blessing, is also our downfall." In this particular quotation, Beck explores the bias of the human
psyche and its ability to favor personal hankerings over logic and morale. "Euripides introduced psychological realism into ancient Greek drama
through characters like Medea, whose motives are confused, complex, and ultimately driven by passion" (Galens and Spampinato para. 1). This
one–sided battle of wills is portrayed throughout the literary tragedies of history, and it is essential to the structure of both Shakespearean and Greek
tragedy: namely, those of Macbeth and Medea. In the nature of literary tragedy, tragic flaw and downfall go hand in hand. Macbeth and Medea,
although their circumstances differ in time and place, share more than one personality flaw; however, one major factor sets them apart. While the curse
of pride, ego, and an insatiable hunger for power all contribute to the mental or physical downfall of both Shakespeare's Macbeth and Euripides' Medea,
Macbeth's ultimate hamartia is knowledge: specifically, his discovery of the prophecy. Macbeth and Medea were prompted by their own pride to
commit violent and treasonous acts. Upon hearing of Macbeth's hesitance to murder King Duncan, Lady Macbeth points out that his internal conflict
only confuses his intentions,

How Does Shakespeare Have A Mistaken Identity In Much Ado...
English Draft – Much Ado About Nothing
By Amanda Dodds
'Shakespeare wrote his play in accordance with the conventions of an easily identifiable genre – history, comedy or tragedy.'
For centuries, William Shakespeare has been a beacon of storytelling genius. He has the ability to tell timeless stories that can be classified within the
genres comedy, tragedy and history. Proving as relevant today as they were 500 years ago, these stories conform to certain elements that define what
genre the story falls under. Comedies such as The Taming of the Shrew and A Midsummer Night's Dream, Tragedies such as Romeo and Juliet and
Hamlet and Histories such as King John and Henry V have all played a relevant role in defining the genres Shakespeare writes ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
This is evident as Claudio says:
"If I see anything tonight, why should I not marry her tomorrow in the congregation, where I should wed, there will I shame her"
(Act 3, Scene 2, Line 91)
From these two examples, it is obviously evident how Shakespeare implements the mistaken identity element within his comedy Much Ado About
Nothing, this element in particular generally gels with the other comedic element: Young Lovers working to overcome obstacles.
Much Ado about Nothing predominately revolves around the endeavours of two couples, the younger of which in more distinction; Claudio and
Hero. As many could say that another element of Shakespearean comedies could be love, it would seem a more defined term is the love between two
younger people, this young couple in particular then faces hindrances that are thrown their way, eventually working through them. Whereas there is
still Beatrice and Benedick who work to overcome their egomaniacal ways and eventually initiate a romance, it would seem Claudio and Hero's
complications seem to have more significance to the storyline of the play. This is also due to the fact that the elements of comedy and key plot points
are in relation to their complications, such as being the younger couple and facing the mistaken identity ordeal. Nevertheless, Hero and Claudio, being
the young couple, face a string of tribulations in which define them as a couple, the majority of these, come from Don John's

The Comedy of Hamlet
The Comedy of Hamlet
Shakespearean plays are often known for their outstanding entertainment and classic comic conflict. In his masterwork, Hamlet, Shakespeare uses these
aspects to serve his thematic purpose. He has used comedy throughout many of his historic plays, but in this play, comedy is the drawing point that
makes it fun and entertaining, yet clear and intuitive. Generally, his tragedies are not seen as comical, but in reality, they are full of humor. However,
these comic elements don't simply serve to relieve tension; they have much significance to the play itself. The characters of Hamlet, Polonius, Osric,
and the Gravediggers, prove to be very influential characters, and throughout the play, they are the individuals that ... Show more content on
Helpwriting.net ...
Osric's role during the play was to enlighten the intensity in the room and use humor to create a positive atmosphere. As courtier to the king, Osric
was not necessarily one of the most influential characters, but he did play an important role as a servant and "braggart soldier" (Draudt, 2002). His
character allowed a more powerful character (Hamlet), to "not only make fun of [his] diction, but also deliberately baffle and confuse [him] and thus
expose [his] slow wits" (Draudt, 2002). Throughout Act V, Osric isn't usually the one to offer the humor, but the humor is revolved around him. This
type of comedy reflects the meaning of his social class, and as Hamlet ridicules him, it only weakens his reputation. Nonetheless, Hamlet uses this
humor to poke fun at Osric and is therefore viewed as comedy. The importance of this action is to show the ignorance of Osric's character and how
easily he can be manipulated by his fellow men and because it highlights his function in society and his class rank.
In addition to being mocked, Osric also "serves as [a] foil to the hero (Hamlet), contrasting with [his] genuine wit... [and] honesty" (Draudt, 2002). As
a foil, Osric is the complete opposite of Hamlet, and that can be seen by the way Hamlet treats Osric. This reveals to the audience the differences

Essay about The Life of William Shakespeare
William Shakespeare was a very talented man known for his various works of literature. His works include poems, plays, and sonnets. His works are
then broken down into tragedies, comedies, and histories. Shakespeare left this world centuries ago, but his writings continue to live throughout the
world today. He has greatly impacted the world of literature and his existence will forever be remembered. In 1564, William Shakespeare was born in
Stratford–upon–Avon (Hazell 32). It seems that Shakespeare's career began around the year 1592. This was a tough time for playwrights and actors.
There was an outbreak of the bubonic plague which caused concerns for those wanting to watch because of being surrounded by those potentially ...
Along with being translated into every language, Shakespeare's words reach and are accepted by multiple races and cultures (McMillan). A reason
William Shakespeare is accepted by multiple races could be the fact that he does not ignore the issues and "tensions" between them and instead
makes light of them by including them in his plays such as Othello and The Merchant of Venice. He addresses the struggles between different colors
and religions. He never takes a designated side; he simply tells a story which is what has helped him be so well accepted ("Race – Introduction"). Not
only has Shakespeare related to his audiences through racial aspects, but also through common emotional experiences. Shakespeare used his words
and made them speak to his audiences using emotional feelings that anyone would naturally feel (McMillan). His works can be classified into three
main categories: tragedies, histories, and comedies ("William Shakespeare" 656). Each of these categories has characters that the audience can relate
to somehow. With Shakespeare's tragedies, his characters are noble heroes that are looked up to that are all facing tragedy. His histories obviously tell
the stories of events that have happened for people to relate to. William Shakespeare's comedies have characters that many find irresistible. And lastly,
the women in his plays can also be relatable. We can all

Tragic Hero in Othello by William Shakespeare
To analysis this play, one should first look into the playwright, William Shakespeare, and see if he has tendencies to certain styles or genres.
Shakespeare wrote about thirty–seven plays during his lifetime. Amanda Mabillard explained, "However, no one can know for certain because of the
inexact documentation at the time the plays were first being organized and published" (para. 1). This meant that many of his plays might had been lost
or forgotten. Of the thirty–seven plays he wrote ten tragedies, seventeen comedies, and ten histories. William followed these genres to the end;
however, he did not follow the classical models. These innovations made it harder for the types of genre to be recognized because they all started to blur
... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
Universal questions were asked and answered throughout the play. WasOthello predestined to fall? Now that is the real question. All the events that led
up to his suicide pushed the evidence closer and closer to a possible supernatural influence; however, Iago was involved with most of the manipulating
of Othello and Cassio. Jealously, race, manipulation, marriage, and hatred are all major themes of Othello. Throughout the story we see Othello
show jealousy and envy over what others have. He constantly is fearful of losing what he has (Desdemona). Racial comments were persistently
made towards Othello. He is a black hero and a military general. Through hard work and dedication he made his way up in the ranks to reach his
position of power and influence. However, at the same time his visual appearance as a black foreigner in Venice immediately causes him to be an
outsider. Desdemona's father, who believes his daughter's interracial marriage can only be the result of Othello's trickery, expresses good example of
this racism. "Moor", the racist remark, was used multiple times during the story as a form of disrespect shown towards Othello. Manipulation occurs for
the majority of the story between Iago and the other characters. Iago, the antagonist, consistently manipulates everyone around him to better serve
himself. It is strong theme of this play because it attacks the characters weaknesses and brings the overall downfall. Marriage,

Essay about Macbeth by William Shakespeare
Macbeth by William Shakespeare
'Macbeth,' one of William Shakespeare's shortest and bloodiest tragedies was written in 1606. Macbeth is also possibly the most memorable. It is a
mysterious and somewhat powerful play.
It has also attracted various film directors such as Polanski. Roman Polanski is famous for his horror and thriller – like films. He decided to express his
interpretation on it and filmed an unexpected and different version of the play 'Macbeth.'
The three witches in the tragedy Macbeth are introduced right at the beginning of the play and the brief opening few scenes give an immediate
impression of mystery, horror and uncertainty. This is a sign of things to come as witchcraft... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
It is a measured, low – key start.
The shot is held, a cough is heard and a stick gradually appears in the bottom left foreground. An old wrinkled hand covered in grime is guiding it,
as a circle is drawn in the sand. Hands scoop out the earth and dig down. There is a cut to a shot of a seagull circling the sky, sending out sounds of
desolation.
A noose is taken from a cart that the witches are dragging with them, it is folded and buried in the hole in the sand. The witches have faces, one of
them is young and does not look like a witch, she also does not seem to speak, the other two witches are old and one has no eyes.
A severed hand and forearm are buried and an aristocratic dagger is placed in its clenched fingers. This gives the idea of ambition, and a signal that
daggers are going to be important later in the story.
At this stage it creates mystery, and intrigues the audience. The hole is filled and a phial of blood is thrown on the buried items, and its vivid redness
takes us back to the opening shot,
The witches spit on the sand. The dialogue, 'Fair is foul and foul is fair, Hover through the fog and Filthy air.' is spoken in low key. Also Polanski has
changed the script by moving these lines to the beginning of the scene to create more tension earlier on in

Shake And Stir By William Shakespeare
Shake and Stir Responding Task Shake and Stir Theatre Company is a compelling theatrical voice which aspires to render Shakespeare's plays to
appease modern audiences. However, William Shakespeare penned his last play 400 years ago; despite this, his plays and sonnets are as alive today
as they were in the 16th and 17th Centuries. Shakespeare's plays still appeal to modern society because of the universality of the dramatic themes–
love, deceit, political endorsement, honour, ambition and courage– humans still experience these emotions which give Shakespeare a foothold in
modern times. Shake and Stir sequenced together an array of modified scenes from Shakespeare's most iconic plays, to implore dramatic meaning:
Shakespearean text can be rendered to engross modern audiences while maintaining its integrity and Elizabethan charm. "Great Shakes" is staged in a
graveyard, where three year ten students, Betty, Brock and Ben are incarcerated. However, after appearances from several supernaturals, they are
returned to their everyday lives, but not before they manipulate Shakespeare's tragedies, comedies and histories to engage contemporary audiences. It is
evident, Shake and Stir's production, "Great Shakes" effectively conveyed the dramatic meaning of Shakespeare's relevance in contemporary society.
This was made explicit through; the re–contextualization of the historical context, utilisation of conventions from modern theatre (cinematic theatre)
and Elizabethan theatre.

Shakespeare As A Modern Comedy
William Shakespeare was an English poet, playwright and actor. He is widely regarded as the greatest writer in the English language and the world's
pre–eminent dramatist. He is often called England's national poet and the "Bard of Avon." Shakespeare has written many plays during his time.
He wrote poems, tragedies, and of course some of his most known plays are comedies. What made Shakespeare so popular? Why are his comedies
so well known? How did his way of writing comedies form the way others wrote and continue to write in the years after him? These are some
questions many educators and students want to understand while studying Shakespeare. Focusing on his writing within his most popular comedies,
Shakespeare has formed literature into what it is today. When the first collected edition of Shakespeare's plays, the First Folio, was published in
1623, its contents page divided them into three categories: comedies, histories and, tragedies. The list of comedies included Measure for Measure
and The Merchant of Venice, plays that modern audiences and readers have not found particularly funny. Also included were two late plays, The
Tempest and The Winter's Tale, that critics often now classify as "romances" (Mullan). If we ask ourselves what these four plays have in common
with those such as As You Like It or Twelfth Night; which we are used to calling comedies, the answer gives us a clue to the meaning of "
comedy" for
many of Shakespeare's educated contemporaries. All of them

Characteristics Of Shakespearean Tragedy
2. SHAKESPEAREAN TRAGEDY
Shakespearean tragedy is the title given to most tragedies written by the playwright William Shakespeare. "Shakespearean tragedy began, roughly
speaking, with marked indebtedness to the tragic writing of Marlowe and Kyd: poetry, character, and style from Marlowe; motive, plot, and tragic
intensity from Kyd. No evidence suggests Shakespeare was ever particularly aware of or influenced by, Aristotelian theories of tragedy". (Bevington,
1980) The plays we usually have in mind when we think about Shakespearean tragedy are the classics like Titus Andronicus (written between 1590–94),
Romeo and Juliet (1594–96), Julius Caesar (1599), Hamlet (1599–1601), Othello (1603–04), King Lear (1605), Macbeth (1606–07), Antony and
Cleopatra (1606–07), and Coriolanus (1608) derived from Plutarch. Troilus and Cressida, Timon of Athens, and Cymbeline were listed as tragedies in
the First Folio. Characteristics of a Shakespearean tragedy are found in many of his histories, but since they are from real figures throughout England's
history, they were classified as "histories" in the First Folio. Exceptions from this are the Roman histories, also from historical figures: Julius Caesar,
Antony and Cleopatra, and Coriolanus. ... Show more content on Helpwriting.net ...
(Gredina, forthcoming) I am most interested in the human nature of the characters and I chose these three tragedies because their protagonists attracted
my attention the most. "Is Macbeth tempted to sin by the weird sisters and his wife, or is the choice to murder Duncan ultimately his? To what extent
is man responsible for his tragic fate?" (Bevington, 1980) The psychological aspect in his tragedies is impressive. I think the most impressive thing is
that even after more than 400 years we can still study his characters and their decisions from different

Consequences Of Deception In Romeo And Juliet

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Caitlin Wilson

More from Caitlin Wilson (11)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Consequences Of Deception In Romeo And Juliet