Creation Vs Evolution Essay

Creation Vs Evolution
According to the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development Committee, "The main
purpose of the American school is to provide for the fullest possible development of each learner
for living morally, creatively, and purposefully in a democratic society" (Platform of Beliefs 232).
Most Americans are aware of one of the top controversial topics within the public education system:
Evolution vs. Creation. When it comes to our universe's existence it gets very tricky. Many different
viewpoints are brought up based on personal beliefs. The greatest question is: should students be
taught only one way on this subject? Why offer only one side, one opinion? Given that evolution has
not been proven, it should not be the lone required science...show more content...
Borene dismissed the case of Rodney LeVake v Independent School District 656, et al. (Order
Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum, Court File Nr.
CX–99–793, District Court for the Third Judicial District of the State of Minnesota [2000]). High
school biology teacher LeVake had argued for his right to teach "evidence both for and against the
theory" of evolution. The school district considered the content of what he was teaching and
concluded that it did not match the curriculum, which required the teaching of evolution. Given the
large amount of case law requiring a teacher to teach the employing district's curriculum, the judge
declared that LeVake did not have a free speech right to override the curriculum, nor was the district
guilty of religious discrimination" (Matsumura and
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Evolution Vs. Creation Essay
Evolution! The theory that every living organism has come from a lesser organism. A theory that
claims humans have come from monkeys. This "theory", is what's being taught to our children in
school. If a child asks a teacher about the theory of Creation, they are sure to get a response like,
"I'm not allowed to answer that question", or something along those lines, because schools are not
allowed to teach on religious subjects. I guess schools think that evolution is the next best thing.
I believe that the world was created by God!
Ever since I have been in high school I have questioned the theory of evolution.
We are going to look at the theory of evolution and where the theory originated. We will also look at
the theory of...show more content...
Materialistic philosophy is a philosophy that places materialistic goods above spiritual values; this
type of philosophy is what produced the theory of evolution.
The person who put forth the theory of evolution the way it is defined today, was an amateur English
Naturalist, Charles Robert Darwin.
According Darwin, "living species were not created by God, but came from a common ancestor and
differentiated from each other as a result of natural conditions." Listen to an example given by the
History Of Science Society, "Giraffes evolved from antelope–like creatures by extending there necks
further and further from generation to generation in order to reach higher and higher branches of
food."
He said living creatures were passing the traits they had acquired during their lifetime from one
generation to another, and therefore we evolving. I think that it is safe to say the theories of Darwin
were based on the power of imagination.
As we have seen, the Theory of evolution has not been based on any scientific evidence, or even
been claimed by a scientist. Yet the theory has been taught to students across the country as the truth.
Now that we have looked at the theory of evolution, lets take a look at the theory of

Creation Vs Evolution Essay
Creation vs. Evolution Creation vs evolution has always been a big topic. Christianity vs.
evolution is mainly a question of where did we come from? Or how has everything come into
existence. Many people believe in evolution because they simply think it makes sense (which it does
not) or because they refuse to believe in Christianity. People who believe in Christianity believe in it
by faith. The Bible is the main source of information on Christianity.Evolution is a theory that the
world and everything we know today came to be by chance or accident. The people who believe in
evolution believe in it the same way that Christians believe in Christianity by Faith. Evolution is not
based on religion like Christianity is but on solely observation...show more content...
Evolutionists spend a lot of their time trying to prove creation wrong and give out false fact when
they should be trying to defend their own theory. Evolution has a lot of loose ends that they do
not try to tie up. Such as they ignore the fact that matter cannot be created or destroyed which
throws their theory out the window. They simply give a lot of long excuses to try to hide the fact
that their wrong. That something cannot come from nothing or the entire universe cannot just
appear out of nothing. Or that evolution itself has a lot of misleading fact. Creation has all the
evidence it need in the Bible not to mention that there are a lot of scientific fact to prove Creation.
The Bible is Gods way of communicating with his people and he uses the Bible to communicate.
In the Bible it says that in the beginning God created the heavens and the earth which is plenty of
evidence for how the earth and all of creation was created. Evolutionists nor scientist can disprove
that there is a God or if the Bible is true or not. But scientists have disproven a lot of claimed facts
and experiments of evolutionists. The Bible tells us that God and heaven is invisible and all we half
to do is believe in his existence. Like evolution people half to believe in evolution in order to see if it
is true or

Evolution vs. Creation Essay
Don't Monkey Around in Class
"In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth" (Gen. 1:1). Words of this nature have been
questioned for thousands of years–by naturalists, materialists, humanists, etc.–and, in more recent
times, have led to court cases, heated arguments, and public debates. The major debate intended to
be covered in this piece is that of whether or not evolution should be taught in classrooms. Also, if it
is to be taught, should it be taught as fact or theory? It is also intended to present enough evidence to
disprove evolution altogether and, as a result, make it much less than a theory, but actually the vain
opinions of a man who chose not to accept the truth....show more content...
Organisms either appeared on the earth fully developed or they did not. If they did not, they must
have developed from preexisting species by some form of modification. If they did appear in a fully
developed state, they must indeed have been created by some omnipotent intelligence" (qtd. in Gish).
Furthermore, if evolution were true, "there would be countless fossils of transitional forms....,
millions of fossils showing various stages in the gradual transition of kinds of organisms into
different kinds...., and 'missing links'" (Parker, et al, 367). "Charles Darwin himself recognized this
problem: 'The number of intermediate varieties, which have formerly existed, must be truly
enormous. Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such intermediate
links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely graduated organic chain; and this,
perhaps is the most obvious and serious objection to the theory" (Parker, et al, 367). Darwin's
doubts, however, do not stop there: "To suppose that the eye...could have been formed by natural
selection, seems, I freely confess, absurd in the highest possible degree" (Parker, et al, 381). Also,
with respect to transitional forms and the fact that the animal must be alive and fully functional
during any change, he says, "If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which by
numerous, successive modifications, my theory would absolutely break down. Gregory Parker's text
also

Creation vs Evolution Essay
There are two different beliefs of how everything came to be. One is creation. Creationalists believe
in what the Bible says which is that God created everything. Another is evolution. Evolutionalists
believe that there was a "big bang" which brought forth everything. In this paper, I'm
going to give the arguments that prove evolution wrong.
One of the main things that evolutionalists have a problem with is time. They say that the world has
existed for millions and billions of years. There is a couple problems with this though. The sun
shrinks so much every day because it is burning up all its fuels. Scientists can calculate how big the
sun was at any point in history....show more content...
If they go back in time millions of years, the magnetic field would be too strong for anything to live
on earth, therefore this being another reason why the earth is not that old.
Evolutionists believe that humans and all other things evolved by mutation. Scientists can force
mutations with radiation. Every mutation that has been made has never been good. Mutations only
hurt the organism, not help it.
A main part in evolution is the dating of fossils. This makes a type of circular reasoning though
because of the archeologists and paleontologists. The archeologist dates the layers of the earth by the
fossils that were found in it and the paleontologist dates the fossils by the layer of the earth it was
found in.
Another problem comes up when you talk about fossils. If the world is millions and billions of
years old, there would be fossils at lots of different archeological levels. Archeologists have found
that most fossils are found at the same level, which would mean that some huge natural disaster
happened and killed millions of animals at one time. The Bible mentions of a great flood that wiped
out millions of animals and humans. This again proves evolution wrong.
A way to date old artifacts and bodies is by using the C–14

Creation vs. Evolution Essay
Creation vs. Evolution
Since the publication of Darwin's Origin of Species in 1859, there has been a continuous debate in
the United States regarding evolution and creation. Recently, this debate has intensified throughout
America over the issue of whether or not to include creationism in the public school curriculum
either in conjunction with evolution or as a replacement for the theory. With such a volatile subject
being argued, there are other issues that are brought up at the same time. I find these side issues to
the evolution/creation debate to be very perplexing. The many differing viewpoints that my friends,
family, and the American public in general believe are incredibly interesting. There are varying strict
...show more content...
However, I found the truth of the matter to be that there are extremely different views that people
have about the story of evolution and creation. People have not just "taken a side" and called
themselves a strict creationist or an evolutionist; people have combined the two views into a
personal idea that they created to support their beliefs in both science and the Bible.
For example, I interviewed my closest friend from Oregon State University, Myron Kutch (real
names were changed), about what he thought about evolution and creation. Kutch does not have
the typical views that are accepted by the Catholic Church or his family. Instead he believes in an
odd combination of science and religion. Kutch thinks that God created the earth within seven
days according to the Bible. He believes that plant and animal life was created within these seven
days by God, but has evolved since the time God put them on earth billions of years ago in order
to survive. Kutch believes that "God created each kind of animal and that living thing evolved into
different species. For example, God created several kinds of birds and those evolved into the kinds
of birds we have today, such as sparrows." [1] He also believes that God created Adam and Eve as
the first humans on earth, but that they were primitive forms of humans. He reasons that science has
proved that humans, including

Evolution vs. Creationism Essay
Evolution vs. Creationism
The Evolution vs. Creationism controversy goes all the way back to the Publishing of Origin of
Species in 1859 by Darwin laying the foundation for the evolution of life to be understood. Scientists
are continuously finding more evidence to support Darwin's conclusion; that organisms descended
from a common ancestor modified by the mechanism of natural selection resulting in the evolution
of species adapting to their environment. The following are the main geological topics concerning
creationism: radiometric dating, transitional forms and the Cambrian explosion. Creationism is
nothing more than a child's fairytale that lacks any scientific proof.
The aspect of radiometric dating is controversial to most...show more content...
Plus or minus a couple million years has a negligible effect on the results attempting to be obtained.
Radiometric dating consistently prove from analysis of bolide fragments that the earth is about 4.6
billion years old and once again disproving the Bible's 6,000 years. The problem for creationism is
that they can't prove there 'fairytale' correct because it's based on little fact, so they attempt to make
the other valid ideas sound ridiculous. Therefore, creationism attempts to prove radiometric dating
incorrect and is nothing more than a feeble attempt to bring credibility to there own ideas and beliefs.
Secondly, a once thought problem with evolution was the lack of transitional phases in the fossil
record. For example it was once thought there were no transitional phases between birds and reptiles;
this has now been proven false by paleontologists. Archaeopteryx has distinctive avian characteristics
including a wishbone, a bony sternum and feathers (Geology). Several of its reptilian characteristics
include unfused metacarpal bones, a long bony tail and three well developed fingers. What is also
interesting is that archaeopteryx lived at the same time as the dinosaurs. Again, it seems as if
creationists randomly start making assumptions in an attempt to slander other valid theories rather
than proving there's correct (even thought that's impossible). "If evolution were true, there would be
more transitional

Essay on Creation vs. Evolution
Ever since the publication of Charles Darwin's The Origin of Species was
published there has been an ongoing debate between science and religion. Scientists
have formulated many theories as to the origins of man and to the creation of the
earth, whereas religious groups have one main creation theory, based on the "Genesis"
story of The Bible. These theories, however, are not the cause of the debate because
the different theories are simply myths meant to explain the unknown–– the debate is
caused by different belief systems. According to a November 1997 Gallup poll 44% of the people
that responded
agreed that God created human beings in their present form at one time...show more content...
The creationist arguments can be summed up in one example from the Morris –
Parker book. They state "Evolution is claimed to be 'scientific,' and still going on, so it
seems like it should be observable and measurable. Yet after 150 years of intense
study of biological variations, evolutionists are still completely in the dark about the
supposed mechanism of evolution. This fact surely is cause for beginning to doubt the
validity of the very concept of evolution" (303). Words such as 'claimed', 'should be',
and 'supposed' are very powerful, but they don't give examples as to where and who
claimed or supposed these things, nor do they seem to understand evolution. In 150
years, the evolutionary change that would occur is insignificant, so it is very difficult
to see such changes in such a short period of time, because they are completely
ignoring the evolutionary time scale. Also, they don't acknowledge that biologists

have seen evolution occur, as in the case of moth's wings changing color for
protection against their prey. Morris and Parker are also blatantly attacking evolution
as a science and as a fact (303).
When Edward Larson did his research for his book Summer for the Gods: The
Scopes trial and America's Continuing Debate over Science and Religion, he found
that the overall 95% of scientists admitted that they

Creation Vs. Evolution Debate
The vivid story of the creation account found in Genesis 1 and 2 often gets lost in the question of
"how" rather than the question of "why." Desmond Alexander points out that the creation story
"often hijacked by those who are almost exclusively preoccupied by the modern debate on the
relationship between the biblical view of creation and that of contemporary science" (Alexander
119). Gary Schnittjer helps by adding, "Problems occur when readers use the scriptures to answer
their own questions–questions that the biblical text was not designed to answer" (Schnittjer 1048).
The creation story is not as much a detailed explanation of how the world was created, but rather a
theological description of God's purpose and relationship in creating humanity (Schnittjer 816). Even
more, the Genesis account provides a means to interpret the rest of the "the story of which it is a
part" (Schnittjer...show more content...
I have come to realize this debate only leads to endless and meaningless conversations that miss
the point. Even more, after this week's readings, my eyes have been opened even wider to the
wonder of the creation account. What stands out most vividly is God spoke the world into
existence. The power of his voice and the obedience of the cosmos are incredible. Yet even more
amazing is that God did not speak man into existence, rather he formed him with his hands and
then breathed life into him. I knew that is what happened, but I had never picked up on the
delicate and closeness of God creating humanity. Also, it should be noted that man is the only
thing that did not obey what God spoke to him, which led to the Fall. All in all, Genesis 1 and 2
set the stage for all of Genesis by describing God's relationship with humanity and his desire to dwell
among them, which will one day be complete again with the return of

There has always been a conflict between the religious world and the scientific world. Whether it
be when science first challenged that the earth was not the center of the universe as dictated by the
Church, or when it was discovered that the earth was round rather than flat. Both these "theories"
today are widely accepted and the rest of society generally ridicules any persons that believe the
earth is the center of the universe or that the world is flat. However, at the time of their discovery,
there was massive outcry by the religious community, as they believed it contradicted the "facts" in
the bible. The religious community has always been wary of new scientific...show more content...
Rather both evolution and creation are both correct, but simply two sides of the same coin.
In 1992 New York Times took a poll in which about half of all Americans believe that God created
humans pretty much the way they appear now. At the same time, the vast majority of the scientific
community supports the theory of evolution. There are two reasons for this discrepancy. Firstly,
most of the general public is not fully aware of what evolution is. And secondly, the religious ideals
that have been ingrained in North American society dictates the one creator God, and therefore most
people refuse to believe in evolution. To emphasize this difference in opinion, I will explain some of
the extreme beliefs on both the creationist side and the evolutionist side.
Much of the religious world (Christians, Jews and Muslims) believe that the world was created
pretty much the way it is today. The reason they believe this is due to their literal understanding of
the Bible. Many believe that "Гўв‚¬В¦the story of Creation, written [in the bible] long before all
others is completely accurate"(Cooper 45). Furthermore, they believe that "[n]othing could be so
exact and descriptive" (Cooper 45). According to Genesis 1–3, God created the world in six days.
The first three days, He created the physical

Essay about Creation vs Evolution
Almost everyone wonders if the universe was created and how it was created. People also ask,
"How did human originate?" This is an argument that has been fought for many years. Although
there are several ideas, society mainly argues over two of them. The first idea is that man was
created by God during his creation of the universe. This is the idea of creationism. It is supported by
many religious people. Creationism is supported by religion. The second way that humans could
have originated is through a process called evolution. Evolution is a theory proposed by scientists to
explain the origin of all species. Because both explanations are theories, neither can be proven right
or wrong. To make a decision on which theory is...show more content...
The
Brewer 3 organisms born with the advantages will have a better opportunity to survive and
reproduce. During reproduction, the advantages may be inherited by the offspring. When this
process occurs to many individuals within a species, the organisms with the advantages will have a
higher frequency. This will be higher than that of the organisms without the advantages. Eventually
the organisms will become an evolved population. The other population may survive or become
extinct ("Judgment Day: Intelligent Design on Trial" 7). The first scientist to introduce the theory of
evolution was the Greek Anaximander in 520 BC. When the idea was proposed, it was not called
evolution. Anaximander suggested that life began as slime and moved to drier places to develop.
Until the nineteenth century, people thought only thought that each species was miraculously
created out of nothing. Today, this idea is known as evolution. The main researcher of evolution was
Charles Darwin. He was not well respected among others. He proposed his theory of evolution in the
nineteenth century. He proposed that in each generation, a species contains individuals with
characteristics varying slightly from average. These differences may be minor, but some give those
individuals a better chance of surviving and reproducing. This will pass on the advantages to the
offspring. That species may become extinct. Nevertheless, its

As we have learned in class and as we still see now in the modern world, the topic of evolution vs
creationism has been one of much dispute. To many, there is only one side; you either believe in
God or in Science, you either believe that Adam and Eve are our ancestors or you believe that
through the years and the changes in the world we have evolved from apes. Whichever side you
find yourself on there will always be someone that disagrees with you and is willing to tell you why
you are wrong.
Similarly, to the Scopes Trials in 1925; Edward Humes, an award–winning journalist wrote Monkey
Girl: Evolution, Education,Religion, and the Battle for America's Soul; on the 2005 Scopes Monkey
trials in Dover, Pennsylvania. These trials focused on the school board's requirement of including
Intelligent design as a counter to evolution in biology courses and eleven parents arguing that the
change was like forcing creationist ideas on their children. The trials lasted 3 months and caused
many to form their opinions and chose a side. In...show more content...
He shows us both side of the coin and basically shows us through writing the spectacle that people
made of the trial. Those who sided with the school rejected evolution but didn't have an actual
explanation as to why it was wrong other than that it was just not the truth. For example,Bill
Buckingham, school board member who as Humes writes, "was set up as the villain in the drama
(Humes, p.310);" only believed in that America was founded on religion and he completely rejected
evolution without even knowing enough on either of them (Humes, p.310–311). Although in the end
Buckingham and his supporters did lose the trial, it did not hide the fact that there will always be a
disagreement when it comes to whether teaching evolution and not religion in schools is

Creationism vs. Evolution Essay
Where we come from is a question as old as mankind itself. There are countless numbers of
religions, each with their own twist on the origins of earth and mankind, but one of the most highly
visible debates would be creationism vs. evolution. Depending on where your beliefs lie, the Earth
has been around somewhere in the neighborhood of 6,000 years to 4.5 billion years. One would tend
to believe that this vast difference in time would make it impossible to have 2 "theories" that are
so widely accepted. However this debate gives you just that. Each argument has its variations,
however it comes down to either God created the Earth and all things in it as they are now or that
life today has evolved from a...show more content...
Under the same idea, the "Old Earth" train of thought is that the "days" mentioned in Genesis were
actually up to many millions of years each. This is one of many "theories" that justifies the actual
age of the Earth being around 4.5 billion years old. The third view states that the story of creation
contained in Genesis is not a literal or even a chronological account of happenings. It is instead a
guide promoting a six–day workweek with the seventh day a day of worship to God. The last view is
much like the second, in that it considers the "days" to be God's workdays, which may or may not
be equal to an Earth calendar day. Each day represents a period of time that God performed a major
task. Each view has the same underlying concept that God created everything, and the way it is
today, it the way it was when it was created.
Webster's Dictionary defines evolution as a theory that the various types of animals and plants have
their origin in other preexisting types and that the distinguishable differences are due to modification
in successive generations. Like creation, evolution is not immune from differing of opinions.
Evolution is split between two frames of though, naturalistic and theistic.
Naturalistic evolution is pretty much cut and dry. It simply states that life started as a single
one–celled organism. The universe was created 14 billion years ago, and the Earth was

Today many scientists would have people to believe that evolution is the only reasonable
explanation of the universe. Scientists, like Stephen Hawking, claim that they have proved that
evolution is the correct answer to the origins of life and the universe, yet evolution is still a theory.
This problem occurs because evolution is not the only answer. In fact, the creation theory offers a
more feasible answer to the origins of the universe than the evolution theory does. Creation has the
backings of the Bible, an extraordinarily credible book; where evolution provides a theory with
many holes in it.
Too frequently the Bible is considered a weak argument, but why? When using the Bible as a
reference for any argument, the accuracy of the...show more content...
Not only is the Old Testament historically accurate, but also the Old Testament demonstrates
knowledge that is undiscovered for centuries after the Old Testament was written. Twice, in Genesis,
God told Abraham that his descendants would be innumerable, just like the stars, but up until the
time of Galileo, scholars still tried to count the stars. Today scientist know that there are over 100
billion stars in the universe, and counting them would require around the clock counting for 3000
years. For centuries the earth was not always thought of as spherical. Until the time of Magellan, no
one was positive that the earth was round. Isaiah and David both mention the spherical shape of the
earth. Recently scientists have discovered springs at the bottom of the ocean, but Job talks with God
about the springs in the Ocean. The Old Testament is filled with scientific knowledge is has been
proven (Pyles). There are countless examples of the Old Testament being correct scientifically, even
when the knowledge of the subjects were limited. Why would the creation account be incorrect if the
other accounts mentioned in the Old Testament were correct? Although scientist or philosophers did
not write the Bible, God revealed this knowledge to the authors so the Bible would be indisputable.
Skeptics tend to not credit the accuracy of the Bible and say that the creation narration is just not
enough evidence. Evolutionists have theorized that the earth

Creation Vs. Evolution
Creation or Evolution
Where do we come from? Do we come from apes? Or do we come from dust? I believe that both
creation and evolution are possible and are connected. I don't believe that creation could have caused
two human beings to come out of nowhere, however I don't believe evolution could have happened
have happened without creation. I also believe that the science for Evolution exists to show us how
evolution is possible, and then the bible states how God create human–kind. Is the bible right? There
is no/ proof no way of telling. I believe that the two work together by taking God's creations and
evolving them into us. Creation couldn't have caused two human beings to just appear out of
nowhere. A scientist, no matter what,...show more content...
For example Genesis 1:20 "let the water teem with living creatures, and let birds fly above the
earth across the vault of the sky ". I believe that it is important because the bible talks about the
first of the living things. Genesis 1:26" then God said let us make man kind In our, in our
likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky". Which means he
wants us to rule over the earth and to create food and crops for the other living things. In Matthew
26:59"The chief priests and the whole Sanhedrin were looking for false evidence against Jesus so
that they could put him to death." He gave his own son so that we could have the life we have so
it shows how he loves and cares about us. In conclusion I believe that God loves us and wants us to
follow in Jesus foot steps and to take care of his creation, the

Creationism Vs. Evolution
Where do we come from? The creation of the world has been told through many different stories,
and from a variety of religions across the world. The argument between evolution and creation has
been debated back and forth for years. So how do we know which claim is correct? Has all life
evolved from simple bacteria to all the species that appear today, or did life on earth begin with
God's creation of Adam from dust and his partner Eve from adam's rib bone. As a child I grew up
attending church every Sunday with my grandparents, attending bible school, and taught the ways of
the Lord. I wouldn't know any different until my eyes were opened in biology class where the
theory of Evolution is justified. There are different explanations to...show more content...
This occurs when a species is separated and mate with a different species, changing their genetic
composition, if then the two species were to be brought back together and mate again, it would
cause what is called 'gene migration'. This process gives so many different variations among the
species, which allows more and more variation and population. This process also explains
endangered species and extinction.
The main controversy creationist have with accepting the theories of evolution is how all different
life forms were produced using genetic material that was present and reproduced from the first living
cells. Yet this claim has not fully been proved correct, scientific discoveries and theories have given
it great justice so far. Aside from genetic variation, crossbreeding, survival of the fittest etc. Such
drastic changes from species to species are due to mutations. In most eyes, mutations are considered
to be harmful and destructive. Which is true in some cases, but they are also beneficial in the case of
genetics and evolution. Many helpful mutations are incorporated into the normal genotype through
natural selection, and when harmful mutations do occur the process of natural selection kills that
mutation off. Without randomly occurring mutations, there would have been no development of life
and no evolution would have taken place.
Many religious people in fact

Essay on Evolution VS. Creationism
Since the beginning of the human race there has been a lingering question as to the origins of man
and how all living things acquired their characteristics. The two main theories that arose over time
were Creationism and Evolution, both of which provided very distinct answers to this question.
Creationism based its answer on the idea of a supernatural power or being that created the entire
universe, man and the numerous other organisms that live within it. While, Evolution theorizes that
all living things have the potential to change and grow over time into something new and different.
So in other words, one theory suggests that humans and all the organisms on Earth are the result of
divine design, while the other indicates that they...show more content...
Every one of these flaws points out that the Creationists theory that the Earth, all of the organisms on
it, and everything that surrounds it has not changed or been altered since the flood is inaccurate.
Biogeography for example shows that "closely allied" species have a tendency to live on the "same
continent... or within the same group of oceanic islands... despite their species–by–species
preferences for different habitats, food source, [and] of conditions of climate" (Quammen 4). The
explanation for this is that "they descended from common ancestors" and this can be verified with
the paleontology flaw because that flaw deals with the fossils of plants and animals "that had
[either] become extinct or that still existed but in different forms" which indicates not only that
organisms have changed over time, but also provides evidence that "closely allied" organism have
lived in the same areas of centuries (Quammen 4; Parks 24). Then in the taxonomic classification
flaw these "closely allied" spices can be "systematically classified, according to their shared
similarities" which, suggests that "closely allied" organisms descended from common ancestor
because of the traits and similar organs that allows this type of classification (Quammen 5). The
presence of these similar traits and organs introduces the flaw of vestigial characteristics because
although some of these do not have any current

Creation Vs Evolution Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Paper Writing Services Reviews

More from Paper Writing Services Reviews (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Creation Vs Evolution Essay