Blue carbon is becoming widely recognised as a critical component of all national carbon accounting schemes. Australia has invested heavily in collating existing estimates of blue carbon stocks and is currently targeting important yet poorly represented habitats around its extensive coastline. Much of this effort is linked with the CSIRO-funded Coastal Carbon Cluster. This 3-year program has developed and validated many approaches to blue carbon estimation and is now able to showcase best-practice methods. The activities of the Cluster have been used as a model for international efforts to develop global estimates, as well as national blue carbon inventories via the International Blue Carbon Scientific Working Group. Finally, static estimates of carbon can only describe the current carbon stock at a specific location; models can extrapolate these relationships into unsampled regions, as well as estimate carbon stock into the future given changes to climate as well as alterations to the geochemistry/hydrodynamics of a specific habitat.
Call Girls Ramtek Call Me 7737669865 Budget Friendly No Advance Booking
C5.07: Blue Carbon: Current status of Australian estimates and future model predictions - Peter Ralph
1. http://www.csiro.au/Coastal-Carbon-Cluster
Blue Carbon: Current status of
Australian estimates and future
model predictions
Peter Ralph, Carlos Duarte, Catherine Lovelock, Martina Doblin,
Stuart Phinn, Oscar Serrano, Trisha Atwood, Robert Canto, Virginie
van Dongen-Vogels, Joey Crosswell, Mark Baird and Andy Steven.
2. What is Blue Carbon?
• occupying only 2% of the seabed area, vegetated wetlands (seagrass, mangroves,
saltmarsh) represent 20% of the carbon transfer from oceans to sediments.
3. Blue Carbon Initiative
• Develop management approaches, financial incentives and policy
mechanisms for ensuring the conservation, restoration and sustainable
use of coastal blue carbon ecosystems;
• Develop comprehensive methods for assessing blue carbon stocks and
emissions;
• Support scientific research into the role of coastal blue carbon
ecosystems for climate change mitigation.
4. Marine and Coastal Carbon
Biogeochemistry Cluster
• 8 institutions (2013-2015)
> 50 scientists and students
~ 20 CSIRO scientists
5. Goals of the Cluster
– Improve our understanding of the spatial variability in carbon storage
to derive national estimates of ecosystem service
– Evaluate the impact of disturbances on Blue C storage when habitats
are modified
– Compile a national dataset on Blue C data (C stocks, flux, nutrient
stoichiometry and isotope C signatures).
– Develop quantitative models of carbon as required for Australian
coastal areas to improve global carbon estimates
11. Number of assessed sites
0
10
20
30
40
Mangroves
0
10
20
30
40
50
Salt marsh
0
50
100
150
Australia
Denmark
Spain
USA
United…
Other…
Italy
Philippi…
Greece
Malta
Thailand
Indone…
Mexico
Cyprus
Norway
Panama
France
Portugal
Seagrass
12. Data needed for repository
• illustrate with just seagrass habitat
– carbon stock with depth
– source (allochthonous v autochthonous)
– age of carbon
– recalcitrance of carbon
– carbon flux estimates
– potential for release after disturbance
• challenges of coastal ocean production estimates
13. M green 2 m
J grey 4 m
K orange 6 m
P blue 8 m
Q red control
0"
20"
40"
60"
80"
100"
120"
140"
0" 2000" 4000" 6000" 8000" 10000"
Cummula&ve)Biomass)
gOC)/m2)
Depth(cm) 0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
C cummula ve biomass
kg OC m-2
0 2 4 6 8 10
4-fold difference in the
Corg stocks along a depth
gradient,
and up to 8-fold difference
between seagrass and un-
vegetated = C sinks
Carbon stores along a depth gradient
Serrano et al. 2014 GBC
deeper – less light
14. Processes controlling C stocks in
seagrass sediments
• productivity
• allochthanous inputs - wave energy
• depth – reduced light
Jimena Samper
What’s important?
Under revision – Limnology and Oceanography
15. Carbon stock and flux estimates
• cores provide stock estimates
• chambers provide flux estimates
http://www.labexmer.eu/
Pemika Apichanangkool
17. Benthic plant parameterisations
Coral biomass
Seagrass biomass
Benthic microalgae biomass
Spectrally-resolved optical model critical for
bottom growing conditions – now in near real
time
19. Australian coastal carbon estimation:
Global to continental to regional scale estimates from existing data
x
Carbon stock and
flux per unit area
Habitat
Area
= Carbon Stock
Global scale Continental scale Local scale
Seagrass
Saltmarsh
Mangrove
NT
VIC
TASQLD
SA WA
NSW
Single stock and flux value
per unit area
State specific stock and flux
value per unit area
Habitat type specific stock
and flux value per unit area
20. Data needed for repository
• illustrate with just seagrass habitat
– carbon stock with depth
– source (allochthonous v autochthonous)
– age of carbon
– recalcitrance of carbon
– carbon flux estimates
– potential for release after disturbance
• challenges of coastal ocean production estimates
21. V. van Dongen-Vogels108o
E 120o
E 132o
E 144o
E 156o
E
60o
S
45o
S
30o
S
15o
S
0o
SamplingYears
1990
2000
2010
45o
S
30o
S
15o
S
0o
onths
10
12
Coastal productivity
Sampling techniques
Sampling year
Sampling month
22. Parameter library
V. van Dongen-Vogels http://parameterlibrary.shinyapps.io/distributionexplorer
23. Summary
– spatial variability in carbon storage to derive national estimates of
ecosystem service
– national dataset on Blue Carbon data (C stocks, nutrient
stoichiometry and isotope C signatures).
– quantitative models of carbon are required for Australian coastal
areas to improve global carbon estimates
25. CO2 emissions with degradation
Organic matter can be re-emitted as CO2 once the ecosystem is disturbed or degraded
Restoration can reinstate C sequestration
Few data to assess the risks of CO2 emissions
Developing a suite of tools for estimating potential for CO2 emissions
27. Blue Carbon policy
UNESCO/IUCN/IOC/CI recognised the gaps
– science: how much carbon can be lost/restored over time
– economics: at what cost?
– policy: can current policy frameworks work?
– 2012 - Verified Carbon Standard recognized Wetland Restoration and
Conservation for carbon finance.
– 2013 mangrove restoration was included in Reducing Emissions
Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD+)
– 2013 - Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) adopted the
Supplement to the 2006 Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories:
Wetlands (Wetlands Supplement).
29. Australia’s coasts
• biodiverse
• highly productive
• significant store of carbon
• undergoing significant change
• un-quantified and unaccounted carbon
30. Coastal marine ecosystems
cover less than 0.5 % of total
marine surface …
Mangroves Salt marshes Seagrass
Ecosystem
Mangroves
Salt marsh
Seagrass
Area
(106 km2)
0.2
0.4
0.3-0.6
% marine
surface
0.05
0.1
0.07-0.15
Duarte et al 2005
mangrove salt marsh seagrass
Adapted from slides courtesy of C. Duarte
31. Benthic coupling
Environmental Controls
• Tidal amplitude
• Freshwater discharge
• Sediment load
• Temperature
• Eutrophication index
• Coastline/basin type
• Morphology
• Hydrology
• Lithology
Sediment Accretion data
Statistical Model
Spatially-explicit estimate of mangrove accretion rates
32. Mangrove and saltmarsh carbon stocks
UQ Graduate student
Matthew Hayes
• Variation in carbon over different
“settings”
• Most carbon is in riverine
settings
• In non-riverine settings carbon
increases with elevation above
What did we find?
33. LOSS OF CARBON STOCKS IN SEAGRASS MEADOWS
DUE TO MOORING ACTIVITIES
AT ROTTNEST ISLAND, WESTERN AUSTRALIA
34. LOSS OF CARBON STOCKS IN SEAGRASS MEADOWS
DUE TO MOORING ACTIVITIES
35. LOSS OF CARBON STOCKS IN SEAGRASS MEADOWS
DUE TO MOORING ACTIVITIES
36. LOSS OF CARBON STOCKS IN SEAGRASS MEADOWS
DUE TO MOORING ACTIVITIES
Loss of 4.8 kg Corg m-2 in the 50 cm-thick deposits studied as a result
of mooring deployments, and loss of 1.7 Kg Corg m-2 over an average
of 50 years after mooring deployment
37. 37
C stores along depth gradients in Posidonia meadows
94%
83%
46%
43%
20%
Depth SAR
2 m 1.3 mm y-1
4 m 1.5 mm y-1
6 m 0.8 mm y-1
8 m 1.0 mm y-1
Bare 1.5 mm y-1
38. Abstract – as submitted to Blue Planet
Symposium
• 15 min presentation only – just so you know what was submitted
• Blue carbon is becoming widely recognised as a critical component of all national
carbon accounting schemes. Australia has invested heavily in collating existing
estimates of blue carbon stocks and is currently targeting important yet poorly
represented habitats around its extensive coastline. Much of this effort is linked
with the CSIRO-funded Coastal Carbon Cluster. This 3-year program has developed
and validated many approaches to blue carbon estimation and is now able to
showcase best-practice methods. The activities of the Cluster have been used as a
model for international efforts to develop global estimates, as well as national blue
carbon inventories via the International Blue Carbon Scientific Working Group.
Finally, static estimates of carbon can only describe the current carbon stock at a
specific location; models can extrapolate these relationships into unsampled
regions, as well as estimate carbon stock into the future given changes to climate
as well as alterations to the geochemistry/hydrodynamics of a specific habitat.
39. V. van Dongen-Vogels
Phytoplankton production observations are not spatially and temporally consistent
in the methods used, years, and time of the year
Editor's Notes
Started to be recognised back in 2011
Conservation International (CI)
International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN),
Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (IOC-UNESCO).
The Coastal Carbon Cluster will assist CSIRO in the acceleration of the development and delivery of marine, climate and ecological information streams based on biogeochemical and ecological models and ocean colour capability that will:
(i) better evaluate and predict primary productivity and its importance to environmental and economic services,
(ii) assess the implication of climate-induced changes on biogeochemical cycles, including ocean acidification,
(iii) Sequestration options including the application of Blue Carbon and other strategies for carbon burial, and
(iv) develop and improve methods that can be used to:
a. make carbon measurements
b. assimilate carbon data into models
c. quantify model uncertainties.
All studies on Blue C in Australia_Mangroves (CCC and non-CCC)
(Source: dejan suc/iStockphoto
All studies on Blue C in Australia_Saltmarshes (CCC and non-CCC)
But where are SM habitats – we have lost some but smaller distribution
All studies on Blue C in Australia_Seagrasses (CCC and non-CCC)
Difference in Corg storage capacity of continuous Posidonia sinuosa meadows at Garden Island along a depth-induced gradient of light availability (from 2 to 8 m water depth). 0.5 to 1m-long core.
In red there is the data from a bare sand core, located >2km away of any meadow.
NPP-VGPM and NPP-BGC are both compute with in situ inputs.
I need to update with NPP-VGPM compute with satellite MODIS data inputs
I need to update with regionally distinct responses …
Overall current results suggest that we may need to have different adjustment depending upon the region (and perhaps the time of the year sampled) which might need to be further assessed for being able to get the magic PP model formula that will update itself according to location and time of the year.
Contribution of the P vs E dataset (~14C-PP 1hr) to model parameter library http://parameterlibrary.shinyapps.io/distributionexplorer - CSIRO colleagues Barbara et al.
Various filters (e.g. water type, region, voyage, etc… that can help redefine better each variable, however there are clear lack of number of in situ PP physiology and 14C-PP datapoints for some regions and a clear lack of temporal variability for some region.
I have here added my own Probability Distribution Function for Pmax (normalized to Chla) as obtained by grouping per different regions around Australia, including the Southern Ocean (SO), the Western (west) and Eastern Australia (east), the Northern Australia (north), and as well as datapoint located south of the PFZ (south(PFZ)).
This 3-year program has developed and validated many approaches to blue carbon estimation and is now able to showcase best-practice methods. The activities of the Cluster have been used as a model for international efforts to develop global estimates, as well as national blue carbon inventories via the International Blue Carbon Scientific Working Group. Finally, static estimates of carbon can only describe the current carbon stock at a specific location; models can extrapolate these relationships into unsampled regions, as well as estimate carbon stock into the future given changes to climate as well as alterations to the geochemistry/hydrodynamics of a specific habitat.
This WP is focussed on: 1) Improving representation of C stocks and fluxes in biogeochemical models2) Validating remotely sensed PP productsFrom Vinnie:- Plot of locations where we have phytoplankton stock and PP data- Output from Barbara’s interactive website to show we are contributing to model parameter library - Plot of observations versus VGPM model
Ecosystems globally distributed, except mangroves that are restricted to latitudes between 30 ºS and 30ºN.
Flux estimates and how this can be used to inform models
Moorings at Rottnest were deployed in the 1920s and scars within the meadows are evident.
The study of Cstorage in living meadows and scars provided some of the first data on C stores loss after disturbance in seagrass ecosystems.
We sampled at Thompson Bay (the entry of Rotto) and Stark Bay. 16 cores in total, 8 per site, 4 per treatment, around 50 cm-long.
This is meand +-SD
Carbon stores were significantly higher in vegetated patches, and the d13C more related to seagrass detritus in seagrass patches. Both sites show similar patterns
The erosion of fine sediments from the scars could contribute to the loss of Corg since fine-grained particles have higher capacity to store Corg. Although we found that Corg stores are lost after mooring deployment, the fate of Corg stores remain unknow (remineralization, but also burial elsewhere, herbivory, etc.)
Difference in Corg storage capacity of continuous Posidonia sinuosa meadows at Garden Island along a depth-induced gradient of light availability (same gradient as previous slide).
Results mixing models to identify the sources of Corg in the sediments (on the left), showing 80-95% seagrass contribution in shallow_ 2 and 4m_ meadows, and 43-46% seagrass contribution in deeper_4 and 6 m_meadows.
Mixing models based on 3 sources (terrestrial, algae/seston and seagrass matter), based on C only. The effect of light reduction on d13C values has been accounted for by measuring isotopes in the plant debris found buried in the different cores = each mixing model was run using the same sources (values for the sources) except for the seagrass signal (which varied according to the results obtained).
Fine grained sediment content (<0.125 mm)_ vs %Corg, showing an increase in Corg content linked to an increase of fine grained sediments. Clear and dark circles are shalloer 2 and 4 m meadows.
SAR (sediment accumulation rates) based on 210Pb analysis
Main conclusion/hypothesis: shallow meadows are more dense and productive and a series of factors may lead to higher Corg storage. In shallow meadows: higher meadow density, higher plant biomass Corg stores, higher fine grained particles (more Corg content and anoxia contributing to preservation), higher SAR (more rapid anoxic conditions and vertical building). Plant-detritus contribution into the sediment it what makes the difference, since deeper Cstorage is more similar to bare sediments, and all sediments store C to some degree
Phytoplankton production observations are not spatially and temporally consistent in the methods used, years, and time of the year.
Number of data points for 14C-1hr = 350 ok number and relatively good spatial coverage around Australia (compared to 14C-4hr method mainly being in the North, or 14C-24 hr method mainly in the West of Australia)
Number of data points for 14C-4hr = 350
Number of data points for 14C-1hr = 35
(I need to double check these numbers!!)
Comparison between in situ and satellite data products for model validation may request further in situ observations (e.g. middle plot: high numbers of data in the blue which might not be available for MODIS or SeaWIFS matchups.
Overall bias occurred spatially and temporally…