August 2014 in-service presentation for Spaulding Rehabiliation Hospital, Charlestown MA at the competition of clinical affiliation on the SCI unit. Review of current literature for improving evidence based practice.
Hi,Fi Call Girl In Mysore Road - 7001305949 | 24x7 Service Available Near Me
Â
Locomotor Training for Incomplete SCI
1. LOCOMOTOR TRAINING
FOR INCOMPLETE SCI
Amy E. Rosen, SPT
www.abc.net.au/rampup/articles/2011/06/02/3233648.htm Credit: DOUGBERRY (iStockphoto)
2. "We live in a time when the words impossible and unsolvable are no
longer part of the scientific community's vocabulary. Each day
we move closer to trials that will not just minimize the symptoms
of disease and injury but eliminate them. â
-Christopher Reeve
http://www.beliefnet.com/Inspiration/2010/06/Inspiring-Quotes-by-Christopher-Reeve.aspx?p=12#cDYwEvy52Cxc0G2y.99
3. Spinal Cord Injury
ī¨ AIS classification1
ī¨ Individuals can get better2
ī¤ 22% of AIS A converted to AIS B or better by rehabilitation
discharge
īŽ Year 1: 30% improved to AIS B or better
īŽ 8% AIS C, 7.1% AIS D
ī¤ AIS B converted to 27.2% AIS C, 23.6% AIS D
īŽ Year 1: 29.6% improved to C, 36.8% to D
ī¤ 77.2% of AIS C converted to AIS D
īŽ Year 1: 82.5% improved to D or E
ī¤ 1.5% of AIS D converted to AIS E
īŽ Year 1:14.1% improved to E
4. Neural plasticity
ī¨ Within the CNS
ī¨ âActivity-dependent plasticityâ promotes
functional reorganization of the neuromuscular
system3
ī¨ Enhance the natural recovery process through
early, intensive and task-specific therapies4
5. Locomotor Training
ī¨ A rehabilitation strategy designed to enhance to
recovery of postural control, balance, standing,
walking, health, and quality of life after
neurological injury or disease based on scientific
and clinical evidence3,5,6
ī¨ Influence of CPG5
ī¤ Load Receptor Input
ī¤ Hip Joint Afferents
ī¤ Interlimb Coordination
6. Locomotion Training for iSCI
ī¨ Estimated that with 10% of descending spinal
tracts, some locomotor function can recover5,7
ī¨ Long term effects with increased leg extensor EMG
activity5
ī¨ AIS classification indications6
ī¨ Strongly dependent on visual input to compensate
for proprioceptive deficits and impaired balance6
ī¤ Increased demand on cortical control
ī¤ Increased risk of falls
7. Christina Morawietz, MSc, Fiona Moffat, MSc
Effects of Locomotor Training After Incomplete Spinal
Cord Injury: A Systematic Review8
8. Systematic Review
ī¨ Published 2013
ī¨ Objective: âTo provide an overview of, and evaluate the
current evidence on, locomotor training approaches for gait
rehabilitation in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury
to identify the most effective therapies.â
ī¨ Locomotor Training defined by any therapeutic program
aimed at the recovery of walking through intense practice of
the task of walking
ī¨ Articles: From first date of publication to May 2013
9. Article Retrieval
ī¨ Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria
ī¨ Initial Search 8656 potential relevant records
ī¤ Excluded duplicates within and between databases
ī¨ Full-text articles and eligible: 113
ī¤ Excluded-No RCT: 103, Wrong Population: 1
ī¨ Left 9 articles for Quality Assessment
ī¤ Quality Assessment: PEDro Scale
10. Eight RCTs
ī¨ PEDro Scores of 4-8
ī¨ 5 for Acute/Subacute, â¤1 year post injury
ī¨ 3 for Chronic, âĨ1 year post injury
14. Outcomes
ī¨ Gait Velocity and Distance
ī¨ Modest support for BWSTT
and robotic assistance-
based therapies over
conventional PT
ī¨ Gait Velocity and Distance
ī¨ Functional ambulation
improved in most
participants
ī¨ Not explicitly in favor of 1
therapy over another
ACUTE CHRONIC
Improvements in Acute participants were significantly greater
than Chronic
>1year postinjury demonstrated greater variation in performance within the
various studies
15. Implications for Rehab
ī¨ Continues to be a lack of high-quality of data on
effectiveness of locomotor therapy after SCI
ī¨ Training at faster speeds, making more steps, or
training longer has been associated with better
outcomes in neurological rehabilitation
ī¨ All included therapies showed potential for
improvement
16. Other Potential Benefits of Locomotor Training
http://www.wpclipart.com/science/biology/human_locomotion.png.html
17. Lokomat and iSCI Cardiorespiratory9
ī¨ November 2013
ī¨ N= 10 AIS C and D
ī¨ Intervention: 24 sessions within 10-16wks
ī¤ Intensity: VO2 &HR
ī¤ Measure: % VO2R, %HRR, and METs
ī¨ Fitness test: Arm crank exercise test & Robotic
Walking Test
ī¤ Pre- and Post- Intervention
18. Outcomes
ī¨ Outcome Measures
ī¤ Eight for Cardiorespiratory Fitness
ī¤ Nine for Robotic Walking Intensity
ī¨ Arm Crank Exercise Test
ī¤ Resting and submaximal HR was significantly less
ī¨ Robotic Walking Test
ī¤ %HRR significantly lower from last to first tested
ī¨ Conclusion:
ī¤ Lokomat may also improve cardiorespiratory fitness
19. Balance & Ambulation with iSCI3
ī¨ 2012: Prospective observational cohort
ī¨ N= 196
ī¤ AIS C or D
ī¤ Range from 32 days to >25 years since SCI
ī¨ Intervention: 1hr. step training using BWS and manual
facilitation on treadmill, then 30min. overground amb.
and community integrations
ī¤ Received at least 20 treatments
ī¨ Outcome measure
ī¤ Berg Balance
ī¤ 6-min walk
ī¤ 10-meter walk
20. Outcomes
ī¨ Functional Improvements Found
ī¨ Berg Balance
ī¤ Significantly improved by avg. of 9.6 points
īŽ Fall Risk Improvements
ī¨ 6 MWT
ī¤ Significantly improved by avg. of 63m
ī¨ 10 MWT
ī¤ Significantly improved by avg. of 0.20m/s
ī¨ Conclusion: significant functional recovery can continue to
occur even years after injury
ī¤ Greatest improvements with training closer to time of injury
21. Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury10
ī¨ Documenting changes in levels of walking
ī¨ 0-20 scale
ī¨ Accounts for amount of assistance
ī¤ Persons, device, and bracing
ī¨ Ambulation of 10 meters
ī¨ Inter & Intra Rater Reliability: Excellent
ī¨ Validity compared to 10MWT, TUG and 6MWT
ī¤ Overall Excellent Correlations
23. Food for thought3,8,9
ī¨ iSCI patients vary significantly
ī¨ Acute Participants
ī¤ Impossible to account for the amount of spontaneous
recovery occurring
ī¨ Little is know about optimal timing, intensity and
frequency of locomotor training
ī¨ Different locomotor approaches might play a role at
different stages and elements of the rehabilitation
process
ī¨ Further research & development of standardized,
sensitive outcome measures
ī¨ Our job to facilitate as much functional gains as
possible
25. References
1. Rehabilitation Measures Database. Rehab Measures: International Standard for Neurological Classification of Spinal
Cord Injury (ASIA Impairment Scale). Copyright 2011. Available at
http://www.rehabmeasures.org/Lists/RehabMeasures/PrintView.aspx?ID=956
2. Marino RJ, et al. Upper- and lower-extremity motor recovery after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: An Update
From the National Spinal Cord Injury Database. arch Phys Med Rehbil. March 2011; 92: 369-375.
3. Harkema S, Schmidt-Read M, Lorenz D, Edgerton V, Behrman A. Balance and Ambulation Improvements in
Individuals With Chronic Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Using Locomotor TrainingâBased Rehabilitation. Archives Of
Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. September 2012;93(9):1508-1517.
4. Foud K, Tetzlaff W. Rehabilitive training and plasticity following spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol. 2012; 235:91-9
5. Dietz V, Harkema S. Locomotor activity in spinal cord-injured persons. Journal Of Applied Physiology (Bethesda,
Md.: 1985). May 2004;96(5):1954-1960
6. Van Hedel HJA, Dietz V. Rehabilitation of locomotion after spinal cord injury. Restorative Neurology and
Neuroscience. 2011; 28:123-134
7. Basso DM. Neuroanatomical substrates of functional recover after experimental spinal cord injury: implications of
basic science research for human spinal cord injury. Phys Ther 2000; 80: 808-817
8. Morawietz C, Moffat F. Effects of locomotor training after incomplete spinal cord injury: A systematic review.
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2013; 94: 2297-308
9. Hoekstra F, van Nunen M, Gerrits K, Stolwijk-SwÃÂŧste J, Crins M, Janssen T. Effect of robotic gait training on
cardiorespiratory system in incomplete spinal cord injury. Journal Of Rehabilitation Research & Development.
December 16, 2013;50(10):1411-1422.
10. Rehabilitation Measures Database. Rehab Measures: Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury. Last modified 11/6/2013.
Available at http://www.rehabmeasures.org/Lists/RehabMeasures/DispForm.aspx?ID=957
Editor's Notes
AIS A: complete, absence of M&S function of S4-5AIS B: sensory incomplete, preserved sensation below the neurological level of injury and at sacral segments S4-5 and no motor preserved more than 3 levels below the motor level on either sideAIS C: half the key muscles below the neurological level of injury are grades as less than 3/5AIS D: half or more of the key muscles below the neurological level of injury have a grade âĨ3/5AIS E: presence of a SCI but without detectable neurological deficits
March 2011: Traumatic Tetraplegia. N=1436, age>15 with tetraplegia with at least 2 examinations, the first within 7 days of injury. 80%male (MVA-44%, fall-30%, sports-12%, violence 11%)
Cortex, brainstem and spinal cord
Broad range of changes in neural connections that can occur either spontaneously and/or be induced6:
-cortical reorganization and motor learning
Guiding Principles: 1) maximize weight bearing in legs 2) optimize sensory cues appropriate for the specific motor task 3) optimize posture and kinematics for each motor task 4) maximize recovery and minimize compensation3CPG (animal models): exist for the rhythmic generation of stepping movements Human supraspinal control is also essential for the performance of locomotionLoadReceptorInput: simple stretch & cutaneous reflexes. -Loading of the legs lead to appropriate muscle activation. -Amplitude of muscle activation in the legs was found to be directly related to the level of loading on the legs during stepping of healthy and SCI subjects.
-Unloading and reloading plays an essential role for success of LTHipJointAfferent: initiates the transition from stance to swing
-proprioceptive input from hip flexor muscles has also been shown to enhance hip flexor activity-play a role in the leg muscle activation, at the knee and ankle, in the functionally isolated human spinal cordInterlimbCoordination: interlimb neuronal mechanism that coordinates the interlimb activity can also be seen in pedaling movements-stepping supported a spinal mediated mechanism
-infant stepping reflex
-coordination of bilateral leg muscle activation depends on facilitation by supraspinal centers, including cerebellar via reticulospinal neurons and supplemetary motor area
-seen in complete SCIâstepping reflex, rhythmic EMG burst*Fig.*Load and hip afferent inputs influence interneuronal systems and motoneurons, including interlimb coordination, resulting in the final efferent output.
>the amount of previous training, level of injury, and/or the time since injury all influence.
-âPlasticity of the nervous system occurs by specific retraining of stepping, resulting in a significant level of recovery of walking after incomplete SCIâ5-Enhancement of leg muscle EMG activity connected with an improvement of locomotion function5
*AIS regain some ambulatory function: B 35-50%, C 75-92%, D 95-100%
Cortical Demand: Additional Attention to: stand, walk and handle devices
>Brotherton et al. 2007: 75% risk of falls, about twice the risk of healthy elderly subjects
Inclusion/Exclusion Criteria
Participants: incomplete, traumatic or non-traumatic SCI; AIS B, C, D; All stages of recovery and of any initial ambulatory capacity were included; Min age of 16 Locomotor Therapy: had to be aimed at improving locomotor function after SCI and training parameters had to be specified in detail to help compare trials. Studies making use of several interventions were also included. Needed to evaluate at least 1 type of Outcome of interest
NO invasive procedures or animal studies
PEDro: <4 low, 4-5 mod, 6-8 good, 9-10 excellent
2004-2012
Possible Interventions included BWSTT, treadmill training with or without manual assistance and/or FES, overground walking training with or without BWS, manual assistance and/or FES, robotic gait training and conventional gait training approaches.
Main focus of outcome in all studies was the evaluation of ambulatory function and gait characteristics of the participants
-Walking aids were allowed within all but 1 trial, which used //barsGait Parameters: cadence, stride lengthLocomotion subscale
Bodyweight support treadmill training (BWSTT) or Robotic-assisted BWSTT
IWC: 3articles acute trials were nonambulatory or required significant assistance for walking, scores no more than 3 on locomotion FIM
Lucareliī required that all were ambulatory
Alcobendas-Maestroī 1/3 were able to complete baseline walking assessmentGV: improvements in all with a tendency for slightly greater improvements with BWSTT or Lokomat
D: Postansī achieved considerable increase in walking distance after both interventions components
Lucareliī significant and smaller changes
Alcobendas-Maestroī significant improvements after Lokomat Training
GP: improvements in stride length greatest after conventional PT; significant improvements after BWSTT
>improvements in cadence were not attributed to 1 single intervention in one study, but were related to BWSTT in another
FIM: Increases in subscale were similar for EG and CG for BWSTT vs overground walking
Alcobendas-Maestroī Lokomat 4, 4CG to 10EG, 7CG
3-4 different locomotor interventions
IWC: had the ability to perform at least 1 step and sit-stand c assistx1
GV: treadmill-based training, overground walking regimens, and conventional PT c minor differences between groups
>considerably less improvements with robotic gait training
D: most favorable for BWSTTcFES and overground training-consistant with velocity
> no statistical significance between BWSTTcManualAssist and robotic treadmill training
GP: Only Field-Fote assessed. Step length increase in all groups, greatest improvements with BWSTTcFES and overground training, least with robotic groups
FIM: Only Alexeeva and results were negligible
Acute: gait quality and FIM was controversial
Robotic gait training might be of high value in participants earlier post-injury
Need for the development of sensitive, specific, affordable, and clinically applicable outcome measures.Conclusion: not possible to identify the superiority of 1 locomotor treatment approach over another for adults with iSCI
Objective: To investigate the effect of robot-assisted gait training on cardiorespiratory fitness in subjects with motor incomplete SCI and document the exercise intensity of robotic walking in comparison with the recommended guidelines.
-ACSM for exercise intensity for sedentary and/or extremely deconditioned nondisabled adults recommend training at 30-45%HRR or % VO2R for maintenance or improved physical fitness
FES can be too painful for iSCI pts to training effectively onLokomat: speed, BWS and amount of assistance can be adjusted to individual ability in order to create a challenging environment where pts can practice stepping
-most studying with Lokomat have focused on neuro-recovery and steppage.
Intervention: Sessions lasted 60min and contained 20-40min walking time. Adapted to ~30min of comfortable walkingRWT: taken at sessions 6-8 to account for accommodation to lokomat
CardioResp: Resting: VO2 and O2 pulse and lowest HR, 2nd block: Submaximal VO2 and O2 and HR, Last block Peak VO2 & highest
Robotic: VO2, HR, steady state VO2, steady state HR, %VO2R, %HRR, MET
In order to calculate %HRR, %VO2R, METSOnly 3 subjects were able to meet the recommended guideline for exercise intensity.
Robotic walking may be a good low intensity exercise mode for indv c iSCI- avg intensity found was 2.2 METs
7 outpatient rehab centers from Reeve Foundation NeuroRecovery NetworkRatio ~2:1 for D vs. C
Objective: To evaluate the effects of intensive locomotor training on balance and ambulatory function at enrollment and discharge during outpatient rehabilitation after incomplete SCI
-aim was to assess whether individuals with clinically iSCI could respond to task-specific training that focuses on providing appropriate afferent input to facilitate the functional reoganization of spinal circuitry to improve function outcomes.
Functional improvements:
57% improved on all 3 outcome measures
87% improved on at least 1
83% improved or remained stable on all 3
99% improved or remained stable on 1
Berg Balance: of 168 classified as risk for falls initially- 27% improved to minimal fall risk
6min walk & 10 meter: 28/69 pts who were unable to complete tests initially were able to complete 1 of the walk tests at their last eval.
-15/50 AIS C -13/19 AIS D
12% of Patients Failed to respond to treatment, most (22/24) were nonambulatory at enrollment
Significant differences from <1yrs, 1-3yrs and >3yrs
To assess the amount of physical assistance needed, as well as device required, for walking following paralysis from SCI
Overall: TUG r=-0.76, 10MWT r=-0.68, 6MWT r=0.60
-Improved validity in individuals who are less impaired, higher walking ability and do not require assistance.