course materials

1. Clinic Current Electronic Health Discussion
Clinic Current Electronic Health DiscussionClinic Current Electronic Health
DiscussionPrepare a comprehensive and creative PowerPoint regarding the project you
have been preparing throughout this courseAddress the background and introduction of the
topic you have selected,provide a detailed review of the issues, challenges, and components
of the project,stakeholders involved,project evaluation plan,implications for practice,and a
conclusion.ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERSssignment:
Informatics PowerPoint Presentation A creative narrated professional PowerPoint
presentation will be submitted that portrays the final project. This comprehensive project is
instrumental in assisting you to have a strong knowledge base related to current topics in
healthcare informatics. The intended audience for this presentation is the senior leadership
team who will be responsible for approving the project implementation. Instructions: 1.
Prepare a comprehensive and creative PowerPoint regarding the project you have been
preparing throughout this course 1. Address the background and introduction of the topic
you have selected, 2. provide a detailed review of the issues, challenges, and components of
the project, 3. stakeholders involved, 4. project evaluation plan, 5. implications for practice,
6. and a conclusion. 2. Organize the content with colorful headings and backgrounds making
the presentation readable and creative and include your narration. 1. Presentation should
be no longer than 15-20 minutes 2. Do not overburden the slides with text. • Include a
paragraph discussing your main “take-aways” from this project. What did you learn from
this project that will benefit you as a DNP-prepared nurse leader? Clinic Current Electronic
Health DiscussionImbedding a Standardized Depression Screening tool in to the Electronic
Health Records Proposal & Scope Statement Project Name: Imbedding a Standardized
Depression Screening tool in to the Electronic Health Records Department: Out- patient
mental health Clinic Project Manager: Rita Dexter Date: 4/12/2010 Prepared By Document
Owner(s) Project/Organization Role Rita Dexter Planning, cost, datelines, tools and
personnel for final implementation of proposed project Project Goals or Objectives 1, All
practitioners will utilize the same depression screening tool 2, All Practitioners will be able
to able to access patient’s previous visits for continuity of care Project Product / Technology
Product: Electronic Health Record Technology: An adaptation of the current EHR Project
Connection to Health Objective 1. To increase rates of depression screening 2. To promote
continuity of care 3. To better manage/treat depression. Assumptions/Limitations/Risks
Assumptions :To have the ability to make adaptation in the HER Limitations/Risks: Cost
restraints, extra time needed for education, possible rejection by clinicians who are

2. resistant to change/technology Project Evaluation Plan 1. Evaluate Clinician’s use of the
electronic screening tool 2. Evaluate Clinician’s satisfaction with the tool Overall Project
Priority: High Medium Low Project Description: A proposed project to Modify the clinic’s
current Electronic health record to improve depression screening and monitoring by
providing continuity of care and avoid patient’s falling through the cracks. *This worksheet
was adapted from material for HealthIT Workforce Curriculum (Comp 19 Unit 3) that was
developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department of Health and Human
Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology under
Award Number IU24OC000013. This material was updated in 2016 by Johns Hopkins
University under Award Number 90WT0005. Stakeholder Register Project Name Imbedding
a Standardized Depression Screening tool into the Electronic Health Records Product /
Application Electronic Health Record Author Rita Dexter Date Created 4/12/2010 Date Last
Modified 4/20/2021 The project aims at modifying the clinic’s current Electronic health
record to improve depression screening and monitoring by providing continuity of care and
avoid patient’s falling through the cracks Project Summary Project Goals: 1, All practitioners
will utilize the same depression screening tool 2, All Practitioners will be able to able to
access patient’s previous visits for continuity of care Stakeholder Register *This worksheet
was adapted from material for HealthIT Workforce Curriculum (Comp 19 Unit 3) that was
developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department of Health and Human
Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology under
Award Number IU24OC000013. Clinic Current Electronic Health DiscussionThis material
was updated in 2016 by Johns Hopkins University under Award Number 90WT0005. Name
Department / Company Project Management manager/ Trainer Role Expectati ons
Influence / Interest / Involvement Impact / Importance / Power Stakeholder Category
Planning, monitoring, executing and closing the project. The project manager will be
accountable for project team, success as well as failures of the project. Directing the strategy
and developm ent of the project Low Low Other players (monitor) clinicians and other
staffs how to use the depression screening tool to ensure success of the project Informatio
IT n Technolo gy expert Updating security policies for the project and creating project
progress reports and to be handed to the project manager Reflect the changing expectatio
ns of leadership in the clinical setting High Software Software developer development
Designing, researching, implementing and managing the software program for the project
Ensuring the project aligns with the features of the existing Electronic Health Record system
High Low Affected players (Keep informed) High Important players (Keep satisfied) *This
worksheet was adapted from material for HealthIT Workforce Curriculum (Comp 19 Unit 3)
that was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department of Health and
Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
under Award Number IU24OC000013. This material was updated in 2016 by Johns Hopkins
University under Award Number 90WT0005. Name Department / Company Other Clinical
Clinicians department ;Therapist s,NPs,So cial workers Role Expectati ons Influence /
Interest / Involvement Impact / Importance / Power Stakeholder Category Applying the
expected change in software. The clinicians are expected to adapt, master how to navigate
and use the screening tool inbuilt in the software High High Important players (Keep

3. satisfied) Stakeholder Grid High Important Players (Keep satisfied) Key players: (Manage
closely) *This worksheet was adapted from material for HealthIT Workforce Curriculum
(Comp 19 Unit 3) that was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the
Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health
Information Technology under Award Number IU24OC000013. This material was updated
in 2016 by Johns Hopkins University under Award Number 90WT0005. Clinic Current
Electronic Health DiscussionSoftware developer Other Clinicians;Therapists,NPs,Social
workers Impact Low Other players (Monitor) Project Manager/ Trainer Low Affected
players (Keep informed) Information Technology expert Influence High *This worksheet
was adapted from material for HealthIT Workforce Curriculum (Comp 19 Unit 3) that was
developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department of Health and Human
Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology under
Award Number IU24OC000013. This material was updated in 2016 by Johns Hopkins
University under Award Number 90WT0005. Informatics Project SWOT worksheet Internal
Strength • The organization’s strength is that; it is a Internal Weaknesses • relatively small
organization staffed with adequately trained experts. The staff will be responsible for
ensuring timely and Lack of funding and resources to project • High staff turnover which
will require constant training accurate screening. The staff is willing to be involved in the
project. • Internal teams dedicated to research and new innovations • Modern technology
and EHR for easy incorporation of the screening tool. External Opportunity Threats *This
worksheet was adapted from material for HealthIT Workforce Curriculum (Comp 19 Unit 3)
that was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department of Health and
Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
under Award Number IU24OC000013. This material was updated in 2016 by Johns Hopkins
University under Award Number 90WT0005. • The greatest opportunity for this particular
organization’s geographic advantage and strategic location. As such, it provides a grand
opportunity for Economic slowdown due to the current COVID-19 pandemic resulting in
telehealth which is a challenge with the Medicaid population which comprises 90% of the
clinic’s patient base; no calls no shows, limiting screening rates. care providers to screen for
depression in an area with very few clinics of it kind. It is probable that the population will
experience compassion and thoughtfulness from the clinic for getting an opportunity to be
screened. Provision of conducive and encouraging environment for mental health
consideration means that patients will heighten their willingness to seek medical help for
depression. • Lack of dominant competition around the clinic’s location EVALUATION PLAN
PROJECT:Imbedding a Standardized Depression Screening tool into the Electronic Health
Records PREPARED BY: DATE: 5/11/2010 *This worksheet was adapted from material for
HealthIT Workforce Curriculum (Comp 19 Unit 3) that was developed by Johns Hopkins
University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National
Coordinator for Health Information Technology under Award Number IU24OC000013. This
material was updated in 2016 by Johns Hopkins University under Award Number
90WT0005. Brief Project Description:The project aims at modifying the clinic’s current
Electronic health record to improve depression screening and monitoring by providing
continuity of care and avoid patient’s falling through the cracks Project Goals: 1. To enable

4. all practitioners utilize the same depression screening tool 2. To prepare all Practitioners to
access patient’s previous visits for continuity of care Evaluation Goals: • To prepare an all
inclusive project report for the stakeholders of the project • To critically assess the project’s
return on investment • To convince reluctant stakeholders the value of the project • Clinic
Current Electronic Health DiscussionTo dertmine the project’s implementation phases.
Evaluation Measures: Clinical Outcomes Clinical Process Provider Adoption & Attitudes
Patient Adoption, Knowledge, & Attitudes Workflow Impact Financial Impact Evaluation
Measures: Goal: To enable all practitioners utilize the same depression screening tool.
Measurement. Improvement in the accuracy of depression screening among the
practitioners. Goal: To prepare all Practitioners to access patient’s previous visits for
continuity of care. Measurement. Proper retrieval of patient’s health records to facilitate
diagnosis and treatment of depression. *This worksheet was adapted from material for
HealthIT Workforce Curriculum (Comp 19 Unit 3) that was developed by Johns Hopkins
University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National
Coordinator for Health Information Technology under Award Number IU24OC000013. This
material was updated in 2016 by Johns Hopkins University under Award Number
90WT0005. Possible qualitative measures to consider: One of the quantitative measures is
to consider the practioner’s ability to make use of the screening tool. The measure will allow
the project evaluators to gain insights in to how practitioners interact with the new
depression screening tool. The quanlitative measures will reveal to the stakeholders and
overall project audiences about the project’s success. The other qualitative measure will be
evaluating the clinical process in the depression screening procedures. Consistent clinical
process will enable the care providers to observe the continuity of care for more promising
patient outcomes. Evaluation of project barriers: One of the speculated barriers is financial
constraints. Successful implementation of the project calls for adequate financing to ensure
every implementation phasei effectively accomplished. Inadequate corporation from the
project funders might be the greatest source of financial constraints. The other possible
project barrier is the lack of cohesiveness and unity among the stakeholders which might
delay or even compromise the implementation of the project. Evaluation of project
facilitators: The main project facilitators that will oversee the success of the project will
require strong leadership skills, should be able to utilize management functions that
pertains to the project to actively listen and involve the group to make sure everything is
adequately accomplished. The facilitator will be evaluated on the training provided to the
providers who will actually be using the tool for the project to see if additional training is
needed. Rating Evaluation Measures: *This worksheet was adapted from material for
HealthIT Workforce Curriculum (Comp 19 Unit 3) that was developed by Johns Hopkins
University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National
Coordinator for Health Information Technology under Award Number IU24OC000013Clinic
Current Electronic Health Discussion. This material was updated in 2016 by Johns Hopkins
University under Award Number 90WT0005. Very Important: • • Clinical outcomes
Provider adoption and attitudes Moderately Important: • Clinical process • Workflow
Impact Not Important: • Patient Adoption, Knowledge, & Attitudes Rate Measurement
Feasibility: Feasible: • Clinical outcomes • Workflow Impact • Clinical process Moderate

5. Effort: • Provider adoption and attitudes Not Feasible: • Patient Adoption, Knowledge, &
Attitudes Place measures in an Importance-Feasibility grid to determine which measures to
undertake and which measures to avoid. *This worksheet was adapted from material for
HealthIT Workforce Curriculum (Comp 19 Unit 3) that was developed by Johns Hopkins
University, funded by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the National
Coordinator for Health Information Technology under Award Number IU24OC000013. This
material was updated in 2016 by Johns Hopkins University under Award Number
90WT0005. Feasibility Scale 1-Feasible Importance scale 1-Very Important • 2-Moderate
Effort Clinical outcomes & Provider adoption and attitudes 2Moderately Important •
Clinical process (1) • Workflow Impact • Workflow Impact (3) 3-Not Important 3-Not
Feasible Patient Aoptation, knowledge, & Attitudes (5) (2) • Provider adoption and attitudes
(4) • Patient Aoptation , knowledge ,& Attitudes Chosen Measures to Evaluate: *This
worksheet was adapted from material for HealthIT Workforce Curriculum (Comp 19 Unit 3)
that was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department of Health and
Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
under Award Number IU24OC000013. This material was updated in 2016 by Johns Hopkins
University under Award Number 90WT0005. 1. Clinical Ouctomes 2. Clinical process 3.
Provider adoption and attitudes. Evaluation Study Design: (Shaded areas indicate which
strategy fits which design Data Collection Strategies Types of Study Designs Case-Control
RCT Time-Motion Pre-Post Manual Chart Review Electronic Data Mining of EMR /Registry
Data Surveys (Paper/Electronic) Expert Review Focus Group Consider the Impact of Study
Design on Relative Cost and Feasibility Coming up with surveys either in electric or paper
format is quite expensive and time consuming. For instance, one would need to validate the
information gotten from the surveys which is ultimately expensve and requires a lot of time
and commitment. When using focus groups, one would require logistics and adequate
planning which becomes complex process especially when stakeholders with busy
schedules are asked to convene. Manual chart review, as one of the data collection strategies
is both expensive and time consuming especially when many charts are used in reviewing
study design. Electronic data mining enetails application of more sophisticated statistical
approaches for effective analsysis of the existing data within the provided data base. One of
the major shortcoming with this strategy is that one will need to have access to expertly
trained statisticians to analyze and model patterns within the given dataset. *This
worksheet was adapted from material for HealthIT Workforce Curriculum (Comp 19 Unit 3)
that was developed by Johns Hopkins University, funded by the Department of Health and
Human Services, Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
under Award Number IU24OC000013. This material was updated in 2016 by Johns Hopkins
University under Award Number 90WT0005. Choose Your Final Measures: 1. Clinical
Ouctomes 2. Clinical process 3. Clinic Current Electronic Health Discussion