In the field of anthropology, primatology and genetics, there are several areas of study that could be considered ethically ambiguous or even abhorrent (designer babies, cloning, animal testing, inappropriate field practices, etc.). You may choose a real-life scenario (one that has occurred and been documented), or your own (a made-up scenario). Why was/is this scenario ethically ambiguous or wrong? What should researchers do (or should have done) in this scenario to maintain correct ethical standards? Consult.