AP Election Survey 2024: TDP-Janasena-BJP Alliance Set To Sweep Victory
Social media and the 2008 Election
1. Journal of New Communication Research
Emily Metzgar
Indiana University
Albert Maruggi
Society of New Communications Research
2. 132,645,504 American’s voted
46% of Americans used the internet, email or a cell
phone to get information about the campaign
35% of Americans watched a political video online
10% used MySpace and Facebook to learn about a
candidates
3. Mass Communication is changing
• SMCR (one-way model) is fading
• Audience is no longer in isolation
• Audience is shifting from only media consumers to producers
• ANYONE at ANY TIME can be a journalist
Agenda Setting
• The media uses frames to ensure all reported news fits into
established narratives
• Stories can go unreported that do not fit the narrative
• Social media is guiding mass media in directions they might not
have chosen
• Is traditional or social media setting the agenda now?
4. Socialmedia’s effect the 2008 presidential
election
.
Rolesocial media played in the topics reported
on by traditional news outlets
Issues being discussed on both platforms
5. Constant comparative method
Radian6: tool to track assess social and traditional
media
Quantitative look at the difference between social
media & traditional media coverage during the
election
3 parameters for comparison
1. Candidate mentions
2. Top issues
3. Key words from debates
10. 1. Mechanism for ongoing engagement
2. Issues were given equal coverage
3. Traditional & social media coverage
converged
4. Difficult to identify where issues emerged
first
11. Mentions
Print
news not accounted for
Radio news not accounted for
News outlets
12. People feel differently about the issue, but not on
what issues are important
Distinction between social media and traditional
journalists is disappearing
Highly relevant and cost-effective
Communal nature
Message must resonate